Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
You're "not sure" if Zero was acting?? ???
Tears do not accumulate at the outer corners of one's eyes (since tear ducts are directly on either side of one's nose), so there's no way to wipe away tears from the outer corners of one's eyes. I.e. unless reptiles have their tear ducts located in the outer corners of their eyes.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
midnight rambler
You're "not sure" if Zero was acting?? ???
Tears do not accumulate at the outer corners of one's eyes...
Maybe the teleprompter wasn't specific-enough on where he should wipe. It is hard to think of everything.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Shami-Amourae
Nice conclusions to be drawn from that.
Goes to show what is made to be acceptable in a society via public policy, inevitably echoes throughout that society. IMO the two realities are inescapable for a certain percentage of the population who are unable to self reflect on a regular basis.
Fabricating identity.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
killed by drones...robots...
No, they were killed by people who operate those drones, and pull the trigger remotely.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JohnQPublic
No, they were killed by people who operate those drones, and pull tth trigger remotely.
I'm not sure what I'm being corrected on, but how do we know some drones aren't running automated programs according to flight patterns?
i.e. if GPS location = (data_set_(pakistan_border)_etc...) and video camera identification= (x#_people), then target, and drop payload?
It would actually make more sense in some cases.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
I'm not sure what I'm being corrected on, but how do we know some drones aren't running automated programs according to flight patterns?
i.e. if GPS location = (data_set_(pakistan_border)_etc...) and video camera identification= (x#_people), then target, and drop payload?
It would actually make more sense in some cases.
Then in some cases there's that guy (disguised as a towel head) on the ground painting it with a laser.
He's got a job in the chain to keep too, needs to create new targets if there aren't many left.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Horn
Then in some cases there's that guy (disguised as a towel head) on the ground painting it with a laser. He's got a job in the chain to keep too, needs to create new targets if there aren't many left.
It could be as simple as zoning certain areas, and giving troops transponders to avoid friendly fire. "Area X is a no go zone". Anything in that area get's smoked. Nice guilt free scenario....hey...they assembled in a no go zone...we can't control what other people do. i.e.... this is a known combat area, enter at your own discretion. Set it, and forget it. Goes on the premise if you stick your arm in a meat grinder do you blame the grinder? Or....the camera system auto profiles individuals carrying weapons. With all the computer modeling going on how easy would it be to create, and store near infinite angle profiles of anyone carrying xyz weapon? Profile match + no transponder signals present + GPS match = boom. Tough love border patrol.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Police Walked A Man In Camo Pants And Dark Jacket Out Of Woods: Newtown Connecticut School Shooting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ovspEgeMXb4
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Now the Medical Examiner is saying that everyone was shot with an AR-15 rifle. Incongruent, does not square with everything else that's come out, i.e. AR was left in his mother's car in the parking lot.