it seems the above clip was taken out of context
above clip starts at 2:25
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMzTcvXk1j4
Printable View
it seems the above clip was taken out of context
above clip starts at 2:25
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMzTcvXk1j4
article in Yahoo News this morning, about younger American Jews not supporting Israel - but it still promoted the Holohoax -
http://news.yahoo.com/why-fewer-youn...3Rpb25z;_ylv=3
"Raised within the Conservative movement, I learned at Hebrew school that Israel was the "land of milk and honey" where Holocaust survivors had irrigated the deserts and made flowers bloom."
when in fact, the Israel was created by Jewish terrorists - and Wall Street Jews who financed WW2 Germany.
The Heretics’ Hour: “Humanizing the Holocaust”
August 8, 2011
http://reasonradionetwork.com/images...h-maxrosie.jpg
Max and Rosie both won a trip to Auschwitz on the government-funded Lessons from Auschwitz Project organized by the HET, an organization of British Jews.
New ways to teach the “Holocaust” are being explored by the British Holocaust Education Trust (HET), among other groups. The idea is to touch the student’s emotions with personal visits to the camps, selected photographs especially of young people living normal lives before they were sent to a camp, and the tried and true survivor testimony. It’s all about transferring the desired emotional feelings since the battle for rational explanation of how the “Holocaust” happened is lost.
13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min. http://vornetwork.com/thumbs/download_footer.png http://vornetwork.com/thumbs/podcast_footer.png http://vornetwork.com/thumbs/archive_footer.png
there were 3.5 million Jewish people in Occupied Europe at the beginning of WW2. (from Sanning's book)
and they were emigrating to the US at the rate of 3000 a day (= 1 million a year) and to Israel at the rate of 300 a day (=100,000 a year).
plus many of them fled to Russia, though that didn't work out so great since the winter of 1944 was a "hundred year winter" (super-cold) and many of them perished.
in any case, there were no more than 2.4 million Jewish people for WW2 Germany to 'persecute'.
i would call the Holohoax teaching Child Abuse - making children contemplate a false horror, telling them it's real.
to go with one of the other forms of Child Abuse inflicted by the Talmud-worshippers - circumcision of male Gentiles.
I've said it before, the majority of the West's population who've been indoctrinated/terrorized/shamed by the official holohoax narrative, can rightly claim the designation:
HOLOHOAX SURVIVORS
as to "other forms of Child Abuse inflicted by the Talmud-worshippers", you know of course about Denver's "terrorism museum"... ?
Denver’s Terror Museum Under Scrutiny (UPDATE)
Connecticut is a state that rewards Zionists, such as Chris Dodd & his Pa.
one would think that they would PUNISH anybody who supported WW2 Germany.
Prescott Bush was found to be doing just that, loaning US $ to Mr. Hitler in October 1942 via the Harriman/Rothschild owned Union Bank in NYC
within 10 years, P. Bush was a Connecticut senator.
who's the other Conn. senator ? Joe Lieberman.
i'm surprised i ended up OK ;) given that i grew up in Connecticut & went to Conn. public schools.
Be careful what you say about my Uncle Adolf, I know he's in Heaven keeping the Neo Conns and the Zionists out.
Who was Alfred Rosenberg? You guessed it.......
Alfred Rosenberg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Rosenberg.jpg
Quote:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...peaker.svg.png Alfred Rosenberg (help·info) (12 January 1893 – 16 October 1946) was an early and intellectually influential member of the Nazi Party. Rosenberg was first introduced to Adolf Hitler by Dietrich Eckart; he later held several important posts in the Nazi government. He is considered one of the main authors of key Nazi ideological creeds, including its racial theory, persecution of the Jews, Lebensraum, abrogation of the Treaty of Versailles, and opposition to "degenerate" modern art. He is also known for his rejection of Christianity,[1] having played an important role in the development of Positive Christianity, which he intended to be transitional to a new Nazi faith.[2] At Nuremberg he was tried, sentenced to death and executed by hanging as a war criminal.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Rosenberg.jpgQuote:
Rosenberg became one of the earliest members of the German Workers Party (later the National Socialist German Workers Party, better known as the Nazi Party), joining in January 1919; Adolf Hitler did not join until October 1919. Rosenberg had also been a member of the Thule Society, with Eckart. After the Völkischer Beobachter became the Nazi party newspaper (December, 1920),
Rosenberg became its editor in 1923.[8] Rosenberg was a leading member of Aufbau Vereinigung, Reconstruction Organisation, a conspiratorial organisation of
White Russian émigrés which had a critical influence on early Nazi policy.[9]
In 1923, after the failed Beer Hall Putsch, Hitler—who had been imprisoned for treason—appointed Rosenberg as a leader of the Nazi movement, a position he held until Hitler's release. Hitler remarked privately in later years that his choice of Rosenberg, whom he regarded as weak and lazy, was strategic; Hitler did not want the temporary leader of the Nazis to be overly popular or hungry for power, because a person with either of those two qualities might not want to cede the party leadership after Hitler's release. However, at the time of the appointment Hitler had no reason to believe that he would soon be released, and Rosenberg had not appeared weak, so that this may been reading back into history his dissatisfaction with Rosenberg for the job he did.[10]
In 1929 Rosenberg founded the Militant League for German Culture. He later formed the "Institute for the Study of the Jewish Question", dedicated to identifying and attacking Jewish influence in German culture and to recording the history of Judaism from an antisemitic perspective. He became a Reichstag Deputy in 1930 and published his book on racial theory The Myth of the Twentieth CenturyDer Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts) which deals with key issues in the national socialist ideology, such as the "Jewish question". Rosenberg intended his book as a sequel to Houston Stewart Chamberlain's above-cited book. Despite selling more than a million copies by 1945, its influence within Nazism (beyond providing specious intellectual cover for unintellectual governance) remains doubtful. It is often said to have been a book that was officially venerated within Nazism, but that few actually read beyond the first chapter or even found comprehensible.[11][12] and disapproved of its pseudo-religious tone.[7] ( Hitler called it "stuff nobody can understand"
Rosenberg's attitude towards Soviet Bolshevism obviously[original research?] had some influence on Hitler. He convinced Hitler of the Communist threat and of the supposed fragility of the Soviet political structure. "Jewish-Bolshevism" was accepted as a target for Nazism during the early 1920s.[7]
Rosenberg was named leader of the Nazi Party's foreign political office in 1933, but he played little practical part in the role. His visit to Britain in that year was designed[by whom?] to reassure the British that the Nazis would not be a threat, and to encourage links between the new regime and the British Empire. It was a notable failure. When Rosenberg laid a wreath bearing a swastika at the tomb of the unknown soldier, a British war veteran threw it into the Thames.[13] In January 1934 Hitler granted Rosenberg responsibility for the spiritual and philosophical education of the Party and all related organizations.
