Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

Shawna Cox: What America Needs To Know About the Bunkerville Trial


Shawna Cox: What America needs to know about the Bunkerville trial


DOZENS OF PEOPLE FILED COMPLAINTS WITH THE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE AGAINST ALL THE FEDERAL AGENTS WHO POINTED GUNS AND THREATENED TO KILL ALL THE UNARMED AMERICANS PROTESTING UNDER THE TOQUAP BRIDGE.

March 30, 2017 BLM, Constitution, Featured, Nevada 4

http://www.avantlink.com/gbi/11653/2...9211/image.jpg

https://i1.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=641%2C360

Shawna Cox: What America needs to know
about the Bunkerville trial

Dear America,
Federal Court in Las Vegas, Nevada: March 22, 2017 during the “Cliven Bundy Trial #1,” the federal prosecutors were still putting on their case. This would be the 22nd day of trial since it began on Feb. 6, 2017. In cross examination of one of the federal agents, the only Pro Se Defendant, Todd Engel, asked the agent if it was true that the Special Agent in charge, Daniel P. Love of the BLM, was under investigation for misconduct. (Remember “Burning Man”?)

The witness did not answer the question before the prosecution immediately jumped to their feet and objected. After all, the defendants were not allowed to talk about the main character in the whole Bundy Standoff. The prosecution has raised his name a number of times but only in the light that is most favorable for them. Judge Navarro immediately sent the jury out of the room. It was time for a break anyway. The prosecutors demanded that Mr. Engel be stripped of his Pro Se status. After a few moments of thought, the Judge agreed to strip Todd of his Pro Se but just for the rest of the day. (I believe she was trying to figure out a way to do it.)

The 6^th Amendment provides “to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” Of which, Todd’s counsel was fired because of falling asleep in hearings, no communication with defendant, no knowledge of the case, refusing to ask the questions put before him of the defendant, only performing when others are looking over his shoulder or trying to assist his client, etc. This would now leave Mr. Engel with no defense!

Judge Navarro did make the ruling to strip Todd’s Pro Se status the very next day.

The same afternoon during cross examination of FBI Agent Caputo, the sage attorney, T. Jackson who represents Greg Burleson, asked the agent if he had worked with Greg Burleson before. “Yes.” When? “2012 – 2013.” So… you could say Greg Burleson was working as a paid informant in 2012-2013? “Um…Yes, we were working on a murder case.” What happened to him in 2103? “I handed him off.”

The audience were in shock with jaws dropping. A few other questions followed, and then the last questions of the day…Who did you hand him off to? “Agent Nixon.” The same Agent Nixon that just testified in this trial the yesterday? “Ah…(looking to the Prosecutors for help)…Ah, Yes.”

So now it is obvious to all of us that Greg Burleson was and has been a paid informant for the FBI for a few years, and now he has been in jail sitting in with the defendants during their client/attorney meetings etc. The defendants are sure this is the basis for a “mistrial” and this information just confirmed what they felt all along: Greg Burleson had a different reason to come to the ranch than all the rest of them.

The next day the Judge acted like nothing happened the day before and waved it off like nothing to see here…move along. The prosecution even went so far as to play all of the Longbow (FBI fake film company interview with Burleson–terrible and overly dramatized! They even showed all of his Facebook posts afterwards, which are boisterous, obnoxious, filled with bad language, and not the spirit that everyone else was feeling there. These fake narratives were used to ramp up the hysteria about the militia and the protests and to sway public opinion.

We just want to tell the truth, so why can’t the media go into court and show the world what really goes on in these Federal Courts? Why are they only allowed to take notes and draw pictures? The defendants want an open court and have asked for it but the Judge still refuses media access. The information that goes out by way of the major media is only a spin because their reporters don’t even stay in the courtroom the whole day. They report things of very little concern and try to keep the public in the dark.

This is criminal!

All the while they keep the Bundy men and all the real patriots, locked up with no bail and no relief. They are treated worse than if they were already found guilty of some horrible crime. These judges, along with many other politically motivated people, have created a conspiracy against We the People.

https://i1.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=600%2C475

Harry Reid’s Role
Senator Harry Reid, in April 2014, called all the people at the Bundy Ranch Standoff “Domestic Terrorists” because we exposed his and his son, Rory Reid’s, land deal with China. They had a contract with a company from China to sell the Nevada land Cliven Bundy has been grazing on for over 150 years, for pennies on the dollar. Makes you wonder how politicians go into office to serve and come out filthy rich.
Judge Navarro has a conflict of interest and should have recused herself from this trial.

In 2009 she was working as an attorney for the Clark County Commission with Rory Reid as one of those commissioners. Her husband, Brian Rutledge, was also working in the county and is still working as the District Attorney.

In 2009, Judge Navarro was recommended by Rory Reid a Clark County Commissioner, whom she worked with, to be nominated by (his father) Harry Reid to President Obama to become the Chief Judge in the US District Court of Nevada here in Las Vegas. Harry contacted Governor Brian Sandoval to replace Judge Robert C Jones and Gloria Navarro was appointed on January 1, 2014.

Judge Robert C Jones was demoted at that time probably because he was the Judge who sat on the Wayne Hage case and saw the injustice and out of control BLM and the Hage Case won in court. Her appointment bypassed all the experienced Judges who worked their way to the top and placed a young woman with very little experience, to be their master.

April 19, 2015 Chief US District Judge Gloria Navarro assigned the Hage case to herself and in September 2015 the Wayne Hage case was overturned. She is BIASED and should have recused herself from this Bundy Case. Harry Reid has been placing these people in office to further his own agenda.

She also should have recused herself from this Bundy Case because it is a conflict of interest with her husband, Brian Rutledge was the District Attorney who failed to prosecute anyone after the standoff and dozens of people filed complaints with the County Sheriff’s Office against all the Federal Agents who pointed guns and threatened to kill all the unarmed Americans protesting under the Toquap Bridge that day of April 12, 2014.

Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a federal judge under certain circumstances.

In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge’s impartiality. If a judge’s attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified.”

Just like Harry did with Neil Kornze, the former head of the Bureau of Land Management in the Obama Administration. Neil had been tutored as Harry’s personal secretary. Two days before the assault at the Bundy Ranch in 2014, Harry Reid made Neil the head of the BLM. There were a lot of disgruntled people who had been working their way to the top for years with lots of good experience and were bypassed by this young man through the influence again of Harry Reid. Harry needed someone to do his dirty work.


Related Articles:
Identity of paid FBI informant unintentionally disclosed during Bunkerville trial

Recordings show paranoid, abusive attitudes of federal agents during Bundy Ranch standoff

Why Trump’s new BLM director must fire Dan Love

http://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/up...3/shawna-2.jpe
Shawna Cox is a native born Utahan. She is a very active wife, mother and grandmother. She has been politically involved for over 40 years. She stood up for her Cowgirl friend Mary Bullock Rucker when the BLM and environmental groups came after her and her cattle in 1996.

She went to Bunkerville to help her friend Cliven Bundy and his family when they came for his cattle and offered the prayer under the bridge. Then believing in Ammon Bundy’s will to serve the Lord, she went to Harney County, Oregon to help the Dwight Hammond Family when they came for his Ranch. She was in the truck when LaVoy Finicum was murdered and was a defendant in the First Oregon Trial, where miraculously they were all acquitted.

She has been helping all the other defendants ever since and can’t go home until they too are all freemen again. They are innocent of any wrong doing. May God Bless us all to restore our Constitution!

H/T Free Range Report

An Important Update from John Lamb and Andrea Olson-Parker April 3

Court is over for today, there will be a final report shortly

http://youtu.be/S5TYUh0iXX0

https://youtu.be/S5TYUh0iXX0

A couple of belated interviews with Briana Bundy Jim Lamb on Twister radio

http://ice9.securenetsystems.net/med...on-Updates.m4a March 22

Unjust Judge in Nevada
March 23

End of Day - No Defense Witnesses Allowed. John Lamb and Andrea Olson-Parker

http://youtu.be/AsVJQFu_hO8

https://youtu.be/AsVJQFu_hO8

John Lamb & Andrea Parker ~ No defense witnesses! 4/3/17


J Grady 56 views

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-xB-1eH_M5GM/A...ffff/photo.jpg
SUBSCRIBE

2,866

5

0
Published on Apr 3, 2017We need everyone to pick up their phones NOW! US Department of Justice AJ Jeff Sessions 1( 202) 514-1555 Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

• Category
  
  • News & Politics
  
  
• License
  
  • Standard YouTube License

Brand Thornton with more from the April 3 Nevada courtroom proceedings

http://youtu.be/ugeEfZ5X5Z0

https://youtu.be/ugeEfZ5X5Z0

The Bundy Women April 3, 2017

http://youtu.be/akwy6H6DGRo

https://youtu.be/akwy6H6DGRo

Bundy Ranch ~ The Bundy Women 4/3/17


J Grady 4 views

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-xB-1eH_M5GM/A...ffff/photo.jpg
SUBSCRIBE

2,865

0

0
Published on Apr 3, 2017 Chief Judge Gloria Navarro complaint line:702 388 5020
Admin Aaron Blazevich: 1-702-464-542

InspectorGeneral Investigations Division. 202-616-4760

Social media blast twitter and Facebook event already been going on. Help from home. Show up at court if you can. From home link. https://www.facebook.com/events/62419...

Judiciary Committee members. 202 225 3951 (comment line option or speak to staff)

Copyright Disclaimer:
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

• Category
  
  • News & Politics
  
  
• License
  
  • Standard YouTube License

COMMENTS

4/3/17 Happenings Today in Nevada: Court Update- Clouds Moving In MrsB Stacy channel

http://youtu.be/xvU6acycY_w

https://youtu.be/xvU6acycY_w

Brand Thornton and John Lamb with more thoughts on today's court in Las Vegas ~ J Grady

http://youtu.be/T9Ehkz7XdVI

https://youtu.be/T9Ehkz7XdVI

John Bad Elk v United States

Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest


“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.”

Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”


“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.


“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.


“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).

“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).

“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all ... it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistad by Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.

As for grounds for arrest: “The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” (Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197).

You are also within your rights not to answer any questions without a lawyer present, and if possible, to demand a video recording be made of the entire encounter that you or your lawyer keep as evidence, so that federal prosecutors can't get away with charging you with making false statements to a government investigator and testilying about what you said. See this article.

