Printable View
Thank you for incorporating some slow brain thinking (the good kind) into the discussion. The picture Serpo posted is designed to elicit fast brain thinking, in order to form an instant conclusion, based on an assumption (aka it was a missile) without actually knowing for certain.Quote:
Originally Posted by vacuum
in this thread, readers can find the following snips where you berate "hijacked airliner hit pentagon" (HAHP) NON-believers as:Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
and the following snips are from Thread: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed, where you berate zioncrimefactory as:Quote:
- It's retardation based on the lies from Loose Change, and perpetuated by Alex Jonestard
- Some serious Alex Jones promoted Loose change deprogramming needs to take place with this line of thinking
- caught up in a cult based thinking methodology, made their conclusions, then stopped thinking beyond it altogether from that point on
- susceptible to mistruths enshrined in cult like behavior. Sadly religion really does play a part in it
- crackpot theories
- preached (literally..as in cult)
- they have been subconsciously trained to believe, or simply just want to believe.
- Most of these individuals are faith based religious types.
- some of you are so wierded out over the whole GIM breakup thing it has scarred you intellectually into a permanent level of paranoia
- The entire missile angle offers as much to the debate as David icke and his shape shifting space lizards
- far fetched at best
- a billion times more far fetched
- Crazy even.
- those that trend off into wild assumptions
- continually decimates credibility
- see how many people would come up with crazy ideas?
- It's insanity
- this grand ultra ridiculous scheme of elaborate perplexity to no end
- The most complicated far fetched scenario imaginable
- this lunatic nonsensical truther angle
- For the love of god, and everything sane in this world, stop doing it!!
- a victim of Loose Change
- The propaganda of that video programmed your mind. You saw some random pictures with no time stamps, and now you're convinced of something.
- Was she lying?
- literally insane.
- All the missile hit the pentagon idiots are doing is fabricating the most unlikely scenario out of some kind of secret conspiratorial fantasy love affair of what they want to believe instead of what actually happened, and what all the evidence is showing.
- They were fed disinfo from a documentary called loose change, then someone they looked up like their hero ...Alex Jones...who literally preaches like a cult leader...drove it all home for them upstairs.. They are stuck in a cult mentality, and can't even see it.
- Anyone that has bothered to read what I've posted in this thread, and still insists it was a missile, is bordering on insanity.
- This is the very mindset that has derailed the 9II truth movement right into the dirt by getting it labeled as a bunch of tinfoil loons.
- Most of the same people arguing with me over that proven nonsensical baloney are arguing with me here as well.
- Something upstairs for them has been programmed to repeatedly form immediate conclusions without any legitimate evidence. It's a cult mentality method of thinking started by Alex Jones.
- What's pathetic, and lost are people that insist on forming conclusions based on skewed evidence
- Someone sounds like an idiot here that's for sure
- That woman in your video is either lying, or she was in shock out of her head, and does not remember very accurately.
- falling right into the trap set out for you on this "it was a missile" thing. It's hard to watch. You're either not up to speed, or disinfo agents yourselves
^ "Bully/beratement mode activated", indeed! \uu\Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
A little more projection to go with your gefilte fish there, joobo? :rolleyes:
CIT conference in Arlington VA, latest video endorsed by Richard Gage, Peter Dale Scott, Ed Asner, David Ray Griffin & more.Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
"The exhaustive effort by Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis of Citizen Investigation Team to contact, record, document, and analyze numerous first-hand eyewitness accounts of the actual flight path of the airliner at the Pentagon on 9/11 has been long overdue, but worth waiting for. The evidence they have uncovered and compiled in their DVD "National Security Alert" deserves serious attention - particularly in light of what we now know about the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises that day."
-Richard Gage, AIA, Architect, Founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
“Citizen Investigation Team has produced an important documentary video that, using numerous independent witness accounts, successfully rebuts the official account of Flight 77’s flight path on 9/11 as it approached the Pentagon. It constitutes a further compelling reason for this country to investigate properly, for the first time, the full story of what happened on that day."
