Anna von Reitz: Answers to Questions

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

What State Assemblies Can Do

Many people are just plain missing the point.
Not only do you have to reclaim your political status as an American to be able to access your rights and guarantees under the Constitution and to avoid foreign taxation, you have to do this to re-populate, officially, your States of the Union.

If your State is "vacant", the Pope and the Queen will seize it as abandoned property and steal it without firing a shot.

So there you have the carrot and the stick.

Now let's add another carrot.

Once you have your State Assembly up and functioning, that State Assembly (not "State of State" Assembly--- State Assembly) can tell the State of State Legislature how high to jump and what you want corrected.

Bogus Mortgages and Lending Practices leading to equally bogus Foreclosures? Tell the State of State Legislature that the State Assembly demands a Moratorium on all Foreclosures affecting State Nationals within the borders of your State.

Fed up with CPS stealing kids? Tell the State of State Legislature that the State Assembly supports keeping families together and objects to mis-characterizing marriages as Joint Business Ventures and to the licensing of marriages in general.

Tell the State of State Legislature that you are dissatisfied with their presumptions and their activities registering American babies improperly as British Territorial or Municipal citizens --- and you want it stopped in your State.

Tell the State of State Legislature that you displeased with the racketeering that agents of the IRS (Municipal) and Internal Revenue Service (Territorial) are carrying out against people in your State who don't receive any Federal Income and aren't obligated to keep records for foreign governments.

Your State Assemblies formed by properly declared American State Citizens have vast powers that can be exercised to correct all of these evils and many more.

So quit whining and crying and fighting with these yahoos. Adopt and declare your proper birthright political status, join and operate your State Assembly, and start cracking the whip. Issue Declarations of Protest and Remonstrance to the State of State Legislature operating in your State of the Union, and if it is a "Federal Issue" to the Congress as well.

They work for you, you don't work for them.

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·

American Catholics

In Southcentral Alaska we have a Catholic radio station. It re-broadcasts Catholic news and views programming from around the world. It often pops up loud and clear on my radio dial as I am driving around and if there is an interesting discussion going on, I listen in.

This week I caught a discussion about the sanctity of life and how the answer to the one question, "Is life sacred?" then leads to extremely disparate results.

If life is sacred, the speaker, a senior cleric explained, then we must respect the dignity and rights of living beings.

But if life is not sacred, then nothing connected to life is sacred, either.
It is then possible to justify murder and rape and theft and all sorts of immoral things based on the assumption that life is not sacred. It all becomes "relative", if life itself is not sacred.

I could have joined in and said, well, then, if you understand that, why has your Church tolerated The Collective Entity Doctrine, which claims that living people are equivalent to and interchangeable with dead legal fiction entities?

Why has the Church stood by and allowed members of the Bar Associations, including Catholic Attorneys, to use grossly misleading "terms of art" like "human" (colored people) and "natural person" (corpse, dead body) and let them create "infant decedent estates" to defraud and manipulate living people?

Why has your Church carried on a de facto persecution of innocent living people of all faiths, knowing that most Americans don't actually owe "Peter's Pence" at all?

If life is sacred, why stand by and allow living people to be demeaned as "dead" legal fiction entities or literal corpses, either?

I was steaming away like The Little Teapot.

Oh, I applaud the Roman Catholic Church for holding the line against abortion. But what good does it do, when the same Roman Catholic Church oversees the "killing" of these same babies on paper, denies them their sacred nature, and reduces them to the level of legal fictions a few days or weeks after they are born?

If life is sacred, then it must be sacred in all times and places, including courtrooms, and the ownership interests owed to living people must be respected in all jurisdictions of the law.

Nobody blessed to live can be reduced to the level of a fictional character or an inanimate thing-- a corporation of any kind; life, if it is sacred, can never be diminished by the color of anyone's skin, and nobody can be described as a "corpse" while still drawing breath.

I'm sorry, but you can't preach to me about the sanctity of life with one breath, but then, with a few lies and the stroke of a pen, reduce those same living babies to the level of corporate fictions--- a dead man's estate, a public transmitting utility, a public charitable trust, a foundation, an LLC.....

I pulled into my driveway just as the next topic came up: original sin.
Again, the speaker explained the standard Catholic doctrine -- that Original Sin resulted in man trying to play God, and make moral judgments that mankind is incapable of.

But, just that morning, I had read in the news that Pope Francis is considering making environmental damage a sin. A sin. And an excuse for more blame and taxation, of course.

Looks like Francis is ready to eat the apple, core and all.

In the early 1960's at the time of Vatican II, just about the same time that President Kennedy was killed, the Roman Catholic Church went off track.

It eschewed Latin as part of the Mass, but vastly stepped up the use of DOG LATIN to tax and defraud and mischaracterize living people as THINGS---- in direct contradiction to its avowed stance on the sanctity of life. It has been merrily committing paper genocide, indulging in the Justinian Deceit, denying the living status of living people ever since.

The Roman Catholic Church has been preaching one thing and practicing another for decades, until now we have the spectacle of pedophiles as priests and Jesuits as Popes and Pope Francis defining new sins.

Apparently, God forgot one?

How about this? It's wrong to lie about and defraud little babies in their cradles. It's wrong to steal from, enslave, harass, disrespect, cheat, lie to or lie about anyone.

I sat there in my car and watched the snow falling in the twilight. The priest on the radio seemed so calm and reasonable. His voice was reassuring. He seemed to be saying, everything's all right, the snail is on his thorn and God is in his heaven....

I could see why a presentation like this would be very comforting to Catholics hungering for positive, simple, solid, spiritual guidance.
If you weren't also aware of the double-dealing going on at the Bureau of Vital Statistics---and the Catholic Church's role in it, you would certainly never suspect that anything was amiss and never imagine that the Church was in on the Dead Baby Scam and still promoting it.

Just as Americans in general have to wake up and smell the garbage, American Catholic have the extra duty to smell the rot in their own Church and they bear the ethical and practical responsibility to clean it up.

This is not a task I envy anyone, and given the strict hierarchy of the Church, I am not sure how such a clean up and clear out can be done. I only know that it desperately needs to be done and I hope that the many sincere Catholics I have known will be guided, inspired, and enabled to shut down the "Dead Baby" identity theft scam, racketeering "gifts", and all the other criminal and quasi-criminal activities their Church has been involved in.

The ends do not justify the means, no matter what you say or how you say it, or whatever excuses are made for the violent racketeering and other crimes that have been committed here and all over the world by the Roman Catholic Church. Nobody here attacked the Church. The Church attacked us in Gross Breach of Trust and profited from it.
That's the ugly truth that is owed sincere amends to the actual victims.

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

The Montana Question

One of the people in Montana who has worked hard to help build the State Assembly there was forced to leave Montana seven months ago.
She has continued to try to help organizing efforts there, but, because she no longer lives in the State (despite still owning land and property there) and has no set plan for returning, there is no basis for her to act as Coordinator for Montana nor to retain State Citizenship there beyond the limits of the State residency requirements.

When we move from one State to another, we have to establish "residency" in the new State. "Residency" is a temporary status and does not imply that you are settling down forever and ever in that State. Ironically, most of us have unknowingly been living as "residents" in our own home States because we didn't know we had to record our being born there, or because we failed to actually adopt a new State when we moved.

Most States have published standards for how long you can be out of State before you are no longer considered to be living in that State, and for how long you can be a visitor in a new State before declaring residency there. The key words to look for in the General Session Laws are "living" and "homestead" and "residency".

I don't off-hand know the Montana laws for this, but I know that in Alaska, if you are gone more than 180 days out of the year, you no longer qualify to be considered an Alaskan.

The States of the Union have never allowed Dual Citizenship, and that includes Citizenship in any two States as well as State-Federal combinations.

The Founders considered Dual Citizenship to be a potential conflict of interest and against the Biblical injunction that "No man can serve two Masters" so none of the soil and land jurisdiction States allow it.

If you think about it briefly, you will see that State Citizens by definition need to be living in the State where they claim State Citizenship.

Otherwise, you could have people who were actually living in California, for example, but claiming to be Nevada Citizens, and then deciding the fate of people and assets in Nevada.

Nobody on the receiving end of such an arrangement would consider that fair or equitable, so it is not allowed, nor should it be.

For some reason, our friend in Montana is struggling over these facts and claiming that people outside of Montana are deciding things "for" Montana and "meddling" in Montana's affairs and so on and so forth in her struggle to remain active in Montana and not establish new State Citizenship where she is living now-- but it has always been this way and it has nothing to do with anyone meddling with anything.

We can't be two places at once, though sometimes we all wish we could.

State Coordinators are volunteer State Citizens who have taken on the job of helping others get their political status declarations done and recorded, and who are spearheading the effort to organize their State Assembly. This isn't any official "office" of the State Assembly. It's just another job that needs to get done.

It wouldn't be fair to have people who are living in other States acting as your State Coordinator(s), just like it wouldn't be right to have people from other States voting in your State elections.

So, no, you can't be living in California for most of the year and claiming to be a State Citizen of Montana. It just doesn't work that way.

Please note: you have to live and make your permanent home in the State where you claim your State Citizenship, but your State National status travels with you.

In other words, I will always be a State National of Wisconsin because I was born in Wisconsin, but unless I actually live in Wisconsin, I can't be a State Citizen of Wisconsin

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

Understanding Source and Cause; Q and The Plan

There are three (3) dates and three entities that every American should have cause to know and to memorize. All three occurred during The War of Independence.

The first is the publication of The Unanimous Declaration of Independence on 4 July 1776. This created "The Union" known as The United States.

The then-colonies redefined themselves over a period of years first as the "United Colonies" and later as "estates". The soil jurisdiction holdings were defined as private holdings of separate nations and the geographic bounds of what would become States were recognized as (e)states belonging to the people living within those boundaries, both as public and private holdings.

In the Roman system of nomenclature this gave rise to states including: new york, massachusetts, rhode island, new hampshire, etc. while in the English nomenclature, gave rise to New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, etc.

The second is the creation of The United States of America on 9 September 1776. This created "The Federation of States", an unincorporated Holding Company.

This secondary "union" represents the international land and sea jurisdiction which underlies the soil of each (e)state and the international powers accorded to each State which were combined for mutual aid and benefit. This Federation of unincorporated States is the "doing business as" name of the American States and People.

The third is the creation of the States of America on 1 March 1781. This Confederation of States was formed under The Articles of Confederation to serve as an incorporated business structure doing business in the global jurisdiction of the air under the charter of the Several States and in their mutual behalf.

Both The United States and The United States of America are unincorporated entities, free-standing and existing under the direct provisions of the sovereign States and People.

By contrast, the States of America was created as a separate chartered business enterprise of the Several States and People to provide essential government services in the realm of global commerce.

There is a clear progression and delegation of power inherent to this process.
The (e)states (national jurisdiction) gave rise to the States (international jurisdiction) and the States gave rise to The States of States (global commerce jurisdiction).

There is an equally distinct progress in kind.
The Union known as The United States is "corporate" in that is stands apart from each separate and sovereign (e)state and so is our Federation doing business as The United States of America, but neither one of these entities are incorporated. They are independent, free-standing entities that are designed to do mutual business for the (e)states of the living people and the Estates of the Lawful People of this country, in two separate jurisdictions: national and international, respectively.

The Confederation begun in 1781 is chartered by the individual States and incorporated by them using The Articles of Confederation.
The difference is akin to the difference between two independent businesses and a commercial corporation.

Thus you may think of Massachusetts as an independent business and The United States of America as a Federation of independent businesses. You may also think of Massachusetts and the People thereof as granting a charter to The State of Massachusetts and then authorizing its membership in a Confederation of similar state-of-state franchises doing business as the States of America.

So there are three (3) different entities right from the start, separate in name, separate in jurisdiction, separate in date of creation, and separate in kind: union, federation, confederation.

The United States, The United States of America, and the States of America each served a different function and were designed to operate in different capacities.

The United States, a union of states formed by Unanimous Declaration, derives its existence from the (e)states and living people of this country.

The United States of America derives its existence from the land jurisdiction States and the Lawful Persons known as People of each State.

The States of America derives its existence from the States and People granting charters to States-of-States and thence to their Confederation.

The States of America, the Confederation of States of States, is the missing piece that went off-line during the Civil War.

This country has been operating like a 12-cylinder engine firing on six cylinders ever since and nobody bothered to explain the situation to the populace so that this could be corrected.

Therein lies the specific Gross Breach of Trust amounting to Fraud which has been committed against us by our own Government Service Subcontractors and Employees, both Military and Federal Civil Service.

People often ask me about "Q" and "The Plan".

It seems like that elements in the Military and Intelligence Community have been working for some time to correct their operations and honor their actual service commitments; I have no argument against "Q" and their treatment of the Deep State Actors as criminals --- for such, they are.

This is not now and never has been about politics, race, religion, or much of anything other than fraud and commercial crimes.

This is about identity theft, impersonation, constructive fraud, unlawful conversion of assets, inland piracy, human trafficking, enslavement, illegal securitization, patent, trademark and copyright fraud and infringement, press-ganging, peonage, extortion, racketeering, kidnapping, collusion, conspiracy against the Constitutions and a host of other heinous crimes-- mostly of a commercial nature-- and all committed against the people of this country and our estates.

Perhaps it was the existence of 800 FEMA camps and industrial-scale foreign military operations staging out of Free Trade Zones within these United States that finally jolted at least some members of the Joint Chiefs awake and alerted patriotic members of the Officer Corps and Senior Enlisted.

Maybe it was our General Civil Orders issued in July of 2014, denying them all any plausible deniability, that kicked the football hard enough to get things moving.

So long as the ball is moving in the right direction, and the restoration of good order and public safety is secured, we can't complain about their initiative and the arrest of large numbers of criminals.

We estimate that if law already standing on the books were to be satisfied, upward of two million people in this country would have to be arrested and charged with heinous offenses against their fellow man and against the lawful government of this country.

We must, however, point out that these actions are not, by themselves, sufficient to restore the government we are heir to, nor to provide for its correct functioning.

In order to get the 12-cylinder engine back up and running, we have to assemble our States of the Union, we have to severally charter new American States of States, and restore the States of America Confederation in order to do that.

Beyond that, we must invest in educating a great many people about their actual government and their responsibility for it. Self-governance begins with attitudes learned and responsibilities accepted at home, at school, at work, and in the social fabric of a country. It cannot be achieved by the promotion of dependency and victimhood and unearned trust.

Our country has been steered off track deliberately and kept off track for generations by foreign interests we mistook as friends, allies, and treaty partners. They have used us as gun fodder in their wars for profit, and stolen us blind for 150 years.

It cannot be supposed that restoration of our government or our educational system can happen over night, after such a long and damaging period of abuse by foreign powers and misdirected public employees. Instead, we must patiently expose and understand the rot we are dealing with, and secure as much assistance, good will, and understanding as possible going forward.

This same system of deceit, impersonation, identity theft, a commercial criminality has infested not only "the US" Territorial and Municipal Governments, but similar incorporated governmental services corporations worldwide.

So, by all means, let the Q Plan materialize, but let's not fall asleep again and think, oh, goodie, things are back on track....because it will take major work on all our parts to finally accomplish the restoration of our self-governance.

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Land and Soil; Domicile and Home

When we formally and officially and in public record our re-conveyance of our Trade Name back to the "land and soil" of an American State, we are establishing our connection to both the soil (top 6 inches of dirt) and land (everything below the soil).

It's impossible to have land without soil or soil without land, so we say, "land and soil", yet under British land law, which is where we inherited this system, land represents a separate international jurisdiction, while soil is understood to be the national jurisdiction.

This same bifurcation of land and soil results in the concept of "domicile" and "homestead" as two separate but closely related aspects of actual life.

Living people have homes and homesteads. Lawful Persons and Legal Persons have domiciles - their principal places of business.

So when we say that we re-convey our Trade Name to the land and soil, we mean that we are conveying both our living self, one of the people, and our Lawful Person, one of the People, as the two unincorporated jurisdictions are inextricably linked: land and soil, domicile and home, Lawful People and living people.

And just like you can't have land without soil or soil without land, you can't have a lawful domicile without a home or a home without a lawful domicile, a Lawful Person without a living man or woman, and vice-versa,

So now we have people claiming that they have "a" domicile as a Person in Montana, but they don't actually live in Montana anymore.
This can only pertain to Legal Persons, which are not tied to carbon-based, actual, factual bodies.

Our Lawful Persons which are one of the People and which are State Citizens, are very much attached to our physical habitation, whether a house made of blood and bone or a house made of wood and stone, in the same way that soil and land are actually part of each other and inextricably combined.

As a result, it is impossible for a Lawful Person to exist and conduct business apart from a specific living man or woman being present. Lawful Persons are attached to us in the same way that the soil is attached to the land. State Citizens are all Lawful Persons.

I can't send my Lawful Person to school or market "for" me, because my Lawful Person does not exist apart from me. At most, I might send another man or woman to act as my agent or proxy.

So claiming that you have a permanent domicile in say, Ohio, while you are in fact living in another State, can only pertain to Legal Persons --- your STRAWMAN for example, was domiciled in Puerto Rico before you Expatriated the NAME and brought it home.

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

For Steven Charles.

When you were a little kid and you did something wrong, what did you do?

You tried to cover up and remove the evidence of the wrong-doing. You swept up the broken pieces of pottery. You hid the ruined shirt in the rag bin in the garage.... and what else did you do? You lied about it if confronted.

I'm not a little kid, but the members of Congress have acted like little kids over the years that the Great Fraud has been ongoing. And so have the members of the Court System. There have been endless efforts to hide what they don't want us to see --- annotations, archiving, re-numbering, re-naming, and re-sorting---- all to obscure records. From time to time, they've even outright destroyed the evidence of what actually went on. We call this process "moving the cheese" and it is as common as dirt.

Without any reference to what you tried to do overall, it's impossible to comment, but what I can tell you is that back then the Congress was aware of wearing different "hats" as it dealt with issues coming from different jurisdictions.

The Continental Congress was in session on September 9, 1776, and any action that they took regarding the land jurisdiction would be properly recorded in the Congressional Record, not the Congressional Register; furthermore, they would be acting all across the board --- conducting air, land, and sea business as separate issues, but switching from one subject area to the next in an orderly fashion. This results in two different kinds of records -- the Register and the actual Congressional Record, plus three different venues: national, international, and global.

So what they did in fact in the air jurisdiction (which derives from the Unum Sanctum Trust that was established more than 400 years prior and is no more a figment of my imagination than you are) on that day ( which later becomes part of the records as a Municipal Government action and where you found this ) is what you posted above:

"Resolved, that in all Continental Commissions, and other Instruments where heretofore the Words, “United Colonies,” have been used, the Stile be altered for the future to the United States."

So, Steven Charles, Big Mouth, Accuser, Know-It-All ---- let's see if you know what a "Continental Commission" is? And in what context is this phrase being used here? And to which jurisdiction does this action pertain? Hmm?

What you have in fact uncovered is more proof of what I have said all along, though not the specific alteration being referenced by me. In the jurisdiction of the air (commerce) they began using the "United States" name at the same time that "The United States of America" was formed in the international jurisdiction (trade). This is the other half of the same action. They were trying to keep commercial accounts separate from international trade accounts.

You are just too inexperienced to read the tea leaves, but that doesn't stop you from shooting off your Big Fat Mouth.

If you don't care enough to learn these things and learn where to look for the evidence (obviously not in Municipal Government records) --- go back and suck up all the political rot and believe in that and be satisfied with your life as a slave.

Anna von Reitz
3 hrs ·

A Reply for "No One" ---- The Proof is in the Pudding.

What is, is.

Donald Trump is unique in my experience of Presidents--- and that now goes back sixty years --- in that he has kept or made very good faith effort to keep every single one of his campaign promises.
That is not the modus operandi of a "rat". That is evidence of an honorable man.

The modus operandi of a "rat" is clearly demonstrated by Barack Obama ---- "you can keep your health insurance" --- uh-huh and "I'm going to cut the federal budget" ---- after I inflate it by $12 trillion more in debt.......
THAT is a rat.

But a man who keeps his campaign promises? No, that is something different. Something really, really different.
So, based on The Pudding Test, Donald Trump gets high marks.
And I will stick with that until proven otherwise.

As for "Q" --- there has to be something in play and in a major way, or we would be at war by now. In fact, if Hillary had won, we'd all probably be in cattle cars by now.

Call it what you will -- "Q", the Plan, the White Hats, or the Good Angels. Whatever. All those federal indictments didn't just come out of nowhere, you know. So, there again, while I am waiting like everyone else for actual arrests of the criminals, the paperwork alone that went into that process is proof that "something major is going on".

And if it is what "Q" says, I am all on board with that, because it is a matter of criminality and not a matter of politics or economics or race or religion or anything else. It's all just ugly old garden-variety bunko and other forms of crime being practiced on a vast scale. So, yes, I agree with "Q" ---- it's a police matter.

With an estimated two (2) million felons at large in this country, it's more a matter of which variety of felon do you go after first?
For any competent and motivated police force, it's a "target rich environment".

And the next question is --- where do you put all these felons?
Look what happened to Jeffrey Epstein. Even if you find space for them, how do you keep the key contributors to the crime spree alive long enough to testify?

All that money put into Gitmo makes sense now, doesn't it?

And where do you find justices/judges competent to hold that many extra trials? A great many trial lawyers have to be trained to actually conduct admiralty courts, or, the normal caseloads of existing courts must be drastically reduced.

If I were a betting woman, I'd bet that there will be efforts to clear out jails by releasing and commuting the sentences of Americans who have been jailed illegally for regulatory infractions.

The impetus for that is two-fold: (1) we told the Pope and the Queen that we aren't paying for the cost of incarcerating those Americans, and (2) they need the jail space.

Again, if I were a betting woman, I would guess that they are waiting for the last shoe to drop in the Municipal bankruptcy that started under Obummer.

And then, technically, there won't be a Municipal Government left to protect the rats. They will all have to seek different cover.

Some members of Congress already have their Dual Citizenship set up to seek protection in other countries that don't have extradition treaties with us. Others will try to adopt back their American State National status ---- which is what Bill and Hillary have hidden behind for decades, but which will not be so foolproof now that our Government is operational again. We will be able to arrest them even if Mr. Trump can't.

Finally, if you were Donald Trump and you had around two million active felons at large, including the bulk of the Municipal Congress, which group of them would you focus your attention on taking down first?

He has chosen the pedophiles, and in my opinion, he has chosen wisely.

Why? Because they are universally detested as cowards and perverts, and that is well-earned; but, more importantly, because they prey upon the most vulnerable among us. As an extra reason to go after them first ---- the pedophiles span the whole spectrum of activities engaged in by all the other criminals and are often kingpins in additional crime syndicate activities.

That is, you can nail them for pedophilia and other gross moral crimes, and at the same time, take them out of their snuggled-up positions in banking and securities administration, government finance, records administration, Congress, the military, State of State administration, Court System.... all across the board.

I think Mr. Trump is doing a great job honoring his promises and taking out the worst of the worst of them in an orderly, non-destructive fashion. Godspeed and go for it.

But, one must remember --- Mr. Trump can only do what the parameters of his offices allow him to do. He cannot single-handed restore our lawful government "for" us.

The responsibility of self-governance remains our responsibility, and the authority of the land and soil jurisdiction can only be exercised by Americans claiming their unique birthright State National political status and then choosing as adults to act as State Citizens, operating their State of the Union.

Otherwise, we continue to operate a 12 cylinder engine on eight, and we continue to be at the mercy of the Pope and the Queen and whatever minions they have staffing their Territorial and Municipal Government structures.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

For the State Assemblies and New Readers

1. We have Admiralty/Maritime Courts operating in an improper way in this country because our own American Courts are --for the most part-- not operating.

This situation arose as a result of the Civil War. The solution for it has been on the books ever since.

Milligan Ex Parte provides that when our civilian courts are operational, their military and commercial courts must be withdrawn and transitioned back to their proper limitations.

So, while I appreciate the fact that many of you have problems with both the Territorial and Municipal Court Systems, and understand that you are being improperly "addressed" as Territorial or Municipal Franchisees, it's up to all of us to do something truly effective to end this situation on a permanent basis.

And that is?
Declare our proper political status as American State Nationals, and, as adults, step forward to engage in self-governance as American State Citizens.

Having the "right" to self-govern is not the same thing as doing the work of self-governance and thereby exercising that right.

Having corrected our own political status records and having formed our State Assembly, we are in position to begin the whole endeavor set before us ---- and to organize our own land and soil jurisdiction Courts to serve the People/people of our States and Counties.

Once our courts are up and operational, their foreign courts by prior agreement established by Milligan Ex Parte, must withdraw and stop presuming upon us and misaddressing us.

So, now you know all these troubles with their courts---foreign taxation, child theft, licensing, foreign "titles" and "descriptions" placed on your land, foreign mortgages and foreclosures, funny money banking, securitization of living flesh resulting in enslavement and peonage--- all these evils can be stopped simply by you and your neighbors declaring your proper political status and filling your jury pools and electing your court officers.

What's stopping you? You are members of a separate population and you exist in a separate jurisdiction and you are responsible for your own self-governance, which includes operating courts for your own people.

Step up. Let your feet be fleet.
If you are having trouble explaining this situation and garnering enough support from other Americans to assist you and join your State Assemblies, you aren't explaining freedom well enough.