Alfred Rosenberg at the Nuremberg trials. Rosenberg is first from right,Quote:
Hitler was a leader oriented towards practical politics, whereas, for Rosenberg, religion and philosophy were key and he was the most influential within the party.[31] Several accounts of the time before the Nazi ascension to power, indeed, speak of Hitler as being a mouthpiece for Rosenberg's views, and he clearly exerted a great deal of intellectual influence.[32]
Rosenberg's influence in the Nazi Party is controversial. He was perceived as lacking the charisma and political skills of the other Nazi leaders, and was somewhat isolated. In some of his speeches Hitler appeared to be close to Rosenberg's views: rejecting traditional Christianity as a religion based on Jewish culture, preferring an ethnically and culturally pure "Race" whose destiny was supposed to be assigned to the German people by "Providence". In others, he adhered to the Nazi Party line, which advocated a "positive Christianity".
After Hitler's assumption of power he moved to reassure the Protestant and Catholic churches that the party was not intending to reinstitute Germanic paganism. He placed himself in the position of being the man to save Positive Christianity from utter destruction at the hands of the atheistic antitheist Communists of the Soviet Union.[33] This was especially true immediately before and after the elections of 1932; Hitler wanted to appear non-threatening to major Christian faiths and consolidate his power. Further, Hitler felt that Catholic-Protestant infighting had been a major factor in weakening the German state and allowing its dominance by foreign powers.
Some Nazi leaders, such as Martin Bormann, were anti-Christian and sympathetic to Rosenberg.[34] Once in power, however, Hitler and most Nazi leaders sought to unify the Christian denominations in favor of "positive Christianity." They privately complained about Rosenberg's radical, openly anti-Christian views; they also did not support small neo-pagan groups that were seeking parity with Christianity, which Rosenberg encouraged. However, Goebbels and Hitler both agreed that after the Endsieg (Final Victory) the Reich Church should be pressed into evolving into a German social evolutionist organisation proclaiming the cult of race, blood and battle, instead of Redemption and the Ten Commandments of Moses, which they deemed outdated and Jewish.[35]
Heinrich Himmler's views were among the closest to Rosenberg's, and their estrangement was perhaps created by Himmler's abilities to put into action what Rosenberg had only written of.[36] Also, while Rosenberg thought Christianity should be allowed to die out, Himmler actively set out to create countering pagan rituals
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._rosenburg.jpg
Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson - he got into trouble last year for calling out the holohoax... German zio-kangaroo-court fined him several thousand euro for holohoax truth dissemination...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6C9BuXe2RM
German court upholds Holocaust-denying bishop's conviction | JTA ...
- "11 Jul 2011 ... A German court upheld the Holocaust denial conviction of a Catholic bishop from a breakaway sect, but lowered his fine. ... The Regensburg Appeals Court on Monday lowered the fine for Richard Williamson of the Society of ..."
www.jta.org/news/article/2011/07/11/3088493/german-court-upholds-holocaust-denying-bishops-conviction
In the first 20 mins of this Apr 2010 podcast, Carolyn Yeager interviews a German guy who attended Williamson's kangaroo-trial in Germany. He describes what a farce the rationale for Germany's prosecuting Williamson was (Williamson interview clip above was taped in Denmark...), and then the twisted games which went on in the kangaroo court to ensure they got some conviction...
As Large Sarge noted in a recent thread, besides Bishop Williamson's calling out the BIG LIE of the 20th century; he also called out the BIG LIE of the 21st century: the false flag attacks of 9/11, in a remarkably eloquent sermon:Quote:
The Heretics’ Hour: Günter Deckert on European Politics
April 26, 2010
http://reasonradionetwork.com/images...terDeckert.gif
Carolyn Yeager & Günter Deckert discuss European Politics. Topics include:
- Report from the Bishop Williamson heresy trial
- Disturbing developments in Holo revisionism (for Jews)
- Right-wing political parties: Successes and prospects
13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.
http://vornetwork.com/thumbs/download_footer.png http://vornetwork.com/thumbs/podcast_footer.png http://vornetwork.com/thumbs/archive_footer.png
Thread: Catholic Bishop tells the truth on 9/11 (WOW!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZyZT43IQtk
Tag and thanks for the links.
The Bishop looks absolutely terrified to speak his mind. I find this to be pathetic. Then, when the interviewer asks a leading question, that questioning the Holohoax is anti-semitism, the Bishop actually becomes defensive. I would have verbally slapped the interviewer around if he tried that tactic with me: "What do you mean by anti-semitism? Are you equating a subjective option with an objective inquiry? I see absolutely no connection between inquiring about the supposed mass execution by the Nazi during WWII and 'anti-semitism.' You'll have to expalin that gigantic leap of logic to me."
This from a guest writer @ Makow's site. Normally my main dig against Makow himself is his maintaining the official holohoax narrative, with some little critiques of how it's been "exploited" etc. This guest writer takes sort of a similar tact, basically giving the official narrative a pass, "some true some not", and "excusing" the Germans. The bogus "guilt trip" which the satanists have laid on Germans since WW2 is one of the most offensive aspects of the holohoax. "Judea's" worldwide economic war against German products in the '30s has been flushed down the memory hole.
America Suffered by Stigmatizing Germans
October 24, 2011
http://www.henrymakow.com/upload_ima...nvolksfest.jpg(left, An American couple of German descent.)
The Germany of the 1930s and 40s has been presented as uniquely monstrous. And virtually all Germans have been said to have been complicit in these crimes. It's called collective guilt...being German itself became a kind of sin -- one that requires continual expiation.
by Rollin Stearns
(henrymakow.com)
I learned recently that an old friend of mine has died.
Elisabeth von G. was German. During World War II as a young woman she lived in Munich, where she suffered much. After the war she went to Switzerland, where she studied psychology at the Jung Institute. She then came to the United States, where she worked as a therapist in New York City.
It was her hope to contribute, as best she could, to making the world a little more sane, and less prone to violence
I got to know Elisabeth in the 1960s. She was good at her work, and enjoyed life in NYC. But it had its downside. Holocaust propaganda kicked into high gear in the 60s with the Eichmann trial, the movie Judgement at Nuremberg, and the play The Deputy.
New York, of course, was largely Jewish. It may have been verboten to tell jokes with a Yiddish accent, but it was common to hear jokes (or rather, sarcastic comments) in a German accent. A German accent meant Nazi.
I didn't think anything of it myself until I got to know Elisabeth. That's when I first became aware of anti-German prejudice on a personal level.
Then, in the early 70s, Elisabeth moved back to Munich. She was tired to being on the defensive. She was German and always would be.
She lived in Munich until she died, continuing to practice as a therapist. As far as I know she never visited the U.S. again.
