Coronavirus

https://deeprootsathome.com/andrew-hills-stunning-video-admission/






Andrew Hill’s Stunning Video Admission: He Skuttled Ivermectin For Money

7.7KViews Modified: Mar 7, 2022 · Published: Mar 5, 2022
By Jacqueline 6 Comments

https://media.deeprootsathome.com/wp...1-1000x523.png

What is your life worth? What is your loved one’s life worth? Is there a dollar value would you place on your child, your mother, father, or spouse? When the world experienced an average of nearly 15,000 COVID deaths per day, Dr. Andrew Hill decided on the price of a human life. Dr. Hill made that calculation during a conversation with Dr. Tess Lawrie, in January of 2021, during the peak of the Winter Surge.

In the following stunning zoom conversation between Dr. Tess Lawrie and Dr. Andrew Hill, then the most influential Ivermectin advocate in the world, Dr. Hill chose dollars over human lives.

It’s been a year since Andrew Hill’s paper taking down Ivermectin was published. It’s been a year since Dr. Lawrie recorded the video call in which Andrew Hill admitted his shocking conflict of interest.

Now, a year later, Tess Lawrie, a world-class researcher and former consultant to the WHO, powerfully exposes the take down of Ivermetin:

A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill | Dr Tess Lawrie | Oracle Films

“The story of Ivermectin has highlighted that we are at a remarkable juncture in medical history. The tools that we use to heal and our connection with our patients are being systematically undermined by relentless disinformation stemming from corporate greed. The story of Ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.” ~Dr. Tess Lawrie

Had Ivermectin been employed in 2020 when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end.”

Dr. Lawrie went on, “Since then, hundreds of millions of people have been involved in the largest medical experiment in human history. Mass vaccination is an unproven novel therapy. Hundreds of billions are being made by Big Pharma and heavily paid for by the public. With politicians and other nonmedical individuals dictating to us what we are allowed to prescribe to the ill, we as doctors, have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack.”

Ivermectin has 81 randomized controlled studies involving tens of thousands of patients showing reduced time to viral clearance, hastened recovery time, and reduced mortality. On the other hand, the vaccine lobby’s choice, Remdesivir, was rejected by the WHO as a drug that failed to improve survival and actually contributed heavily to the numbers of deaths.

Note: Shockingly, Studies Show Ivermectin Is A Safe, Potent Cancer Fighter

One thousand doses of Ivermectin can be purchased online (and without a prescription from India) for under $200. Yet, UNITAID paid $40 million to change Dr. Hill’s conclusions to call for more studies [delaying Ivermectin approval], essentially condemning millions of human beings to death from COVID-19. So while 90 cents may be the price of life, it seems that twenty pieces of silver remains the price of death.

“As steel is forged in a blast furnace, the best in humanity can only arise out of its cruelest chapters. Oskar Schindler, a Nazi, gave away all his wealth to safeguard vulnerable Jewish people out of harm’s way, away from the gas chambers. Oskar devoted his life at significant personal risk to saving others less fortunate; this is perhaps the fundamental principle of humanity.” ~Dr. Justice R. Hope, MD

Many thanks to The Highwire and their friends at Oracle Films for helping Dr. Lawrie send her message to Dr. Andrew Hill.

“For there will be no future for the evil man; The lamp of the wicked will be put out.” ~Proverbs 24: 20

**For the FULL PROTOCOL (including NAC) to protect from transmission from the “V” and to help those who took the “V”, go here.

Quote:

---

Dr. Hill’s conclusions to call for more studies [delaying Ivermectin approval], essentially condemning millions of human beings to death from COVID-19.

---

Dr. Hill’s conclusions to call for more studies [delaying Ivermectin approval], essentially condemning millions of human beings to death from murder by physicians.

COVID-19 IS BS/FLU'S NEW NAME

The big mystery reality in the PLANdemic is some people who have not been "vaccinated" did become very ill with an pneumonia-like illness. In fact, that illness mainly stuck older people. The doctors and scientists have never identified that illness and it cannot be said that it was actually one illness. No specific pathogen was ever identified.

