Jesus Christ, The Way, The Truth, and The Life

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IJLQVe_qPM

at about 06:58 on this video track,

about "the brothers and sisters of Jesus"

Here is the answer against that bible question.

Dr. Bergsma explains that neither of these ancient Hebrew and A They just have words for brother and sister and father and mother. As shorthand they just called all their male relatives "brother" and all their female relatives "sister.

Listen to the short video clip.

How Do You Recognize a True Prophet?
5,465 views
Jul 31, 2020
310
Dislike
Share
Save
St. Paul Center
92.9K subscribers
Dr. John Bergsma, author of "Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls", reflects on the mass readings for July 31, 2020.

JER 26:1-9
69:5, 8-10, 14
1 PT 1:25
MT 13:54-58

Learn more about Dr. Bergsma's books at https://bit.ly/2ZXlJPQ

https://vaticancatholic.com/a-short-summary-covering-the-lefts-astounding-hypocrisy-video/

https://vaticancatholic.com/a-short-...pocrisy-video/

4:15 video runtime
https://vaticancatholic.com/images/a...risy-video.jpg

A short summary covering the Left's astounding hypocrisy - video
August 22, 2022

For those interested:

Rick Wiles and Doc Burkhart

https://www.trunews.com/live

one hour video runtime

Rapture vs. Second Coming: Does Jesus Christ Return Once or Twice?

August 23, 2022 TruNews show.



The live video will reload for replay at about 5:00pm Central time

https://trumptrainnews.com/2022/08/2...s-from-a-to-z/

President Trump’s Policy Victories, From A to Z

August 22, 2022
| By: Deroy Murdock

Excerpt

"...Whatever one thinks about President Donald J. Trump’s one-of-a-kind personality, his policies were the most conservative reforms that America has seen since President Ronald Wilson Reagan left office — and perhaps even before he arrived.

Here is a partial list of the wins he secured for individual freedom, personal responsibility, limited government, free enterprise, and peace through strength during one term in the White House. Imagine how many more spectacular things Trump could have done for the American people in just four years if he were not impeded by a totally unhinged Democrat Party, the ferocious news media, the vicious Deep State (including a virulently hostile FBI), and enough Trump-hating lies to stretch Pinocchio’s nose to the size of a javelin.

a) The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act— a massive tax reduction that largely remains in place: Authorized.

b) A 21 percent top-corporate tax rate: Chopped from 35 percent.

c) Eight regulations: Erased — for every new one imposed.

d) Keystone XL Pipeline: Approved.

e) Oil drilling in a small, specific portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Authorized.

f) U.S. energy independence and production dominance: Achieved.

g) Operation Warp Speed’s three COVID-19 vaccines: Delivered in record time via White House collaboration with the private sector.

h) A Right to Try law giving terminally ill patients access to experimental drugs: Enacted.

i) An executive order requiring that new federal buildings be designed in classical Greco-Roman style: Signed.

j) Three constitutionalist justices on the U.S. Supreme Court:Added.

k) Some 200 conservative judges in lower federal courts:Placed.

l) Planned Parenthood: Partially

m) The National March for Life: Addressed in person— a presidential first.

n) Critical Race Theory in federal agencies: Dumped.

o) The Washington, D.C. school voucher program: Reauthorized and funded.

p) Some 8,000 Opportunity Zones to revitalize low-income areas through tax relief and free-market incentives: Activated.

q) About 500 miles of southern-border wall: Constructed.

r) North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA): Replaced withthe U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement — a new-and-improved free-trade pact.

s) Free-trade agreement with South Korea: Launched.

t) Paris Climate Agreement: Abandoned.

u) Iran Nuclear Deal: Ditched.

v) U.S. embassy in Israel: Moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

w) The Abraham Accords — four Middle Eastern peace dealswith Israel and its neighbors: Signed.

x) Islamic State group caliphate: Obliterated.

y) Chinese Communist Party: Confronted, discredited, and sanctioned.

z) American diplomatic prestige and military prowess: Restored and funded.

