Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
yet another Shill-A-Thon show featuring Delphi-Deanna and K.Johnstein. I haven't and won't listen, as again, I can't stand either screech monkey any more. But the Mamii's comments, 15 atm, are lively. Delphi and her new defender "WV Foundation" (rodney martin) are in there employing their joowey "Flip The Script & Project" gambit, accusing SH "hoaxers" of falling in line with the consensus, & getting all their impressions from jootube vids etc, meanwhile hoping no one notices that their own SH shill cabal is promoting... drumroll.... the official joo narrative of S.Hoax, citing joo "official reports" and joozpaper articles... the same "consensus" orchestrated by the joozmedia and believed by 80/90/whatever % of 'murkans... lol :D
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
A couple of hours ago (11:05pm) I made a short comment about the boy who died twice, which was followed by three more comments within minutes (two by Colin, and another one by someone else), both of which raised uncomfortable questions for Deanna. Now I go back and all those three later comments are GONE - this time by WHOOLI.
WHAT?
Well, this isn't the first time MAMI just erases comments, but, for the life of me, I can't figure it - why would so many moderators over there be running interference for Deanna? It makes a curious fellow wonder.
Anyway, anytime you see an entry and with NO comments, or only a few, it just might mean that they are unflattering to some favored party and the moderators are just erasing them without notice.
Damn! Mami's used to be my favorite website.
What happened? If this keeps up, I'll just quit even bothering.
Anyway, it is THEIR website and they can do as they please, so, I'll not complain, except it is such a waste to see a formerly top-notch website go to the dogs trying to protect the unprotectable and unworthy.
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
Well, this thread
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?bl...19081905052116
finally settled out with 89 posts, mostly promoting the idea that Deanna's "book" is the key to "proof" about Sandy Hook.
There is no telling how many embarrassing posts got deleted - probably quiet a few.
You will get nowhere expecting any kind of a detailed answer about anything, but you will get a suggestion that you go elsewhere and see the link to her book, where she claims she has already "addressed" that issue. Even a question that would have a "yes" or "no" answer will have to be found "in her book".
I am concluding that Deanna has absolutely zero "evidence" beyond what she read in the "government reports", and, she wants a gold star for having plowed through those and swallowed them whole, as she revealed on her brief appearance on the Pete Santilli podcasts a while back. She is quick to claim that she didn't accept all aspects of the reports, but, she will not give a concise point by point of which aspects of it she rejects, and, on the Santilli show, she claimed that you could take the reports as completely accurate (even though Pete Santilli suggested - he was trying to be nice - that she not put so much stock in whatever the government says).
I give up. This may just be a case of her, and others, having spent so much time digesting the government reports, and, with so much time invested doing so, they just can't consider the notion that these reports are worthless - I mean, what a waste, so, all she can do is keep on refering to her book, and making it seem that if you don't read her book, then that right there disqualifies you from asking any questions or raising any issues.
I am ready to just write her off - it doesn't matter anymore who she has on her podcasts, or what the subject matter is, she has gone over the edge here and I wouldn't have the nerve to use anything I got from one of her podcasts as any kind of revelation of something I would want to bring to anyone's attention on any matter at all.
I am still perplexed over that "pozner" kid (so-called) - it seems the alleged parents made a lot of youtubes up until the Pakistani episode, and then, dead silence. I can't find anything from them after that - and there was a mention on one youtube that the same photo appeared, minus the background, in a website from China BEFORE Sandy Hook, suggesting that the photo was made available as a child model, or whatever. There is something very fishy about that photo and I'm waiting for someone to get to the bottom of it because it is likely to be a doozy.
And so, for me, this ends the chapter on Deanna Spingola as a podcaster and investigator. If anyone still thinks she has anything to say that is worth listening to, be my guest but I have finally lost interest and lost hope in her coming to her senses.