A DEMOGRAPHIC SURPRISE
Years later, in the 1980s, my wife and I were watching TV when the news anchor said he had something surprising to report. A survey had been done to determine the number of Americans from various national or ethnic backgrounds, such as English, Irish, black, etc.
He said English was still number one -- no surprise there -- though its dominance was declining. But then he announced that number two was... German-Americans, who have long been America's "invisible" ethnic group.
According to Wikipedia, "German Americans are citizens of the United States of German ancestry and comprise about 51 million people, or 17% of the U.S. population, the country's largest self-reported ancestral group.[1] California, Texas and Pennsylvania have the largest numbers of German origin, although upper Midwestern states, including Ohio, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Nebraska, and the Dakotas, have the highest proportion of German Americans at over one-third."
For a long time Americans of German background have not identified themselves -- at least publicly -- as a distinct ethnic group. They have worked hard to fully assimilate.
On one level this is commendable. Americans of German background have contributed much to our nation. But on a deeper level, this "invisibility" is a hidden wound that has cost them, and our country, dearly.
THE PSYCHIC WOUND
Not long after seeing this TV broadcast, my wife and I took part in a therapy group called Reevaluation Counseling (RC for short). At an introductory meeting there were about 10 or 15 of us sitting in a circle and we were asked when our turn came to give our name and a little information about ourselves, including our family's ethnic background.
No one had any difficulty with this, at first. But then it was the turn of a nice-looking young guy who seemed generally sociable. He gave his name, but then froze up when he had to say his family background was German. We were all a little puzzled. He was ashamed of the fact.
I think we all understood why.
Later, this was spelled out explicitly to my wife and I. A neighbor of ours was of Lebanese descent. His wife Janet was an outspoken and confident person of German origin. One evening she told us about a recent trip to Germany to visit relatives. (This was the first we knew her family background was German.)
She had never been to Germany before, and the biggest impact on her was when she had been driving on the autobahn. She had looked up and unexpectedly seen an exit sign that said -- matter of factly -- Dachau.
Janet said at that moment a feeling of shame swept over her, a feeling she was unprepared for and didn't know how to deal with. Nor did she know how to deal with it still.
HOLOCAUST
For two generations there has been a relentless attack on Germans through endless propaganda (some of it true, some not) about the Holocaust.
The Germany of the 1930s and 40s has been presented as uniquely monstrous. And virtually all Germans have been said to have been complicit in these crimes. It's called collective guilt.
Oh, occasionally it's allowed that there was a "good" German here and there, but these exceptions only highlight the guilt of other Germans, the ordinary Germans. So that being German itself became a kind of sin -- one that requires continual expiation.
But the problem actually began much earlier -- not with the Second World War but with the first, when America was first maneuvered into taking part in a European war on the side of Britain.
With the sinking of the Lusitania (when Winston Churchill was Lord of the Admiralty), war fever swept America. It was fanned by the press and its financial overlords, and by popular celebrities such as Douglas Fairbanks and Charlie Chaplin. When America entered the war, there were anti-German riots, and an effective suppression (legal as well as extra-legal) of German-Americans.
The literary and social critic Edmund Wilson writes about this in the introduction to his book, Patriotic Gore: "Bombarded by British propaganda and horrified by what we heard of the brutality of the Germans, with whom, nevertheless, we had a great deal in common and for whom throughout the nineteenth century we had expressed the highest admiration, we went in on the side of England.... This cost us ... a persecution of everything German in a country with an immense German population which had always been thought one of our more valuable elements, together with a hissing and hounding of every kind of opposition sentiment that outdid the repressions of Lincoln."
THE ILLUMINATI GAME
The Illuminati have traditionally had their center of power in Britain -- in the alliance of British aristocracy with Jewish finance (Winston Churchill -- the son of Lord Randolph Churchill, or Edward VII, and Jenny Jerome is a good example of this.) And that center was augmented by the Anglo-American establishment in America.
It was this Illuminati-dominated Anglo-American establishment that thwarted Germany's rise to preeminence in Europe. To establish a New World Order, it was necessary to crush German nationalism.
Industrially and technologically, Germany was the first and leading nation of the 20th century. But its challenge to Britain (which was the leading nation of the 19th century) was defeated in two world wars, once America was brought in on the British side. Twice Germany was demolished and reduced to vassal status. It was stripped of much of its territory and what remained was divided and occupied.
America replaced Germany as the leading industrial and technological nation (though America's preeminence in rocketry and space really was due to German scientists, and some believe that even our successful development of the nuclear bomb in July of 1945 was due to German expertise brought to America immediately after the defeat of Germany.)
CONCLUSION
Germans are no more collectively responsible for the Jewish holocaust than Jews are to blame for the Crucifixion of Christ or the rapacity of Illuminati Jewish bankers. Average Germans are no more to blame for German war crimes than Americans or English for American and British war crimes. Individuals are responsible. People with no knowledge or participation in the deed are not.
The Illuminati manipulate negative national characteristics for their own ends. They did this 75 years ago when Hitler exploited German nationalism and resentment over Versailles to cause Germany's ruin and to advance Illuminati design.
Today there is a resurgence of German pride and confidence. Germany is united again and the leader of Europe. And here in America, the German stereotypes have become outmoded. A return of ethnic pride among Americans of German heritage would be a healthy development.
In Europe, though, I'm not so sure. If the Illuminati succeed in manipulating German nationalism once again, things could get ugly and aggressive.
My friend Elisabeth worked hard all her life to restore a healthy pride in her fellow Germans. I only hope her efforts were not in vain.
--
Rollin Stearns is a former book editor who lives in Maine.
--
Also by Rollin Stearns "The Coming German Superpower"
Free Downloadable Books on the Holocaust Controversy
Ingrid Weckert, Jewish Emigration from the Third Reichhttp://vho.org/store/p/182s.jpg
Download: PDF: 817 KK - HTML-ZIP: later | Buy this item
Jewish emigration was welcomed by the German authorities of the Third
Reich. It was not some kind of wild flight, but rather a lawfully
determined and regulated matter. Weckert's booklet elucidates the
emigration process in law and policy, thereby augmenting the
traditionally received picture of Jewish emigration from Germany. The
accounts of Jews fleeing Germany in secret by night across some border
are untenable.