Donald J. Trump engineered enough victories to match the number of letters in the English alphabet. These 26 policy achievements are all conservative. And there are many more (Space Force! Record-low black and Hispanic unemployment! Due process restored to college campuses!).

Critics correctly argue that Trump’s spending curve should have been flatter. Yes, and he saw higher domestic outlays as the price required to get Congressional Democrats to pay the price for defense modernization.

Trump also could have been more of a free-trader. That said, the sanctions on China were the two-by-fours across the forehead needed to teach Beijing some basic manners about intellectual property theft and other commercial crimes.

This room for improvement notwithstanding, those who claim that President Trump is not a conservative and did not govern as one are either totally ignorant or wildly dishonest.

Fox News Contributor Deroy Murdock writes from Manhattan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8p0-0kvOW4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8p0-0kvOW4

17:49 video runtime

warning @17:32 graphic violence shown

Tucker Carlson: This is a clear indication of things unraveling

223,869 views

Aug 23, 2022

191 car jackings so far this year in New Orleans.


9.83M subscribers
WARNING-Graphic footage: Fox News host Tucker Carlson voices his concerns over national rise in carjackings on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.' #FoxNews #tucker

Remembering Doctor Stan...

https://newswithviews.com/Monteith/I...th_com_hdr.gif

https://newswithviews.com/Monteith/stanley5.htm

THE TRUE STORY OF 9-11
PART 2 of 2

By Dr. Stanley Monteith
June 3, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

My previous article (The True Story of 9/11, Part I) closed with Professor Carroll Quigley�s revelation that:

"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. . . . I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. . . ."[1]

When I researched Colonel House's papers at Yale University, I found a copy of a letter that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt sent Colonel House on November 21, 1933, that contained the following statement:

"I had a nice talk with Jack Morgan the other day. . . . J.P.M. (J.P. Morgan, ed) did not seem much troubled over the gold purchasing. . . . The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson. . . . The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States - - only on a far bigger and broader basis."[2]

[Advertisement: Read Dr. Stanley Montieth's book, "Brotherhood of Darkness"]

Who controls the U.S. government today? Members of David Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers (BdB), the Trilateral Commission (TC), the Club of Rome (CR), leading Masons, occult groups, and the Spiritual Hierarchy that energizes them. I call them the "Brotherhood of Darkness." They control both political parties, the presidency, the mass media, most major banks, most major corporations, and most of the wealth of the world.[3] If that is true, why hasn't someone told the American people? Because most journalists and most media pundits want to keep their jobs, and don't want to end up like Gary Webb, a Pulitzer prize winning columnist who exposed the CIA's involvement in the drug trade, who shot himself in the head twice to make certain he was dead.

Richard Harwood, the former editorial page editor of The Washington Post, tried to expose the CFR's control of our government in 1993 when he wrote:

"The president is a member. So is his secretary of state, the deputy secretary of state, all five of the undersecretaries, several of the assistant secretaries and the department's legal adviser. The president's national security adviser and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The secretary of defense, three undersecretaries and at least four assistant secretaries are members. The secretaries of the departments of housing and urban development, interior, health and human services and the chief White House public relations man, David Gergen, are members, along with the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate."[4]

The Washington Post article continued (October 30, 1993):

"In the past 15 years, council directors have included Hedley Donovan of Time Inc, Elizabeth Drew of the New Yorker, Philip Geyelin of The Washington Post, Karen Elliott House of the Wall Street Journal and Strobe Talbott of Time magazine, who is now President Clinton's ambassador at large in the Slavic world. The editorial page editor, deputy editorial page editor, executive editor, managing editor, foreign editor, national affairs editor, business and financial editor and various writers as well as Katherine Graham, the paper's principal owner, represent The Washington Post in the council's membership. The executive editor, managing editor and foreign editor of the New York Times are members, along with executives of such other large newspapers as the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, the weekly newsmagazines, network television executives and celebrities - Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jim Lehrer, for example - and various columnists, among them Charles Krauthammer, William Buckley, George Will and Jim Hoagland."[5]