All the doctors and the scientists were content to accept that is was the "virus" called "SARS-CoV-2" that manifests as "COVID-19." There was never any scientific or medically specifically identified pathogen to warrant just accepting the "COVID-19" narrative or story.

That mysterious illness could have been caught or contracted in something other than or in addition to an airborne contagious pathogen or pathogens.

Dr. Lee Merritt is the only doctor I have read and listened to who gives adequate attention to the way of spreading an illness called "shedding." (I heard Dr. Merritt say recently that little girls as young as age 2 are experiencing uterine bleeding.) Technically it is only a "true virus", if there is such a thing, that can spread by "shedding." But we cannot be bound by those old understandings. This mysterious illness was created and designed to break all the rules and to cause impossible confusion to any doctor or honest scientist.

It is amazing to me how the entire medical establishment wholesale just ran with the COVID story when any thinking person that whole story was just part of the quality of medical news reporting that is spewn via mainstream media and "The View."

The gnawing nonsensical nature of this whole story is the exact same nonsensical nature of the many "false flag" events of the last many decades on US and foreign soil, effected for political purposes to either start a war or install some new anti-basic freedom authoritarian / totalitarian clampdown on the people.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....e-e1dac9c4bbac

March 11, 2022
CHD Weekly Q&A
CHD Q&A Episode 21

[IMG]https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdefault.salsalabs.org%2F144 bf869-093a-49bc-

b7ce-e1dac9c4bbac%2Fb35f5b46-09af-4299-bf1b-30927e17ea98.png&t=1647163491&ymreqid=cfc662b2-355b-9549-1c32-cd0016011400&sig=rhF7XD4s0.DvGtkIWXMFJg--~D[/IMG]

Madhava Setty, M.D. was the guest on this regular weekly show of Children's Health Defense.

At about 57:10 on this video track Dr. Setty said ...

"The vaccine and the virus are doing the same thing."

He employs the terms "vaccine" and "Virus" because he is communicating to laymen, the general public, and indeed those are handy terms.

But he was communicating an important truth. The symptoms and pathology of both vague entities on the sick humans who have "caught" "this mysterious illness" are acting on the human body in often the exact same ways.

That makes an important point. They are acting in similar ways on the human body perhaps because these mysterious entities come from a same artificial man-made, man-created source. That common nature speaks to the "origin" of whatever it is that we call "COVID" or "the virus." This is not a "zoonotic" or natural origin of the mysterious illness or illnesses. This "virus" did not jump from an animal to a human so that all of sudden this "virus" is contracted and spread by humans. Not so. And all of us have had this gnawing suspicion all along.

The nature of this serious respiratory illness or these illnesses is to my mind EVIL. Created by EVIL men with EVIL motivations and money and profit are not the sole motivations. The age-old goals of the secret societies for worldwide massive population reduction is the bottom-line motivation. Lesser other motivations to impose authoritarian governmental controls on people, such as, "gun control", Second Amendment destruction, are serious and real but those are just to facilitate killing off large numbers of population and having the gullible masses not have a clue.

What is going on in "biological research laboratories" to use Victoria Nuland's term in Ukraine and Wuhan and probably in other countries like Taiwan and of course, the USA and Canada, are part of this DIABOLICAL age-old plan.

Apocalypse 6:8 (kill off one fourth of the world population)

[8] And behold a pale horse, and he that sat upon him, his name was Death, and hell followed him. And power was given to him over the four parts of the earth, to kill with sword, with famine, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

and

Apocalypse 9:15 (kill off one third of remaining population)

And the four angels were loosed, who were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year: for to kill the third part of men.

Nun sues DC over being denied 'vax mandate religious exemption'

Mar 11, 2022

4:20 video runtime

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXZNiI0bE3I

Sister Deirdre Byrne, suing over the vax mandate, tells Laura Ingraham she treated 400 or more people and had success with keeping people out of the hospital, and doesn't know why they denied her exemption.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXZNiI0bE3I

New VAERS Data as of Mar. 4th, 2022 (posted Mar. 11, 2022)

27,367 Deaths and 1,252,208 Adverse Events

25,158 Pfizer/Moderna and 2,209 J&J Deaths

Source: https://www.drtenpenny.com/newslette...#comp-l05wers0
PLUS 1,168,894 Pfizer / Moderna and 83,314 J&J Adverse Events

https://www.drtenpenny.com/newslette...#comp-l05werr2

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2...2023_26_16.jpg

The US Military Has Its Own Version of VAERS, And The Results Are Frightening
by Fed Up Texas Chick

https://thetenpennyreport.com/the-us...e-frightening/

See fully hyperlinked article at original site linked above.



