I will say it one more time ............................ the game is rigged
Printable View
I will say it one more time ............................ the game is rigged
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Another Fetzer/Charmin show, 2 hrs;
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7mTvgfsEnZg/mqdefault.jpg
1:58:43
The Real Deal Ep # 183 Richard Charnin on Stealing Elections / Loose Ends from the DiEugenio Shows
- 1,346 views
- 5 days ago
back up...I will say it again ............................ the game is rigged
from part 2 of the 4 part:
Thread: "Everything is Fake" - Top 40 Pieces of Fakery in Our World
18. Fake Republic
The US was set up to be a Republic, not a Democracy. What’s the difference? The difference is that a republic contains protections of individual and minority rights, so that no matter who is in power, these basic rights can never be infringed, while a democracy runs on majority opinion, so that if a majority (whose emotions can easily be swayed by controllers who own the media and understand psychology) votes to impose its rule on the minority, that’s how it goes.
The US has been deliberately turned from a constitutional republic into a corporate democracy. It is a fake republic now.
http://freedom-articles.toolsforfree...-democracy.png
19. Fake Democracy
The above points about republics and democracies was talking about the technical or legal definition of those terms. In the broader sense, however, people use the word “democracy” to mean a system where the common people have a fair say in public affairs. The US loves to boast how it is delivering democracy to the world, but most invaded countries see – and it’s a long list of aggression from the end of World War 2 until today, from Iran to Guatemala to Cuba to Chile to Panama to Kuwait to Libya to Iraq and many more – is not democracy but rather tanks, fighter jets, missiles and bombs. True democracy has nothing to do with invading other sovereign nations and stealing their resources to please corporate puppeteers.
20. Fake Elections
Elections in many societies have become a farce with the introduction of rigged electronic voting machines that leave no paper trail. If you can’t trust that your vote will be counted properly, how can you possibly think an average person could have any say at all in public affairs? Stalin is rumored to have said that “the people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.” The situation has become so absurd that in the 2012 US presidential race, it was candidate Mitt Romney’s company who actually purchased voting machines! The film Uncounted did a great job exposing how rigged and dysfunctional the Diebold voting machines are.
In addition to rigged voting machines, consider how the fake debates we get shown on MSM TV, where elite-favored candidates are fed softball questions while anyone challenging the establishment is sidelined, given less air time and hit with personal attacks, unfounded accusations or hard questions.
Re the ref above to a docu called "Uncounted", I wasn't even aware of it! :o
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/GXLEjTmQTQg/mqdefault.jpg
Uncounted Trailer
EarnhardtFilms
- 4 years ago
- 150 views
http://www.UncountedTheMovie.com UNCOUNTED: The New Math
of American Elections, a documentary by Emmy ...
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pisBdNLmo-A/mqdefault.jpg
Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections (Full Length)
Justin Wallis
- 5 years ago
- 44,924 views
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Uncounted-The-New-Math-of-A... UNCOUNTED is an explosive ...
UK based Richie Allen show; 38 mins:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Tn53_E0Z_rs/h...bzILPKiLQSe3b0
Richie Debates Canary Editor Kerry-Anne Mendoza On The Futility (Or Not) Of Elections
- 70 views
- 1 hour ago
Another JFriend with guest Jim condit show w all the latest fake election news.
http://therealistreport.com/the-real...im-condit-jr-2
On this edition of The Realist Report, we’re joined by Jim Condit, Jr. In this podcast, Jim provides some updates on the 2016 election and the very real threat of vote fraud. Donald Trump is now openly calling the nomination process “rigged” and “crooked,” which it most certainly is. Trump is dominating the overall vote count and has over 200 more delegates than his nearest rival, yet he still does not have the nomination locked up. The GOP establishment appear intent on preventing the populist businessman turned Republican front-runner from obtaining the nomination before the party convention in Cleveland this summer. Will they be successful? Doubtful!
Below are relevant links for this program:
The Realist Report – Jim Condit, Jr.: Vote Fraud
RealClearPolitics – Republican Delegate Count & Popular Vote results
Trump nearly sweeps NY delegates – The Hill
White Voter Rebellion Crushes Cruz – The New Observer
Let Me Ask America a Question by Donald Trump – Wall Street Journal
Donald Trump rails against ‘rigged system’ before New York primary
Looks like Fetzer nabbed Jim C Jr as guest too; 2 hrs, haven't listened
The Real Deal Ep # 192 VOTESCAM with Jim Condit, Jr.
Media Broadcasting Center Official Channel 983 views
Subscribe
5,524
41
3
Published on Apr 22, 2016
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WE7GGxqs1vg
Electronic Vote Fraud is Alive and Well in Chicago (and beyond)
http://www.bollyn.com/home/#article_15513
May 2, 2016
To have the representation real, the election must be real;
and that where the election is a fiction,
the representation is a fiction also.
Like will always produce like.
- Thomas Paine to the Citizens of the United States, January 29, 1803
HOW VOTES SHOULD BE COUNTED IN A DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
I monitored the French presidential election in Avignon in May 2002 and observed how a proper and transparent vote count is done, using paper ballots, in each polling place across France, in full view of the public. It's really very simple, but such proper elections would put the crimocracy out of business, so they force us to use riggable voting systems.
It was in the run-up to the election of 2000 that I wrote my first article about electronic vote fraud in Chicago. In doing the research for that article, "The Death of Democracy or May the Best Hacker Win" I found that the voting machines being used in Cook County were wide open to vote fraud on a massive scale. I also found that organized crime was behind the production and use of these rigged voting machines. This is when I concluded that the United States had become a crimocracy, a government of criminals, by criminals, for criminals.
What was very discouraging to see was that nobody really cared that the voting machines used in Cook County were not secure and that there was no way to be sure that the tally produced by the machines accurately reflected how the voters had voted. The fact that the vote count could not be authenticated did not seem to bother anyone. As I wrote then:
NOBODY CARES
Tests of computer vote-counting systems used in Illinois from 1983-1987, which tested tens of thousands of ballots, revealed significant errors in the computer counting in more than twenty percent of the tests. Fulle said that in Illinois today there is “a 16 percent error rate” with ballot-counting machines. He expected numerous problems on election night saying “equipment will fail across the state.”
“I don’t understand why nobody cares,” Michael L. Harty, former Illinois director of voting systems and standards said, “At one point, we had tabulation errors in twenty-eight percent of the systems tested, and nobody cared.”
The indifference of election officials, the people ultimately responsible for the integrity of the elections, proves a point made by a former president of the University of Chicago, Robert M. Hutchins, who said, “The death of democracy is not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference, and undernourishment."
OUR SHAM ELECTIONS
Today, 16 years later, electronic vote fraud is still the name of the game in Chicago, Cook County, and across the nation. The following 7-minute video shows that when it comes to vote fraud in Chicago - nothing has changed. This is, of course, not a problem limited to Chicago - it is a national problem. We want to believe that we have democratic and transparent elections when it is crystal clear that we don't.