Don Heddesheimer, The First Holocaust. Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns With Holocaust Claims During And After World War One
Download: PDF: 3.8 MB - HTML-ZIP: 2.4 MB | Buy this item
Supported with many publications, in particular from The New York Times,
the author shows that between 1916 and the late 1920s, mainly American
Jewish organizations were claiming that up to six million Jews(!) would
suffer terribly in Eastern Europe and would face a holocaust if they did
not receive massive aid. http://vho.org/store/p/80s.jpg
THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY -- A Case For Open Debate | 0.5 MB | Buy this item
This folded legal size flyer is a perfect and inexpensive introduction
into the arguments of Holocaust revisionism, addressing topics like:
Historical Introduction / The Photographs / Documents / Eyewitness
Testimony / Auschwitz / Jewish Population Losses During World War II /
The Hidden Genocide / Examples of Propaganda / Political Correctness and
Revisionism.Info Brochure "the holocaust never happened"http://vho.org/store/p/86s.jpg
Download: PDF: 2 MB | Buy this item
This brochure is a more thorough introduction into revisionism. It answers questions like: What
is historical revisionism and why is it important? What is meant by
"The Holocaust" or "Shoah?" What does Holocaust revisionism claim? What
about those pictures of mountains of dead bodies in the concentration
camps? Does it really matter whether prisoners died from disease or
poison gas? Does it matter how many Jews were killed during the Third
Reich since even one thousand would have been too many?
Germar Rudolf, Lectures on the Holocaust. Controversial Issues Cross Examined
Download: PDF: 13.4 MB | Buy this item
Since 1991, German scholar Germar Rudolf does researching, publishing,
and lecturing on the Holocaust. This book offers the main arguments for
being skeptic about the Holocaust in a very sensitive way. All arguments
and counter-arguments are discussed in a virtual exchange with the
reader. The best introduction to revisionism one can find. http://vho.org/store/p/29s.jpg
Germar Rudolf (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust. The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and 'Memory', 2nd., revised paperback edition
Download: PDF: 16 MB - HTML-ZIP: 6 MB | Buy this item
Dissecting the Holocaust applies state-of-the-art scientific
technique and classic methods of detection to investigate the alleged
murder of millions of Jews by Germans during World War II. In 22
contributions of each ca. 30 pages, the 17 authors dissect generally
accepted paradigms of the ‘Holocaust’. It reads as exciting as a crime
novel. This is the intellectual adventure of the 21st century. http://vho.org/store/p/38s.jpg
Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf Report. Expert Report on Chemical and Technical Aspects of the "Gas Chambers" of Auschwitz
Download: PDF: 4.4 MB - HTML-ZIP: 1.4 MB | Buy this item as paperback | Buy this item as hardcover
The so-called Leuchter Report about the alleged gas chambers of
Auschwitz and Majdanek has been subject to massive, and partly
justified, criticism. Rudolf wrote a thorough forensic study about the
alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz which irons out the deficiencies and
discrepancies of the Leuchter Report. The Rudolf Report is the first English edition of this sensational scientific work. http://vho.org/store/p/53s.jpg
Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, third, revised and expanded edition
Download: PDF: 12.8 MB - HTML-ZIP: 2.25 MB | Buy this item
Professor A. R. Butz was the first (and so far the only) writer to treat
the entire Holocaust complex from the Revisionist perspective, in a
precise scientific manner. This book exhibits the overwhelming force of
historical and logical arguments which Revisionism had accumulated by
the middle of the 70s. This new edition comes with several supplements
adding new information. http://vho.org/store/p/85s.jpg
Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno, Auschwitz Lies. Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust. Download: PDF: 14.3 MB - HTML-ZIP: later | Buy this item
What do Prof. G. Wellers, Prof. J. Markiewicz, Prof. J. Roth, Dr. R.
Green, Prof. J. Zimmerman, and Prof. M. Shermer have in common? They all
tried to refute the scientific findings of Holocaust revisionism -- and
they all failed. This volume discusses these and more authors and
exposes their attempts at refutation as a mixture of scientific bungling
and fraud. http://vho.org/store/p/185s.jpg
good one from Gilad Atzmon,
Purim Special
From Esther to AIPAC
Gilad Atzmon; CounterPunch
http://uruknet.info/pic.php?f=azor_esther_ahasveros.jpg
http://uruknet.info/?p=m31096&s1=h1Quote:
[...] Philosopher Yeshayahu Leibowitz, the German born Hebrew University professor, was probably the first to suggest that the Holocaust has become the new Jewish religion. 'The Holocaust' is far more than historical narrative, it indeed contains most of the essential religious elements: it has its priests (Simon Wiesenthal, Elie Wiesel, Deborah Lipstadt, etc.) and prophets (Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu and those who warn about the Iranian Judeocide to come). It has its commandments and dogmas ('never again', 'six million', etc.). It has its rituals (memorial days, Pilgrimage to Auschwitz etc.). It establishes an esoteric symbolic order (kapo, gas chambers, chimneys, dust, Musselmann, etc.). It has its shrines and temples (Yad Vashem, the Holocaust Museum and now the UN). If this is not enough, the Holocaust religion is also maintained by a massive economic network and global financial infrastructures (Holocaust industry a la Norman Finkelstein). Most interestingly, the Holocaust religion is coherent enough to define the new 'antichrists' (the Deniers) and it is powerful enough to persecute them (Holocaust denial laws).
[...]
"History is written by the victors."- Winston Churchill.
Enough said..
World War II casualties of the Soviet Union from all related causes are commonly estimated in excess of 20,000,000,
Soviets lost heaps more people in the war and how often do you hear them whining about it ..............Jews are soft belly aches.
Tag......
My question is... Why is there a holocaust museum in NYC... and in Wash DC? Why not israel?
What possible point is there to rub that kind of horror in the guise of a museum at the people who reportedly liberated the so called survivors from the camps! A lot of things dont add up... and just because somebody says something happened a certain way without corroboration it has no validity.
I am sure many horrors happened in and around the camps... War is a really $hitty business!!! but as I said there are a lot of things that just dont add up. And going to a so called holocaust museum to find facts... well thats not my idea of a non biased source of information.
THE NAZI ZIONIST PARTY AND THE HOLOCAUST
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO5sbwGCR7A
Anyone familiar with Mullins' take on the holohoax? In the above clip, apparently from year 2000, he speaks of it unquestioningly. Do any of his writings question the alleged German mass-genocide agenda, the gas chambers, or the 6MM number?Quote:
Uploaded by joggler66 on Jan 1, 2012
Eustace Mullins explains connection between the
NAtional socialists and ZIonists. The result is a NAZI Party
which rules the world today....
Eustace Mullins in Salmon Arm BC, Canada, August 2000.
I certainly can't speak for Mullins but I'm sure that if he researched the facts, he was aware that the 6 million figure was an outright falsehood and was bandied about many times before world war 2 in relation to Jewish suffering. The gas chambers were also a ridiculous falsehood. As he stated in the vid, the German people knew nothing of the program to use the Jews as sacrificial offerings (note the name 'holocaust' means 'burnt offering'). They were killed by Zionists as were about 50 to75 million innocent non-Jews.
