Printable View
embedded MSNBC video of Fauchi talking with Andrea mitchell.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1468635333961175040
Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
The Post Millennial
@TPostMillennial
Fauci: "I would prefer, and we all would prefer that people would be voluntarily getting vaccinated, but if they'
re not gonna do that, sometimes you've got to do things that are unpopular, but that clearly supersede individual choices..."
Are Xenobots already inside vaccines for COVID-19?
organic robots derived from living cells
Vermont University Synthetic biology team builds first living robots that can reproduce
entirely new form of biological self-replication
TruNews show of December 8, 2021
https://www.trunews.com/stream/synth...id-19-vaccines
Synthetic Biology: Are Xenobots Inside Covid-19 Vaccines?
1:12:21 video runtime
first 24 minutes of this show deal with this interesting subject of xenobots -- to about 1:24:00
Today on TRUNEWS, scientists recently achieved a breakthrough in the new field of synthetic biology. In early 2020, a team of University of Vermont scientists and Harvard University took stem cells from frog embryos and converted them into nano-sized living robots. The never-before-seen type of replication in organic robots created in a laboratory-derived from living cells could have revolutionary applications in the development of new medicines and vaccines.
Rick Wiles and Doc Burkhart have more on this Nephilim-science news story. Airdate 12/8/21
Content Contributed By — TruNews Team
__________________
Dachsie comment:
There have been several things said about the crapshoot injectables that seem to convey that there is something in the injectable's ingredients that a self-aware, or living entity that reproduces or creates yet is something that is part living cell and part something synthetic and engineered to do a task that humans have designed this "new form of life" to do.
Examples.... Dr. Luc Montagnier said something like "the vaccine CREATES the variants."
Dr. Carrie Madej said something like the little things (now called "hydra vulgaris parasites")she viewed in the injectablle's contents under a microscope seemed "self aware."
Also Dr. Richard Flemming explained how a part of the genome of a "virus" can be spliced into a new lab created synthetic genome sequence that is the part that performs the function of replication.
These xenobots are said to be something that may be able to be used in medicine to "create proteins" inside a human body.
All of this sounds to me to be something evil and not good for humankind. I am glad I believe in God because I think if I were hearing about this evil kind of "science" without faith, it would be fear-inducing or depressing.
________
Apocalypse 22:20
He that giveth testimony of these things, saith, Surely I come quickly: Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...d4_320x180.jpg
New Brunswick, New Jersey
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WOEhKF0DQd4/
New Jersey Opens the Door to DENYING GROCERIES to the UnV@xxed?
First published at 22:10 UTC on December 8th, 2021.
HighImpactFlix
HighImpactFlix
71661 subscribers
11:40 video runtime
Senator Ron Johnson reviews and reveals Dr. Fauchi's strategies over the years as being the same strategies Dr. Fauchi employs today, mainly fear mongering to promote his agenda. Senator makes note Dr. Fauchi's 1980s AIDS era actions to hype fear and then completely switching his public messaging. Senator Johnson makes note of how Dr. Fauchi suppressed the medicine Bactrim which would have prevented tens of thousand of deaths in the first years of the AIDS epidemic and which was showing to be very helpful treatment for a kind of pneumonia that AIDS patients were getting. Instead Dr. Fauchi promoted AZT and the deaths escalated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b08Hi3kBpSs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b08Hi3kBpSs
'He Wants To Deny The Reality Of What He Said, What He Did!': Ron Johnson Rips Fauci On Senate Floor
18,950 views
Dec 8, 2021
1.5K
Dislike
Share
Save
Forbes Breaking News
1.12M subscribers
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) assails Dr. Anthony Fauci's record on the Senate floor.
26:56 video runtime
__________________________________________________ ______________
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/whitewashing-aids-history_b_4762295
The Blog
Whitewashing AIDS History
In my book, I recount how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.
By
Sean Strub, Contributor
Founder, POZ magazine; Executive Director, Sero Project
02/21/2014 04:10pm EST | Updated December 6, 2017
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
Dr. Anthony Fauci is rewriting history. He is doing so to disguise his shameful role in delaying promotion of an AIDS treatment that would have prevented tens of thousands of deaths in the first years of the epidemic.
