-
Re: Coronavirus
https://jamesfetzer.org/2022/02/pfiz...ovid-vaccines/
https://jamesfetzer.org/wp-content/u...--1024x546.jpg
Pfizer Steps Up Advertising for Its ‘Blockbuster’ Drug to Treat Heart Conditions, Including Those Caused by COVID Vaccines
Pfizer Steps Up Advertising for Its ‘Blockbuster’ Drug to Treat Heart Conditions, Including Those Caused by COVID Vaccines
February 26, 2022 James Fetzerblog
By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., is an independent journalist and researcher based in Athens, Greece.
Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb this month revived the “No Time to Wait” ad campaign urging people experiencing heart issues to visit their doctors. The two drugmakers developed and market Eliquis, the top-selling drug for the very heart conditions associated with people who received Pfizer’s COVID vaccine.
Two major pharmaceutical companies chose February, the month of love — or hearts — to launch an advertising campaign urging people experiencing heart issues for the first time to visit their doctors.
Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) this month revived the “No Time to Wait” ad campaign, spending $1.28 million on TV ads alone.
The campaign warns anyone experiencing palpitations and shortness of breath that they may be at increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), other types of blood clots and strokes — the same types of cardiovascular ailments found among people who have received COVID-19 vaccines.
The campaign urges viewers to seek early medical attention in order to reduce the risk of these serious complications." SNIP
___________________
Dachsie comment:
Pfizer Steps Up Advertising for Its ‘Blockbuster’ Drug to Treat Heart Conditions, Including Those Caused by COVID Vaccines
THEY never bothered to tell us anything at all about symptoms and conditions that might come from having received "the COVID vaccine." THEY give out the "vaccine" in drug stores and grocery stores to anybody and everybody who shows up for a "free vaccine." I asked a young woman who was working as a maid in my home if she had gotten the vaccine. Her reply was like " Yes, I was in CVS the other day and they were giving the vaccine so I just decided 'what the heck - why not? ' and I got the shot."
Don't we have enough information about the media and advertising and drugs and drug companies?
"side effects" [sequelae ] have to be shared on the drug package insert paper
https://www.eliquis.com/eliquis/hcp/...E&gclsrc=aw.ds
"ADVERSE REACTIONS
The most common and most serious adverse reactions reported with ELIQUIS were related to bleeding."
So the main serious side effect of taking the new drug, Eliquis, is bleeding.
The medicine causes the thing it is supposed to treat and cure. And all of this "bleeding" symptom is of a SERIOUS nature.
("Doctor" Dachsie deduces that taking this medicine Eliquis probably requires close monitoring by the prescribing doctor involving frequent blood tests and doctor visits.)
Side effects are not shown on the bascically blank paper in the package that contains the vial of COVID vaccine because these vaccines are classified as Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) / experimental / not approved.
Just to add a little more confusing information, abnormal vaginal "bleeding" and "clots" happen to unvaccinated females from living or working in close proximity to a vaccinated person. This is said to be caused by the "shedding" phenomena. something else most of our doctors do not tell us about. Don't even ask.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5Fhq68SXGDXM/
COVID Vaccine Shedding Hurting Unvaxed? Dr. Lee Merritt Explains
-
Re: Coronavirus
Doctors & Sciemtists Episode 19: "It's The Biggest FDA Scandal In History" Jaw-Dropping Interview With Whistleblower Linda Martin, Ph.D.
Doctors & Sciemtists Episode 19: "It's The Biggest FDA Scandal In History" Jaw-Dropping Interview With Whistleblower Linda Martin, Ph.D.
________________________________
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...klr.LnFRew--~D
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd?utm_source=salsa&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign =chd_tv&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=bd07fea4-b11b-4bbb-905c-a6bbb1cd1e8b
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv.svg
Live Every Thursday at 10:30a.m. PT, 12:30p.m. CT, 1:30p.m. ET • Get Text Alerts
This show aired live February 24, 2022
‘Doctors And Scientists’ With Brian Hooker, PHD.
Got Science? Are you sure?
Dr. Brian Hooker invites some of the leading voices in science and medicine to break down the studies and weigh in on the controversies so the rest of us have an opportunity to understand the science that drives public health policy and medical progress.