2. Each FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE issued by THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a foreign fiat currency, not actual money, being issued as an I.O.U. and as a military script by a foreign corporation.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is not The United States of America.

For the Newbies--- any time you see anything named using all capital letters, you are looking at one of two things: (1) a dead man's estate, or (2) a commercial corporation, and in either event, you are not looking at The United States of America [Unincorporated] --- which is the Proper Name of our Country and our Federation of States operating in international jurisdiction.

The potential collapse of this or any related foreign currency as a result of foreign counterfeiting and other criminal acts has nothing to do with us and emphatically does not mean that our country or our people are "bankrupt".

Far from it. American State Nationals and American State Citizens are the Priority Creditors of these organizations, commercial corporations, and the foreign governments supporting them.

So, again, give your friends and neighbors the benefit of an education in the value of being an American versus being a "US" citizen.

You can claim your true birthright political status and receive back all that is owed to you, including your State property assets, free and clear, or you can stupidly and stubbornly insist that you are "US citizens" of some kind or another, and be caught with your pants down.

So. Do you want your land, your gold, your silver, and your National Credit returned to your possession, free of debt and encumbrance?
Choice One.
Or do you want to be saddled with "infinite debt" that is actually owed by criminals --- but to be paid for by you and your children for generations to come? Choice Two.

Again, if you are having any trouble explaining this to your friends, neighbors, and countrymen, you're not trying hard enough.
These are not trick questions.

As an American State National or American State Citizen, you are the heirs and landlords and sovereigns in your own right.

As a "US" Citizen --- either a British Territorial United States Citizen or a Municipal "citizen of the United States" you are a servant and a debtor without recourse.

In fact, as a "US" Citizen [that is, a Federal Employee or Dependent] of either stripe, your only hope is that other Americans will step forward and reclaim your State for you, thereby preserving your inheritance free and clear of debt, for the day when you, too, can "come home" again.

3. Once you have your State Assemblies properly populated you are in position to begin issuing instructions to the State of State Legislatures and the Congressional Delegation.

You don't like being mis-addressed? You want the bogus tax bills to stop? You want the Post Office to operate properly? You want a foreclosure moratorium in your State? You want Child Protective Services to actually protect children?

Well, there's nobody but you to tell your public servants what you want done. And once you do, they are actually obligated (by their paychecks and pensions) to do what you tell them to do. Note the Emoluments Clause.

I can't do it for you. Mr. Trump can't do it for you.
Self-governance begins with you, your decision to take responsibility for your own life.

From that decision comes the decision to take responsibility for your own government, both at the county level and the State level.
From that decision comes the determination to take responsibility for the proper operation of the Federal Government, too.
Americans in charge of America.
What a concept!

And again, if you are having trouble garnering the understanding and support of other Americans and trouble filling the ranks of your State Assemblies, it is high time that you reviewed points 1, 2, and 3 with them.

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

My Beef -- Military, Get a Clue: 30 November 2019

Some persons have attempted to paint me with an "anti-military" brush, and also with an "anti-civil service" brush, but generally speaking, that is not at all true. I am, in fact, holding the line and fighting the fight for our military and our veterans along with everyone else.

My beef is with the Pope, with Her Britannic Majesty, and with scads of high level politicians and administrative ne'er do wells, who have happily enriched themselves in gross Breach of Trust, and far too often, have enriched themselves via spilling blood. That blood is ours, whatever job description.

They have followed up by cheating the actual military out of the services and pensions they have earned at such a cost. And that is what they are intent upon, again, as part of their Grand Slam Plan right now: collapse all the Pension Funds, let the stock market crash, stand back and reap the "benefits" by being able to buy up companies like GE and 3M and Bayer and Mitsubishi and Sanyo at pennies on the dollar, using our gold and silver to do it.

Who cares that the military pensions and services will also be "discharged" in this hideously unfair and dishonorable manner?

I do, so I guess I am not the Enemy of the military, am I?

I am one of those who wishes to scuttle the rats and force the corporations to pay up, instead of sitting on my thumbs and letting the actual living people suffer.

The US NAVY is a foreign, for-profit Municipal Corporation. It is staffed by Federal Civil Service Employees working for the Municipal DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, also known as "the" DOD. Most of these people are "retired" United States military personnel and many of them don't have a clue that they are doing anything wrong.

Thanks to all the "similar names deceits" that go on, some people have mistaken this entity, the US NAVY, for the United States Navy, which is another animal entirely.

Let's make it clear: the DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and the US NAVY are both corporations. Giant commercial corporations. Both operate under the auspices of "the" Municipal United States Government. And both have been known to go completely bonkers and operate as crime syndicates, especially under the influence of quasi-military Agencies like the CIA.

These are the entities that spend their days cashiering away the American National Credit owed to the American States and People, and pretending that we are "absent".

These are the entities that, for the most part, have established the morally and legally and lawfully repugnant patents and protected those criminal patents "in the name of" National Security. Never mind which "National Security" they may be concerned about, and the fact that all these miscreant patents are null and void for criminality on the face of them.

Imagine --- self-admitted, blatant, criminal schemes --- being protected by the US Patent and Trademark Office. Everything from mind control to geo-engineering to "systems" designed to lodge false claims to own our DNA, to deliberately conceived "educational programming" designed to undermine our ability to think, to bogus electronic 'trading systems" that bypass the necessity of having any actual interest in physical assets that are supposedly being "traded".

These are all violations in Gross Breach of Trust being practiced against us and the rest of the living people worldwide, by run amok incorporated crime syndicates that have been promoted and protected by the Office of the Roman Pontiff, and since 2011, by the Roman Curia, which is continuing to play Circle the Wagons and Hide N' Seek while they try to protect the Catholic Church on one hand, and move their seat of operations to the United Nations which they propose to use as a storefront, just as they used the Roman Catholic Church for the same deceptive purposes.

Just so we are clear, all the "governments" represented in the United Nations are private, for-profit corporations in the business of providing "government services"---- not actual national governments at all.

Let us further be clear that the majority ownership and administrative control of all those corporations is held by the UN Corporation, a nasty old Vichy French Nazi-collaborator formed during the Second World War, two years prior to the United Nations Organization being chartered, and which functions in the same way as the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia once did ----- as a Comptroller Umbrella Corporation owning the majority interest in all these individual governmental services corporations.

So with the Roman Pontiff (or whatever they are going to call "him" now) holding the majority interest in these "national government" corporations, whatever they do is only what the UN Corporation tells them to do, and the UN Corporation does whatever the Roman Curia tells it to do--because they hold its charter "for" the Holy See, and the Roman Curia, in turn, serves Whatever Name or Office for the Prince of Darkness.

So once again, no matter how you cut it, all this deceitful, nasty, double-dealing, all these dishonest and immoral corporations and their activities, including the issuance of criminal "patents" to the US NAVY---- it all comes back to the Roman Curia and the Roman Municipal Government and ultimately to the Holy See and the Pope.

So don't imagine that I am being mean or critical of Midshipmen and boat Commanders and Captains of Vessels. I am not after Shavetail Lieutenants, Bosun's Mates, or Quartermasters. My quarrel is not with Warrant Officers, Commissary Officers, or Sergeants, Engineers, or anyone else having an honest job and occupation in the Armed Services at all.

My beef begins with corrupt Admirals and Generals and it climbs the food chain from there.

None of this is about honest men and women serving in the United States Navy or any other branch of Military Service in any rank. It's about rats infesting and manipulating our actual military for no good reason and without any granted authority to do so.

This, among other issues, is about preventing the criminals from foisting their debts off onto our actual military personnel and civil servants and preventing these foreign governments from evading the payment of the pensions and services that our military and federal civil service members are owed.

This isn't just about American State Nationals or American State Citizens. It's about what our Federal Employees are owed, along with all the rest of us, too.

But bear in mind, it is the "People" of this country, that is the American State Citizens, who hold the other end of the constitutional agreements, and we --- those of us who adopt and hold this political status --- are the only ones that can hold the thieves accountable.

So instead of telling lies about me and about our State Assemblies, and trying to cobble together individual "deals" to save yourselves at everyone else's expense, or trying to front fake "State Assemblies" composed of US citizens --- get a clue.

This game of Musical Chairs has come full circle.

The American State Nationals and the American State Citizens aren't the only ones who got cheated and treated like rubes--- and we aren't the only ones that they have attempted to feed "carrots for jackasses", either. We just happen to be the only ones who can hold the feet of the Queen and the Pope to the fire, and you happen to be our employees, responsible for assisting.

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Understanding States

A couple days ago I wrote an article about the concepts of Land versus Soil and Domicile versus Home and International versus National, and how the whole business of transition from Colonies to (E)states to States occurred in this country.

I also touched on the definition of soil -- the top six inches of dirt -- versus the land, which is everything under that skin of soil on top.
The way all this developed then is that the colonies became independent "landed estates" owned by the people living within their borders.

Perhaps the best way to envision this is a thin outline of your state's geographic shape, six inches thick, that you walk upon and plant crops in--- what we think of as our native soil --- and this soil comprises the National Jurisdiction belonging to you and the rest of the people who have adopted your state as their permanent home.

Your nationality derives from the soil. You are, strictly speaking, a Texan, an Ohioan, a New Yorker, and so on, at birth, and your State is your Nation. Because there are fifty States of the Union, we typically say we are "Americans" when someone asks our nationality, but in terms of actual law, that is not correct. We are Wisconsinites, Californians, Montanans, and Louisianans.... et alia.

Obviously, in addition to soil, your State also has to have land attached to and underlying the soil. This underlying subsurface layer plays by its own rules and is the home of many resources that your state shares with other states--- aquifers, oil reservoirs, mineral deposits and so on, don't respect political boundaries drawn on maps, so it should become clear why the land is an international jurisdiction in much the same way that the sea is an international jurisdiction.

For example, pollution of groundwater that occurs in one State may easily become a problem for one of more other bordering States that share the same underground resource. Such pollution becomes an interstate issue, which in this country means, an international issue.
Please note -- because our soil jurisdiction states are nation-states, the words "interstate" and "international" are synonymous in America.

Over the years, these technical differences between the National soil jurisdiction and the International land jurisdiction, have not been well-understood and are mostly only appreciated by miners and other subsurface resource developers and specialists in law and legal matters who have to deal with the interface between land and soil.

Most of us go our whole lives and when we say, "Minnesota" we automatically think of it as being one contiguous entity and we parrot the phrase "land and soil" without knowing the difference. We just lump these two things together for most purposes, the same way we say we are "Americans" though in fact we are Virginians or Wisconsinites or.....

So, one name, "Minnesota" stands for both the land in International Jurisdiction and the soil in National Jurisdiction, which is attached to and defined by the physical borders of Minnesota. This thing we call "Minnesota" is a physical place with borders, landmarks, land and soil, lakes and running rivers, and thanks to the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Seaway, access to the oceans of the world as well.

All the other land and soil jurisdiction States of the Union have their own unique character, borders, landmarks, land and soil, etc., too.
These States, which are physical and which are geographically defined by borders and landmarks, are not created by any Constitution.

Like the people populating these States, the States of the Union are part of Nature, and to the extent that they exist as named entities, they exist because of State Compacts --- Common Law Covenants, which are agreements established among living people at a given time and which are memorialized and passed on to future generations of Minnesotans, Texans, Californians....

Neither the actual States nor their Federation doing business as The United States of America, owe their existence to any constitution.

It's the States of States that are formed by Constitutions.
As a result, the States and their Federation stand apart from and above and beyond any State of State or Federal Government Subcontractor.

When we are talking about States --- actual, factual States, we are operating under Treaties and Compacts, not Constitutions.

So the Federation of States, The United States of America [Unincorporated], is in a different class and realm than any of the Federal entities --- above and apart from the ruined Confederation of American States of States doing business as the States of America, also above and beyond the British Territorial Government doing business as "the" United States of America, and also above and beyond the Municipal United States Government doing business as "the" United States.

When you talk about the States and The United States of America, you are talking about sovereign unincorporated entities and a Federation of sovereign entities created by Compact and Sovereign Letters Patent, which are obligated by Treaties. Consider them "apples".

When you talk about States of States of any kind, including those chartered by the British Territorial Government and the Municipal United States Government, you are talking about corporations created by charters issued by sovereign entities (our States, the Queen, and the Holy See, respectively), defined by Articles of Incorporation and obligated by Constitutions. Consider them "oranges".

And know this -- the "apples" can do the work of the "oranges". They simply delegated portions of their own work and responsibility to other entities to perform.

I may give AB Lawn Services, Inc., a contract to mow my lawn, but if the corporation in receipt of the contract [described as a constitution] goes bankrupt, or fails to perform the assigned job in good faith and with reasonable competence --- guess what?

I still know how to pour gas into my lawn mower, I can still replace the air filter, and I can still mow my own grass, thank you, very much.
I am not rendered incompetent because of whatever ills befall my subcontractors, and neither is The United States of America rendered bankrupt nor incompetent because of things that happen to or because of its "Federal" subcontractors malfunctioning.

So --- repeat after me: States are apples. States of States are oranges.
States are formed by Compact and Sovereign Letters Patent, and are obligated by Treaties. Apples.

States of States are formed by Charters and Articles of Incorporation, and are obligated by Constitutions. Oranges.

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

The Biggest Lies

I've been sitting here this morning, thinking about lies.
Children lie because they don't know any better, but as you get older, most people stop lying --both to themselves and to others. There are, of course, many exceptions. and many adults continue to lie because they think it profits them in some way.

Bill Clinton: "I did not have sex with that woman."

Those of us who have arrived at the next stage of maturity, know that it does no good to lie, because the Truth, in its entirety, is always known. So, as a practical matter, there is no use in lying. That's why we don't do it.

Barack Obama: "I'm going to cut the Federal budget."
It really is laughable at times, and yet, people who believe lies act upon them.

Think of the millions of people who have voted for politicians to run their lives and ruin their country, simply because they believed lies?
And then failed to check back on voting records and do performance evaluations?

So they continue to believe and vote for the same politicians who have been lying through their teeth the whole time.
US Senator Lisa Murkowski: "Of course, I'm a Republican."

Billions of people worldwide give up over half of their earnings under conditions of force and duress, yet somehow, they believe that they are free.

They pay property taxes and mortgages, yet they think they own their homes.

NIST: "The World Trade Center towers collapsed because of office fires ignited by jet fuel."

Just recently, I was accused of lying.
A neophyte researcher went on the internet and couldn't find something I referenced.
He was looking for an action undertaken by the Continental Congress affecting the International Jurisdiction of the Several States--- in Municipal Government records. No joke.
That's like looking for Acts of Parliament in the archives of the City of Pittsburgh, Ohio.
Even after I explained his mistake, he remained convinced that I'd lied to him.
So, it's not just a matter of being lied to by others, it's also a matter of lying to ourselves --- failing to admit our mistakes and limitations.
How else does his incompetence become my lie?

Pope Francis: "We must obey the UN."
[I just won't mention that I own 'the" UN.]

We discover, much to our amazement, that our two foreign Subcontractors, the Queen and the Pope, have been colluding together to create a perpetual "war" on our soil.

This is amazing on three counts.
First, it's amazing because a shot hasn't been fired in this "war" in a hundred and fifty years, plus, the whole thing was an illegal mercenary conflict and not a war to begin with.

Second, it's amazing because they are our Employees and have no reason or right to be fighting on our soil.

Third, it's amazing because the Queen works for the Pope as his Overseer of the Commonwealths, and the British Territorial Government that is supposed to be one side of this non-existent "war" is a Commonwealth. So the Pope is fighting against the Pope, and both the Pope and the Queen are profiting from this at the expense of their Employers.

I'll admit this is a jaw-dropper, but it is the truth nonetheless.

So, yes, it can be hard to make a distinction between truth and lies, simply because the truth is unbelievable.

Who could believe that the Pope is the one ultimately responsible for all this destruction and criminality? That he is literally causing it to exist?

As he, the Pope, owns all these corporations and controls the charters issued by the Holy See, he could, presumably, pull the plug on the whole shooting match, and end the bogus "war" with the flick of a pen and a whisper in Lizzie's ear.

And what about us? Why are we standing here allowing our EMPLOYEES to cause us trouble?

It is unbelievable. It's also true.
So, what to do in a world where truth can appear to be a lie, and a lie can appear to be the truth?

Perhaps the answer lies in science and mathematics--- the Natural and Universal Laws.

Perhaps, too, there is a reason that this video showed up in my in-box this morning as I was ruminating about lies. It exposes the Biggest Whopper of them all:
https://prepareforchange.net/…/the-biggest-lie-youve-ever-…/

Remember our meditation to break apart the Great Seals that are interfering with the flow of energy on this planet? The Great Palatine Seal in Rome is battered, but still standing. It's time to pull it apart.

Maybe that will finally convince the Pope?
The Seal on Bardsey Island is below the waves, but needs to vanish entirely.

Just imagine untying knots, releasing all the things that bind us, letting go of the past, letting go of selfishness and fear, being truly free and truly honest and truly healthy and truly loved.
Because you are.

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

Schmanking = Criminal Banking

The banks are crooked. All of them. They have no other choice. And THAT is the problem. We have, whether we know it or not, created a criminal banking system and then stood back and let it roll. What kind of results do we expect from that?

A train wreck is what I expect from that, and "transitioning" out of this crooked system is made difficult by the fact that both alternative models, the gold-backed system and the quantum system, are known to be crooked, too.

What bothers me is that the bankers know this and I know this and you should know it if you don't --- but nobody is talking about this fundamental fact.

The Federal Reserve system is a fantasy built on grossly criminal practices requiring impersonation, enslavement, and barratry.

The IMF system is built on a currency commodity rigging scheme -- the "Exchange Stabilization Fund".

The BRICs system is built on manipulation of gold reserves and artificially restricting access to gold --- commodity rigging, again.

The Quantum system is another fantasy built on manipulation of old MS-DOs programming and manipulation of digits, more rigging....

It's all about manipulation of "perceived values" of symbols and artificially controlling access to commodities. It's all crooked. And if you think about it more than five minutes, it's also crazy.

It's idolatry. Just like people used to carve statues and worship the "image of God" they had themselves created, we create these "symbols of value" ---- coins, pieces of paper, etc. --- and give them value based on our belief that they have value.

Years ago I waved a dollar bill at a friend who was staring at me like I was nuts.
I said to him, "Look at this! What is it? It's a piece of paper! And it's not even a useful piece of paper. It's printed all over, so not good to write on. It's too stiff and hard-surfaced to use for toilet paper. What in the hell do you think this is? What gives it any "value" if not your pig-headed belief that it HAS value?"
Well?

And it is the same thing with a gold coin. Sure, gold is a metal, so relatively speaking, more valuable than paper. It's even a fairly rare metal with some special properties as metal, which increases its value for some industrial applications. But, when you get right down to it, what good is it to you? Can you eat it? Wear it? Will it keep you warm or fuel your car?

And if you don't use gold or silver, what other commodities are you going to arbitrarily pick? Blueberry jam? Seltzer water?

You see, this whole system of thinking and doing things is crazy, so instead of arguing over which idiot-system we are going to use, let's stop being idiots.

There is only one (1) and exactly one (1) honest form of money possible.

And that is money based on the value of all traded commodities and all labor, worldwide.

A currency based on all traded commodities and all labor immediately guts the motivation for rigging commodities and buffers everyone against losses. It also puts a curb on "futures trading" --- because every country is a producer of "currency standard goods", and so, at least potentially, is every individual.

So, we could have honest money, free trade, and global harmony for the cost of issuing a currency based on the total value of traded goods and labor, worldwide. It could be issued by one international Think Tank and all the various countries could take turns sending their own oversight teams to make sure nobody was fudging anything. That takes care of the fear that there would be one bank controlled by one set of all powerful bureaucrats.

Along with this, strict and permanent accords would have to be adopted guaranteeing every living man and woman the absolute right to engage in trade and to use this global currency without restriction or fear of losing access to it and the transfer systems related to it.

Our money would stand for the labor, both skilled and unskilled, of workers in China as well as Belize, Germany, and all the other countries of the world. It would stand for all the commodities traded on every stock exchange worldwide.

So a gain in the value of skilled labor in Bangladesh would increase the value of the money worldwide, and a new forest planted in Brazil would increase the value of the money worldwide.

In this way, the monetary system would encourage everyone to do better and to help each other. It would also encourage every government on Earth to be diligent in guarding against counterfeiting and hoarding and other evils, because they would know that it was their money being victimized by these practices, along with everyone else's.

Ah, but what about the Eternal Problem? How to pay for the disabled, the sick, the elderly, the infants--- all those who, for one reason or another, are not able to pull their weight?

We simply value them more, and in our new banking system, we give them extra tokens.

Life itself is infinitely valuable, beyond price.

So we need to stop focusing on the comparatively petty issue of how do we feed the poor and infirm--- and start focusing on the much larger issue of properly valuing life and thereby valuing our brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers, friends and neighbors, the dogs at our feet and the trees lining our streets.

After all, everything that we trade and everything that we earn from work and services, is all predicated on being alive and having needs and desires as living people. Most of us are both producers and consumers, but those who are only able to consume are vitally important as well.

It is the consumers who give meaning and value to what the producers produce, whether it is goods or services.

Consumers are the ultimate source of "perceived value" in any such system.

Put another way, it's my hunger that makes your hot dog valuable in the first place.

If we remember these simple facts when we create economic service systems--- and that is all that banking and insurance and stock and bond markets are--- and properly value consumers for what they contribute, then everything falls back into balance. Both the yin and the yang have their due.

From that perspective, it then becomes possible for people to see that all of this, whether honest or crooked in its factual operation, is arbitrary.

It's a game. We are keeping tally and nobody really knows why. That simple act of keeping track of what goes into the system and what comes out of the system and into "your" account and "my" account, is what creates the illusion of limitation, separation, and value.
Accounting makes rich men rich and poor men poor.
Accounting is the mechanism of enslavement, just as law is the instrument of condemnation.

So we need to ask ourselves --- what are we accounting for? Why?
Perhaps it might make sense if the purpose of accounting was to make sure that everyone gets a fair share, or to make sure that something pencils out in terms of effort going into it versus benefit coming out of it, but instead, the main purpose of accounting in the modern world is to keep track of digits and shunt them here and there, to keep a tally of symbols---signifying what? Non-existent piles of silver? Hours that nobody ever worked?

This might be harmless enough in a theoretical world, but our actual experience tells us that it is harmful, because people forget it is a game and charlatans make false claims in commerce based on these tallymarks. They take actual homes and farms and factories "in return for" --well, nothing at all.

Yes, I will give you credit for reading this, because most people can't bear to think about these things --- and I will note that there is no big difference between me "giving you credit" for reading this and any bank giving you credit for filling out a loan application, pledging your assets to them, so that they have credit to loan you.

You finally see how stupid this is? How important it is to know what you are valuing? And how that value is accounted for?

Value, like beauty, is actually in the eye of the beholder. It doesn't exist external to the relationship between individual Producers and individual Consumers. So focus the economic services industry on the relationship between Consumer and Producer, and properly value the Consumers.

The simpler, more mindful, more direct, and more honest we can make the interface between Consumers and Producers on a worldwide basis, the better. Instead of quibbling about what physical material we use to make tokens ---our little Tiki gods made of gold, plastic, paper or what-have-you-- or what form the tokens take, our attention should be on what we value and why we value it and how we account for it.

The more abundant and the more widely dispersed the tokens are, whatever we use as tokens, the better. We don't need to be coy or chintzy about our reasons for distributing tokens, either, so as to make them seem more valuable by being scarce. We can freely give every man, woman, and child on this planet more than enough tokens to live and live well, which should be the goal of any sane economic system.

And then, we need to ask ourselves a lot of disturbing questions like: do we really need ten Barbie dolls? Do we need to eat meat every night of the week? What impacts do our consumer choices have on the planet? The plants, the animals, and other people? Do we need to make other choices and value other things? Or value different things more?

Maybe love and health should hit the scales and weigh in as being "valuable"?

These are the worthy questions, and the answers we give can change the world.

It really doesn't matter whether we use gold, paper, plastic, or digits as a "medium of trade". Whatever tokens we use to represent value, they remain tokens, in the same way that a statue representing a saint remains a statue.

So let's re-focus our thinking and the worldwide debate about banks and "money" and currencies, and most of all about "value" --- and let's squarely face such questions as, "Can value be stored?"

I, for one, don't believe that value can be stored in a gold coin like storing electrons in a car battery; rather, I see that some delusions are more durable than others. People more readily believe that gold has value, so according to their belief, it does.

But that's like saying I believe in ghosts, so I am more scared when I hear something go bump in the night.

It's not a reflection of the value of gold. It's a reflection of people's long term belief in the value of gold.

Let's ask--- what is our standard for assigning "value" to a cord of wood, or an hour of time?

Let's ask why your hour as a brain surgeon is so much more valuable than my hour cleaning ten toilets?

Most of all, let's ask who all this really belongs to --- because to be honest, none of us created any of what we are trading.
Even our ability to walk around and think and perform work is being constantly created for us by powers we don't begin to comprehend.

So, in the final analysis, what are we doing, but indulging in an adult game of "Pretend"?

Let's look at what we are doing, why we are doing it, and how we are doing it. And then answer the real question that we are being asked by the entire Universe: what do you want? Do you want things to be like this?