In Mullins' Ziopedia write-up, the "anti-Semitism" section, it says:
heh, the whole "anti-Semitism" section of Mullins' wikipedia write-up is worth a read.Quote:
In a tract called The Secret Holocaust, Mullins stated that the account of the Nazi extermination of the Jews is implausible, and that it is a cover story for the Soviet massacres of Christians, which he believed was led by a conspiracy of "international Jews" and instigated for the purpose of killing Gentiles.[citation needed]
Re: "ZioPedia", bear in mind,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x2DFnGI9Ac
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x2DFnGI9Ac
I have a book called "Debating the Holocaust: A new look at both sides" by Thomas Dalton. While the author claims to be unbiased on multiple occasions, any discerning reader can see his bias against jews. However, there is a section in there that displays all the occurances throughout history in which the jews (Khazarian) have used the 6 million number as leverage for sympathy and leway.
So many times in fact, that the race would have been wiped out completely by now on multiple occasions if the numbers are actually ran in a realistic senerio (Which the author does by crunching the numbers baised on populations at said times). The number is a falsehood; a lie that has been used again and again because the lie has worked so many times in the past.
I keep meaning to transcribe the paragraphs here, but I keep forgetting.
From this thread:
What Was The Holocaust... What Actually Happened?
Post #14
Not the same info Dmac. I will try to make a point of transcribing it here. It's much more compact that all that. More like a list.
Thanks for that vid Pat, another great post by you as usual.
I cant believe that vid is even real. Everyone here should watch that video! They are literally giving training classes in Israel to teach them how to edit wikipedia. But really they mean control all of the information about israel and jews online. INCREDIBLE.
Then the interviews with the people who are admitting that they make sure anything about Israel has a Zionist slant to it.
"I just want to make sure it is balanced and Zionist in nature". - Yes he really said that. Amazing.
"I tried to edit something that was against israel, and changes were erased or undone." - Yeah, but were they TRUE?
"There isnt enough of us (Jews) online to defend ourselves" - Yeah but you own/control the world, and that isnt enough?
BBC
23 January 2012
Treblinka: Revealing the hidden graves of the Holocaust
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...nka_ap624b.jpg
Any doubts about the existence of mass graves at the Treblinka death camp in Poland are being laid to rest by the first survey of the site using tools that see below the ground, writes forensic archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls.
When the Nazis left Treblinka in 1943 they thought they had destroyed it. They had knocked down the buildings and levelled the earth. They had built a farmhouse and installed a Ukrainian "farmer". They had planted trees, and - contemporary reports suggest - lupins.
But if they thought they had removed all evidence of their crime, they hadn't. For a forensic archaeologist, there is a vast amount to study.
The destruction of buildings rarely results in the complete removal of all traces of them. And even on the surface there are still artefacts and other subtle clues that point to the real purpose of the site.
A 1946 report by investigators into German crimes in Poland found "a cellar passage with the protruding remains of burnt posts, the foundations of the administration building and the old well" and here and there "the remains of burnt fence posts, pieces of barbed wire, and short sections of paved road".
They also discovered human remains as they dug into the ground, and on the surface "large quantities of ashes mixed with sand, among which are numerous human bones".
Despite this, in a later statement they said they had discovered no mass graves.
The existence of mass graves was known about from witness testimony, but the failure to provide persuasive physical evidence led some to question whether it could really be true that hundreds of thousands of Jews were killed here.
Although they lasted only a few days, those post-war investigations remained the most complete studies of the camp until I began my work at Treblinka in 2010.
This revealed the existence of a number of pits across the site.
Mapping the Treblinka death camp
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...blinka_464.gif
About 800,000 Jews - almost one in six victims of the Holocaust -
were slaughtered at Treblinka between spring 1942 and August 1943
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image..._464_clean.gif
An aerial shot from late 1943, after the camp's closure, shows an empty site,
apart from the "farmhouse" (top left) made of bricks from the gas chambers :o
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/image...64_keyed_2.gif
Victims arrived at a fake railway station, and were made to undress and
walk naked to the gas chambers along the "Road to Heaven"
Some may be the result of post-war looting, prompted by myths of buried Jewish gold, but several larger pits were recorded in areas suggested by witnesses as the locations of mass graves and cremation sites.
One is 26m long, 17m wide and at least four metres deep, with a ramp at the west end and a vertical edge to the east.
Another five pits of varying sizes and also at least this deep are located nearby. Given their size and location, there is a strong case for arguing that they represent burial areas.
My research has been designed to respect both the historical and scientific potential of the site as well as its religious and commemorative significance.
No excavation was carried out and the ground was not disturbed, which would be a violation of Jewish law and tradition, banning the exhumation of the dead.
Until relatively recently the technology has not been available to investigate the sites of the Holocaust in such a way.
Aerial photography from the 1940s can now be supplemented with satellite imagery, GPS and mapping software.
A range of geophysical surveying tools also exists, including ground penetrating radar, resistance survey and electrical imaging.
However, no geophysical methods will reveal conclusively what is below the soil - they do not detect human remains.
What each method does is to highlight contrasts between the physical properties of the soil and features within it, such as buried remains or ground disturbance.
Conclusions can then be drawn about the nature of these features by comparing historical and archaeological data, and drawing on knowledge about construction, demolition and burial processes.
As well as the pits, the survey has located features that appear to be structural, and two of these are likely to be the remains of the gas chambers. :o
According to witnesses, these were the only structures in the death camp made of brick.
Unlike at Auschwitz, there were no purpose-built crematoria at Treblinka.
The decision to burn the bodies of victims was made only after the camp had been operating for several months. The order to exhume and cremate those already buried came in 1943, after the German army had discovered the bodies of Polish officers massacred by the Soviets at Katyn three years earlier - demonstrating to the German leadership the importance of covering up its own crimes.
Witness reports indicate that the bodies were burned on improvised pyres made of railway lines and wood, and the ashes were often reburied in the same graves the bodies had been taken from.
But recent work in forensic cremation demonstrates that total eradication of bone requires extremely high temperatures. In most crematoria today, bones remain intact and have to be ground down to produce ash.
At Treblinka it is clear that the ash contains many bones. Bone fragments can still be seen on the surface of the ground, especially after rain.
Considerable evidence also exists to suggest that not all of the bodies were exhumed and cremated. Photographs show bodies littering the landscape as late as the early 1960s.
But this work is just the beginning and further work is required to understand the complexity of the site.
