http://beyondpoliticsand911.com/phot...from-above.jpg
Printable View
So the natural assumption is they would use a specialized super penetrating missile that is completely unlike the composition of an airplane on top of it all just to make it more "convincing".
'Pentagon attacked by a cruise missile not a passenger plane'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=811wNdiwpwQ
Leaked videos of the 9/11 attack against the Pentagon confirm eyewitness accounts that the attack was not carried out by a passenger plane as officially stated but was rather the work of a cruise missile hitting the building from a different angle.
"There were 85 videos; a second video was released yesterday (August 29). Now it hasn't been carefully vetted but it appears to be quite genuine that clearly shows a cruise missile from another angle hitting the Pentagon," Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, told Press TV's U.S. Desk on Tuesday.
The people at the scene of the attack including CNN reporters say that they saw no plane wreckage following the attack, Duff added.
He said there are "reliable reports" from airline pilots stating that it would be "impossible" for the plane and any pilot including the top air force and navy pilots and the Top Gun instructors to have flown a plane to have accomplished what was accomplished.
"We have engineers at Boeing the company that manufactured the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon that say it couldn't fly that fast, it can't fly that low, it can't make those turns and it couldn't have been there," the investigative journalist added.
He further said that other physical evidence gathered at the scene of the attack against the Pentagon all indicate that it could not have been carried out by a passenger plane.
Duff concluded that “it is our belief that members of the U.S. government and one other foreign government were complicit in the planning and execution of the attacks on 9/11.”
http://www.presstv.com/usdetail/196598.html
It should be possible to use physics to determine what would make an impact like that. Figure out the amount of energy it would take to clear out that amount of cross section of building, then see if it's close to the energy of the plane upon impact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Serpo
Gordon Duff:Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZufw3G931Q&feature=player_embedded
I addressed the "hijacked airliner hit pentagon" (HAHP) issue quite a bit beginning here,
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...l=1#post507105
and also in
Thread: Conspiracy Theory with Gov. Jesse Ventura- 911 Pentagon Attack (Full Episode)
that's ^ a good show BTW; the HAHP clique went ballistic after that pentagon episode aired- went into ad-hom attack mode against Ventura, since that's all they had of course.
In this Oct '12 Kevin Barrett radio show blog for his show Did a Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon?, I commented:
so when joobo spews hereabouts:Quote:
Anonymous October 24, 2012 at 3:31 AM
[...]
But not much compared to the way the pentagon divisiveness exposed a whole slew of "deep cover agents", virtually all of whom I formerly believed were sincere.
And you know what nailed their cred coffins in my eyes? The principal voices of this newly formed "hijacked airliner hit pentagon" (HAHP) clique, who were formerly strictly objective in their articles/comments, & keen in their observance of the various disinfo ploys which the 911 perps/minions were using against us; then these same folks suddenly & conspicuously began deploying every fallacy in the 25 Rules of Disinfo (ad-homs, ridicule, straw men, question motives, etc) when seeking to make the HAHP position the "official 9/11 TM position".
And as Adam noted during this show, this new HAHP clique were plainly working together in coercing this fraudulent HAHP position upon the honest but relatively voiceless "little truthers" in the TM. So that's one of the huge victories I think this TJ show achieved: debunking the notion the the HAHP question is somehow "divisive", with the TM "split down the middle", which is total bull. Like you all agreed, this HAHP clique is perhaps 20 fake truthers who spent the early several years appearing sincere & building cred; then they attempted to pool their cred capital to torpedo questions surrounding HAHP, using brazenly dishonest "reasoning", but hoping their apparent "unanimity" will ram their HAHP disinfo gambit through, while shaming dissenters (most of the honest TM) into silence.
All they've achieved is to blow their respective deep-covers, in one fell swoop... LOL. Jonathan Pollard could hardly have done greater damage to the 911 TM's deep cover spook house.
Remember when they pretended to accept that the initial small round hole in the outside of the pentagon, was not in fact from the outside, but rather from inside, like pentagon ring 3 or whatever where the HIJACKED AIRLINER came to a stop? And this was obviously not the case... but numerous "big name" (fake) truthers were enforcing this surreal nonsense at the newly co-opted 911B.
And when Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory Pentagon show aired in Dec '10, making a very no-HAHP-friendly case; the 911B HAHP clique were howling their ridicule & disgust the following day, having only giving it 2nd Class posting visibility on their Blogs page. Full show, 43 mins:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrZ14NRbT-s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrZ14NRbT-s
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-12-1...ckfull-episode
Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
... I must note, Jim Hoffman's 911research.wtc7.net is the #1 example of who I describe above as part of the 911 controlled opposition clique who, after years of cred-building, "disastrously" outed themselves en masse when they "united" in trying to ramrod their HAHP theory through to the "little truthers"-- desperately resorting to the Rules of Disinfo textbook in "making their case". They've been unsuccessful, as discussed in the Barrett show above (MP3 link), and were only "successful" in outing everyone in their clique as (formerly) deep cover agents. They keep plugging away with their disastrous HAHP gambit today though... with joobo here at GSUS representin', ad-hom'ing HAHP non-believers, and (trying to) 'flip the script & project' WRT how the evidence stacks up for/against HAHP vs missile/bomb(s) & no boeing @ Pentagon, while also (trying to) invert where the 'sane & rational' vs 'fringe/crazy/faith-based/yada-yada' folks are accordingly.
^ Bully/beratement mode activated.
The missile angle is being used as a tool to make the truth movement sound crazy.
Duff helped to spearhead it. Loose change pumped it out, Alex Jones preached it.
You're being conned while thinking the opposite.
You guys refuse to see it.
Yes, its plastered all over MSNBC and CNN.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
Investigative reports detailing lightweight plane aluminum drifting thru tons of reinforced concrete like butter and eye-witnessed flight paths, are all over the nightly news. Directed towards unsuspecting intelligent folks across the U.S.
Where do you come up with this moonbat bolony?
Gordon Duff is a total disinfo agent. He even admits it.
If you want an idea of how the deception works look up Simon Shack/Hytten, the maker of September clues. Another lynch pin in smashing down the truth movement.
You guys are falling right into the trap set out for you on this "it was a missile" thing. It's hard to watch. You're either not up to speed, or disinfo agents yourselves.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zYSGv5HNPxQ
Give a read make up your own mind...
http://letsrollforums.com/simon-shac...-t28060p3.html