Printable View
Jeb! dropped the "Bush", knowing it was a liability; then when that didn't work, he tried reversing course and started appearing with Dim W. Son himself... Jeb! just can't win... :(Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
3m 31s:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqcxNVeLAV4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqcxNVeLAV4
2 hours; first 90 mins is mostly election fraud peppered with Trump's situation; last ~30 mins is all Trump talk.
See show links below & open RR page for developing reader comments:
The Realist Report – Jim Condit, Jr.
February 19, 2016 Realist Report Leave a comment
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...t-Friend-2.jpg
Jim Condit, Jr. and John Friend at the Jim Traficant Memorial Tribute in Washington, D.C.
On this edition of The Realist Report broadcast live on Renegade Broadcasting, we’re joined by Jim Condit, Jr. Jim and I discussed a number of topics, including the 2016 presidential campaign, Jim’s website OpenLetterToDonaldTrump.com and WatchTheVoteUSA.com, Donald Trump, the reality of vote fraud in the United States, and what we can do to fix our election process.
Below are relevant links for this program:
- Scourge of US elections: Electoral College, hackable voting machines & obscure rules – Cynthia McKinney
- Trump Headed for Votescam in Iowa and NH? – American Free Press (Subscribe to America’s last real newspaper today!)
- Trump: I’ll be ‘neutral’ on Israel and Palestine – The Hill
- Michael Glassner – Trump’s National Political Director
- Download
The media push on our elections lately is disturbing...........What happens if Donald Trump loses South Carolina?
Some new individual surveys show the race dramatically tightening.
https://s1.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/1...m_logo_115.jpg By Peter Grier 13 hours ago
Content preferences
Done
A few days ago we looked at the consequences of a big Donald Trump victory in South Carolina’s Republican primary on Saturday. Long story short: if he wins by more than 15 points it will become difficult to block his march to the nomination.
Related Stories
- What happens if Donald Trump wins big in South Carolina? Christian Science Monitor
- Ted Cruz uses dolls to call Donald Trump liberal. Will that work? Christian Science Monitor
- Donald Trump Takes a Hit in New WSJ Poll MarketWatch
- Republican White House hopefuls Rubio, Bush battle it out in South Carolina Reuters
- Poll: Donald Trump trounces rivals ahead of S.C. primary CBS News
- "Brightest Flashlight Ever" Selling Like Crazy ShadowHawk X800 Flashlight Sponsored Thank you for your feedback
We'll review and make changes needed.Undo
I don't like this ad
But what would happen if he loses? A few late polls hint that’s also possible. It would be a big shock, with profound effects on the 2016 race.
First, the caveat: nobody can say with assurance what Palmetto State voters are going to do. The most likely outcome remains Mr. Trump on top. The real estate billionaire has a 78 percent chance of winning South Carolina’s primary, according to the FiveThirtyEight data site primary predictor, which combines polls with endorsements and other electoral indicators.
Recommended: Can you tell the 2016 Republican presidential candidates apart? Take our quiz.
That means he also has a 22 percent chance of losing, however. That’s not inconsiderable. Hitters batting .220 occasionally get on base.
Plus, some new individual surveys show the race dramatically tightening. A just-released NBC/Wall Street Journal poll has Trump as the choice of 28
percent of South Carolina GOP voters, with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz at 23 percent and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio at 15.
An Opinion Savvy survey puts Trump at 27 percent, with Senator Rubio at 24 and Senator Cruz at 19.
Both these polls were conducted entirely following the most recent GOP debate, which was held on February 14. Trump did not do well in that showdown – one pundit tabbed him “flustered and cranky” – and the new numbers may reflect that. The NBC and Opinion Savvy pollsters may have discovered a turning tide.
If so, imagine the upshot. Trump would no longer be the clear Republican front-runner. His aura of invincibility might be threatened. It would indicate that perhaps there are things he can say or do that turn off Trumpians – such as getting in a verbal spat with the pope.
A loss might show Trump can’t expand his vote behind hard-core supporters. He’s held fairly steady at 30 percent or so of GOP voters in national polls. If he can’t grow that, he can’t get to the majority need to win the nomination (duh). If he’s stuck at 25 percent or so in South Carolina, a state whose polls he’s long led, it seems likely he’ll lose the nomination eventually. The only question could be how long that would take.