Professor Ben Bagdikian's book, The New Media Monopoly, documents the fact that five mega corporations control 90% of the American media. The book is available from Radio Liberty. Lt. General William Odom headed the NSA, the intelligence organization that tracks our phone calls, our e-mails, our faxes, and our activities. The "Secrecy Agreement" he signed prevents him from revealing what is taking place, but his book, Fixing Intelligence (2003) noted:

". . . should the CIA be permitted to carry out assassinations? Should Army Counter- intelligence be involved in domestic surveillance of civilians? Should CIA clandestine officers be allowed to have cover as journalists?"[6]

If those things are taking place, what can we do? Members of the BOD control most media outlets, the police, the military, the government, the religious establishment, and most of the wealth of the world, but they fear the public will learn the truth about the events that took place on 9/11, so they have launched a massive media campaign to convince the public the "official version of 9/11" is correct. The September 11, 2006, issue of U.S. News and World Report published an article that laments:

"Even as conspiracy theories thrived abroad, they mostly fell on deaf ears in the first years after the attacks. But as the fifth anniversary nears, 9/11 Truth and its outlandish claims have become an online phenomenon - and are proving startlingly persuasive. In a July 2006 Scripps Howard poll, 16 percent of respondents said it was 'very likely' that federal officials either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or allowed them to happen to justify war in the Middle East, while a further 20 percent said it was 'somewhat likely.'"[7]

The September 8, 2006 edition of World Affairs Brief states:

"Current polls put the numbers as high as 39% of Americans believe the US government was in some way complicit in the terror attack of 9/11. That's a very high number, surpassed only by the percentage of people that disbelieve the official government version about the assassination of JFK - 69%."[8]

Joel Skousen cited a recent article in the UK Daily Mail that states:

"The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an 'inside job,' according to a group of leading academics. Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries. The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday. But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated."[9]

Millions of Americans saw the C-Span broadcast of the "American Scholars Symposium," and learned about the 9/11 military exercises that simulated terrorist hijackings, and the fact that most of the fighter planes that were supposed to guard Washington, D.C. that morning were participating in military exercises in Canada.[10]

The U.S. News and World Report article continued:

"There are some divergent strands among the conspiracy theorists, but for most of them, the story has two major tenets: The World Trade Center towers and nearby Building 7, though struck by planes, were brought down by controlled demolitions, and the Pentagon was struck by a missile, not a plane."[11]

Why did the author suggest Building 7 was struck by a plane? No plane struck Building 7, and no reinforced steel building has ever collapsed because of a fire. You can watch the professionally controlled collapse of Building 7 at: [Read].

The Bush administration tried to block the effort to determine what happened because they claimed a lengthy investigation would "detract from the war on terrorism." When that argument failed to dissuade the public, the BOD organized two investigations: "The Joint Intelligence Committee" and the "9/11 Commission."

The Joint Intelligence Committee didn't try to determine why Building 7 collapsed because both Senator Bob Graham and Congressman Porter Goss, the co-chairmen of the committee, are members of the CFR. In addition, the Bush administration censored the report.[12]

The 9/11 Commission didn't determine why Building 7 collapsed because the Chairman, Thomas Kean, the vice-Chairman, Lee Hamilton, two members, Jamie Gorelick and John Lehman, and the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, are members of the CFR.[13] Former Senator Max Cleland was a member, but when it became obvious he wouldn't participate in the charade, he was replaced. Again, the Bush administration censored the report.[14] Since there are almost 300 million people living in the U.S., and there are only 4000 members of the CFR, do you honestly believe the CFR's control of both investigations was an accident?



THE TRUE STORY OF 9-11
PART 2 of 2





By Dr. Stanley Monteith
June 3, 2007
NewsWithViews.com

My previous article (The True Story of 9/11, Part I) closed with Professor Carroll Quigley�s revelation that:

"There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. . . . I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. . . ."[1]

When I researched Colonel House's papers at Yale University, I found a copy of a letter that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt sent Colonel House on November 21, 1933, that contained the following statement:

"I had a nice talk with Jack Morgan the other day. . . . J.P.M. (J.P. Morgan, ed) did not seem much troubled over the gold purchasing. . . . The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson. . . . The country is going through a repetition of Jackson's fight with the Bank of the United States - - only on a far bigger and broader basis."[2]