On January 24, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin) held a round-table discussion on the COVID vaccines and COVID treatment protocols. Near the end of the 5-hour discussion, attorney Thomas Renz stunned attendees with data obtained from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). This data was obtained by Renz from three whistleblowers who felt the data must be shared with the general public.

​
Why did the whistleblowers feel so strongly about it?
​

DMED contains anonymized medical data of all US military servicemen and women, and there is overwhelming proof that the COVID-19 jabs are causing devastating harm.



Here’s a sample of what the database contains:

300% increase in miscarriages

300% increase in certain cancers, and

1000% increase in neurological disorders.

Bell’s Palsy (319%)

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (250%)

Multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases (487%)

Put in perspective, Renz explained that between January and November 2021, neurological disorders jumped from 82,000 to 863,000.

Let that sink in.

Other shocking data include:

Pulmonary embolisms (467%)
Immunodeficiencies (275%)
Neoplasms (often a precursor to cancer) (296%)
Non-traumatic hemorrhages (including subarachnoid and intracranial) (312%)
Spontaneous abortions and miscarriages (306%)
HIV (590%)


To put the HIV cases into perspective, over the last five years, the military database reported, on average, 454 annual cases. But in the first ten months of 2021, the number of reported HIV cases jumped to 2,681.
And, by the way, the jabs are not preventing military men and women from being diagnosed with the SARS-CoV2 virus.

DMED data: The Smoking Gun

Percentage increases were compared to the averages over the previous five years of DMED data. Attorney Leigh Dundas explained in this video from Dr. Charlie Ward that the data for previous years were relatively constant. Even the 2020 data was fairly stagnant; if COVID-19 were actually affecting young people as they claimed, we would have seen a much greater increase due to COVID infection in the 2020 data.

However, there were very few changes. When the COVID jabs were introduced in December 2020, the incidence of diseases skyrocketed, increasing a thousand-fold. Dundas explained that nearly every ICD-10 code increased, except for one – Chagas disease, an infection seen in members deployed to Mexico, Central America, and South America that is caused by a parasitic transmission from the tsetse fly to humans.

Renz told Senator Johnson,

“Our soldiers are being experimented on, injured and sometimes possibly killed.”

Watch Renz’s full testimony here.

Dundas and Renz presented evidence that the top military brass is likely covering up the true picture by manipulating DMED data to conceal certain conditions and diseases. Case in point: Anxiety had a massive percentage increase in the database but “anxiety” can include racing heart and other cardiac symptoms possibly indicative of myocarditis.

Is the military trying to hide the number of heart issues induced by these shots? Whistleblowers have noted from DMED searches for “acute myocarditis” revealed approximately 1,200 cases in August 2021. Were 900 cases truly miscategorized and later recategorized, or did the data get scrubbed?

Myocarditis cases rose from 127 to 363, a 285% increase, but the purportedly scrubbed data represent over a 1000% increase. Incidences of chest pain rose by a whopping 1,529% and breathing difficulty by 905%. Myocarditis and anxiety are certainly not the same. Myocarditis creates permanent heart damage and is certainly career-limiting as well as life-limiting.

In stark contrast to the DMED data, CDC only reports three main conditions in adults: (1) thrombosis, (2) Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), and (3) myocarditis. Despite the CDC’s own admission that 12- to 29-year-old males are most at risk for developing vaccine-induced myocarditis, the military did nothing to protect the vulnerable 18-29 age group of soldiers.

But there’s more.

DMED is the anonymized version of the Department of Defense’s (DoD) premier epidemiological resource that has all the military data, called the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS). This database is considered to be one of the best in the world, and is frequently cited in many peer-reviewed journal articles. Shortly after Renz made his whistleblower information public, the DoD said that they discovered an error in the DMED data. While they concluded that the 2021 data were accurate, the DoD stated that its data for 2016-2020 was off — not just off, but off by a factor of 10-fold. This is also interesting, given that no scientist who utilized the data during those years ever found a problem. Incredible.