And if not, let's change it.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

About Us Working With Karen Hudes

Karen Hudes is a flak for the World Bank— but this statement requires analysis of what the “World Bank” is. It’s a bank of banks, controlled by bankers from all over the world.

So what happens when the World Bank does things that endanger or offend the member banks?

If things get bad enough and the implications liability-wise are clear enough, those member banks that stand to lose the most will need a “whistleblower” to dampen down the improper actions being taken by the World Bank.

The same scenario could develop within the World Bank itself. The Directors could find themselves being outgunned and out-maneuvered by several very powerful member banks —in effect, forced to do immoral or illegal things and left to take the blame for it.

Enter Karen Hudes.
That is the kind of “Whistleblower” she is— not the brave, lonely figure alerting the world to criminal wrong-doing, but the Insider being employed to blow the whistle because internal organizational control mechanisms aren’t working.

You might think of her as the person being paid to pull the emergency brake on a runaway train.

So, she’s certainly not an enemy of the World Bank. She still indirectly works for them and so, last time I looked, does her husband. She was, in fact, taking action to help at least some factions within the World Bank and most likely, her activities stem from the second scenario— that is, most likely she was working for some of the directors of the World Bank to save the World Bank.

My beef with Karen is that she either doesn’t know or chooses not to tell the truth about the American issues. She misrepresents American history and does so in a way that undermines efforts to settle accounts.
And why that is?

She has spent her life in Europe and even many Americans who grew up and stayed in this country for a lifetime don’t know their own history, so it is completely plausible and even likely that she simply doesn’t know that she is misrepresenting what went on here.

It could also be that she knows the history and is — again —- protecting the World Bank.

The World Bank has reasons why it does not want to hear about what it owes Americans.

For starters—
1. We know that FDR collected by his own admission 20,000 tons of privately held American gold. We know that 6,000 tons of that was used to capitalize the Federal Reserve System, and 14,000 tons was used as a bankruptcy guarantee for the other Secondary Creditors—- the World Bank and IBRD (International Bank of Reconstruction and Development).

We know this gold stash was used as a collateral guarantee backing both the World Bank and IBRD as a result. We also know that when the bankruptcy of “the” United States of America, Incorporated was finally settled in November of 1999— that gold was not returned to the Americans.

World Bank and IBRD claimed it as “abandoned assets” —-and made no attempt to contact us and return the assets to the lawful heirs—- the living people of this country.

I have a problem with that.

It’s bad enough that they had the free use of our assets as collateral for 66 years without our consent and even worse that FDR stole our assets at gunpoint in the first place—- which they also had cause to know—- without adding injury to insult by purloining the assets once the bankruptcy was over.

We want the 14,000 tons of American gold returned to the lawful government of this country, to be returned for the direct benefit of the heirs of those it was stolen from.

It’s just simple law and decency. If your Grandmother was forced at gunpoint to “donate” her wedding ring, you’d feel the same way I do. It’s not even the thought of any riches. It’s the thought of justice and property being returned to the lawful heirs and owners.

Second Bone to Pick—-
Upward of $21 trillion dollars worth of credit owed to Americans is also owed by the banks —and the World Bank and its members certainly have cause to know this.

The “system” adopted in 1913 and completely implemented in 1934 is a debt-credit system using a private military script I.O.U. known as the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE — FRN’s, as currency.

Like any other “Note” this is just a piece of paper promising to pay at some later date.

But to be legal there has to be a redemption date and there is none published on these notes—- why?

Because the debt was transferred to Treasury Bonds that are issued in tranches and paid off on specific dates —to the purported investors, the Federal Reserve Banks.

But are the Federal Reserve Banks the actual investors?

No. They are just a bunch of check kiters, illegal securities brokers, and crooks.

The American States and People are the actual investors— again, at gun point, forced to “invest” by Legal Tender Laws.

So let’s look a little deeper at the actual situation.
They are using debt as legal tender which results in what is known as a debit-credit system.
I give you an I.O.U. and you give me a hamburger.
Have I paid you for the hamburger?
No.
I have promised to pay you back sometime in the future.
In this way the “US National Debt” accumulated, and so also did the American National Credit.
All the Americans who exchanged their actual labor and actual hamburgers for I.O.U.s are owed pre-paid credit for every penny of the US National Debt.
Plus interest.

This is a fact that none of the banks want to face, because they all benefited from using this credit that was in fact owed to us. They purloined it, leveraged it, invested it, cashiered it away so that we couldn’t have any direct benefit from it, and now, they don’t want to admit what they did and return it.

In fact, they can’t return it, but they could make a good faith effort to benefit the people they wronged by carrying through on the promised remedy passed by their Congress back in 1934, and honoring a system of Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Exemption, which the miscreants never actually disclosed to the public or fully implemented.

In a MOCEE system both parties owe each other debts.

In this case, we owe them for government services and they owe us for the goods, services, credit, etc., that they receive from us—- so we simply agree to “offset” our debts.

I owe you $10, you owe me $100, so we agree that henceforth, I owe you nothing and your debt to me is reduced to $90.

If the rats had simply carried through and made this available to the Americans, the US Debt would have been kept in check and never “blossomed” into a $21 trillion dollar behemoth. Plus interest.

Now the “US” Corporations, including the Federal Reserve System, responsible for this theft and embezzlement of pre-paid credit owed to the Americans, applied for and received bankruptcy protection because of the bogus “US National Debt” that should have been offset —but clearly, this was all predicated on fraud and embezzlement of credit owed to us, so that no bankruptcy protection should have been allowed.

Those who benefitted from this theft and who protected the perpetrators—- the Pope and the Queen—- remain on the stick for it, but all the banks worldwide benefitted, so Karen’s buddies at the World Bank are squeezing their knees together, too.

It’s an absolutely staggering amount of pre-paid credit that was extracted from us and the interest owed on it has taken on a life of its own.

The pre-paid American National Credit is the elephant in the downstairs bathroom.

We know that they can never pay us back in actual fact, but they can begin to make amends by doing what they agreed to do in the first place. They need to be authorizing Mutual Offset Credit Exchange Exemptions for all Americans, allowing us to offset all public debts.

In real time that means that we would be able to offset mortgage payments (which are public debt, not private—but that’s another story), college loans, utility payments, and various other bills.

This could be done simply by issuing a special purpose credit card.

In this way, Americans would finally obtain relief and the Perpetrators would finally be paying some of their own bills and nobody would have to go broke over it.

So far, they are trying tooth and nail to obscure and cover up the facts, but both the history and the very nature of a debt-credit system belie them.

They are stuck and they either come to terms to provide relief that is owed, or eventually enough “wolves” will wake up— enough other countries will realize that they have been or are being victimized in exactly the same way, and then all bets are off.

I suspect that this latter fact is what makes the World Bank so nervous.
Growth and profits are good things for corporations—-and that includes banks, but not at the cost of enslaving people you are supposed to serve, and not at the cost of fraud, embezzlement, and all the other crimes involved.

This is just "the credit side' of things. There's more that puts us -- Americans -- at odds with Karen and the World Bank on the actual assets side.

In 1868, the Scottish Government chartered a commercial corporation calling itself "The United States of America, Inc." They then gained access to our credit using this semantic deceit. Their plan and the plan of every other corporation operating in this manner ever since, was simply to charge up our credit cards to the limit, claim bankruptcy protection for themselves, and claim that we were their co-signers --- so as to leave us holding the proverbial bag. Before their planned bankruptcy, however, they did a number of things that have still to be corrected or accounted for.

Most significantly, they bought the Philippine Islands "for" us, using our money to do it, and then, they transported all our physical gold to the Philippines for "safe-keeping" offshore.
Yeah, right.

That original Doppleganger went bankrupt in 1906 and the next Doppleganger, "the" United States of America, Inc. pulled the same basic trick, inflated the currency, ran up the stock market, caused the whole "Roaring Twenties" and Prohibition mark up, went bankrupt in 1933 --- and in 1934, their Board of Directors calling itself a "Congress" passed legislation "creating and independent government for the Philippines".

This created a situation wherein we owned the land of the Philippines lock, stock, and barrel, but now the Philippines had an "independent government" to act as the Trustee for all our gold that was packed off and stored there. This is the connect between Marcos and the Philippines and our gold and President Kennedy and the various agreements that various Presidents made "for" us and that Karen keeps hooting about --- the Bilateral Minefields and Green Hilton and so on.

To put it mildly, all that went on back then by any sane evaluation, is piracy.
And by Maxim of Law, "Possession by Pirates does not change ownership."

Everything that they stashed over there still belongs to us and we have the shipping and docket and flat and box numbers and everything else from those days down to this. We even have their supreme Bank Trustee in our jurisdiction, and are working with him to sort this Mess out.

So, that is stroke Number Three that Karen Hudes and the World Bank don't want to face.

Don't get me wrong. The Americans don't own all the gold that is cashiered in the Philippines and Indonesia. We do, however, own a very goodly part of it, and we own it outright. Our gold and silver deposits collateralize many, many, many banks and the loss of that collateral is what ultimately terrifies the banks.

As with so many other bunko schemes they changed the meaning of "Depositor" to allow themselves to seize deposits left in their keeping, but our deposits were made before those surreptitious changes away from a "normal course of business" ---- so we are unaffected and grandfathered-in.

Karen and her Employers at the World Bank don't know whether to stand up or sit down as a result. Nobody knows what to do, and at the same time, nobody wants to talk to us --- because they are afraid of us. They know how mercilessly we have been cheated and defrauded and they expect no mercy in return.

I can only assume that they judge others by themselves.
However, in the broad scheme of life, it does no good for anyone to seek the destruction of others. That just opens up another avenue for nasty people to profit themselves at everyone else's expense, so no, we are not proposing vengeance. We are proposing a peace and reconciliation process to discharge odious debt and open up credit resources and restore a sane economic system, at the same time that we fully restore our own government--- putting Americans in control of America again.

This should be good news for people worldwide, as it dawns on them that "the US" is not America. It should also be a relief that we are proceeding in a lawful and peaceful manner and not being vengeful.
At the same time, Mr. Trump and the Pope and the Queen, need to talk directly to the actual Creditors and dispense with any pretense that we are anyone or anything but what we are: the American States and People, doing business as The United States of America [Unincorporated].

Obviously, Karen and the World Bank and the community that she represents professionally have tried to avoid these facts and tried to explain them (and us) away, and that is why I have a less-than-high regard for Karen. I see her as someone who is grinding her own wheel and actually protecting interests that have been less than honest and forthcoming both now and in the past.

That doesn't mean that they can't change, and it doesn't mean that we won't talk to them in the interests of resolving all these issues. It just means that the facts as we know and observe them don't jive with the story that Karen is selling.

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·

Publishing the Notice Sent to the Alaska Congressional Delegation and Other Parties in April 2016
April 22, 2016

To: Don Young, Lisa Murkowski, and Dan Sullivan
c/o “Alaska Congressional Delegation”
702 Hart Senate Building, Washington, DC 20510
US Certified Receipt: 7006 0810 0003 3541 5755
709 Hart Senate Building, Washington, DC 20510
US Certified Receipt: 7013 3020 0002 1837 0399
2314 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515
US Certified Receipt: 7013 3020 0002 1837 0412

From: Anna Maria Riezinger, Grandmother
I am writing to you today pursuant to my duty to fully inform you.

1. Please be informed that you do not represent me and that I am not your employee. I am in fact your employer and benefactor and am a Beneficiary of the United States Trust which you are all supposed to be administering as Trustees in my behalf; also be informed that ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER and ANNA M. RIEZINGER and all other franchises created or thought to be created and operated under these names owe their allegiance to the land of Wisconsin, are of age, and are voluntarily expatriated from any allegiance, obligation, or association with the corporation doing business as the UNITED STATES and equally expatriated from any allegiance, obligation, or association with the corporation doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

The same is true for JAMES CLINTON BELCHER, JAMES C. BELCHER, ERIC JON BELCHER, ERIC J. BELCHER, HAROLD CARL HEINZE and HAROLD C. HEINZE.

The living Americans who are the respective Holders in Due Course of these given names and the underlying Trade Names formed in Upper and Lower Case and all other derivative names, labels, accounts, assets and vessels in commerce associated with them are American State Nationals owing their singular allegiance to the land of their birth.

This is your Notice of these facts.

2. In April of 1861, Lincoln forced the remaining (Northern States) members of Congress back into Session as Commander-in-Chief under martial law, and this has remained the situation ever since. Despite three public declarations by President Andrew Johnson declaring the land jurisdiction to be at peace, no peace was ever actually declared and no Peace Treaty ending the Civil War has ever been signed, with the result that our nation has remained at constant “war” of one kind or another for 150 years. This has caused incalculable damage to millions of people worldwide and the deaths and deprivations of millions of Americans, too. The blame for this continuing outrage against humanity rests firmly on the shoulders of your predecessors and now upon your shoulders.

Resume operation of the proper civil government owed to us under international treaty or stand revealed before the entire world as a nothing more than a despicable corporate military dictatorship being run by international banks under color of law.

This is your Notice of these facts.

3. June of 1864-- the “acting Congress” passed an Act changing the meaning of "state, States and United States" to mean "the territories and District of Columbia". (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864.)

“US Territories” means “portions of the United States that are not within the limits of any state and have not been admitted as states. Includes all federal installations”—military bases, docks, courthouses, arsenals, etc.

This was never changed, so, all references to “state, States, and United States” in Federal Code that are not otherwise specifically defined, must be construed as “the territories and District of Columbia”.

You must also make a distinction between the meaning of the words used prior to and then after the passage of this 1864 corporate law.

Prior to this, “state, States, and United States” meant what we commonly still believe them to mean--- after 1864 in Federal Code—they generally meant something entirely different and opposed to the popular meaning.

This is your Notice of these facts.

4. In 1871-78 an additional meaning was given to “United States” via a process set in motion by the Act of 1871:

The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419, Congress chartered a Federal Company entitled "United States," a/k/a "US Inc.," a "Commercial Agency" originally designated as "Washington, D.C."

Though the Act of 1871 was repealed, its legislative intent was merely chopped up and subsequently passed via this process:
“An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)) .

As the actual District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, the aim of the Act of 1871 is, as it must be, merely to set up the “United States Corp”.

This process of legislation created a private corporation owned by the actual government of the District of Columbia.

Thus the only government created was that of any private corporation which determines its own administrative rules and structures.......that is, the US Corp dba “UNITED STATES” is not merely the adopted doing business name of an incorporated municipality (District of Columbia)--- it is also the name of a private corporation (District of Columbia Municipal Corporation) that was created by the acting Congress via the Act of 1877 and as amended ever since.

This is confirmed by Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C), which states unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is also the name of a corporation, as just demonstrated from the public records.

This is your Notice of these facts.

5. In 1945, the United States Supreme Court addressed the meaning of “United States” for what it termed the “final time” and offered the following:

“The term "United States" may be used in any one of several senses. (1) It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations. (2) It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States (that is, the territories and District of Columbia) extends, or (3) it may be the collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution.” --- Hooven and Allison Company v. Evatt, 324 US 652 (1945) (This is also the verbatim definition of “United States” given in Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition.)

Thus we have a total of five definitions of “United States” in common use within the federal government– the three given above, the one adopted in 1864, and the one coming out of the Acts of 1871-78.

This is your Notice of these facts.

6. The same duplicitous word-smithing was done with the words “United States of America”— with the same result.

From --- A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier, published 1856:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (First meaning given):
“(1) The name of this country. [That is, the actual land mass.] The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California.”

(Fifth meaning): “(5)—The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property, 1 Marsh, Dec. 177, 181, but it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.”

So, even before the “US, Inc.” there was the “USA, Inc.” and both of these entities are referenced in what follows.

This is your Notice of these facts.

7. Does the UNITED STATES – the private corporation operating the government of “the Territories and District of Columbia” have “citizens”?

1873: U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) "The term resident and citizen of the United States (”United States” meaning “territories and District of Columbia”) is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress." (That is a “citizen of the United States” is a “statutory citizen”—created by legislative action.)

1875 - This definition of "United States" as a Corporation has its own citizens (see United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542) who are generally referred to as United States citizens.

1953 - Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp 383 "A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government…”

1967 - Congressional Record , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646: A "citizen of the United States" is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

Yes, the UNITED STATES Corporation has “citizens”.

This is your Notice of these facts.

8. Can “citizens of the UNITED STATES” be corporations? Yes.
Diversity of citizenship exists when opposing parties in a lawsuit are citizens of different states or a citizen of a foreign country. If the party is a corporation, it is a citizen of the state where it is incorporated or is doing business. If diversity of citizenship exists, it places the case under federal court jurisdiction pursuant to Article III, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.

See above definition of “citizen of the United States” from the 1967 Congressional Record--- “a civilly dead entity defined as a private constructive cestui que trust which “upholds the debt” of both the USA, Inc. and the US, Inc.”

This is your Notice of these facts.

9. What is a cestui que vie trust? It’s a trust formed when the actual owner of property is “unknown, presumed dead, lost to accident, natural disaster, or missing at sea” and the State then seizes control of their property assets and presumes to be the owner and beneficiary of their estate.

So where are all these “missing people” coming from?

From the Bureau of Vital Statistics, which has been busily and fraudulently seizing upon American babies and declaring them civilly dead almost at birth.

This is your Notice of these facts.

10. What has been done here is nothing less than slavery by proxy:

A corporate franchise has been named after each one of us, and then, we have been coerced and deceived into accepting the debts of that franchise via a “similar names” deceit.

Prior to 1933 a Foreign Situs Trust created by the USA, Inc. was named after a living man called “John Frederick Doe” and this Foreign Situs Trust was then also gratuitously named as a Surety for the bankrupt USA, Inc’s debts. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed in fact by this corporation. In 1999 that bankruptcy settled and the American People paid off every penny of it.

Beginning in 1944 the US. Inc. similarly named a Cestui Que Vie Trust after the living man John Frederick Doe and called it “JOHN FREDERICK DOE” and this estate trust was named as the Surety for the US Inc.’s debts and “removed” to Puerto Rico. The actual man named John Frederick Doe was then pursued and forced to pay the debts owed by this corporate franchise, too.

This past year, 2015, President Obama acting as the CEO in charge of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. (the USA, Inc’s latest rendition organized under the laws of the United Nations City-State) announced the creation of a new franchise named after “John Frederick Doe”--- and created a franchise of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility named “JOHN F. DOE” operated under the laws of Puerto Rico.

Meanwhile the living American who is the Holder in Due Course of the given name “John Frederick Doe” and who is in fact the owner and executor of his name and all derivatives thereof associated with him, is being subjected to false charges and racketeering on a scale unique in world history.

All this violence, all this fraud, all this insufferable abuse of our trust and good faith is draped around your necks and is now on public display.

This is your Notice of these facts.

11. What is the “UNITED STATES” with respect to the states of the Union and the People thereof?

It’s a private mostly foreign-owned corporation subject to the Clearfield Doctrine, nothing more or less, and the same applies to the USA, Inc. when doing business on our soil. The same applies to all their various “State” franchises, including the “STATE OF ALASKA” (US, INC.) and “ALASKA” (USA, INC.)

These corporations and their “State” franchises are all being operated as criminal syndicates.

This is your Notice of these facts.

12. Fraud vitiates everything. It destroys all contracts and presumptions. It taints everything it touches. All Americans subjected to this undisclosed process in Breach of Trust and Constitution have been defrauded and mischaracterized and deprived of their lawful status as living people and as American State Nationals. This has been done secretively and under conditions of deceit and non-disclosure so as to facilitate identity and credit theft and the practice of personage and barratry against the victims.

All “consent” obtained by any process under these conditions is null and void ab initio and no excuse of war or emergency may be introduced as no such powers were ever granted under The Constitution for the united States of America. There is no statute of limitations on the crime of fraud and it is recognized as crime in all venues and jurisdictions of law, national and international and global.

This is your Notice of these facts.

13. Such mischaracterization and capitulation of the peaceful and non-combatant American People living on the land of the American States is additionally a war crime, which has been committed against them by the US, Inc. and the USA, Inc. and their respective corporate officers.

This is your Notice of these facts.

14. Such abuse, theft, misrepresentation, unlawful conversion, inland piracy, kidnapping, press-ganging and racketeering is also in deplorable violation of both national and international law and in violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Universal Right of Self-Declaration and numerous other Declarations and Conventions of the United Nations which the United States has agreed to and signed.

This is your Notice of these facts.

15. Is the “United States” a foreign entity with respect to the states of the Union?

We quote The Informer:

“No court is to be charged with the knowledge of foreign laws; but they are well understood to be facts which must, like other facts, be proved before they can be received in a court of justice. [cites omitted] It is equally well settled that the several states of the Union are to be considered as in this respect foreign to each other, and that the courts of one state are not presumed to know, and therefore not bound to take judicial notice of, the laws of another state.”

[Hanley v. Donoghue, 116 U.S. 1, 29 L. Ed. 535]
[6 S.Ct. 242, 244 (1885)]

Another key U.S. Supreme Court authority on this question is the case of In re Merriam's Estate, 36 N.E. 505 (1894). The authors of Corpus Juris Secundum ("CJS"), a legal encyclopedia, relied in part upon this case to arrive at the following conclusion about the "foreign" corporate status of the federal government:

“The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” [citing In re Merriam's Estate, 36 N.E. 505, 141 N.Y. 479, affirmed U.S. v. Perkins, 16 S.Ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 625, 41 L.Ed 287] [19 C.J.S. 883]

Before you get the idea that this meaning of "foreign" is now totally antiquated, consider the current edition of Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, which defines "foreign state" very clearly, as follows:

“The several United States*** are considered "foreign" to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. ... The term "foreign nations," as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of foreign nations should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which the action is brought; and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the sense of that rule.”

And a recent federal statute proves that Congress still refers to the 50 States as "countries". When a State court in Alaska needed a federal judge to handle a case overload, Congress amended Title 28 to make that possible. In its reference to the 50 States, the statute is titled the "Assignment of Judges to courts of the freely associated compact states". Then, Congress refers to these freely associated compact states as "countries":

(b) The Congress consents to the acceptance and retention by any judge so authorized of reimbursement from the countries referred to in subsection (a) .... [!!!]
[28 U.S.C. 297, 11/19/88]” -- End quote.

Each one of the sovereign states of the Union is in fact its own nation having its own distinct character, local law, and government apart from any franchises owned and operated under color of law by either the US, Inc. or the USA, Inc. offering to pose as the lawful government of the people, for the people and by the people of these United States.

This is your Notice of these facts.

16. Was it ever the intent of the Founders of this Country that any Congress operating in any capacity whatsoever would ever be granted any right of despotism over the People via any means, mechanism, or pretense?

The Preamble of the actual Constitution which is a trust indenture forever obligating the government of the United States however that government is defined gives the answer, which was further elucidated by the Bill of Rights.

As all the foregoing demonstrates you are each and collectively in Breach of Trust and in Commercial and Administrative Default with respect to your presumed Public Offices and are operating as the administrators of an international crime syndicate with respect to the people and states of the Union you are hired to protect and which you have freely claimed to “represent”.

This is your Notice of these facts.

17. The seedbed of these crimes against Americans has been the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which has been used as a staging ground for these heinous activities by the British Crown and its operatives, and the United Nations Corporation (UN Corp) –not to be confused with the United Nations--- which has sought by various means of similar fraud and force to impose its administration upon us and all other sovereign nations.

This is your Notice of these facts.

18. We have informed the Secretary General of the United Nations and the United States Secretary of State and the Joint Chiefs of Staff and hereby give Notice to the United States Congress that these acts of virulent crime against the American people and the states of the Union and all claims and presumptions based upon them must come to an immediate and permanent stop.

Full disclosure and remedy must be provided to all natural-born American State Nationals and all their vessels in commerce must receive full cure and maintenance without further obfuscation, avoidance, or delay.

The operations of the Trustees of the insolvent UNITED STATES, INC. and the administrators of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. must be brought under control and forced to comply with both national and international law. If President Obama objects, he must be impeached without further excuse or delay.

This is your Notice of these facts.

18. Any officer corporate or otherwise of the United States or its government however defined who fails to take immediate and forceful action to correct and remedy these practices and issues in favor of the American people and the states of the Union shall be in full admission of treason against the same.

This is your Notice of these facts.

19. Any officer corporate or otherwise of the United States of America or its government however defined who fails to take immediate and forceful action to correct and remedy these practices and issues in favor of the American people and the states of the Union shall be in full admission of treason against the same.

This is your Notice of these facts.

20. Operatives of the British Crown and UN Corporation staged initially in Puerto Rico and now operating out of Florida are implementing a propaganda campaign against the peaceful non-combatant people of the states of the Union and again mischaracterizing them as “sovereign citizens”.

This is an oxymoron demonstrating the complete ignorance of those applying such a label to American State Nationals. It is not possible to be or to act as a “sovereign” and at the same time to be or to act as a “citizen”.

The apparent motive for this PR campaign is to excuse the taking of violent action against the American people and against their states of the Union and to provoke an armed insurrection which would then give these same corporate crime syndicates a plausible excuse for killing their creditors.

This is precisely what happened in Nazi Germany and it is threatening to happen here and now.