It is, of course, very simple to have proper elections, but in our corrupt system there is no political will to have open and transparent elections, like those I have observed in France and other countries. If we had proper and transparent elections we could restore the integrity of our democratic republic.
To explain how simple it is to have democratic and transparent elections, I wrote an article with photos from my experience monitoring the French presidential election. The article is entitled "Restoring Democracy in America"
It is, after all, exactly as Thomas Paine said to Americans in 1803: "To have the representation real, the election must be real; and that where the election is a fiction, the representation is a fiction also."
VIDEO EVIDENCE The Voting Machines Are WRONG!
(and It’s Being Covered Up)
Video URL youtu.be/O_mJ5KutY8s
https://youtube.com/watch?feature=yo...&v=O_mJ5KutY8s
Support Christopher Bollyn's efforts to expose the deception of our time.
Donate here or by PayPal to bollyn@bollynbooks.com
Sources and Recommended Reading:
Christopher Bollyn, 21 articles in the section on U.S. Elections & Computer Vote Fraud
www.bollyn.com/electronic-voting/
I will say it one more time ............................ the game is rigged
Haven't listened yet. Listen at
https://ppjg.me/2016/04/28/the-plan-...h-david-frank/
TS Radio: The Plan to Restore America’s Voice with David Frank
April 28, 2016
ppjg Marti Oakley, TS Radio David Frank, honest elections, Marcel Reid, Marti Oakley, TS Radio, vote fraud, voting, whistleblowers, Whistlerblowers summit 1 Comment
TS RAdioJoin us live Friday April 29th, at 8:00 am CST!
WB16:00 am PST … 7:00 am MST … 8:00 am CST … 9:00 am EST
Listen Live HERE!
Call in # 917-388-4520
Hosted by Marti Oakley
__________________________________________________ ___
marcelWhistleblowers! Is presented in coordination with Marcel Reid and the Whistleblowers Summit July 27-29 in Washington DC.
David Frank joins us this morning to discuss the fatal flaws in our system of voting. What exactly has gone wrong? Who did it? How did they do it? Does your vote matter?
David will cover the “whodunit” plaguing our voting system then give us a plan that could radically alter not only the way we vote, but how to ensure a fair and honest vote.
david.frank.77920@facebook.com
www.onevoicenow.org/video
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr. – Election Fraud & The Jewish Shadow Government (10-10-16)
Author and election fraud whistleblower Jim Condit Jr. will join chris on The Militia Intelligence Report. The two cover 100% rigged elections and controversial topics; International Banking, Adolf Hitler and much more. Calls taken in the second hour! Music list
With 43 comments http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...ment-10-10-16/
Reports of Potential Voting Trickery in 2016 Presidential Election
October 26, 2016 MHB Administrator 6 Comments
Dallas elections officials say allegations “likely false or instances of user error”
Over the past few weeks corporate news media have interpreted Donald Trump’s repeated claims of a “rigged” election as exaggerated. The Republican presidential candidate’s response in the third presidential debate of perhaps not accepting the election result was met with similar bluster by the major punditocracy.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=...&v=Rb592tRwcYY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb592tRwcYY
The experience of voters in Texas and other states may be bearing out Trump’s warning as multiple reports are surfacing of electronic voting machines changing virtual ballots from Republican to Democratic presidential candidates. Because Texas law prohibits videos and photos in polling places many voters in that state explain the apparent polling shenanigans on social media.
As The Economic Collapse Blog observes,
[A] number of voters in Texas are reporting that the voting machines switched their votes from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton. The odd thing is that none of the other choices were affected when these individuals attempted to vote for a straight Republican ticket. If Hillary Clinton is declared the winner of the state of Texas on election night, a full investigation of these voting machines should be conducted, because there is no way that Donald Trump should lose that state. I have said that it will be the greatest miracle in U.S. political history if Donald Trump wins this election, but without the state of Texas Donald Trump has exactly zero chance of winning. So those living down in Texas need to keep reporting anything unusual that they see or hear when they go to vote.
Here are several social media posts from the Dallas Morning News article at the I Am A Texan blog.
Continue reading Reports of Potential Voting Trickery in 2016 Presidential Election → https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/10/2...tial-election/
From bev harris; short & longer versions about the (((GEMS vote counting software))).
9m:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpq...ature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM
25m:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AG...ature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44
Quote:
Fraction Magic - Detail Version
Bev Harris 100,545 views
Subscribe
785
1K
20
Published on Oct 31, 2016
A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found, with context and explanation. Demonstration uses a real voting system and real vote databases and takes place in seconds across multiple jurisdictions. Over 5000 subcontractors and middlemen have the access to perform this for any or all clients. It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses. All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors. It's a product. It's scaleable. It learns its environment and can adjust to any political environment, any demographic. It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.
Another Condit visit with host Chris Dorsey-- a fairly new renegade host who i've never warmed up to; too knowitall/dogmatic, abrasive, & boastful about how harassed & poisecuted he's been by the jesuits lol :D IOW, extra high odds of being an agitprop/dis-direction spook himself. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Militia Intelligence Report: Jim Condit Jr – Vote Fixing, Catholicism & Hitler (10-31-16)
Jim Condit Jr is back by popular demad to the MIR. chris and Jim take calls on Catholicism and Christianity in general, Hitler, the international Jewish Military Media Banking Complex and The Fixing of elections.
http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/...tler-10-31-16/
25:19 mins
Biggest Election Fraud In History Discovered In The United States: Breaking Now
The Alex Jones Channel
188,627 views
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GFxKJ7RJ1jE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFxKJ7RJ1jE
Trying to reconcile DT'S official 47.5/47.7% win, with my overall paradigm which asssumes the spooks, as servants of (((TPTB))), have total control over "election results".
After the JSM spent months pimping utterly fake polls giving killery the lead to prep the public for the fake results, now with DTs win by 0.2% of the popular vote, they're babbling on about DTs "stunning upset", and wondering aloud what could have gone so wrong with their polls?
When in reality it was obvious all along that DT led by somewhere in the double digits, and I expect the same was true in the REAL pop vote numbers from last night... IE we're looking at fraudulent vote numbers making it appear as some kind of photo finish when it was actually a DT landslide.
I speculate something changed in the recent month behind the scenes in killery's preordained installation as potus. Deals were made-- guessing something about DTs forgetting about his killery prosecution, & his installing a cabal of dinjooz for his cabinet & key appointments, in exchange for allowing him to become prez.
Point was not blowing up the whole poker game-- the secret societies, pedo rings, satanism, JWO, etc.
Plus with neocon pence as veep, they can always just whack DT & have their boy be prez.
Any thoughts?
