new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

For those interested, Wolfgang Halbig was on with Rense last night. Much of it was just review of his 16 questions, which he's talked about in other interviews, but toward the end (maybe last 30 minutes or so), Wolfgang also talked about his plans to go to Newtown, something about looking at the books of the United Way, and comparisons between Columbine and Sandy Hook. He noted that there were tons of lawsuits after Columbine, but none after Sandy Hook. Wolfgang also observed that we never saw the parents of the victims of Columbine on CNN because they were at home grieving.

http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2014/03/...-20140317.html



Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Jeff Rense Radio Show - 2014.03.17

http://www.rense.com/1.mpicons/thinlogo2color.gif

Listen Download Hour 1 - Texe Marrs - Zionist US NWO Destabilization Program

Listen Download Hour 2 - Wolfgang Halbig - Sandy Hook Hoax

Listen Download Hour 3 - Dr. Bill Deagle MD - Fukushima Report

56k CF
Rense' site
Posted by zapoper at 10:05 AM http://img1.blogblog.com/img/icon18_email.gif




No comments:


Post a Comment

Sandy Hook Truth Investigator Wolfgang Halbig putting together a legal team, seeking funds

http://intellihub.com/sandy-hook-tru...seeking-funds/

Investigator is hoping to make a legal push that will uncover facts in the Sandy Hook case

By Staff Writer


(INTELLIHUB) —A school safety expert has raised over $10,000 in 3 days, raising funds for an independent legal team that will push to uncover what really happened at Sandy Hook. The investigator leading this effort is Wolfgang Halbig.


The purpose of this fundraising campaign is to force compliance and cooperation in finding out the facts behind the events surrounding Sandy Hook Elementary School on 12/14/2012. The funds collected here are going directly towards expenses including attorney’s fees, Freedom of Information Act Requests, as well as private investigators.

Wolfgang Halbig has lived a life of serving the public as law enforcement officer, school official, safety expert.


Formerly the Executive Director of the National Institute for School and Workplace Safety, Wolfgang Halbig has recently formed a new safety and security company, WK & Associates. Previous to founding NISWS, Mr. Halbig worked in public education as a teacher, dean, assistant principal, principal, director of an alternative school and as the Director for School Safety and Security of the Seminole County Public Schools, a school district of approximately 65,000 students.


Mr. Halbig also has law enforcement experience as a former Florida State Trooper in Miami, Florida, and as a United States Customs Inspector. As a result of his unique background in both law enforcement and education, Mr. Halbig has been invited to provide presentations and keynotes to a variety of audiences, including the National Education Law Conference, the National School Board Association, the Oklahoma School Board Association, the Illinois School Board Association, the New York State School Board Association and the Florida School Board Association.


A nationally recognized school safety and security expert and consultant, he has provided safety training and school assessments for more than 8,000 school districts nationwide.


VISIT FUNDRAISING PAGE HERE

Investigator is hoping to make a legal push that will uncover facts in the Sandy Hook case ... that would be something to see in the news paper would it not ...

March 19, 2014
Wolfgang’s Bad Company 18

Home • Tags: censorship, conspiracy research, Sandy Hook Elementary
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...a5zkFaeoTppkt2
By James F. Tracy

For two months Wolfgang Halbig has made the rounds on alternative media outlets to explain his doubts on the official narrative of the Sandy Hook massacre. Now the apparently well-intentioned school safety expert has proceeded to establish an online presence, where he has raised over $10,000 toward achieving “Sandy Hook Justice.” An appearance before the Newtown School Board is tentatively scheduled where Mr. Halbig will publicly demonstrate his indignation toward a cover-up.

In early 2013 major and alternative news media alike were beating a path to my door. Reporters quite literally chased me around my place of employment, hoping to obtain the scoop on the “wacko” academic who might recant on his observation that the incident in Newtown was likely a big fraud. Even Anderson Cooper fussed on national television that such an individual was employed at a “taxpayer-funded” institution.

Shortly after this flurry of attention certain parties contacted me and essentially proposed that they become my handlers. The idea was that I would be the public face of a detailed independent investigation into the Sandy Hook episode. For hours they attempted to convince me that the “Sandy Hook actors” were in fact members of the “Greenberg family clan.” They subsequently produced a professional-looking report that I was to tout.

I became increasingly doubtful of the thesis and how it might prove productive. My suspicion turned to alarm when the parties suggested that vigilante justice be visited upon the alleged Sandy Hook perpetrators. Even worse, a website was developed for the investigation that came dangerously close in name and terminology to mirroring a federal law enforcement agency—calling itself the “US Intelligence Information Center” and using jargon such as “suspects” and “persons of interest.” The individual then proceeded to essentially speak for me, posting the report and my name to social media sites. It was at this time that I sent the following email and discontinued further communication:

I was unaware that you posted the report on __________ and included my name and institutional affiliation. This was done without my approval, as was the posting of Sandy Hook Massacre Timeline on the website you’ve created. I am going to have to ask that things slow down and that my attorney review any further activity by you in which you use my name in any way. I also ask that you please not use my aforementioned Timeline.

As for the name of the organization, “US Intelligence Information Center” and website http://www.sandyhookinvestigation.com/ I cannot at this time approve or lend my support. The use of the title “US Intelligence Information Center” and terms such as “Suspects” and “Persons of Interest” are tantamount to impersonating law enforcement and can likely cause a great deal of trouble for all involved.

