Printable View
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...HR_640x360.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5N2kneG815HR/
What's The Covid Jab Doing To The Brain? by Dr. Vernon Coleman
What's The Covid Jab Doing To The Brain? by Dr. Vernon Coleman
rst published at 20:22 UTC on December 13th, 2021.
#drvernoncoleman #whatsthejabdoingtothebrain #earthnewspaper
channel image
EarthNewspaper.com
All The Honest News Fit To Publish
28731 subscribers
Dr Vernon Coleman: https://VernonColeman.com https://VernonColeman.org
TruNews.com show for Monday, December 13, 2021
first half of show on "Pandemic" matters.
Pharmaceutical Fascism: Bleeding-From-Mouth Newborn Died From Mom’s Vaccination
Dachsie Comment:
YouTube (algorithm) getting more vague and dodgy every day, as are CDC and state health department data. There is no good reason to assume anything at all about "SARS-CoV-2" and "COVID-19".
_______________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elRVM03duMY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elRVM03duMY
CDC Admits Having No Records of 'Naturally Immune People' Transmitting Virus | Facts Matter
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov 694K subscribers
��WATCH: Hunt for the Virus Origin �� https://ept.ms/3HoErDa
Resources:
�� Epoch TV:
https://ept.ms/3HoErDa
�� Sekur (promo code: Roman)
https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul
�� CDC Article:
https://ept.ms/32a1Ecl
�� Letter from Lawyer:
https://ept.ms/3kIexjY
�� Letter from CDC:
https://ept.ms/3ovXanQ
�� Statement from Lawyer:
https://ept.ms/3cw77Mx
�� Pennsylvania Report:
https://ept.ms/3kFCete
�� Pennsylvania Article:
https://ept.ms/3Fldkac
------------------
Content:
00:00 - Intro
01:00 - CDC Letter
07:50 - SEKUR
09:55 - Pennsylvania DOH
20:23 - EpochTV
------------------
⭕️ Try #EpochTV �� https://ept.ms/3xVsr7v
⭕️ Sign up for our NEWSLETTER and stay in touch �� https://ept.ms/3wWdBwe
⭕️ Subscribe for updates: https://ept.ms/2Tu9clR
⭕️ Follow on INSTAGRAM �� https://ept.ms/2VW5HST
⭕️ Listen to Podcasts: https://blubrry.com/factsmatterwithro...
------------------
��For more news and videos visit: https://www.theepochtimes.com/c-facts...
��Get real news other media outlets don’t report: https://bit.ly/EpochNews1
-
Support us: https://donorbox.org/facts_matter
Join us on Telegram: https://t.me/FactsMatter_Roman
Contact us: FactsMatterRoman@gmail.com
-
Parler: https://parler.com/profile/FactsMatte...
Gab: https://gab.com/factsmatterroman
Twitter: https://twitter.com/FactsMatterRB
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/epoch.times...
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/FactsMatterWithR...
------------------
CDC Admits They Have No Records of Naturally Immune People Transmitting Virus | Facts Matter
1,945 Comments
Default profile photo
Add a public comment...
Knifeguy1a
Knifeguy1a
4 weeks ago
The burden of proof is on those who would restrict freedom, not on those who would exercise it.
961
Dachsie comments:
If is very unprofessional for doctors to "sell" or storngly promote and advise their patients to take any of the "COVID shots." It is equally ignorant and irresponsible for anyone to choose to take any of the "COVID shots" in a spur-of-the-moment decision. A woman who experiences a stillbirth (a spontaneous abortion) is in very life-threatening condition because her body contains dead tissue of the unborn child. These women require emergency surgery in the form of a Dilation and Curettage (D&C) procedure. It is a matter of life or death for the patient that this surgical procedure be done in the most professional proper way.
After this stillborn experience of a "fully vaccinated" woman, it is completely unknown medically and scientifically whether fertilization and implantation in the uterus can happen, but if it can, then the patient could experience this same stillborn medical emergency again in the future.