Guest Posts
Trump’s Victory Should Not Obfuscate Election Fraud
November 9, 2016 MHB Administrator 9 Comments
[Democratic Party operatives clearly believed they could steal the 2016 Presidential Election for Hillary Clinton, just as they had done for her in the Democratic Primary. This is suggested, for example, in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s November 8 remarks on PBS’s NewsHour, where she exhibited strong confidence in a Clinton victory. This no doubt is the type of hubris that drove much of the electorate to vote against the incumbent party. Further, Dems chose an embodiment of establishment incompetence, insincerity and corruption who remarkably failed to even inspire her own purported base to turn out the vote, CNN observes. Still, as this brief article below suggests, the public will likely never know the Republican candidate’s true margin of victory, -Ed.]
Doug Steil
Aletho News
As luck would have it Hillary Clinton’s landslide loss was so big that massive election fraud by Democratic Party operatives in various cities could not overcome her deficit.
The “shock” by insiders of having lost obviously reflects their earlier certainty of prevailing, which hints at the extent of their vote rigging schemes. The unverifiable system of voting in America is so flawed that foreign observers are now being blocked from monitoring US elections. The topic of fraud can no longer be swept under the rug.
Surely Clinton and the media will try to make a big deal of having “received more votes” than Trump in the popular vote total, which according to the current tabulation has already occurred, with an even higher differential to come once West Coast state results are all counted.
Those inside the DC Beltway and within elite campuses will claim that this is “unfair” and that Hillary really “should have won”.
However, this assertion should be vociferously challenged. Surely this surplus is artificial. Is it really possible that so many Americans would have ignored the prospect of going to war with Russia?
The question needs to be raised publicly: How many hundreds of thousand votes were switched from Trump to Clinton altogether and how many invalid (illegal) votes were registered for her?
Aside from that — assuming all the votes were legitimate — the electoral college system is intended to prevent, say, a concentration of votes in urban centers to the detriment of rural voters across the country. As is the case in Maine and Nebraska, voters in individual states can decide how to allocate their electoral votes, so it doesn’t have to be a winner-take-all system.
It is a tribute to the designers of the US Constitution that the Electoral College mechanism still exists. It’s almost as if though they might also have already suspected long ago that there could be illicit efforts in the future to change an election outcome simply by stuffing the ballots in a few locations. The indirect US electoral system has saved the country from a big crisis brought on by election fraud. Instead of changing the Constitution future election reforms should focus on making vote fraud impossible or extremely difficult to carry out.
With growing reader comments,
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/0...lection-fraud/
I commented at memoryholeblog.com
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/0...comment-119547
maxgail
November 10, 2016 at 2:30 PM
I’m all for the overall vote fraud issue of this article; but where it (and a couple reader comments) go off track IMHO, is pinning the mainly electronic voter fraud on “Clintons/the DemRats”.
AFAIC the whole fake “election” system introduced with 2001’s mockingly named “Help America Vote Act” (HAVA) was a product of the alphabet spook agencies, in service to their real bosses: the NWO banksters. TPTB/NWO obviously have a problem with a fullly honest/transparent/auditable election process, given that their global tyranny agenda isn’t in the lower 99.x percent’s best interests.
I was active in the “verifiable voting” movement circa ’04 when the blackbox/fake “election” nightmare was coming into focus. I recall the question of why the software running these blackboxes was allowed to be closed-source/secret/proprietary rather than open-source & inspectable by anyone? The official answer as smugly disseminated by the NWO-propaganda-MSM was how the blackbox supplying corp’s (then Diebold & others) had a legitimate need to protect their investments in the software they developed, and the NWO media dismissed any further questions/discussion of it. Imagine, software tasked with a simple 1+1=2 job which any beginner programmer could write; software depended on at the core of our (pretend) democracy, yet allowed to be ‘secret’. I also recall a bill in Congress to prohibit all wireless tech capabilities in the blackboxes, which was quietly, bipartisanly dismissed.
The above only makes sense when accepting that the current HAVA pretend-“election” process is fully, ‘invisibly’ corrupt/manipulable from its inception BY DESIGN by TPTB/NWO. I recall watching the propaganda-MSM’s post ’04 “election” coverage, where WRT voter’s impressions of the new HAVA blackboxes, they paraded out exiting voter after voter who gushed about how they loved it; so simple & easy, oh such an improvement!! No dissenting opinions to be heard.
Point is, the HAVA pretend voting system is a product of, and under the full control of the NWO banksters through their spook agency proxies, aided by their propaganda-MSM in pretending it’s all so legit… not “the clintons/DemRats.”
Reply
maxgail
November 10, 2016 at 4:13 PM
I’ll add, given my belief above re our HAVA/fake “election outcomes” being under full NWO bankster control– following is what I believe happened wrt Trump’s recent “upset victory” (as the MSM has labored to discharacterize it…). I read this 2-part blog which makes the case for DT’s being a de facto mossad controlled sexual deviate/pedo:
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/...led-by-mossad/
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/...ossad-part-ii/
Some of the reader comments there, dated ~1 week before the 11/8 fake “election”, speculate that the NWO may have switched horses from HRC to DT; but with a ‘photo-finish’ pretend vote outcome, perhaps with the popular vote vs electoral college disparity which we’ve since seen the official fake election outcome reflect– no ‘mandate’ for DT. I’d personally guess DT’s real lead over HRC, both through the couple months preceding 11/8, and in the TRUE 11/8 vote outcome, was in the double digits somewhere… in spite of the NWO-Propaganda-MSM’s incessant pre-election pushing of fake latest poll numbers indicating HRC leading… psyop’ing the electorate in preparation for her seemingly inevitable installment as POTUS. You’ve all seen Newsweek’s now infamous “Madame President” edition, on sale before the fake election, yes?!
Well it did appear the NWO/backroom machinations were furiously in play in the 1-2 weeks prior to 11/8… Comey’s re-opening then re-closing of FBI’s HRC investigation; the ongoing Wikileaks disclosures including some tips of TPTB’s ritual satanic abuse/pedo iceberg, team-HRC’s purchasing a NYC fireworks show 1-2 weeks before the fake election then cancelling it the day before, etc. This all after months of blatant MSM pro-HRC anti-Trump psyop’ing of the public. So it does appear to me that TPTB/NWO did in fact switch horses around the last minute; and their MSM was/is still in disarray as to how they should spin things come 11/8.
The Soros/MoveOn orchestrated “protests” last night are a whole ‘nother tar baby to discuss! I did notice how, at least CNN, went wall to wall on that synthetic “story” for a few hours last night… that’s always a psyop ‘tell’…
Tuesday proves one of two things:
1) the elections are not fake;
2) Trump is fake.
I can't easily copy over formatting, embedded links nor pics from this 'device' so reco reading this at the source; plus there's growing reader comments there.
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/1...rt-of-the-deal
Just posting this here for a bit of internet redundancy; as i'd noticed MHB blog was offline this past Monday.