-Peter Dale Scott,
Former Canadian diplomat and English Professor at the University of California, Berkeley; Author, The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America
“Citizen Investigation Team have presented a reasoned, and methodical look at witness testimony the day the Pentagon was attacked on Sept. 11th. As stated in their presentation, National Security Alert, it behooves every citizen of conscience to question the offical story after viewing CIT's labors towards seeking the truth of what happened that day in 2001".
-Edward Asner, Emmy Award Winning Actor, Former President of the Screen Actors Guild
“This new film by CIT is far more professionally produced than their previous efforts. It is also more convincing, given the addition of more witnesses, so that they now have a total of 13 witnesses reporting that the actual flight path of the plane that approached the Pentagon was drastically different from the official flight path (which would have been needed if the plane was to knock over the felled light poles and to strike the Pentagon at the designated spot and angle). This part of the film's thesis is now established beyond a reasonable doubt. The film does not establish its related claim---that the airliner pulled up and flew over the Pentagon---as clearly, but it does make a good case for it. One of the film's most valuable parts is a scene in which cab driver Lloyde England, who otherwise gamely tried to maintain the truth of his testimony supporting the official story, admitted that the Pentagon operation had been planned by powerful people with lots of money. I am pleased to be able to recommend this important film with enthusiasm."
-David Ray Griffin, Author of The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé
"I was initially skeptical of CIT's findings. But after closer review of the numerous interviews contained in their documentaries, a strong case has been made for an approach trajectory for the plane said to be American Airlines Flight 77 that is hundreds of feet from the official trajectory. The on-scene physical evidence attributed to the official trajectory is incompatible with the trajectory repeatedly described by the witnesses presented and is arguably suspect. Aircraft speeds described in the interviews are also much lower than those alleged by official sources. CIT's documentaries provide the viewer with the transparency and real-time detail regarding events at the Pentagon on 9/11, not provided by accounts offered by the federal government or major media."
-Aidan Monaghan, Researcher
List of all current endorsements available here:
http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/praise.html
Its all a pile of evidence for whatever happened and as there is no photo of an incoming plane .......if there was a plane it would here in this photo..............more fast thinking..........Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
http://www.freeworldalliance.biz/Pic...agonImpact.jpghttps://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...O6kl0-e9Wdeq28
720 × 360 - notafreemason.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Nothing I said was directly leveled as personal attack. I am speaking to ideologies, concepts, situations, as being crazy far fetched etc... not directly to the individual.
Learn to recognize the difference!
You on the other hand....and you make it racist on top of it all!
So are you Zion Crime Factory?
Did I personally attack you? Was I speaking to you? Was I bullying you directly at the time?
Those three grainy frames are so inconclusive it's unbelievable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Serpo
Take away all the photos, and you still have a highly likely, and extremely simple, scenario, v.s. the most convoluted, and contrived situation imaginable.
It's inescapable, and impossible to deny.
That last photo with the wingspan is simply incorrect btw...
you've been constantly (trying to) label/brand those who don't buy your/zion.gov's official "hijacked airliner hit pentagon" (HAHP) theory, as suffering from some colorfully-described variety of mental illness. So yes you were speaking to me, and to the majority of the 911 research community who share HAHP disbelief. Now you're disingenuously ducking bobbing & weaving in your denial of this conspicuous truth, insulting every reader's intelligence in the process. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
A disinformation shill would try to propagate such bologna ^ in a bid to bully weaker minded readers from exploring or discussing with others whatever avenue of inquiry zion.gov/you are seeking to suppress... in this instance, the fact that Arab/Muslims had no significant role in the planning/orchestration of 911, outside of being the patsies designated by the real 911 perps.
joobo, as the self-posturing 'sane & rational' 911 researcher you are, what role if any do you speculate "Arab/Muslim Jihadists" played in 911? :|~
please quote whatever I wrote which triggered your highly tuned waycism-detector... again...???Quote:
Originally Posted by joboo
The joos just pissed that he can't disprove the video showing that Jackie did it... Hidden right in front of your eyes.
rense radio last night, 50 mins, 20 MBs
Listen Download Hour 2 - Maj Gen Albert Stubblebine - How The Government Has 'Discussions With A Dupe'