To Dean Mavalvala, wrong is right.
Printable View
To Dean Mavalvala, wrong is right.
COVIDdemophilia
This is a conspiracy. COVID can't be that smart.
_______
Rashida Tlaib
NYC Mayor Eric Adams
Adam Schiff
Rep. Gerry Connolly
Andy Kim
Rep. Peter Welch
Rep. Kim Schrier, M.D.
Congressman Jared Golden
Joe Neguse
Congresswoman Madeleine Dean
Rep. Zoe Lofgren
Rosa DeLauro
Joaquin Castro
Douglas Emhoff
__________
Source: Despite 15 Dems Announcing They’ve Got Covid, A New Poll Shows Most Americans No Longer Care
I think this is the real link. The link above is a hijacked link.Quote:
Originally Posted by mamboni
https://rumble.com/v10mnew-live-worl...the-water.html
https://rumble.com/embed/vy0hem/?pub=4
Dr. Ardis has put out a long interview on Mike Adams Brighteon TV channel and Stew Peters' platforms and I think Infowars shows.
I have not listened to all of these yet and am not going to spend a lot of time on this unless someone else wants to get some dialog going over a video posted here.
I just want to make a couple of general comments. If what Dr. Ardis is exposing is true, and I believe he has good verified evidence that it is true, then the PLANdemic is about eugenics and population control. Native American population has experienced greatest numbers of deaths and it appears that they have been targeted. Hispanics may take second place. Dr. Lee Merritt's major theme is this targeting ability of the "virus" and "the vaccines" to certain genetically identifiable people groups.
All of this has been planned and partly in operation for at least 25 years.
The main thing I am picking up is the Satanic evil of this plan and its implementation. It is eugenics and genocide and mass murder all rolled into one. There were many false rabbit trails scripted in to the public narrative. The whole bit about Wuhan labs and bats is now out the window with Dr. Ardis's information. What exactly is causing the different causes of death is now to be understood in a new way. Satan is taking over humans and turning them into something non-human.
Pfizer and all of BigPharma are looking particularly evil in the cast of destroyers.
This is and end-time apocolyptic operation to "reset" the whole world.
[
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...Ez_320x180.jpg
SIZE=3]
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gK8P6muVzWEz/[/SIZE]
Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (12 April 2022) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
1:29:33 video runtime
First published at 01:55 UTC on April 13th, 2022.
Jim Fetzer
"MAJOR COVID DEVELOPMENT: The world-premiere of "Watch the Water" may have nailed what's been going on and the role of distraction and disinformation in promoting the fake COVID pandemic and the vax, where it appears (oddly enough) that snake venom may be playing a crucial role. FASCINATING! The missile dropped on the railway depot was not from the Russian arsenal but from the Ukrainian, with the words (in Russian) "For the children!" written on the side in case anyone missed the message. Obama called out for his revisionist history of being "hard on Russia", where many wish he had been more. But Putin acted on principle and with good reasons, which he outlined in his speech of 24 February 2022, which is archived at jamesfetzer.org. He and his colleagues are baffled at sanctions on Putin's daughters. Finish official believes seized Russian art should be returned to the museums that lent it out to other museums in Italy and Japan. New Jersey's sex ed curriculum for 9-year-olds would curl your hair. More and more evidence of Hunter/Joe/Jim corruption emerges. Hospitals refusing life-saving surgery based upon vax status. And the future of electric vehicles imperiled by expense of batteries, high cost of electricity, limited range of mobility and charging time. Jim'/s course on Critical Thinking & Conspiracy Theories continues Wednesday night. Check it out at MixNstream.com/critical-thinkihg.html."
"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less." "The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things." "The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master—that's all."
04/13/22
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...8-3d85d06b4c35
‘Watch the Water’ Right on Remdesivir, But Snake Venom Theory Is a Stretch
While it’s true there is some overlap between the effects of poisonous peptides present in some snake venom and those of SARS-COV2 spike protein, claiming COVID is ultimately derived from snake venom is a poorly substantiated hypothesis.
By
Madhava Setty, M.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg
In an interview Monday with Stew Peters, Brian Ardis, a doctor of chiropractic, attempted to connect SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein or simply the disease process itself known as COVID-19, to the deadly proteins in snake venom.
In the 30-minute, heavily produced conversation, Ardis did not explicitly state his opinion on whether COVID is caused by a virus or by widely dispersed toxins similar to the poisons in snake bites.
Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, took issue with some of Ardis’ statments.
“We agree there is evidence that the virus is similar to snake venom,” Kirsch wrote on Substack. “But as for the other assertions (such as it’s a poison spread through the water), I’m not buying it.”