In my book, Body Counts, A Memoir of Politics, Sex, AIDS, and Survival, I recount how slow the federal government was in publicizing the use of Bactrim and other sulfa drugs to prevent PCP (the pneumonia that was then the leading killer of people with AIDS) in addition to its long-time and well-known use to treat PCP.
Dachsie comment:
I think this video is an important part of the PLANdemic story. First part is very Q oriented. Also strong patriot message and some mention of Christian orientation of narrator. I am somewhat detached and objective about this video's contents but it is part of reality.
Several important short video clips within this video, especially the one of Dr. Ugur Sahin CEO of Bio N TECH of the Pfizer "vaccine" notoriety explaining why he has not taken the jab. Made no sense to me. The man and the company are plain and simple EVIL in my opinion.
Also there is attempt to explain why Trump had to come out in favor of the vaccines and "Operation Warp Speed." It was said that Trump took that position but it was "nothing but optics." Also made no sense to me.
Video said Durham is going to come in and save the day and save the republic. Dachsie says No Sale on that.
____________________________
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...m2_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/plSNsoUBYgm2/
The Genius of Trump! Gives The Enemy Center Stage To Show The World Their Crime!
44:14 video runtime
First published at 07:21 UTC on December 9th, 2021.
#GeniusofTrump
channel image
Chembuster
Chembuster
36479 subscribers
EVEN ATTACKS BY MEANS OF NEGATIVE REVIEWS CANNOT STOP THE TRUTH TO BE EXPOSED
ENGLISH
https://beforeitsnews.com/alternativ...h-3763158.html
----------------------------------------------------------
Tägliche politische und Geoengineering-Nachrichten:
https://vk.com/chembuster
Meine Kanäle:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/chembuster/
https://vimeo.com/chembuster
My personal greetings from Germany go to all patriots in the world:
_______________________________
reference post number 2364 of yesterday.
at 2:00 of the video of Senator Ron Johnson, he stated...
"over 780,000 Americans have lost their lives."
That 780,000 figures is far higher than the latest VAERS number of deaths of 21,154 Deaths .
Just wondering source of Senator Johnson's data.
New VAERS Data as of Nov 26th, 2021 (posted Dec 3)
21,154 Deaths and 997,322 Adverse Events
19,532 Pfizer / Moderna and 1,622 J&J Deaths PLUS 927,740 Pfizer / Moderna and 69,582 J&J Adverse Events
"Just wondering source of Senator Johnson's data"
I expect he was looking at a list of qualified Democratic voters in the last election and got them confused with dead people.
also view Tru|News vaccine coverage on 12-9-21 show video of today
https://www.trunews.com/stream/money...banking-system
begin at abiout 0:43:00
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/renowned-virologist-warns-of-collapse-of-our-health-system-due-to-complications-from-covid-vaccines/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/renowned-virologist-warns-of-collapse-of-our-health-system-due-to-complications-from-covid-vaccines/
Renowned virologist warns of ‘collapse of our health system’ due to complications from COVID vaccines
https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-cont...-4-810x500.jpg
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche warned of the damage being done to the immune systems of the vaccinated, and the inevitable grave consequences that would result.
Featured Image
YouTube
Patrick
Delaney
78
Fri Dec 3, 2021 - 9:39 pm EST
(LifeSiteNews) — A renowned virologist and former senior officer of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned against the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 gene-transfer vaccines, encouraged the un-jabbed to “stay unvaccinated,” and predicted an inevitable “collapse of our health system” due to health complications in the vaccinated.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who once worked as a senior program manager for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and has been considered one of the most talented vaccine creators in the world, issued a video “Message to Austria” on November 20 to coincide with a large rally in Vienna opposing new lockdown measures.
embedded video in article
AND
video also viewable on Rumble
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/re...ovid-vaccines/
As a first priority, he advised the public, “Never, Ever — allow anything, or anybody, to interfere or suppress your innate immune system,” which is the first line of defense human beings have to fight off all infections.