---

As a practical matter one should try to avoid relying on the above in an actual confrontation with law enforcement agents, who are likely not to know or care about any of it. Some recent courts have refused to follow these principles, and grand juries, controlled by prosecutors, have refused to indict officers who killed innocent people claiming the subject "resisted" or "looked like he might have a gun". Once dedicated to "protect and serve", far too many law enforcement officers have become brutal, lawless occupying military forces.

So the people should bust the Bundy's and Co out of the slammer?

Maureen "Ssg. Moe" Peltier, Where are all you Sons of Liberty? Emotional video asking support for the Bundy trial in Las Vegas. The Facebook Video at link

https://www.facebook.com/10000456952...PAGES_TIMELINE

Maureen Peltier was live.

9 hrs ·

CALL TO ACTION: Calling all and calling on Sons of Liberty to get to work. I will arrive in Neveda tomorrow morning and be brought to Las Vegas. District Court NLT 8am

Please join us all. If not now.....when....~SSG Moe

If you are not able to come and be a court room observer this week there are many other ways you can show your support!
Please send a letter of concern to Jeff Sessions immediately:

https://www.justice.gov/…/w…/your-message-department-justice
Or call the DOJ comment line at: 202-353-1555

Please be respectful and inform him of the Constitutional violations taking place in this Federal courtroom.

Also, you can call or email the local news media and see if they will show up to cover the trial this week. We will include a list of violations you can copy and past if you'd like.

Channel 8/KLAS-TV 1-702-792-8888

To send them a message go to: www.lasvegas.now.com

To contact Judicial Watch, you can message them on fb or call them at:
1-202-464-5172

It seems like at critical times my audio cuts out is garbled and I can't make out what they are saying.

It is like there is a jewtube censor between me and what they are saying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

It seems like at critical times my audio cuts out is garbled and I can't make out what they are saying.

It is like there is a jewtube censor between me and what they are saying.

---

The audio does cut out. One of the comments was speculation the feds or jewtube were interfering with the audio.

Judge Navarro shutting down the defense


Shutting Down The Defense – UPDATES on Bunkerville Trial


THE GOVERNMENT PROSECUTORS HAVE SAID THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE PRESENTED THAT THE BLM SHOWED OR USED FORCE, AND JUDGE GLORIA NAVARRO AGREED.

April 3, 2017 BLM, Constitution, Featured, Nevada 4

http://www.avantlink.com/gbi/11653/2...9211/image.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=640%2C381

UPDATES on Bunkerville Trial
Shutting Down The Defense

by Shari Dovale

With the reports coming out if the courtroom in Las Vegas, Nevada, it is obvious that the defendants will not be allowed a fair trial.
Some of the key testimony the defense was planning has been denied them. They intended to bring in Margaret Houston, Cliven Bundy’s sister, who was thrown to the ground by the BLM agent. The defendants were told that her testimony is not relevant to this case and Houston will not be allowed to testify.

http://youtu.be/-sPWeqeFzcU

The government prosecutors have said that there has been no evidence presented that the BLM showed or used force, and Judge Gloria Navarro agreed. She has ruled that the defense cannot present testimony that the BLM overstepped their bounds or used unnecessary force, such as the testimony of Margaret Houston.

Judge Navarro has also ruled that evidence of Dave Bundy’s arrest will not be allowed. Neither will the evidence of the BLM tazing Ammon Bundy repeatedly, or the evidence of the BLM killing the Bundy cattle.

Navarro also reiterated that Special Agent Dan Love will not be called to testify, and his current investigation into his illegal activities while in charge of the operations in Nevada were not to be brought into court.

Judge Navarro has ruled that all of this evidence is not relevant to the current case and can only confuse the jury. She and the prosecutors discussed, repeatedly today, that they are concerned that ‘Jury Nullification” could become an issue in this trial. Navarro is not going to allow any evidence in front of the jury that could sway the jury to nullify.

Navarro has also ruled that you do not need to point a weapon at an officer for it to be an assault on that officer. Merely having a weapon that the officer can see is enough to be considered assault on that officer.

WITNESS INTIMIDATION
It was made clear today that any witnesses that are allowed to testify for the defense will be required to first talk to the judge and then talk to a court-appointed attorney, as their testimony could likely get them prosecuted.

Attorney Jackson got up and said that if the government is threatening the witnesses with charges if they testify then that is grounds for a dismissal. Navarro did not agree and dismissed that motion.

The government repeatedly made note that this case was a part of an “ongoing investigation” and the government will not discuss who else is under investigation. They seem to be waving the “UN-indicted co-conspirator” flag at anyone that supports the defense. But, there are still people that are willing to testify, if Judge Navarro would allow them to do so.

All of the prosecutions dozens of witnesses were labeled as “experts, regardless of whether or not they were physically at the wash on that eventful day. Even the agents that were only looking at Facebook, memes and posts.

However, the defense is not allowed the same. If a defense witness was at the wash, saw with their own eyes the events as they happened, they are being labeled by the court as “3^rd party” or “LAY” witnesses, therefore their testimony is seemingly unreliable. Additionally, lay witnesses are being denied the right to testify because of this, as well as being told they might be prosecuted.
When it was discussed about Metro police, Highway Patrol, etc, the judge amended her stance to include those law enforcement officials, as well. I wonder if any of the defense witnesses are active or retired law enforcement? Would that qualify them?

Another issue the judge has stressed is that the “lay” witnesses are not allowed to discuss their fear. Only the BLM is allowed to discuss whether they feared for their life, the witnesses are not afforded the right to tell the whole truth.

It is painfully obvious that Judge Navarro, between everything we heard this morning, and the limited time she has allowed the defense to present it’s case, she is trying to manipulate the defense into forcing the defendants to testify against themselves.

The defendants are Constitutionally guaranteed a fair trial, with rights to face their accusers, etc. They are being denied these rights. Remember what Navarro told Todd Engel:

“You, as a defendant, have only THREE rights.”
She said that he had the right to:

1. Plead Guilty
2. Testify on his own behalf
3. Appeal his conviction

John Lamb and Andrea Parker update on this morning’s proceedings:

Judge openly laughs at defendants rights


Judge Openly LAUGHS At Defendants Rights


THE HEAVY-HANDED JUDGE HAS RULED THESE MEN DO NOT DESERVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES.

April 3, 2017 BLM, Constitution, DOJ, Featured, Nevada 1

http://www.avantlink.com/gbi/11653/2...9211/image.jpg

https://i1.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=641%2C360

Judge Openly LAUGHS At Defendants Rights

By Shari Dovale

Judge Gloria Navarro made a mockery of the judicial system today.

The first Bunkerville trial is underway in Las Vegas, Nevada. The prosecution has had over five weeks to present their case. Now that the defense is ready to put on their case, Judge Gloria Navarro has shut them down.

Out of the entire witness list, there is one witness, other than the defendants, that she will allow to testify. Garrett Frenner was a witness to the slaughter of the Bundy cattle. However, Judge Navarro will not allow him to testify to those events. The prosecutors and the FBI spent a couple of hours harassing this man, threatening him with prosecution if he dared to testify. She has made it clear that he can ONLY testify to which of the defendants he saw with guns.

Every witness that the defense tried to proffer today was questioned by the Judge. She stressed to each one of them that she was ready to have them removed from the courtroom in handcuffs, if she thinks they are committing perjury.

Judge Navarro then backed up the prosecution when they threatened witnesses by naming them as “UNindicted Co-conspirators”. Navarro allowed this bullying, and took part in it herself.

After the intimidation of their witness, the defense believes he has been compromised and stated they are unsure of calling him as a witness. This made Eric Parker so distraught and upset that they have no witnesses for their defense that he broke down and cried in the courtroom. This, of course, made his wife and supporters cry as well.

Judge Navarro showed no sympathy. Reports are that she actually laughed out loud at their distress. The prosecutors also laughed and joked at the defense. She continued to reiterate that they have no rights as defendants.

Navarro also stated in the courtroom that no one is guaranteed their first amendment rights or their second amendment rights. Additionally, she told everyone that there is Never a time when anyone is allowed to defend themselves against a Law Enforcement Officer, even if they caught him breaking into their home. If he even sees a gun near them, they are guilty of assaulting him.

The defense had plans to call numerous witnesses, including Carole Bundy, Shawna Cox, Michele Fiore and more. Judge Navarro refused to allow them to testify because she feels their testimony might risk her jury to nullify.

Jury Nullification is her worst fear. She continues to tell the defense that she will not allow them to put on any defense that might sway her jury to nullify. This includes any information of why these men came to Bunkerville, the abuses of the BLM agents, and more.

Judge Navarro is quoted as saying, “The risk of jury nullification… for the jurors to hear about different defense witnesses, that can’t happen!” Navarro mentioned this at least three times during the day.

When the defense team attempted to object, she shut them down again, saying “Don’t bother to object.” as she intendeds to side with the prosecution each time.

And she carried through with this threat, not allowing the defense any leeway at all.

Dan Love was the Special Agent in Charge of the operation in Bunkerville, and his testimony was the main evidence in front of the Grand Jury. However, because he is under investigation for abuses, Judge Navarro has ruled his testimony is irrelevant and will not allow him to be called to testify.

Eric Parker has now decided that he has no choice but to testify. He may very well be the only witness in the defense case. This case could end up in the jury’s hands as early as tomorrow.

The heavy-handed judge has ruled these men do not deserve the right to defend themselves.
Bundy Ladies:

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=569%2C307
John Lamb and Andrea Parker:

This Redoubt News Article by Shari Dovale got so many hits the server is down

http://redoubtnews.com/2017/04/03/ju...ndants-rights/

Loren Pearce's visit with Bundys


https://www.facebook.com/groups/8500...0734064698858/
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...a0&oe=595549C5


Loren Pearce

April 2 at 9:30pm
MY VISIT WITH RYAN BUNDY, DAVE BUNDY AND THE BUNDY FAMILY

On my way to Las Vegas, I stopped at the Bundy ranch and was pleased to find out that I had timed it right, as most of the wives and the children were at the ranch for an early Easter celebration. I was received with the hospitality and good natures for which the Bundys are famous. I was impressed with the sense of optimism and good attitude that pervades a home and ranch that is run by women and minor children and one brother in law (I think) while their men folk languish in prison. The youngest son, Arden, who was running the ranch, is now on an LDS mission in Chile.