This initial survey should be viewed as a start of what will hopefully be a long-term collaboration between myself and the Treblinka museum, aimed at providing new insights into the physical evidence, and allowing the victims of the Holocaust to be appropriately commemorated.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16657363
from Jan 3, '11:
VETERANS TODAY BANS WIKIPEDIA REFERENCES FROM SITE
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont....-03-10.36.jpg
WIKIPEDIA MUST BE BLOCKED FROM THE UNITED STATES FOR “INTELLECTUAL TERRORISM”
“WIKIPEDIA THE REAL THREAT, NOT WIKILEAKS”
Editorial Staff VETERANS TODAY
The government of Israel, part of a well organized and funded intelligence operation, has designated millions of dollars to undermine the integrity of Wikileaks and to systematically attack, through hacking, spam, server overloads and “pressure” on journalists, all internet content that isn’t biased in favor of Israel.
more: VETERANS TODAY BANS WIKIPEDIA REFERENCES FROM SITE | Veterans Today
Haha, good for a laugh anyways. Should be writing for the Onion.
words escape me... see short embedded video at link:
Pa. Bishop Does Not Recant Saying that Hitler And Mussolini 'Would Love Our (Public School) System'
By Patrick Burke
February 6, 2012
(CNSNews.com) – The Catholic bishop of Harrisburg, Pa., has apologized for offending anyone with his recent comments that Hitler and Mussolini “would love” the public school system in Pennsylvania, because it is similar to what they sought to create in their totalitarian states.
But in a statement issued by the diocese of Harrisburg, Bishop Joseph McFadden did not retract comments he made during an interview on Jan. 24 with WHTM-TV, the ABC affiliate in Harrisburg.
The bishop made a comparison between the interests of the public school system and totalitarianism, while discussing what he sees as a lack of school choice in Pennsylvania.
“In the totalitarian government, they would love our system,” McFadden said. “This is what Hitler and Mussolini and all them tried to establish -- a monolith; so all the children would be educated in one set of beliefs and one way of doing things.”
McFadden’s comments drew immediate criticism from the Anti-Defamation League and the American Civil Liberties Union – which complained that the bishop had raised the specter of the Holocaust.
http://www.toqonline.com/wp-content/...ws_whining.jpg
"We respect the Bishop and his position in the Church. We appreciate his commitment the education of children and the viability of Catholic schools. However, he should not be making his point at the expense of the memory of six million Jews and millions of others who perished in the Holocaust," Barry Morrison, Eastern Pennsylvania/Southern New Jersey regional director of the Anti-Defamation League.
"The Holocaust was a unique experience. It does not lend itself to inappropriate analogies. We have an obligation to protect the memory of those who suffered because of it from those who would distort it and undermine and trivialize the history of the Holocaust, however inadvertently. Our role should be to honor those who fought to defeat the murderous Nazis, and not to inappropriately draw reckless comparisons."
Andy Hoover, legislative director of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, called McFadden’s comments, “completely inappropriate.”
In a statement on the Diocese of Harrisburg Web site, the bishop issued an apology to anyone who was offended by his remarks, but went on to explain and justify his references to Hitler and Mussolini:
“To those who may have been offended by my remarks, I apologize to them assuring them that I purposely did not mention the holocaust,” the bishop said.
“The reference to dictators and totalitarian governments of the 20th century which I made in an interview on the topic of school choice was to make a dramatic illustration of how these unchecked monolithic governments of the past used schools to curtail the primary responsibility of the parent in the education of their children,” he said.
“Today many parents in our state experience the same lack of freedom in choosing an education that bests suits their child as those parents oppressed by dictators of the past. I intentionally did not make reference to the holocaust in my remarks,” McFadden added.
McFadden said the Catholic Church “recognizes the holocaust as a terrible atrocity and evil emanated against humanity and especially those who were the victims of these crimes,” adding that “I would never minimize or trivialize the devastating suffering that took place.”
But the bishop did not actually refer to the Holocaust in the broadcast -- a fact he pointed out in his letter.
“I used the example of the dictators merely to explain how an absolute monopoly in education, where parents do not have a right or ability to choose the education that best suits their children due to economic circumstances or otherwise, runs counter to a free and open society,” he said.
“Our support of a school voucher program has the goal of giving parents something that dictators never would, a choice in which school their children attend by being able to control the portion of the tax dollars that is designated for the education of each child.
Back in December, the Pennsylvania Legislature rejected a proposal backed by by Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett that would have created a school voucher program.
If enacted, students in the worst public schools of Pennsylvania would have been given vouchers so their parents could afford to send them to schools of better quality and performance. The measure died.
Jonathan Butcher, education director at the Phoenix-based Goldwater Institute, which champions school choice, told CNSNews.com that choice is essential if students are not to be trapped in schools.
“The goal here is to provide the best quality set of educational options that we can, and that’s going to differ from student to student," Butcher said. "A student who goes to a failing school should not just have to rely on their assigned public school.”
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pa-b...-public-school
The Documents
The Nazis kept meticulous records in the camps, including death certificates for every prisoner that died, http://www.holohoax101.com/Plaque1.jpg and 'Death Books' summarizing the deaths. The Soviets captured the Auschwitz records but hid them for 45 years. A stone plaque was placed at the Auschwitz entrance stating that 4 million had died there.
In the early 90's the Russians released the documents. Samples, and a summary analysis, can be seen here http://www.holohoax101.com/Plaque2.jpg http://www.holohoax101.com/auschwitzrecords/. The data shows that more Roman Catholics died at Auschwitz than Jews. The old stone plaque stating that four million had died was replaced by the plaque shown to the left claiming that one and a half million had died. The new number was not documented; based on the documents the figure should be on the order of (some months are missing) one hundred thousand.
Remarkably, (or not), the six million total for Jewish victims of the holocaust was not affected.
The documents captured by the British and US forces, over sixty million documents, have been kept secret to all accept the holohoax 'authorities' at Bad Arolsen to this day.
http://www.holohoax101.com/
Eustace tells all on the holohoax
from Holocaustianity-Heretic Robert Faurisson's unofficial blog, not sure of his life story, only he's French University prof and was beaten up a few years ago by zio-thugs, hospitalized. He must not live in France anymore, coz they forbid holohoax truth dissemination there. Also not sure why DBS @ iamthewitness linked to this- it would appear to jeopardize DBS as he's allegedly in France? anyways:
Friday, February 3, 2012
Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism
The term Hollywoodism refers to the transformation, often mendacious, of reality by the spirit and practices of a whole sphere of American cinema. At first, I shall discuss the evil in general done by Hollywoodism. Secondly, I shall describe the wrongs of Hollywoodism in the shaping of the imposture of “the Holocaust”, that is in building the myth of genocide, gas chambers and six million Jews killed by the Germans during the Second World War. Finally, in a third and last part I shall speak of Revisionism as the antidote par excellence to Hollywoodism and its incessant, aggressive publicity for the religion of “the Holocaust”.
1. Hollywoodism and the evil that it does
According to the American Heritage Dictionary, “Hollywood” may signify “the US film industry” but also “a flashy, vulgar atmosphere or tone, held to be associated with the US film industry”. Used as an adjective the word stands for “the US film industry”, as in “a Hollywood movie, a Hollywood producer,” or means “flashy and vulgar”, as in the dictionary’s illustrative sentence “Flashy and vulgar, their clothes were pure Hollywood.”