According to Vanden Bossche, the “vaccine antibodies,” which are induced by the current COVID-19 vaccines, suppress innate immunity and they “cannot substitute for it” since they quickly wane in their effectiveness and cannot prevent infection or transmission of the virus.
Thus, these experimental injections, in contrast to innate immunity, “do not contribute to herd immunity,” he said.
Vaccinating children ‘an absolute no go!’
This reality is most important in the case of children whose “innate immunity can easily be suppressed by vaccinal antibodies” since their “antibodies are so young and so naïve that they can easily be outcompeted by vaccinal antibodies,” he said.
And since children are protected from many diseases by their innate immunity, including COVID-19, its suppression by these vaccines exposes them to many more dangers, and “could even lead to autoimmune diseases,” the expert warned.
Therefore, injecting children with these biological agents “is an absolute no go!” the virologist said. “We cannot vaccinate our children with these vaccines.”
Booster shots for the vaccinated ‘absolutely insane!’
Turning his attention to the adult “vaccinees,” those who have been vaccinated, the specialist in microbiology said the suppression of innate immunity has already shown itself to be a problem in this population. “They are indeed going to have a difficult time to control a number of diseases,” including COVID-19.
Yet, since their innate antibodies have previously been trained through years of adapting and maturing, he said “they are usually more resilient to the vaccinal antibodies” than those of children.
However, this resilience can be further deteriorated by additional shots, and thus Vanden Bossche warns that giving these jabbed individuals boosters “is absolutely insane! What this will do is just further increase the immune pressure of the vaccinal antibodies on their innate immunity.” Thus, booster shots are “absolute nonsense! It is dangerous and should not be done!”
To the un-jabbed: ‘For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated!’
As for the unvaccinated, the Belgian physician described why they would fare much better, first breaking them down into three categories:
Those who have experienced no symptoms, who are “most likely simply protected by their innate antibodies;”
Those who have experienced mild symptoms, not having to stay in bed for any time; and
Those who recovered from the disease and may have even had a severe case of it.
Due to what he called the “high infectious pressure” of the Delta variant, the respective innate immunity systems of these unvaccinated may now have to struggle a bit more, and thus the first category may experience mild symptoms, the second, moderate, and the third may have “some higher susceptibility to some other diseases. For example, influenza or the common cold.”
“But very, very importantly, all are protected,” he said. “They all are still protected against severe disease and the majority of them will be protected against very mild or moderate disease.”
This is the case, especially, the virologist said, since COVID-19 “is not a disease of healthy people. People who are in good health have a healthy innate immune system that can deal with a number of respiratory viruses without any problem. These people are not only protected against the disease, but they can even in many cases prevent infection.”
Vaccinees ‘serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus’
Therefore, in order to maintain their healthy innate immune system as protection against COVID-19 and many other diseases, Dr. Vanden Bossche offered the following three requirements to the unvaccinated:
“For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated! They should stay unvaccinated;”
“Take care of their innate immunity, meaning they should take care of their health … if you do this and you are unvaccinated, you will be spared from severe disease without any vaccine. On the contrary, the vaccine would do the opposite;” and
Those with comorbidities or underlying diseases “should be careful about contacts.”
For this third category of the more vulnerable, the physician said, “This is not to discriminate against the vaccinees, but [the un-jabbed] should especially avoid contact with vaccinees at this point in time.
“Vaccinees are now the people, and there is no doubt about this, who are really serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus,” he said. “We need to have an extra protection for those who have underlying diseases. Do not vaccinate them, but in fact prevent them from being exposed to high infectious pressure.”
Health issues in the vaxxed ‘will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system’
He encouraged his Austrian listeners that the only fight they have is “the fight for your health, [in] not getting vaccinated.” In accomplishing this, all of the other measures will not be sustainable.
Though he expressed great concern for “the vaccinees,” stating “we need to help them as much as we can because they will need extensive treatment in many cases,” he observed that the percentage of this group now being hospitalized “is now steadily increasing. Whereas more and more, with training of the innate immune system, with more exposure to the virus, more and more non-vaccinated people get protected.”