It is a beautiful time of the year, the ranch has been blessed with abundant rain and the desert is “blossoming like a rose”. I had a chance to go up on a mesa overlooking the ranch and the Virgin River that runs next to the ranch and behold the breathtaking scenery and sunset. I drove by the site where the protest in 2014 took place and where the flag poles are still there with a few of the signs. I assume that one of the flags is at half mast in honor of LaVoy Finicum. I got to meet another LaVoy, one of Cliven and Carol’s little grandsons, named after the martyr.

I asked Lisa Bundy if it was alright to visit Ammon at the Nevada Southern Detention Center in Pahrump as they are only allowed one visit per week and I did not want to rob any family member of that visit. She said it would be alright so I drove out Sunday morning and asked to visit him. He refused. Turns out that everytime they visit somebody over the computer monitor, they must go through a strip/cavity search and Ammon was not willing to do that unless it was close family. Now, knowing that this is a modern, hi tech prison, I am sure there is a logical explanation for this. Maybe I missed it, but there must be some way to pass contraband through the computer screen. The sound quality was horrible.

I then asked to see Ryan Bundy. I was told he will refuse also, like Ammon, but I asked them to try anyway. To my delight, he accepted and we were able to visit for over an hour. Ryan asked me to share with those who will listen, some of the following points:

1. The presumption of innocence until proven guilty is dead. Someone who is innocent and who has never been convicted should not be treated the way he is in solitary confinement. His toilet still does not work and he does not have toilet paper.

2. He asked, “Where are our elected officials? Why are they not doing something about this travesty of justice? Why are they just ignoring a situation that is happening to thousands of prisoners in a similar situation, never convicted and waiting months and years for a trial?”

3. Ryan had researched the Bail Reform Act of 1984 and learned that it was never passed by congress and was made into a resolution, not an act. A resolution is temporary. Yet, the federal courts rely on the Bail Reform Act to throw people like the Bundys into pretrial detention.

4. Ryan reminded us that our rights do not flow from government but that they are God given. The Bill of Rights do not grant rights, they are meant to remind government of the obvious, because government tends to forget who is the tail and who is the dog.

5. We talked about the right to bail being necessary to prepare a defense. Ryan is severely limited in his ability to adequately research and prepare his defense in an environment where he has no access to the internet nor adequate tools for writing.

6. Finally, Ryan said that his faith that they were prompted by the Lord to do what they did in Oregon and Nevada is unshakeable and is what gives him hope that justice will be served. They were acquitted in Oregon because the government could not prove wrong doing and the same thing will happen in Nevada.

I then had the privilege to meet with Dave Bundy for an hour, over the same computer screen and horrible sound quality. Behind Dave was his father Cliven talking to another gentleman. Dave asked me to tell you that they are deeply grateful for all the demonstrations of support, for the letters, the rallies and most of all the prayers. He knows that people, and even children, are praying for them and they get strength from those prayers in spite of the horrible situation. A very old man was wheeled by him and Dave told me he was a 93 year old former physician who had been convicted of prescribing pain killers as an act of mercy for desperate patients. Nobody was harmed but because he somehow broke the law, he will be spending his last days in jail.

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...98&oe=595BE7C8

Andrea Olson-Parker interview with the TV. Wind and traffic noise are bad making for difficult listening

http://youtu.be/p_k87h-u0sQ

https://youtu.be/p_k87h-u0sQ

John Lamb and Andrea Parker mid-day update 4/4/2017

http://youtu.be/Uw7LshsVHh4

https://youtu.be/Uw7LshsVHh4

More bureaucratic bull$h1t

New acting deputy director eased tensions with Nev. ranchers

Posted on April 1, 2017 by Doug Knowles

Scott Streater, E&E News reporterPublished: Friday, March 31, 2017

John Ruhs, who as director of the Bureau of Land Management’s Nevada state office drew widespread praise for helping defuse tensions between the agency and ranchers following the Cliven Bundy standoff three years ago, has been appointed BLM’s acting deputy director of operations.

Rhus will replace Jerry Perez, who at the end of next month will return to California to resume his duties as state director, Mike Nedd, BLM’s acting director, said in an email sent yesterday to members of the agency’s executive leadership team.https://i0.wp.com/itmattershowyousta...20%2C418&ssl=1
Ruhs will assume the acting deputy director position May 1, according to Nedd. Marci Todd, BLM Nevada’s associate state director, will take over for Ruhs, Nedd wrote.

The deputy director of operations is responsible for overseeing the day-to-day activities of managing the agency’s 10,000 employees and the nearly 250 million acres of public lands under its control.

Former BLM Director Bob Abbey has called the position the most important one at the agency (Greenwire, March 23, 2016).
Ruhs has been at BLM for nearly 30 years, serving in numerous positions, including as the director of BLM’s Eastern States Office and as BLM’s senior special assistant in Washington, D.C.

https://i2.wp.com/www.eenews.net/ima...size=170%2C226
John Ruhs. Photo courtesy of the Bureau of Land Management.

He made a name for himself within the agency as state director in Nevada. Sporting a forked mustache and wearing a cowboy hat, Ruhs got his boots on the ground early and often during his tenure in Nevada by visiting rural communities.

But his claim to fame involved brokering a truce in the summer of 2015 with ranchers who had openly defied BLM’s grazing restrictions and ridden horses from the Pacific Ocean to the U.S. Capitol to air grievances over the agency’s management.

A year earlier, armed ranchers had blocked BLM and law enforcement officials from removing hundreds of head of cattle owned by Bundy that were illegally grazing on federal lands. The 1,000 or so head of cattle from Bundy’s 160-acre ranch in Bunkerville, Nev., are apparently still roaming on federal land in and around the Gold Butte region, which former President Obama last year designated as a 300,000-acre national monument.

Bundy is facing federal felony charges in the 2014 standoff.

Ruhs, who was born to a farming family in Iowa and left home at age 17 to join the Marines, began his career at BLM in the late 1980s in Vale, Ore., as a seasonal “range rider” who monitored livestock use on remote federal lands, according to a 2015 E&E News profile (Greenwire, Sept. 21, 2015).

“I put a lot of miles on horses,” he said at the time.

He continued to do so in Nevada, where Ruhs said his personal meetings with ranchers helped earn their trust.
“I try to understand where they’re coming from,” he said in the profile. “You look through their eyes if you can.”

Nedd praised Ruhs in his email yesterday to staff.

“John’s experience as BLM-Nevada State Director and his reputation for proactive collaborative management make him an excellent candidate to fill this important role,” Nedd wrote.

Steve Ellis, who retired as deputy director of operations last year, agreed with Nedd, calling Ruhs a great choice for the position.

Ellis, who championed Ruhs as BLM Nevada director in 2015, said he “defused a lot of tension” between the agency and the ranching community following the Bundy fiasco.

“John’s done a great job in Nevada,” Ellis said.

Perez was appointed California state director in 2015, but he soon took leave to became acting deputy director of operations several months after Ellis retired.

“Since the transition in January, Jerry Perez has done a fantastic job serving as the Acting Deputy Director,” Nedd wrote. “He has helped steer our agency through a significant period of leadership change and I hope you will all join me in thanking him for his contributions during his time back east.”

Perez, who had previously served as director of BLM’s Oregon-Washington state office, will once again oversee 15.2 million acres of public lands in California, or nearly 15 percent of the state’s land mass.

“Please join me in thanking Jerry Perez for his service and in welcoming John Ruhs back to the Washington Office,” Nedd wrote.

Email: sstreater@eenews.netsource

Court Watchers for Constitution Originalists. https://www.facebook.com/groups/8500...ef=group_cover

Loren Pearce

20 hrs

SHOCKING DISPLAY OF INJUSTICE

You had to be there to believe it. This was my first time in Las Vegas court to observe what is happening. John Lamb, who has racked up a lot of court watching time in Oregon and Nevada, told me that this day was the worst that he had seen so far. In addition to what he says below, I will add my comments:

1. If there was any question that Navarro was biased or not, it became crystal clear that she was biased in favor of the feds. She opened court by lecturing us on not showing any emotion through our body language, no rolling eyes, no shaking head, etc Shortly after that, the judge shook her head in disapproval of a defense comment.

2. One of the witnesses for the prosecution, an FBI agent, sat at the prosecutor's table in clear violation of the court rule banning witnesses from being present. Margaret Houston, the woman body slammed by the BLM, was called by the defense to be a witness and had to remain outside of the courtroom. A double standard.

3. The prosecution objected to the defense witnesses as being irrelevant and the judge agreed. In fact, I don't recall the judge ever disagreeing with her prosecutor counterparts. Margaret Houston was denied by Navarro as a witness as well as several other defense witnesses.leaving the defense with very little to offer the jury in the way of witnesses.

4. The defense had motioned for a dismissal, and the judge, obviously had her mind made up prior to hearing arguments as she read all the reasons why she would deny the motion.

5. Probably the most disturbing part of the trial was for the prosecution to claim they have an ongoing investigation going on and that witnesses who were present at the Bunkerville protest, could be indicted/prosecuted if they gave testimony that incriminated them thereby intimidating the witnesses not to testify. Those who would testify were given court appointed counsel in case they wanted to plead the 5th.

6. Another highly disturbing development, was the denial by Navarro of the defense request to have Dan Love brought in as a witness. Dan Love was the key BLM player at the Nevada protest, who as superviosr, had organized the BLM activities and military response, yet Navarro said his testimony was not relevant.


https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...36&oe=5951DDC4

LikeCommentShare

​Loren Pearce There is a clear conflict of interest as she was nominated by Harry Reid, the arch enemy of the Bundys. She owes her position as not only federal judge, but chief justice because of him. This young woman was catapulted to a high position over other judges with decades more experience and tenure and she had ZERO experience. She owes him big time.

Like · 3 · 12 hrs



https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...a0&oe=595549C5


Loren Pearce

12 hrs

https://www.facebook.com/groups/8500...2009784571286/
Patricia Badish SPOT ON!
There is a clear conflict of interest as she was nominated by Harry Reid, the arch enemy of the Bundys. She owes her position as not only federal judge, but chief justice because of him. This young woman was catapulted to a high position over other judges with decades more experience and tenure and she had ZERO experience. She owes him big time.