A well-known facet of the ideology propagated by this film industry is the basic division of the world between the Good and the Bad. The Good are the United States and the Bad are those whom the United States decrees as such. The Good are fundamentally Good and the Bad are fundamentally Bad. The United States is always in the right and always wins, whilst the “Bad Guys” are always in the wrong and always lose. Thus there cannot, there must not be any pity for the vanquished: their defeat proves that they were indeed criminals. The winners will independently assume the right to try the vanquished in court or to have them put on trial by others.
Everyone can bring to mind what are known as “the Nazi atrocities”, especially the images of walking corpses or corpses proper. For the past 67 years Hollywood has presented them as evidence that the Germans had death factories wherein the SS spent their time killing, especially Jews. In reality, those corpses were proof that because of the systematic destruction of German cities by the Allies, Germany in 1945 was in its death throes: the inhabitants who had survived the deluge of steel and fire were living in rubble or in holes in the ground, exposed to cold and hunger; often there was hardly any food or medicine; the hospitals and schools were destroyed; practically no trains and convoys were running any longer; the refugees from the East terrified by the invading Red Army’s murder and rape numbered in the millions. In 1948 the Italian director Roberto Rossellini faithfully described this situation in Germania, Anno Zero. Therefore one must not be surprised at the fact that in 1945, in the labour camps or concentration camps, famine and disease (typhus, typhoid fever, dysentery) reigned, whilst medicines and disinfectants such as Zyklon B were sorely lacking.
Hollywood, along with British cinema and Soviet propaganda, had a terrible and direct responsibility both in the lies attending what was called the discovery of the German concentration camps (1945) and in the ignoble “lynching party” (the phrase is that of Harlan Fiske Stone, Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court at the time) that was the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), where the winners of the war, in coalition, made themselves judges and jury to try the defeated. It is altogether true that in 1945 even a privileged concentration camp like that of Bergen-Belsen offered a nightmarish vision. But the horrors discovered there were not created by the Germans. They were due to the war and, in particular, an air war conducted mercilessly, to the end, by the Allies against… civilians. It took a fine cynicism to show those horrors and point an accusing finger at the defeated when the ones mainly responsible were the US Air Force and the Royal Air Force. In April 1945, no longer able to manage, the commandant of Bergen-Belsen, SS captain Josef Kramer, sent some men to meet the advancing troops of British Marshal Montgomery and warn them that they were approaching a terrible den of infection, and that they should not immediately release the prisoners lest they contaminate the civilian population and the British soldiers. The British agreed to work with the Wehrmacht. Once on the site, they kept the detainees there and tried to treat them but mortality remained appalling high for a long time. The British wanted to know how many inmates were buried in the mass graves. They extracted the corpses and counted them; then, using a bulldozer, a British officer pushed the bodies towards six large ditches where the soldiers forced female SS guards to cast them in with their bare hands. But this reality was very soon transformed by the film propaganda services, which had people believe that the bodies were those of people killed in an alleged extermination programme. A photograph taken from a plane and showing the bulldozer from afar made it possible to convey the impression that the vehicle was driven by a German soldier performing his daily work as an employee of a death factory. In one case, a photo taken from up close showed the bottom of the machine pushing corpses but “beheaded” the driver so that, with him not appearing as a Briton, it was reckoned he was a German. The Americans went on to make more and more falsifications of this kind. The American general Eisenhower, supreme Allied commander, was the impresario of this intensified Hollywoodism. The famous Hollywood film director George C. Stevens was brought to Germany in the uniform of lieutenant-colonel. His team shot 80,000 feet of film from which 6,000 feet (or 7.5% of the total) were selected for General William Donovan, special assistant to the US chief of counsel at Nuremberg. It was those parts carefully selected by the American prosecution which, on November 29, 1945, practically at the lifting of the curtain of the loathsome “Nuremberg Trial”, were projected to a stupefied world; some of the German defendants, most disturbed at what they saw, deduced that Hitler had carried out a gigantic crime behind their backs. In this sense it can be said that the “Nuremberg Trial” marked the triumph of Hollywoodism.
2. Hollywoodism’s part in creating the myth of “the Holocaust”
“The Holocaust” of the Jews then became a sort of religion whose three main components are the extermination, the gas chambers and the six million martyrs. According to an article of faith of this religion Hitler ordered and planned the methodical slaughter of all European Jews; in so doing he committed a crime without precedent, a specific crime, later called genocide. Then, in order to commit this specific crime, he had a specific weapon developed, a weapon of mass destruction, the gas chamber, operating especially with a powerful insecticide, Zyklon B, whose active ingredient was hydrogen cyanide. Finally, the result of this enormous crime was the death of six million European Jews. The Auschwitz-Birkenau camp was the focal point, the apogee, the Golgotha of that horror. After the war a whole propaganda developed around this holy trinity of “the Holocaust”, a whole industry of “the Holocaust”, a whole business: the “Shoah Business”. In the United States the film industry has fed on this belief and spread it throughout the Western world. It is especially since 1978 that such propaganda has been developed, particularly with the four episodes of the U.S. miniseries Holocaust recounting the saga of the Weiss family. It is no exaggeration to say that the showing of that series became, as of 1979, practically mandatory in an entire portion of the world. It triggered a torrent of films including, by Steven Spielberg, Schindler's List, by Roberto Benigni, Life is Beautiful, by Roman Polanski, The Pianist. In France, in 1985, Claude Lanzmann honoured us with a documendaciary running for over nine hours: Shoah. The number of Emmy Awards, Oscars and other prizes given to films like these is staggering. A mogul of the Entertainment Industry, Andrew Wallenstein, once stated in The Hollywood Reporter: “Let’s just say it: the real reason we see so many of these movies is that they’re awards bait.” It is such observations that have given rise to the saying “There's No Business Like Shoah Business,” inspired by the refrain of the song, sung by Liza Minnelli amongst others, “There’s No Business Like Show Business.”
3. Revisionism is an antidote to the poison of Hollywoodism
Revisionism is not an ideology but a remedy for the temptation of ideology. It is a method. Whether in matters of literature, science, history, the media or any human activity whatsoever, it prescribes that the reality of a fact be established prior to any considerations on that fact. One must again see, hear, read what is believed to have been seen, heard or read. One must be wary of first impressions, of emotions, rumours, and must not rely on anything or anyone until one’s own thorough investigation has been conducted, all the more if one is studying a war rumour for – let us not forget –, in wartime the first casualty is the truth.