In that context his actual vote performance will be a key indicator (duh, redux). The person who emerges as his closest South Carolina rival is also important in and of itself. If it’s Cruz who wins or finishes a close second, Trump still has a chance to win it all. The outcome of a two-person Trump/Cruz final round is uncertain.
But if Rubio climbs past Cruz and nears or surpasses the Donald, that’s a sign that the establishment vote and party elites have finally coalesced around one candidate. If that happens, Rubio becomes the favorite to deliver an acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July.
Related stories
- Can you tell the 2016 Republican presidential candidates apart? Take our quiz.
- Trump vs. pope: Who is right?
- Donald Trump vs. Pope Francis: Game-changer in South Carolina? (+video)
- Trump, Sanders win in N.H. Democratic, Republican Parties lose.
Read this story at csmonitor.com
Become a part of the Monitor community
- Become a Facebook fan!
- Follow us on Twitter!
- Follow us on Google+
- Link up with us!
- Subscribe to our RSS feeds!
- Elections
- Politics & Government
- Donald Trump
- South Carolina
- Marco Rubio
Click to view comments
View Comments (171)
No one ever asks if Rubio/Cruz could win a general election against Hillary without 40 percent of the voting public. If Trump doesn't win the nomination, the 40% that support him will not vote, period!
Political Circuses: How US Elections Became a Joke
By Daily Bell Staff - February 18, 2016
- http://www.thedailybell.com/default/...es/printer.png
- http://www.thedailybell.com/default/.../font-size.png
- http://www.thedailybell.com/default/...n_feedback.png 42
Starbucks CEO warns the U.S. presidential elections are turning into a 'circus' ... CEO Howard Schultz criticized the presidential candidates for making 'bombastic attacks' without 'respect' for each other. He warned the run-up to the U.S. election had 'turned into something none of us has ever seen before... almost a circus.' – Daily Mail
The outspoken head of Starbucks believes that today's US elections are a "circus," and he has a point. In the past, certainly, the rhetoric surrounding US elections could be solemn, even sanctimonious.
Ronald Reagan regularly described America as a "shining light on a hill." Newt Gingrich ran on a very serious sounding "contract with America" that was signed Sept. 27, 1994 on the Capitol steps in Washington, D.C., by members of the Republican minority.
The "Contract with America" offered legislation that would move through the House of Representatives within the first 100 days of the 104th Congress – including tax cuts, a permanent line-item veto and measures to reduce crime and provide middle-class tax relief.
Of course, Gingrich's time in office ended badly and politicians generally have a difficult time enacting their promises.
In this Daily Mail article, however, Schultz mourns the old depictions, false as they were. He either doesn't understand or refuses to recognize that the Internet has increasingly stripped away the consequential veneer Western electioneering used to enjoy.
People understand more fully the flawed nature of their candidates. And in return, candidates themselves are becoming more strident and aggressive.
We can certainly see this in the current GOP federal election contest. It was inevitable that someone like Donald Trump would emerge to exploit the possibilities of electronic electioneering.
Trump's tendency to employ insults has turned the GOP nomination contest into a kind of mockery. The mainstream media cannot control his rhetoric as it would have in the past. His insults circulate – and resonate.
Jeb Bush is "low energy." Ted Cruz is a "liar." Former President Bill Clinton is a "woman abuser."
This is simply part of a larger process. The Internet has torn gaping holes in the credibility of leadership and how it is selected. In the US, for instance, trust in Congress is in the single digits. That's a rounding error.
The cynical perceptions of US citizens are increasingly shared by those in Europe, China, Brazil and elsewhere – in countries large and small.
Regulatory democracy in general is increasingly seen as an untrustworthy system. Too many of its major players have been discredited. Too many of its stated goals have proven to be untrue.
And the Internet has allowed voters to categorize those broken promises.
In self-defense, the age-old elites behind the system of regulatory democracy (and the "divinity of kings" before that) are moving toward the new paradigm of "technocracy," a system run by an elite of technical experts.
As such, the technocratic society is run by the best and brightest society has to offer: individuals that have gone to the best schools and accrued the most impressive bona fides.
Since the individual is increasingly becoming paramount – his professionalism and expertise – the systems themselves recede in importance.
How a system works, and whether it is necessary or even appropriate, becomes less important than how the individual technocrat applies and manages it.
From the standpoint of those elite forces that continue to control society from behind the scenes, technocracy is an apt successor to regulatory democracy. The emphasis on expertise and performance obscures the larger issue of exactly what is managed – which in turn reduces arguments over policies themselves.