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...91&oe=59558079

LikeCommentShare

Bundy Trial Eric Parker will take the stand against tyranny (article)

http://youtu.be/my5peAJBvPM

https://youtu.be/my5peAJBvPM

Bundy Trial - Eric Parker - Will take Stand against Tyranny (article)


Valley Forge Network 51 views

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-lo1d6vjbM_Q/A...ffff/photo.jpg
SUBSCRIBE

1,673
9
0
Published on Apr 4, 2017 Judge Openly LAUGHS At Defendants Rightshttp://redoubtnews.com/2017/04/03/jud...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nevada Bundy Trial Update #2 - No Witnesses Allowed for Defense - Monday - 04/03/17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcSRA...

HELP! Nevada Update - Bundy Women Make Plea to Americans to Help get Justice !!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEyLp...~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is the redoubt news article, I simply went over it as a means to get some news out about Eric.

This man is being railroaded to further the conspiracy charge against the Bundy's. He was simply protecting protestors (women and children) from armed government agents. (Who were openly taunting the protestors with rifles drawn) One of the other DEFENDANTS was outed as a government INFORMANT and now THEY WILL NOT LET ERIC CALL ANY WITNESSES!

He is now faced with possibly having to testify himself. Please pray for Eric and his wife and family, she has worked very hard to report for her husband.Please pray the truth will shine and the jurors will hear it...

• Category
  
  • Education
  
  
• License
  
  • Standard YouTube License

KrisAnne Hall sends greetings to Judge Gloria Navarro

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...3c&oe=59536886



KrisAnne Hall4 hrs

These charges against Judge Gloria Navarro are sickening. It is stunning that we could have a person whose position is of justice, yet is so ignorant of Liberty, so ignorant of the Constitution, so deep in the depths of servitude and slavery.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/kel-stewart/list-of-violations-in-judge-navarros-federal-court-room-las-vegas-nevada-cliven-/253956671674795

"Constitution only allowed to be in courtroom if turned around backwards in the observers pockets."

"Refusing to allow defense to call federal witnesses that prove bias in the federal government."

Navarro even violates her own precious god of precedent by denying the settled law of Plummer v State and John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.

This woman deserves no respect in the law, or in person. She is offensive to the Spirit of Liberty and offensive to all things that make our Constitutional Republic what it is. She has sold her soul to the hand that feeds her. The saddest thing of it all, her children and grandchildren will be the miserable sufferers of her ignorance.

After you read these charges, if you would like to discuss this with Judge Navarro and see what her defense is of these charges, you can contact her at:
Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro (702) 464-5490


Courtroom Administrator: Aaron Blazevich (702) 464-5421

My message to Ms. Navarro?

"Since you love wealth and Harry Reid better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your services. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ~ KrisAnne Hall

Bundy Ranch #LibertyFirst #LibertyMatters

Navarro pushes defense to rest its case

Judge Navarro Pushes Defense To Rest Case in Bunkerville Trial


NOT YET ABLE TO CALL A SINGLE WITNESS, JUDGE NAVARRO ASKED THE DEFENSE IF THEY WERE READY TO REST THEIR CASE TOMORROW.

April 4, 2017 BLM, FBI, Featured, Nevada 1

http://www.avantlink.com/gbi/11653/2...9211/image.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=641%2C425

Judge Navarro Pushes Defense To Rest Case in Bunkerville Trial

by Shari Dovale

It has been two days that the defense has been attempting to present their case to the jury in theBunkerville trial being held in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Out of these two days, the jury has been in the courtroom about 15 minutes, or so. The remaining time has been filled with frustrations from the defendants and laughter from the Judge and prosecutors.

Yes, Judge Gloria Navarro continued to laugh at the distress of the defendants every time she slapped more evidence out of their hands.

https://i1.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=150%2C150
Eric Parker
Eric Parker said yesterday that he would testify, as he felt he had no other options. Navarro and the prosecutors subjected him to another round of intimidation today in their attempts to make him change his mind. Navarro has already threatened him with “enhanced” perjury charges if she feels he has not told the truth.

And the truth is very subjective in her courtroom. She spent most of the morning going over jury instructions. She intends to instruct the jury that just carrying a holstered weapon can be a criminal act. She also does not intend to allow the jury to hear that there is a “Right To Carry” law in Nevada.

The defense asked for an instruction to be included about the missing witness, Dan Love. They have been attempting to introduce video evidence. This video includes Dan Love and Pete Santilli, yet neither one of them are allowed to testify, therefore, there is no one available to introduce this evidence. Navarro dismissed that motion and will not allow the instruction.

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=150%2C150
Todd Engel
The only bright spot today is that Navarro has finally agreed to allow Todd Engel to present his closing arguments. Engel is still not allowed to do anything else, including speak, in her courtroom, but he can represent himself in the closing.

I am happy that the defense was able to discuss the Facebook evidence. It has been stressed throughout the country and the government that Facebook posts and articles are not to be considered trusted sources. Yet, the prosecution has brought in over 500 posts, memes and more to show just how evil these defendants are. The prosecution has even gone so far as to suggest that using the phrase “Whatever it takes” is an implied threat.

https://i2.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=225%2C225

They have suggested very warped definitions of ‘threats to the government’. Navarro has made it clear from the very first day that she makes law in that courtroom, therefore, if she wants to distort the truth to the jury, then we must accept that.

The prosecution continues to stress their “ongoing criminal investigation” into UN-indicted Co-conspirators. They have suggested that they can prosecute people just for showing up to watch the protesters. They have even implied that if someone “Likes” a post on Facebook, that is evidence for conspiracy. Based on their definitions, just by reading this article you can be considered a conspirator. I guess I will continue to be on their list, as I will continue to write these articles and expose their corruption.

Navarro was not concerned with the defense arguments, yet it did get on the record. That made it worthwhile at least.

The defense also argued for “limited immunity” for select witnesses so they may testify to the events. The prosecution refused and the Judge agreed. They do not want the defense to have any witnesses, though the defense will likely present one or two witnesses.

After the prosecution had extended time, over five weeks, and the defense has yet to be allowed to call any witnesses, the Judge asked the defense if they were ready to rest their case tomorrow.

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• 148
  Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  148
• Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
• Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Judge Openly LAUGHS At Defendants Rights April 3, 2017In "BLM"

Shutting Down The Defense - UPDATES on Bunkerville Trial April 3, 2017In "BLM"

Shawna Cox: What America needs to know about the Bunkerville trial March 30, 2017In "BLM"

Navarro is getting raked over the coals on social media, but nobody in government has made a move to get her off this case



Navarro: Jury Cannot Use Constitution


JURY NULLIFICATION MUST BE PROHIBITED AND NO JURY INSTRUCTION SHOULD INCLUDE ANY MENTION OF THE 1ST AND 2ND AMENDMENT.

April 5, 2017 BLM, Constitution, DOJ, Nevada

http://www.avantlink.com/gbi/11653/2...9211/image.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/redoubtnews.com/wp...size=678%2C381

Navarro: Jury Cannot Use Constitution

By Loren Edward Pearce

IMAGINE A BASKETBALL REFEREE ASKING FOR GUIDANCE FROM THE COACH OF HER FAVORITE TEAM DURING A CONTEST

Court watch, Tuesday, April 4

That is what we have with Gloria Navarro in her interaction with the fed prosecutionteam. What we really have is a judge who is solidly in support of her team mates, the federal prosecutors.

At 10:11 am, on April 4 during arguments over jury instructions, Navarro looked at the prosecution team and said, “I am not sure what to do” then she said she would go back to the issue later. Repeatedly, throughout the hearing, the judge would look to the prosecutors for guidance and then would say, “I agree”.

The defense was repeatedly denied their motions and requests until the suggestion was made for a jury instruction to change the wording from “victim” to “alleged victim” so as to not give the jury the impression that the victim was a certain fact. Adding the word alleged created the impression that there was still doubt as to who was the victim.

Like throwing a bone with no meat to a dog, the judge reluctantly agreed to change the language to “alleged victim”. A short time later, the judge took the meatless bone away from the dog, and said, “I am reversing myself, I am not going to modify the language to alleged but will leave it as it is.” This tiny concession to the defense was too much for the judge and prosecution and it was taken back.

The defense repeatedly said that it was for the jury to determine if and when the 1st and 2nd amendment would apply in determining their relationship to the intent and actions of the defendants. The prosecution would have opportunity to show the jury why the defense argument was not correct and then let the jury decide.

Navarro said, and I am a witness, jury nullification must be prohibited and no jury instruction should include any mention of the 1st and 2nd amendment. She went on to say that bringing any mention of the 1st and 2nd amendment to the jury would not be helpful and would confuse them. Should there be any violations of the 1st and 2nd amendment or other constitutional questions, that it could be appealed and it was for the appellate court to decide, not the jury. Of course, that is an outrageous statement, starting with the fact that constitutional questions are for the jury to decide as facts may relate to it and appeals means long prison time for the defendants as they await an appellate decision.

One issue that jumped out at me was Navarro’s denial of a jury instruction that would show that Nevada is an open carry state and as such, many of the defendants thought it was perfectly legal to carry weapons while at the protest. The prosecution objected, and the judge agreed, that federal law trumps state law and as such, the Nevada open carry had no relevancy and the jury didn’t need to be confused by that.

Eric Parker asked to testify on his own behalf. When asked by the judge why he wanted to testify on his own behalf and if he understood the risks he was taking, Eric said, “I feel obligated to testify because the court has taken away our other witnesses, not allowing them to testify, so I am compelled to testify as one of the only remaining witnesses the court will allow”.

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, TO BRING THESE ATROCITIES TO THEIR ATTENTION. WHILE IT MAY SEEM LIKE SPITTING IN THE OCEAN, IF ENOUGH PEOPLE SPIT ENOUGH TIMES, IT WILL GET THEIR ATTENTION.

Longbow Productions may have muddied the waters

I-Team: FBI's undercover tactics raise questions

Copyright 2017 Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed

Free Range Report Harry Reids pet judge


Harry Reid’s pet judge violates civil rights of Bundy Ranch defendants

April 5, 2017 editor Leave a comment

Most of the prosecution’s witnesses (federal agents) were allowed to be in the court room before they took the stand, but potential witnesses for the defense have been restricted from hearing the trial before taking the stand. The prosecution witnesses have spoken of their fear, and were even allowed to cry on the stand, but the defense witnesses were told they could not do or say anything that would make the jury feel badly for them.