[Advertisement: Read Dr. Stanley Montieth's book, "Brotherhood of Darkness"]

Who controls the U.S. government today? Members of David Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderbergers (BdB), the Trilateral Commission (TC), the Club of Rome (CR), leading Masons, occult groups, and the Spiritual Hierarchy that energizes them. I call them the "Brotherhood of Darkness." They control both political parties, the presidency, the mass media, most major banks, most major corporations, and most of the wealth of the world.[3] If that is true, why hasn't someone told the American people? Because most journalists and most media pundits want to keep their jobs, and don't want to end up like Gary Webb, a Pulitzer prize winning columnist who exposed the CIA's involvement in the drug trade, who shot himself in the head twice to make certain he was dead.

Richard Harwood, the former editorial page editor of The Washington Post, tried to expose the CFR's control of our government in 1993 when he wrote:

"The president is a member. So is his secretary of state, the deputy secretary of state, all five of the undersecretaries, several of the assistant secretaries and the department's legal adviser. The president's national security adviser and his deputy are members. The director of Central Intelligence (like all previous directors) and the chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board are members. The secretary of defense, three undersecretaries and at least four assistant secretaries are members. The secretaries of the departments of housing and urban development, interior, health and human services and the chief White House public relations man, David Gergen, are members, along with the speaker of the House and the majority leader of the Senate."[4]

The Washington Post article continued (October 30, 1993):

"In the past 15 years, council directors have included Hedley Donovan of Time Inc, Elizabeth Drew of the New Yorker, Philip Geyelin of The Washington Post, Karen Elliott House of the Wall Street Journal and Strobe Talbott of Time magazine, who is now President Clinton's ambassador at large in the Slavic world. The editorial page editor, deputy editorial page editor, executive editor, managing editor, foreign editor, national affairs editor, business and financial editor and various writers as well as Katherine Graham, the paper's principal owner, represent The Washington Post in the council's membership. The executive editor, managing editor and foreign editor of the New York Times are members, along with executives of such other large newspapers as the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, the weekly newsmagazines, network television executives and celebrities - Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jim Lehrer, for example - and various columnists, among them Charles Krauthammer, William Buckley, George Will and Jim Hoagland."[5]

Professor Ben Bagdikian's book, The New Media Monopoly, documents the fact that five mega corporations control 90% of the American media. The book is available from Radio Liberty. Lt. General William Odom headed the NSA, the intelligence organization that tracks our phone calls, our e-mails, our faxes, and our activities. The "Secrecy Agreement" he signed prevents him from revealing what is taking place, but his book, Fixing Intelligence (2003) noted:

". . . should the CIA be permitted to carry out assassinations? Should Army Counter- intelligence be involved in domestic surveillance of civilians? Should CIA clandestine officers be allowed to have cover as journalists?"[6]

If those things are taking place, what can we do? Members of the BOD control most media outlets, the police, the military, the government, the religious establishment, and most of the wealth of the world, but they fear the public will learn the truth about the events that took place on 9/11, so they have launched a massive media campaign to convince the public the "official version of 9/11" is correct. The September 11, 2006, issue of U.S. News and World Report published an article that laments:

"Even as conspiracy theories thrived abroad, they mostly fell on deaf ears in the first years after the attacks. But as the fifth anniversary nears, 9/11 Truth and its outlandish claims have become an online phenomenon - and are proving startlingly persuasive. In a July 2006 Scripps Howard poll, 16 percent of respondents said it was 'very likely' that federal officials either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or allowed them to happen to justify war in the Middle East, while a further 20 percent said it was 'somewhat likely.'"[7]

The September 8, 2006 edition of World Affairs Brief states:

"Current polls put the numbers as high as 39% of Americans believe the US government was in some way complicit in the terror attack of 9/11. That's a very high number, surpassed only by the percentage of people that disbelieve the official government version about the assassination of JFK - 69%."[8]

Joel Skousen cited a recent article in the UK Daily Mail that states:

"The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an 'inside job,' according to a group of leading academics. Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries. The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday. But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated."[9]