EMBEDDED VIDEO
50:28 video runtime
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd/Yo6ssepUaq
___________
https://www.fda.gov/media/77114/download
Margaret Hamburg, M.D.
05/22/2009 -
04/04/2015
https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-le.../commissioners
Dr. Hambirg's husband's name is Peter Brown
Peter Brown, Ph.D.
CEO, Renaissance Technologies
Scientific Advisory Board, Flatiron Institute
https://simonsfoundation.imgix.net/w...rop=faces&q=90
https://www.simonsfoundation.org/people/peter-brown/
-
Re: Coronavirus
For misinformational and dsinformational purposes only.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNc9PqIZ31M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNc9PqIZ31M
Kim Iversen: Bill Gates Says Omicron "SADLY" Better Than Vax At Building Covid Immunity
338,078 views
Feb 22, 2022
14K
The Hill
1.52M subscribers
Kim Iversen details Bill Gates' latest comments on the COVID-19 pandemic.
-
Re: Coronavirus
This is a 3 hour overview of information about "the vaccines." It is in the tone of a rant and points out what is not helpful about the information he is commenting upon. It is good up-to-date overview of the propaganda.
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...cJ_640x360.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VLDns24XnhcJ/
MSM Vaccine Propaganda Deconstruction, Liars Prepping People For "Deadly Pi Variant"
First published at 09:11 UTC on February 27th, 2022.
• #vaccines
• #miscarriages
• #dna
Tim Truth
Tim Truth
3:06:15
Note 3 hour plus video.
20488 subscribers
NEW Rokfin Channel LAUNCHED: https://rokfin.com/timtruth (join me there for exclusive reports & call in shows)
Join the leading researchers on https://GroupDiscover.com to find the best videos from across the censorship-resistant internet platforms like Odysee, Rumble, LBRY, Bitchute & Brighteon.
A
dd me on these great platforms: https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/ https://rumble.com/timtruth https://bitchute.com/timtruth/ https://GroupDiscover.com and https://flote.app/timtruth1
______________
Dachsie comment:
I have only listened to about the first half hour of this video and so I do not know what the " PI " variant is that THEY apparently are about to start pushing. I hope this is not "click bait" trick and you must listen to almost all of the video before you are told what the PI variant is.
Still this appears to be valuable general information about the latest information and propaganda and tricks and strategies used to put out this information.
I would comment that most people here now know not to take "the vaccine" at all under any circumstances, especially the more information we have that has come out about the FDA, CDC, and HHS / NIH and NIAID and how these federal agencies are totally under "regulatory capture", that is, they are owned and financed in various major and suspect ways by BigPharma. And there is no way we can give true "informed consent" to taking these vaccines.
(In many ways, it appears that the push for the vaccine is being slyly phased out now and there is a "new boss" being slyly pushed now, and "the new boss is the same as the old boss.")
However, what is being done to patients now is using of the "test" for COVID 19" in a coercive way. Thee tests are the new "proof of vaccine" that is, the new "passport."
There are three general categories of tests for "COVID-19":
the PCR test,
no longer authorized for use by the CDC as of 12-33-21. Long nasal swab of cribriform plate near brain. Results take several days to receive as are sent off to an out-of-state place.
the COVID 19 Rapid Antigen test
short swab in exterior part of nasal passage, immediate results on paper and/or tot your smart cell phone or ? to your email address if you don't have a smart phone ?.
at-home test
you get this test, a test kit, from a local drug store.
short swab in exterior part of nasal passage - I think
Results are fast but not immediate. Could take 24 to 48 hours.
Test results are digital only - a text to your smart cell phone
Dachsie does not think or see how the results from this at-home test could be used for official policy purposes by any entity. Too much room for error on the part of the patient in taking this at-home test. So I do not understand the purpose at all for these at-home COVID-19 tests. Perhaps just to train us Pavlovian dogs to training rules and impersonal procedures.
or not sure, ?? to your email address.
I think you must or may ? optionally register at an online web address and get a " code" and not exactly sure but think the code number must appear on the physical test sample you send in,
and not sure if your test submission is sent in by US mail or special mail service, whatever kit says.