Commentary by Kel Stewart



A list of violations in Judge Navarro’s Federal Court Room: Las Vegas, Nevada, Cliven Bundy et al vs United States of America



Our Constitutional rights are not only being violated, they are being mocked and disposed of as if they are nothing more than a suggestion from our framers.
A court of order and Justice can only exist if all parties involved follow the Law, the supreme Law of the Land.

Following are just some of the violations that our fellow Americans now standing trial in Judge Gloria Navarro’s Federal Courtroom are suffering:

• First, the US Constitution, the very document our founders fought and died for to protect the people from an overreaching government, has been denied to be visible in the court room. The only way it’s being allowed in the federal courtroom, is if it’s turned around backwards in the observers’ pockets. This should break the hearts of any proud American who looks to our Constitution and flag as a symbol of Justice and Liberty for all.
• Defendant, Todd Engel, has been denied his constitutionally-protected right to represent himself because he dared to ask an FBI agent on the stand if the head BLM agent, Dan Love, was in fact under investigation for misconduct. That question alone, caused the judge to strip him of his right to self represent. And even though the defense has every constitutionally-protected right to call Agent Dan Love to the stand, the judge is denying that right, stating his testimony is not necessary to their defense.
• We have a constitutionally-protected right to face our accusers. however, FBI Agent Adam Nixon, took the stand and testified that he had obtained a warrant to search Greg Burleson’s Facebook page, and he went through the information presented, and NEVER mentioned he was also Burleson’s appointed handler in 2013. Greg was the only ‘defendant’ (informant) who had spoken a message of violence which was NOT in line with our families’ messages and in fact shocked us all when the videos were revealed in court. Had we heard those words from him while we were protecting our property and cattle, he would have been immediately removed from our land.
• It was not revealed that Burleson was an FBI informant until the following week when another agent, Michael Caputo, took the stand and Burleson’s own attorney came out and questioned him about Burleson’s time as an informant. Burleson’s last phone call to Agent Caputo was right after he was interviewed later in 2015 by the FBI’s fake documentary company, Longbow Productions.
• Along with all this, no other defense attorneys were not allowed to cross-examine Agent Caputo in order to get more information about Burleson’s payments from the FBI or time as an informant. To top it off, news Channel 8 came and reported on Burleson’s damming and violent videos, and failed to report to the public that he was in fact an FBI informant. They failed to report on the other two defendants’ peaceable interviews with the fake FBI news crew (Longbow), and only focused on Burleson’s very violent videos, under the pretense that he was one of us. This biased reporting has tained the jury pool for the next 2 trials coming this year for the rest of the defendants.
• We have a constitutionally-protected right to call witnesses to the stand in our defense. Nowhere in the Constitution does it regulate how many or what kind of witnesses can be called. Yet the defense was denied nearly every witness it attempted to call as it attempted to make its case. On the first day set for defense to call its witnesses, not one was allowed to take the stand. In the end, those willing to testify for the defense are being threatened with arrest because prosecutors are calling this an ongoing conspiracy, indicating they can indict more people at any time.
• During the 7 weeks since the prosecution took the stand, the defense was not able to start their day with even one approved witness.
• Family members who were eye witnesses, including the wives of some of the defendants, were prevented from testifying for the defense for being ‘unprofessional or lay or political’ witnesses.
• They are not allowed to discuss the fact that cows were shot by federal agents, which was the main motivation people came to the aid of the Bundy family in the first place.
• They cannot discuss Ammon Bundy being tazed, Dave Bundy being arrested on the road for simply recording the activities, or Margaret Houston being thrown to the ground.
• They cannot discuss how afraid they were of the agents, or anything that would ‘pull on the hearts strings of the jury.’
• They cannot discuss anything political or religious nor can they bring up anything that can risk Jury Nullification (words from the judge).
• At one point, the judge was actually objecting FOR the defense and telling them they could not even state why they were objecting because it was disrupting the court, they could only motion their hand to show agreement they wanted to object. Then she would wait until the prosecution was done before making a ruling. She said the jury was educated enough to know to dismiss the information if she sustained the defenses objections. This is NOT how an objection works! This jury has been completed tainted.
• At this point, even though the defendants have a constitutionally-protected right to not take the stand and testify in their own case, Eric Parker had agree to testify because if he does not, there may not be anyone to speak on behalf of the defense.
• Most of the prosecution’s witnesses (federal agents) were allowed to be in the court room before they took the stand, but potential witnesses for the defense have been restricted from hearing the trial before taking the stand. The prosecution witnesses have spoken of their fear, and were even allowed to cry on the stand, but the defense witnesses were told they could not do or say anything that would make the jury feel badly for them.
• The prosecution had the stand for 6-7 weeks but the defense can not even start on day 1 with out being shut down, and is being told they will rest within 5 days.
• The prosecution presented ‘evidence’ from before 4/12/14 but the defense can not.
• The prosecution presented witnesses that were not even present at Bunkerville but the defense is being told even eye witnesses are not qualified to testify because they are ‘lay witnesses’.
• The judge has prohibited defendants from discussing United States Constitutional Amendments or the Nevada Constitution which are relevant the ‘right to carry,’ because, according to Navarro, it could cause them to consider jury nullification.

America, this should shock your conscience. This is not the America we have come to love and cherish. If God does not intervene, and the people do not speak up, justice will not prevail.

~Concerned but still hopeful American

***********

Kel Stewart is a friend to Angie and Lisa Bundy and was a Bundy family representative for the first Oregon trials in which Ammon and Ryan Bundy were defendants. Kel lives near Portland, Oregon, and made weekly jail visits, and also coordinated peaceful rallies in support of the defendants in the first and second Oregon trials.

http://www.sltrib.com/csp/mediapool/...YPE=image/jpegSalt Lake Tribune photo

Free Range Report

The defense was able to call their first witness ths morning. 4/5/17

John Lamb and Andrea Olson-Parker

http://youtu.be/dqjmS9A9gx4

https://youtu.be/dqjmS9A9gx4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

JURY NULLIFICATION MUST BE PROHIBITED AND NO JURY INSTRUCTION SHOULD INCLUDE ANY MENTION OF THE 1ST AND 2ND AMENDMENT.

---

Is everyone really this clueless? This has been the norm in Federal star chambers aka "courts" for decades. You don't go to court to get justice; you go to court to do business. And the policies are all stacked mightily against you. Appeals to the Constitution: not allowed. Appeals to reason: not allowed. Calling meaningful or effectively examining witnesses: not allowed. David Lane explained all this years ago.

Like I said in another thread, you have three options when dealing with the regime:

1) avoid it;
2) submit to it;
3) attack it.

1 is not always possible.

3 is a "play for keeps" enterprise. And I'm talking deadly force, not some faggy "redemption" or "free man on the land" shysterism.

Unfortunately, the Bundys, Finnicum, and their allies all made the mistake of thinking there was a fourth option, "use 'the law' to enforce one's 'rights'."

Sadly, "the law" is the barrel of a gun. Either wielded by them...or you. Meaning the illusory option 4 is actually option 3.

I must also point out: where is Jeff Sessions or even Trump on this?

Sessions just reversed a bunch of Obama "civil rights" actions. Apparently he agrees with this persecution? "He's not aware" is not a tenable position.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by crimethink

I must also point out: where is Jeff Sessions or even Trump on this?

Sessions just reversed a bunch of Obama "civil rights" actions. Apparently he agrees with this persecution? "He's not aware" is not a tenable position.

---

Reading articles that reflect the position of Trump and his Secretary of the Interior on public land, I suspect they believe the ranchers should be prersecuted.
I haven't seen any statements from Sessions to get a clue about his beliefs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monty

Reading articles that reflect the position of Trump and his Secretary of the Interior on public land, I suspect they believe the ranchers should be prersecuted.

---

I believe that, as well. Trump is a "law and order" kind of fanatic. The Interior Commissar Zinke is likewise a "der law ist der law" fanatic. And, I think we know Sessions is exactly the same based on his other positions, like anti-constitutional "civil asset forfeiture."

End of Day 4/5/17 Bundy Ranch Trial

John Lamb and Andrea Parker with SSG. Moe,

http://youtu.be/qmJLrs_L5bY

https://youtu.be/qmJLrs_L5bY

From Sharon Rondeau's Post and Email. This is one of the better pieces I have seen written about the Bundy Affair

Is This Judge Fixing the Outcome of Cliven Bundy’s Trial?

By Sharon Rondeau on Wednesday, April 5, 20173 Comments




If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

DENIES DEFENSE WITNESSES AN OPPORTUNITY TO TESTIFY

by Sharon Rondeau

http://plxqmjeom0e7pd4c-zippykid.net...ro-450x313.jpg
http://www.nvd.uscourts.gov/bio/gloriamnavarro.aspx
(
Apr. 5, 2017) — U.S. District Court Judge Gloria Navarro is presiding over the trial of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and five other defendants stemming from a confrontation with agents from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

Exactly three years ago, federal agents began seizing and impounding Bundy’s cattle resulting from a dispute which began in 1993 over grazing fees. Supporters from all across the country traveled to the ranch, many of whom carried personal firearms.

Bundy's son Dave was arrested as a result of the standoff and held briefly, then released.

A full-fledged confrontation was avoided when BLM agents retreated following a number of initial clashes with protesters.

Bundy and 18 others were eventually charged by the federal government on 16 counts,including “conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States” and obstruction of justice. Bundy was not arrested directly after the standoff at his ranch on April 12, 2014, but rather, was taken into custody after debarking from a flight to Portland, OR after two of his sons were involved in the Malheur Wildlife Refuge occupation and arrested.

In February of last year, Cliven Bundy; his sons Ammon and Ryan; radio host Pete Santilli, who provided live coverage of the Bundy Ranch confrontation as it unfolded; and Ryan Payne of Montana were indicted by a federal grand jury on the aforementioned 16 charges.

http://plxqmjeom0e7pd4c-zippykid.net...-Supporter.jpg

Like Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III; Darren Wesley Huff; and many others, the Obama regime labeled the Bundys “domestic terrorists.”

After his arrest in Oregon, Cliven Bundy was placed in the Multnomah, OR County Jail, then in solitary confinement in a federal prison, where he has remained through the present day.

Then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had recommended Navarro to Obama for the federal judgeship. A former chief deputy district attorney in Clark County, NV, Navarro was confirmed by the Senate in May 2010, an announcement Reid posted on his Senate website at the time.