Guest Posts
President Donald Trump: The Art of the Deal
November 10, 2016 MHB Administrator 10 Comments
By Vivian Lee
I don’t do it for the money. I’ve got enough, much more than I’ll ever need. I do it to do it. Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That’s how I get my kicks.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
The stunning win by Donald J. Trump in the November 8th U.S. presidential election took many by surprise, since Hillary Clinton was the chosen candidate. Everyone seemed to think that Clinton would win – either legitimately or in a rigged election. News coverage favored Clinton by a wide margin, and the only major network to give Trump a break was Fox News.[1] Most polls predicted that Clinton would win the presidency, with her odds of winning put as high as 85% and Trump’s as low as 35%.[2] The pundits are now asking how they all got it wrong.[3]
trump-art-of-the-deal
Donald Trump with his book, The Art of the Deal. Image: The Guardian.
Blame is being placed on “the e-mail scandal,” with James Comey’s letter of October 28 to the U.S. Congress refocusing attention on Clinton’s private e-mails just 11 days before the election.[4] FBI Director Comey reopened the investigation after another 650,000 e-mails were found, this time on the laptop of Anthony Weiner, husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The laptop was confiscated by the New York Police Department (NYPD) and turned over to the FBI. On November 6, Comey caved to pressure, announcing that no charges were warranted, but some said the damage had been done.[5]
Election night was a long, drawn-out affair, with final results not in until 2:40 am on Wednesday. The television networks “called” the electoral vote in the states, a notoriously undemocratic way of deciding U.S. elections before all the votes have actually been counted. Fox News ran consistently high vote counts for Trump, as opposed to the lower numbers predicted at CNN. Dramatic coverage continued into the wee hours, with a number of states said to be “too close to call” – including Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona, all of which eventually went to Trump, who won by a landslide.[6]
megyn-kelly-screenshot-11-8-16Megyn Kelly going to find out why Fox can’t call any more states for Trump. Image Fox News.
Although many states were “called” earlier in the evening based on partial results and exit polls, the last few states were agonized over by the networks, with Fox anchor Megyn Kelly walking back to the desk of experts twice to ask them why they could not call these key states – and when they might be able to do so. According to Kelly, she thought Fox would be able to call the election around 11 pm. She said she expected Clinton to win, until there was an abrupt shift, when “the real vote” started to come in. She ascribed the dramatic turnaround to
“a hidden Trump vote…It was a resounding victory. I have never seen anything like this. You will never have a result this shocking where people got it shockingly this wrong.”[7]
A return to Anthony Weiner’s laptop may provide an explanation.
weiner-washington-times
Anthony Weiner. Image Washington Times.
Unnamed but highly-placed sources, including NYPD detectives and prosecutors, revealed that the laptop contained “enough evidence to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life.” Also reportedly involved were Huma Abedin, Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein – convicted pedophile, as well as members of the U.S. Congress, the Saudis, and other interests in the Middle East. Epstein and his “Lolita Express” have been associated with numerous well-known people, such as Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and Bill Clinton.[8] The NYPD reportedly said that if the FBI and Department of Justice did not issue indictments against “Clinton and co-conspirators,” they would go public with the e-mails. According to an NYPD chief:
What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach…There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to WikiLeaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that…People are going to prison.[9]
This being the case, what better way to stanch the blood than to give Trump the presidency?
Although Comey let Clinton off the hook, it seems clear that forces within the government had decided she was a liability. Should she be elected, the emails would come out, and she would be indicted along with many others. And Trump had vowed to investigate “crooked Hillary” with chants from supporters to “lock her up.”[10] Inconveniently, as it now turned out, the election had been fixed in favor of Clinton.[11] Clearly it was time to make a deal with Trump.
trump-1985-la-times
Donald Trump in 1985, shortly before the publication of The Art of the Deal. Image Los Angeles Times.
The best thing you can do is deal from strength, and leverage is the biggest strength you can have. Leverage is having something the other guy wants. Or better yet, needs. Or best of all, simply can’t do without.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Let’s say that Trump was approached by government insiders and told he could be president – if he agreed to certain terms. Let’s say that the deal was this: Trump gets a win on November 8th and becomes the nation’s 45th president; he lets all allegations against Clinton and her foundation drop; he respects Obama’s “legacy”; and he agrees to partner with Israel.[12] This deal was struck after Comey’s letter of October 28. Clinton was given notice as Election Day approached (although she may have held out hope that she could win). And the news teams were informed during the course of the election.
When the counter-fix went live, the networks experienced the turnaround – the “hidden Trump vote” referred to by Megyn Kelly. Around 10 or 11 pm, the anchors began to refer to Trump as the winner, frequently correcting themselves or qualifying their statements: “I mean, IF he wins,” or “that is, presuming he is elected.” This included Anderson Cooper and his cronies at CNN, who suddenly turned conciliatory toward Trump after months of abuse and slander. The consolation prize went to Clinton: winning the popular vote. Even this was predicted by the networks, with no surprise or consternation.
It’s strange how things can turn around.
-Donald Trump, The Art of the Deal
Was this the deal of a lifetime? Or did Trump really win the election?
Vivian Lee is the nom de plume of a tenured professor at an east coast university.
Notes:
[1] “Open Season on Donald Trump: Corporate Press Propaganda at Behest of Clinton Campaign.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/10/2...nton-campaign/
[2] “Why Did Many Polls Seem To Miss a Trump Victory?” CBS News, 11/9/16. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-did-...trump-victory/.
[3] “News Outlets Wonder Where the Predictions Went Wrong.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/bu...ent-wrong.html
[4] “FBI Investigating New Emails for Classified Information.” New York Times, 10/28/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016...ton-email.html. “Oct. 28 FBI Letter to Congressional Leaders on Clinton Email Investigation.” Washington Post, 10/28/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/...tigation/2113/
[5] “FBI Chief: No Charges for Clinton after New Emails Reviewed.” New York Times, 11/6/16. http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2016...on-emails.html. “Read the Full Text of James Comey’s Letter on the New Clinton Emails.” USA Today, 11/6/16. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...ails/93398304/
[6] “Donald Trump Wins the Presidency in Stunning Upset over Clinton.” Washington Post, 11/9/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...6d4_story.html. “Presidential Election Results: Donald J. Trump Wins.” New York Times, 11/9/16. http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president. “Key President Election Results by State.” http://www.politico.com/2016-electio.../map/president
[7] “Megyn Kelly Admits She Was Expecting Different Election Result.” Western Journalism, 11/9/16. http://www.westernjournalism.com/meg...ection-result/
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein. “Alan Dershowitz on the Defense (His Own).” New York Times, 12/12/15. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/bu...e-his-own.html. “Prince Andrew Faces Court Appearance in ‘Sex Slave’ Case against Jeffrey Epstein.” Mirror, 9/22/15. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...arance-6495024. “Flight Logs Show Bill Clinton Flew on Sex Offender’s Jet Much More than Previously Known.” Foxnews.com, 5/13/16. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13...sly-known.html
[9] “Breaking Bombshell: NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury.” Infowars, 11/3/16. http://www.infowars.com/breaking-bom...-play-perjury/
[10] “At Florida Rally, Trump Resumes Attacking ‘Crooked Hillary Clinton.’” Washington Post, 9/27/16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...llary-clinton/
[11] “Predetermined Vote Counts Show Nov. 8 Presidential Election Is Rigged in Favor of Hillary Clinton.” https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/201...llary-clinton/ “Trump’s Victory Should Not Obfuscate Election Fraud.” https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/0...lection-fraud/
[12] “Biden: Trump Administration Will Stand with Israel.” cnn.com, 11-9-16. http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politi...ael/index.html
I just started listening to this, recorded 11/6 aka 2 days before the fake election. Bev comes on after 11 min mark.
