High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 High

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

You on the other hand....and you make it racist on top of it all!

---

Its not being racist, joboo.

We're just making large scathing notes of your differences.

The pink, is it your natural color?

http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/...-people-29.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cebu_4_2

The joos just pissed that he can't disprove the video showing that Jackie did it... Hidden right in front of your eyes.

---

Dude, that's your rabbit hole of delight. Don't associate me with first ladies blowing their husbands brains out right in front of everyone because of some grainy gov edited video. LOL.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

you've been constantly (trying to) label/brand those who don't buy your/zion.gov's official "hijacked airliner hit pentagon" (HAHP) theory, as suffering from some colorfully-described variety of mental illness. So yes you were speaking to me, and to the majority of the 911 research community who share HAHP disbelief. Now you're disingenuously ducking bobbing & weaving in your denial of this conspicuous truth, insulting every reader's intelligence in the process. :(

A disinformation shill would try to propagate such bologna ^ in a bid to bully weaker minded readers from exploring or discussing with others whatever avenue of inquiry zion.gov/you are seeking to suppress... in this instance, the fact that Arab/Muslims had no significant role in the planning/orchestration of 911, outside of being the patsies designated by the real 911 perps.

joobo, as the self-posturing 'sane & rational' 911 researcher you are, what role if any do you speculate "Arab/Muslim Jihadists" played in 911? :|~





please quote whatever I wrote which triggered your highly tuned waycism-detector... again...???

---

I don't know what you ultimately believe. It could be anything. If that's what you believe then great, but I didn't direct it at you specifically by name.

There is a distinct difference.

So where did the plane go that was heading right for the pentag0n.

Where did it disappear to?

How complicated does it ultimately need to be v.s. just hitting the thing with the airplane already going right there which is all they needed to do.

It had to unfathomably complicated. v.s. excruciatingly simple. It just had to be.

Occam's razor calling...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

How complicated does it ultimately need to be v.s. just hitting the thing with the airplane already going right there which is all they needed to do.

---

joboo, you have a zero comprehension level in aeronautics or physics,

trying to explain to you the difficulties of spearing a boeing nose first down a low slope, into the base of a building, is like trying to teach a 4 year old how to tie his shoes.

Nobody has time for it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

joobo, as the self-posturing 'sane & rational' 911 researcher you are, what role if any do you speculate "Arab/Muslim Jihadists" played in 911? http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/s...20%2820%29.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joobo

You on the other hand....and you make it racist™ on top of it all!

---

please quote whatever I wrote which triggered your highly tuned waycism-detector... again...???

---

joobo, didn't catch your answers to ^, ???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

joobo, didn't catch your answers to ^, ???

---

Go back and take a look.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

joboo, you have a zero comprehension level in aeronautics or physics,

trying to explain to you the difficulties of spearing a boeing nose first down a low slope, into the base of a building, is like trying to teach a 4 year old how to tie his shoes.

Nobody has time for it.

---

I dunno my brother has a masters degree in aerospace engineering, and I did rather well in physics class myself.

What I feel time constrained for is conspiracy theories that form conclusions based on the most contrived realities imaginable v.s. the most simple.

You're going against the official narrative as a complete fabrication from top to bottom, then using the official narrative data again to form a conclusion.

Imo only such much of it could have been realistically faked due to the increasing complexity required.

Could the plane have hit that thing as depicted? I don't know but I do know it would have been very easy to hit it regardless despite how impossible it looks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

but I do know it would have been very easy to hit it regardless despite how impossible it looks.

---

And that's where I can tell you that you are completely wrong, and your brother must have purchased his degree.

It is impossible to the Nth degree, and exactly why those in the know call it that, impossible.

Just as a building falling on to itself without help from an outside force equal to or greater than it.

http://911truthaustralia.com/images/wtc7.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

And that's where I can tell you that you are completely wrong, and your brother must have purchased degree.

It is impossible to the Nth degree, and exactly why those in the know call it that, impossible.

Just as a building falling on to itself without help from an outside force equal to or greater than it.

http://911truthaustralia.com/images/wtc7.gif

---

But you're saying this based on information coming from people that you think are lying to you about everything.

You trust them on this data but everything else is completely fake?