My main point is that these test results are being used as acceptable for meeting the qualification requirement procedure for obtaining outpatient medical procedure at a hospital.
I do not know anything at all about the accuracy of these tests and do not know if the place where the outpatient medical procedure is to be performed notifies the patient that they may not get the outpatient procedure done if their test results show "positive" for having "COVID 19 virus."
These test results of "negative" or "positive" are just as suspect and meaningless as the PCR test. (We know about the "soup" that is the sample specimen that is examined under a lab microscope. We do not what is found to make the determination that the patient is "negative" for having "COVID 19 virus" or is "positive" for having "COVID 19 virus.")
Yet these tests are now required as "passport"or ticket to get outpatient surgery / / hospital medical procedure. IT is not known for sure how the test results, the passport, will be used by the outpatient procedure entity to determine whether you will be allowed to have outpatient medical procedure. It is assumed that this entity is separate from the medical care provider who will be performing the procedure, that is, "your doctor."
The word "Passport" is actually in the printed patient instruction sheet and is particularly offensive and suspect and authoritarian and coercive. (You cannot have medical procedure if you don't pass the test and provide proper proof of negative tests that are time/date certain. Your papers please!)
These tests are the new coercive trick to force behavior and submission on your part. We have zero information about the safety and effectiveness of these tests or meaningfulness of the test results.
___________
Dachsie makes special Edit or Amendment to these posting which is probably inaccurate regarding the "COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test."
There is a test that you may get or must get ? at a "testing center" and that test is given by a test giver person directly on the patient. It appears that that test AND the At-Home test are both the
" iHealth® COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test"
according to this FDA document...
https://www.fda.gov/media/153922/download
Report Adverse events, including problems with test performance or results, to MedWatch by submitting the online FDA Form 3500
(https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scrip...reporting.home) or by calling 1-800-FDA-1088
Page
FACT SHEET FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
iHealth Labs Inc. December 22, 2021
iHealth® COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test
Coronavirus
Disease 2019
(COVID-19)
5
Infection Control:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...ion-control/in
dex.html
Discontinuation of Isolation:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...ispositionin-h
ome-patients.html
FDA webpages:
General: www.fda.gov/novelcoronavirus
EUAs:(includes links to patient/individual fact sheets and
manufacturer’s instructions)
https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/...us-disease-201
9-covid-19-emergency-use-authorizations-medical-devices/in-v
itro-diagnostics-euas
Distributor Contact Information:
iHealth Labs, Inc.
120 San Lucar Ct, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, USA
1-855-816-7705 www.ihealthlabs.
_________________
Dachsie is even more puzzled by the fact that the FDA downloadable "Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers" document appears to tell about a testing product made by a manufacturer / corporate entity which may or may not be a legally separate entity from the FDA ?.
IHealth Labs, Inc.
This is a 5 page document that I may or may not try to post in a separate posting in this thread if it will fit in one posting.
Another vague area of information Dachsie perceives is that this IHealth COVID-19 Rapid Antigen test product is also under the FDA's classification as an "Emergency Use Authorization" EUA status.
Another vague area of information is that I do not know if IHealth test product is only one of several tests of several companies / corporations that have a similar test product now in use.
And I do not know if the particular brand name of the test that I may take at a local testing center is the Ihealth brand of test or if it is another brand and whether that other brand of test has the EUA FDA status of being "authorized."
And I do not know if the information fact sheet applies to the administrator of the test, the natural person, who gives the swab test to another natural person at a "testing center" or is there a different "FDA Fact sheet" for each different kind of EUA authorized test.
And I do not know if "testing center" is the correct legal term for a physical facility building / office where legally authorized COVID-19 tests are administered. Seems those "testing centers" ought to have the EUA official FDA designation too.
(I will not even think about who exactly owns stock in these testing manufacturers and testing centers.)
Onward through the fog.
Dachsie
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT5LKPAFkOA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT5LKPAFkOA
I want to mention again this posting of mine of this same video
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...uci#post986408
1. 26th January 2022, 04:51 PM
Thread: Coronavirus
by Dachsie
Replies
2,773
Views
188,630
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT5LKPAFkOA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT5LKPAFkOA
Docs Reveal Fauci Gave 4 Scientists Who Pushed ‘Natural Origins’ Narrative $50M in Grant Funding
...