Sunday, November 6, 2016
Battle Of New Orleans Bev Harris/Rhonda Sheer
Mp3 https://gwking.podbean.com/mf/web/vf...leans_11_3.mp3
My take on this recent election is basically it WAS rigged, for TRUMP-- in a relatively last minute change of horses by (((tptb))). Again see
https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/11/1...rt-of-the-deal
for the likely back story.
At http://blackboxvoting.org/the-brakey-method/
Actions: The Brakey Method
Put the brakes on “mystery elections” once and for all. A simple 3-step method places public elections back under public control.
THE BRAKEY METHOD
http://blackboxvoting.org/wp-content...llot-image.png
Preserve and make public the “ballot images” — Modern voting systems take a picture of every ballot, called a “ballot image.”
Peg the ballot image to the actual ballot using a unique ID number (not connected to any voter identifier in any way).
Make sure ballots are a public record so that any person can arrange to inspect the actual ballots at any time.
Ballot images can be released electronically, either upon request or — better — by placing them on the Web, allowing any person to examine pictures of any or all ballots. These electronic images can be authenticated by any person by checking any ballot, which must contain same unique ID number.
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q. Do all voting systems make ballot images?
A. Most of them do. The best ballot images are actual photographic images of voter-marked paper ballots, but even the paperless DRE machines are capable of, and usually do, automatically make ballot images.
Q, Where do I go to ask to see ballot images?
A. Public records and freedom of information laws direct persons to the “custodian of the records.” For most locations, the custodian of the records for ballot images is the county elections office. In some locations, primarily in New England, the custodian of the records is a municipality.
Q. How do I ask for the ballot images?
A. You can go to the elections office with a USB stick in hand and ask for a copy as a public records request.
Q. What if they tell me the ballot images don’t exist?
A. There are two possible reasons this could be the case: (1) They destroyed the ballot images, which violates records retention requirements and destroys a crucial audit record, and, in some states, constitutes a felony. (Note that one case, in Alameda County Calif, required an election official to re-run an election after she destroyed audit records.) Or (2) They are using old, out of date voting machines, some of which do not produce a ballot image. If they destroyed the ballot images, seek out a qualified attorney to take appropriate legal action, or focus on obtaining legislation to require preservation of ballot images and making them public. If they are using machines which do not produce the images, focus on public pressure to purchase the right kind of voting machines next time, and/or on getting legislation requiring the use of machines that produce ballot images, plus public release of the images.
Q. What if they won’t let me see anything at all?
A. Some states, like Kansas, Utah, and Nevada, have passed exceptionally undemocratic laws which prohibit any inspection of key election audit documents. If this is the case, litigation or change of legislation will be the appropriate action.
Q. How does the Brakey Method address issues like voter purges or voter ID?
A. It doesn’t. The Brakey Method solves transparency problems with the counting of the vote. There is no magic wand that solves all types of election integrity issues in one swoop. It helps to parse election integrity into four components:
– Who can vote (voter lists)
– Who did vote (participating voter lists)
– Counting of the vote (The Brakey Method produces transparency and auditability of the count).
– Chain of custody (Are the ballots and images the real ballots? Have any gone missing or been added?)
Q. Why is it called The Brakey Method?
A. Actually it has a lengthier pedigree. The first election integrity advocate to propose using ballot images to authenticate the count was Harri Hursti, in 2006. Hursti is the computer security expert who demonstrated hacking voting machines in the film Hacking Democracy. (See http://hackingdemocracy.com). Black Box Voting promoted this concept in 2006, working with Hursti to produce a prototype to allow public, open source, automated counting of ballot images if desired. A commercial fisherman named Kevin Collins, from Humboldt County California, together with Carolyn Crnich, a Humboldt County election official, met with Bev Harris to discuss actually implementing the use of ballot images to authenticate the count. Humboldt County purchased an off-the-shelf scanner and began making its ballot images available to the public in 2008. A Humboldt County citizen named Mitch Trachtenberg developed free open source software which improved on the original Hursti prototype. The first time Humboldt County allowed public authentication of the count using ballot images, it was discovered that the central tabulator had miscounted. A Colorado citizen named Marilyn Marks filed, and won, a succession of lawsuits establishing that both ballots and ballot images must be treated as public records in Colorado. But it was in 2016, under the relentless and strategic efforts of Arizona election integrity advocate John Brakey, that the ballot image concept really began to take off.
Brakey requested ballot images from Pima County, was told they were being destroyed. He sought and obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to prohibit Arizona officials from destroying the images. His work mushroomed out into many other U.S. states, generating cooperation from some and obstruction from others. It is Brakey who boiled this important transparency measure down into a simple three-part method (images, connector ID, right to examine actual ballots). It is Brakey who has been most effective at propagating this excellent solution. We need a name for it. Bev Harris started calling it The Brakey Method to make it easy to say and easy to explain as a 1-2-3 process that:
a. Is already available with most voting systems
b. Is already pinned into Freedom of Information rights in most places
c. Costs little or nothing to implement
OBJECTIONS
“This might allow voters to sell their vote.” — No, it won’t, and if you are concerned about that you are against vote-by-mail right? Because it is far easier to sell a vote by just taking a picture of an absentee ballot than by trying to identify an anonymous ballot image.
“This might jeopardize secrecy of the ballot.” — No, it doesn’t, unless your election administration is permitting an identifier on the ballot which ties back to the voter. One state, Colorado, was caught doing this, embedding a QR code on each ballot which connected to vote ID number, permitting election officials and vendors to see how you voted. The solution is to prohibit printing identifying information on the ballot. There is no special class of persons such as election officials or vendors who have a right to see how you voted.
Using The Brakey Method, it doesn’t matter if Attila the Hun owns the voting machines, the public will once again own its elections.