Sincerely,
James Tracy

Those in the 9/11 Truth movement are well aware of the “cognitive infiltrators” who are only too happy to harness a loose cannon or two that will sabotage or otherwise hinder the genuine remedy of collective intelligence. I am aware that at least one of the parties who misinformed me is now operating as Wofgang Halbig’s handler.

This is unfortunate because despite Halbig’s awkwardness, the overall thrust of his inquiry—legally interrogating the officials overseeing the Sandy Hook event—is a logical next step toward better understanding what took place in Newtown fifteen months ago. Yet my previous experiences indicate that such individuals will likely proceed to lead Mr. Halbig down blind or deceiving alleys that in the end will only serve to further undermine a genuine pursuit of truth.

Well, I hope Professor Tracy's article above is able to serve as a wake-up call to Wolfgang, and that he's able to get away from whoever attempting to serve as his "handler" behind the scenes. And this actually explains a lot--I actually remember when Professor Tracy presented that initial report last March about the "Greenberg family" and I was highly doubtful of that information. It's good he was able to wake up to their misdirection and cut ties. I'm just hoping that Wolfgang will do the same.

me too. I have had nagging concerns about this approaching confrontation that appears to be being setup. It could end up with someone being dragged out in a white jacket and that would be damaging.

Kenneth Feinberg - "Pay Czar" for 9/11, Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, BP Oil Spill A Devout Zionist

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJAvobSjSf8

It's amazing that a man in charge of paying Americans compensation for disasters doesn't think "life should be fair".. and has clearly stated that he is worried about Jewish people becoming American and losing their loyalty to Israel and instead being loyal to America instead. This Zionist was in charge of payouts for the 9/11 Attacks (which the State of Israel was implicated in), Sandy Hook, Aurora, Boston, Agent Orange, the Holocaust, The B.P. Oil Spill, the Banker Bailout Scandal and the Zaprudar film, amongst other litigation.

He got payment to the corrupt CEOs during the Bailout Scandal very quickly.. but many people with plenty of paperwork starving to death from The Gulf Spill couldn't get compensated to save their lives.

Isn't it at all strange to anyone else that one man is in charge of all these tragedies?

He's not even done with BP litigation, yet he continues to take on more claimants in new "tragedies" such as Sandy Hook.

What's even more worrying is he clearly states he doesn't want Jewish people to assimilate into America. Isn't America a melting pot? Why is it all other cultures are supposed to mix together and be loyal to America, but it is "worrisome" that Jewish people do the same and should be ultimately loyal to America, not Israel?

How can this man be in charge of disbursements for every single American disaster and tragedy, when he doesn't believe life "should be fair" and is a racist who doesn't believe in the mixing of cultures- who doesn't believe Jewish people should be American?

^ more on feinberg:
Thread: BP doesn't pay fisherman/clean-up worker claims; pays stripper $80K

Here's another Wolfgang Halbig interview. You probably want to skip ahead a bit b/c the beginning goes over his background, which everyone has heard before. Toward the end, maybe the 1 hr mark, Wolfgang talks about his plan for going to Newtown and presenting the School Board with various FOIA requests. It's here where you can really see how his background as as a school administrator is extremely helpful b/c he knows about all the various reports, inspections, and other documents that are supposed to be prepared on an annual basis and available to the public. He's going to request reports going back to 2002, including even food services contracts, b/c he's fairly convinced that the school was not even operational. Wolfgang also mentioned that he's hired two attorneys and private investigators.

Carivan To Midnight with Wolfgang W Halbig. The Sandy Hook Hoax

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3q0-BWSLYPo

Here's a video from "Samantha Caine" (I'm fairly certain she's an attorney-I've seen her comment over at Prof Tracy's blog). This is about how CT attorney, Sedensky, is refusing to release public records based on the claim that there is an on-going child abuse investigation (I think he's trying to claim that those children who we never saw evacuated from that non-operational school are possible child abuse victims).

Sandy Hook Elementary School - State Claims Child Abuse Investigation Is Ongoing

Published on Jan 29, 2014

Freedom of Information Act hearing June 3, 2013. Associated Press/Gillum vs. Town of Newtown. Listen as Steven Sedensky, attorney for Danbury District, State of CT admits to the Hearing Commissioner that there is an on going criminal investigation regarding child abuse relating to the incident at Sandy Hook Elementary School December 12, 2012.



Samantha Caine

1 month ago

Sedensky claims there was an on going child abuse investigation relating to SH School, then if that's true, the school should not have been demolished, that is tampering with a crime scene. They didn't know their "tight" scenario is now springing leaks everywhere.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsNL93NaGnQ

Sandy Hook Hoax - Con. Freedom of Information Act CHANGED FOREVER to Protect the Lie

I knew we would NEVER be seeing any photos of any blood, bodies, anything from inside the school, or the Lanza home because this is a massive scam, what I did not know was the huge lengths that would go to indefinitely change US law in order to perpetuate this SCAM on the American people-

Now, not only does this affect the Sandy Hook Hoax, it also is a future precedent for any future Hoax/False Flag the government wants to pull on the American people- No Freedom of Information for the slaves of America.. more false flags in the works- and now they don't even have to fake anything, they can just say it happened, hire a bunch of actors, and they're golden- they can change any US law using emotional scare tactics, and the American people just have to take their word for it!