Any attempt on the part of the Trustees of the bankrupt and insolvent UNITED STATES or on the part of the operators of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to provoke such a contest or make such false claims against their creditors will be instantly and internationally recognized for the specious and self-interested crime that it is.

This is your Notice of these facts.

21. As the “United States Congress” is uniquely and specifically responsible for the administration and indeed, the misadministration, of the Territories and the District of Columbia, it is incumbent upon each one of you to put an end to the international crimes being perpetuated by and within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico against the people of the United States and to put an end to the efforts of the British Crown and UN Corporation to further parasitize and mischaracterize and misrepresent us. Failure to do so will have permanent and extremely unpleasant results for all parties engaged in this international crime spree.

This is your Notice of these facts.

22. “The free, sovereign and independent people of the United States” –quote the Definitive Treaty of Peace, 1783, are still alive and well and competent to act in their own behalf and in behalf of their sovereign nation-states.

We have kept our part of the constitutional bargain and paid for the services we agreed to receive and also a great many “services” that we did not agree to receive and for which we do not owe. We have loyally stood by the British and French Governments through two World Wars, and this present miasma is the thanks we have received for our support.

The mechanism and implementation of these commercial frauds and personage practices against the unsuspecting people and organic states of the Union was provided by the British Government and by undeclared foreign agents, especially by members of the American Bar Association acting in violation of the 1947 Bar Association Treaty.

The presumptions being exercised against us by the so-called “governments” of these corporations dba UNITED STATES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA have become intolerable and we find the constitutional contract has been Dishonored by those entrusted to act as our fiduciary Deputies, Trustees, and Administrators.

An immediate cessation of all hostile actions and presumptions against the people and the states of the Union and an immediate declaration of peace formally ending the Civil War and all other “wars” is called for. Any failure to provide this and all other appropriate remedies will result in the liquidation of the offending corporations via arbitration.

We created the “United States” and the “United States of America” by our sovereign Will and as the creators we are uniquely endowed to take against the Will and to amend the Will and to destroy the Will if we so desire. By the misadministration, duplicity, dishonor, and dishonesty of your predecessors we have not been served; any continuance of these false claims and practices against American State Nationals and the states of the Union will not be tolerated and will be subject to international prosecution as virulent crimes amounting to identity theft, credit theft, press-ganging and inland piracy against these United States and the people of the United States.

This is your Notice of these facts.

23. All prosecutions against birthright Americans under the false pretense that they have agreed via any undisclosed or implied contract to act as “citizens of the United States” or agreed to cede their estates, assets, names or any other property naturally belonging to them to the UNITED STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA are acts of international fraud and inland piracy and are subject to the death penalty for anyone caught intentionally and knowingly participating in or enforcing such crimes under color of law.

The execution of foreign pirates caught in the act may be summarily carried out under Citizens Arrest or by any lawfully elected Sheriff or any duly appointed Federal Marshall under the Public and Organic Law of this nation.

This is your Notice of these facts.

24. All birthright American State Nationals presently accused of any white collar, statutory, or victimless crime being held under false pretenses as “citizens of the United States” must be given full disclosure and released without further delay.

This is your Notice of these facts.

25. All property and rights and material interests naturally and lawfully belonging to birthright American State Nationals must be promptly returned to them and returned to the land recording districts of these United States and to the administration of the actual organic states and people, together with all escrow accounts, interest, tithes, and fees owed to them.

We suggest that the administration of THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE be properly informed and pressed into service to discharge all outstanding debts owed by the fraudulently established individual UNITED STATES franchises operated under the given NAMES of American State Nationals and obliged to deliver all copyrights, trademarks, titles, deeds, credit and other assets owed to and naturally belonging to the people of these United States without further obfuscation or delay.

This is your Notice of these facts.

26. In the interests of national and international peace and decency you are being “requested and required” to do the job that the trusting American people elected you to do in good faith as Trustees and fiduciary Deputies. Failure to do so will be your individual and personal admission of willful treason against these United States and against the people of these United States.

No further excuses or word games are acceptable. The officers of the British Crown among the Delegates either act with Honor and fulfill their obligations owed to these United States and to the people thereof, or they shall be recognized as pirates subject to the penalties of both our Public Law and the international Law of Admiralty.

This is your Notice of these facts.

27. We wish to draw your attention to the ravages and rampages taking place in the so-called western compact States and the atrocities being willfully committed against American State Nationals and their private property interests in those states by agencies of the UNITED STATES.

An innocent rancher named Robert LaVoy Finicum has been waylaid and murdered by men receiving their paychecks on our dole as agents of a corporation merely doing business as the “GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES” and its subsidiaries including the “BLM” and the “FBI”. These federal agents have acted as criminals and under false presumptions on our soil.

We call for their immediate arrest and re-education.

Any continuance of this violent racketeering is completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

However Congress has seen fit to organize its administration of the “territories and District of Columbia” its agencies clearly have no right whatsoever to attack, commandeer, address, or otherwise infringe upon the people of this country.

Similarly, American State Nationals including Ammon and Cliven Bundy and other western state ranchers have been mischaracterized as “citizens of the United States” while in fact being people of these United States.

We are not amused by the convenient and apparent acts of personage and barratry --- crimes under both national and international law--- which are being promoted by the Trustees of the UNITED STATES and the misnamed DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (INC) in their attempts to collect on odious debts owed in fact by their own corporation(s).

What is being attempted is clearly a Reverse Trust Fraud Scheme in which the Trustees of our nation are attempting to act as the Beneficiaries and are mischaracterizing the actual Beneficiaries of the United States Trust as the Trustees of a foreign trust we never consensually agreed to participate in and to which we have no natural affiliation at all---the Public Charitable Trust set up to provide welfare to displaced Negro plantation slaves in the wake of the Civil War.

We suggest that the Congress release the western state ranchers and honor its obligations and redirect its erring employees and inform the creditors of the UNITED STATES of the actual status of these affairs without any further argument or delay.

It may result in embarrassment, inconvenience, and considerable international negotiation to resolve, but all the governments of the world are in one way or another in similar condition and the International Year of Jubilee provides an excellent opportunity for these festering wounds and causes of criminality to be recognized and healed without further bloodshed, violence, or crime.

This is your Notice of these facts.

28. The Congress which is responsible for the operations of the “government of the United States”--- that is, the US, Inc. acting as the government of the “territories and District of Columbia” ---and the various Presidents have committed a great many sins against the people of our nation and their organic states of the Union, including but not limited to all the items addressed in this Notice.

Beginning in 1933 the members of Congress have conspired with the Office of the President and the Governors of Federal State franchises of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA to embezzle from and defraud the American people.

This was done primarily by legislative actions taken under color of law, including the Emergency Banking Acts, the Trading With The Enemy Act, and much more.

As part of the historical fraud upon the people, the US, Inc. and the USA, Inc. colluded to set up a fiat currency to be exchanged on a “dollar for dollar” basis--- a worthless Promissory Note issued by a cartel of international banks doing business as the “Federal Reserve” while in fact having no association with our lawful government---in exchange for an American Silver Dollar. This amounted to the exchange of a piece of paper backed by the good faith of criminals for an ounce of fine silver.

As you all have cause to know, the Federal Reserve bankrupted the old Federal Reserve System and skipped town owing these United States and the people of these United States trillions of dollars worth of gold and silver.

The Federal Reserve’s most recent iteration now proposes to use our labor and our assets to back more “Notes”---- and repeat the same scam, only owing to the fact that they have already embezzled our precious metals, they now wish to up the ante and more overtly control and enslave us.

This is your Notice that we are not now and never were chattels, slaves, livestock, nor corporate franchises of the UNITED STATES nor of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA nor any other fictitious entity you care to name and we are not subject to your statutory rule except by fraud, personage, barratry and criminal mercenary force.

Put another way--the United States belongs to us. We do not belong to it. We are the Priority Creditors, first, last, and always. Any further attack, embezzlement, misrepresentation, collusion of banks, false claims, or legal chicanery undertaken against us or our interests will be recognized as an Act of War against innocent Third Party non-combatants and you will be held individually and personally and commercially 100% liable.

If this is not apparent to you, you should immediately step down from any office or pretension of office related to us or our lawful government in any way.

This is your Notice of these facts.

29. In full view of the national identity and credit theft which has been engineered jointly by the UNITED STATES and USA against the people of these United States and the states of the Union, the present members of Congress must either abdicate and make way for new and more competent deputies elected directly and by paper ballot by the people of these United States or do the right thing and clean up this mess once and for all.

International criminal prosecution of the Federal Reserve and the IMF and all the colluding banking institutions including the World Bank and IBRD which received American gold and silver assets as their payoff for the 1933 fraud is necessary. As already noted, fraud has no statute of limitation and is a crime across all jurisdictions and venues of law worldwide.

Immediate confiscation of the assets of these banks and the assets of shareholders and subsidiaries of these banks is appropriate and necessary for our national security---and as you should now be aware, if our national security goes, so does that of the “territories and District of Columbia”.

Proper administration and discipline of the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the HOUSE OVERSIGHT SUBCOMMITTEE, and the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES would be another start in the right direction. The BLM, FBI, and other “agencies” are here to serve the public, and if not, they are here to be dissolved.

Immediate re-issuance of American Silver Dollars as both our international and your domestic currency is required as a first step toward honest trade.

Disengagement from all Middle Eastern conflicts is demanded and you are advised that no contract to serve in the “US military” is binding as a result of the same fraud and personage scheme herein otherwise described.

Complete immediate cessation of spraying aluminum oxide and other poisonous industrial wastes on our land and on us is demanded without apology.

Complete immediate cessation of the addition of fluoride, another poisonous industrial waste of the aluminum industry to our drinking water, is also demanded without apology.

The closure of most if not all foreign military bases which have been created under the auspices of the US, Inc. and the return of the land and buildings to the host countries needs to be negotiated posthaste.

Our borders need to be sealed and protected and our assets secured against foreign invaders and if they are not promptly defended and honored by you as members of “Congress” you will stand revealed before the entire world as officers of a corporate crime syndicate subject to immediate liquidation.

If President Obama objects to any of this remedial program ordered by the people of these United States and the states of the Union, it is your duty so long as you assume any office related to these United States to impeach him without further delay and remove him from any office having or pretending any authority whatsoever related to us. Notice given to you is notice to your agents and agencies, and notice given to your agents and agencies is notice to you.

Most sincerely and by my hand and under my seal,
by:_______________________________Anna Maria Riezinger, all rights reserved.
c/o Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska
Postal Code Extension 99652

cc:
Ashton Carter
US Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000
via US Certified Mail #7013 3020 0002 1837 0405
Joint Chiefs
9999 Joint Staff
Pentagon
Washington, DC 20318-9999
via US Certified Mail #7013 3020 0002 1837 0429

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon
c/o United Nations Secretariat
New York, NY 10017
via US Certified Mail # 7006 0810 0003 3541 5465

Anna von Reitz
11 hrs ·

Shoes and Justices

Let's call him "Ben" --- a kid in my First Grade class at Black River Falls Elementary School, which was a big, old, rambling nineteenth-century brick building with a spooky Mansard roof structure like something out of the Addams Family movies.

Ben was a strapping boy, tall for his age, with pale skin and dark eyes and dark hair swept over from a side part. I always liked him. He was polite and personable and friendly, but he was poor as the pigeons in the park. His family had eleven children. He was in the middle of the pack. And they and their parents were trying to make a go of it on a hard-scrabble worn out dairy farm somewhere in the back of the back country.

Even with a well-oiled system of hand-me-downs, by the time you hit the fifth or sixth generation, things are worn out. So, there was Ben, and we had all returned to school for the fall semester --- most of us in new school clothes and shoes, but not him. He was wearing a ragged flannel shirt with arms too short, a pair of pants two sizes too big, and a pair of old brown leather dress shoes that looked like they belonged on a grown man. He could barely walk in them, but he was trying.
We were all only six years old, but still, his appearance was arresting --- like a scarecrow or someone playing dress up.

To make matters worse, the whole family was "poor proud" and wouldn't take any help.

So we had to do something, but what?

A Gentle Conspiracy between my Mom, my teacher, and a local merchant took place, in which I played a small part. Our teacher contrived a school lesson about feet and had everyone make an outline of their foot as part of the lesson.

Using this as a guide, my Mom and old Mr. Moe, owner of Moe's Shoe Store, and I --- acting under strict secrecy --- found just the right shoes. They and a shoe care kit appeared in Ben's cubbyhole at school. He couldn't believe his eyes, but he put them on. All that winter, I would see him out in the coat room brushing and shining his shoes. So I asked my Mom if I could have a shoe care kit for Christmas.

She smiled and looked bemused, but agreed. That would be one of my gifts. I made good use of it, too. I polished shoes and oiled boots for everyone in the family.

Years later, when I was in college, I had a roommate from Wayzata, Minnesota, a very upscale neighborhood in Minneapolis. She had never seen anyone polish their own shoes. Well, surprise, surprise, I had been taking care of my boots and shoes, thanks to Ben, ever since I was six years old. And I taught her how, too.

Now, people in the State Assemblies who are grappling with the process of electing Justices of the Peace often ask me how they are supposed to find qualified people to serve their Courts.

Obviously, no Bar Association Members can serve in our courts, thanks to the Titles of Nobility Amendment, and that leaves many people feeling alarmed; they are so indoctrinated into the idea that you have to be a Bar Member to be "legitimate" that they don't know what to think or do.

However, virtually everyone knows The Ten Commandments, and that's what our courts use as our law, with reference to earlier deliberations known as case law, but never being bound by prior precedents.

In our courts, the jury is still king and the Justices of the Peace rule upon the rules of the court and letter of the law, not the facts and law in any particular case. The People decide the facts and the law. So, unlike the Bar Courts, where the Judge is king, in our courts the Justices provide a different function.

In our courts, the Justices assist the juries by answering questions about the rules of evidence and testimony and the meaning of any confusing terms and jargon -- "the letter of the law" --- but from there on, our courts depend on the sense of justice and moral conscience embedded in each juror and also upon each juror's ability to sift through facts and reason their way to reasonable conclusions.

Also, unlike the foreign process, we know our Justices. We don't just vote for a name on a ballot and hope that John G. Finkelmeyer is a good guy because he is recommended by the Bar Association.

So, who do you want as a Justice of the Peace?

First and foremost, a Justice in our courts has to know The Ten Commandments, front and back and sideways. You want someone who is familiar with the Bible, and particularly, with the Old Testament Law which is common to Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.

Our Justices carry the Bible with them when they enter the courtroom. This is the origin of having people stand up when the Justice enters the courtroom --- not out of respect for him, but out of respect for the Bible and the Law it contains.

Second, you need people who are hard-headed enough to bear the cost of rendering justice. It's not an easy job to sit in judgement, but there are times when punishment has to be meted out in order to preserve the peace and safety of innocent individuals, families, and communities.

So preserving peace and safety is the goal of our courts and you need people strong enough to lay the gavel down in behalf of the whole community when it becomes necessary.

You want Justices who have firm common sense and a wide range of practical experience in life---not little tweaky-bird college boys who never learned to shine their own shoes. As a result, most Justices of the Peace are, and will always tend to be, "of a certain age".

Justices need to be smart, hard-headed, logical, and honest ---but they also have to walk the line of moral conscience and have sincere care and respect for people in all conditions of life.

Finally, Justices of the Peace have to have an interest in and familiarity with Due Process, Rules of Evidence, and American Common Law --- which have to be learned like any other subjects.

In about three months of hard study, anyone can learn how to put together and run a competent Common Law Court. My experience with the people of this country suggests that we have thousands of men and women who have by various routes, achieved this basic knowledge, but may need to adjust their viewpoint to exclude additional knowledge they have acquired about admiralty and maritime courts.

In other words, we have no general lack of education about the various forms of law, but there is a common degree of confusion regarding the practices that belong in an American Common Law Court and those foreign practices peculiar to Admiralty and Maritime venues.

Thus, finding competent Justices of the Peace may require candidates to go through a process of "unlearning" as well as learning the principles of our Public Law system---- and for many good candidates, that may include sorting out the jurisdictions in their own minds until they have a firm comprehension of Public Law based on The Ten Commandments and Due Process, versus private law based on Codes and Regulations and Judicial Discretion.

Many former Bar Attorneys are now joining our ranks and undergoing just exactly this kind of "unlearning" process. It takes about two years on average, based on our experience, for people who have grown up in and practiced private law, to thoroughly adjust to Public Law.

So, ironically, someone who has never gone to a conventional law school nor practiced in the Admiralty/Maritime Court system is likely to have an easier road and quicker grasp of the foundation principles and practices of our courts, simply because they don't have as much to "unlearn".

One of the key differences between our courts and the foreign courts, is that our courts consider both the facts and the law, and hold the power of jury nullification. In other words, our courts have the ability to directly overturn legislation and uphold constitutional guarantees ---powers that the Admiralty and Maritime Courts do not possess and cannot consider exercising.

Learning to shine one's own shoes is strangely analogous to learning to run your own State, your own Courts, and your own life. It's simple and practical enough so that anyone can learn to do it, and beneficial enough so that everyone ought to learn. Finding competent Justices of the Peace is just a practical matter of looking among the members of your community and your State Assembly to find those who have "the right stuff" to serve.

So start looking for bright, even-handed, common sense people who have their heads screwed on, a knowledge of the Bible, a willingness to serve, a humble heart, and either the direct experience or the willingness to study Due Process, Rules of Evidence, and American Common Law.

A couple years after Ben got those new shoes, things started looking up for his family. His two oldest brothers matured enough to weigh in on the farm work and took enough burden off their Father so that he could take a paid job in town. With his extra income and the older children taking up position to help on the farm, the family began to flourish. Ben had everything he needed from then on, plus, he had learned to polish his own shoes --- a lesson he would pass on.

Last time I went home to Black River Falls, Wisconsin, I bumped into "Ben" at one of the local hardware stores. He had his son and two grandchildren with him. Every shoe was spic and span.

If we don't already know, we can learn how to polish our own shoes and how to run our own courts. It's all just a practical and caring process of taking care of our own country and community, the same way we care for and maintain a pair of good sturdy shoes.

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·
For Ernest and All the White Hats

One of the things I learned a long time ago, is that you have to deal with people as individuals,because group-think leads to injustice. And prejudice. And bigotry. Just because my husband and I are of "royal blood" doesn't mean that we are royal skunks. Our Ancestors broke from the Bloodline snobs a long time ago and have paid with our lives and fortunes for it ever since.

And just because I helped Pope Benedict give Notice to this Employees of their wrong-doing does not mean that I was helping him do any wrong-doing. Benedict was being black-mailed, but he still took action to correct and to help us derail the machine.

Read that: I was helping him in his efforts to correct the Mess, prior to those efforts being side-lined by Francis and the Curia. Remember those twelve Archbishops who were killed in a train wreck? Get a clue.
Good men have died over this power struggle --- many of them Catholic and some Protestants, too. But exposing the rot and miasma within the Church and correcting it, is of top priority for everyone on this planet --- Catholic and non-Catholic, too.

As I explained to Robert David Steele:
…..”What appears to have happened is that a single "heir" was assigned by the various Families and he is the "owner" in the legal sense, whereas, there are numerous Trustees operating for (1) the banks and (2) the depositors, plus (3)a cadre of those controlling the bank transfer systems.

Add to that mix the complications that arise when you attempt to interface hundreds of different kinds of currencies and money issued by over 200 countries during the past few centuries and you have a recipe for a Perfect Storm.

And now that you have that recipe, add this one final factor: jurisdiction. Only Lawful Persons can possess Lawful Assets. That is, only people having the proper political status can actually possess and hold land, gold, silver, etc. “

Okay. Got that? What have I and those with me been doing?

Encouraging people to correct their falsified political status records so that they can act as Lawful Persons---- State Citizens. We have been teaching them how to do that, so that they can inherit and possess the land and receive back all the other actual material assets that rightfully belong to them, instead of standing around with a doo-dad in their hair and having everything that is theirs stolen from them under False Pretenses.

And again:
“….the Vatican Boyz were pushing to incorporate all the government services corporations and trying to operate them "as" actual governments, and then simply also redefine all the government workers ----and eventually all the people in entire countries as purportedly "voluntary" franchises of these governmental services corporations.

By incorporation, they effectively "killed" these governments and people on paper, reducing them to the level and standing of legal fiction entities. And they were doing this so secretively, with such a high degree of compartmentalization,that nobody saw it. But the end game of all this, is that the "winners" --- would be those who maintained their status as living people and as unincorporated governments.

According to their plan, the Holy See would be left as the only such government on Earth. They would then literally possess and own everything of an actual and factual nature --- and the rest of us would be disinherited "things" trapped in the realm of fiction, the proverbial Land of OZ. Thus, the mad dream of the Unum Sanctum Trust would finally be realized as One World Government under the Bishop of Rome, and the Bishop of Rome would serve Mammon as the head of the so-called "Secular Church".

They came very close to succeeding. When we woke up there were only six unincorporated governments of any size left in the world.
That number had dwindled down to three by the time we managed to bring forward The United States of America[Unincorporated].

The United Nations has been populated by incorporated government services corporations all operating under the old Vichy French "UN Corp"--- so it would appear to "represent" all the countries on Earth, but would actually be just a bunch of franchises like Dairy Queen franchises under the thumb and forefingers of the UN Corp stockholders, and the principal stockholder with controlling interest would be the Pope.

There were very few Lawful Persons left "alive" on paper who could inherit the land and other physical assets, and what they were doing by hook or by crook, was something similar to the theme of the popular "Highlander" movies---- finding ways to kill off the remaining few. That's why, among other things, the pressure to destroy the governments of North Korea and Iran.

And it has all been predicated on commercial fraud and obstruction of trade and illegal banking and securities operations, including commodity rigging and counterfeiting.”

That is, crime.

So, for those who want to take pot-shots at me for being a “royal” --- remember that it was “royals” of a different kind who fought and bled to give you all “sovereignty in your own right”, so that you could stand as men and women and as Free Holders in your own country---if you have sense enough to do so.

It was my ancestors and my husband’s ancestors who gave the world the concept of “Might for right.”And the Magna Carta. And who also championed the “novel idea” that men could and should learn to govern themselves. Guilty as charged.

Let me also remind them that Pope Benedict took action in behalf of the people of this Earth despite being black-mailed and having his life threatened. And it was because he put a “full stop” on the machinery of the “Secular Church” that he was ousted as Pontiff and replaced by Francis, a man of certain politics.

And yes, so long as the Pope was willing to do the right thing by the people of this planet, I was willing to help him. So long as the Pope was moving toward honest reform, I was willing to help him.

But war-mongers and criminals who think that they have the right to steal from babies what the True God gave them, and those who would dictate the lives of others, and all the miscreants and unrepentant criminals of the world know, that the True God is set against them and that I am set --- and sent --- against them, too.

So pay attention to my works and what I am teaching you, because it is for your good and because by our works we are known and that is the only way that anyone is ever known----including those who claim to be “White Hats”

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

Sending THEM Home

While everyone is running around willy-nilly and certain irresponsible fools are talking about another civil war (Civil War 2.0) on our shores, it's time to remember whose shores these are and the fact that these are our employees.

Now that The United States of America [Unincorporated] is up and assembled and functioning, we can send the entire Municipal Government Pink Slips for insubordination and Breach of Trust and send them home without supper.

Once the Delegators enter the room ---- and we have ---- its time for the Pope and the Queen to step down and do our bidding, not the other way around.

This is our country, our land, our soil. They don't have a tinker's damn to stage any kind of "war" or any mercenary conflict here. If they do, they will be shown up as nothing but international criminals operating in Gross Breach of Trust and Commercial Service Contract.

We will arrest their leaders as criminals and try them for treason and execute them, as per the Public Law of this country and nation.

And we will hold the Pope and the Roman Curia directly responsible in all cases, as the Pope (1) directly owns the Municipal United States Government; (2) indirectly owns (through the Queen) the Territorial United States Government, and (3) owns the United Nations (through majority stock ownership of the UN Corporation).

So any way that Francis and the Boyz want to cut this, they are on the hook for it, 100%, and no getting out of the blame for it and the cost of it, whatever it turns out to be beyond a whole lot of blather.

As for the actual and factual Government of this country, we are giving our Municipal Government Employees and their Boss, the Pope, a straight ultimatum --- either get back in your box and behave, or every single Municipal Employee and Agency Employee is fired, off our payroll, effective 12 December 2019.

That includes the members of the Municipal Congress.

Drop the saber rattling and the impeachment crappola or the next one on the chopping block will be SERCO.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

While everyone is running around willy-nilly and certain irresponsible fools are talking about another civil war (Civil War 2.0) on our shores, it's time to remember whose shores these are and the fact that these are our employees.

---

It seems it is easier for our employees to exercise their authority upon other agents/employees than upon principals.

I am the only authority that I recognize. Do you have a carte de persona? Or are you begging to be protected as evidenced by a REALID ^TM star on your permission to travel documents?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ziero0

It seems it is easier for our employees to exercise their authority upon other agents/employees than upon principals.

I am the only authority that I recognize. Do you have a carte de persona? Or are you begging to be protected as evidenced by a REALID ^TM star on your permission to travel documents?

---

As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.

It is nice to see you though. I thought you had run off without so much as a bye your leave.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.

---

Agents deal with agents. Principals outrank them. As described in the movie MATRIX .... when you see an agent RUN!!! Or as I prefer to do present them with a business card stating that I only deal with Principals.