The Trans Pacific Partnership trade treaty is a step toward the new technocratic society. The treaty creates a separate, international court system that places large corporations on a par with nation-states.
Technocratic management of large industrial facilities means that individuals gradually assume authority equivalent to the state itself.
As individual technocrats are elevated in this manner, their prestige increases and their importance expands. Their adeptness at managing across public and private facilities becomes an important and valuable trait.
Authoritarian solutions are increasingly the preferred method of raising funds in the 21st century. Bail-ins, taxes, IRAs and pension fund reconfigurations, severe cash-usage limitations – all of these confiscatory approaches will increasingly need justification.
As part of this process, electoral control is being removed, piecemeal, throughout the West. Three examples:
- The decision-making element of the European Union resides with the non-elected EU Commission that "proposes and implements" legislation.
- Three Greek creditors – the European Commission, The European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund – basically run Greek affairs at a macro-level. They have to sign off on Greece's compliance with previous agreements or Greece essentially becomes insolvent.
- In the US, the GOP is contemplating a brokered convention if Donald Trump seems poised to win the nomination. The compliant Marco Rubio, the favored "technocratic" candidate, has been positioned as a political prodigy.
As electoral choice is increasingly made irrelevant, the technocrat, with his ostensible expertise and supposed across-the-board competence, is swapped in to provide credibility to a variety of unjustifiable actions.
But please take note: The same Internet that has destroyed regulatory democracy allows scrutiny of the new, technocratic paradigm. Thus, the evolution of these systems will be fraught: resistance and chaos will spread.
Conclusion: Readers need to ensure their own prosperity and survival as much as possible in a time when constructs of social stability are eroding. Putting one's faith in the competence of a single, individual "leader" is both unrealistic and destructive. You are your own best counsel.
- See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/news-ana....p3jwtIgL.dpuf
Zionist Devil NeoCon Zuckerman Paints Trump as the Anti-Christ!
FEBRUARY 19, 2016 AT 10:01 AM
By Dr. David Duke
http://smoloko.com/wp-content/upload...kermanMeme.jpg
The Jewish knives are out now that Donald Trump has the Republican nomination within his sights! Both Jewish NeoCommies (progressives) and Jewish NeoConservateives (NeoTrotskyites) have united tribally to unleash a flood of excrement upon Donald Trump, whom they see as a real threat to their Jewish Establishment agenda.
The latest example of their Talmudic, Pharisaic Hatred of Trump is the Mainstream media full page attack on him by Zionist Neocon Mortimer Zuckerman with a full cover portraying Trump as a Devil and the Anti-Christ.
The Chutzpah of these destroyers knows no shame. The real anti-Christs, based in a Religion that claims in its sacred Talmud that Jewish priests are torturing Jesus Christ for eternity in boiling human Sheis, are calling Trump the Anti-Christ for wanting to build a wall to protect America!
Of course it goes way beyond that. Trump has called out and attacked the Jewish Banking Establishment as “Bloodsuckers.” He has confronted the Jewish Money Tyrants of Politics and exposed that they want to control politicians with their money while declaring that he won’t take their shekels. He has called out the needless Zio Wars in Iraq and the Mideast. He alone among the candidates is opposing their push for war with Russia. He is the only major figure pointing out that if immigration is not stopped it will destroy Europe!
Whether Trump turns out to be the enemy and the danger they perceive him as is yet to be determined. But they see him as a dire threat and now will pull out all their tricks, weapons, and totally douse him in their hateful excrement.
The Jewish Matrix of Power is of course Media, Politics and Banking. Jewish Tribalists the world over are promoting:
Support for Israel and their Zio Wars
Destruction of Russia and Putin
Annihilation of the European People through mass immigration
They perceive Donald Trump as the ultimate enemy and they realize just his positions and his political incorrectness pose a great threat by breaching these issues.
The Jewish knives are out.
The bigger the vote that Donald Trump gets the bigger the statement against the Zionist rulers of America and their Political Establishment Collaborators of the Mortal Enemy of our nation, our heritage and our people in both America and worldwide!
http://davidduke.com/zionist-devil-n...p-anti-christ/
Donald Trump's rise is a scary moment in America
We are so busy laughing at Trump that we’ve lost sight of how dangerous he is. Vox's editor-in-chief Ezra Klein explains.
http://youtu.be/drWh6vBa45k
https://youtu.be/drWh6vBa45k