Prior to her confirmation hearings, Reid had told the Senate Judiciary Committee that Navarro “is devoted to justice and the rule of law.”However, the Las Vegas Sun reported of her candidacy:
Reid’s glowing testimony came despite the fact that Navarro is one of the lowest rated of the federal judicial nominations made by Obama since March. A substantial majority of the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, meaning 10 to 13 of its 15 members, rated her as qualified whereas a minority determined her to be not qualified. Only one other nominee among the 45 made by Obama since he took office was determined to be not qualified by at least some members of the committee.

Last year, Bundy’s lead defense attorney sued Navarro for allegedly taking part in a “conspiracy,” along with former Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) and Barack Hussein Obama aimed at “stealing his property,” maintaining Bundy in solitary confinement, violating his constitutional rights, and denying him an impartial trial.

On May 11, 2016, Fox News reported that “Federal prosecutor Steven Myhre dismissed as ‘outrageous, irrelevant and offensive’ the idea that there was “some grand conspiracy by political leaders to take over the land.”

On April 7, 2016, Breitbart reported that “Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid is reportedly hoping the federal government—specifically President Barack Obama’s administration—will grab a stretch of land in Southern Nevada near the infamous Bundy Ranch, now that many in the Bundy group are in federal custody,” citing a “Nevada political observer.”

On December 28, 2016, Obama declared a large area in southeastern Nevada a national monument, said to include “the site of the infamous Bundy Ranch standoff as well as land very close to the Bundy Ranch itself.”

The Bundys’ response to the designation, posted on their blog, reads:
We, the Bundy Family, would like to say to President Obama that we are saddened, but not surprised, by the your decision to make our ranch and home a national monument. If any of this were really about protecting the land, you would come here, work with the local people who love this land, those who have a vested interest in this land, and take the time to learn what this land really needs. This is about control, pure and simple. You don’t love this land, you have never visited here, but you love being in control of this land. The problems we have had with federal land management have never been about cows, tortoises, or fees. It has always been about the constitutional limits on the federal government’s authority. While you enjoy a vacation in Hawaii we are here caring for this land and resisting federal overreach. Shame on you for undoing with your pen the good work we have done with our sweat for generations. We call on Attorney General Adam Laxalt to fight this to the fullest extent of the law!

There has been speculation that Trump might take the step of rescinding national-monument designations, but no announcement has been made to date.

Bundy had wanted Atty. Larry Klayman, founder of FreedomWatch, to represent him, but Navarro denied his request. Klayman wrote shortly thereafter that Navarro’s reasons for denying his application to practice pro hac vice on Bundy’s behalf were invalid.

Just days ago, the Las Vegas Sun reported that Bundy’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the issue was denied by a three-judge panel in a 2-1 vote. The panel’s opinion states that the judges “do not understand” one of Klayman’s requests and that “there are no merits” to Bundy’s request for a writ of mandamus.

Despite his having been prohibited from representing Bundy, Klayman publicized a legal defense fund on his behalf.

On Monday, the AP reported that Navarro disallowed the majority of defense witnesses from testifying after reportedly allowing the prosecution to call “more than three dozen” of its own witnesses. An attorney for one of the defendants said that the ruling has “crippled the defense and ensured the jury won’t hear from most of the witnesses that defendants’ attorneys intended to call.”

On Wednesday evening, constitutional educator, attorney and author KrisAnne Hall called upon the congressional Freedom Caucus to impeach Navarro.http://plxqmjeom0e7pd4c-zippykid.net...nt-450x113.jpg

Having begun in February, the Bundy trial is now expected to conclude in the near future, perhaps by the end of the week, according to media reports.

A video account of some of the proceedings dated March 23 is here.

On March 25, NewsTarget reported that “The Bundy Ranch trials are underway, having begun in February of this year. There have already been reports that federal court Judge Gloria Navarro, who is presiding over the case, has dealt several blows to the defense teams throughout the trial. She has allegedly given the prosecution favorable treatment regarding time expansion, granting them over five weeks to present their case. She has, however, refused to do the same for the defense, allowing the six defendants only one week to present their case.”

That allegation was confirmed on Monday.

This Is mostly a repost of Free Range Report's list of Kelli StewarT's allegations with a bit of added commentary

FEDERAL JUDGE GLORIA NAVARRO HAS APPOINTED HERSELF RULING QUEEN OF HER LAS VEGAS TERRITORY


https://i1.wp.com/www.1776again.com/...size=570%2C450


Edit:
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...cd&oe=59974C4A

Teresa Brookshire shared a link.

1 hr
"Several attorneys and academics who examined Navarro’s resume speculated that her lack of experience as a judge may have been the reason some ABA reviewers rated her “not qualified” for the federal bench.
Reid told the Judiciary Committee it was “upsetting to me” that Navarro “is not rated as high as she should be rated.”
Well, certainly looks like the naysayers were right.

https://external.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...DwcrlO_DdQ3KNs

Reid criticizes lawyers group
WASHINGTON — Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., criticized the American Bar Association on Thursday, saying it should “get a new life” in how it rates prospective federal judges, after one …
REVIEWJOURNAL.COM
LikeCommentShare

Patti Tice Roberts, Peggy Williamson, Constance Owen and 6 others like this.
4 shares
Comments

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...3e&oe=595B0CA7

Maria D' Angeles Thank you Teresa for all you do.
Sharing.
Like · 2 · 1 hr


https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...3e&oe=595BE117

John Miller Why does Harry Reid care so much about Ms. Navarro...?
Like · 58 mins

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...58&oe=595DCA62

Trena Heaton Schuster What did harry get?
Like · 1 · 56 mins

https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...5c&oe=595ABFD2

Constance Owen Dear MRS. Brookshire,
I tried to write a comment on the House Judiciary Committee Facebook page and also on their website, but couldn't see any where to write a comment. So I put the comment on the public stream. How do we get a message to the House and Senate Judiciary committees? Thank you if you have the time to help maybe a blind or foolish fellow patriot.
Like · 2 · 39 mins

J Grady say KBOI in Idaho reported fair on the Nevada trial

http://youtu.be/vPlckfKyf-0

https://youtu.be/vPlckfKyf-0

The judge allowed the defence to submit evidence today against the persecuters objections. Eric Parker is testifying.
John Lamb with a short update

http://youtu.be/GnEhme-X0-w

https://youtu.be/GnEhme-X0-w

John Lamb and Andrea Olson-Parker with the end of day and end of week Bundy trial report. 4/6/17

http://youtu.be/mjq2j3qp75w

https://youtu.be/mjq2j3qp75w

FBI Informers, the Bundys, and Watering Horses
Posted on April 7, 2017 by David Robinson
12405-judge2banna Judge Anna von Reitz

Ask yourself this question: if there are any “FBI Informants” operating in the take-down of the Colorado Grand Juries and State Justices— where are they?

Chances are they are in jail with the rest of the folks, so that they can continue to spy on and manipulate them from a position of trust.

They are certainly not standing here as I have been for yea, so many weeks, giving warning and instruction to people so that they might correct their ways and avoid arrest.

I hear that my name and that of Bella Haywood have been taken in vain and certain parties who are in fact to blame for this debacle have been accusing us of being traitors and informers and so on.

The plain fact is that if these people had followed our advice or even just paid attention to the Public Law they wouldn’t be arrested. There would be no big controversy.

I’ve also been getting a lot of mail about the Bundys. Save the Bundys! Save the Bundys!

The Bundys have had the benefit of my advice and the facts since Day One of their arrest. I explained it to them and I will explain it to all of you again.

United States Citizens and “citizens of the United States” have no constitutional rights. At most, they have “equal civil rights”– but those rights are at the discretion of the Congress and the courts. This is why that federal judge felt that she could afford to laugh in their faces and threaten them with contempt of court for mentioning The Constitution.

They are being tried under false presumptions in a court that is totally foreign to them. They are being tried as “US citizens” and with the possible exception of Ryan Bundy, they have done absolutely nothing to rebut that presumption.

They could get an authenticated copy of their Birth Certificate, accept it as “Drawee” on the front of the document and then endorse it over on the back to the United States of America, U.S. Treasury Without Recourse— and make Steven T. Mnuchin the Fiduciary responsible for AMMON BUNDY, for example.

That would very neatly separate them from the PERSON that is on trial.

They could also post a very hefty Private Registered Indemnity Bond with the Treasury and use that to insure (indemnify) themselves against any charges brought against AMMON BUNDY—- which is just a ledger ACCOUNT that the rats in Nevada are bent on pillaging.

They could ask to see the Bid and Performance Bond related to their case. If they did this in open court the clerk would poop green goo, but have no choice but to produce the incriminating evidence.

They could then accept those Bid and Performance Bonds for Value, charge them off against their Indemnity Bond, and return it to the same laughing Judge and make her laugh out of the other side of her ugly face.

And if no Bid and Performance Bonds were forthcoming, the Prosecutor would have to pay for the whole proceedings out of his pocket and the Judge would have to dismiss.

There have to be two dozen things that they could do to walk out of that court as free men, but no, they won’t listen.

Just like Bruce Doucette wouldn’t listen. And Michael R. Hamilton won’t listen. And Randy Drew wouldn’t listen. And Terry Trussell wouldn’t listen. And Tim Turner wouldn’t listen. And so many, many, many others.

They all insist on calling themselves some kind of United States citizens. They all insist on answering to names. They all insist that they have constitutional rights when United States citizens have never had constitutional rights in over two hundred years…. They all have to try to snow the court under with fancy common law documents that don’t apply and reams of case law that don’t apply.

They just can’t connect to the fact that they are being dragged through a commercial court in international jurisdiction.

And when I try to tell them this, they pause, stare blankly at me, and then go right on with whatever they were doing anyway. It’s like the information hits a “bumper” in their brain and they just reject it like a pinball being tossed aside.

So, please, everyone, this is what I have had to deal with. It isn’t that I haven’t tried or failed my duty to share information or anything else. I have talked and shared until I am blue in the face—- to no avail.

You can lead a horse to water, but….. if the “horse” wants to go to jail, then at a certain point, you just step aside and let him.