The carte de persona is described in the First Law of the Defendant ... don't answer until the agent proves his right to represent the principal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bigjon

I thought you had run off without so much as a bye your leave.

---

So I did. Who am I going to request leave of?

A woman gave up her twin sons for adoption. One went to Spain and was named Juan. The other went to the middle east and was called Amal. Years later Juan sent her a photo. She was depressed because she had no photo of Amal until her husband told her "They are identical twins. When you have seen Juan you have seen Amal"

Anna von Reitz
10 hrs ·

Dear Kirk Pendergrass

Let me point something out to you --- nothing in Federal Code pertains to the States and People except those few portions of legislation published in the Federal Record, not the Federal Register, and only those portions published in the Congressional Record that are in alignment with the original intent of the Constitutions are valid.

That means about 8 percent of all the "Acts of Congress" have portions that apply to actual Americans, and of those, about half,are either contrary to the original intent or otherwise invalid from the get-go.

Title 42 says virtually nothing about the actual States or People; it concerns itself with British Territorial Government operations and United States Citizens and issues that don't pertain to any Joe Average American. It's all well and good -- what you are doing -- but it still only pertains properly to Territorial United States Citizens: that is, to Legal Persons, not People.

And why are we bothering to fight that fight?

It would seem that only a rather small percentage of Americans would ever need to do such a thing --- attorneys, doctors, dentists, pilots, and certain other "licensed" professions that have been illegally and immorally conscripted under color of law, are about the only ones impacted.

I am not suggesting that we leave these Americans to their fate, merely that the point is illegal conscription of civilian "assets" all across the board, not a case by case campaign to obtain redress from foreign British Territorial State of State Legislatures that shouldn't even be in operation on our shores.

These are our subcontractors and employees. We don't petition them. We don't seek redress from their legislatures. We kick them in the rump for insubordination and return their "legislation" to them for repeal or correction.

There is an entire living government "of the people, for the people, and by the people" that exists outside of and beyond the Federal Subcontractors and their Agencies and operations, a whole "other" jurisdiction that belongs only to the States and People of this country, and which is foreign with respect to both the United States [Territorial] Citizens, and Municipal "citizens of the United States".

And our Subcontractors operating under our Delegated Powers, the Queen and the Pope, both know it.

How is it that so many other worthy people, including yourself, are caught up and confused about who we are and what we are owed and what the actual proper action is?

I understand that Field may have elected to retain US Citizenship as a result of his own situation, but that leaves him in a different political status --- NOT the normal political status Americans are heir to and which at least 90% of us should be exercising.

If he had corrected his political status prior to all this happening, he wouldn't be in any "Federal" jurisdiction and would not be considered any "subject matter" for them to arrest and impound, either.
Redressing his grievances in the Legislature is part and parcel of accepting Territorial United States Citizenship, and most Americans have no rational reason in the world to accept such a foreign and subordinate political status.

The living people and Lawful Persons of this country are not subject to Statute. As the name implies, Statutory Entities, that is, legal fiction entities, are subject to Statute because they are created by Statute.

Are we created by any form of Statute? My parents would disagree.
The actual People, that is, the Lawful Persons who are State Citizens, retain the right to directly nullify any legislative act, code, or regulation derived from legislation. Our courts can directly overturn any legislation via jury nullification.

No petitioning to any executive officer getting a paycheck from us. No redress sought from the criminals in the various territorial and municipal legislatures.

Just flat out average people operating in their proper political status and organizing their own State and local County assemblies have the power to overturn whatever criminal or civil statutes these roaches "offer" to "presume" upon us while pretending to "represent" us.

Pray tell, why would we need someone to "represent" us, when we are present ourselves?

This curious concept of "representation" is made necessary only by constructive fraud and impersonation being practiced against us by members of the Bar Associations, which are, as you have begun to uncover --- illegal "guilds"---- trade unions. A Bar Card is a Guild Card is a Union Card.

The Bars, both the so-called "American Bar Association" and the "US Bar Association" have been operating what appear to be our courts as closed Union Shops, and the Municipal COURTS have been operating in violation of Federal Code, and they get away with it because they don't operate under Territorial Federal Code, they operate under their own Municipal Code which nobody (hardly) references.

So these foreign interlopers have both been sitting dry docked on our shores, both impersonating us, with the Municipal COURTS operating in flagrant violation of the Smith Act and Taft-Hartley Act, both.

They, the Bar Associations and the Courts they are operating, all need to be busted as criminal enterprises --- undeclared Foreign Agents engaged in racketeering, coercion, identity theft, human trafficking, impersonation, barratry, and more on our shores.

Any legislation repugnant to the Constitution, to the spirit and intent of our Public Law, our Declaration of Independence, or our moral sense, needs to get tossed out the door in our courts without a backward nod to the "Congresses" or the foreign State of State Legislatures. And that is why the perpetrators of the Great Fraud have tried for so long to suppress us and suppress our land and soil jurisdiction courts --- ever since the Civil War.

These animals literally steal our identities as Americans and impersonate us while we are still babies in our cradles, then lie to and extort us into adhesion contracts as youths, and illegally tax and mortgage us to death as adults.

I see no reason for us, Americans, to pander to nor to seek redress from their foreign legislatures. I see reason to fire the whole lot of them and subject them to the actual Public Law of this country and the actual international Law of the Admiralty.

Why bother getting involved in some internecine one-by-one brush fire contest with these Buggers, grinding our way through Due Process and seeking redress from their foreign legislatures?

Why not attack the issue of their unlawful and illegal conscription and press-ganging of Americans into their jurisdiction in the first place, which is at the root of all these problems and issues, including those suffered by "licensed" professionals?

Why not address them in Admiralty and bust them for genocide on paper and human trafficking of American babies in violation of both the Hague and Geneva Conventions?

Where is Quantico when we need them? Forgot who we are? Forgot who they actually work for?

Everyone needs to get a move on and start striking at the roots, not the leaves and branches.

We need to kick their rumps back into the sea where they belong, liquidate their corporations as criminal operations, and seize upon every asset that they think they own. We need to bust up their monopolies including the Media Circus and Bar Associations and rip and tear through them like so much frozen butter in the face of some very hot knives.

Of course, I support any and every effort to put an end to the criminality by any means and in whatever venue. I do. But fighting the brush fires is not really the point. Nailing the arsonists flat to the floor is the point.

Anna von Reitz
9 hrs ·

BWAAAH! What Have I Been Telling You???

For several years now, I have flatly defended Pope Benedict and praised him for his efforts to dismantle the criminal machinery of the Pontificate and the incorporated governmental services entities masquerading "as" national governments worldwide. I have explained and published my role giving Notice and Due Process to his employees, to stop the wrong-doing and fraud they have been engaged in, in numerous articles, published letters, and especially my book, Disclosure 101.

But there have been those who have instead told you that Benedict XVI was an evil man and that as Pope he "had to be" in on the fraud, and those who have tried to paint me as an "Agent of the Vatican" even though it is plain as the nose on my face that acting as a "private attorney" for Benedict XVI has nothing to do with the Vatican.

My business with the Pope was with the Holy See, regarding the contracts we hold with them since the 1700's; the Vatican only came into existence in 1929.

And now, today, look at what comes across my desk.
Confirmation of the "Vatican Coup" led by Soros, Obummer, Killary, Biden, and the rest of the Goon Squad from Hell, promoting a radical leftist --- Pope Francis, who, technically, isn't even eligible to serve as Pope.

Jesuits take their Oath to serve the Pope, which logically precludes the premise of a Jesuit holding the Office. Anyone who knows anything about the Roman Catholic Church was taken aback by that, including millions of Catholics.

And here, at last, is the confirmation of what I always knew: Benedict XVI was black mailed and deposed by force. The whole Papacy has been reduced to a politicized farce and Francis does well not to accept obedience, because he is owed none. Read on:
WikiLeaks: Clinton, Obama, Soros Overthrew Pope Benedict In Vatican Coup Posted by Francesco I

George Soros, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton orchestrated a coup in the Vatican to overthrow the conservative Pope Benedict and replace him with radical leftist Pope Francis, according to a group of Catholic leaders citing evidence from various sources including WikiLeaks emails.

Pope Benedict XVI reigned as Pope of the Catholic Church from 2005 to 2013 before unexpectedly resigning in unusual circumstances. Becoming the first Pope to step down since Pope Gregory XII in 1415, Benedict is widely considered the first to do so on his own initiative since Pope Celestine V in 1294.However the group of Catholic leaders cite new evidence uncovered in emails released by WikiLeaks to claim the conservative Pope Benedict did not actually resign on his own initiative, but was pushed out of the Vatican by a coup that the group of researchers are calling the “Catholic Spring.”

Soros, Obama and Clinton used the United States’ diplomatic machinery, political muscle, and financial power to coerce, bribe and blackmail “regime change” in the Roman Catholic Church in order to replace the conservative Benedict with the current Pope Francis – who has since become an unlikely mouthpiece for the international left, stunning Catholics around the world.

Now the group of Catholic leaders have sent a letter to President Trump urging him to launch an official investigation into the activities of George Soros, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton (and others) who they allege were involved in orchestrating Catholic Spring that resulted in their goal of “regime change” in the Vatican.

The Catholic leaders cite eight specific questions they seek to have answered concerning suspect events that led to the resignation of Pope Benedict, the first papal abdication in 700 years.

“Specifically, we have reason to believe that a Vatican ‘regime change’ was engineered by the Obama administration,” say the petitioners, in their January 20remnantnewspaper.com/…/3001-did-vatica….

“We were alarmed to discover,” their letter notes, “that, during the third year of the first term of the Obama administration your previous opponent, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and other government officials with whom she associated proposed a Catholic ‘revolution’ in which the final demise of what was left of the Catholic Church in America would be realized.”

The letter includes links to documents and news stories underscoring their claims. It first directs attention to the notorious Soros-Clinton-Podesta e-mails disclosed last year by WikiLeaks, in which Podesta and other progressives discussed regime change to remove what they described as the “middle ages dictatorship” in the Catholic Church.

Regarding the Podesta e-mails in question, The New Americanwww.thenewamerican.com/…/24289-clinton-c…
last October:“

Podesta, a longtime Clinton adviser/confidante and hand-picked top activist for left-wing funder George Soros, revealed in a 2011 e-mail that he and other activists were working to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, an obvious reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized that same year by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team that destabilized the Middle East and brought radical Islamist regimes and terrorist groups to power in the region.

The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church, which he described as a “middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”

In their letter to President Trump, the group of Catholics leaders write: “Approximately a year after this e-mail discussion, which was never intended to be made public, we find that Pope Benedict XVI abdicated under highly unusual circumstances and was replaced by a pope whose apparent mission is to provide a spiritual component to the radical ideological agenda of the international left. The Pontificate of Pope Francis has subsequently called into question its own legitimacy on a multitude of occasions.”
“We remain puzzled by the behavior of this ideologically charged Pope, whose mission seems to be one of advancing secular agendas of the left rather than guiding the Catholic Church in Her sacred mission,” they say, expressing the thoughts of millions of Catholics around the world stunned by Pope Francis’s left-wing ideology. “It is simply not the proper role of a Pope to be involved in politics to the point that he is considered to be the leader of the international left.”

Theyremnantnewspaper.com/…/3001-did-vatica…
:
“With all of this in mind, and wishing the best for our country as well as for Catholics worldwide, we believe it to be the responsibility of loyal and informed United States Catholics to petition you to authorize an investigation into the following questions:

– To what end was the National Security Agency monitoring the conclave that elected Pope Francis?

– What other covert operations were carried out by US government operatives concerning the resignation of Pope Benedict or the conclave that elected Pope Francis?

– Did US government operatives have contact with the “Cardinal Danneels Mafia”?

– International monetary transactions with the Vatican were suspended during the last few days prior to the resignation of Pope Benedict. Were any U.S. Government agencies involved in this?

– Why were international monetary transactions resumed on February 12, 2013, the day after Benedict XVI announced his resignation? Was this pure coincidence?

– What actions, if any, were actually taken by John Podesta, Hillary Clinton, and others tied to the Obama administration who were involved in the discussion proposing the fomenting of a “Catholic Spring”?

– What was the purpose and nature of the secret meeting between Vice President Joseph Biden and Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican on or about June 3, 2011?

– What roles were played by George Soros and other international financiers who may be currently residing in United States territory?”

The investigation the group of Catholic leaders is requesting of President Trump should be of interest to more than just Catholics. George Soros’s ability to co-opt leading political figures to assist his radical plans for nation states is well known; but his ability to force “regime change” in the Catholic church, an institution previously thought impenetrable from the outside, raises serious questions about his potential for global chaos. The investigation — and punishment — should begin at once.

remnantnewspaper.com___

http://gloria.tv/article/DbyFpcQKRK7i4jp3sei1peUS8

Anna von Reitz
18 hrs ·

Facts to Keep Firmly in Mind

The actual government of this country is vested entirely in the living people. That is why it is called a government "of the people, for the people, by the people".

It follows that no incorporated entity can ever be the government of this country.

Corporations of various kinds can serve the living people. Only.
When a living man, one of the people, acts in a Public Capacity -- for example, serves as a Juror, he is acting in a "corporate" capacity --- the Office of a Juror, but still not acting in an "incorporated" capacity.

This is the same difference you see between unincorporated small businesses, like Mel's Autobody, and incorporated businesses like GE, Inc., or Intel, Inc.

A unincorporated small business is "corporate" but unincorporated. It does not owe its existence to any charter granted by any government.

In the same way, when a living man acts in a Public Capacity, as a State Citizen, a Juror, a Sheriff, a Coroner, a Justice of the Peace, and so on, he acts in a corporate but still unincorporated capacity as one of the People.

While acting in a Public Capacity of Office, each American acts as either (1) a Lawful Person (land jurisdiction) or a (2) Legal Person (sea jurisdiction). The land jurisdiction protects you while you are standing on the land and soil, and the Queen or King of Britain is supposed to be protecting you on the "High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways" but they haven't been doing that.

"We, the People" who created the Constitutions were all acting as Lawful Persons. The Founders were acting as State Citizens and State Delegates to Congress---that is, they were acting in a "corporate" but "unincorporated" capacity. If they had been acting as Legal Persons-- that is, incorporated entities, of any kind, the phrase would read, "We, the Persons".

It is only when we adopt the same political status and shoulder the same responsibility that we have the same standing as, "We, the People" in the current day, and are able to enforce, negotiate, and enter the jurisdiction of the Constitutions and their guarantees.
So-- take that fact to heart. Underline it.

Now, here's the next fact, even though you were born in the proper political status, your name and identity were kidnapped and transported --- "trafficked" into the realm of corporations and incorporated entities, the strange "Land of Oz" world, where both Legal Persons and INCORPORATED PERSONS exist.

According to the fraud artists, you were identified as a "Legal Person" and, furthermore, as a Public Person -- but not an American, when you were just a few days old. The evidence of this is the Birth Certificate the rats were obliged to give you.

It shows that you were the victim of "Unconscionable Contracting Processes" when you were only a few days old, long before you could become conscious of what this meant.

As a result, you are being "presumed to be" a British Territorial Citizen, like someone born in Puerto Rico, a member of the Commonwealth, who is, for whatever reasons, living as a "resident" --- a temporary sojourner in America, called a "United States Citizen".

Obviously, this is a false presumption and you never knowingly, willing, or voluntarily adopted such a foreign political status. You were born in an actual State, like Kansas, and you were far too young to choose to live in any imaginary State of State like the Territorial State of Kansas (or the Land of Oz).

Nonetheless, the Wicked Witches cast a spell on you, trafficked you into their realm and redefined you as a Legal Person, a Public Person, and a British Territorial Citizen obligated to follow Federal Code, but not having any Constitutional Guarantees.

They did this because they acted in Breach of Trust concerning you and did not fully inform you of the circumstance, nor did they assist you to recoup your natural, lawful and owed political status. Why?
Because by "redefining" you and trafficking you into their foreign jurisdiction, they could latch onto your Good Name and Estate and buy and sell your Person and everything you own.

So, the first thing these Evil Cretins did was to sell you and your labor to the Pope and his Flying Monkeys.

You were then "additionally" presumed to be a Dual Citizen of both the British Territorial United States AND a MUNICIPAL "citizen of the United States".

This also took place under cover of darkness, before you were old enough to object, and resulted in several incorporated entities operating under you name being established "in your name".

These are incorporated THINGS are like any incorporated entity you are familiar with --- and may be defined as different kinds of trusts, C-Corps, S-Corps, 501 (c) 3 Corps, Cooperatives, Public Transmitting Utilities, Foundations, LLCs, LLP's and whatever other phony business structure designations the Roman Curia can define and sell as patented and trademarked and copyrighted products.

JOHN DOE is a Public Charitable Trust.
JOHN R. DOE is a Public Transmitting Utility.
JOHN ROY DOE is a constructive Cestui Que Vie Trust.
And so on.

All these entities are created by the Municipal United States Government, and according to the Vatican Chancery Court, they are all supposed to be "gifts" to you ---- rather like the Trojan Horse, because on the other side of Dual Citizenship created by your Stolen Identity, the Queen gets all the benefit of these "gifts" and you get to pay for them. And the Queen works for the Pope.....

The excuse for this is that they have been pretending to be involved in a perpetual "civil war" with the Queen's Territorial (Northern) Government against the Pope's Municipal (Southern) Government in a continuance of the illegal Mercenary Conflict known as The American Civil War.

It ended more than 150 years ago, but they kept right on pretending, because it profited them and let them pillage and plunder you. That is, they acted in Gross Breach of Trust and Commercial Service Contract.

All that is silly enough, if the consequences for Americans were not so dire, but on top of that, the fraud is two-faced and double-sided, in other ways.

The Pope controls the Queen who acts as his Overseer for the Commonwealths, and the British Territorial Government is operating as a Commonwealth. So when the British Territorial United States fights with the Municipal United States, you've got the Pope telling the Queen to fight with him and with those who are working for him.

It's actually all just a mercenary conflict with the Pope against the Pope (indirectly through the Queen), which is ridiculous.

More recently, the Pope, has attempted to use the United Nations as his "storefront" and bring UN Troops in to fight with the Territorial United States. Either way, he hoped to get a hot war going and kill off millions of his Priority Creditors --- but as you can now see, since the Pope owns majority stockholder interest in the UN Corp, he is merely proposing to fight with himself again.

Now he is attempting to spread the war his predecessors and minions created in the Middle East, by selling off his purported interests in the two Governmental Services Corporations --- "the" United States. Inc. and "the" "United States of America, Inc." to his Arab and Jewish Creditors, so that maybe they can drum up an excuse to bring their quarrels here.

Just look what they have done in Europe. Wholesale "seeded" war throughout Europe using humanitarian aid as their excuse --- but not their object.

Take a tiny Norwegian hamlet of 6,000 souls, import 300 Shiite Muslims and 300 Sunni Muslims, and what do you get? War in Norway, Norwegians unable to ride their bikes to work because the "crazies are using bicycle blades and saws to kill each other in our streets now, and often enough, killing us, too".

The Pope and the Boyz aren't creating peace on Earth this holiday season. Far from it. They are creating new wars, endless wars, endless conflicts, because that is how they make their money and excuse themselves for the evil they choose to create.

But is it the fault of the Muslims, really? What do you expect? They have been at each other's throats for centuries. Both sides have have evicted from their homes. Their families have been killed and abused and robbed and given no peace or rest for generations.

What I want to know is --- who are and where are the senseless evil bureaucrats who didn't separate these populations and encapsulate them, instead of blowing them like mold spores all over the entire Earth?

We are plainly, loudly, and unequivocally telling Francis to go stuff his head up the nearest elephant butt, because no matter what they say or do: these entities that he controls are our employees.

They have no permission to front any kind of a "war" or commercial mercenary operation on our soil, and neither do any would-be "Successors to Contract", either.

Hence the word has gone out to the Pope, the Brits, the Saudis, the Israelis, everyone who needs to know. We are the actual employers of these "governmental services providers" and we have had enough of their Breach of Trust and Dis-service.

There is the Fact that needs your attention. We are the actual Employers of these Monsters.

If the cretins responsible for this situation don't back down, it won't matter if Nancy Pelosi impeaches Donald Trump as the "President" of "the" United States, Inc., a bankrupt corporation liquidated for criminal activity. It won't matter who was stupid enough to buy such vacuous claims and non-existent property interests.

All that will matter is that throughout the world: (1) the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church will be exposed as a crime syndicate that has dishonored our Trust and our service contract with them without cause; (2) the Queen and her Predecessors have done the same; and (3) no Successors have a contract of any kind, except the quid pro quo we established for President Trump on a month by month basis.

We own the actual unincorporated United States and these Several States and the States of America, and we also own our unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America --- we are the actual, factual government of this country. All the rest, is just foreign subcontractors making a huge mess.

We are not at all confused nor are we amused. Our records and our paperwork and our liens are all in effect and in order.

Buying and selling and trading upon what they don't in fact have any valid claim to own, may be the style and habit of these hucksters, but at the end of the day, it's all still ours and we can hire whomever we wish to hire to do a better job of providing us with services, because in actual fact --- as an entire country, we are richer than Midas. And we are owed our re-venue.

We are also owed peace, because the actual government of this country has been at peace since 1814 and if the erstwhile "Trustees" force us into any other pattern or status, this is Published Notice to the Principals and their Agents, that in our world, those who start wars pay for them 100% and also do so 100% of the time, to the full, plus interest.

The actual government of this country did not participate in the baseless and fraudulent "Civil War" promoted by our Employees.

We aren't paying for any "Mouse That Roared" scenario. Our Employees are going to stand down and shut up or be shut out.

Keep these facts firmly in mind going forward. There is and can be no "civil war" here so long as we overtly forbid it --- which we do, and so long as we, the actual Employers, refuse to fund it and/or refuse to fund those people including the members of "the" Municipal Congress who are attempting to pull off this gross criminal escapade.

There needs to be a Detente established with Rome and with the Vatican and the Queen and all their Bankers, such that they clearly understand that we know who we are and also know who they are; we have assembled our States accordingly, and we are "home" with 40 States reporting and more on the way.

We are conducting our own business, thank you very much.
As the actual and factual Americans, those having the political status, standing, and jurisdiction to speak as "We, the People", we are telling Pope Francis and the Federal Civil Service and the Federal Agencies to go back in their box, mind their business, do their jobs, stop fomenting fraud and causing trouble, or they will all be out of work.
Any would-be Successors are similarly instructed and under the same demands and particulars.

Judging by the impact of numerous other "federal government shut downs" they aren't doing anything much anyway----and what they are doing, they are doing wrong.

Anna von Reitz
23 hrs ·

Proof A -Plenty --- I Repeat, Yes!

I have published this before and will publish again. Please everyone be prepared to really dig and update it.

I have had my copy of this list for years. Don't remember if it was the Informer or not who landed this on my desk during the dark days of "complete confusion" back in 1998-1999. It was a welcome addition to the reference desk and at the time, every reference checked out and was easy to find. Remember that "THEY" have been busy Moving the Cheese and you will have to track things down, again, unless you are lucky enough to have "Period Documents" from that time period.

(1) State Citizens v. (2) US Citizens

3. "There are two classes of citizens, citizens of the United States and of the State. And one may be a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter" Gardina v. Board of Registers 48 So. 788, 169 Ala. 155 (1909)

4. Federal citizenship is a municipal franchise domiciled in the District of Columbia, and the political rights of federal citizens are franchises which they hold as privileges at the legislative discretion of Congress.” (Murphy v.Ramsey , 114 U.S. 15 (1885)).

5. (1 "The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the territorial boundaries of the United States," US vs.Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957

6. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia]residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity." Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.

7. “A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in“interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C.Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914).

8. "There is in our Political System, a government of each of the several states and a government of the United States Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own." . US vs. Cruikshank, 92 US 542.

9. "...the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States do not necessarily include all the rights protected by the first eight amendments to the Federal constitution against the powers of the Federal government."Maxwell v Dow, 20 S.C.R. 448, at pg 455;

10. "The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the "citizenship" to the agencies of government." City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

11. "...it might be correctly said that there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States. ..... A citizen of any one of the States of the Union, is held to be, and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing." Ex Parte Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. Rep.300.

12. This can also be confirmed in the definitions section of Title 5 USC, Title 26USC, and Title 1 USC.
Therefore a US citizen is a piece of property. If you read any of those old court cases prior to the civil war where slavery was the issue, the debate was ALWAYS over property rights, therefore a US citizen, is a SLAVE.

13. The Fourteenth Amendment defines what a US citizen is; "Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,....."

14. The so-called Fourteenth Amendment criminally converts US citizenship completely upside down from what the founding fathers intended. A US citizen is a corporation:
Congressional Record , June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A "citizen of the United States" is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.

15. [US citizens] have not the political'[ rights]'which are vested in citizens of the States. They are not constituents of any community in which is vested any sovereign power of government. Their position partakes more of the character of subjects than of citizens. They are subject to the laws of the United States, but have no voice in its management.