“This will lead inevitably — and I am not a doomsday preacher — but this will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system. It cannot be otherwise,” he said.
‘Strength is found in serenity’
However, in closing, the virologist had a hopeful message, stating the lockdown measures “are not sustainable” and cannot last “for a long time.” He encouraged them to “stay calm,” sharing a German saying that translates, “Strength is found in serenity.”
RELATED:
78
Fri Dec 3, 2021 - 9:39 pm EST
(LifeSiteNews) — A renowned virologist and former senior officer of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently warned against the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 gene-transfer vaccines, encouraged the un-jabbed to “stay unvaccinated,” and predicted an inevitable “collapse of our health system” due to health complications in the vaccinated.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who once worked as a senior program manager for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and has been considered one of the most talented vaccine creators in the world, issued a video “Message to Austria” on November 20 to coincide with a large rally in Vienna opposing new lockdown measures.
As a first priority, he advised the public, “Never, Ever — allow anything, or anybody, to interfere or suppress your innate immune system,” which is the first line of defense human beings have to fight off all infections.
According to Vanden Bossche, the “vaccine antibodies,” which are induced by the current COVID-19 vaccines, suppress innate immunity and they “cannot substitute for it” since they quickly wane in their effectiveness and cannot prevent infection or transmission of the virus.
Thus, these experimental injections, in contrast to innate immunity, “do not contribute to herd immunity,” he said.
Vaccinating children ‘an absolute no go!’
This reality is most important in the case of children whose “innate immunity can easily be suppressed by vaccinal antibodies” since their “antibodies are so young and so naïve that they can easily be outcompeted by vaccinal antibodies,” he said.
And since children are protected from many diseases by their innate immunity, including COVID-19, its suppression by these vaccines exposes them to many more dangers, and “could even lead to autoimmune diseases,” the expert warned.
Therefore, injecting children with these biological agents “is an absolute no go!” the virologist said. “We cannot vaccinate our children with these vaccines.”
Booster shots for the vaccinated ‘absolutely insane!’
subscribe to our daily headlines
US
Canada
Catholic
Turning his attention to the adult “vaccinees,” those who have been vaccinated, the specialist in microbiology said the suppression of innate immunity has already shown itself to be a problem in this population. “They are indeed going to have a difficult time to control a number of diseases,” including COVID-19.
Yet, since their innate antibodies have previously been trained through years of adapting and maturing, he said “they are usually more resilient to the vaccinal antibodies” than those of children.
However, this resilience can be further deteriorated by additional shots, and thus Vanden Bossche warns that giving these jabbed individuals boosters “is absolutely insane! What this will do is just further increase the immune pressure of the vaccinal antibodies on their innate immunity.” Thus, booster shots are “absolute nonsense! It is dangerous and should not be done!”
To the un-jabbed: ‘For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated!’
As for the unvaccinated, the Belgian physician described why they would fare much better, first breaking them down into three categories:
Those who have experienced no symptoms, who are “most likely simply protected by their innate antibodies;”
Those who have experienced mild symptoms, not having to stay in bed for any time; and
Those who recovered from the disease and may have even had a severe case of it.
Due to what he called the “high infectious pressure” of the Delta variant, the respective innate immunity systems of these unvaccinated may now have to struggle a bit more, and thus the first category may experience mild symptoms, the second, moderate, and the third may have “some higher susceptibility to some other diseases. For example, influenza or the common cold.”
“But very, very importantly, all are protected,” he said. “They all are still protected against severe disease and the majority of them will be protected against very mild or moderate disease.”
This is the case, especially, the virologist said, since COVID-19 “is not a disease of healthy people. People who are in good health have a healthy innate immune system that can deal with a number of respiratory viruses without any problem. These people are not only protected against the disease, but they can even in many cases prevent infection.”
Vaccinees ‘serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus’
Therefore, in order to maintain their healthy innate immune system as protection against COVID-19 and many other diseases, Dr. Vanden Bossche offered the following three requirements to the unvaccinated:
“For God’s sake, stay unvaccinated! They should stay unvaccinated;”
“Take care of their innate immunity, meaning they should take care of their health … if you do this and you are unvaccinated, you will be spared from severe disease without any vaccine. On the contrary, the vaccine would do the opposite;” and
Those with comorbidities or underlying diseases “should be careful about contacts.”