Work on getting The Brakey Method going in your location. It is, at this time, the most important thing you can to do protect the counting of the vote.
http://blackboxvoting.org/the-brakey-method/
Also see: Ballot Images – A new way to verify that results are true
http://blackboxvoting.org/ballot-images/
JFriend has up this article:
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...ry-420x240.jpg
Owner of Servers Implicated in DNC Hacks Says No One Is Interested in Truth Behind Computer Crimes
December 16, 2016 4 comments
The mainstream media argues with no real evidence that the Russian government has been behind computer hacking targeting top Democrats and U.S. elections systems. However, the man who runs the servers implicated in the crime said no U.S. law enforcement or intel agency is interested in speaking with him to gather evidence on the perpetrators.
to which I just commented:
PatColo December 20, 2016 8:08 am
http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/ce2f23d...?s=72&d=mm&r=g Your comment is awaiting moderation.
The (((Legacy Mockingbird Media’s))) orchestrated, synchronized rollout of their “Russia hacked the sacred US election, OH MY!!” psyop is also designed to enshrine the myth that the USA’s fake blackbox elections have any integrity in the first place, & that said US election “results” aren’t already completely fraudulent & (((CIA/MSM))) controllable. The same CIA who’s been neck deep in rigging elections worldwide since their WW2 inception, and whose expertise in election rigging was surely brought to bear in designing USA’s current “perfect fake election” system, in accordance with the mockingly named “Help America Vote Act.”
I maintain that (((TPTB))) were planning to rig the recent “election” to hand it to Killery, right up until late Oct, as surely as their weaponized (((MSM))) gaslighted the public all Fall about how a Killery “win” was virtually assured. But the Podesta emails, where the tip of the #Pizzagate iceberg appeared, threatening to illuminate the DC elite’s whole Ritual Satanic Child Abuse underbelly which binds them… had (((TPTB))) scrambling like cockroaches to keep the lid on that. They figured a Crooked/Sick-Killery “win”, and the vast scrutiny which would follow such a grand fraud against the public (guessing Trump’s real popular vote lead was 20+ percent), would be bad for their sudden new highest agenda: snuffing out their #Pizzagate Ritual Satanic Child Abuse uber-scandal.
So they rigged the election “results” to properly give it to “wildcard” Trump; but to erase his real 20+ percent popular vote advantage & likely 50 state electoral college sweep– and rather rigged it to appear like it was a thin “technical win”, with a pop vote loss, giving wildcard Trump “no mandate,” which would hopefully make him & the still-deceived public, more controllable.
And (((they))) also hoped to appease the 60+ percent of the public who actually voted Trump, and thus help turn the bloodhounds away from #Pizzagate. Post fake-election, we’ve also seen (((their weaponized MSM))) roll out their fake “Fake News Crisis” psyop against the alt-media, with (((goog/YT/FB/twit/reddit/etc))) instantly jumping on board… all in a further (futile!) effort to snuff out #Pizzagate.
So we rightfully got our Trump, albeit robbed of (the wide perception of) his “landslide mandate”; but the alt-media bloodhounds are STILL all over #Pizzagate, to (((TPTB’s))) obvious frustration. Oh look, look over here, “Ruskies tried to hack our sacredalready fakeelection, OH MY!!!” lolz; interesting times. :D
Diversity includes diversion...
New Sofia Smallstorm interview;
Laura Pressley 10/6/17
http://aboutthesky.com/images/storie...ssley_crop.png
Dr. Laura Pressley ran for City Council in Austin, Texas in 2014, intent on cutting waste from the city budget and fixing problems. She was an extremely popular candidate whose grassroots campaign was boosted by scores of dedicated volunteers, and given her expertise with numbers and lifelong activism she was thought by nearly all to be perfect for the job. However, two weeks before the election-entry deadline, a 24-year-old ethnic Mexican (Gregorio Casar) moved into town, signed up to run and beat Laura Pressley 2 to 1. With her mathematical skills, Dr. Pressley began to analyze the election results, saw odd patterns, and decided to file a lawsuit to decertify her opponent's victory. Her case -- the first in the country to produce direct evidence of electronic vote fraud -- has reached the Texas Supreme Court, and if she prevails, EVF will be blown open in America as never before. Please hear this amazing woman's story and support her ($15K of donations are needed!!) at PressleyForAustin.com. Read more here and here.
Listen here
To understand how EVF is done today, watch this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ezmpqwVEnM
another interview with Laura Pressley who was blatantly robbed of an Austin TX city counsel seat; Sean/SGT Report:
http://pressleyforaustin.com
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/B7bJgugoZfw/h...9cWKsewvW5tfkw 41:07
This HEROIC PATRIOT Needs Our Support -- Dr Laura Pressley
- 903 views
- 55 minutes ago
Interesting little story today, what's going on? Esp CIA has been 'meddling' in foreign elections since their inception; and surely have a hand in the pretend 'outcomes' of US elections, esp post-HAVA. JAssange tweeted about it,
https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/st...90598219292672
______________
The CIA Democrats
Introduction
By Patrick Martin
7 March 2018
PART ONE | PART TWO | PART THREE
This is the first part of a three-part article.
An extraordinary number of former intelligence and military operatives from the CIA, Pentagon, National Security Council and State Department are seeking nomination as Democratic candidates for Congress in the 2018 midterm elections. The potential influx of military-intelligence personnel into the legislature has no precedent in US political history.
If the Democrats capture a majority in the House of Representatives on November 6, as widely predicted, candidates drawn from the military-intelligence apparatus will comprise as many as half of the new Democratic members of Congress. They will hold the balance of power in the lower chamber of Congress.
Both push and pull are at work here. Democratic Party leaders are actively recruiting candidates with a military or intelligence background for competitive seats where there is the best chance of ousting an incumbent Republican or filling a vacancy, frequently clearing the field for a favored “star” recruit.
A case in point is Elissa Slotkin, a former CIA operative with three tours in Iraq, who worked as Iraq director for the National Security Council in the Obama White House and as a top aide to John Negroponte, the first director of national intelligence. After her deep involvement in US war crimes in Iraq, Slotkin moved to the Pentagon, where, as a principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, her areas of responsibility included drone warfare, “homeland defense” and cyber warfare.
https://www.wsws.org/asset/39fdc4e9-...ition=image480
Elissa Slotkin
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has designated Slotkin as one of its top candidates, part of the so-called “Red to Blue” program targeting the most vulnerable Republican-held seats—in this case, the Eighth Congressional District of Michigan, which includes Lansing and Brighton. The House seat for the district is now held by two-term Republican Representative Mike Bishop.
The Democratic leaders are promoting CIA agents and Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. At the same time, such people are choosing the Democratic Party as their preferred political vehicle. There are far more former spies and soldiers seeking the nomination of the Democratic Party than of the Republican Party. There are so many that there is a subset of Democratic primary campaigns that, with a nod to Mad magazine, one might call “spy vs. spy.”