___________________________________
https://trib247.com/articles/alarm-s...ign=Newsletter
Alarm sounded on increased incidence of stillborns reported among vaccinated mothers
Alarm sounded on increased incidence of stillborns reported among vaccinated mothers
by: WorldTribune.com 12/13/2021 Source: WorldTribune.com
https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1639456712
by WorldTribune Staff, December 13, 2021
Canadian doctor Daniel Nagase, MD, responded to questions about a sudden increase in stillborn babies being reported in Canadian hospitals among pregnant mothers who received the COVID vaccines. Two months prior, Great Britain’s Dr. Michael Yeadon, PhD, warned the science pointed to pregnancy losses among the vaccinated.
Speaking with a reporter on Nov. 20, Dr. Nagase indicated he believes Canadian health officials are using their positions to block the necessary information from view of medical professionals and the public, The Gateway Pundit reports. Peter McCullough, MD, an American cardiologist who is the world’s most cited authority on COVID-19 treatment, expressed the same concern regarding U.S. government authorities at a LifeSiteNews/Truth for Health Foundation online conference on Aug. 4.
Dr. Nagase said part of this information comes from a fellow MD with contacts throughout the Vancouver medical system, who reported doulas who work in women and children’s hospitals in one of the birthing centers for Vancouver “had 13 stillbirths in a 24-hour period.” “In Waterloo, Ontario, I have a more reliable statistic, that there were 86 stillbirths between January and July,” Dr. Nagase declared.
If true, that is an extraordinary increase in fetal deaths.
“Normally, it’s only five or six stillbirths every year. So, about one stillbirth every two months is the usual rate. To suddenly get to 86 stillbirths in six months, that’s highly unusual,” Dr. Nagase said.
The common denominator appears clear: COVID-19 vaccination.
“The most important confirmation that we have from the Waterloo, Ontario report was that all of the 86 stillbirths were fully vaccinated,” Dr. Nagase said. “We are seeing a correlation.... You have to ask yourself, what is going on that is both in Waterloo, Ontario and Vancouver that is suddenly causing an increase in stillbirths?”
The stillbirths that Dr. Nagase’s colleagues are reporting appear to have been anticipated by Dr. Michael Yeadon, PhD, earlier this year. Dr. Yeadon, is the former Chief Scientific Officer at Pfizer, UK. He laid out the science behind the risks mRNA COVID-19 vaccines pose for women’s reproduction during the Aug. 4 online conference.
Dr. Yeadon called attention to a study the Japanese medicines regulator required of Pfizer on how the vaccine distributed through the body in rats, something that is not required in the U.S. and Europe.
“To my horror, what we find is the vaccine [in rats] doesn’t just distribute around the body and then wash out again, which is what you’d hope,” Dr. Yeadon said. “It concentrates in ovaries of rats, and it concentrates at least 20-fold over the concentration in other background tissues like muscles.”
“In toxicology, if you don’t have any data to contradict what you’ve learned [in the animal study], that is the assumption you make for humans,” he continued. “So, my assumption at the moment is that that is what is happening to every female who’s been given these vaccines. These vaccines are concentrating in her ovaries. That is very worrying. We don’t know what that will do, but it cannot be benign, and it could be seriously harmful, because the vaccines will then express the coronavirus spike protein and we know that there are unwanted biologies from that spike protein.”
Another significant concern is that the coronavirus protein is “faintly similar, not very strongly, but faintly similar to an essential protein in your placenta, something that is absolutely required for fertilization, for formation, and maintenance of the placenta. So, you can’t get pregnant and have a successful pregnancy if this protein is damaged in any way. And we noticed that the coronavirus spike protein was similar, similar enough that I was worried,” Dr. Yeadon said.
Eight months earlier, he and a German doctor had petitioned the European Medicines Agency to perform experiments to rule out the possibility that the vaccines would produce an immune response that would attack this essential protein in the placenta.