Sandy Hook Hoax - Freedom Of Information Act Changed forever to protect the Lie.

No more freedom of information, need to protect these actors/musicians and their scam, and now, in the future these hoaxes are even easier!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R8QV1EoEvM

For those who don't have the time to go through this whole article http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/10...oax/#more-7928, here's a video that gives a good summary (the fact that Sandy Hook was a non-operational school should be the 11th reason this was a HOAX)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwH6LYa2XKU

Here's the latest from a SH youtuber, who is offering his full support to Wolfgang and is getting sick of the attacks on him from other SH youtubers (his video summary is kind of funny: "Im glad hes been vetted, but now people are just being bitches."--LOL!!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjiaswvXCw0#t=225

Now here's the latest from James Tracy--it seems like he has concerns about taking this in a legal direction. But if we don't do that, then what are we supposed to do? Just spend another year posting more videos on what an obvious hoax it is??? IMO it seems like it's time to move this from the internet to the real world and at least attempt some sort of legal action. And on the issue of legal standing, I honestly have no idea b/c I'm not a lawyer, but this has already been used to as grounds for restricting gun rights in some states (and this is just the beginning). It seems like it would be most helpful for the people of CT to wake up to this b/c they obviously have standing, as do the people who donated to those hoaxers. The comments over at Tracy's are worth a read.

Is Legal Action An Option for Sandy Hook? ¹⁷

Home • Tags: conspiracy research, Sandy Hook Elementary

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...uonN9FCWTdg498By James F. Tracy

The course of action Wolfgang W. Halbig proposes to address unanswered questions concerning the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, and a foremost reason for the funding drive he is spearheading, involves civil litigation to compel testimony from pertinent officials and parties.

Parties close to memoryholeblog.com have recently consulted a proficient attorney to discuss the effectiveness of filing suit in situations involving potential state crime, such as Sandy Hook.

An operative term the plaintiff must concern him/herself with is LEGAL STANDING – whether one is a proper plaintiff. In other words, are you the real party in interest? What are your damages?

Many lawsuits are thrown out of court simply because the plaintiff has no such standing. In other words, if the plaintiff cannot prove s/he has been harmed and cannot assert what damages they have sustained, s/he is not a plaintiff in good standing. The courts do not render collective relief – they render relief based on how one is found to have been harmed. Mr. Halbig and/or other out-of-state parties will not be able to prove how they have personally been harmed by the Sandy Hook event. Such individuals are considered “outsiders.” Mr. Halbig cannot bring a claim for something that has not harmed him personally and directly.

Wolfgang Halbig’s grounds for a lawsuit might well be good, however. GROUNDS have to do with the nature of your claim. Even if Mr. Halbig can prove every single thing in his Complaint (the initial legal filing), Wolfgang Halbig himself has not been harmed. In short, Wolfgang Halbig cannot bring the claim for damages or harm caused by the Sandy Hook event. Only someone “closer” could do that – e.g., the parents or relatives of the alleged victims. When Wolfgang Halbig or other parties file a lawsuit, the court will ask the question: Does he have any standing to assert those grounds?

The most likely result of such a lawsuit would be a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. This is quick and easy, and will eliminate the need for any discovery and depositions. The idea that Wolfgang posed in one of his early interviews – to “get some of these people and depose them” – is not even possible given his compromised position.

On the other hand, a class action lawsuit is even a more complex and large-scale project. Even $100,000 (Wolfgang Halbig’s present donation goal) would not come close to paying for a class action suit (if he were to allege harm in the way of terror/fear/anxiety caused to the American people from a fictitious event that never took place, for instance). Class action lawsuits are extremely expensive.

Wolfgang Halbig’s desire to get to the bottom of the event transpiring in Newtown on December 14, 2012 are shared by many throughout the US and world. At the same time, however, parties interested in donating to Sandy Hook Justice should be aware of the very real circumstances that prohibit straightforwardly resolving this important matter in a court of law.

Here's the latest from Professor Tracy's site. The article is originally posted here: http://www.insanemedia.net/ I haven't heard of that insanemedia site before, but it looks like it's worth a visit, as it has a lot of info on Sandy Hook. And supposedly there are other parts this "Follow the Money" series, so if I find them I'll bring them over.

Also, be sure to check out the info at the bottom of the article--that population total certainly doesn't fit the population total that the MSM has been saying for Newtown (I think they have been reporting 28,000). Also, fyi, "John Luv," a person over at Prof. Tracy's site (original comment here http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/02/24...o-feb-21-2014/), posted the comment below, which also suggests that the population is much lower than reported. I've actually heard people talk about the idea of a "CIA" town or something like that, with the idea being that they control the whole fake place and can pull off stuff like this.

John Luv says:
March 6, 2014 at 4:50 pm

Paulstal, I agree with you 100%, they are the same. Victoria Munoz is another CIA agent that has appeared at countless Drills to date also.

We will not be able to do much with the Sandy Hook Bunch, unless we get the masses on board. Why? Very simple. I passed through Newtown, CT last week on my way back from a business trip to MA. Newtown, CT is a make believe place, just like SHES was. I have challenged many on this blog here to prove to me that the population of Newtown is 28,000 as reported by wiki. I know that the population is way under 500, because I was hard pressed to find 50 people during my drive through the entire town. Newtown is the town that isn’t there, a virtual ghost town, a potemkin village and nothing more.