Millions of Americans saw the C-Span broadcast of the "American Scholars Symposium," and learned about the 9/11 military exercises that simulated terrorist hijackings, and the fact that most of the fighter planes that were supposed to guard Washington, D.C. that morning were participating in military exercises in Canada.[10]

The U.S. News and World Report article continued:

"There are some divergent strands among the conspiracy theorists, but for most of them, the story has two major tenets: The World Trade Center towers and nearby Building 7, though struck by planes, were brought down by controlled demolitions, and the Pentagon was struck by a missile, not a plane."[11]

Why did the author suggest Building 7 was struck by a plane? No plane struck Building 7, and no reinforced steel building has ever collapsed because of a fire. You can watch the professionally controlled collapse of Building 7 at: [Read].

The Bush administration tried to block the effort to determine what happened because they claimed a lengthy investigation would "detract from the war on terrorism." When that argument failed to dissuade the public, the BOD organized two investigations: "The Joint Intelligence Committee" and the "9/11 Commission."

The Joint Intelligence Committee didn't try to determine why Building 7 collapsed because both Senator Bob Graham and Congressman Porter Goss, the co-chairmen of the committee, are members of the CFR. In addition, the Bush administration censored the report.[12]

The 9/11 Commission didn't determine why Building 7 collapsed because the Chairman, Thomas Kean, the vice-Chairman, Lee Hamilton, two members, Jamie Gorelick and John Lehman, and the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, are members of the CFR.[13] Former Senator Max Cleland was a member, but when it became obvious he wouldn't participate in the charade, he was replaced. Again, the Bush administration censored the report.[14] Since there are almost 300 million people living in the U.S., and there are only 4000 members of the CFR, do you honestly believe the CFR's control of both investigations was an accident?

I will continue my discussion of the 9/11 attack, and the coming war with Iran, in Part III of this article. If we can convince the American people they haven't been told the truth about the events that took place on 9/11, we may be able to prevent World War III, and preserve our nation.

The current situation reminds me of Martin Luther's immortal words,


"A mighty fortress is our God, A bulwark never failing; Our helper He, amid the flood Of mortal ills prevailing: For still our ancient foe Doth seek to work us woe; His craft and power are great, And, armed with cruel hate, On earth is not his equal."(14)

I believe we are engaged in a spiritual battle for the souls of men and the survival of Christian civilization. Our task is to do our best. For part 1 click below.

Click here for part -----> 1, 2, 3,

Dachsie comment:

Very interesting. This was originally produced and posted on YouTube in 2018. I provided a brief summary of Father Ripperger's education at end.

____________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnVG5yiaO7k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnVG5yiaO7k


38:17 video runtime

[SIZE=3]Dangers of Modern Psychology ~ Father Chad Ripperger * [/SIZE]

Sensus Fidelium
222K subscribers
Why modern pyschology is dangerous. The history behind psychology. For more sermons & lectures please visit
http://sensustraditionis.org/ & remember to do the PenanceWare Fr asks for

Fr Ripperger's order of exorcists http://dolorans.org/

The website https://sensusfidelium.us/
To donate please visit https://sensusfidelium.us/donate-supp...

Donations to Sensus Fidelium is 501(c)3 tax deductibleFor his book on Psychology http://www.sensustraditionis.org/psyc...

___________________

* Father Ripperger was born in Casper, Wyoming on October 11, 1964. He earned two bachelor's degrees, in theology and philosophy, from the University of San Francisco; and two master's degrees, one in philosophy from the Center for Thomistic Studies of the University of St. Thomas in Houston, Texas, and another in theology from Holy Apostles College and Seminary in Cromwell, Connecticut. He joined the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), which sent him to Rome to receive his doctorate in philosophy from the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross
Wikipedia

_______________________

Dachsie comment:

Father Ripperger said two times in this video that your thoughts can alter you physical brain structure. I call that very interesting.

I was always taught that we can sin in our thoughts, words, and deeds. So it is wise for one's spiritual welfare to avoid situations, places and things that cause your thoughts to lead to immoral actions and pathways. Sounds right to me.

https://jermwarfare.com/podcast/james-fetzer-sandy-hook

go to link above to play 2 embedded videos and the podcast

James Fetzer on the Sandy Hook coverup
What actually happened at the school, and was it a false flag operation to usher in stricter gun laws?