Renz explains this “data mistake” very eloquently in this X22 Report interview. He also said he has more whistleblowers coming forth than he knows what to do with. He is building a body of irrefutable evidence on Fauci, the CDC, and the FDA.

Renz and Dundas also stated that the DMED was not likely to be the only government reporting system with questionable practices. They also informed the committee to investigate the Project SALUS, an integrated military-civilian database.


The Project Salus study represented an AI-based project sponsored by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint artificial Intelligence Center (JAIC) to understand better the data associated with the vaccinations. The findings should concern everyone interested in COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccine performance and seriously raise questions about POTUS declarations that the current pandemic is one of the “unvaccinated.” If the Project Salus findings are correct—and there are some limitations the authors acknowledge—a majority of those now infected by COVID-19 are vaccinated.


Project Salus also showed positive evidence regarding natural immunity against any virus variants. These investigators published that the COVID injections have diminishing protection, and in fact, lead to an uptick in breakthrough cases. Here’s the full presentation, which has not been made public. Renz strongly suggested at Senator Johnson’s meeting that the DOD and the CDC have been withholding crucial COVID vaccine surveillance data since at least September 2021.
Who’s Lying?

Renz and Dundas say that the DMED data, as well as the SALUS data, deserve “independent substantiation” because scientific fraud has occurred.” Based on these data, the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for all three shots (Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J) should be revoked, as should the Biologics License Application for Pfizer’s Comirnaty product.The FDA did just the opposite. On Monday, January 31, the FDA granted full approval for Moderna’s COVID-19 injection (marketed as SPIKEVAX).

The FDA stated the approval was “based on a comprehensive submission package including efficacy and safety data approximately six months after the second dose.” The indication states that SPIKEVAX is “indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 18 years of age and older.”

DMED data clearly show that the COVID-19 shots don’t prevent disease, but the FDA says it based its decision on solely an industry submittal: “the totality of scientific evidence shared by the Company in its submission package, which included follow-up data from the Phase 3 study showing high efficacy and favorable safety approximately six months after the second dose.”

SPIKEVAX has received approval by regulators in more than 70 countries.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report?

Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Join our list here

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Fed Up Texas Chick is a contributing writer for Vaxxter. She’s a rocket scientist turned writer, having worked in the space program for many years. She is a seasoned medical writer and researcher who is fighting for medical freedom for all of us through her work.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-...ness-documents

US pushed partnership with Wuhan lab since 2017 – with promise of 'pandemic preparedness,' documents show
By January 2020, US health officials noted Chinese government not forthcoming about COVID-19 outbreak

In October 2017 – when most Americans never heard the word coronavirus, and SARS was, if anything, a distant memory – the U.S. government was planning joint research projects with China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.

That’s when Gray Handley, associate director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases, forwarded the information to colleagues that said, "China’s Interest in the Global Virome Project Presents an Opportunity for Global Health Cooperation."
A woman gets tested at a mobile COVID-19 testing van.

A woman gets tested at a mobile COVID-19 testing van. (Liao Pan/China News Service via Getty Images)

"U.S.-China collaboration on the Global Virome Project is an opportunity to lead innovation in science, collaborate with China, and potentially contribute to scientific breakthroughs," said the summary of the Global Virome Project in the email that was part of 92 pages obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit with the National Institutes of Health.
placeholder

The documents show that cooperation would include efforts in the coming years, such as U.S. government scientists providing training for Wuhan lab scientists in 2018. A key selling point was such a partnership would mean "pandemic preparedness" and "enable rapid detection" of viruses to prevent outbreaks. But by January 2020, U.S. health officials noted the Chinese government wasn’t being forthcoming about an outbreak, reluctant to say if it was related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).

The 2019 novel coronavirus, better known as COVID-19, is also known as SARS-CoV-2.
Director of Nursing Crystal Jones, 52, loads syringes with the COVID-19 vaccine.

