All ZCF is saying is Ry is too moderate, and not racist, and bigoted enough for them.
That's pretty rich.
PC deserves a good hard punch in the nuts for acting like an infant, and insisting that glaring reality be drawn out in detail.
Printable View
All ZCF is saying is Ry is too moderate, and not racist, and bigoted enough for them.
That's pretty rich.
PC deserves a good hard punch in the nuts for acting like an infant, and insisting that glaring reality be drawn out in detail.
He really condemns everyone across the board. He knows a lot of history. He was right regarding his conclusions on WWI & II , Japan, Korea, Viet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGua8...7Q&index=3
http://youtu.be/DyqP-iB9wLE?t=2m29s
And I love the clips of him at city hail railing the location government about their privatization of formerly public parks
damn i just keep listening to these, they're great
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXV_8oOeeOE&list=UU1vTH0ByVIcIOB83FbvH P7Q& index=18
call them by their names. don't call them the "main"stream parties. refer to them as what they are. don't legitimize them by calling them main.
corporate propaganda, state run television,
Damn you are sensitive! So you think writing in the imperfect English some of your ancestors may have spoken, actually somehow honors them? They managed to learn a language in a basic form which was not their mother tongue to be able to communicate with the white man, you decide to revert back to that?Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 Bears
I know I would be very angry with my children if they reverted to speaking the very imperfect Turkish I speak, especially if they did it for the purpose of honoring me. I think there are better ways of honoring your ancestors, maybe make an effort in learning their native tongue?
hmmm interesting characterization. Curious, how do you characterize such rhetoric as:Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
totally destroys their own credibility...brutally. Schizoid x 1000. Deep into moonbat territory
A couple loose screws running around
Are you on medication by any chance?
a bunch of paranoid delusional 15 year old's dosing mountain dew in their parents basements
Fuck me....Ron Paul must be a Joo too
short term degenerative memory condition
comprised of one outlandish nonsensical lie after another
total horseshit made up by paranoid delusional 15 year old's tweaking on mountain dew in their parents basement
seriously batshit crazy mofo
likes to brag about penis stat size
fallacious idiocy
Idiotic childish accusationbroad-brush racist nonsense
more blanket joo, and no plane pentagon conspiracy talk
joobo?? Are YOU ^ really standing in judgement of another's "Idiotic 15yr old nonsensical rhetoric" ???
Big of you to admit. See, this 'specific quote > refutation' approach is already bearing fruit. You've backed off your former "top to bottom lies..." position.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Where does your nonsensical "... ZCF likes to brag about penis stat size" ad-hom attack come from, though?? ???
In your soapboxing about "racists" in our misdsts, you totally dodged the most important, material element from that snip: Ryan's choice to accuse ZCF of being a “front” for the ADL! :oQuote:
Originally Posted by joboo
More astounding hypocrisy, similar to the 'rhetoric' question at the top of this post. It only took us around 10 volleys into this "row" before you finally broke from your former insistance on casting only "Baseless accusation. Mere opinion." Twas really compelling while it lasted though, awards for messageboard excellence forthcoming!Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Did ZCF *SAY* "Every neocon is a Jew" ?? No, he didn't. Really. More fallacious straw-man joobospew. ::)Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
And you skipped the next part where ZCF substantiates his statement with publicly documented admissions from neocon jooz. Anyone paying attention knows that neocons are "joosh/zionist/izzy bankster interests firsters", incl both jooz and their trusted gentile sycophants.
... meanwhile you curiously omitted what ZCF went on to say:Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Dawson arrogantly claims ownership of the theory that Israel did 9/11, saying that it is “his theory.” Problem is he was not the first to suggest that Israel was behind 9/11 — that would be the journalist Christopher Bollyn, who Dawson has also trashed as an “anti-Semite.”
Oh, now don't be such a pouty-face! :(Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo;594610[/I
You've made great progress in this "row", and can now savor the feeling of being a couple notches smarter WRT your Dreamy-Ry-Dawson Fangirl-ism. I know I know, he's boyishly handsome; that rich brown moptop hair, bangs down to his thick swarthy eyebrows, crowning his soulful basset hound eyes; that stoner tone & cadence with which he speaks of anti-racism & bigotry & condemns anti-Shlomoites... your crush on Ry is understandable joobo!! :)&
12 Pack, you may enjoy this podcast - I did!Quote:
Originally Posted by 10 Bears
Mark Glenn's The Ugly Truth Broadcast Dec 5, 2012
We are joined by Native America activist Val Shadowhawk as we discuss the parallels between the Zionism of today and what was done to the indigineous peoples of America by Europeans.
Show-page
Download MP3
It's ok. Pat, I get it.
You like the one off racist tinfoil hat nutter sites. Everyone knows it.
There's not enough racist bigoted bullshit to butter your bread with. No problem.
And you know what you can do with that infantile condescending attitude right?