Sandy Hook Charity Industry: Follow the Money ¹

Guest Posts • Tags: Sandy Hook Elementary, state crime


https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...1btnc1M-t5VnP8

By Pilot

Tragic publicized events provide the basis for major fundraising efforts with the purported rationale of assisting those immediately impacted. In the case of the Sandy Hook School massacre charities have sprung up to take in tens of millions for wide array of “healing” and preventative initiatives.

This article originally appeared at Insanemedia on March 23, 2014 (link here), and is republished with permission. This is the fourth installment in a series examining the reported donations and government revenue taken in by Newtown/Sandy Hook charities and related entities in the wake of the December 14, 2012 event.-JFT

Now that the dust has settled a bit, it’s time to take another look at the donation totals for Sandy Hook. There are several articles that have been published over the past 15 months with varying degrees of relevance. Some of them gleaned information from CT Attorney General George Jepson’s survey, but at the time of publication, not all respondents had filed their reports. This includes my previous article, Follow the Money Part 3. At the time of that writing, it was impossible to arrive at an accurate total of the charities’ collections.

Since that time, there have been Federal grants made to Newtown, and one very large grant from the state of Connecticut, but we’ll get to that shortly. I would first like to cover the CT Attorney General survey, although out of date at this point, it seems a good place to begin.

By clicking through each report, the totals of money raised by spring of last year can be found. Of the 62 unique charities reporting, the whole dollar sum of all donations amounts to

$22, 277, 070.00

Twenty-two million, two-hundred seventy-seven thousand, seventy dollars.

As I mentioned, this total is inaccurate. It is less than what has actually been raised. How much less we can estimate based on later reporting.

In an article dated 12/14/13, NBC news stated that Sandy Hook Promise had raised 2.3 million dollars. That is $2,262,000.00 more that the $1,238,000.00 they reported in June of 2013 to the CT Attorney General. Let’s add that to our total: $22,277,070 + 2,262,000 =

$24,539, 070.00

Also mentioned in the NBC article was the Sandy Hook-Newtown Community Foundation as having raised “over 12 million”. That is one million+ more than reported originally. Let’s add again:

$25,539,070.00

Newtown Youth and Family Services originally reported 1 million raised, but by the end of the year they claimed 1.2 million.

$25, 739, 070.00

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...GXYCjYWWnwg01w

The NBC reporter included a few smaller charities that I did not find listed on the Jepson and Friends survey. I am attempting to get at the most accurate, conservative total. The 27 million claimed by NBC may well be close to the truth.

What the article in question did not cover were the Federal and State grants awarded to Newtown in the interim. Let’s take a look at those, shall we?

From the Department of Justice, Newtown received 2.5 million dollars, for officer overtime and what-not.

“Grants will be awarded to the Connecticut State Police ($663,444), Town of Newtown ($602,293), Town of Monroe ($882,812), and other partner agencies ($296,836), which include 34 surrounding Connecticut jurisdictions.”

28,239,070.00

The Department of Education provided two School Emergency Response to Violence, or SERV grants of 1.3 million in May of 2013, and 1.9 million in January of this year.

“We will do whatever we can to continue assisting and supporting the healing and recovery of Newtown,” U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said. “This additional grant will help students, teachers, families, school district and community move forward after such an unimaginable tragedy.”

$31,439,070.00

The State of Connecticut pledged to award Newtown an additional 50 million dollars to demolish Sandy Hook School, and build a new and improved one on the very same site.

Newtown will not have to pay a penny for a new Sandy Hook Elementary School — state officials are making sure of that.

In the waning hours of the General Assembly session this week, legislators voted to approve as much as $50 million for a new school in Newtown.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, at a Capitol news conference Thursday afternoon, said he had made it clear to Newtown First Selectman Pat Llodra within days after the Dec. 14 shootings at the school that it would be up to the town to decide the future of the building. (CTpost.com June 6, 2013)


Let’s add again:

$81,439,070.00

That about does it for Government funding.

Let’s now add in the very generous donation made by General Electric of 15 million dollars.

“More than 150 employees of Fairfield-based GE live in Newtown. GE CEO Jeff Immelt said that over the last year, GE employees who live in Newtown also identified a community center as among the town’s greatest needs.

The town said it will use $10 million to build the center and $5 million for operating costs, including hiring staff, over five years. The center will be owned and operated by the town.”

$96, 439, 070.00

That’s Ninety-six million, four-hundred thirty-nine thousand, seventy dollars.

No conflict of interest there. I report, you draw outrageous conclusions.


https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...okBL4FWwntou-Q


There are dozens more charities to look into. The smaller, child/victim associated funds that serve as scholarships in the child’s name for example. The Catherine Hubbard fund raised 250k for an animal sanctuary. This was included in the Attorney General report. The Fairfield County Community Foundation collects for Mary Sherlach and Grace McDonnell. The 62,000 raised by the Ct Yankee council Boy Scout Pack 170 was divvied up between the Hockley, Hubbard, Kowalski, Previdi and Wheeler families, all of which have their own fund raising vehicles. You may recognize the difficulty in figuring out what went where and when.

Since all 501(c)3 organizations must file a 990 or 990EZ with the IRS, we might reasonably expect to have access to these filings when they are available.

I was able to locate a few funds that openly displayed the total raised on the donation page: Ben’s Lighthouse: $40,646, and Race 4 Chase (Kowalski)$ 67,807. Since they both received the gift from the Boy Scouts, do these totals include the 12,400 that would have been their share? Only the shadow knows.

