Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
midnight rambler
Now the Medical Examiner is saying that everyone was shot with an AR-15 rifle. Incongruent, does not square with everything else that's come out, i.e. AR was left in his mother's car in the parking lot.
Now we know here this was a staged event, interesting that now many others that would not think this now do, I have seen this will friends and family that never believe but now do, hmm yes a great awakening perhaps. Many videos now coming out proving multiple shooters just like in Colorado. TS is HTF for sure
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Has anyone heard this?? That the mother was a "bit of a survivalist" and "had some stored food and believed a crash was coming". Reportedly on NBC, relayed to me by a very reliable source who's paying attention.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
midnight rambler
Has anyone heard this?? That the mother was a "bit of a survivalist" and "had some stored food and believed a crash was coming". Reportedly on NBC, relayed to me by a very reliable source who's paying attention.
The father like in the Colorado shooting was connected to the Libor scandal
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
midnight rambler
Two shooters (allegedly) attacking an elementary school with guns - what's the motivation?? ???
ummmm -Gun control.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JDRock
ummmm -Gun control.
confiscation actually
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
slvrbugjim
confiscation actually
Isn't going to be much confiscation going on, the Commies goal is civil war.
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
midnight rambler
Isn't going to be much confiscation going on, the Commies goal is civil war.
no doubt you are correct, if confiscation begins there will be civil war
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Roger Ebert:
"The day after Columbine, I was interviewed for the Tom Brokaw news program. The reporter had been assigned a theory and was seeking sound bites to support it. "Wouldn't you say," she asked, "that killings like this are influenced by violent movies?"
"No," I said, "I wouldn't say that."
"But what about Basketball Diaries?" she asked. "Doesnt that have a scene of a boy walking into a school with a machine gun?" The obscure 1995 Leonardo Di Caprio movie did indeed have a brief fantasy scene of that nature, I said, but the movie failed at the box office (it grossed only $2.5 million), and it's unlikely the Columbine killers saw it. The reporter looked disappointed, so I offered her my theory.
"Events like this," I said, "if they are influenced by anything, are influenced by news programs like your own. When an unbalanced kid walks into a school and starts shooting, it becomes a major media event. Cable news drops ordinary programming and goes around the clock with it. The story is assigned a logo and a theme song; these two kids were packaged as the Trench Coat Mafia. The message is clear to other disturbed kids around the country: If I shoot up my school, I can be famous. The TV will talk about nothing else but me. Experts will try to figure out what I was thinking. The kids and teachers at school will see they shouldn't have messed with me. I'll go out in a blaze of glory."
In short, I said, events like Columbine are influenced far less by violent movies than by CNN, the NBC Nightly News and all the other news media, who glorify the killers in the guise of explaining them. I commended the policy at the Sun-Times, where our editor said the paper would no longer feature school killings on Page 1. The reporter thanked me and turned off the camera. Of course the interview was never used. They found plenty of talking heads to condemn violent movies, and everybody was happy."
Roger Ebert"
Morgan Freeman:
"You want to know why. This may sound cynical, but here's why.
It's because of the way the media reports it. Flip on the news and watch how we treat the Batman theater shooter and the Oregon mall shooter like celebrities. Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris are household names, but do you know the name of a single victim of Columbine? Disturbed people who would otherwise just off themselves in their basements see the news and want to top it by doing something worse, and going out in a memorable way. Why a grade school? Why children? Because he'll be remembered as a horrible monster, instead of a sad nobody.
CNN's article says that if the body count "holds up", this will rank as the second deadliest shooting behind Virginia Tech, as if statistics somehow make one shooting worse than another. Then they post a video interview of third-graders for all the details of what they saw and heard while the shootings were happening. Fox News has plastered the killer's face on all their reports for hours. Any articles or news stories yet that focus on the victims and ignore the killer's identity? None that I've seen yet. Because they don't sell. So congratulations, sensationalist media, you've just lit the fire for someone to top this and knock off a day care center or a maternity ward next.
You can help by forgetting you ever read this man's name, and remembering the name of at least one victim. You can help by donating to mental health research instead of pointing to gun control as the problem."
http://www.dailypaul.com/266479/surp...or-ct-shooting
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Forensic Psychiatrist explains how to create more mass murderers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...;v=PezlFNTGWv4
Re: new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
Well done but I think that the accused in this one and in Colorado did not fire a shot