____________
There is a current in-force legal judgement and injunction by the New York State Supreme Court that makes it illegal for schools or businesses to require people to wear masks, yet Hochul governor not happy and New York City ordinance ? executive order ? still requires schools and businesses to require students and people / customers to wear masks.
This appears to break the law and injunction but even though state of New York entities must follow the legal ruling, the City of New York appears able to ignore the law in this matter. Schools and businesses are still requiring masks within the boundaries of New York City.
I do not know what is really happening right now in New York and/or New York City as far as schools and businesses requiring masks to be worn and if there has been a change in the law since the January 25, 2022 legal ruling, I do not know about that either.
Dachsie always had the understanding that if there is a legal injunction in force on the state of New York, that injunction applies also to "cities," and all other legal subdivision governmental entities of the state of New York.
The second half of this reposted video shows how grant money was greatly increased to certain scientists by NIAID / Dr. Fauci, scientists who promoted and advocated for the "natural origin of the virus" part of the official narrative.
All of these possible examples of unlawful conduct are in the current news again and the PLANdemic is crumbling before our very eyes.
-
Re: Coronavirus
Ralph Winterrowd has been covering the federal agencies scam. All these federal agencies are outside of the constitution, but were allowed to operate by congress.
The main thing that gives them clout is the stupidity of the American people who volunteer to be U.S. Citizens which is a federal citizen. The only place that U.S. Citizen is a natural status is for all American's who are born in the District of Columbia. That is the country congress created while we were not looking.
Then there is the matter of old King George, who really did not lose the revolutionary war. He retained his interest in the territory of the United States and secured a place for all his loyal subjects who remained as "Free Inhabitants". He did grant American's sovereign status in their States, as long as we used his bank.
Anyhow the Agencies publish all their law in the Federal Registry and are forbidden to use Statutory code. According to Ralph they don't really follow the rules that make it law, but the courts go along with the charade to hang the U.S. Citizens.
https://www.republicbroadcastingarch...3-2022-hour-2/
https://media.blubrry.com/rbn/b/ins....-23_180005.mp3
just listened to a little of this; 6 minute mark, but Ralph kind of rambles as he has no script.
-
Re: Coronavirus
"Anyhow the Agencies publish all their law in the Federal Registry and are forbidden to use Statutory code. According to Ralph they don't really follow the rules that make it law, but the courts go along with the charade to hang the U.S. Citizens. "
Thanks BigJon for your posting. I would like to a link where Mr. Winterowd makes these comments.
I dp know that in the state of Texas, regulations are written based on statutory laws passed by the state legislature and those rules (regulations) go through a time period of public comment about the proposed regulation and then once the rule becomes accepted are then placed in and become part of the Texas Administrat8ve Code and The Texas Register publication which is The Texas registry entity.
The rule making procedure is followed by the particular state agency that is drawing up the rule and taking comments about the proposed regulation.
But it is the office of the Texas Secretary of State agency that publishes the Texas Register and posts the comments from the public in each weekly publication.
Then after the legally allowed period of time for public comments has completed and any and all public comments are considered, the regulation is "accepted" and the rule text, the regulation text, is electronically sent to the Secretary of State's office and there it is codified into The Texas Administrative Code and the fully accepted regulation is posted in the Texas Register AND is part of the Texas Administrative Code and is part of the "registry."
I think the state procedure is supposed the same format of procedures as for statutory laws made by the state legislatures and by the Federal regulations made by federal agencies.
It is pretty easy to see the vague nature of regulations and referring to them as "law" as though they were of the same nature and power as state or federal statutory law.
I have a big thick book that postulates that all state laws of Texas are lies and really not legal law at all. I have not looked at it in a long time,
"The State of Texas is a Liar". by Daniel Lee Schinzing
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL1170...exas_is_a_Liar!
I remember looking at the place in Texas Statutory Code law books for the enabling legislation for the State of Texas sales and use tax and I was impressed by unimpressive that wording was in the law. A real nothing burger statute. It was hard to see exactly what was being enabled and enacted in that state law.
Onward through the fog.