I will continue to gather the information on these smaller funds and provide you with my findings. I had been feeling a little guilty for not following up with another article for so long, but as it happens, the information available now is more accurate than what it would have been six months ago. My guilt is assuaged. Thank you for your continued interest in “Follow the Money”.

Just as an aside, a few researchers have made arguments regarding the actual population of Newtown being under 2,000 people. This seems plausible to me only because we have heard so very little from this community of “28,000″ . I have seen reports from people driving through the area, and they describe it as being very deserted. While this anecdotal evidence may not be proof of anything, consider the city-data report from 2012 which states that the population of Newtown is:

1,973

938 males, 1035 females.

http://www.city-data.com/city//Newtown-Connecticut.html


For what it’s worth.

Pilot

I found this linked to over at Prof. Tracy's site. This guy, Dan M. Hennen, has been supportive of Wolfgang and is concerned about all of the attacks on him. He's outlined below a number of the key characters who have been on the attack.

Now on this "Scott Creighton" from the willyloman site that he mentions, I've heard that that site is suspect (I'm fairly certain that all along they were not going along with the official story on SH, but they were not going along with the hoax idea--I think they may have been suggesting that it as an American Gladio type of event). Anyway, they carried two articles on Wolfgang, and throughout the comments on the first one was a character called "Poseidon," who seemed to be tag-teaming a bit with this Willyloman (aka Scott Crieghton). And this Poseidon character repeatedly linked to the takebackourworld site, which attacks those of us who see hoaxes and media fakery around Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombing. Also, if I'm not mistaken, this Poseidoen character has been working with or passing info along to Spingola.


http://www.writingroom.com/viewwriting/dmhennen/Sandy-Hook--Halbigs-Hyenas

Sandy Hook: Halbig's Hyenas

Dan M. Hennen - 3/23/14

When Wolfgang Halbig arrived on the scene after doing an interview with American Free Press, he quickly drew attention, and a fan-base, and followed it up with several other National interviews. He kept his focus on three things....a list of 16 questions he wanted answered by state law enforcement officials, he wanted to create greater awareness of the story, and he wanted to go to Newtown, CT and ask direct questions to people directly involved and eliminate the hearsay.

When Wolfgang's name came up in blogs, Facebook posts, "tweets" on Twitter, and on the "comments" sections of online articles, an interesting trend was noticed....the people commenting seemed to fall into three distinct categories:

1) fans who praised his work and encouraged his efforts

2) skeptics who wanted him vetted for authenticity, and

3) those who hated him and wanted to de-rail his attempt to get to the truth.


Much of the response, was easily that 95% of the people fell into the camps of item 1 and item 2 above....but a recurring cast of characters, fell into group 3, and they led a charge of relentless ridicule and hatred towards Mr. Halbig that I found odd. In most cases, there is always and group 1 and group 2, but only in the case of an upcoming political election, one would find the amount of mud-slinging that came about in the first two weeks of Mr. Halbig's popularity. The background history and personal past of this man went fully under the microscope. I followed the trend and kept notes and what I found was quite disturbing. A handful of people were making the same types of comments on multiple pages and sites....and not comments "here and there", but true spamming of the same agenda put forth by the same handful of names. The work done by this group was embarrassing, childish and not done in good faith, but instead an attempt to "overthrow" and man in a "coup d'état" type of way. I will call them the Hyenas.

These hyenas end up being a group of individuals who have put in many hours of research into Sandy Hook and have dedicated months of getting the truth out in the Government Staged Event on 12/14/12. This group didn't embrace Mr. Halbig with open arms and encourage the ballsy initiative that he had while the others sat back and made you tube clips with their findings. They put forth a uniform effort to"run him out of town", because how "dare" Mr. Halbig come onto the scene without asking the leaders first if it was okay. These people felt a sense of "betrayal" of this man.

Below is a list of the culprits followed by direct quotes:

Erik Pearson, co-admin at the "Sandy Hook Hoax" Facebook group and co-admin of the"Halbig-Exposed" Facebook group.

"I honestly think that he was placed there and was to be used as a distraction as soon as we were getting close." (Source: Facebook post)

"I am 100% questioning Mr.Halbig’s validity. To make his grand debut and then 2 weeks later start asking for funds is obscene. He is a former LEO. He knows the procedure to file and receive a FOIA request. He has yet to submit one correctly. He is a former school principal yet he cannot form a sentence or grasp grammar and spelling as well as my first grader." (Source: Facebook post)

"As you know, I have been waiting for close to 3 weeks for Wolfgang Halbig to accept my friend request" (Source: Facebook post)

“It is my honest opinion that WH is nothing more than a man trying to grasp his last 15 minutes of fame and perhaps get a nice payday "book deal" out of it. This would be great for him to write his memoirs huh? Even if he is shot down in court. What a great story. (Source: Facebook post)

"We have been investigating this case and have uncovered mountains of evidence. We have done a tremendous amount of footwork. WH comes out and all of a sudden all of the Baby Boomers are demanding justice.... I am willing to bet that 99% of the people that donated can name more than 3 key players in this event. That is a fact. He is garnering attention from the people. He should have stayed quiet and done things the right way.” (Source: Facebook post)

"And Mr. Halbig and his handlers are succeeding in their operation to separate the truthers. In today's post he is attacking Fetzer and Smallstorm. He has single handedly divided the real investigators and has pit them up against each other. Way to go Wolfie. Where do I send my check?" (Source: Facebook post)

Comment: Mr. Pearson is quite upset that Mr. Halbig didn't seek his support, and will throw him under the bus because of it.