But hey actions speak louder than words. Keep pretending you're not what you're acting like.
Like there's not enough 15yr old tinfoil hat rhetoric fanboys bouncing around on the internet these days. ;)
PatColo, you do a hell of a job exposing the consipiracies and you're one of the top contributors here! Don't let the them grind ya down, we've lost too many lately.
Dude, the bigotry angle is not going to work.Quote:
Originally Posted by optionT
Sorry to burst your bubble.
The Zion Crime Factory! The name alone smacks of blatant tinfoil hat stupidity. Some ADL moron in denial made this site.
Pat is actually pulling an ADL tactic here, and doing a reverse psychology by fueling the racist hatred against all Jews angle by promoting a racist hate speech site.
Hand out some more ADL ammunition....great job. Why not just give them money directly?
I'm surprised I need to spell it out for some people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by patcolo
ugh.....
imagining that's "ugh" in the good way :D here's another, same guestQuote:
Originally Posted by 10 Bears
Sunday, December 9, 2012
The Victory Hour with Max French Dec 8, 2012
Max is joined by American Native activist Val Shadowhawk as they discuss the shared history of their peoples and the historic alliance now happening in the battle against supremacist Jewry.
Show-page
Download MP3
Still the towing the blanket racism card eh?
Keep on spewing that garbage intention while hoping something positive comes out of it?
You know what the definition of insanity is right?
You are repeating yourself... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
It's worth repeating.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
Some people want to make progress but can't think one step ahead of their actions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Do you ever get the feeling that "your" the only one here supporting "your" cause. If we are idiots in need of "your" enlightening we wouldn't be here in the first place, we'd be in front of the zionist media rotting our brains out. I think "we're" (GSUS members) smart enough to know who pumping racist propaganda and who's trying to shed the light on the dark places. Thanks for your concern. For what its worth, on this page alone, Pat continues to post relevant info to dissect and discuss while all I see from you is name calling. Your really not proving "any" point..........
Really? You don't see the point?Quote:
Originally Posted by Blink
You honestly think you can label an entire group of people with ongoing hateful rhetoric, and not polarize them as a whole into an opposing force against you?
Do you think it's possible to genocide an entire group of people free, and clear of consequences, or do you realize in the end nobody is ultimately going anywhere, and everyone has to manage together?
Some people hate the game so much, they hate every single player as well.
Understandable, but ultimately incredibly stupid, and destined for failure.
Those types of people aren't particularly bright, and what does history say about them?
They're already polarized and it's been that way forever - it's in their DNA. lolololololQuote:
and not polarize them as a whole into an opposing force against you?
"the Synagogue of Satan"
"those who call themselves Jews but are not"
"ye are of your father the devil"
They are one step ahead for a long time now. Year 2012. Witness the result.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
Playing into the already well established victim hood status elicits sympathy, and it's been incredibly effective.
People need to start getting smarter, and start addressing specifically what the problem is, and that's only available today by going the political route.
The political ideology is the issue.
Any attempt to broad stroke everything is only going to polarize everyone against you, and isolate yourself from any legitimate political forum.....which is the arena of resolution.
It's 100% self defeating. You have to appeal to reason, or it's just a big waste of time.
Right now we have an endless merry go round, because some people insist on radicalizing potential allies, and moderates, into opposition.
^^ Anyone want to prove the above wrong?
Calling all brains...
"Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." --Chairman MaoQuote:
The political ideology is the issue.
"Law is reason free from passion." --AristotleQuote:
You have to appeal to reason, or it's just a big waste of time.
"Force shites upon Reason's back." --Benjamin Franklin
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
So the solution to the problem is kill everything that opposes?
Do you actually think this is even possible?
Isn't that what the whole "warrr on terrrrrr" is?
How close is that to being a success?
Where's I am Free, I am me when you need him, rambler? :)
I can understand your angle, joboo. But critique is one thing, blame always has 3 fingers pointing back at you.
Trying to join the clans you will be revealed as the lightbringer, and labeled as a spade. Trying to connect dots to your past heritage, and find something to be grateful for and is appreciated by everyone.
10 bears should not be ashamed, it is his own doing.
There that is might light for the day, you will have to wait for the moon so i can reflect more. :)
Sorry man, opinion is one thing, but it's just not going do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Can you dismantle post #63?
Better still, invade how many countries to "oust the enemy"? Literally every country on earth (pls see existing "werrr on terrrrrrr" methodology and massive failures thereof).
So what's the method again?
Force or reason?
....calling all big brains.
I'm not talking about 'converting' any 'infidels', I'm simply referring to (the defense of) the power to say 'no' aka consent.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Would you fuck with a honey badger?? The king of the jungle knows better, least the king of the jungle end up being dinner (or breakfast) for the honey badger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhpjadJTRZY
If you speak to a jew you will notice a primary & strongest trait is shame of their ancestors. It could be said that if you take on that trait you could be construe as jew. IMO The notion of an unreal jews as Lucifer has to go, for sure. Because then your left with real escape jews who are even more ashamed, then still setup on a pedestal as chosen for their shame and fear of claim.