Dachsie
-
Re: Coronavirus
Dachsie comment:
Kim Iverson does very good job of conveying unbiased valid information about the "vaccine" up until about 8:38 of video where she starts sophisticated muddled explanation that she does not blame BigPharma and she more blames government.
We all know very well, including "fully independent" Kim Iverson, at this point that there is no distinction to be made between BigPharma and government.
The government federal agencies involved are owned and operated by BigPharma. The power and the money and the media belong solely to BigPharma. The federal agencies that we used to be able to trust, and the clinics, hospitals, nurses and doctors that we used to be able to trust and rely on now take orders directly from the CDC that is part of the World Economic Forum. Some of the government agencies are nothing more than Agenda 2030 "public / private partnerships.
BigPharma has bought off government and BigPharma has bought off science. BigPharma is, from all indications, the globalist multi-billionaire elites.
Dachsie sees that we are in a time of revealing, a time "when everything that is covered will be revealed, and all that is secret will be made known to all. "
____________________
Mathew 10:26
“But don’t be afraid of those who threaten you. For the time is coming when everything that is covered will be revealed, and all that is secret will be made known to all. "
__________________
Pfizer Makes Historic Amounts Of Money While Worrying About Upcoming Trial Data Dump
36,145 views
Feb 15, 2022
Kim Iversen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVdxWLJMZqA
10:25 total video runtime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVdxWLJMZqA
Thank you for watching the fully independent Kim Iversen Show. Sign up for my FREE email newsletter here: http://KimIversenemailsignup.com (I will never spam you or sell your info)
Become a member of my LOCALS community here: https://kimiversen.locals.com
You will gain access to exclusive content, behind-the-scenes videos, valuable information, and even connect with me personally and others as well. It's a great way to support my independent media channel while receiving more content.
Other ways to support the channel include PayPal
https://paypal.me/KimIversenShow
Follow Kim on Instagram: @KimIversen
Find Kim on Facebook: @KimIversenOfficial
The audio version of this show is available on:
iTunes: https://apple.co/2O38qVR
Google Play: https://bit.ly/2HrrGfk
Stitcher: https://bit.ly/2TNUGnk
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/2XWWcTl
Dachsie sees that we are in a time of revealing, a time "when everything that is covered will be revealed, and all that is secret will be made known to all. "
____________________
Mathew 10:26
“But don’t be afraid of those who threaten you. For the time is coming when everything that is covered will be revealed, and all that is secret will be made known to all. "[/SIZE]
-
Re: Coronavirus
Covid Deaths Up 495% in January Among Triple Vaccinated ~ From Scotland
Official data from Public Health Scotland confirms the vaccinated population have accounted for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths over the past two months.
But a side by side comparison of those two months suggests the Covid-19 booster campaign has been a complete failure because the percentage of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths have all gone down in the unvaccinated population whilst increasing drastically in the triple vaccinated population.
The Exposé is now heavily censored by Google, Facebook, Twitter and PayPal. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…
EMAIL ADDRESS
SUBSCRIBE
Nicola Sturgeon the First Minister of Scotland has insisted that mask wearing and vaccine passports will remain in Scotland despite Boris Johnson the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom scrapping both requirements at the end of January, and pledging to possibly scrap all remaining restrictions towards the end of February.
Mask wearing, as anyone with an oune of intelligence should know, is of course completely pointless because the virus is small enough to penetrate the holes found in surgical masks and FFP3 masks. So the cloth masks sold by Dr Julia Grace Patterson (an unregistered doctor who is really a psychiatrist) and her EveryDoctor venture are just borderline idiotic.
But what’s fast becoming even more idiotic is the idea that a vaccine passport system is the way forward, because official Public Health Scotland data shows it is the vaccinated who are most likely to spread Covid-19, it is the vaccinated who are most likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19, and it is the vaccinated who are most likely to die of Covid-19.
Covid-19 Cases
Public Health Scotland (PHS) publish a weekly Covid-19 Statistical report containing data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status.
The following chart has been collated from data found in table 11 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical Report published 12th Jan 22, and table 12 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical Report published 9th Feb 22, and it shows the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status betweeen 11th Dec 21 and 7th Jan 22, and between 8th Jan and 4th Feb 22.