“Now a study has just come out a few weeks ago and it says exactly what I was worried about,” Dr. Yeadon explained. “Fifteen women were given Pfizer vaccine. They drew blood samples every few days, and they measured antibodies against the spike protein, which took several weeks to appear, and they also measured antibodies against the placenta. They found within the first one to four days an increase of two and a half to three times. An increase of 300% in antibodies against their own placenta in the first four days.”
“I’m sorry to say this,” Dr. Yeadon continued, “but that is a vaccine-induced autoimmune attack on their own placenta. I think you can only expect that that is happening in every woman of childbearing potential – is generating antibodies against this critical protein required for fertilization and successful pregnancy. Now, what the effect will be, we can’t be certain. It can’t be benign.”
Whether it would cause loss of pregnancies, Dr. Yeadon concluded, “I don’t know if it would be enough to cause first trimester losses, but I would think it would. I’ve looked at the literature. Women who are unfortunate enough to have autoimmune diseases tend to have high rates of first trimester losses. What this vaccine has done is induced an autoimmune response. I’m here to warn you if you are of childbearing potential or younger, not at menopause, I would strongly recommend you do not accept these vaccines.”
Ultimately, the records needed to answer these questions, Dr. Nagase says, are in the hands of the health authorities and they are refusing to release them without legal coercion.
Dr. Nagase believes health authorities may be dodging the correlation by using the technical definitions of “vaccinated” to avoid scrutiny. At less than two weeks after the second shot, an individual is still considered "unvaccinated" because the vaccine is not yet fully effective. “They’re saying it’s ‘unvaccinated people,’ but there are so many people who are within two weeks of their second shot and they are getting deathly ill.”
“We deserve to know how many percent of the ICU is filled with people who are having side effects within one week of the injection. And then, if they are clogging the ICUs because they are getting a vaccine injury, but then they’re being labeled as unvaccinated, that is an absolute lie.”
“We need to get Freedom of Information Requests. We need doctors, nurses, unit clerks at hospitals to start printing out the statistics because we know if we ask the health authorities to print out the statistics they will refuse and that is absolutely criminal,” Dr. Nagase said. “We should not be asking some administrator for permission to get the death statistics,” he continued. “We should not have to ask some kind of health minister for permission to get the actual rate of [intensive care unit] stays.”
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-hire-program/
US hospitals: fraud, murder, cash; federal assassination-for-hire program
Dec 14, 2021
by Jon Rappoport
“Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services] whistleblowers have calculated a total [federal] payment [to hospitals] of at least $100,000 per [COVID] patient.”
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a private medical organization founded in 1943, has the story — “Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19” (11/17/21), authored by Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D. and Ali Shultz, J.D.
Here are stunning excerpts:
“Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol…for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate…”
“As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.”
“The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).”
“In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, ‘CMS has granted “waivers” of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.’…The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”
“Creating a ‘National Pandemic Emergency’ provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These ‘bounties’ must paid back if not ‘earned’ by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.”
“The hospital payments include:
* A ‘free’ required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
* Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
* Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
* A 20 percent ‘boost’ bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
* Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
* More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
* A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.”
“CMS implemented ‘value-based’ payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.”
“Outside hospitals, physician MIPS [Merit-based Incentive Payment System] quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.”
“Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.”
“There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffer an adverse effect, and the drug often had to be stopped after five to ten days because of these effects, such as kidney and liver damage, and death. Remdesivir trials during the 2018 West African Ebola outbreak had to be discontinued because death rate exceeded 50%. Yet, in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals use to treat COVID-19, even when the COVID clinical trials of remdesivir showed similar adverse effects. In ventilated patients, the death toll is staggering. A National Library of Medicine January 2021 report of 69 studies involving more than 57,000 patients concluded that fatality rates were 45 percent in COVID-19 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, increasing to 84 percent in older patients. Renz announced at a Truth for Health Foundation Press Conference that CMS data showed that in Texas hospitals, 84.9% percent of all patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.”