But then again its only an opinion.
At least an attempt made by ancestors to run from a Holy brutal & murderous, Lucifer creating Jew Europe.
But then should that create shame from their failure to do so, because they looked like idiots sometimes trying to forge a new path of freedom.
I say No, at least we are free to choose these days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
So then using reason over force is the correct path.
It is a success as long as it continues. The object of the war is to continue, not to be won...Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
If it's impossible to eradicate something through force, then you have to use reason as the only tool left available.
Today that is the global political arena in a highly interconnected, and increasingly communicative world.
In order to do well in that political arena it's imperative to possess a clean record (i.e. no fringe associations, drugs, hookers, scandals, and the like).
Being perceived as impartial, fair, and honest is most effective way to engage the highest level of reason on a majority scale.
In the past brute force was still an option, (no internet, video cams, and cell phones).
That all has changed. It's a different game.
I suppose the question is how long before way too many people are unable to find work only to pay 75+% taxes just to keep it going?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
Then, after all the dust settles, one group is still going revert back to wanting that exclusive little spot of land based upon the same political ideology.
The only conclusion I'm seeing is the "force" of reason has to be applied, on a majority scale, to a political ideology.
How else?
Whether it's force or reason, it seems to me that fundamentally you're still fighting it. In one case it's a war with guns, in another case it's a war of books, media, academia, etc. I can't say if these are truly different or not, but I think that it's possible they're pretty close.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
The third option is to disengage. It's like a puzzle that is impossible to solve, like that star trek episode where they download this impossible math problem into the borg's ship to disable them. Instead of trying to find a "solution", through force or ideology, just simply don't answer the question. Make it irrelevant by not relying on it. Don't allow it to consume all your free time and thinking. Don't support it.
Time itself will solve the problem, as long as the feedback loop is broken.
Agree 100% disengage. Bang on the money.Quote:
Originally Posted by vacuum
I just went on a Star Trek next gen download fest the other day, so I'll be revisiting that episode shortly ;)
I think the only available force of reason (or the quickest one) is to highlight the racial discrepancies of an apartheid state by distancing yourself, as far as possible.
Disengage from that type of behavior, and follow that trend through until completion.
Make it stick out like a sore thumb. A failed ideology. Bad policy.
I mean, what are the odds of South Africa being able to get back to their version, in any great capacity, before too many people object, and intervene?
It all goes back to my original argument.
Now one is forced to ask, what you've been smokin?Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Politicians aren't worth a hill of beans anymore, they're bought & paid for by criminal enterprise interests.Yes, they must be washed before boot licking.
Its an inside job, one to be followed through example of disassociation, "a seige of the system".
Alex has bills to pay, but could be done thru reasonable advertising, not koolaid.
Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on 'what's for dinner?'.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Democracy is being forced down the throats of the unarmed at the point of a sword, the armed don't have that issue.
Ultimately it's just as ol' Ben Franklin said: Force shits upon Reason's back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
Agreed, but Mr Frankin was living in a different era where force could be used without everyone around the world knowing about it in a matter of minutes. There was no alternate media, and means for everyone to communicate globally, and at great length collectively.
The game has changed. Pretty much anyone in the world can record events taking place, and make them available for everyone to witness, and go viral.
Good point. But that's not really reason, it's simply awareness. Awareness transcends reason....think about it: if you knew everything, logical deduction would be pointless. You'd simply already know the answer. It's like the memory vs processing tradeoff in computing. You don't need to use the processor if you can instead use tons of memory, for certain problems. In the same way, we don't need to use faulty human reasoning and logic as much once information transfer and the knowledge pool becomes vast enough.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Yes, and some politicians conceal all this very well, and when any of those traits are discovered, and made apparent, (fringe behavior, racism, scandal, drugs, etc...), it's very much a career ending reality.
Look at what Clinton got impeached over. How did they try to ruin Ron Paul? Racism, and fringe behavior.
The whole process feeds off those who willingly perpetuate the intolerance, and hatred. Why keep feeding it? Why keep legitimizing it?
Disengage from that type of behavior from a public perspective at the very least.
Agree. Once enough people become aware of the situation, the crisis is averted by default.Quote:
Originally Posted by vacuum
The situation has to be clearly defined though. Any grey areas of contention (indecisiveness) seem to infinitely prolong the process.
For example: Spray paint a certain logo, or death threat, on a wall then claim someone else did it to elicit public outrage, and sympathy. It's a very effective tactic.
But, what's even better, is if other people do it for you willingly, and also make 24/7 websites (much higher visibility) where people go nuts burning witches all day long based on identity rather than policy.
That reality (aka part of the equation) has to be removed.