Overall cases have dropped in the last month in all demographics significantly compared to the number of cases recorded between 11th Dec and 7th Jan 22, but in both months the vaccinated have accounted for the vast majority of cases.
The main difference between the two months is that the double vaccinated accounted for the majority of cases between 11th Dec and 8th Jan 22; recording 145,890 cases, but the triple vaccinated accounted for the majority of cases between 8th Jan and 4th Feb 22; recording 46,951 cases.
However, despite cases declining in all demographics over the past two months the data is still quite concerning in regards to the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections, because as is illustrated in the following chart; the percentage of Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated has descreased, whilst the percentage of cases among the vaccinated has increased significantly, but mainly in the tripple jabbed.
Between 11th Dec and 7th Jan 22 the unvaccinated population accounted for 15% of cases, but fast forward one month and we find that between 8th Jan and 4th Feb 22 the unvaccinated only accounted for 13% of cases despite the huge roll-out of the third dose to millions in December.
The vaccinated population accounted for 85% of cases between 11th Dec and 7th Jan 22, with 9% of those cases among the one-dose vaccinated, 32% of those cases among the triple vaccinated, and 59% of those cases among the double vaccinated.
But fast forward one month and we find that the vaccinated accounted for 87% of cases, with the one-dose vaccinated accounting for 4% of those cases, the double vaccinated accounting for 33% of those cases, and the triple vaccinated accounting for 63% of those cases.
This means that despite cases falling among all demographics they actually fell the most among the not vaccinated, single vaccinated, and double vaccinated, with the lowest drop coming in the triple vaccinated. This doesn’t make sense if the Covid-19 vaccines are effective. Clearly they are not, at least when it comes to preventing infection.
Covid-19 Hospitalisations
The following chart has been collated from data found in table 12 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical Report published 12th Jan 22, and table 13 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical Report published 9th Feb 22, and it shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status betweeen 11th Dec 21 and 7th Jan 22, and between 8th Jan and 4th Feb 22.
The main difference between the data on hospitalisations and the data on cases is that overall hospitalisations have increased in the most recent month compared to the number of hospitalisations recorded between 11th Dec and 7th Jan 22, but that increase is only down to a huge increase in hospitalisations among the triple vaccinated population because hospitalisations among all other demographics including the unvaccinated decreased.
Hospitalisations among the unvaccinated fell by -24% to 402 compared to 545 in December. Hospitalisations among the one-dose vaccinated also fell but by just -1.6% from 123 to 121, and hospitalisations among the double vaccinated fell by -28.7% from 763 to 544.
But hospitalisations among the triple vaccinated increased by 88% to 1,430 compared to 762 in December.
This again raises questions surrounding the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections, because as is illustrated in the following chart; the percentage of Covid-19 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated has descreased, whilst the percentage of hospitalisations among the vaccinated has increased significantly, but only because of the triple vaccinated.
Between 11th Dec and 7th Jan 22 the unvaccinated population accounted for 25% of hospitalisations, but fast forward one month and we find that between 8th Jan and 4th Feb 22 the unvaccinated only accounted for 19.5% of hospitalisations despite the huge roll-out of the third dose to millions in December.
The vaccinated population accounted for 75% of hospitalisations between 11th Dec and 7th Jan 22, with 7% of those hospitalisations among the one-dose vaccinated, 46% of those hospitalisations among the triple vaccinated, and 47% of those hospitalisations among the double vaccinated.
But fast forward one month and we find that the vaccinated accounted for 80.5% of hospitalisations, with the one-dose vaccinated accounting for 6% of those hospitalisations, the double vaccinated accounting for 26% of those hospitalisations, and the triple vaccinated accounting for 68% of those hospitalisations.
This doesn’t make sense if the Covid-19 vaccines are effective. Clearly they are not, at least when it comes to preventing both infection and hospitalisation.
Covid-19 Deaths
The following chart has been collated from data found in table 13 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical Report published 12th Jan 22, and table 14 of the PHS Covid-19 Statistical Report published 9th Feb 22, and it shows the number of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status betweeen 4th Dec and 31st Dec 21, and between 1st Jan and 28th Jan 22.