Tony Mead, co-admin at "Sandy Hook Hoax" Facebook group and co-admin at "Halbig-Exposed" Facebook group

"My efforts to speak directly to Mr Halbig were referred to Thomas Lapp who apparently is the Admin of his Facebook and Donation pages. When I insisted that I speak directly with Mr Halbig, I was accused of being a ‘troll’ and told to just ‘submit a list of questions’. I think that the fact that he has not shown up on this page to address these accusations directly is quite telling.” (Source: MemoryHoleBlog comment)

Goes after Halbig on a lengthy Facebook comments section under the alias "Benjamin Dover"

"At this point, I would assume that whatever good intentions ‘he’ had have been hijacked by people with an ulterior motive."

"I'm nobody, I'm just a regular guy." - Phone interview with Halbig (this coming from a man demanding answers and insisting Halbig talk to him)

"Climb aboard the Wolfgang Titanic." – (Source: comment on Brendan Hunt’s facebook page.)


Comment: The tone used here sounds like someone is angry that Mr. Halbig didn’t “go to the right people” when he came onto the scene. How is it that Mr. Mead needs to "demand" and "insist" such things. Who is he, and why does he need to come off as a "tough guy?"


Rob Craig – alias "the conspiracy critic"

“A word of advice to Halbig and his “guys”…Instead of pissing off and ignoring the real researchers who have been on this since day one, you should have created a bond…gathered together the greatest think tank and aligned yourself with the real truth seekers…There is strength in numbers, and if you continue to “Lone Wolf” it, you will see the error of your ways…”

Comment: wow


Brendan Hunt – alias xrayultra

"....rather than focusing on wolfgang's somewhat lame"sixteen questions" (a few of which have been answered already).” (Source: Facebook post)

"i think its becoming clear who and what halbig is"(Source: Facebook post)

“I was interested in your early work on the subject, but now you're coming across as someone who feels like he has some kind of proprietary claim on the subject matter.” (Source: Facebook comment directed at Mr. Hunt)

Comment: His posts repeatedly say “we’ve already answered the 16 questions”….but Mr. Hunt needs to keep in mind that Mr. Halbig wants the Law Enforcement Officials in Connecticut to answer them.


Peacebewithyoursoul - comments taken from MemoryHoleBlog

“He is ultimately going to do major damage to our cause. If he actually goes to Sandy Hook and gets arrested, it will be curtains for Truthers. He would not last three seconds in an interview with an Anderson Cooper or any mainstream media pundit/talking head/empty suit.”

“He is a bumpkin, and a dangerous prospect for the future of The Truth regarding Sandy Hook.”

"Why did he wait until 14 months later to appear? Why did he allegedly get visited by police twice (or was it thrice?), when none of us other Sandy Hook researchers who have been doing deep investigatory work since 12/14/2012, have never been visited by Law Enforcement, never mind even called by L.E.? I live in Connecticut, and I have been making a large scene with writing letters to the editors of various papers large and small, getting published, and I have called into more than a dozen AM talk shows, and I am a regular on two, still to this day, and I always spoke the unspeakable regarding Sandy Hook. No cop ever visited me…..He wouldn’t last a minute in a televised debate with the likes of Piers Morgan, Anderson Cooper, or any of the tv personalities. Heck,he wouldn’t last ten seconds against Brendan Hunt, or me, or some of the others who have been to Sandy Hook, and have been researching this since 12/14/2012."

Comment: Mr. Halbig was on this case early on, in fact he contacted Dr James Tracy in March of 2013 when his requests were met with stonewalling.


Scott Creighton – alias willyloman

"Rainmaker Wolfgang Halbig – A Pure Fraud in the Classic Sense" article

"Along comes Mr. tasteless Halbig and he posts this comment on the article back in July of 2012.He was asking for a $100,000 back then as well. What a coincidence right? It cost a hundred grand for him to protect those bullied kids and it costs a hundred grand for him to get answers to his 16 stupid questions."

"Turns out Mr.Halbig has now set up a website in which he implores you to “invest in seeking the Sandy Hook truth”. He claims that he is raising money in order to force authorities to answer his list of 16 poorly crafted questions which do little to nothing to get at the heart of the Sandy Hook mass casualty event.

Comment: Creighton focuses on the donations in this hit-piece on Mr. Halbig, but then states the 16 questions have "little or nothing" to do with the event?



Beth D. – comments taken from MemoryHoleBlog

"Who in the blazes does he think he is? He’s making every reasonable and logical SHook skeptic look like a conspiracy nut."

"Yes,I have made FOIA requests. Yes, I have been threatened by gov officials – even with arrest for digging into things that they didn’t like. Ideal with government in my work daily."

"Oh pahleeze…I think the references come from the fact that the fellow is supposedly educated, was a teacher, a police officer and a business consultant and yet does not appear to be able to assemble written communications in a proper and effective manner."

Comment: Too much of the “holier than thou” language.