Bid Bonds, Performance Bonds CUSIP. Gene Keating

https://www.facebook.com/notes/ginit...ng/53838263849

Criminal Court Bonding

February 23, 2009 at 10:08pm
Criminal Court Bonding

Gene Keating workshop

Statutes are bonds. Courtroom charges are civil, not criminal. Clerk’s Praxis was the court of arches under the king’s bench at the time of Edward I. It’s a court of probates. John Hall wrote this book. This was used in vice-admiralty courts in the colonies in the American Revolution and this is what caused the revolution.

Everything involves bonds. When you are arrested there are two different sets of bond. A bid bond is filled out when you are arrested. US District court uses forms used SF 273, 274, and 275. There is another set of bonds. Both sets are put out by the GSA. SF form 24 is the bid bond. The performance bond is SF form 25. The payment bond is SF form 25 A. These are all put out by the GSA, under the Comptroller of the Currency under the GAO (general accounting office).

SF 273, 274 and 275 are the bonds for federal level courts to use. What are they doing with these bonds? In the court room you are being sued for debt collection. It is an action in assumpsit. The word, presume, comes from assumpsit. “I agree, or I undertook to do...” Assumpsit means collection of debt.

All these bonds have a penal sum attached to it. If you go into default judgement, you end up in prison wondering what is going on. If you argue jurisdiction, or refuse to answer questions that the court addresses to you, you’ll be in contempt of court and in jail. This goes back to Edward I and Clerk’s Praxis. This is all civil and not criminal. It’s a smoke screen to cover up what they are doing.

They brought someone to court under an arrest bond. There was a civil suit. Clerk’s Praxis is Latin for practice. Praxis means practice. This book is an actual practice book that goes into everything Jack Smith teaches, letter rogatories. You are held until the suit is complete, they get a default judgment for failure to pay a debt and then you are put in prison. Attorneys are there as a smoke screen to cover up what is really done. They lead you into default judgment by argument (dishonor), you go to prison and then the default judgment is sold.

US District Court buys all the state court judgments. Type US Court in any search engine. After you get to US Courts there are 11 circuit courts of the US listed. Click on circuit 7 and that takes you into all the list of courts. To find Ohio/Illinois find circuit 7 is northern Illinois district courts, bankruptcy courts, etc and then you’ll find a box that says clerks office. Scroll down and you’ll see administrative offices and under that you’ll see financial departments. It talks about the criminal justice acts, optional bids, it’s all spelled out.

Go to List of sureties. Why would they have a list of sureties in a federal district court? When you click on this it takes you to www.FMS.Treas.Gov. This is department of treasury. Then you will see on the left hand side of the screen, admitted and reinsured. Under that is list of sureties. Under that is ‘forms.’ If you click on admitted, reinsureds, there are over 300 insurance companies. There’s a complete list. There’s also a list of Surety Companies. These are more insurance companies. Under Circular 750 the dept of treasury these insurance company have to be certified before they can purchase the bonds. They can’t put up bonds unless they are certified by the secretary of the treasury.

Next you go to “forms.” Click here it goes to the Miller Backed Reinsurance; it’ll list three different type of bonds. You don’t use a bid bond in district court. These bonds come out of the GSA. The 273, 274 and 275 bond forms are as follows: 273 is the reinsurance agreement with the US; 274 is the Miller Act Reinsurance Performance Bond; 275 is your payment bond–the Miller Act Reinsurance Payment Bond.

What are they doing with these bonds? They have regulations governing these bonds.......2,000 pages governing these bonds. Gene will sell these for $50. If you go into these regulations they tell you they’re buying up commercial items (actual words) 2.01 of these regulations. These regulations are divided into 50 parts. There are 1126 pages Volume1; 823 pages in volume 2. Commercial items are nonpersonal property. Property that is not real estate, moveable property. Real estate is not moveable. These terms are defined in UCC.

Commercial items are commercial paper. This is the 8th edition of Black’s Law which just came out. “Commercial items: it’s commercial paper; negotiable instruments; anything you put your signature on is a negotiable instrument – lex mercantoria.(?) This is used in the courtroom because everyone of us is a merchant of law. Because I use commercial paper on a day-to-day schedule I am considered an expert. This is why they don’t tell us what’s going on in the court room. Every time we put our signature on a paper, we’re creating negotiable and non negotiable instruments and that makes us experts. When I endorse it under 3-419 I’m an accommodation party or an accommodation maker. Anyone who loans his signature to another party is an accommodation party. This is in 3-419 of the UCC.

When you loan your signature to them, they can rewrite your signature on any document they want to. The federal courts buy up the state courts default judgments. These are civil and just being called criminal to cover up what they are doing. If you don’t pay the debt you go to prison.

CUSIP is an identification system. DTC Depository Trust Corporation, and has several other monikers. Depository Trust Clearing Corporation. 1 trillion dollars a day goes through the DTC. Govt Clearing Securities Clearing Corporation is another day. CUSIP (committee on uniform identification processes) is a trademark of Standard and Poors and is on bottom floor of the building at Water Street in Washington DC. CUSIP cins (cusip international numbering system) is an international numbering system. Domestic securities have 6 digit numbers; international number (isid -- international securities identification division--plus) are a global networking system. Paine Webber, with 10,000 corporations in it, is the major stockholder of CCA, Corrections Corporation of America in Nashville, TN.

They have privatized the system. Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae, HUD, are all international. Everyone is feeding off the prison system internationally. All major corporations are feeding off the prison system including REIT (Real Estate Investment Trust), PZN–Prison Trust. All real estate companies are holding bonds and the bonds are not redeemed and they haven’t closed my account. Lehman Bros just gave $6 billion. New York City had a $3 billion deficit. Lehman Brothers gave NYC the money to build credit facility (not prison system). Lehman Brothers is underwriting the prison system. They buy up the bid bonds, the court judgments.

There are international treaties that are reinsurance treaties. Insurance Companies come in and act as sureties for the bid bonds. The performance, bid, and payment bonds are all surety bonds. All bid bonds must have a surety. The surety is guaranteeing the reinsuring of the bid bond by issuing the performance bond. They get an underwriter (investment broker or banker) to underwrite the performance bond which reinsures the bid bond. The underwriter takes the payment, performance and bid bonds and pools them into ‘mortgage backed securities’ which are called bonds and sold to TBA, The Bond Market Association, an actual corporation. After the payment bond is issued to reinsure or underwrite the performance bond, which reinsures the bid bond, the banks convert the bonds to investment securities. The banks and brokerage houses are selling these as investment securities. The prisoners are funding the whole enchilada. Because you got into default judgment when you went into the court room.

There are regulations governing these that are all in 48CFR, title 48 code of federal regulations. This is where Gene gets all the information. It’s on his $50 disc. Part 12 deals with commercial items, which are negotiable instruments, which are court judgments--the performance, payment and bid bonds. . Any time you deal in bonds you are dealing with risk management. A reinsurer and reinsurance means you are dealing in risk management. The reinsurer is assuming part of the risk of the bid bond; they give him a portion of the original premium. The original insurer gets part of the premium of the policy of the bid bond for acting as surety for the bid bond. The underwriter guarantees the resale of the bonds back to the public as investment securities.

To win in court you have to redeem the bond. Gene went to court and asked for his bid bond. He asked for post settlement closure of the account. This process is hypothecation. You have to know how to hypothecate the bond. Banks make derivatives out of your promissory notes and sell them (mortgages, credit cards etc). These prison bonds are being monetized. They make an investment security out of it. They make a fortune off the prisoners. These bonds go international into sinds and then into ANNA (annual numerical numbering association) in Brussels, Belgium with unlimited capital. This is where euro, yin, sterling, everything is under the prison system. All countries are feeding off it.

This is what was behind 911. State legislatures pass bond statutes so they can arrest people for paper terrorism. American Legislative Exchange Committee is behind all this. Paul Warrick owns this think tank. ALEC promotes privatization of the prison system. They go to the National Congress of Commissioners which are 72 judges and lawyers who ‘grew up’ under the UCC under lex mercantoria. “The principles of the law merchant are the rules of the decisions of all the courts.” Everything is commercial. All crimes are commercial. All crimes....kidnaping, robbery, extortion, murder. You don’t close the account, you go to prison. The bond gets sold domestically and internationally.

The bonds are sold on the NYSE. CCA (Corrections Corp of America) sells their stock and shares on the NYSE. John D. Russell owns 64 million shares of CCA. John Ferguson, VP, owns 5 million shares. They are on the CCA board of directors. The Dillon Corrections Corp is owned by David Dillon and merged with Trinity Ventures Investment who then became SB Warburg. That’s part of the Warburg family, located in Chicago, Illinois. They are hooked up with the BIF bank, the bank of international settlements in Switzerland, one of the largest banks in the world. This is why people do not win in court. Trial and pre sentencing are just a dog and pony show.

Don’t use a bond, Gene says. Use a bid bond. It has the word principle....I am the principal, the strawman is the surety. Put the strawman as the surety and myself as the principal. Then I fill out a performance bond which is a reinsurance bond for the bid bond. On the reinsurance bond I will put myself down as the guarantor or the reinsurer. The performance bond is 274. The payment bond underwrites the performance. I can underwrite the bid bond with the performance bond. That’s the reinsurer. The courts do this for me, because I don’t know this stuff. And then they make the money off me.

If you have a case pending, go into whatever district you are in. Find the court, type in the case number and it’ll tell me who has my bond. Banks are all tied into this. Every time I sign a check, it’s a promissory note, the bank makes a derivative out of it. The bank endorses it on the back, without recourse, and monetizes it by selling it as a derivative. They sell it internationally. My $100 check is used by 20 or 30 corporations internationally. This is why we are not getting back our canceled checks. The reason is they are sold as promissory notes. The banks make derivatives out of them and sell them internationally. Therefore, I am loaning money to the bank. The bank re-loans it to other people. The CUSIP # is a 9 digit number. Internationally it’s up into 12 digits, representing trillions of dollars.

What if you have a court case in default? Default is synonymous with dishonor. They are suing you civilly for collection of a debt. If you go into default judgment, if you have a claim, there mandatory rule 13. Rule 13 says that when a claim arises from the same transaction or occurrence it is mandatory that you file a counter claim. What is your counter claim? Post settlement and closure

of the account under public policy. You’re entitled to a discharge of the debt because you are the principle and the holder in due course of the original account; you own both sides of the account. You own the common stock and the preferred stock and you are the principal on the account which means you are the creditor. Everyone is acting like a debtor instead of a creditor. A creditor pays his debts.