In a Substack post, Dr. Meryl Nass also disagreed with Ardis, writing, “Many statements in the Bryan Ardis video are accurate, but some are definitely not.”
Nass, an internist and member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, reminded us that Ardis is correctly pointing out that remdesivir is a dangerous drug that has undoubtedly caused or contributed to many COVID deaths.
As early as November 2020, the World Health Organization recommended against the use of remdesivir, regardless of disease severity, because there was no evidence the drug improved outcomes.
Although the expensive drug was widely reported to be ineffective, its harmful effects were downplayed by mainstream sources.
Nevertheless, remdesivir enjoys unwavering support from our medical authorities and remains the only antiviral remedy available in most hospital formularies for the treatment of COVID.
In the interview with Peters, Ardis pointed out a concerning statement on the remdesivir label:
“Risk of reduced antiviral activity when coadministered with chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine sulfate: Coadministration of Remdesivir (VEKLURY) and chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine sulfate is not recommended based on cell culture data demonstrating an antagonistic effect of chloroquine on the intracellular metabolic activation and antiviral activity of VEKLURY.
According to Nass, “This may be another reason the system does not want patients to receive chloroquine drugs because their use would be a contraindication for use of Remdesivir.”
So what about those snakes?
Venom from poisonous snakes, such as the cobra and krait, exert their devastating and immediate effects on human physiology by attacking our central and peripheral nervous system and/or our ability to form blood clots.
Antidotes to venom are mono or polyclonal antibodies that target specific proteins delivered through a snake bite.
Ardis used this connection with monoclonal antibodies to argue that because monoclonal antibodies are an effective treatment for COVID and snake venom, COVID (whether caused by a beta coronavirus or not) is tied to the toxic agents in poisonous snakes.
Ardis told Stewart, “Monoclonal Antibodies are anti-venom.”
However, this statement is not entirely correct. Monoclonal antibodies are specific, synthesized proteins that can bind to one of a myriad of different targets, including active proteins in snake venom.
Anti-venom is a monoclonal antibody. Not all monoclonal antibodies are anti-venom.
The point here is that many proteins may have common effects on our bodies but that doesn’t necessarily mean they have a common origin.
Monoclonal antibodies can neutralize the effects of many different peptides. That doesn’t mean the targets of the antibodies are related.
Ardis also emphasized that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been critical of the use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of COVID.
He made this point in a larger context to allege that our authorities have consistently been blocking effective treatments to prevent recovery.
Yet since the inception of the pandemic, monoclonal antibodies have been an available mainstay of COVID treatment in the immunocompromised and those at high risk for developing severe disease.
Since the rapid emergence of the Omicron variant at the end of 2021, the FDA limited the availability of some monoclonal antibody formulations as it was shown these have a marginal effect against the new strain.
Other inaccuracies
Ardis accurately stated that snake venom can cause an elevated D-Dimer, a nonspecific finding in patients suffering from clotting disorders.
But this test is elevated not only in patients who have excessive bleeding (as in the case of snake-bite victims) but also in patients who are experiencing increased clotting (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary emboli, strokes).
The latter is more common with severe COVID. Thus, an elevated D-Dimer level does not necessarily mean COVID is caused by a snake venom-like process.
Perhaps the most provocative claim Ardis made was around the sedation and mechanical ventilation of critical COVID patients.
Because snake venom paralyzes muscles, including the diaphragm (the muscle most responsible for breathing), by blocking the conduction of signals between nerves and muscles, this, in his view, is more evidence that COVID is a snake venom-like illness.
It is true that it was recognized early on that COVID patients had low levels of blood oxygenation yet appeared to breathe comfortably and regularly.
However, this is not representative of nerve paralysis. It is suggestive of a central process, one that involves the brainstem, not diaphragmatic paralysis.
Moreover, our natural drive to breathe is much more dependent on high levels of carbon dioxide in our blood, not low levels of oxygen.
Nevertheless, Ardis accused the medical system of intentionally causing the death of COVID patients by further reducing respiratory drive by using sedative agents like benzodiazepines, narcotics and other drugs required to place patients on breathing machines (ventilators).
He is correct that these drugs are necessary to allow a person to tolerate the placement of a breathing tube in the trachea for prolonged and brief periods.
However once a person is connected to a ventilator, the machine will substitute for the person’s lack of respiratory drive.
Summary
Although there is some overlap between the effects of poisonous peptides present in some snake venom and those of SARS-COV2 spike protein, claiming COVID is ultimately derived from snake venom is a poorly substantiated hypothesis.