Nick202 – comments taken from MemoryHoleBlog

"Most importantly, with his alleged credentials, the dummy should know that the reason he hasn’t received responses to his FIOA requests is that he hasn’t follow the FIOA procedures and therefore hasn’t officially filed a single FOIA request because you cannot file an FOIA request by email.”

"You can NOT file an FOIA request through Wolfgang Halbig’s method of sending gibberish to various individuals, someone with his credentials should understand the importance of always being professional. It is quite simple to find a sample FOIA request letter for the State of Connecticut."

Comment: This person thinks that the email correspondence from Mr. Halbig from November/December 2013, were, in fact, the official FOIA requests sent to the State of Connecticut by Mr. Halbig in early 2013.


Team Wake ‘Em Up

Created the YouTube video called “Why I’m not donating to Wolfgang."

Hit-piece focusing entirely on Involuntary Dissolution of Wolf’s past businesses.

Comment: This entire video was put together by someone without a business background or understanding of how businesses are setup and how they dissolve.



Summary:

Remember, these are THEIR words, not mine. Notice the tone used in these quotes and tell me if they are written in good faith by people who want to "vet" Mr. Halbig or written simply in a mean-spirited way, like as a new-kid in school who is quickly "pushed aside" by the popular kids after the new kid gets too much attention.

Just found this perfect comment over at Prof Tracy's in response to the post on the "Sandy Hook Charity Industry" (^1255):

Jeff C says:

March 24, 2014 at 3:37 pm

Ninety-six million, four-hundred thirty-nine thousand, seventy dollars?!?!?!!
No wonder these people are so happy!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOes-tukVyM

Here's the latest from Fetzer: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03...ut-sandy-hook/ (some of the youtube vids in the article have already been posted here, so I won't actually post them on the page, but will just include a link)

Wolfgang Halbig heads to Newtown for the truth about Sandy Hook

by Jim Fetzer

http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont...es-320x195.jpg

Wolfgang Halbig, who is a former Florida State Trooper, school principal and national school safety expert, heads for Newtown, CT, in pursuit of the truth about Sandy Hook.

After submitting one FOIA request after another, which the authorities have entirely ignored, he is putting his boots on the ground and going after those records in person himself.

Wolf will be attending the Newtown School Board meeting scheduled for 7:30 PM/ET on Tuesday, 6 May 2014, to ask the members of the school board sixteen simple questions to which he has been unable to obtain answers.

Wolf came to the country’s attention through a stunning interview with Dave Gahary of American Free Press, which, I would estimate, has had hundreds of thousands of listeners across the US and the world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6roDPt1WYYY

Indeed, I have asked Dave Gahary whether, if Wolf were to visit Newtown, AFP would send him to cover it, to which he has informed me the answer is, “Yes!” And I am quite sure other reporters and papers will want to cover his visit as well.

Jeff Rense and Alex Jones

In the meanwhile, the has been featured by prominent figures such as Jeff Rense and Alex Jones, among many other radio hosts, who have appreciated the importance of what he is attempting to do: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZKyDV8Fnu4

The reason, of course, is obvious: Wolf has the background and qualifications as an expert on school safety to be in the position to resolve a perplexing national quagmire, where local, state and even federal authorities are suppressing information.

No one who defends the official story acknowledges that the school itself was a toxic waste dump, which does not appear to have been in use for years before Sandy Hook: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYwYUya3zCs

One of the reasons for confronting the School Board, therefore, is that its members cannot not know that the school was virtually abandoned and awaiting demolition.

Wolf’s 16 Questions

From all of the attempts to discredit Wolf, one might infer that he is some kind of radical out to stir up concerns where none are warranted. But the issues that he has raised appear to be very simple and straightforward, which are raised by published accounts, press reports and the video record. Here are sixteen:

1. Who on 14 December 2012 was the Incident Commander as required by the Federal Emergency Management Administration in directing the Mass Casualty Shooting Incident at the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

2. Who and Why did they not request the Life Star Helicopters knowing that children and school staff are seriously injured and clinging to life?

3. Who and Why did they not allow the Paramedics and the EMTs inside the Sandy Hook School to treat any seriously injured children and school staff clinging to life?

4. Who declared all eighteen children and six school staff members legally dead within the first eight minutes? [NOTE: Two were claimed to have been transported to a local hospital before they died. The purported shooter, Adam Lanza, and his mother, Nancy Lanza, are not included in this count.]

5. Who was the Certified Environmental Bio-Hazard Decontamination company contracted by the Newtown Public Schools to remove gallons of blood, skull fragments, brain tissues, bodily fluids, blood soaked carpets and decontaminate areas inside the Sandy Hook School?

6. Why does an off duty Lieutenant from the Newtown Police Department refuse to leave his off duty work assignment at a construction site on 14 December 2012 after hearing that shots have been fired at the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

7. Who at the Newtown Public Schools notified all of the parents in writing (as required by CT law) that had children attending the Sandy Hook Elementary School as well as every school staff member every school year of all the potential life threatening chemical hazards? [NOTE: The school had high levels of lead paint throughout the entire school, Asbestos in the ceiling tiles and floor tiles, asbestos in the insulation and, most of all, the school had a very high levels of PCB. Check out what PCB is and it should scare any parent.]

8. Who provided the urgent medical care for the two children who were not transported to the Danbury Trauma Center until an hour after the school was deemed safe for that 15-mile drive?

9. Who treated those two children who had been shot multiple times–as many as 3 to 11 times–since they did not allow the paramedics and EMTs inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School?