I am having my doubts about Mami's also, since a couple of the moderators over there, including Whooli, seem to be fans of Deanna, in spite of this obstinate Sandy Hook kick she got onto - there is not so much they offer any more that I care to download - a few, but very few.
Speak up, gold and silver gurus, if there is another website, or sites, that have good podcasts by serious and intelligent hosts that make for good listening.
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
^ Again, I shrug off talk of Delphi-Deanna "coming to her senses." She's compromised, period! Citing Jon Perkins model: whether Delphi took the pile of money in the satanists' one hand; and/or she's dodging the bullet in their other hand; and/or she's dodging the reputation-wrecking disclosure about some past skeletons (blackmail) in the satanists' third hand... she's plainly compromised. (As to blackmail, I'm recalling "Dr. Laura Schlesinger", the wildly popular mid-90s radio shrink, author, "moralist", and joodeo-convert; who had a series of photos, gynecological beaver shots with face and all which she'd taken with her boyfriend in her 20s, disclosed at the height of her popularity...).
Again-again, it boils down to Delphi's continuous, methodical employment of textbook disinfo gambits, in making her pro jooz.media.gov sandy hoax narrative pitch, while seeking to "refute her opponents", as detailed through this thread.
To paraphrase the quote of some shmoe whose identity I don't recall: "You'll never 'convince' a person of a given truth, when that person's livelihood depends upon their remaining 'unconvinced'."
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jerrylynnb
I am still perplexed over that "pozner" kid (so-called) - it seems the alleged parents made a lot of youtubes up until the Pakistani episode, and then, dead silence. I can't find anything from them after that - and there was a mention on one youtube that the same photo appeared, minus the background, in a website from China BEFORE Sandy Hook, suggesting that the photo was made available as a child model, or whatever. There is something very fishy about that photo and I'm waiting for someone to get to the bottom of it because it is likely to be a doozy.
I pulled this "Lenny Pozner" pic from this Fetzer article:
Lenny Pozner Strikes Out with obviously fraudulent Copyright Claim
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Du5nM9busZ...usional%3F.jpg
^ I'd never seen a pic of this guy who presents himself as "Lenny Pozner" before. So we're to believe that this late-50s looking sob is the father of the twice killed 6yo "Noah Pozner" :|~ :D :|~ :D LOL!
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
That is the first photo I have seen of Lenny. Still we have no solid identification of the personage called Lenny Pozner, neither have we of his child and his ex-wife.
Seems to me the major players set before us in Sandy Hook, 9-11, Boston, Ben Laden two-time death, etc... are part real people, part totally fictitious entities, and some real pictures of real people and some photoshopped fake photos of two or more unknown people, living or dead.
I keep thinking that the bottom-line problem we have in investigating and searching for truth on any of these recent false events or "false flags" is that we do know know who is real and who is created fiction and who is living and who is dead. We do not have DNA matching and even if we did, we would have to rely on a thoroughly evil dishonest government to supply the correct and complete DNA data. And as for "independent, third party analyses" of any data, well just forgiddaboudit.
Will the real dead victims please stand up?
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
this 1st (June 3rd) Ognir podcast with guest "Tiffany" concerning Delphi-Deanna and her SHoax co-shills is VG. Some new dirt on the true name & loser-background of Anonymous-Wade ("CW Wade"), who's been such a favorite guest of Delphi's in their S.Hoax Shill-A-Thon shows. Most of Ognir & Tiffany's ire is directed at A-W, K.Johnstein, and "Lenny Pozner"; with Tiffany near the end describing LP as "a ghost" in that she's been unable to find anything about his pre-S.Hoax background. She openly speculates that he's a CIA spook.
I haven't listened to the next one (June 10) yet; description suggests it's all C.Hebdo hoax.
mami's just posted, so stay tuned to the comments, none at this writing but it should get lively.