JermBy Jerm25 Aug 2022

[/SIZE]
https://jermwarfare.com/wp-content/u...k-1200x675.jpg

James Fetzer is a researcher who was previously on my podcast in which he discussed the JFK assassination coverup.

I enjoy a good conspiracy as much as the next theorist, and have welcomed some pretty eye-opening conversations in recent months, from Marilyn Monroe to 9/11 to the Titanic, but this one about Sandy Hook is absolutely next level.
Was Alex Jones right?

After reading the memoranda that compose this series, how could anyone doubt that Alex had it right and the mainstream media had it wrong? That the vilification of Alex has no basis in fact and appears to be a massive propaganda campaign on behalf of the Deep State? At this point in time – with massive and compelling evidence available – what remains up for debate? Nothing! As he observed, it was a hoax.
James Fetzer, circa 2018

James reckons that Alex was right all along, despite all the legal and political backgammon currently being played.

The jury’s decision Friday came the day after it awarded the parents of slain first grader $4.1 million for mental anguish, bringing the total damages against the InfoWars founder to $49.3 million.
NPR, circa 2022

As James notes in our conversation, the “slain first grader” doesn’t exist. Or, rather, he does exist, but not in the way the mainstream narrative has been constructed.
What actually happened?

I don’t know.

But, once again, trusting the legitimacy of official stories is not a good strategy in piecing together puzzles. And being labelled a “conspiracy theorist” is empty and just an attempt to discredit, silence critical thinking, and perpetuate established views. Ignore such labels.

[IMG]Share. Telegram WhatsApp Facebook Twitter Email[/IMG]

The Sandy Hook school.

And when censorship becomes the dominating force, like in the case with this particular event, alarm bells should ring. After all, why would “crazy conspiracy theories” need to be censored if they’re clearly crap? And why would people need to be protected and sheltered from them?

The following documentary (which, obviously, is not on YouTube) is long but superb.

embedded video 2:46:43 video runtime

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...rminaveXIQ--~D
Our conversation

James showed some photos in this podcast, so watching it might be preferable to listening to it. He covers a lot of ground, including questions around

the absence of blood;
the car park;
broken windows;
furniture;
actors and fake identities; and
gun laws.

One needs a strong drink for this one.

embedded video 1:33:21 video runtime on odysee

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...koF9Vs0Sfw--~D

Please support Jerm's work by joining our community of like-minded people from around the world.

Jerm

Website
Twitter

I'm a political cartoonist; I am a podcast host; and I have my own international talk radio show. My wife and I live in Cape Town (South Africa) with our pets and alcohol.

RELATED WARFARE

attorney Jeff Childers gives more inside story on the Mar a Lago and affidavit matter.


excerpt:

🔥 As I’m sure you’ve already heard, the Affidavit is heavily redacted:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...7_1178x660.png

That’s not surprising, we expected heavy redaction. The Affidavit’s introduction, which contains a bunch of conclusory statements about probable cause, defamatory remarks about Trump, and the early case timeline, is mostly intact. But in every single instance where the FBI cited to any FACT that could support the Affidavit, that fact is completely redacted.

Because of this, possibly the most important thing to know about the Affidavit is that there are NO FACTS supporting the need for the raid. We must assume that some relevant facts are concealed in the redacted parts. In other words, the redacted Affidavit does NOT establish probable cause for the raid, which was what everyone was waiting to see.

SNIP Read the entire thing HERE. Educational and entertaining.


...

🔥 Finally, President Trump’s characteristic response:
Twitter avatar for @HarrisonKrank██████ ████ @HarrisonKrank
Trumps response to the redacted affidavit.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...sKUsAEzeLm.jpg

August 27th 2022

nice rant about the resident's student load forgiveness proposal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98UiNexZgZk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98UiNexZgZk

11:24 video runtime

Who I Blame For The STUDENT LOAN FIASCO

Aug 26, 2022


Living On A Dime To Grow Rich