For this third category of the more vulnerable, the physician said, “This is not to discriminate against the vaccinees, but [the un-jabbed] should especially avoid contact with vaccinees at this point in time.
“Vaccinees are now the people, and there is no doubt about this, who are really serving as a kind of breeding ground for the virus,” he said. “We need to have an extra protection for those who have underlying diseases. Do not vaccinate them, but in fact prevent them from being exposed to high infectious pressure.”
Health issues in the vaxxed ‘will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system’
He encouraged his Austrian listeners that the only fight they have is “the fight for your health, [in] not getting vaccinated.” In accomplishing this, all of the other measures will not be sustainable.
Though he expressed great concern for “the vaccinees,” stating “we need to help them as much as we can because they will need extensive treatment in many cases,” he observed that the percentage of this group now being hospitalized “is now steadily increasing. Whereas more and more, with training of the innate immune system, with more exposure to the virus, more and more non-vaccinated people get protected.”
“This will lead inevitably — and I am not a doomsday preacher — but this will inevitably lead to a collapse of our health system. It cannot be otherwise,” he said.
‘Strength is found in serenity’
However, in closing, the virologist had a hopeful message, stating the lockdown measures “are not sustainable” and cannot last “for a long time.” He encouraged them to “stay calm,” sharing a German saying that translates, “Strength is found in serenity.”
RELATED:
Anti-lockdown scientists challenge theories of Geert Vanden Bossche, though vaccine ‘global catastrophe’ not ruled out
EXCLUSIVE – Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’
Ontario doctor resigns over forced vaccines, says 80% of ER patients with mysterious issues had both shots
COVID shots intended to reduce world’s population by poisoning ‘billions’: South African doctor
Topics
CoronavirusFreedomPolitics - World
Tagged as
AntibodiesBooster shotsCovid-19Geert Vanden Bosscheglobal alliance for vaccines and immunizationimmune systemVaccine Mandates
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...TgT34JxPig--~D
https://www.brighteon.com/6869b039-0ca5-4231-8bda-f6b4b12cb9bf
31:02 video runtime
[SIZE=5]Peter A. McCullough, MD MPH: A Great COVID-19 Physician Discusses Mass COVID-19 Psychosis
550 views
channel image
Peter R. Breggin, MD
Published a day ago |
Refounding America, Reclaiming Ourselves, TV Episode #1
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH—one of the greatest physicians and scientists of our time—is interviewed by Peter R. Breggin, MD on his first one-hour weekly TV show on www.Brighteon.tv and Roku. The inevitable technical glitch happened on the show’s maiden voyage and it was shortened to 30 minutes long, but it’s a stunning uninterrupted dive into the psychological and political of origins and methods for destroying the confidence of Americans and making them passive and docile. It offers a short rendition of the heart of COVID-19 and the Global Predators by Peter and Ginger Breggin and demonstrates the difference between looking at individual conduct as an internal psychological process and instead placing that psychology into a political and economic context. In that context, predatory billionaires and wealthy organizations of all kinds join with government leaders to bring human beings under their control and to crush their freedom. Aired Dec. 1, 2021 on Brighteon.TV.
Dr. Breggin's new ReFounding America will be airing live, weekly at 6 pm eastern time every Wednesday. Join us![/SIZE]
The Science Racket
https://trib247.com/articles/researc...ign=Newsletter
Researcher Andrew Hill's dilemma: A $40 million grant from Bill and Melinda Gates with up to a half million lives in the balance
by: WorldTribune.com 12/09/2021 Source: WorldTribune.com
https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1639102417
by WorldTribune Staff, December 9, 2021
In a stunning admission, virologist Dr. Andrew Hill acknowledged in a zoom call that publication of his study could lead to the deaths of at least a half million people.
In defending his reversal on the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, he discussed his "difficult situation" and said, "I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance."
The incident is recounted in Robert Kennedy Jr's New York Times Bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.