The 23rd Congressional District in Texas, which includes a vast swathe of the US-Mexico border along the Rio Grande, features a contest for the Democratic nomination between Gina Ortiz Jones, an Air Force intelligence officer in Iraq, who subsequently served as an adviser for US interventions in South Sudan and Libya, and Jay Hulings. The latter’s website describes him as a former national security aide on Capitol Hill and federal prosecutor, whose father and mother were both career undercover CIA agents. The incumbent Republican congressman, Will Hurd, is himself a former CIA agent, so any voter in that district will have his or her choice of intelligence agency loyalists in both the Democratic primary and the general election.
CNN’s “State of the Union” program on March 4 included a profile of Jones as one of many female candidates seeking nomination as a Democrat in Tuesday’s primary in Texas. The network described her discreetly as a “career civil servant.” However, the Jones for Congress website positively shouts about her role as a spy, noting that after graduating from college, “Gina entered the US Air Force as an intelligence officer, where she deployed to Iraq and served under the US military’s ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy” (the last phrase signaling to those interested in such matters that Jones is gay).
According to her campaign biography, Ortiz Jones was subsequently detailed to a position as “senior advisor for trade enforcement,” a post President Obama created by executive order in 2012. She would later be invited to serve as a director for investment at the Office of the US Trade Representative, where she led the portfolio that reviewed foreign investments to ensure they did not pose national security risks. With that background, if she fails to win election, she can surely enlist in the trade war efforts of the Trump administration.
How this article was prepared
The House of Representatives is currently controlled by the Republicans, with a majority of 238 compared to 193 Democrats. There are four vacancies, one previously held by the Democrats. To reach a majority of 218 seats in the next Congress, the Democrats must have a net gain of 24 seats.
The DCCC has designated 102 seats as priority or competitive, including 22 seats where the incumbents are not running again (five Democrats and 17 Republicans), and 80 seats where Republican incumbents could be defeated for reelection in the event that polls predicting a sizeable swing to the Democrats in November prove accurate.
The World Socialist Web Site has reviewed Federal Election Commission reports filed by all the Democratic candidates in these 102 competitive districts, focusing on those candidates who reported by the latest filing date, December 31, 2017, that they had raised at least $100,000 for their campaigns, giving them a financial war chest sufficient to run in a competitive primary contest. In addition, there a few cases where a candidate had less than the $100,000 cutoff, but was unchallenged for the nomination, or where last-minute retirement or resignation has led to late entry of high-profile candidates without an FEC report on file. These have also been included.
The total of such candidates for the Democratic nomination in the 102 districts is 221. Each has a website that gives biographical details, which we have collected and reviewed for this report. It is notable that those candidates with a record in the military-intelligence apparatus, as well as civilian work for the State Department, Pentagon or National Security Council, do not hide their involvement, particularly in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They clearly regard working as a CIA agent in Baghdad, an Army special ops assassin in Afghanistan, or a planner for drone missile warfare in the White House or Pentagon as a star on their résumé, rather than something to conceal.
One quarter of all the Democratic challengers in competitive House districts have military-intelligence, State Department or NSC backgrounds. This is by far the largest subcategory of Democratic candidates. National security operatives (57) outnumber state and local government officials (45), lawyers (35), corporate executives, businessmen and wealthy individuals (30) and other professionals (19) among the candidates for Democratic congressional nominations.
Of the 102 primary elections to choose the Democratic nominees in these competitive districts, 44 involve candidates with a military-intelligence or State Department background, with 11 districts having two such candidates, and one district having three. In the majority of contests, the military-intelligence candidates seem likely to win the Democratic nomination, and, if the Democrats win in the general election, would enter Congress as new members of the House of Representatives.
There are some regional differences. In the Northeast, 21 of the 31 seats targeted by the Democrats have military-intelligence candidates. This area, not the South or Midwest, has the highest proportion of military-intelligence candidates seeking Democratic nominations.
In the West, only 7 of the 23 targeted seats have military-intelligence candidates, while in a half dozen seats the leading candidates are self-funded millionaires, mainly from the IT industry. There has been a wave of Republican retirements in California and wealthy people are bidding for these seats.
The military-intelligence candidates are disproportionately favored by the party apparatus, encouraged to run in districts that are the most likely takeover targets. Military-intelligence candidates account for 10 of the 22 districts selected for the most high-profile attention as part of the “red-to-blue” program, or nearly half. In some cases, military-intelligence candidates have amassed huge campaign war chests that effectively shut out any potential rivals, an indication that the financial backers of the Democratic Party have lined up behind them.
To be continued
PART TWO | PART THREE
MUST WATCH: Tim Canova - A Fight for FL District 23
12,080 views
1.2K 5 Share Save
https://yt3.ggpht.com/a-/AN66SAyq7DQ...ffffff-rj-k-noTracy Beanz
Published on Nov 23, 2018
This interview will definitely go down as one of the most important pieces I have done. Tim Canova has been fighting corruption and election fraud in earnest against Brenda Snipes and the machines of BOTH parties for three years. PLEASE watch and share this interview to raise awareness about what this amazing man has been doing to ensure elections with integrity for ALL of us.
52m: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq4qGnL-zGc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq4qGnL-zGc
new Whitney Webb, who did an exhaustive series on Epstein last Summer/Fall:
Why a Shadowy Tech Firm With Ties to Israeli Intelligence Is Running Doomsday Election Simulations
A shadowy tech firm with deep ties to Israeli intelligence and newly inked contracts to protect Pentagon computers is partnering with Lockheed Martin to gain unprecedented access to the heart of America’s democracy.
by Whitney Webb
Adam Green analyzes ^Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Operation BLACKOUT: Israel Hacking America 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDFg3ICq-cY
TruNews w guest Whitney Webb, 43 mins
Doomsday Election 2020: Israeli Spies Run Drill Predicting Overthrow of America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LW3vnrixxJs
recent Whitney Webb article re USA's joo election meddling prob,
https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb/sta...18758859067394
Whitney Webb @_whitneywebb
The unnerving conclusion to my 3-part series on Cybereason and foreign (and domestic) intel agencies meddling in the 2020 election with the apparent goal of annulling or cancelling it is now online:
How Government and Media Are Prepping America for a Failed 2020 Election
Russia, China and Iran are already being blamed for using tech to undermine the 2020 election. Yet, the very technologies they are allegedly using were created by a web of companies with deep ties to Israeli intelligence.
by Whitney Webb
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
I feel Rick Wiles really had the help of the Holy Spirit when he confronted yesterday, January 31 2020, that Israeli reporter, Cohen, about the spying and software of the Israelis.
Rick Wiles just received a phone call the same day of the interviews requesting him to be the guest on an RT show, so he had no preparation time for what I thought was his excellent testimony. He said he gets many such requests but almost always turns them down but he did accept yesterday. Rick Wiles was perfectly clear and outspoken and told it like it is. He left no big bombshell truth about Israel and the Mossad unmentioned. He covered every thing in an articulate poised way. Such a refreshing change from MSM and Fox News talking heads. Mr. Cohen just kept making the weak assertions over and over again and just looked like a pitiful joke.