“Then there are deaths from restrictions on effective treatments for hospitalized patients. Renz and a team of data analysts have estimated that more than 800,000 deaths in America’s hospitals, in COVID-19 and other patients, have been caused by approaches restricting fluids, nutrition, antibiotics, effective antivirals, anti-inflammatories, and therapeutic doses of anti-coagulants.”
—end of article excerpt—
This is basically a federally incentivized protocol for murder.
To say it violates every code of medical ethics would be a vast understatement.
Cash for death.
There are MANY doctors and nurses who work in these hospitals who know what they’re doing, who know they’re following orders that result in the deaths of their patients; but they keep doing it.
They would rather murder their patients than lose their jobs.
And there are MANY employees at the FDA, NIH, and other public health agencies who also know the score, keep their heads down, and facilitate murder.
There are MANY so-called journalists who work at mainstream outlets who know what’s going on and say nothing.
Mass murder is central to the overall COVID program. But feel free to think that the vaccine, on the other hand, is pure and safe and essential. The people running the show just want to kill some and save others. Sure, that makes perfect sense.
If they’re all schizophrenic messiahs-and-killers and you’re schizophrenic for believing in them.
https://nationalfile.com/fauci-covid...nvaxxed-blame/
FAUCI: COVID-19 Is 'Much More Formidable' After Mass Vaccination Campaign, Unvaxxed To Blame
Tom Elliott
@tomselliott
Fauci claims the reason his handling of Covid is backfiring, with more deaths in 2021 than 2020, is due to “Delta” and "60 million people in this country who are eligible to be vaccinated, who have not gotten vaccinated"
10:58 AM · Dec 14, 2021
watch embedded vide0 in Twitter
https://twitter.com/i/status/1470800498253250560
1:23 video runtime
143
https://www.citizensjournal.us/the-c...d-vaccination/
The CDC Suddenly Changes the Definition of ‘Vaccine’ and ‘Vaccination’
Added by Johanna Anim Caviezel on September 13, 2021.
Saved under Columns, COVID Pandemic, National
Tags: Nick Arama, Red State, vaccination, vaccine
By Nick Arama, Red State
Matt Margolis over at our sister site PJ Media has picked up on a very interesting change on the CDC website when it comes to the definitions for “vaccine” and “vaccination.”
The timing of the change is very interesting.
He notes that it would appear that the CDC is trying to change how we understand the concept of vaccinations.
He highlights the definition of terms on August 26, 2021.*
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
That had been their definition since at least May 16, 2018, according to PJ Media.
But then, come September 1, suddenly there was a big change.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm *
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
Why are they trying to back off of what the definitions used to be? Now they are talking about a vaccine stimulating the immune response but not to “produce immunity.” Now they’re saying a vaccination doesn’t produce immunity but will “produce protection.”
Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
Check out @CDCgov’s
https://twitter.com/CDCgov?ref_src=t...440015evolving definition of “vaccination.” They’ve been busy at the Ministry of Truth:
https://www.citizensjournal.us/wp-co...et-600x475.jpg
They appear to be changing the definition to fit what we’re being told about the COVID-19 vaccines — that they don’t necessarily provide immunity but just “protection” from more serious illness. Meanwhile, it fits with the push for more “booster” shots, to keep up the continued “protection.” So they’ve changed the definition of vaccines so that it no longer means preventing the disease or producing immunity. Whereas before it wouldn’t necessarily meet their definition of a vaccine, now it meets the new definition.
We’ve seen the CDC have wrong (bigger) numbers for COVID deaths in Florida (what a coincidence). We’ve seen them falsely claim that the Delta variant is as contagious as chicken pox. Now we see them redefining words to better fit what they’re pushing with the COVID “vaccine.” Is this one more effort to control the narrative?
_________________
The old - Before September 1, 2021 definitions.
*
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/terms/glossary.html
V
Vaccination: Listen media icon[MP3]
The physical act of administering any vaccine or toxoid.