Andrew Hill, MD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug’s use.
Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.
On Jan. 6 of 2020, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin's use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a "tricky situation." Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.
Shortly before he published, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, and one of the world's leading medical research analysts, contacted Hill via Zoom and recorded the call (transcript below). Lawrie had learned of his new position and reached out to try to rectify the situation.
In a remarkable exchange, Hill admitted his manipulated study would likely delay the uptake of ivermectin in the UK and United States, but said he hoped his doing so would only set the lifesaving drug’s acceptance back by about “six weeks,” after which he was willing to give his support for its use.
Hill affirmed that the rate of death at that time was 15,000 people per day. At the 80 percent recovery rate using the drug, which Hill and Lawrie discussed earlier in the call, the number of preventable deaths incurred by such a delay would be staggering — as many as 504,000.
Lawrie was unable to persuade Hill, who instead of joining her team as lead author, went ahead and published his manipulated findings. Four days before publication, Hill's sponsor Unitaid gave the University of Liverpool, Hill's employer $40 million. Unitaid, it turns out, was also an author of the conclusions of Hill's study.
In the call, Lawrie berated Hill's study as “flawed,” “rushed,“ “not properly put together,” and “bad research . . . bad research,” which Hill appears not to have denied.
Instead, when pressed he admitted his sponsor, Unitaid, was an unacknowledged author of conclusions.
"Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah," he told Lawrie.
Kennedy explained: “Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries . . . to lobby governments to finance the purchase of medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals” for distribution in Africa.
He reports:
“Dr. Lawrie knew that to make its ivermectin determination, WHO would rely on Hill’s study and another study from McMaster University known as the “Together Trial.” McMaster was hopelessly and irredeemably conflicted. NIH gave McMaster $1,081,541 in 2020 and 2021.61 A separate group of McMaster University scientists was, at that time, engaged in developing their own COVID vaccine—an effort that would never pay dividends if WHO recommended ivermectin as Standard of Care. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was funding the massive “Together Trial” testing ivermectin, HCQ, and other potential drugs against COVID, in Brazil and other locations. Critics accused Gates and the McMaster researchers of designing that study to make ivermectin fail.”
In other words, the McMaster researchers, just like Andrew Hill, knew that a positive appraisal of ivermectin would cost their university millions of dollars.
In a terse exchange, Lawrie laid out the ethical and personal risks for Hill:
Lawrie: I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.
Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.
Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground …You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable.
Much like “two weeks to flatten the curve,” in the intervening year Hill appears to have gone all-in on a deception originally envisioned to last only six weeks.
Kennedy reports that on Oct. 1, 2021, “Hill resurfaced on Twitter touting his upcoming lecture, ironically titled, ‘Effects of Bias and Potential Medical Fraud in the Promotion of Ivermectin.’”
Dr. Pierre Kory, of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, commented, “Andrew is apparently making a living now accusing the doctors and scientists who support ivermectin of medical fraud.”
Kory added, “Hill and his backers are some of the worst people in human history. They are responsible for the deaths of millions.”
Related: 'Literally criminal': Supressing data on ivermectin 'cost half a million lives' doctor charges, May 26, 2021
Related: Indian Bar Assoc moves against WHO scientist: 'Deliberately suppressed' ivermectin data , June 11, 2021
Related: Better than vaccines? Frontline doctors prescribe ivermectin to treat Covid-19 , March 25, 2021
[For further analysis, see Neville Hodgkinson’s article at the Defender, and Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s New York Times bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.]
Here is the transcript of the conversation between Lawrie and Hill:
Lawrie: Lots of people are in sensitive positions; they’re in hospital, in ICUs dying, and they need this medicine.
Hill: Well …
Lawrie: This is what I don’t get, you know, because you’re not a clinician. You’re not seeing people dying every day. And this medicine prevents deaths by 80 percent. So 80 percent of those people who are dying today don’t need to die because there’s ivermectin.