If they are allowed to make laws, the validity of these laws is derived from the sanction of a Government in which they are not represented. Mere citizenship they may have, but the political '[rights]' of citizens they cannot enjoy…”People v. De La Guerra,40 Cal. 311, 342 (A.D. 1870) ·

Del Sharp--- United States Code that uses “American national” while maintaining no such status as 14th Amendment “naturalized citizen of the United States”. 8 U.S.C. § 1502 :

Certificate of nationality issued by Secretary of State for person not a naturalized citizen of United States for use in proceedings of a foreign state.

The Secretary of State is authorized to issue, in his discretion and in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by him, a certificate of nationality for any person not a naturalized citizen of the United States who presents satisfactory evidence that he is an AMERICAN NATIONAL and that such certificate is needed for use in judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state. Such certificate shall be solely for use in the case for which it was issued and shall be transmitted by the Secretary of State through appropriate official channels to the judicial or administrative officers of the FOREIGN STATE in which it is to be used.

Corpus Juris Secundum § 883, [t]he United States government is a FOREIGN CORPORATION with respect to a state.8 USC § 1101(a)(21), [t]he term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.”

8 USC § 1101(a)(22), [t]he term “national of the United States” means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.

American national ≠ national/citizen of the United States. These are TWO distinct statuses within the system. The former is a freeman and Freeholder.
----

I might also add, that our research into FDR's Inaugural Address indicates that these cretins have also claimed to own our souls via the issuance of "Baptismal Certificates" returned to them for safe-keeping, but actually traded as "private assets".

So not only do you have to claim your "vessel" --- your DNA and body from the moment of fertilization (not "conception" and not anything else but the moment of fertilization) but you must also claim your private relationship with your Creator since before your physical incarnation here, and also must maintain that you are not a member of any "religious cult".

Anna von Reitz
22 hrs ·

America Never Sold, Just Foreign Corporations Abusing Our Names and Credit

For several days I have been getting this photo lobbed at me, as if it was any huge surprise, and as usual, the people sending it to me have jumped to the mistaken idea that "America" was sold to these Billionaires: Rothschild, Rockefeller, Duponts, Harrimans, and Warburgs in 1927.

NOPE.
The only things sold were foreign corporations "doing business as" the United States (Inc.) and the United States of America, (Inc.) ----- British Territorial and Municipal corporations in the business of providing "essential governmental services" --- not our country.

That is the key fact you have to know and stick to and realize that while corporations can be bought and sold and go bankrupt, etc., this actual country and the people who live here are not eligible nor in need of any "bankruptcy protection". We are, in fact, immune from bankruptcy of any kind. Period.

So when you see things like this --- step back, remember your history. What was happening in the 1920's? The Internal Revenue Service was brought ashore as a Delaware Corporation in 1925, the stock exchanges were bought up and up and up in preparation for the Big Bust in 1929, just two years after this report.

We are in the midst of the Roaring Twenties and these are five of the Robber Baron Families benefiting from all the graft and identity theft and "false titles" being issued by "the" United States of America, Incorporated.

If you own a house and you have a Lawn Service and a Housekeeping Service and they both act crazy and abuse your credit without you knowing or approving and then they go bankrupt ---- what happens?

Well, the bankruptcy and the credit theft is their problem and the problem of the banks issuing the credit ---- not yours. And as for the rest, it doesn't matter if they stay in business or go out of business after the bankruptcy, because it has nothing to do with you as their Employer.

You can cluck, you can duck, you can offer help, you can ignore the whole situation and deny them as much as access to a single penny of all the credit that is owed to you. Why?

Because they are all incorporated entities, separate from you in nature and in fact, and the most that you really have to do is look around for other organizations that can mow your lawn and swab your kitchen floors.

Give Paul a little while to post the actual news photo. It's interesting, but it does not mean that "America" was sold---or bankrupted, either. It's just a big corporate merger that subsequently went South and created the Great Depression, because these men were wanted it that way and profited themselves from it by bilking you.

So, learn from it, and don't let them get away with what they are trying to do again.

Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·

Frustration on the Home Front - Mine

I realize that there are those of you who want action, action, action.

There is actually more than enough to do, if you concentrate on learning all that you need to know and mastering the ins and outs of setting up your own State Assembly, your own Courts, and your own State Militia and Offices. But instead of doing that, certain people just have to rush around, looking for other things to do and more rabbit holes to tunnel around in.

No, we don't need any Treaty of Peace. We were never involved in any unresolved war. We are members of the Federation of States. Not the Confederation of States of States.

Think, people. The actual States are sovereign entities. They cannot go bankrupt. They don't need insurance -- they have indemnity.

Our actual government hasn't been at war since 1814.

American State Nationals and American State Citizens are owed The Law of Peace, AR 27 -161- 1. Period. And there is no excuse for anyone in government not knowing that and honoring that.

The entities that need to enter into peace accords are the States of America Confederation members, and these cannot be formed and "reconstructed" until our actual States assemble and charter them.

So get the horse in front of the cart and realize that there is a profound difference between States that are members of the Federation doing business as The United States of America and the States of States that are members of the long-dormant Confederation doing business as the States of America.

We have to assemble the States of the Federation, and then the States of the Federation reconstruct (re-charter) the State of States of the Confederation. Wisconsin reclaims the property assets vested in The State of Wisconsin and re-charters it, for example.

Next order of irritation....

No, there is no advantage to any Joe Average American in joining any tribal trust and doing so automatically voids all the work that you have done to extract yourselves from the maze.

Our States are Nations.

Our States require one singular political status --- one nationhood.

You can't be part of the Algonquin Nation and serving as part of the Wisconsin Assembly for the same reason that you can't belong to the Texas Assembly and the Wisconsin Assembly at the same time, and for the same reason that you can't be a US Citizen and a State Citizen at the same time.

One means one. Singular means singular. No other allegiances or political statuses are allowed while adopting American State Citizenship and running a State Assembly.

Actual Native Americans have always been free of taxation and are Constitutionally guaranteed that. It has nothing to do with belonging to a trust and everything to do with meeting the Federal definition of "native". Last I heard, that requires at least one-eighth native DNA.

Tribes can adopt white people as friends and family within their own community but this makes no difference to Washington, DC. White people can belong to tribes if they wish, but they get no tax or other benefits and won't be recognized as Natives by the Federal Government.

White people claiming tax exemption or other "Federal benefits" as Tribal Members are regularly prosecuted for tax evasion and fraud--- and they should be. What is given to one should not be claimed by another.

So if you are Native, there are some advantages to being Native, but there are also downsides, too. Native Tribes are under a condition of Dependent Sovereignty. As a result, all Native Tribal Members are (with a few exceptions) considered United States Citizens and citizens of the United States.

This precludes them from accepting Tribal status and benefits and State Citizenship at the same time.

We have noted and formally declared that our States of the Union accept people of all races, kinds, colors, and ethnicity without prejudice, meaning that so far as our States are concerned Natives are as welcome as anyone else to embrace the protections and benefits of State Citizenship.

But also like everyone else, once you step over the fence, you are no longer eligible to receive emoluments from any foreign government and participate in a State Government at the same time.

Anna von Reitz
4 hrs ·
IRS Fraud 101 - Tacit Admission

I recently mentioned that HR - 1 [House Resolution 1] of 2017 is a tacit admission of wrong-doing with respect to the so-called Sixteenth Amendment, in that it attempts to redefine the taxing authority under which the "Income Tax" is collected and to place it under the general taxation provisions of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1.

Why is that important?

They are admitting that they've been collecting this tax under false premises for decades.

They are admitting that they had no subject matter jurisdiction over money accrued from our labor as men and women--- our earnings and salaries that they taxed as "personal" --- meaning "corporate" income.

As Thomas Freed has said, regardless of any power to create a tax, there must also be the ability to write law to enforce it. "The fact that the 16th Amendment never gives Congress the authority to write law with respect to the enforcement of this alleged direct taxing power....is just ignored...."

Notice that Congress has the power to tax us, but only under the limits and constraints of the Constitutions.

And next....
Notice that Congress can tax Federal Citizens, both Territorial and Municipal, any way it wishes to tax them. Constitutional constraints don't apply to Federal Employees and their direct dependents.

So...
This is another case of the foreign court system operating under Roman Law and "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived."

All my American Readers now know that this law was created for and applied to whom? United States Citizens and "citizens of the United States" ---- Federal Employees and their Dependents, in other words.

Federal workers are not in receipt of any Constitutional guarantees, so they were fair game and not protected by Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, nor by Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4.

Federal citizens of both kinds, military and Federal Civil Service, are defined by the Constitutions and are not parties to these agreements, so they can be abused at will.

Simply by redefining all of us as "Volunteers" working for the Federal Government for free, as "Withholding Agents", they could strip us of our constitutional protections, too.

And they did.

So what does this change in the source of claimed authority from the Sixteenth Amendment to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 do?
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 contains no ability and no claim to the ability to impose an un-apportioned direct tax on us and our earnings and salaries.

They can continue to do whatever they like to the Federal Employees and their Dependents, just as they always could before, but for those of us who declare our proper political status as Americans, the actual constitutional protections clamp down again.

If Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 is the only basis for the income tax, then it must also take the form of an impost, duty, or excise tax and the source of that impost, duty, or excise tax must be explicitly stated in the written law and that source must be taxable.

And we already know that 15 USC 17 specifically excludes any "excise taxation of labor", and we also know that as originally enacted in 1913 and still maintained as Subtitle A, Chapters 1-6, the intended "foreign persons" were all the Federal Employees, so that there is no possible application to the earnings and salaries of Joe Average Americans working in these United States.

Take home message --- direct un-apportioned taxation of the earnings and salaries of average Americans as Federal "income" has always been illegal.

They simply contrived to get around this fact by: (1) alleging that we "volunteered" to act as Federal Employees (Withholding Agents) and (2) misidentifying us as British Territorial Citizens and/or Municipal citizens of the United States at birth.

This "unlawful conversion" of our political status stripped us of our Constitutional protections and guarantees and having converted us into "Federal Citizens" then made us subject to whatever taxes they imposed on their own employees.

So, they've admitted -- tacitly--that the Sixteenth Amendment was bogus as a taxation authority, and that also means that all the tax enforcement actions taken against average Americans by IRS Agents acting "under the 16th Amendment" from 1913 to 2018, were also bogus.

And now we get down to the reason that the Sixteenth Amendment was always a bogus taxation authority with respect to Joe Average American.

The "Constitution" that was amended by the "Sixteenth Amendment" was actually the Articles of Incorporation for a Scottish Commercial Corporation, merely calling itself "The United States of America" --- Incorporated. And that corporation went bankrupt and liquidated in 1906.

So we have been treated to the spectacle of a hundred years-plus of vicious taxation based on the By-Laws of a defunct Scottish Commercial Corporation that was infringing on our Good Name for purposes of deliberate deceit and identity theft. And is trying to do so again.

But that's another story.

For now, declare your proper political status, record it, give notification of it, and if you are not a Federal Employee or direct dependent of a Federal Employee, revoke your election to pay Federal Income Taxes.

Thomas Freed has done a great deal of work on these issues though I have not been able to spend adequate time to evaluate it; it seems likely that he does not understand the reasons that the 16th Amendment had to be abandoned and may not understand that Federal Citizens were always subject to being taxed in ways beyond the constitutional provisions.

Most Americans remain stubbornly unaware of the existence of the two second class citizenship statuses of our Federal Employees and the impacts on them and, if we are not vigilant, on us.

Be that as it may, Freed does understand the implication of this tacit admission. Those who want to investigate more can find more at:

www.IRSzoom.com & www.Tax-Freedom.comwww.TaxBible.com & www.AmericanTaxBible.com

Anna von Reitz
December 15 at 1:43 PM ·

Glitzy Christians and Sunshine Patriots

I was talking with a friend recently and he came up with a new description that startled me, but I knew right away what he was talking about: "glitzy Christians". We both have met many multi-millionaires and even billionaires in the course of our lifetimes and have rubbed shoulders and noses with these men and women over the course of decades, but somehow had never discussed our mutual experiences with the wealthy Christian community.

Of course, I nodded. I knew exactly what he was saying, when he said "glitzy Christians".

Christians who spend money on a new private jet every year, and who go hang-gliding in Nepal. Christians who wouldn't dream of missing the winter season in Geneva. Christians who wear million-dollar diamonds on the golf course. Christians who have season tickets at the Vienna Opera, that they might use once a year.

The very best of them have "a" cause or maybe two, that they are passionate about. Saving the wild horses of the western states. Providing homes for outcast teenagers in LA. Promoting adult literacy. Saving wild parrots in Borneo.

I wondered what Jesus would say. I wondered if it is even possible to be "Christian" and "glitzy" at the same time.

Of course, it's not my call. Of course, I am not privy to the history of their souls or the lessons they are trying to learn. But if you think about it, Jesus was the Great Leveler, the One who brought it all down to brass tacks: tax collectors and prostitutes, Roman soldiers, Samaritans, lepers, sinners and outcasts of every kind came to him. The rich and famous stayed away.

Too controversial. Too common.
He is the one who said, "If you would be perfect, go and give all that you have away to the poor."

It is part of His Testament that we cannot serve both God and Mammon.

So maybe being rich is not such a good thing.

Perhaps it is an obstacle to our souls' freedom and growth, that leaves us empty and disconnected at the end of the day, as so many of my very wealthy acquaintances seem to be.

So many of them seem to be like little kids whistling in the dark, delighted that they "made it" and are so rich and powerful, and yet....
Empty. Alone. Depressed. Running hither and thither, restlessly searching for meaning.

They show up on my doorstep when they get in trouble with the government, and they presume because they are wealthy that they can buy first in line treatment. But they can't.

They make their case about how important they are and how important their issues are, but I seldom agree. Usually, they are just like everyone else with a beef, a fight with a regulatory agency, or the IRS or a Zoning Commission someplace.

It's not that I am not sympathetic when "the government" is in the wrong, as it often is. It's more a matter of seeing them and their problems without the fake glory of their money, and knowing that 90% of the time, their problems are just like everyone else's problems. They only think that they are special because they are rich.

Recently, a billionaire acquaintance was arrested for money laundering and other charges. I thought back to when he approached me for a legal opinion about his latest get-richer-scheme. I wasn't encouraging. He left me with the tab for lunch. Now, he's in jail.

I am wondering if he cashiered enough money with his family to pay for his defense team. No doubt the government has locked down his own resources and left his parents to pay his bail -- and all this, just before Christmas.

I'm sorry he didn't take my advice. I'm sorry he was so wrong-headed about basic things, like being grateful when someone takes time out of their day and gives you a legal opinion for free. Like not sticking "the little people" with the bill. Like using your wealth for something more and better than just accruing more and more and more....
Like caring --- really caring --- about the world we live in.

There's so much that he could have done, both in terms of making money and giving back. Oh, he wanted his freedom, but he wasn't interested in helping others achieve theirs. Contributing to the overall push to restore our lawful government wasn't on his radar. Just tweaking things so that he could be free was enough, in his opinion.

Unfortunately, that seems to be par for the course with the rich and famous. That's why their money actually does so little worthy work and contributes so little to the benefit of humanity.

Why invest in State Assemblies that will restore the lawful government of this country, when you could invest in mini-golf courses, instead?

So I paid the lunch tab for him and his buddies and I smiled and I walked away, knowing that I was richer than all of them.

And then today I got a note from a woman who is reduced to living on SSI, and it's Christmastime, and she sent me a donation of $25 for our work here, and she apologized because she couldn't afford to send more.
I sat at my desk and wept.

That same billionaire could have given me $25 million, and it wouldn't have hurt him half as much, as what she shared from what little she had.

I wrote back to her and told her that we recently hit rock bottom with all the expenses we've had here, all across the board. We got down to 26 cents in our account, but we didn't go in the red. And her $25 was the first contribution after that low point.
Think about that.

There haven't been any big donors helping us pursue the American National Credit owed to Americans. There haven't been any "investors" backing our bid to recoup the gold FDR stole from our Great-Grandparents and Grandparents. No "glitzy Christians" have cared enough about the country to weigh in on America's side of the issues. No Big Timers have paid our way to the Philippines or the Hague or Rome.
They seem quite content that everything go to wrack and ruin, so long as their investments run high. America? Their neighbors? The communities they live in? Who cares?

A woman who is so crippled up, she's on SSI.
A teen in Baltimore who makes a living mowing lawns in the summer and shoveling snow in the winter.

A cowboy out in Montana who sends $20 every pay day.
A man in New York who sends a small percentage of every sale he makes.... $1.01, $2.89, $1.78......

A retired steam and boiler technician, a waitress at Don's Diner, a Korean War Vet, a farmer in the Midwest facing eviction, a dock worker who is on Workman's Comp, and so the list goes on. Our contributors.

Not a truly rich man among them.

If anyone has cause in years to come, to go back and look at how we survived the winter of 2019-2020, and how our effort grew despite everything against it. and they pour over our books and accounts as much as they like, they won't be able to say that there was any political party behind us, or any rich financier.

All they will find will be "un-glitzy" people and patriots who cared.
The day will come when the rich and famous will beat a path to our door, just as they now trample the road into Washington, DC, seeking favors and pay offs and buy offs and all the rest of it. Count on me to turn a deaf ear--- not to any injustice, but to any pretension of importance on their parts.

It's clear to me who the really important people are, the ones who make the wheels turn, who wash the cars and the dishes, who feed the hungry, who do all the work and bear all the burdens. The race is not to the swift. The glory does not belong to the rich and famous.

It belongs to us, down here in the trenches, slogging along day to day and year to year, to our workmates and families, to our friends. The glory always belongs to those who think and who care --- and it always comes down to us, because it is our will that finds its way to expression. It's our dream that we, together, build.

We won't be alone or empty or wondering what life was all about when our time comes. We won't regret missing the ski season at St. Moritz. Or the unused season tickets at the Vienna Opera.

Anna von Reitz
December 15 at 7:27 PM ·

The Bar Association and US Democracy

The Bar Association is a Guild -- a European-style Labor Union.

A Bar Association "license" is a Union Card.

Bar Associations are operating their foreign courts in this country as Closed Union Shops.

This is in flagrant violation of the Smith Act and Taft-Hartley Act, which are laws of the Territorial United States, published as part of the Federal Code.

The [Territorial] Federal Code is not being enforced by President Trump as Commander-in-Chief, most likely because: (a) he doesn't realize that it is his job to oversee and discipline these foreign quasi-military courts; (b) they are using the Municipal COURTS to violate the Territorial law; (c) people assume (wrongly, it turns out) that members of the Bar Association would obey, and not evade, the law; (d) all the above.

Law is an occupation of common right in this country and always has been. Attorneys are not allowed to speak for any injured parties or to deliver hearsay evidence in our courts.

Demands or "provocations" demanding that anyone procure an Bar Attorney or that they accept a Public Defender, are part of the evidence that these foreign courts are engaged in attempted human trafficking and constructive fraud against Americans.

This is yet another evidence in the face of obvious admission that the British Territorial Government is a "democracy" --- that is, it functions by Mob Rule. A 51% mandate legalizing murder, for example, is sufficient to condone wholesale homicide in such a vicious and primitive political system as theirs; it must also be faced that the British Territorial
Government has never yet achieved any kind of mandate approaching 51% of the eligible voters, that less than 30% typically turn out in any election year, and that of those a mere plurality of 11-12% is what carries their excuse for a "vote".

Please also note that "Political Parties" are foreign to the American System of Government, and are evils (very expensive evils) that only arose in this country in the wake of the Civil War.

Any American reading this who isn't scandalized, should be.

We spend billions of dollars every election cycle for the purpose of electing new slave masters. Every four years our country is subjected to mind-numbing public debates that only expose how stupid the political candidates are, how totally corrupt such a government is, and how stupid we are for putting up with it.

We pay literally billions of dollars more each year for court services that we do not receive, and on the backside of it, we suffer pillaging, plundering and racketeering to the tune of billions more, to say nothing of the damage done in terms of lost jobs, lost property, broken families, and lost income, as these foreign courts run by the Bar Union deliberately misidentify Americans as Federal Citizens and attack them as "enemies" in a war that officially ended, and which we took no part in, over a century ago.

We, Americans, do not live in a "democracy". We live in fifty republican States of the Union.

The British Territorial democracy is subject to our lawful government and runs its concession on delegated authority, and if that is not true, then our run amok employees need to be fired, and the Trustees need to be arrested and subjected to public trials for treason, piracy, and conspiracy against the Constitutions.

And instead of worrying about Russia or China, we need all fire power we can get focused on London and Rome.

Anna von Reitz
8 hrs ·

The Truth About the Presidency

The American States properly constituted, polled, and assembled, have agreed that Donald John Trump meets all Constitutional requirements to become The President of The United States of America, and that he does represent the chosen President of the American People despite the defects of the underlying legal presumptions giving rise to the election process.

It is therefore deemed a matter of Good Faith with respect to those Americans who, however improperly identified through no fault of their own, have elected him, to honor their expressed Will, and also to express the Will of those members of the American People still present on these shores who have by a majority of States also approved his election, to announce that Donald John Trump of New York is qualified and elected to serve in the High Office of the Power Holder and as The President of The United States of America, if and when he throws off the chains which have hitherto bound him and accepts and adopts his birthright political status as a New Yorker and as Holder in Due Course of all Persons associated with his Good Name.

Upon his action declaring himself a New Yorker and accepting his Name and all Persons/PERSONS related to him as Holder in Due Course, free of any other ownership or obligation to Cede and Company, the State of New York, the STATE OF NEW YORK, the United Nations or any other foreign city-state, he is right-wise empowered to enter into The Office of The President of The United States of America by the American People, and is charged to direct the operations of all foreign subcontractors on our shores.

He is specifically and in public instructed that upon entering the Power Holder Office, he is to meet with the Electors within 90 days, and is to maintain the security and well-being of these States and these People without exception, including the prevention of any mercenary conflicts on our shores, the arrest of persons engaged in acts of commercial piracy and fraud, and the persons of those engaged in predatory and criminal activities aimed at children, the aged, and the infirm.

As President of The United States of America, he is empowered and entrusted to act as the day to day Chief Executive Officer of the American States and People, to direct the course of business in their behalf according to The Prudent Man Standard. His powers include the authority to discipline and impose the constitutionally established limitations upon all Federal Officials, Subcontractors and Agents.

We regret the circumstance that he has had to face and the fraudulent misrepresentation of Americans which has led to commercial interests gaining an improper control of our government and the promulgation of false claims in commerce against our citizenry. We further regret the gross breach of trust and insupportable actions of certain members of the Municipal House of Representatives.

We look forward to Mr. Trump's acceptance of the actual Power Holder Office and stand ready to guide him through the process necessary to attain that Office and to function as the actual American President.

Anna von Reitz
6 hrs ·

Practical Help for State Nationals

This is for those who have declared and recorded their proper political status as Joe Average Americans, and who are not Federal Employees or Dependents.

Federal employees and those who are actually receiving unearned welfare "benefits" have other options and other things to say "in-house" to the members of the Congressional Delegations.

For the rest of us, it is obviously necessary to light a fire under their collective rumps. There are many measures that we can take to compel these yahoos to perform and to clean up their own Mess. Writing a simple letter and flooding their offices with complaints about one supremely important topic --- the remedies you are owed --- is one way to do it.

We have begun a program to secure these remedies for Americans who have taken the time and made the effort to correct their political status.
Thus far, the Internal Revenue Service and "Treasury Department" are attempting to stonewall us and unreasonably restrict access to remedy. They need direction from their bosses --- the members of Congress; and we need to give the members of Congress their marching orders, too.

No need to be rude, just get your points across.

I will note that if you want to send an email to "YOUR" Congressional Delegation, most of their email programs require you to choose a "title" or "office" --- this is so they can pretend that you are actually agreeing to serve in such an office and are their employee, instead of being their employer.

As this is a "required field" go ahead and choose any "office" you wish--- then explain and disclaim this at the very beginning of your email to them. I usually choose "Marine Corps General" and then explain that I actually don't occupy any Office of Person, but was forced to choose one by the email program and so, chose "Marine Corps General" because that's how I feel ...

To help get you thinking and started, here's a sample of the kind of letter you --those who have declared their actual political status --- can write:

Dear Senate Delegates:
I have suffered multiple attempted acts of commercial piracy because you have failed to properly instruct Federal subcontractors concerning the exemptions that average Americans are owed and also failed to expedite the Mutual Off-set Credit Exchange I am owed. See Public Law 73-10.

Your failure to properly oversee and administer this process has led to the accumulation of the so-called "National Debt"--- a situation that must be corrected. It has also led to millions of Americans suffering unjustifiable foreclosures and allegations of federal tax debts that they don’t owe.

There is a Treasury Direct Account that was created in my name without my knowledge or consent as a result of FDR's Executive Order 2039. That "special trust account" is supposed to be used to off-set public debts and to hold me harmless as a [man/woman] who holds no Office of Person in the Federal or State of State Governments.

In the hard copy version that will follow this email, I am enclosing a letter to the Internal Revenue Service [or other agency, court, etc.] that I have been forced to send after a prolonged failure on their part to respond to me and continued harassment and false allegations of federal tax debts brought against Federal PERSONS that I never knowingly authorized to exist.

You will note that I have also been forced to file liens against the perpetrators and to "offer" to enforce commercial and legal sanctions against them. This is regrettable, because for the most part, they don’t know that they are doing anything wrong. They’ve been left in the dark like everyone else.