That said, Ardis’ description of the toxic nature of remdesivir is worthy of note and should not be dismissed.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com
Here is an excerpt of a brief article by Steve Kirsch. Mr. Kirsch will put out a video and possibly another article very soon. This particular article contains links to the two main video interviews Dr. Ardis did on this subject, including links to the two-part lengthy presentation with Mike Adams as interviewer/ host.
What I think of the Bryan Ardis video, "Watch the Water"
The video is out. I've seen it. A few parts I agree with. For most other parts I'm skeptical. I've invited Bryan to meet with my colleagues so we can ask questions.
Steve Kirsch
Apr 12 2022
Summary
In this article, I give my overall reaction and then specifically respond to some of the key points in the video.
Some parts I agree with. Most parts I remain unconvinced.
We agree there is evidence that the virus is similar to snake venom.
But as for the other assertions (such as it’s a poison spread through the water), I’m not buying it.
I’ve scheduled a recorded discussion between Bryan and my experts to see if we can form a consensus. That call happens on Thursday April 14 (tomorrow). I’ll post the video.
I’ll update this article as I learn more.
Here are my impressions at the moment. " SNIP
________________
Dachsie comment: Dr. Ardis did not present his theory, that is, his hypothesis, in a clear professional way such as would be appropriate for his profession. The people who have responded in a somewhat informal way, so far, to those video presentations by Dr. Ardis have various advanced degrees in various disciplines, but from what I have read so far, they do not seem to have listened carefully to Dr. Ardis' claims and therefore do not seem to be responding appropriately to them.
Dachsie gave her first impression posting that Dr. Ardis is a showman. He talks fast and seems emotional, a style that makes one think that he is presenting information that is profoundly important, "bombshell."
As always, I consistently see all parties using the term "COVID" in many different ways, conveying different and important meanings. That has been something I have noticed since I started this thread in January of 2020. There is no clear definition of COVID-19 nor consistent grammatical usage of the term. For example, is it an identified disease or is it a disease process? What identifies "COVID-19" as a discreet entity? Very vague.
Of course, the PLANdemic was rolled out and maintained over the last two years by constant deceptions and lies of many kinds, not excluding the criminal kinds.
_______________________________
Hall of Shame:
Roy M. Gulak, MD, MPH
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
https://weillcornell.org/sites/defau...?itok=YJFxMbTX
_____
H. Clifford Lane, MD
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/defa...?itok=d6slsu-s
_____
Henry Masur, MD
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
https://clinicalcenter.nih.gov/sites...-03/hmasur.jpg
_____
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...CJx4Tuiav4&s=r
These people deserve the credit for the deaths of nearly a million Americans
Introducing the members of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines committee.
Steve Kirsch
19 hr ago April 13, 2022
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch...b3_644x351.png
excerpts from this newsletter
Summary
The members of COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel of the NIH apparently doesn’t seem to place any value on human life. In this article, I will show several examples of this.
At no time is there ever a risk-benefit analysis where a dollar amount is placed on the value of a human life. For example, if there are 100 trials and 90% of the trials were positive and 10% were neutral, should the NIH recommend the drug?
Unfortunately, they aren’t accountable to anyone, so they will never have to defend their recommendations.
Nearly a million people have died in the US due to their failure to correctly assess what the data says and recommend interventions that are more likely to be beneficial than detrimental.
What do they do instead? They recommend you take a vaccine that is more likely to kill you than save you.
I’ve invited any of them to discuss this in a recorded meeting with me and a few of my colleagues, but even with a “name your price” incentive, none of them will accept because they know their decisions are not defensible.
In an email to a professor of medicine at a top university, I noted that no matter what the evidence says, they won’t change their recommendations. The professor wrote back, “Suspect you may be correct.” I won’t reveal his name so he doesn’t get fired. That means that fact checkers can’t attack this article with ad hominem attacks on my credentials. And they can’t attack this article on the data either.
If you are fact checking my article, please let’s have a recorded conversation about it before you write your fact check. If you don’t do that, you are being disingenuous.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)
SNIP
Why I say the committee members are responsible for nearly 1M deaths
The Fareed-Tyson early treatment protocol has been available since March 2020. It has a 99.8% mortality reduction. They told the NIH about the protocol in July 2020.
There have been around 850,000 COVID deaths since then. Had the NIH recommended the Fareed-Tyson protocol when they were notified, nearly 850,000 lives could have been saved. At the time, there were no better alternatives. Why ignore it?
Conflicts of interest
Panel members had conflicts of interest that were disclosed and not disclosed.
These would normally be a problem, but here it just doesn’t matter because nobody is holding them accountable.
My challenge
I invite the members of the NIH committee who voted to recommend against any repurposed drugs and/or supplements to an open debate to discuss this with me and a few of my colleagues. I’ll even throw in a financial incentive to make it worth your time. Name your price.
Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Thousands of paid subscribers
I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.
Dachsie comment:
I have many questions about this latest information. I do not know where there is professional objective analysis.
The trust is gone. Do not know what kind of test they are running. Whatever test they are using in all of these hospitals, it apparently is able to find and identify "the more contagious omicron subvariant BA.2" which makes up 86 percent of "new cases."
Until I get some facts and some answers about this "uptick in cases", I will regard this as another political trick
________________________________
https://www.beckershospitalreview.co...812G5550689I0J
COVID-19 cases up in 29 states, hospitalizations up in 12
Molly Gamble (Twitter) - 9 hours ago Print | Email
Listen
Text
Cases of COVID-19 have increased during the last 14 days in 29 states and Washington, D.C., and hospitalizations are ticking upward in 12 states.
Nationwide, COVID-19 cases increased 22 percent over the past 14 days, according to HHS data collected by The New York Times. This marks a change in direction after two months of sustained declines. As the more contagious omicron subvariant BA.2 makes up 86 percent of new cases in the U.S., infections are ticking upward in 29 states and D.C. as of April 14.
Hospitalizations are down 13 percent nationwide over the past 14 day, with a daily average of 14,887 people hospitalized with COVID-19 as of April 14. Hospitalizations have ticked up in 12 states. Here are the 14-day changes for cases in each state reporting an increase, along with their daily average hospitalizations:
Vermont: 149 percent (33 hospitalizations)
Delaware: 31 percent (125)
New Hampshire: 20 percent (44)
New York: 17 percent (1,362)
Rhode Island: 13 percent (51)
New Jersey: 10 percent (429)
Massachusetts: 10 percent (287)
North Carolina: 8 percent (1,013)
Illinois: 4 percent (547)
Maryland: 3 percent (307)
Connecticut: 2 percent (157)
Hawaii: 1 percent (37)
Here are the 14-day changes for cases in each state reporting an increase, along with their daily average cases, according to HHS data collected by The New York Times:
Washington, D.C.: 142 percent (222 cases)
Rhode Island: 109 percent (339)
New Hampshire: 80 percent (218)
New York: 77 percent (5,286)
Oregon: 75 percent (386)
New Jersey: 73 percent (1,849)
Maryland: 72 percent (529)
Connecticut: 70 percent (657)
Pennsylvania: 65 percent (986)
Massachusetts: 65 percent (1,747)
Vermont: 57 percent (209)
Wisconsin: 56 percent (623)
Michigan: 56 percent (1,182)
Florida: 50 percent (1,950)
North Dakota: 50 percent (38)
Virginia: 44 percent (1,022)
Illinois: 44 percent (1,742)
Minnesota: 44 percent (559)
Iowa: 37 percent (129)
Louisiana: 31 percent (132)
Mississippi: 31 percent (104)
Maine: 26 percent (256)
Washington: 20 percent (1,050)
Hawaii: 19 percent (186)
Colorado: 15 percent (1,282)
Kansas: 14 percent (121)
Delaware: 13 percent (118)
Tennessee: 10 percent (263)
Ohio: 4 percent (547)
Nevada: 1 percent (171)
Rhode Island has the highest proportion of BA.2 cases of all states, according to the latest ranking of states by the subvariant's prevalence.
President Joe Biden signed into law March 15 a sweeping $1.5 trillion bill that funds the government through September. The legislation did not include COVID-19 funding the White House had requested from Congress due to partisan disagreement about offsetting the funding.
Senate negotiators agreed to a $10 billion COVID-19 aid package April 4, repurposing earlier unused COVID-19 funds. The legislation's package is now complicated by conflict over President Biden's immigration policy. Republican senators now want a vote on an amendment that would keep in place the Title 42 border restrictions, which allows limits on immigration due to the pandemic. The bill can't proceed without the vote, they say.
U.S. lawmakers began their two-week recess April 8 without acting on the $10 billion COVID-19 relief package. They return to session the week of April 25.
The current lack of funding is affecting resources for COVID-19 testing and treatment. The Health Resources and Services Administration stopped accepting providers' claims for COVID-19 testing and treatment of the uninsured March 22 due to a lack of sufficient funds, and stopped accepting claims for the vaccination of the uninsured April 5. The federal government is also cutting back shipments of monoclonal antibody treatments to states by 30 percent, and the U.S. supply of those treatments could run out as soon as May.
Latest articles on public health :
BA.2 subvariants likely contributing to rising cases in New York, officials say
California drops 5-day quarantine for asymptomatic people exposed to COVID-19
CDC extends federal transportation mask mandate