Hill: There are a lot, as I said, there are a lot of different opinions about this. As I say, some people simply …
Lawrie: We are looking at the data; it doesn’t matter what other people say. We are the ones who are tasked with looking at the data and reassuring everybody that this cheap and effective treatment will save lives. It’s clear. You don’t have to say, well, so-and-so says this, and so-and-so says that. It’s absolutely crystal clear. We can save lives today. If we can get the government to buy ivermectin.
Hill: Well, I don’t think it’s as simple as that, because you’ve got trials …
Lawrie: It is as simple as that. We don’t have to wait for studies … we have enough evidence now that shows that ivermectin saves lives, it prevents hospitalization. It saves the clinical staff going to work every day and being exposed. And frankly, I’m shocked at how you are not taking responsibility for that decision.
And you still haven’t told me who is [influencing you]? Who is giving you that opinion? Because you keep saying you’re in a sensitive position. I appreciate you are in a sensitive position, if you’re being paid for something and you’re being told [to support] a certain narrative … that is a sensitive position.
So, then you kind of have to decide, well, do I take this payment? Because in actual fact, [you] can see [your false] conclusions are going to harm people. So maybe you need to say, I’m not going to be paid for this.
I can see the evidence, and I will join the Cochrane team as a volunteer, like everybody on the Cochrane team is a volunteer. Nobody’s being paid for this work.
Hill: I think fundamentally, we’re reaching the [same] conclusion about the survival benefit. We’re both finding a significant effect on survival.
Lawrie: No, I’m grading my evidence. I’m saying I’m sure of this evidence. I’m saying I’m absolutely sure it prevents deaths. There is nothing as effective as this treatment. What is your reluctance? Whose conclusion is that?
Hill complains again that outsiders are influencing him.
Lawrie: You keep referring to other people. It’s like you don’t trust yourself. If you were to trust yourself, you would know that you have made an error and you need to correct it because you know, in your heart, that this treatment prevents death.
Hill: Well, I know, I know for a fact that the data right now is not going to get the drug approved.
Lawrie: But, Andy — know this will come out. It will come out that there were all these barriers to the truth being told to the public and to the evidence being presented. So please, this is your opportunity just to acknowledge [the truth] in your review, change your conclusions, and come on board with this Cochrane Review, which will be definitive. It will be the review that shows the evidence and gives the proof. This was the consensus on Wednesday night’s meeting with 20 experts.
Hill protests that the U.S. National Institutes of Health will not agree to recommend ivermectin.
Lawrie: Yeah, because the NIH is owned by the vaccine lobby.
Hill: That’s not something I know about.
Lawrie: Well, all I’m saying is this smacks of corruption and you are being played.
Hill: I don’t think so.
Lawrie: Well then, you have no excuse because your work in that review is flawed. It’s rushed. It is not properly put together.
Lawrie points out that Hill’s study ignores a host of clinical outcomes that affect patients. She scolds Hill for ignoring the beneficial effects of ivermectin as prophylaxis, its effect on speed to testing negative for the virus, on the need for mechanical ventilation, on reduced admissions to intensive care, and other outcomes that are clinically meaningful.
This is bad research … bad research. So, at this point, I don’t know … you seem like a nice guy, but I am really, really worried about you.
Hill: Okay. Yeah. I mean, it’s, it’s a difficult situation.
Lawrie: No, you might be in a difficult situation. I’m not, because I have no paymaster. I can tell the truth. How can you deliberately try and mess it up … you know?
Hill: It’s not messing it up. It’s saying that we need, we need a short time to look at some more studies.
Lawrie: So, how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily – up to you? What is, what is the timeline that you’ve allowed for this, then?
Hill: Well, I think . . . I think that it goes to WHO [World Health Organization]and the NIH [National Institutes of Health]and the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] and the EMA [European Medicines Agency]. And they’ve got to decide when they think enough’s enough.
Lawrie: How do they decide? Because there’s nobody giving them good evidence synthesis, because yours is certainly not good.
Hill: Well, when yours comes out, which will be in the very near future … at the same time, there’ll be other trials producing results, which will nail it with a bit of luck. And we’ll be there.
Lawrie: It’s already nailed.
Hill: No, that’s, that’s not the view of the WHO and the FDA.