I consider the Courts and the out of control Federal Agencies to be at fault for this circumstance and even more so the banks and lending institutions including the USDA, but ultimately, I consider you all to be at fault for this inland piracy against average Americans who have not been given anything like “full disclosure” and who are left operating in the dark as a result of your continued failure to provide disclosure and failure to properly instruct your employees, including members of the court systems.

As you are choosing to perform in an undisclosed capacity as members of an "incorporated" government, I should also point out that you are yourselves without any protection of sovereign immunity and that the municipal plenary oligarchy you are serving is out of compliance with its charter --- that old-fashioned thing known as The Constitution of the United States.

We, Americans, will still be here, but the continued existence of "the" United States is another matter. The Pope issued your municipal charter and the States and People hold the other end of the string. Now that we are, by dint of our own efforts, aware of all the nasty things FDR did, we have taken appropriate action to declare our proper political status, organize the States of the Union, and prepare to finish the long, long overdue "Reconstruction" of the Federal Government.

If you have an interest in the well-being of this country and any shred of honor, it is well past time to take an interest in the malfunctioning of your subcontractors and the harm that your failure to properly instruct your own employees is causing to them and everyone else....
____________________

NOW, obviously, you have to tailor things to your own circumstance. If you haven't filed punitive liens, don't say you have. Put in your own information about whichever agency or agencies you have a beef with.

Make it clear that you are owed remedy and are being stonewalled and prevented from obtaining it by mis-informed Federal Employees.
Light a fire under them. Do so by the millions. They deserve it.

Anna von Reitz
1 hr ·

It is "Cognitive Dissonance"

Cognitive Dissonance occurs when new information doesn’t fit into our learned pattern of assumptions. Such information tends to bounce out of our minds, like a pin ball hitting a bumper.

The information I teach isn’t actually hard to understand. It’s not rocket science—- but it can feel that way because of Cognitive Dissonance and our built-in tendency to avoid, shut out, and if possible— ignore, whatever doesn’t fit neatly into our own conceptualization of the topic at hand.

How difficult is it to understand that the Reconstruction that was supposed to happen after the Civil War didn’t happen?

And an important part of our intended Federal Government has been missing ever since?

So we need to.get.organized and do the job, right?

What good does it do to drain the swamp, if you don’t also remove the dam that’s causing the problem in the first place?

We are missing the largest, most important, and only truly American portion of the Federal Government because the Reconstruction is still hanging.

This circumstance is what is causing the breakdown of accountability and discipline — it’s the dam creating The Swamp.

So let’s try to consciously move past the Cognitive Dissonance and into the clear light of new understanding.

Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 9:47 PM ·

More Practical Help for State Nationals -- Banking

In order to get by and thrive in life, you have to have a reasonable concern for "the other fellow" --- your family, your workmates, and yes, public employees, shopkeepers, veterinarians.... the list goes on. You also have to deal with bankers.

Most of the problems people are having with banks --- at least those that come over my desk --- are self-created and can be fixed just as quickly as they start.

Let's review some basics.

You are allowed by law to transact your business as you wish. You can, by law, use Federal Reserve Notes or United States Notes, either one. So, why not choose to use the lawful currency, United States Notes? This helps pay down the so-called "National Debt" and helps everyone in this country, including you.

The use of United States Notes presents a paper problem for the bank, because at any given time, most banks don't stock a lot of United States Notes, and they are worried that you are going to walk up to their cashier and want to cash out your account in United States Notes. If they ask, assure them that that is not your intention.

Not having enough United States Notes on hand could be a cause of embarrassment for the banks, or worse, cause people to think the bank is insolvent, etc., and cause a "bank run".

In reality, that is an extremely unlikely scenario, and denominating the funds in your accounts as United States Notes isn't actually the worry of the individual banks, because the government backs those denominated funds internationally as SDRs based on actual assets.

So, no actual worries for the banks, and you are, meanwhile, paying down the National Debt and making sure that your funds won't be subject to any bail-outs or bail-ins or other political shenanigans.

If your bank is edgy about your decision to denominate the funds in your accounts as United States Notes, just sit them down and explain what I just explained to you. Many small town bankers are not all that familiar with the currency laws and the use of United States Notes. Set them at ease.

Next point.....

There is no reason to be scared of using a Social Security Account Number when setting up a bank account. The banks use this information to insure against losses, but if they get caught doing anything inappropriate with your Social Security Account, they get fried and served for lunch.

Social Security Numbers function as both CUSIPS and AUTOTRIS account numbers. The familiar version with dashes is the CUSIP account set aside for making charges. The much-less familiar AUTOTRIS version without dashes is the credit side of things.

This is a direct demand account that FDR established "for" you without your knowledge or consent and dubbed a "special trust account" --- that you haven't known about or had access to. How convenient.

This "special trust account" was created by Executive Order 2039 and technically applied only to Municipal Employees....but via non-disclosure and fraud, the perpetrators entrapped almost everyone and then used it as the excuse to steal your name, your assets, your rights, and in many instances, even your lives.

That "trust account" is yours and it's time that you had the benefit of it.
So understand and make sure the bank understands that when they ask for your Social Security Number that they are asking for access to your trust account and to your Signature for their use as a rubber stamp---let them know that you are aware of what they are doing and that you will hold them individually 100% commercially liable if they do anything at all inappropriate with this information.

To clip their wings be sure to use a "byline" and "without prejudice" and a small copyright notice (a small "c" surrounded by a circle) when you sign the Signature Card.

That identifies that particular signature as your own unique creation and places it under your private copyright. That means that not only will they be fried and served for dinner if they mess with your account, they will be deep-fat fried.

With that caveat, go forth and conquer.

The exact verbiage to safely endorse the back of a check and denominate the funds in "lawful money" --- is:
By:_________________________ (c) All rights reserved. Redeemed in lawful money. 12 USC 411.

Please note that I don't have a copyright symbol in this program so the (c) above should actually be a small "c" that is completely encircled.

Use your Upper and Lower Case Signature to sign checks, like you were taught in school, and don't use any exotic punctuation or odd or inappropriate abbreviations like "ar" or "LS".
After all --- "ar" might mean "all rejected" or anything else at all, and "LS" --- "Living Soul" certainly doesn't belong on a check.

Also consider that if you were a bank and someone was placing a restriction on their signature using unknown abbreviations, you would have cause to be alarmed, too.

Just think about what you are doing and in which arena you are operating and play it straight. Most banks are aware of their fiscal responsibility to their customers and are only asking that you be reasonable and explicit --that is, honest, about what you are doing and what you expect of them in return.

So spell it out. Say, "All rights reserved." or "Without prejudice". That's perfectly okay for you to say or do and nobody should have any concern about that --- but "ar" or "wp" won't do.

Admittedly, if you get numerous checks you could get writer's cramp doing endorsements, so get a self-inking rubber stamp at a copy shop, and all you have to do is add your signature in ink.

Finally, you should be aware that there advantages to running your affairs as a small independent business which is "corporate" but not "incorporated". This places your business squarely in the realm of international trade, which offers you protections when conducting business with commercial (incorporated) corporations and makes it clear that you are not subject to commercial presumptions.

Ah, so. When a commercial corporation tries to attack you or seize your bank account they find it to be a much more difficult proposition. Most of them, including the IRS and other privateers prefer to go after lower hanging fruit.

If you are dealing with a commercial bank (most are) they will want you to have a business license when setting up an account, which is to protect them, not you. But having met that hurdle for a time, and presuming that you are conducting your business exclusively with lawful money, you can let the license lapse and operate as a truly private business, even though you are using the services of a commercial bank.

The commercial corporations can mess with their own script and control their own affairs and employees within reasonable limits. The transition from a licensed small business with limited commercial obligations to a private business functioning entirely in the realm of international trade should be viewed as similar to the transition when you move from one state or country to another.

Most banks are dependent on small businesses which by far employ the greatest number of people in any given community and which generate the lion's share of GDP. The last thing they want to do is drive your business away.

That said, the banks need to get their act together, too, and show you the care and respect that you deserve. If they treat you well and keep your accounts secure, they've done their job. If not, the pendulum swings and other alternatives must and will be sought.

I have a very handy reference on my desk that shows how to convert a "Federal" Credit Union into a State Credit Union --- and I am not talking about a "State of State" Credit Union, I am talking about an actual State Credit Union.

Credit Unions naturally belong in the realm of international trade and are perfect for the needs of average people and small businesses. Most of us would be well-served and well-advised to do most, if not all, of our business with credit unions as a result. We simply do not need the array of services and regulations associated with big commercial banks.

So just sit down for a few minutes out of your life and think seriously about what is best for you and for your country. How do you want to conduct business? What services do you need? How are you going to sign your checks? Which currency will you use? What impact does that decision have on your funds and accounts--- and on your country?

Although money and often, lack of it, consumes an inordinate amount of effort and concern in our lives, we are taught almost nothing about it in school ---- for the simple reason that what you don't know benefits crooks and leaves you more vulnerable to pirates.

When you think about the efforts that you make to earn money, doesn't it make sense that you should think about what money is? What credit is? What securities are? How banks work? How important is your signature? How can it be abused?

There are many questions that most Americans never ask and we really should --- for our own sake and the sake of our country, too.

Most people choose a bank at random. They go to that bank because their parents went to that bank, or because some high-flyer friend uses it, or because its on the way home. That's not the way to choose a bank.
Banks are run by people and you want a bank that shares your values and which offers the services you need.

For most of us, that means we want a bank that is operating under a State Charter and which has been in business for a long time serving people just like us.

Let's face it, most of us have no reason or need or ability to be transferring millions of dollars around the globe, so why would we take our business to one of the huge, glitzy commercial banks?

No. Most of us need a Mom and Pop bank or credit union, one that is locally chartered and controlled by actual people that we either know, or can get to know.

Most of the bankers I have met in my lifetime are extremely lonely people. Most of them really do care about their communities and their employees and the services they provide.

Within the weird world of a credit-debt currency system and double accrual accounting, they are doing the best they can.
And they love it when they get an "Attaboy!" or "Attagirl!"

So instead of treating your bank like a convenient public toilet, stop a moment and think about your bank. What do you really know about it? It's history? Who runs it? The laws and regulations that impact it?

If you have questions or concerns --- ask, discuss, learn. Most bankers are happy to share their expertise and will give good advice if they are asked.

As with any other human endeavor, you have Good Guys and Bad Guys.
So take the time to actually think about your bank and your banking needs and do some research and soul-searching. It's your money and your credit----and your life.

How do you want to conduct your business to best benefit yourself, your community, your country-- and your world-- as a whole?

Anna von Reitz
18 hrs ·

The Cards Are Called

We've had some real rats as Presidents. Gangsta quality guys. Robber barons. Even pukes like Slick Willie. There are no --- repeat, no, none, zero, zip, nada --- choir boys in the ranks of the Presidents. Number one, they can't be Candide and get that far, and number two, if they were all sweet and cuddly and a box of rocks, they'd make terrible Presidents.

The trick most of them employ is to: (1) look good; (2) say whatever people want to hear (Obama is an excellent example of this); and (3) follow the political maxim of "do whatever you want, so long as you don't get caught".

This means that in addition to not being Choir Members, most Presidents are tremendous hypocrites. Not all, but most of them, don't believe in or care about anything but money and power and how best to benefit themselves and their pals at the public trough.

That's why when someone like Trump comes in without a ticket, it upsets the whole DC Beltway Carnival.

Trump is not a Choir Boy, either.

The difference is that he is a really astute business man. And he's not nearly the world-class hypocrite that most US Presidents have been.

He actually sees --- and values --- the power and potential and beauty of America. He knows in his own terms what the "American Dream" is.
That's the truth about Donald Trump, as proven in the pudding he has served up over the last four years.

By their fruits you shall know them.

The American Dream runs counter to the Democrat Dream of controlling the work force via Labor Union bosses just like the Overseers on their beloved plantations.

Most people don't realize it, but the modern Democratic Party was birthed by largely German Communists who came here after the 1848 Worker's Rebellion and settled in my home state of Wisconsin. They were joined by the "traditional" Southern Democrats who were the remainders of the Southern elitists leftover after the Civil War. This unlikely marriage of what superficially appears to be radically different partners wasn't so strange after all.

It turns out that the Communists have a lot in common with the traditional Southern Democrats, though for wildly different reasons. Both groups are elitist. Both believe in deceit and that lying is an acceptable means to an end. Both readily adopt to either/or thinking patterns and use "pillar" to "post" control systems to divide and conquer. Both groups are hypocrites. Both believe in subjugation of the inferior masses -- while spieling the exact opposite message from both sides of their mouths.

Just so we are clear, I don't venerate either political party and I did not start my life despising the Democratic Party. Far from it.

I grew up in hardscrabble Black River Falls, Wisconsin, in a working class farm family and almost everyone I knew who bothered to vote --- was a Democrat. I considered myself a Democrat at one time and I continue to embrace many of the broad-minded egalitarian principles that the Democrats pretend to champion.

That's the problem.
They pretend to champion all these high ideals of caring about communities and working class people and sharing with the less fortunate and education for all ---and, as it turns out, the Democratic Party doesn't actually care about any of those things. The Democratic Party is ruled by thugs with connections to big crime syndicates and populated with staffers and wannabes too stupid to notice that all the rhetoric is fake.

Stone cold fake. And on purpose.

I had to learn that the hard way, by pouring through piles and piles of voting records on major issues and pieces of legislation that have been severely damaging to working class people and people of color.

I've got a tip for you -- in every case I examined, and that ran a gamut from the Civil War to 1973, Democrats created the evil legislation, spoke loud and long against it, and then, by wild margins, voted FOR it. In every single case.

I remember kicking back in my chair and staring at the ceiling of my college dorm room, feeling like I had been slapped up the side of the head. It was like the time I kept track of the "nightly news" stories for content and discovered that I was being fed a steady diet of stories about death and sex, and virtually nothing of use or benefit to me or anyone else.

So I turned off the Democratic Party like I turned off the Nightly News.
Back then, with all my youthful idealism intact, I thought Democratic politicians believed in the stuff they talked about.

It's only when you look at actual voting records-- at what the Democrats do, rather than what they say-- that the brutal truth shoves firmly into view.

This also explains why -- despite having super majorities for entire decades -- the slave-like, destructive welfare state has burgeoned into a huge population of people who are literally entrapped by the welfare system.

Entrapped, dependent, believing that there isn't enough of anything --- not enough money, not enough food, not enough of anything --- and that the only way to get more is to push for more welfare spending and more welfare programs.

It never occurs to them that they are being kept poor and dependent and miserable on purpose. And by the very people they believe are their champions.

Most people forget or miss the point that the government is in the business of providing services and that having a large captive population totally dependent on such services adds up to big profits for them and big meal tickets for bureaucrats---- and large dependent voting blocks for scumbag politicians who deliberately create poverty and break families and stifle job opportunities so that they have a big captive population to serve.

Thus, Black and Hispanic and other Minority voters put these rats into office year after year, decade after decade, vainly hoping for change and a better life, and never once realizing that their purported champions are the ones doing them the damage and keeping them down.

Like other Americans, Minority Voters don't check voting records and don't know the history of the Democratic Party. They don't read the horrible damaging legislation proposed by Democrats, then repudiated by Democrats, and then, quietly voted for ---- all by Democrats.

"Keep them hungry and keep them stupid." is the unofficial motto of the Democratic Party at the highest levels. Believe me, because I have been there in my younger days and no matter what they say or pretend, I would never go back again.

Don't believe me? Go look at the actual voting records on key topics.
Enfranchisement ---as in Dairy Queen enfranchisement. Electoral votes (actual voting rights) for women and people of color. Municipal corporations. Taxes. Abuse of Social Security funds. CPS. Land ownership. Marriage "licensing" laws. The Buck Act. And why in the Hell didn't they recognize the "Natural and Unalienable Rights" of colored people, instead of pulling yet another sleight of hand and offering "Civil Rights" instead?

If you are a rat, born to the breed, then you would find it deliciously amusing, just how easily misled and stupid American voters have been, and how many generations of us have taken politicians at their word and never checked their actual voting records and actual performance.

Let's finally get to FDR, the King Rat of them all.
I am going to quote the guts of Executive Order 2039 which created the perpetual private trusts on March 6, 1933 --- the very same day that the Conference of [Territorial ] State [of State] Governors "pledged" their "states and the citizenry thereof" as collateral for loans from the Municipal Government.

"....the Secretary of the Treasury, with the approval of the President and under such regulations as he may prescribe, is authorized and empowered (a) to permit any or all of such banking institutions to perform any or all of the usual banking functions, (b) to direct, require or permit the issuance of clearing house certificates or other evidences of claims against assets of banking institutions, and (c) to authorize and direct the creation in such banking institutions of special trust accounts for the receipt of new deposits which shall be subject to withdrawal on demand without any restriction or limitation and shall be kept separately in cash or on deposit in Federal Reserve Banks or invested-in obligations of the United States."

So, what are we really witnessing here?

At the Conference of Governor's meeting taking place that same day, FDR got the rats to "pledge" all the Territorial "citizenry" as collateral backing loans from the Pope.

The same day, "clearing house certificates" were allowed to be issued for "new deposits".

He's talking about birth certificates and the "new deposits" were American babies being deliberately misidentified as "United States Citizens" and used as literal bank collateral to fund the bankruptcy reorganization of "the" United States of America, Inc.

The Pope and the then-King are consolidating their operations on our shores, moving to run both sides of their Papist Commonwealth-Roman Municipal scheme under one consolidated governmental services corporation --- and all at our expense.

Think of it. You are the Pope and you are in the business of providing "governmental services". You have two levels of the American government under your control, one directly, and one indirectly. Well, of course, you want to reduce your costs and expand your services---and profits--- by doubling them up and expanding the range of services on offer.

So you hire, on our behalf of course, two guys to do the job of one, profit yourself from the labor of both, and charge the clueless American public for it.

Just go on the internet and do a search for something that should be simple --- like "Alaska Department of Natural Resources". What you will find is a multitude of such entities listed, all with slightly different names, different addresses, etc.

There's the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, the State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources, the Alaska DNR, and so on.

Now, you may think that these are all the same and all part of the same government, but they aren't. What you are seeing is the duplication for profit scheme in action---- a Territorial DNR, a Municipal DNR, a Regional (UN) DNR, a State Trust DNR....... and so it goes, the "government services" proliferating like a rapidly growing cancer.

And stupid people clamoring for more.

And of course, the "Legislatures" which are just elected Boards of Directors for these governmental services corporations, have no motive to stop it, so long as they can charge you for it and profit themselves at your expense.

Having created a completely redundant second or third or fourth set of workers, you can then use all the extra help for political and other profit making purposes.

The final details of the 1933 take-over transition were finished four years later in 1937 with the signing of The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States.

At least they had enough class back then to admit that they were "in" The United States.

I happen to have and to have securely archived an original signed copy of this document implementing Corporate Feudalism---which was handwritten on over-sized sheets of rag paper in India ink, like something from the Middle Ages.

Please notice that the main Issuer and Purveyor of the bonds related to FDR's Executive Order 2039 action was the Depository Trust Company (DTC) and that the underlying holding company in possession of the "deposits" --- i.e., Birth Certificate Applications, was Cede and Company --- all managed by the newly created Vatican Government (est. 1929).
Also notice that from FDR's side of the "New [Undisclosed] Deal" his profits from selling you into slavery and confiscating all your assets were poured into the Federal Reserve Banks and that "special trust accounts" were established in the names of all the "new deposits".

This is where "YOU" came in, along with the all the undisclosed escrow accounts siphoning off your money, the value of your labor, and your natural resources--- including your children.

When we started tracking it, the money trail led from DTC to the Vatican Bank (the Pope gets his share first) and then to the Bank of Canada (the Queen's "Commonwealth" share) and having been laundered through both these banks, the filthy loot of the Slave Traders comes back to the Mellon Bank (the share of the American traitors and their "progeny" --- mostly members of The Pilgrim Society) -----and finally, the remainder lands in the Federal Reserve Banks closest to wherever the victims were born.

All the lucre raised from selling "me" that was left after the scumbags took their shares is sitting in the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, under a CUSIP/AUTOTRIS "Social Security Number" and an account labeled: RIEZINGER, ANNA MARIA.

Please note that the habit of using all capital letters without hyphens between the words is known as "DOG LATIN" --- a venal script amounting to gibberish that was applied by the Roman Emperor Justinian to identify and defraud "tribal members" who were illiterate.

This slave operation has been going on a long, long time, but it is time for it to end, and for the outraged world to throw off the yoke of men who at best could be called criminals--- and also the institutions which have betrayed the trust and Good Faith of billions of people.

And there, right smack dab in the middle of the cradle of this stinking and reprehensible modern day enslavement and racketeering scheme, sits Pope Frances.

There are only two possibilities: (1) Frances is the Chosen One of the evil and rightfully suppressed "Holy Roman Empire" and he was, as is rumored, put in power by means of murder and blackmail; (2) Frances is the loyal Jesuit "Bag Man" for Pope Benedict XVI, who has taken a powder from public view, similar to Prince Philip who retired from public life two days after receiving $950 trillion dollars worth of "Life Force Value Annuities" belonging to us and the Canadians.

This is how, when, where, and by whom we were all secretively betrayed and the reason that we all have been treated as slaves and sucked dry by our public servants; and this is how slavery has been maintained in the modern world, right here in the land of the free and the home of the brave, since 1933.

This was done to us by FDR and the Democratic Party, which deserves to be outlawed as a crime syndicate--- up front, here and now, for sure.
I still have friends and family members who are Democrats and Catholics, both, and I love them dearly. If they knew what has been going on in their Party and their Church, they would be as sickened as I am.

They couldn't imagine such evil and deceit, lurking just underneath the surface of their government, their political party, and most of all, their church.

But the evidence is in, and the cards are called.

Yes, Julia, there were Republicans in the dog pile, too.
Teddy Roosevelt, FDR's Cousin, was an absolute promoter of the whole scheme, and a skilled and devious actor. His career was launched by the Robber Barons. He oversaw the First Bankruptcy of the Scottish Interloper doing business as The United States of America, Inc. and he established the foundations for the Federal Reserve System and did far more damage to this country than ten atom bombs----and he was a Republican.

But he was also a Roosevelt.
So we had Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, doing the set up, and we have FDR, a Democrat, doing the take down.
Among all the Players who have contributed to this seething cauldron of corruption--- the name "Roosevelt" needs to be etched in stone.
Rothschild means "Red Shield" and Roosevelt means "Red Field".
Go figure.

These men were so arrogant, so evil --- and so diabolically brilliant --- that they literally believed that the rest of us would never be able to figure it out.

Yet, there it is, all neatly dissected, decoded, and presented in a single paragraph of a single Executive Order issued back in 1933.

Let's outlaw the Democratic Party as a crime syndicate. And then let's abolish the Political Party System and the Federal Reserve System, too.
Lets make a clean sweep and all go home to America, where we don't have political parties, don't buy and sell babies as "new deposits", and are sick to death of all of this crap.

Anna von Reitz
December 23 at 1:30 PM ·

To a Bureaucrat in Wisconsin:

Here is an example of what you, too, can do to wake up the slumbering among us and "put it to" the members of the Bar Associations:

Sent to: DFI-UCC <DFI-UCC@dfi.wisconsin.gov>
December 23, 2019

Thank you. I am afraid that the only fraud being promoted is being promoted by the British Monarch and the Municipal United States Government, which has been condoning Unconscionable Contracting Practices and using them against unsuspecting Americans.

The root of this issue goes back to a specific Presidential Proclamation of Franklin Roosevelt (2039) issued on March 6, 1933.

The British Territorial United States Government corporation styling itself as the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia came ashore and secretively conscripted American doctors as "Uniformed Officers", and forced them on pain of losing their [Territorial] license to practice, to participate in this scheme which has compelled millions of innocent and trusting American women to sign undisclosed commercial contracts misidentifying their babies as British Territorial United States Citizens and also mis-characterizing themselves as "Informants".

This has then allowed the rats behind this scheme to seize upon our Given Names and our assets and to sell the same to the Pope, whose minions operating the Municipality of Washington, DC, then create all these ACCOUNTS "in our names" and use these to hypothecate bogus debts against American public and private property assets.

Your house and land and everything else you think you own has been seized as chattel backing their spending and you didn't even know it.

Your friends in the "legal department" are under a similar gun as the doctors. They are forced to belong to a foreign labor union --- a "guild" based in London --- and to have a Bar Card issued by the Queen to practice law in her British Territorial United States Courts.
Please tell them that I know exactly how this works and what their problem is and that they are going to have to understand mine.

And yours, if you are a typical American.

YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE is actually your "Death Certificate" ---- the American baby was, as a result of the undisclosed contracts being shoved off on our Mothers, "conveyed" into British Territorial jurisdiction. Your birthright estate as an American was unlawfully converted and instead of being marked down as a state national of Wisconsin ---which is what should have happened --- you were deliberately mis-identified as a Territorial "United States Citizen" and British Subject.

This unlawful conveyance which is, by the way, a capital offense under both the Hague and Geneva Conventions ---death penalty by hanging or firing squad--- resulted in the creation of what is termed an "infant decedent estate" -and because you purportedly "died" as an "abandoned" infant left on the doorstep of the hospital and "presumed to be" a British Territorial United States Citizen, of course, you "died" intestate, without a will.

That allows the "Attorney General" to determine everything about your estate as an American and dispose of your land and home and everything else however he wishes.