This was a major breakthrough for truth about Israel technology and spy operations.
Rick Wiles also gave his Christian testimony and prayed for the Kingdom of Christ to take over the world and for Christ to help all the people of the world right now.
The silence was deafening in response to that.
https://twitter.com/MintPressNews/st...47893241827328
MintPress News
@MintPressNews
1h
SPECIAL REPORT: Despite #IowaCaucuses2020 fiasco, #Nevada#Democrats plan to use a new #software application for reporting results during the #NevadaCaucus scheduled for #February 22.
By: @_whitneywebb
https://mintpressnews.com/nevada-dem...oblems/264777/
https://twitter.com/DrREpstein/statu...14889584390144
Dr. Robert Epstein
@DrREpstein
Just out in @EpochTimes:
My latest take on the obscene threat that #BigTech companies pose to the free-and-fair election:
"Why Republicans Can't Win in 2020"
Forget the #Russians. They're not the problem. #election2020
February 24, 2020 Updated: February 24, 2020
Commentary
When it comes to election manipulation, left-leaning American technology companies make the Russians look like rank amateurs.
No matter which weak candidate the Democrats ultimately nominate, and even with Russia’s help, President Donald Trump can’t win the 2020 election. For that matter, in races nationwide in which the projected winning margins are small—say, under 5 percent or so—Republicans, in general, are likely to lose.
That’s because of new forces of influence that the internet has made possible in recent decades and that Big Tech companies—Google more aggressively than any other—have been determined to perfect since Armageddon Day—oh, sorry, Election Day—in 2016.
For the record, I’m neither a conservative nor a Trump supporter. But I love democracy and America more than I love any particular party or candidate, and rigorous research that I have been conducting since 2013 shows that Big Tech companies now have unprecedented power to sway elections.
While I cheer the fact that 95 percent of donations from tech companies and their employees go to Democrats, I can’t stand by and watch these companies undermine democracy. As long as I’m still breathing, I will do everything I can to stop that from happening—and, for the record, I’m NOT suicidal.
The threat these companies pose is far from trivial. For one thing, they can shift opinions and votes in numerous ways that people can’t detect.
Remember the rumors about that movie theater in New Jersey that got people to buy more Coke and popcorn using subliminal messages embedded into a film? Well, those rumors were a bit exaggerated—those messages actually had a minimal effect—but Google-and-the-Gang are now controlling a wide variety of subliminal methods of persuasion that can, in minutes, shift the voting preferences of 20 percent or more of undecided voters without anyone having the slightest idea they’ve been manipulated.
Worse still, they can use these techniques without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. In a leak of Google emails to the Wall Street Journal in 2018, one Googler asks his colleagues how the company can use “ephemeral experiences” to change people’s views about Trump’s travel ban.
Ephemeral experiences are those fleeting ones we have every day when we view online content that’s generated on-the-fly and isn’t stored anywhere: newsfeeds, search suggestions, search results, and so on. No authority can go back in time to see what search suggestions or search results you were shown, but dozens of randomized, controlled, double-blind experiments I’ve conducted show that such content can dramatically shift opinions and voting preferences. See the problem?
Speaking of content, I’m getting sick of seeing headlines about Russian interference in our elections. Unless the Russians suddenly figure out how to massively hack our voting machines—and shame on us if we’re incompetent enough to let that happen—there’s no evidence that bad actors such as Russia or the now-defunct Cambridge Analytica can shift more than a few thousand votes here and there. Generally speaking, all they can do is throw some biased content onto the internet. But content isn’t the problem anymore.
All that matters now is who has the power to decide what content people will see or will not see (censorship), and what order that content is presented in. That power is almost entirely in the hands of the arrogant executives at two U.S. companies. Their algorithms decide which content gets suppressed, the order in which content is shown, and which content goes viral. You can counter a TV ad with another TV ad, but if the tech execs are supporting one candidate or party, you can’t counteract their manipulations.
Forget the Russians. As I said when I testified before Congress last summer, if our own tech companies all favor the same presidential candidate this year—and that seems likely—I calculate that they can easily shift 15 million votes to that candidate without people knowing and without leaving a paper trail.
By the way, the more you know about someone, the easier it is to manipulate him or her. Google and Facebook have millions of pieces of information about every American voter, and they will be targeting their manipulations at the individual level for every single voter in every swing state. No one in the world except Google and Facebook can do that.
In President Eisenhower’s famous 1961 farewell address, he warned not only about the rise of a military-industrial complex; he also warned about the rise of a “technological elite” who could someday control our country without us knowing.
That day has come, my friends, and it’s too late for any law or regulation to make a difference—at least in the upcoming election. There’s only one way at this point to get these companies to take their digits off the scale, and that’s to do to them what they do to us and our children every day: monitor them aggressively.
We need to look over the shoulders of a diverse group of thousands of American voters—with their permission, of course—to aggregate and measure the ephemeral content that Google-and-the-Gang are showing them every day. When bias is detected that has the potential to shift votes, it needs to be reported immediately to the media, the Federal Election Commission, members of Congress, and other authorities. That will force the tech execs to back off; if they don’t, they’ll be risking humiliation, fines, and, quite possibly, criminal prosecution.
I’m building such a system now—a greatly expanded version of the monitoring systems I deployed in 2016 and 2018. If you value democracy, wish me luck, or, better yet, lend your support.
Robert Epstein, the former editor-in-chief of “Psychology Today,” is senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology. He has published 15 books and more than 300 articles on AI and other topics. To read Dr. Epstein’s full congressional testimony, click here. To learn more about or to support his research on online influence, visit MyGoogleResearch.com. Follow him on Twitter @DrREpstein.
PatColo, is this YOUR "latest take" "on the obscene threat that #BigTech companies pose to the free-and-fair election"Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
I and probably you and most on this forum are already well aware of the threat bigtech companies pose to free and fair elections. What do you find especially insightful about Dr. Epstein's insights? The harm they do goes far and beyond "free and fair elections" and the thing that is causing "obscene threat" is something that was in existence long before there was something called "bigtech". I am more concerned about the harm done to the abstract concepts of "free and fair".
Any GSUS member who posts this phrase with a straight face should be permabanned.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
:rolleyes:
Angelo John Gage interviews Whitney Webb, 69m:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QWA...ture=emb_title
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QWAgv3Bs4w
Cyber Treason with Whitney Webb
Today we are joined by writer, researcher, and former Mint Press contributor, Whitney Webb to discuss the cyber treason that is going on in our own big tech industries; specifically focusing on the company Cyber Reason and what their role is in all this, along other special interests undermining our country.
*** Whitney's Links ***
Twitter: https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/whitneywebbmpn
Her work: https://t.co/ISQlIao54R
Dr. Cynthia McKinney and Dr. Edwin Vieira on Dr. Vieira’s proposal for election integrity. About 40 minutes
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EX6MZcSWJiNk/