In the little time I have left here I cannot, unfortunately, describe how and at what price in fifty years of research I, along with a good number of other revisionists, have come to the conclusion that “the Holocaust” is decidedly but a gigantic imposture, as I was able to convince myself after a few years. Already on December 17, 1980 I had summarised this conclusion in a sentence of sixty French words of which I do not see a single one that needs removing today. Here is the English translation: “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
To get an idea of the spectacular victories won against that imposture thanks to the revisionists’ work, one may refer to two studies appearing in my blog: “The Victories of Revisionism” (conference paper for Tehran, December 11, 2006) and “The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011). It is no exaggeration to say that currently, in France and elsewhere, the authors who used to defend the “Holocaust” thesis are in complete disarray. The trouble is that censorship and repression still prevent the general public from becoming aware of this good news, but with the Internet, times are changing, and quickly.
Conclusion
The general belief on the part of the Western world in “the Holocaust” has long been the sword and shield of Zionism. But today Revisionism is putting this belief in peril. This conference on Hollywoodism will mark, I think, one more step in our common struggle, a struggle for the rights of all – especially the Palestinians –, a struggle for the whole world to free itself from a tyranny based on the Greatest Lie of modern times.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trc8mw58x5Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trc8mw58x5Q
Quote:
Uploaded by chasluim34 on Mar 29, 2011
Because of the many atrocities committed by the Jewish-directed Allies, not only the firestorm incineration of German civilians in many German cities, but the incineration of hundreds' of thousands of Japanese civilians in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Operation Keelhaul, the murder of one million anti-Communist Russians who were ordered handed over to the Soviet executioners by Eisenhower, and many other horrors, it was necessary to invent a German atrocity which would eclipse these horrors. .......The "extermination" of the Jews seemed made to order.
Professor Frederick Lindemann, the Chief Advisor to Winston Churchill and the inspiration and architect of the air crucifixion of Germany was in a reflective mood after the war.
"Towards the end of his life the Prof.' (Lindemann) made a remark on more than one occasion with such an air of seriousness that he seemed to regard it as his testament of wisdom, and I accordingly feel it incumbent upon me to record it here, although not in perfect sympathy with it. 'Do you know,' he asked, 'what the future historians will regard as the most important event of this age?"' Well, what is it? 'It will not be Hitler and the Second World War, it will not be the release of nuclear energy, it will not be the menace of Communism.' These negatives seemed very comprehensive. He put on an expression of extreme severity and turned down the corners of his lips. 'It will be the abdication of the White man.' Then he nodded his head up and down several times to drive home his proposition."
Holocaust over Dresden, known as the Florence of the North. Dresden was a hospital city for wounded soldiers. Not one military unit, not one anti-aircraft battery was deployed in the city. Together with the 600,000 refugees from Breslau, Dresden was filled with nearly 1.2 million people. Churchill had asked for "suggestions how to blaze 600,000 refugees". He wasn't interested how to target military installations 60 miles outside of Dresden. More than 700,000 phosphorus bombs were dropped on 1.2 million people. One bomb for every 2 people. The temperature in the centre of the city reached 1600o centigrade. More than 260,000 bodies and residues of bodies were counted. But those who perished in the centre of the city can't be traced. Appr. 500,000 children, women, the elderly, wounded soldiers and the animals of the zoo were murdered in one night.
"Even the "hundred thousand" figure for those reported missing must be an under-estimate. There were over half a million homeless refugees in the streets of Dresden, fleeing the Red Army siege of Breslau to the East. Whole refugee families must have been engulfed by the Dresden holocaust, with nobody surviving to report them as "missing"."--David Irving
During the war, more bombs by weight were dropped on the city of Berlin than were released on the whole of Great Britain during the entire war.
All German towns and cities above 50,000 population were from 50% to 80% destroyed. Hamburg was totally destroyed and 70,000 civilians died in the most appalling circumstances. Cologne with a population greater than Glasgow's was turned into a moonscape. As Hamburg burned the winds feeding the three-mile high flames reached twice hurricane speed to exceed 150 miles per hour. On the outskirts of the city trees three feet in diameter were sucked from the ground by the supernatural forces of these winds and hurled miles into the city-inferno, as were vehicles, men, women and children.
Between 1940 and 1945, sixty-one German cities with a total population of 25 million souls were destroyed or devastated in a bombing campaign that was unquestionably initiated by the British government.
There are no final figures on the number of civilians killed as a result of the mass-bombing, but 3,000,000 would be a very restrained figure (estimate).
Destruction on this scale had no other purpose than the indiscriminate mass murder of as many German people as possible quite regardless of their civilian status. It led to bombing retaliation that resulted in 60,000 British dead and 86,000 injured. All German air attacks against Britain were in retaliation against Britain's air war. It was Germany that was at bay.
"A nation which spreads over another a sheet of inevitably deadly gases or eradicates entire cities from the earth by the explosion of atomic bombs, does not have the right to judge anyone for war crimes; it has already committed the greatest atrocity, equal to no other atrocity; it has killed - amidst unspeakable torments - hundreds of thousands of innocent people."
"As for crimes against humanity, those governments which ordered the destruction of German cities, thereby destroying irreplaceable cultural values and making burning torches out of women and children, should also have stood before the bar of justice," - Hon Jaan Lattik, the Estonian statesman, diplomat and historian.
There was a Holocaust in the 20th Century; not the fraud and lie about 6 million Jewish victims of the Nazis. Rather, 10s of millions of Russian Christians were brutally and systematically killed by the Jews (known to some of you by the synonym Bolshevik Communists) using execution, torture and starvation. The Jews sought to literally destroy Christianity in Russia; their bloodlust knew no limits. This history is virtually unknown to Americans and Europeans today, thanks to suppression by our Jewish overlords who are more than happy to parrot the '6 million Jews' Holohoax but are totally indifferent to the wrongful slaughter of over 30 million Russians whose only crimes were being Christian and not-Communist. The internet has changed all that. Here is the book that chronicles what happened at the hands of the Jews: read it, copy it, distribute it. Tell the world what happened, that these true Christain martyrs shall not have perished in vain.
Under the Sign of the Scorpion - Zugzwanged.org
Here's just one example corroborating that Jews ran the Communist party in Russia: http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com.../videos/20.wmv
All the Commissars and Politruks implanted with the Russian army in the field were Jews. Of course, these political officers Jews never got their uniforms dirty and never used their guns: they were content to let the goyim do the fighting and dying.
Mamboni, if I could thank you more than once for one post, I surely would. You have captured the true and most important flavor of these vile criminals and their campaign against all of us. They kill tens of millions if not more and then turn and place blame upon the innocent (us, we are supposed to feel guilty for the slaughter they effected), all the while continuing their aggressive machinations. The old adage rings true "The Jew cries out as he is striking you." Although I would tend to replace the word Jew with the word Khazar. Since all the world and they themselves identify as Jews (they are not), I guess that term will have to serve.