Vaccinia: Listen media icon[MP3]
A virus related to the smallpox and cowpox viruses, which is used in smallpox vaccine.
Vaccine: Listen media icon[MP3]
A suspension of live (usually attenuated) or inactivated microorganisms (e.g. bacteria or viruses) or fractions thereof administered to induce immunity and prevent infectious diseases and their sequelae. Some vaccines contain highly defined antigens (e.g., the polysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae type b or the surface antigen of hepatitis B); others have antigens that are complex or incompletely defined (e.g. Bordetella pertussis antigens or live attenuated viruses).
Page last reviewed: July 30, 2020
Content source: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
_____
**
The new - After September 1, 2021 definitions.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Immunization: The Basics
Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines
mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases. Learn about how COVID-19 mRNA vaccines work.
Definition of Terms
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
Page last reviewed: September 1, 2021
Content source: National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
https://mailchi.mp/aapsonline/no-to-hr-55?e=e5323d9f11
https://mcusercontent.com/30a32513ae...c9228a84ca.jpg
https://gallery.mailchimp.com/30a325...2376e2bccf.png
Dear AAPS Members and Friends,
Late last month the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 550, the "Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2021."
Proponents in Congress criticized for voting for the bill, spin their action with slippery statements like it, "does not create a federal vaccine database," "information in state-run systems is kept private," and there will be "guardrails" to "protect against abuse."
While the bill does not explicitly create a "federal vaccine database," it does lay the groundwork for federal influence and control over the tracking of immunization records of American citizens and will coerce states to adopt systems that comply with the goals of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The bill also makes clear that the federal government expects the records and information will be accessible by a wide range of government entities, "non-governmental entities," and "other persons." Protection from "guardrails" appears to be guided by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, currently a Biden-appointee, who has stated, "it is absolutely the government's business" to know people's vaccine status.
Here are excerpts directly from the text of H.R. 550 that explain some of what the $400,000,000 in taxpayer funds appropriated by bill is intended to accomplish:
The Secretary [of HHS] shall: conduct activities to expand, enhance, and improve immunization information systems.
And [the Secretary shall] award grants or cooperative agreements:
to improve and increase consistency in patient matching, data collection, reporting, bidirectional exchange, and analysis of immunization-related information;
for improving the secure bidirectional exchange of immunization record data among Federal, State, local, Tribal, and territorial governmental entities and non-governmental entities;
for improving such exchange among public health officials in multiple jurisdictions within a State;
for simplifying and supporting electronic reporting by any health care provider;
for supporting the standardization of immunization information systems to accelerate interoperability; and,
for developing information related to the use and importance of immunization record data and disseminating such information to health care providers and other persons authorized under State law to access such information, including payors [your insurance company and government health programs for example] and health care facilities.
In an era where vaccination status increasingly determines an individual's ability to simply participate in society, are the above activities that undermine patient privacy something the federal government should be involved in supporting and directing?
Please help speak out against H.R. 550 as it moves to the U.S. Senate for consideration. In addition to the serious concerns outlined above, passage may open the door wider to government intrusion into medical privacy in other areas as well, so stopping this bill is critical.
CLICK HERE or visit https://p2a.co/MBIkHNv to get a message on the way to your Senators asking them to oppose H.R. 550.
Thank you for your help in standing up for patient privacy and individual rights! Your voice makes a difference.
~AAPS
____
This week's physician-written op-ed distributed by AAPS to media outlets across the United States is a featured article at WND.com.
By Jane M. Orient, M.D.
In addition to being subjected to various forms of censorship, for the first time in living memory American doctors are getting threat letters from licensure boards warning them against distributing "harmful misinformation." Medical boards in 12 states have disciplined doctors because of this allegation. While it is claimed that there's an epidemic of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic, the warnings don't spell out what that means.
We don't have an epidemic of patients dying because doctors told them to refuse treatment or to drink Clorox or aquarium cleaner.