Lawrie: You’d rather risk loads of people’s lives. Do you know if you and I stood together on this, we could present a united front and we could get this thing. We could make it happen. We could save lives; we could prevent [British National Health Service doctors and nurses] people from getting infected. We could prevent the elderly from dying.
These are studies conducted around the world in several different countries. And they’re all saying the same thing. Plus there’s all sorts of other evidence to show that it works. Randomized controlled trials do not need to be the be-all and end-all. But [even] based on the randomized controlled trials, it is clear that ivermectin works. It prevents deaths and it prevents harms and it improves outcomes for people …
I can see we’re getting nowhere because you have an agenda, whether you like it or not, whether you admit to it or not, you have an agenda. And the agenda is to kick this down the road as far as you can. So … we are trying to save lives. That’s what we do.
I’m a doctor and I’m going to save as many lives as I can. And I’m going to do that through getting the message [out] on ivermectin. Okay. Unfortunately, your work is going to impair that, and you seem to be able to bear the burden of many, many deaths, which I cannot do.
Lawrie then asks again: Would you tell me? I would like to know who pays you as a consultant through WHO?
Hill: It’s Unitaid.
Lawrie: All right. So who helped to … Whose conclusions are those on the review that you’ve done? Who is not listed as an author? Who’s actually contributed?
Hill: Well, I mean, I don’t really want to get into, I mean, it … Unitaid …
Lawrie: I think that . . . it needs to be clear. I would like to know who, who are these other voices that are in your paper that are not acknowledged? Does Unitaid have a say? Do they influence what you write?
Hill: Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah.
Lawrie: Okay. So, who is it in Unitaid, then? Who is giving you opinions on your evidence?
Hill: Well, it’s just the people there. I don’t …
Lawrie: So they have a say in your conclusions.
Hill: Yeah.
Lawrie: Could you please give me a name of someone in Unitaid I could speak to, so that I can share my evidence and hope to try and persuade them to understand it?
Hill: Oh, I’ll have a think about who to, to offer you with a name … but I mean, this is very difficult because I’m, you know, I’ve, I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance …
Lawrie: Who are these people? Who are these people saying this?
Hill: Yeah … it’s a very strong lobby …
Lawrie: Okay. Look, I think I can see kind of a dead end, because you seem to have a whole lot of excuses, but, um, you know, that to, to justify bad research practice. So I’m really, really sorry about this, Andy.
I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.
Hill: You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.
Lawrie: Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground … You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable.
And I can’t understand why you don’t see that, because the evidence is there and you are not just denying it, but your work’s actually actively obfuscating the truth. And this will come out. So I’m really sorry … As I say, you seem like a nice guy, but I think you’ve just kind of been misled somehow.
Hill promises he will do everything in his power to get ivermectin approved if she will give him six weeks.
Hill: Well, what I hope is that this, this stalemate that we’re in doesn’t last very long. It lasts a matter of weeks. And I guarantee I will push for this to last for as short amount of time as possible.
Lawrie: So, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for? How long do you think you will be paid to [make] the stalemate go on?
Hill: From my side. Okay … I think end of February, we will be there, six weeks.’
Lawrie: How many people die every day?
Hill: Oh, sure. I mean, you know, 15,000 people a day.
Lawrie: Fifteen thousand people a day times six weeks … because at this rate, all other countries are getting ivermectin except the UK and the USA, because the UK and the USA and Europe are owned by the vaccine lobby.
Hill: My goal is to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to get it approved so that it reaches the maximum …
Lawrie: You’re not doing everything you can, because everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you, “I can see this prevents deaths. So I’m not going to support this conclusion any more, and I’m going to tell the truth.”
Hill: What, I’ve got to do my responsibilities to get as much support as I can to get this drug approved as quickly as possible.
Lawrie: Well, you’re not going to get it approved the way you’ve written that conclusion. You’ve actually shot yourself in the foot, and you’ve shot us all in the foot. All of … everybody trying to do something good. You have actually completely destroyed it.
Hill: Okay. Well, that’s where we’ll, I guess we’ll have to agree to differ.
Lawrie: Yeah. Well, I don’t know how you sleep at night, honestly.