Director of Nursing Crystal Jones, 52, loads syringes with the COVID-19 vaccine. (Stephen Zenner/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

That ambitious cooperation plan raised in October 2017 between two world powers would, among other things, ensure preparedness for a future pandemic, according to the documents.

NYC PARENTS PLAN TO SUE THE MAYOR OVER MASK MANDATES FOR YOUNG KIDS

"While U.S.-based NGOs and academics are likely to provide some leadership for the GVP, it will be important for the USG [U.S. government] to remain engaged in significant ways with the GVP, to ensure that U.S. interests are adequately reflected in this effort, which will facilitate the development of countermeasures against future threats (pandemic preparedness), and enable rapid detection of viral threats and increase the capacity to handle them," the summary of the Global Virome Project says.

The State Department was also in the loop.

By Feb. 23, 2018, another email exchange between officials at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing and the National Institutes of Health headquarters referred to a Chinese media account of research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology into how bats "harbor highly pathogenic viruses like Ebola, Marburg and SARS coronavirus but do not show clinical signs of disease."
placeholder

An April 18, 2018, email from an official whose name is redacted, with the subject line "Cable on Wuhan Institute of Virology visit," refers to a cable that says, "China Virus Institute Welcomes More U.S. Cooperation on Global Health Security." The cable later adds, "China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a global leader of virus research, is a key partner for the United States in protecting global health security."

This message notes that U.S. scientists were training Wuhan scientists in 2018.

"[E]xperts from the NIH-supported P4 lab at the University of Texas Medical Branch have trained Wuhan lab technicians in lab management and maintenance, institute officials said," the cable continues. "NIH was a major funder, along with China’s National Science Foundation, of SARS research by the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s [redacted]."

The same cable further notes that a redacted word "with the EcoHealth Alliance (a New York City-based NGO that is working with the University of California Davis to manage the [redacted], plans to visit Wuhan to meet with Shi [Zhengli]."

EcoHealth Alliance is a nonprofit that received about $600,000 in U.S. tax dollars. The organization spent money studying coronavirus in bats at the Wuhan lab between 2014 and 2019. The NIH sent a letter to EcoHealth Alliance in July 2020, asking about its relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Shi Zhengli is described elsewhere in the documents obtained by Judicial Watch as a scientist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the China country coordinator for the PREDICT project, which was a research project funded by the State Department’s U.S. Agency for International Development to fight disease. This project was described as a forerunner to the Global Virome Project.

In December 2019, the first known cases of COVID-19 emerged in China and began to spread. On Jan. 8, 2020, Dr. Ping Chen, a top NIAID official working in China, emailed senior NIAID colleagues, including Handley, with a subject line, "PRC Response to Pneumonia Cases Shows Increased Transparency Over Past Outbreaks, but Gaps in Epidemiological Data Remain."
placeholder

"It has ruled out SARS, MERS, and flu. [Redacted] confirmed it is a viral infection," Chen told his colleagues.
A security person moves journalists away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

A security person moves journalists away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)

"While PRC officials have released timely and open general information about the outbreak, a lack of epidemiologic data … characteristics of infected individuals, and other basic epidemiologic information – hinders better risk assessment and response by public health officials," the Chen email says. "Authorities have also not released information on how they are defining a ‘case.’ Given these gaps in detailed information to-date, and lack of a final confirmed pathogen, the risk to the United States and global health is difficult to assess at this time."

SEATTLE TEACHERS UNION DEMANDS FORCED MASKING UNTIL MAY TO ENSURE ‘SENSE OF NORMALCY’

Neither the NIAID nor the NIH responded with a comment for this story, though the NIH did acknowledge receipt of the inquiry.

The State Department deferred to an October report by the intelligence community.

The intelligence community assessment says, "One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

But, the report says, "Most agencies also assess with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 probably was not genetically engineered; however, two agencies believe there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way."
placeholder

"China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19," the report says. "Beijing, however, continues to hinder the global investigation, resist sharing information, and blame other countries, including the United States."

"U.S.-China collaboration on the Global Virome Project is an opportunity to lead innovation in science, collaborate with China, and potentially contribute to scientific breakthroughs," said the summary of the Global Virome Project in the email that was part of 92 pages obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit with the National Institutes of Health.