In fact, no patients need to have suffered any harm at all for the medical board to investigate a doctor's no-longer-free speech. All it takes is an anonymous complaint.
Pharmacists that were converted into the overseers of physicians' prescribing practices will complain that a doctor had prescribed ivermectin for COVID-19. ...
"Harmful misinformation" appears to mean anything that contradicts or asks questions or raises doubt about the dogma that "vaccines are safe and effective," or suggests a treatment not endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and their corporate sponsors.
One source of the allegedly "harmful misinformation" is a database created and maintained by the CDC, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
READ FULL ARTICLE: https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/delicens...isinformation/
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...DV_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EejVOCzaXGDV/
The New Normal-Dead Babies, Vaxxed Moms Are Delivering Injured, Dead-Stew Peters
10:04 video runtime
The New Normal-Dead Babies, Vaxxed Moms Are Delivering Injured, Dead-Stew Peters
First published at 00:21 UTC on December 15th, 2021.
Jim_Crenshaw
This unnamed guest is a nurse and has been for fifteen years. She currently practices in her hospital’s postpartum unit, where she cares for newborn infants. She says she’s seen disturbing things among the newborns born to vaccinated moms. Here’s a partial list: heart murmurs, unusually red skin, jaundice, and shrunken genitals in male infants. More videos you may want to take a look at:
Mother uses shotgun to remove her kids from social media. BANG!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pjxF01Hn1qO6/
Airline Pilot Magazine shows a staggering amount of pilot deaths for 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MY4jDRFd5jly/
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...qX_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JSXAHHwKLTqX/
Dr Robert Malone's Warning To All Parents On mRNA Vaccines - Global Covid Summit
Dr Robert Malone's Warning To All Parents On mRNA Vaccines - Global Covid Summit
First published at 03:38 UTC on December 14th, 2021.
ja37
Dr Robert Malone, the person who created the RNA Vaccine technology, advises AGAINST giving your children the GENE THERAPY FRAUDULENTLY being pushed as a COVID-19 VACCINE.
If you understand all he is saying, you will understand it is a MISTAKE FOR EVERYONE that accepts it. IT CANNOT BE UNDONE.
Full text of Dr. Robert Malone's statement is here:
https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/l...erting-parents
This video explains why so many are dying from it, and exactly why EVERYONE will die from it.
Dr Noack Killed 4 Days After Posting This Vid on How Graphene Hydroxide Nano-razors Destroy Body
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vOgX8FTMiJCn/
____________________
Full text of Dr. Robert Malone's statement is here:
https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/l...erting-parents
https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/l...erting-parents
Updated:
Dec 13, 2021
Original:
Dec 11, 2021
Before your child is injected, watch Dr. Robert Malone’s statement on child COVID vaccinations
Before you vaccinate your child, which is irreversible and potentially permanently damaging, find out why 15,000 physicians and medical scientists around the world signed a declaration publicly declaring that healthy children should NOT be vaccinated for COVID-19. On behalf of these MDs and PhDs, Dr. Robert Malone, who has devoted his career to vaccine development, provides parents a clear statement outlining the scientific facts behind this decision.
Physicians and Medical Scientists
Full Text of Malone Statement
My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.
I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I'm generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.
After this, I will be posting the text of this statement so you can share it with your friends and family.
Before you inject your child - a decision that is irreversible - I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created:
There are three issues parents need to understand:
The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children's cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including
Their brain and nervous system
Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots
Their reproductive system, and
This vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system
The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable
You can’t fix the lesions within their brain
You can’t repair heart tissue scarring
You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system, and
This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family
The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.
We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks
Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later
Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history
One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.
Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents
It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease
In summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.
The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close.
As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.
The statement was delivered at a livestream event on December 12 for which Unity Project partnered with the Global Covid Summit. Dr. Robert Malone and other leading physicians discussed their recent Physicians' Declaration update, why healthy children should not be vaccinated and the associated risks. Read supporting evidence here.