So the filthy Vermin decided to reap the fruits of their fraud scheme by using our American assets as collateral to back their debts.

They sell all our names "as" British Territorial "Citizens" to the Pope, who has them "deposited" as the same "new deposits" ---- American babies! --- referenced by FDR in his Presidential Proclamation and unlawfully conveys them --- again --- into Municipal United States jurisdiction and deliberately mis-identifies them a second time as Municipal CITIZENS responsible for paying all the debts of the Municipal United States Government.

This is all the most venal kind of international crime and slave marketing and genocide on paper imaginable----- and is is all being practiced against us by people who are (1) receiving their paychecks from our hands and (2) under contractual obligation to protect our Persons and (3) sworn to defend us against "all enemies" both foreign and domestic.

Tell your friends in the "Legal Department" that I accept and acknowledge via this email, which I will record, that they are all acting as Officers of the Queen, that they are all 100% commercially and personally liable for these practices and for any harm that comes to me and my non-existent "infant decedent estate" which is in fact my own estate and nobody else's, including my Mother's.

You may also tell them, if you will, that this "System" of things is at an end. The crime and the underlying constructive fraud that has resulted in the existence of all these "registered properties" and being manipulated by the Bar Associations "in the name of" living Americans ---- has at long last been tracked down to its source. And it has all been nothing but purposeful fraud resulting in Odious Debt being "hypothecated" ---- "in theory" ---- against my assets and being claimed against me in real life. They all have a choice now.

They can either honor their actual duties owed to me and my decidedly "non-decedent" estate and get busy and correct the "mistake" regarding the registration of my name --- "Anna Maria Riezinger" which has not been corrected despite my Mother's repudiation of her purported "donation" standing on the books of the Jackson County Registrar, and despite my properly Witnessed instructions to the Clark County Registrar.

And they may inform the Wisconsin Attorney General that is is not his privilege or the Queen's to deprive or defraud any Wisconsinite in this manner and they can shift their rumps to put a stop to these practices and to get this Mess straightened out and my Good Name conveyed back into its proper and original jurisdiction and myself and my assets Held Harmless.

Because, of course, neither my Mother nor I, nor--- most likely, you, ----have ever been given full disclosure about any of this phony baloney going on behind our backs, and because in the course of my life I created and adopted a Pen Name, Anna von Reitz, my situation is even more complicated.

They have not only "presumed upon" my Given Name, they have done the same with my Pen Name, and with an infinity of permutations, orderings, styling, punctuation and other variations and so called "Municipal DERIVATIVES" thereof, including ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER, ANNA M RIEZINGER, ANNA RIEZINGER, ANNA VON REITZ, ANNA M.REITZ, ANNA VONREITZ, ANNA M RIEZINGER-VON REITZ, and Anna Von Reitz and Vonreitz, Anna M., and Reizinger-VON REITZ, Anna Maria, and so on and so on and so on......

This is all the fault of your pals in the Legal Department not doing their duty owed to Americans including, most likely, you ---- and standing there like dumbshits, living in fear of losing Bar Cards. Would they rather be charged with conspiracy against the Constitution? Would they rather be hauled up in international court for violation of the Geneva and Hague Conventions? Would they rather have me charging their ACCOUNTS, instead of the purportedly pre-paid TAX ACCOUNTS and Federal Reserve Bank ACCOUNTS operating as CUSIP and AUTOTRIS ACCOUNTS set up "for" me as "special trust accounts" ---to quote King Rat FDR---- ? Or would they like to clean this crap up "for" me, instead?

I am a reasonable American Person. I realize that we owe the governmental services corporations for services performed; however, I also realize how much those same governmental services corporations owe to me and to other Americans and I am fully aware that their perpetual bankruptcies and their decision to operate in such a deplorable and criminal manner is not my responsibility. It's theirs.

So. Please, by all means, light a fire under the tails of the members of your Legal Department for me. It's about time somebody did so. If any of them are ex-Service Members, remind them of the Oath they took and which I accept ---- to protect and defend "the Constitution"--- which includes their obligations to American State Citizens and the requirement to protect American babies against all enemies BOTH foreign and domestic.

Most Sincerely,
Anna Maria Riezinger (et alia!)
_____
I am going to sign and record this along with a screen shot as part of a UCC Lien and "Testimony in the Form of an Affidavit".

Anna von Reitz
2 hrs ·

Actual Answers -- Listen Up, Michael Savage, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh....

Okay, let's begin with the fact that I stopped listening to conservative talk radio about the same time I stopped listening to Mainstream Media.

I stopped listening to Mainstream Media because I proved, scientifically, that I was being fed a steady diet of "news" about sex and death, none of which I could do anything about, and none of which had any practical benefit for me.

So, instead of feeling depressed and anxious, I turned the dial and started wondering: "What possible benefit do these scags get from feeding people useless stories about sex and death?"

The situation with Talk Radio is somewhat similar. After six months of analyzing Michael, Mark, and Rush--- I came to the unavoidable conclusion that these guys are great at asking questions, but don't offer answers.

Maybe they can't talk about actual answers and still keep their broadcasting license?
So, again, I turned the dial.

They may have some use in prodding people to ask questions about government issues, but.....that's like encouraging an interest in gingivitis without discussing bacteria and oral hygiene.

Oh, gee, my gums are bleeding......
And...... (dead silence).

For me, staring at my navel ended in High School. Picking the lint out has continued unabated ever since.

So here are the THREE BIG BLOCKBUSTER PIECES OF INFORMATION THAT ALL THESE GUYS DON'T TELL YOU:

1. The way all the rats are getting around respecting your Constitutional guarantees is by redefining who you are and they are using simple semantic deceit to do it.

As an American State National you are owed all your guarantees and respect for your Natural and Unalienable rights. You can also act as a State Citizen of The United States and hold the rats to their obligations.

So they "redefine" you and "mistake" you as--- instead---- a "United States Citizen" ---- as if you were born in Puerto Rico, instead of Bangor, Maine.

And they also contrive to mistake you as a "citizen of the United States" --- as if you were a "US Corporation" chartered in Washington, DC.

These other "citizens" have no Constitutional guarantees or protections. At best, the "United States Citizens" have "Equal Civil Rights".

Wake up, People ---- what are these "Civil Rights" supposed to be "Equal" to?

They are supposed to be equal to your Natural and Unalienable Rights, but they aren't, because they are conferred on you by the Congress and what Congress gives, Congress can take away---- as opposed to Natural and Unalienable Rights which are the free gift of Nature and Nature's God.

Because you don't know the verbiage and don't know what they are alleging about you and so--- you don't protest and deny their allegations--- they get away with this sleight of hand.
And they use it to infringe on your right to keep and bear arms, your right to travel where you please, and your right to have custody of your own children and on and on and on.

It's all because you, a State Citizen of The United States, have been "mistakenly-on-purpose' misidentified as a British Territorial "United States Citizen" or a Municipal United States "citizen of the United States".

And you have been kept in the dark and unable to rebut these Legal Presumptions until now.

So there's Answer Number One.
Get off your rumps and draw the line for your employees, so that they are no longer able to impersonate you and deny you your guarantees and seize upon your property and put you in jail for "regulatory infractions" and taxes that only apply to them.

Ready for Number Two?
2. Both Political Parties practice the Hegelian Dialectic.
What to ____ is that, you may say?

It's a simple but ugly step-by-step process.
First, you create a problem.
Second, you stomp around and complain about the problem you created.
Third, you offer a solution to the problem.
Fourth, you get chosen to implement the solution, which gives you political power.
Fifth, you solve the problem you created, and spawn four or five new problems.

In this way, you dupe your victims into thinking that you are their savior and indispensable to them In Washington, DC, and as long as you can create problems, you can keep your seat.

Here is a real life example.

1. The Federal Government Corporation creates a fraud scheme that allows them to make false commercial claims against the assets of your County; [They create the problem.]

2. This leaves your County unable to pay its bills and leads to widespread unemployment and misery in the cities within your County; [They decry the problem--- the poverty, the unemployment, etc. --- that they created..]

3. LBJ offers "Federal Block Grants" as assistance to your County --- these are kickbacks from the racketeering and fraud that took place in Step One; [They present the solution to the problem they created and with much fanfare unveil the new Federal Program.....]

4. Your County takes the bait, gets a share of the payola, and starts functioning as a dependent franchise of the criminal Federal Government Corporation; [Your County Officials are snookered into participating in the fraud and racketeering and think that the Federal Government has "saved" the County, because they don't realize that the Feds created the problem in the first place.]

5. LBJ and other Perpetrators are regarded as heroes instead of as villains, and they are rewarded for their bad deeds, thus encouraged to continue on in the same manner....and all the clueless grateful "voters" continue to put these con men into office.

That's the way this really works --- the sleazy politicians are ultimately rewarded for creating problems, not for solving them. So guess what?

They, themselves, create an endless avalanche of problems that would not otherwise exist.
They create poverty. They create unemployment. They create broken families. They create environmental disasters. They create wars. They create bad food, bad drugs, bad medical care practices.

They are profiting from all the problems they create, so they just create more.

Ready for Number Three?
3. All the evils and ills in the world require Middlemen, and Middlemen are thus purposefully inserted into every program and process you can imagine.

The IRS is a Middleman. The Banks are all Middlemen. The Defense Contractors are Middlemen. The Arms Dealers are Middlemen. The Insurance Companies are Middlemen. The Tax Assessor is a Middleman. The Corporate Politicians are all Middlemen. The Human Resources Departments are all Middlemen. The CPS Agents are Middlemen. The LEOs are all Middlemen. The Judges are all Middlemen...... and yes, the priests in the Roman Catholic Church are all Middlemen, too.

They all insert themselves and stand in the middle, and profit themselves by doing so.
Everywhere you look, in every system of society that you examine closely, you will find the same thing:

We live in a complex, responsive, morphogenic information matrix that we ultimately control via the net result of our combined thoughts and feelings.

Naturally, we should seek what is good for ourselves and our families, right?

Whatever gives us the greatest pleasure and health and well-being should be instantly reflected in the world around us.

Instead, what happens?
The "Governments" of the world, operating under the principles exposed in Actual Answer Number 2 above, insert Middlemen into the process, and use these Middlemen to distort and up-end and reverse results.

You wish for peace and plenty, but they get in the middle and send out the false information that you want war and deprivation, instead.

So you get war and deprivation, because these Middlemen messed with the signal. And most of the time, they don't even know what they are doing.

The knowledge about this is kept compartmentalized, so that Middleman A doesn't know what Middleman B is doing.

And, you, of course, are left standing there shaking your head thinking ---- WTF? I ordered up a heaping helping of peace and plenty, and I get war and disaster, instead?

Well, yes, that is exactly what happens because the "mirror" is being distorted and reverse imaged like a Fun House mirror.

And it is being done deliberately, with malice aforethought, without your knowledge and without your consent, and even without --- generally speaking --- the knowledge of the Middlemen implementing the distortion.

And all for the profit and curiosity of men like Elon Musk and Bill Gates and mad scientists and even crazier politicians who have lost all sense of morality and who propose to "Play God". Literally.

About thirty years ago, these same Players unleashed "Mindbox" technology on the world and along with it, the weird world of "MERS" and the "BEAST" system in Belgium.

Now, they have tinkered and added more layers of Middlemen and found out more scientific information that they are exploiting as A1 technology to control your thoughts, which control your emotions, which together form the basis of reality for the entire planet.
If they succeed and are not brought down, they will create a world of unspeakable horror.
As a result, both the kingpins in Silicon Valley and their off-shoots in China have to be brought down, their patents cancelled, and their ability to profit --in any way-- from their evil Middleman technology, put to an end.

The simplest temporary solution is to render their physical bodies inoperable, and destroy their broadcast and AI Middleman programs. This can be done using conventional and unconventional Special Forces.

The second quickest and ultimately most efficient (and longer-term answer) is to overwhelm their distortion with positive thoughts and emotions.

This may require us to "suspend belief" in the ugliness surrounding us and to consciously generate thoughts and feelings of peace and plenty to countermand and correct the message they are sending.

It may also require us to become truly conscious and resistant to their interference with our brain waves and their attempts to create "second brains" within our neurological framework.

We can do this simply by telling our brains not to obey outside subliminal programming that we do not consciously know about and approve of. To create such a subconscious "command" simply repeat the instruction over and over in at a variety of times and circumstances, but especially at bed time and when you first wake in the morning:

"I do not accept subliminal programming from Artificial Intelligence and Broadcast Sources."

This is the equivalent of building a "Firewall" against external Artificial Intelligence and Broadcast manipulation of your neural network.

This is for real, folks. Listen up, Mike, Mark, and Rush.

Google, Facebook, Neuralink Sued for Weaponized AI Tech Transfer, Complicity to Genocide in China

Anna von Reitz
15 mins ·

Straight Talk for Tony, From Ernest and Me.....

Get serious, guys. Here is why [the Democrats didn't impeach Obummer for his crimes.]
Antonio Gramsci, Karl Marx,and Freud combined plans to destroy western culture. It's called: Cultural Marxism=Political Correctness.

They formed a plan to implement this scheme in Frankfurt, Germany. Hence, the Frankfurt "School" and the Frankfurt Plan. [This is really old news--- so old you might have missed it.]

The Frankfurt School's Eleven Point Plan.

1) The Creation of racism offenses. [Remember how everyone was dubbed a "racist" by the Demon-c-rats?]

2) Continual change to create confusion. [Do you feel like you are in a Mix Master?]

3) The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children. [Uh-huh]

4) The undermining of schools and teachers authority. [CPS comes in and steals your kids if you discipline them and its worse for teachers. Yep.]

5) Huge immigration to destroy identity. [So.....what has already happened in Europe and trying to happen here?]

6) The promotion of excessive drinking. [And drugging, too.]

7) Emptying of churches. [By undermining their credibility and commandeering their leadership and assets.]

8) An unreliable legal system with bias against crime victims. [Oh, boy, you think???}

9) Dependency on the state or state benefits. [How many people on the dole after Obummer cut their jobs and increased their cost of living?]

10) Control and dumbing down media. [Watch five minutes of any "news" program. Check to see if you heard any actual news.....]

Okay, anyone out there got any questions? Pope Francis is an avowed Cultural Marxist, which means he has no culture in mind at all, just destruction of everything, as outlined above.

The Roman Catholic Church has got to get rid of him and the Cardinal Bishops supporting him, or the whole world as we know it will blow.

And they, the Roman Catholic Church, will go up in smoke, right along with everything else.

The RCC will be destroyed and all the other churches that have been dumb enough to incorporate themselves in order to avoid taxes they were already exempt from.

So to all Americans reading this and all members of churches, especially the Roman Catholic Church --- there IS a reason why all this crap is happening, and we all now officially know what it is. It has a name: Cultural Marxism.

So, too, our mission is to destroy "Cultural Marxism" at its roots --- to attack it and its reason for being, and attack anyone caught espousing it, high or low on the totem pole. From the Pope on down. Right or left. Rich or poor. They have to go.

And it is not negotiable. Either we stand up for ourselves and for our culture, or these closet Anarchists will destroy all culture and leave the people of the Earth with nothing --- no framework, no agreed upon standard of morality, nothing.

Nancy Pelosi and all her little pals have to go. The sooner the better. Time for the rest of us to move into her district and go door to door and talk to people about what she is doing in their names----and see how long she lasts on Capitol Hill.

Let's target The Big Bitch and send her to you-know-where politically.

Let's put the hammer down and expose, expose, expose so that every drunk and dumb cluck in this country knows what "Cultural Marxism" is and knows how they and their country have been targeted. And by whom and by what.

Anna von Reitz
19 hrs ·

RINOs, DINOs, Dip-Critters All

For the last several days I have been explaining Political Basics for Neophytes --- like the fact that politicians create problems deliberately, because they get rewarded for solving (or appearing to solve) the problems that they create.

I told you all about my discovery (in college) of Democratic Party Voting Records on key "social progress" issues --- like actual Electoral Voting rights for blacks and women, like actual Natural and Unalienable Rights being recognized for blacks and women, like Freedom of Speech, like disclosure of the 'New Deal', and on and on.

In every single case I examined, here is what I found:
Democrats loudly decrying the evils of inequality and prejudice against the working class and colored people, while secretly legitimizing and voting for inequality, and at the same time, undermining and taxing the working class to death to buy votes and create slush funds for themselves.

Indeed, what I found is that the Democratic Party almost uniquely legislated FOR inequality and enslavement of the working classes and colored people they pretend to champion.

For just one stunning example:
When black people in this country stood up and demanded to be treated like everyone else --- which I understand to mean that they wanted their "Natural and Unalienable Rights" recognized --- what did the Democrats do? They offered--- and passed off --- "Equal Civil Rights", instead.

And Equal Civil Rights can never be "equal" because they are granted by the Congress and can be taken away by the Congress, whereas Natural and Unalienable Rights are given as a gift to us by Nature and Nature's God.

They pulled a Bait and Switch, and when MLKJ discovered it, they killed him.

I could go on at least half a day and type as fast as I could and show you case after case after case where the hypocrites pretended to champion the rights and interests of poor people, working people, colored people ---- and in fact, the Rats were busily creating and passing legislation to undermine, enslave, abuse, and harm the same groups.

Believe it, because it's true. I had no ax to grind with the Democrats when I discovered this stuff. In fact, at the time, I considered myself a Wisconsin Democrat, born and bred. You can imagine how repulsed and disillusioned and disgusted I was back in 1973 --- and still am.

Their party name should be amended to "Demon-c-rats". Nobody should ever vote for them. Ever. Least of all the traditional voting blocks that support them.

Recently, I have been asked about Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski and her apparent waffling about the Trump Impeachment issues.

Well, short answer-- the Dems are being identified as "the" problem, as they deserve to be, and so they are deliberately infiltrating the Republican Party and pretending to be Republicans.

Why not? If they can stand there and pretend to champion the rights of the poor while sticking the poor in the back, why not pretend to be a Republican and continue to do the same things?

And right here in River City, in my backyard, is a darn good example of this.
In answer to the question about Senator Murkowski's "waffling" ----
Lisa Murkowski is a RINO's RINO [Republican in Name Only]---- her Dad was US Senator before her, a banker, and husband to Nancy Gore ----- as in Al Gore. Same family. Related to the Daley Clan in Chicago. She's no more a "Republican" than FDR.

People are so stupid to elect these shills and then think that they are going to keep their word and act according to the advertising. I told everyone what I discovered about Democrat voting records, no? Talk one way and vote the other? Time after time after time.
Same thing with Lisa's voting record, too.

And when I called her on a particularly evil example of this in action, all the Brain Dead Republicans in Alaska flew at me like crows on a road kill.

You would have thought that I had killed their dog and maimed their cat. They are so dumb that they trust in the name "Republican" instead of paying attention to the fact of the Voting Record.

No wonder the Voters are "confused", right? You've got Democrats claiming to be Republicans and loudly proclaiming their support for workers and poor people ---- and then creating legislation that undermines and enslaves both.

We all have a right to feel "confused" ---- and betrayed, and angry to the bone.
And thanks to Democrats camouflaging themselves as Republicans and Republicans being too dumb to ferret them out, we have this same kind of game going on and being promoted by what appear to be members of both Political Parties.

That is, Lisa isn't really a GOP Senator "waffling" about Trump's bogus Impeachment charges. She's a Dem in GOP clothing waffling about Trump's bogus impeachment charges.

Everyone needs to wise up, but nobody needs to wise up more than the traditional Democratic voters.

Recently, there has been an "awakening" and many Democrats have joined the "Walk Away" Movement and exited, Stage Left, the Democratic Party and Voting Block. I would suggest that a "Run Away" Movement would be more appropriate.

Run like an antelope away, and keep a sharp eye out for Dems pretending to be Republicans, too.

Here's how I would begin "the Hunt" on Nancy Pelosi's House Seat: I'd take a photo of her big walled mansion, and I'd make a one-page leaflet of it and here's what the leaflet would say: "Here's where Nancy Pelosi lives. You really think she "represents" you?"

And I would paste and plaster that leaflet all over her filthy dirty, run-down, miserable, low-class, semi-slum Voting District.

Hello, Slum Dwellers. You think this woman is one of you? You think she cares? Really? Let's examine that belief.....

And then I would go door-to-door and actually talk to people. I'd give them a copy of the Frankfurt Plan of the Cultural Marxists and ask them to look around at their world and her voting record.

I'd ask why --- after decades of supporting Nancy Pelosi, and despite her rise to power in Washington, DC, ---conditions in her home district have only --and steadily--- gotten worse?

Fewer decent jobs, more decayed housing, more garbage in the streets, but trillions of dollars belonging to US Taxpayers being spent in other places on other things?

And all this being done on your ticket?
Still believe that Nancy Pelosi "represents" you?
No, she does not, and Lisa Murkowski doesn't represent me.

So why are they still in Washington, DC, pretending that they do?
Mainly, it's the gullibility of Republicans (allowing RINOs in their party) and American Voters in general that allows this situation to go on.

People don't seem to understand that it is their money being spent in DC and that its being spent on everything and everyone but them

Anna von Reitz
5 hrs ·

You Are Daniel Daley

Pretend for a couple minutes that you are a man called Daniel Daley and this is your story.
As a young man, you start a company, and for lack of more imagination, you call it: The Daniel Daley Company. It's a big success and people use your company's services all the time.

Then you go on a business trip and are lost at sea.
Your affairs are left in the hands of your business partners. They decide (in your absence) to incorporate The Daniel Daley Company under a Scottish-issued charter and Articles of Incorporation very similar to your original business plan and mission statement--- except of course, that an incorporated entity is owned by the government issuing its charter and is eligible for bankruptcy protection and is subject, in turn, to Scottish law.

This process of incorporation turns your private business into a public business. All the assets that The Daniel Daley Company owned are "converted" into assets owned by The Daniel Daley Company, Incorporated.

And instead of being a private American Company operating in the realm of international trade, your business is now operating as a Scottish Corporation in the realm of global commerce.

Now, your friends, the Board of Directors, who are doing all this "for" you, in your absence, don't really have any permission to do any of this, but because they don't have any real authority they also don't have any accountability.

They claim to represent you and since you aren't present to nix their activities and nobody really questions their claims, they get away with it. They figure you are dead, so whatever they do is their business, and they can do whatever they wish with The Daniel Daley Company, Incorporated.

So, that's what they do. They use your company's assets to capitalize the Scottish Corporation, then they run up huge bills against your Good Name and credit---- so huge that they finally have to seek bankruptcy protection and liquidation.

They, your erstwhile buddies, have become very rich off this process. So rich that they decide to take another spin. So, without missing a beat, they go to the State of Delaware, and open up another corporation named --- you guessed it --the Daniel Daley Company, Inc., reinvest the profit they made off the first bankruptcy, and do the same thing all over again.

The only difference between the Scottish Corporation and the State of Delaware Corporation is that the little word "the" is made part of the corporation's name in Scotland: The Daniel Daley Company, Inc, and the Delaware version is: Daniel Daley Company, Inc.
These names look very similar on paper and are indistinguishable in conversation, so people easily mistake one for the other, and they also mistake these corporations for your original company and also begin to just shorten the name in common parlance to "Dan Daley", like this:

"The Dan Daley took a hit at the trade conference."

"We'll make the Dan Daley into a tourist destination."

"The Dan Daley will succeed in its bid to take over Amazon."

The years flow by. And one day a passing ship sees you sitting on your desert island, picks you up, and before you know it, you are in New York again. The world has changed.
You've changed. Your old friends don't recognize you anymore. But everyone knows your name.

You are aghast at what your "friends" have done to your Good Name and your Company. You go to them and say----WTH? And they say, "Uh, well, uh...."

So you invoke your ownership rights and move to extract all your assets from the incorporated version back into the original company structure, and you have just begun this process when another bankruptcy hits, so now you are dealing with the Bankruptcy Trustees and they don't know who you are from Adam.

They look at you and they remark, "This guy's name is Daniel Daley. Weird coincidence, right?"

You explain that it isn't a "coincidence" at all, that in fact the original company and the later corporations were all named after you, and that these run amok organizations and all their assets actually belong to you.

And there you stand, Daniel Daley, Original Issuer, Holder in Due Course, Primary Priority Creditor, Assignor of the whole messed up shebang ---- and nobody knows what to do.
All the debts run up by the purported "secondaries" to your company and estate can't be attached to you or to assets actually belonging to you, because the secondaries had no authority to act for you in the first place and neither the Scottish Government nor the State of Delaware had any authority to convert your assets, either. So.....

The actual assets have to go back to you, the debts incurred "in your name" and against your estate have to be discharged as Odious Debts, and all of this creates vast confusion because "Dan Daley" has become a household word, yet nobody knows which "Dan Daley" or "Daniel Daley Company" we are talking about at any given moment.

This is the situation --- unfortunately --- with both "the US" and "the USA".

Just plug in "United States" or "United States of America" for "Dan Daley" and see what you will see.

It's the same story. The same Mess.

The Queen and the Pope and their minions staffing the various "Congresses" in DC are synonymous with the reckless friends who took over and ran "The Daniel Daley Company" ---purportedly "for" you.

And now it is up to you to step back into your own shoes, assert your rights and interests as the actual owner, and sort this mess out ---- for your own sake and for the sake of everyone else in the world.