You have to do the proper filing to establish your position. (UCC I–you have to be the secured party). You are the principal upon which all money circulates. This is the accrual method of accounting. Accruals are capital and interest from the principal. Any time you monetize debt you have a principal. You have to identify yourself as the principal. What they have to do is return all the capital and interest to you as the principal. This is the accrual method of accounting. When you go to court and argue jurisdiction what you are saying is you aren’t going to pay the debt. The strawman (all caps name) is the name they have a claim against because your mother signed the birth certificate with the state creating the strawman contract. They used your name in all capital letters. That makes you the fiduciary trustee of the account which means you pay all of your debts to honor the court. People in the redemption process are going into the court and arguing and getting into default judgment. If you don’t give your name or argue jurisdiction you’re causing problems. What you can do is give a conditional acceptance.

If they don’t charge you, they don’t have a claim against the strawman. But don’t start arguing with the court about it. Do a conditional acceptance. “I’ll be happy to give me my name, if you’ll give me the charging paper.” Rebut the presumption that they have charges against you. They work on presumption and they don’t have to have anything. You have to rebut the presumption. Use a negative averment. The court is drafting you for performance. If you don’t perform you get into dishonor by non-acceptance. They make a formal presentment under 3-501 of the UCC in order to charge and they use the word charge. They use the same commercial term on your indictments, complaints, your information. They use the word charge. The following charges...........two counts of RICO, etc. Gene Keating and Roger Elvick both had the same charges. Roger has been in jail 9 months, Roger hasn’t been to trial yet. Gene is out of jail. Roger is arguing jurisdiction. He’s arguing whether they are an article III court.

The have a business credit report on you. If the judge says he’s going to do a psychiatric exam on you, you’re arguing. You have to be a gentleman and not get belligerent. Be gentle as a dove and wise as a serpent. If you act like a belligerent they’re going to beat you up. You’re the fiduciary trustee and the principal and owner of the account.

Following is Gene’s overlay (notes in ( ) not to be included in the overlay–just emphasis). Tell them what to do. You want full settlement and closure of the account. You have to do this from the get-go. “I accept your charges for value and consideration (you must use value and consideration) in return for post-settlement and closure of account xxxxxxxxx (social security number with no dashes–the cusip is the SS # without the dashes) cusip and autotris (automated tracking identification system) number. Cusip is uniform security identification processes. Cusip uses you SS# to identify you because the birth certificate is an investment security. All these are registered at state level with department of human resources, then to department of commerce at federal level, and the to the DTC (Depository Trust Corporation on Water Street. CUSIP is a trademark of Standard and Poor. It is located under the DTC building at 55 Water Street in New York City. The 9 digit cusip is also used for isid (international numbering system).

“I accept the charges for value and consideration. In return please use my exemption and principal for post-settlement and closure of case number #___________ and cusip and autotris account #555555555 as this account is prepaid and exempt from levy.” Then date it and place your signature it below the previous statement. (The case # references back to your SS#. That’s why they always get your SS#). Endorse as the strawman by ‘authorized by’ or agent with your signature. Write “good as aval” after the signature. I’m the fiduciary trustee who is assuming responsibility for the strawman as the authorized representative. When you put the word by, and then authorized representative it means someone other than the strawman signed. Other way to do it is the real Christian appellation and you don’t have to put ‘by.’ (John Peter; Public) Under 3-402 1a of UCC, “if a person acting as a representative or purporting to act as a representative signs an instrument the name of the signor the representative person is bound by the signature in the same extent a representative person would be bound by the signature on a simple contract.” That is, you’re not incurring any liability on the signature. (Lynn’s note: look this up, the tape was hard to hear at this point) That’s why you want to sign the strawman name and then by John Peter Public, authorized representative.

What they do is they put the autotris # in a manual in a module; every federal and state agency has my tracking number. They have it in the criminal task force. Passports, metro police, city, county, sheriff, FEMA, homeland security all use this #. Autotris was made in a forensics laboratory in Russia. It is owned by AD&M.(stopped between the two left arrows).

He used this on an ADA and it worked. They held him for 3 days and let him go. Judges and attorneys do not understand commercial law. They don’t teach it in law school. No one uses it in a court room. Nobody knows this stuff and that’s why Gene is teaching it. Because we are using commercial paper, the law assumes we understand what we are doing. You are responsible for your actions. If you use commercial paper on a daily basis, that makes you an expert by legal definition. They presume you know all this stuff when you go into a courtroom. The judges don’t even know this stuff.

If you don’t show up in court with an attorney, they grill you about competency and mental capacity. Here’s what you are dealing with. You are arguing with these people. You don’t want to argue in a commercial setting. What you want to do and the reason you have to have an attorney in a court room is that they are working on the public side and you are working on the private side. Everyone on the public side is insolvent or bankrupt. You are dealing in (Black’s Law) a fiction of law: You are referred to legal fiction. Why do they call it legal fiction? Definition: (this is the reason why you can’t argue venue and jurisdiction in a commercial setting) assumption that something is true even though it may be untrue. (In some aspects of admiralty you can argue venue and jurisdiction.) Made especially in judicial reasoning to alter how a legal rule operates, specifically a device by which a legal rule or institution is divergent from its original purpose to accomplish indirectly some other object. The constructive trust is an example of a legal fiction. Also termed a fiction of law........fictio juris. They will not allow you to defeat this fiction of law. This came out of Erie vs. Thompkins and courts at all levels are using fictions of law because everything is colorable and has the appearance of being rule, but it’s not real.

Gene worked with a case. Used a habeas corpus and the judge threw it out because Gene failed to give a colorable claim. How can you give color to a pleading? Confession and avoidance. Gene did a lot of research in this area. Confession and avoidance is a common law remedy. You avoid the consequences of the action by the plaintiff and you avoid by defenses. This has been changed to rule 8 concerning defenses federal rules of civil procedure.. Letter of affirmative defense, the law of discharge, the law merchant, the law of principle and equity, the law of satisfaction, the law of bankruptcy. Are they bankrupt? Sure they are. You don’t want to rebut the presumption. You want to settle the account as the principle. When they monetize a debt they always have a principle on which they borrow all this money. Trafficant said we were going through the biggest bankruptcy and reorganization in the history of the US. He’s in jail because he dishonored the court. All these judges know there’s know money. Under common law only gold and silver is money. Title 12 section 211 and 212--The lawful money of the US is construed as gold and silver coin. Any federal reserve note is redeemable at any federal reserve bank or treasury office for lawful money. Title 31 section 5118 2d. HJR192.

They have to give you an out, a remedy. Affirmative defenses under rule 8 is my remedy for every commercial liability. These are prepaid accounts. The industrial society borrows money to manufacture product, like General Motors. They are on the public side of the accounting ledger. On one side of the ledger everything is private.

The principle is on one side, the debtor strawman is on the public side. That’s in the bankruptcy. You are the principle and the owner. You’re the stockholder, you’re the bank. This is not opinion, this is what is going on. Gene owns his own bank and drew up his own charter. You are the lienholder in this system. You own preferred stock and the common stock. The strawman is the beneficiary. Your exemption is in a bridge between the private side and the public side. That’s why you have the exemption.

Credits are liabilities and debits are assets. They can’t pass from the credit to the debit side, because we are constantly in dishonor. Debits are private and credits are public. They’re borrowing all this money using our credit. I am responsible for the strawman. The strawman name is on the complaint in court and the strawman is liable and has to pay. If the strawman doesn’t pay, I pay for him because I didn’t assume the responsibility as the fiduciary trustee and they sell the account. They don’t need a real complaint or a real warrant. It’s all colorable. They will not allow you to overcome them. You start arguing with them, not giving your name, they will drive you into submission and into contempt. Gene’s done all this. You don’t want to do this. They will kill you and collect the insurance money. I am insured by the FDIC and the FDIA under title 12 with a $10 million dollar policy. I’m worth more dead than alive. They’ll kill you without batting an eyelash. They killed a young woman by shooting her in the face with a pellet after the Red Sox won and she wasn’t doing anything.

The more people they kill the more money they make.

Judges and lawyers in Texas hired someone to shoot migrant workers and then they collected the insurance money on them. This is serious business. What does a creditor do? Pays his debts? I am the only one with any money. The banks don’t have money, everyone on the public side is bankrupt. Everyone who goes into court and argues with the judge over how they spell their name (all caps, etc). When you have ‘committed’ a felony they will appoint counsel. What you do is a letter Rogatory, a letter of advice. What goes in this letter Rogatory? You instruct the attorney that you are doing an acceptance for honor and you want an accounting of the total amount of the bill for full settlement and closure of the account and you give the case #, the cusip # and the autotris #. The letter Rogatory is in Clerk’s Praxis. What you say in the letter, you put your name in and “I ___________appoint ________(attorney’s name) as my fiduciary trustee, case #, autotris and cusip # , use my exemption for post settlement and closure of this case and account.” Date this and endorse it.

I’m actually creating all the money for the bank. They make derivatives and fractionalize it and makes trillions of dollars off me. Gene issued an international bill of exchange for his APA (parole officer) and they stopped billing him. They closed the account. He’s going after the bid bond, the performance bond and the payment bond–he wants them back. He’s the principle and he wants his capital and interest back.. After he did the international bill of exchange they arrested him and then let him go after 3 days. They quit billing him, the weekly parole bills. Dec 8, 1988, the US became a party to the municipal convention on the international bills of exchange.

They have insurance on the strawman and when you go in as an insurgent or belligerent,......... There is the war powers act and trading with the enemy act and you are subject to seizure wherever they find you. If you don’t allow them settlement and closure they will kill you without batting an eyelash. Don’t fire the attorney. Tell the judge that you are appointing the attorney as fiduciary trustee. When you go into court you have to be a gentleman, and don’t get vulgar. If you do things right you will not be held in contempt of court. Gene was charged with 3 counts of RICO, felony 1, 2 and 3, including intimidation. The only reason he spent any time in prison was that he couldn’t get his paperwork. He served 5 months. They dropped the first 2 counts.

They arrest you and what you want to do is go after the bid bond. There are two sets of bonds, the GSA 25, SF (standard form) . There are two sets of forms 24–bid bond, 25–performance bond, 25a is the payment bond.

Municipal convention supercedes article 3 of the UCC. This is in the official, master text of the UCC.



28 Likes19 Comments82 Shares