Unlike cases, but just like hospitalisations, deaths rose overall between 1st Jan and 28th Jan 22 compared to the number recorded in December, and yet again this was solely due to the triple vaccinated population.
Deaths rose from 40 among the triple vaccinated between 4th Dec and 31st Dec 21, to a concerning 238 between 1st Jan and 28th Jan 22. This represents a 495% increase in deaths compared to just a 30% increase in deaths among the unvaccinated population at the same time rising from 46 to just 60.
This once again raises serious questions regarding the effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, because as is illustrated in the following chart; the percentage of Covid-19 deaths in the unvaccinated has descreased, whilst the percentage of deaths among the vaccinated has increased significantly, but again only because of the triple vaccinated.
Between 4th Dec and 31st Dec 21 the unvaccinated population accounted for 19% of deaths, but fast forward one month and we find that between 1st Jan and 28th Jan 22 the unvaccinated only accounted for 14% of deaths despite the huge roll-out of the third dose to millions in December.
The vaccinated population accounted for 81% of deaths between 4th Dec and 31st Dec 21, with 9% of those deaths among the one-dose vaccinated, 21% of those deaths among the triple vaccinated, and 70% of those deaths among the double vaccinated.
But fast forward one month and we find that the vaccinated accounted for 86% of deaths, with the one-dose vaccinated accounting for 4% of those deaths, the double vaccinated accounting for 32% of those deaths, and the triple vaccinated accounting for 64% of those deaths.
This doesn’t make sense if the Covid-19 vaccines are effective. Clearly they are not effective at preventing transmission or infection. They are not effective at preventing hospitalisation, and they are not effective at preventing death. They seem to actually make things considerably worse.
Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated
The following chart shows the percentage of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations by vaccination status in Scotland between 11th Dec 21 and 4th Feb 22, and the percentage of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in Scotland between 4th Dec 21 and 28th Jan 22.
Official Pulic Health Scotland data shows that the vaccinated population accounted for 86% of Covid-19 cases, 80% of Covid-19 hospitalisations, and 84% of Covid-19 deaths. Therefore, Scotland is in the midst of a ‘Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated’ and Nicola Sturgeon should scrap the discriminatory and idiotic vaccine passport system that she chose to introduce in Scotland with immediate effect.
-
Re: Coronavirus
Excerpt from article announcing Public Health Scotland, the equivalent of the CDC in the USA, does not intend to release their data to the public anymore to "protect-public-reaching-bad-conclusions".
In other words they are going to cancel the public's right to know the truthful data. Not having the factual accurate data can add to the killing and deaths. But the evil people we are dealing with do not care about their killing actions. They are driven completely by their evil obsession for a One World Death and Slavery System for all.
In other words the PHS is acting in totalitarian way, just like the CDC recently withheld, hid, a large part of the data in a report that was exposed in this video...
Go to 0:53 on the YouTube video to hear and see about this particular trick / deception by the CDC.
(Seems a recent release of Data by the CDC regarding the effectiveness of boosters (the third of the "triple jabed" deliberately lied by omission by leaving out the data in the report for "18 to 49-year-olds"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcgppoM5X5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcgppoM5X5s
This video also mentioned Scotland's decision to stop giving vaccine data to the public.
https://www.publichealthscotland.sco...s/phs-logo.png
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...ad-conclusions
Public Health Scotland Stops Releasing COVID Data To Protect The Public From Reaching Bad Conclusions
by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Feb 22, 2022 - 02:30 AM
Authored by Jonathan Turley,
"Public Health Scotland (PHS) is upset that critics are using its data to oppose Covid mandates and policies. PHS believes that the anti-vaxxers are seizing on the data to undermine its case for continued mandates. One official is quoted as saying that “[t]he case rates, hospitalization rates, the death rates are very simple statistics” and critics are misreading the data “inappropriately and sometimes willfully.”
The solution?
PHS will reportedly stop sharing the data with the public. It appears that it is not enough for companies like Twitter to ban critics from social media. Now, citizens will be protected not just from opposing views but information that will only confuse them."
SNIP
I think I am coming down with a bad conclusion.
Onward through the fog.
Dachsie