_________________
Also, I recall listening at the time but I neglected to post it here; but notice zapoper's note above about having 'fixed' the audio of Ognir's 29th of May show - IIRC, Ognir rags on KJohnstein, Anonymous-Wade, and I think also Pozner (?) for being 'snitches', contacting police & mil to complain; contacting SH researchers' present and past employers to smear the researchers (KJ basically admits to these actions) & having S.Hoax researchers' YT vids removed & channels shut down based on fraudulent copyright claims.
This is 2 hours, but only 2nd hour is devoted to Ognir's Delphi/KJ/A-W criticism, advance to 1 hr for the start of that. Also check out the link for the 10 mami's reader comments:
Thursday, June 4, 2015
TiU Radio 29th May 2015
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
also cross posting here for posterity; Fetcho & Kaminski reiterate what they discussed in a prior visit around a year ago; namely sharing their shock & dismay at Delphi, Glenn, Piper (and the others they didn't mention) who were ostensibly allies in the TM, but then all came out swinging in support of the official SHoax narrative. This dialog begins at around the 1 hr mark, shortly after JKaminski comes on at 52:00. Not really any new insight that I heard. Later in the show they talk in general terms about the infiltrators in the TM.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
I responded to this post about Kaminski and others yesterday.
My comment is not posted here anywhere as I can see. Where is the other thread where you posted this or cross posted this.
This is the first time one of my comments has not posted.
I know I got an email about that had the word infiltrators or some word like that but now I cannot even find the emial notifying me of that posting.
Very odd.
I recently exchanged some emails with Dave Gahary of AFP and explained to him why I do not visist AFP site anymore or imbibe any of their material and told him it was because so many of AFP associated people took such a strong stance for the official story of Sandy Hook.
He was objective and I got the feeling that the people supporting AFP has dropped off considerably. They seemed to do a 180 and are now supposedly telling some truth about Sandy Hook. But it is kind of weird the way they did such a stark change and I don't buy it.
There is a YouTube video where Eustace Mullins says Kaminski is a shill and that K. sicked the Mossad on him at this home.
Still think it odd that my comment did not post yesterday. It seemed to post at first, whatever thread it was.
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
Daschie,
Repost it! Right here. I want to read what you have to say. OK? If someone deletes your post then I got a strong adverse attitude about that!
Re: Spingola Jumps Shark, Supports Zion.gov's Official Sandy Hook Story
The post that PatColo did that I commented on but comment was not posted had something to do with Anthony Lawson and also about this recent thing with John Kaminski.
I posted a link to an article by Dr. James Fetzer from a long time ago wherein he explains how Lawson did not communicate or write about Dr. Fetzer's ideas objectively. Lawson did some great videos and I guess I should not talk negatively about the dead but Lawson, like so many other ostensibly good sounding 9-11 "truthers" spoke about the Israel/Zionist/ connections to 9-11, always supported, vigorously, the existence of real large airline planes crashing into the WTC Twin Towers. That is something that just breaks the laws of physics and the laws of aerodynamics and just did not happen.
Anyway, here is a May 2015 article Gahary linked for me showing how AFP is now apparently supporting Sandy Hook truth.
http://americanfreepress.net/?p=24266
Sandy Hook: Still Looking for Answers
May 03, 2015 AFP 26 Comments
19_20_SANDY_HOOK
By Victor Thorn —
When serious investigative journalists co
- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=2426....p3uj5R1K.dpuf "
One commenter said about this article...
Chris Hassell says:
May 4, 2015 at 17:48
This article does, however, raise important questions about AFP’s “evolving” coverage of Sandy Hook. As I recall, it started out neutral on the question of conspiracy but quickly moved to an almost rabid defense of the official narrative or at least one Allan would approve of. Grotesque attacks were made by Michael Collins Piper and others against respected researchers attempting to maintain a dialogue on the valid questions surrounding this incident. And now AFP seems to have swung almost the other direction.
I would like to demand, as a subscriber, that AFP clarify its position on this subject as it has changed over time and to explain why such changes occurred.
- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=2426....p3uj5R1K.dpuf