The documents show that cooperation would include efforts in the coming years, such as U.S. government scientists providing training for Wuhan lab scientists in 2018. A key selling point was such a partnership would mean "pandemic preparedness" and "enable rapid detection" of viruses to prevent outbreaks. But by January 2020, U.S. health officials noted the Chinese government wasn’t being forthcoming about an outbreak, reluctant to say if it was related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).

The 2019 novel coronavirus, better known as COVID-19, is also known as SARS-CoV-2.

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxne....jpg?ve=1&tl=1

That ambitious cooperation plan raised in October 2017 between two world powers would, among other things, ensure preparedness for a future pandemic, according to the documents.

NYC PARENTS PLAN TO SUE THE MAYOR OVER MASK MANDATES FOR YOUNG KIDS

"While U.S.-based NGOs and academics are likely to provide some leadership for the GVP, it will be important for the USG [U.S. government] to remain engaged in significant ways with the GVP, to ensure that U.S. interests are adequately reflected in this effort, which will facilitate the development of countermeasures against future threats (pandemic preparedness), and enable rapid detection of viral threats and increase the capacity to handle them," the summary of the Global Virome Project says.

The State Department was also in the loop.

By Feb. 23, 2018, another email exchange between officials at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing and the National Institutes of Health headquarters referred to a Chinese media account of research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology into how bats "harbor highly pathogenic viruses like Ebola, Marburg and SARS coronavirus but do not show clinical signs of disease."

An April 18, 2018, email from an official whose name is redacted, with the subject line "Cable on Wuhan Institute of Virology visit," refers to a cable that says, "China Virus Institute Welcomes More U.S. Cooperation on Global Health Security." The cable later adds, "China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, a global leader of virus research, is a key partner for the United States in protecting global health security."

This message notes that U.S. scientists were training Wuhan scientists in 2018.

"[E]xperts from the NIH-supported P4 lab at the University of Texas Medical Branch have trained Wuhan lab technicians in lab management and maintenance, institute officials said," the cable continues. "NIH was a major funder, along with China’s National Science Foundation, of SARS research by the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s [redacted]."

The same cable further notes that a redacted word "with the EcoHealth Alliance (a New York City-based NGO that is working with the University of California Davis to manage the [redacted], plans to visit Wuhan to meet with Shi [Zhengli]."

EcoHealth Alliance is a nonprofit that received about $600,000 in U.S. tax dollars. The organization spent money studying coronavirus in bats at the Wuhan lab between 2014 and 2019. The NIH sent a letter to EcoHealth Alliance in July 2020, asking about its relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Shi Zhengli is described elsewhere in the documents obtained by Judicial Watch as a scientist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the China country coordinator for the PREDICT project, which was a research project funded by the State Department’s U.S. Agency for International Development to fight disease. This project was described as a forerunner to the Global Virome Project.

In December 2019, the first known cases of COVID-19 emerged in China and began to spread. On Jan. 8, 2020, Dr. Ping Chen, a top NIAID official working in China, emailed senior NIAID colleagues, including Handley, with a subject line, "PRC Response to Pneumonia Cases Shows Increased Transparency Over Past Outbreaks, but Gaps in Epidemiological Data Remain."

"It has ruled out SARS, MERS, and flu. [Redacted] confirmed it is a viral infection," Chen told his colleagues.
A security person moves journalists away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

A security person moves journalists away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)

"While PRC officials have released timely and open general information about the outbreak, a lack of epidemiologic data … characteristics of infected individuals, and other basic epidemiologic information – hinders better risk assessment and response by public health officials," the Chen email says. "Authorities have also not released information on how they are defining a ‘case.’ Given these gaps in detailed information to-date, and lack of a final confirmed pathogen, the risk to the United States and global health is difficult to assess at this time."

SEATTLE TEACHERS UNION DEMANDS FORCED MASKING UNTIL MAY TO ENSURE ‘SEN
Neither the NIAID nor the NIH responded with a comment for this story, though the NIH did acknowledge receipt of the inquiry.

The State Department deferred to an October report by the intelligence community.

The intelligence community assessment says, "One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

But, the report says, "Most agencies also assess with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 probably was not genetically engineered; however, two agencies believe there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way."


"China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19," the report says. "Beijing, however, continues to hinder the global investigation, resist sharing information, and blame other countries, including the United States."

https://americasbestpics.com/picture/IeyEFxJO9?s=e

https://img.ifunny.co/images/a0a4061...f50dfb7_1.webp

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...hout-lab-work/



Sports physicals are done primarily to make sure you are not at high risk for sudden cardiac death on the playing field. COVID vaccination affects your risk. In response to worldwide experience and vaccine adverse-event monitoring, we are adopting a more precautionary sports physical sign-off policy:

If you have received doses of any COVID shot, we will not be able to clear you to compete in sports without performing lab work and possibly an echocardiogram to rule out potential heart damage. “

Sign at Virginia Pediatrics Office to Student Athletes: “COVID Vaccination Affects Your Heart – If You Received Doses of Any COVID Shot” We Will Not Clear You “Without Lab Work”

By Jim Hoft
Published March 14, 2022 at 10:49am
453 Comments
Share
Tweet
Gab Share
TelegramTelegram
Gettr Gettr

Jackson River Pediatrics is located in Alleghany County, Virginia.

Recently a patient took a photo of a sign posted at their office in Virginia.

The sign reads:

Advertisement - story continues below

“Sports physicals are done primarily to make sure you are not at high risk for sudden cardiac death on the playing field. COVID vaccination affects your risk. In response to worldwide experience and vaccine adverse-event monitoring, we are adopting a more precautionary sports physical sign-off policy:

If you have received doses of any COVID shot, we will not be able to clear you to compete in sports without performing lab work and possibly an echocardiogram to rule out potential heart damage. “



The Jackson River Pediatrics Facebook account is currently offline. They took down their Facebook page after this sign in their office went viral.



“I know that sometimes we put things like sports physicals off until the last minute,” said the poster, who spoke to PJ Media anonymously. “Part of my intentions of sharing the picture that I took Monday at our pediatrician’s office was to let parents who had their children vaccinated for COVID know that they cannot wait until the last minute for sports physicals,” she said. “I have received backlash from friends and family for not having my children vaccinated for COVID,” she continued. “I believe that my husband and I made the right choice but now I have proof that someone educated far greater than I has evidence that the COVID vaccine can do damage to children’s health.”

The concerned mom thinks people deserve to have all the facts. “I don’t condemn anyone for choosing to vaccinate their children for COVID,” she said. “People need to make the decision that is best for their own situation.”

Hat Tip David

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...on-doctors.jpg

Dachsie comment:

It is very disappointing that Senator Paul has made this very poor and insulting political decision to call for Dr. Anthony Fauci's firing..

Most people have at least begun to wake up and realize the giant fraud that this whole "pandemic" and "virus" and "vaccine" is, even those of us who have not experienced any self or family personal sickness. This giant fraud has destroyed the U S economy and has caused great hardship to almost every family and every person trying to support themselves by working for an employer or having a small business.

Dr. Fauci and every person in top bureaucratic or corporate positions as well as any politician who has supported and promoted all of this, should be put on trial and held accountable for this truly diabolical destruction of human life and property --

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

Source: breitbart.com

“No One Person Should Have Unilateral Authority to Make Decisions For Millions of Americans” – Rand Paul Introduces Amendment to Fire Fauci as NIAID Director

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) on Monday introduced an amendment to strip Dr. Fauci, an unelected bureaucrat, of his position as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Fox News reported.
“We’ve learned a lot over the past two years, but one lesson in particular is that no one person should be deemed ‘dictator-in-chief,’” Rand Paul said in a statement. “No one person should have unilateral authority to make decisions for millions of Americans.”
Fox News reported:

Sen. Rand Paul,

"Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on Monday introduced an amendment that would eliminate Dr. Anthony Fauci’s position as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and decentralize it, so that no one person can act as “dictator-in-chief” in the name of public health, the senator said."


Rand Paul
@RandPaul

No one person should have unilateral authority to make decisions for millions of Americans.

foxnews.com

Rand Paul introduces amendment to eliminate Fauci's position as NIAID director

Mar 14, 2022


Source: thegatewaypundit.com