10. Why did the parents of the two children who died at the Danbury Trauma Center not allow their children to donate their organs to other children waiting for the gift of life?

11. What happened to the 500 children and 60 school staff members from Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012?

12. Who was the police officer calling into the Newtown Police dispatcher stating in his words that he has multiple weapons, he has a rifle and a shotgun and who has the rifle and the shotgun as the chain of evidence should show that was found in Classroom 8?

13. Why would a police officer by the name of Lt Vangehle at 9:45:21 am on 14 December 2012 from the Newtown Police Department after finding a kindergarten female child in the hallway make her go into Classroom 8 and leave her? That was a gruesome crime scene with dead children and school staff. Who would do that?

14. Why would two CT State Troopers enter Classroom 10 at 9:55:31 am on 14 December 2012–which was a gruesome crime scene with dead bodies of children and school staff–and tell a kindergarten boy who they find in the bathroom whose name is redacted and tell them so it must be more than one to stay and they will be both back when it is safe?

15. Who ordered the porta-potties that showed up at the scene of the crime about three hours after the event?

16. Who ordered the twenty-six Christmas trees that were stored behind the Firehouse on 14 December 2012 and then brought out to be decorated to commemorate the twenty-six reported victims?

This last question is remarkable by itself because, had the Firehouse been conducting a Christmas tree sale, it would have been normal to have had dozens and dozens of trees, not just the right number to equal the number of victims:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_prkGCQmis

It is not just the improbability of having 26 trees for 26 victims, but that those trees were there before the shooting had taken place. Notice, too, that none of these questions is sensitive. So why won’t the authorities answer them?

What’s going on?

Remarkably, Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States, visited Governor Malloy of Connecticut just a few weeks before the Sandy Hook event. Holder is a gun-control zealot, it appears, and wants to “brainwash” the public to adopt a new anti-gun attitude, even though it violates the 2nd amendment of the Constitution he has sworn to uphold. That is far from the most intriguing aspect of this documentary, which sheds a great deal of light on the rationale for Sandy Hook:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E1txpSra6U

Notice, for example, that Governor Malloy tells reporters he and the Lt. Governor had been “spoken to” about an event like this taking place–no doubt, by the Attorney General. But what kind of event could that have been? If it were an actual mass shooting, then surely he ought to have taken steps to insure it did not happen, which he did not do. So it would appear that he had been informed that a drill would take place that would be presented as though it were real.The

Enduring Cover-Up

During several debates about Sandy Hook, the first with Keith Johnson, the second with Michael Collins Piper–I emphasized the “Top Ten Reasons” that this appears to have been an elaborate hoax, including:

(1) that proof of death has been suppressed, (2) that emergency protocols were not followed, (3) that drill protocols were followed, (4) that there was foreknowledge of the event, (5) that there was confusion over what weapons were used, (6) that the suspect cannot possibly have carried out the shooting as claimed, (7) that strange behavior was displayed by officials, witnesses and relatives, (8) that there are many odd photos of participants, (9) that the crime scene was destroyed under conditions of secrecy, and (10) that some of the children even appear to have been featured as singers at the Super Bowl.

Here are four crucial cases, which, each on its own, ought to raise serious doubt that children were actually killed at Sandy Hook and support the inference that this was a drill. Taken together, they leave scant room for doubt about the truth of the matter, which Wolfgang Halbig will undoubtedly confirm during his visit to Newtown. What would it mean, after all, if none of his questions are answered and his access to information is curtailed? If Sandy Hook happened as claimed, then ongoing research will confirm it; and if it did not, the world–especially the American public–deserves to know.

Case One: The NYC Gold Shield Detective

http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont...n-320x2511.jpg

As I had explained in my opening statement during the first debate, there are multiple visual indications that we are dealing with a drill, including a portable sign, “EVERYONE MUST CHECK IN”, which is the featured image in the “Top Ten Reasons” article; that almost everyone, including firemen, were wearing name tags on lanyards; and that virtually no one was in business dress or office clothing as though they had rushed to the scene from work. On the contrary, they are almost all in casual or informal clothing, which would be appropriate for a drill. And many of them are walking in circles, out one door of the Firehouse a 1/2 mile from the school and back in another, again and again, which Sofia Smallstorm captured in her brilliant video study, “Unraveling Sandy Hook”, which makes no sense if it had been a real event, but does if it was instead a drill.

Because Keith Johnson had contended that registration signs and name tags on lanyards were “standard police procedures” at crime scenes, I contacted Jim Rothstein, a Gold Shield Detective from New York City, whom I know from JFK research, and asked him if that was indeed a common practice or if he had ever heard of it being done. His response was plain and simple: “No.” We discussed it a bit more and it became obvious to me that he thought that was a ridiculous claim to make. So I was sure to include it during the later stages of our debate, which Piper simply ignored.

Case Two: The AFT Special Assistant

During the third round of the first debate, I also observed that, although the “official narrative” would have you believe that Adam Lanza was a firearms fanatic, ATF Special Assistant Agent Gene Marquez said that his agency “has not been able to uncover any evidence that the mother and the son were actively engaged in going to the gun ranges, practicing marksmanship, or anything of that nature.”

During the second hour of her interview with Mike Power, Joyce Riley mentions a Wall Street Journal article that stated they couldn’t find any evidence of Nancy or Adam Lanza going to any of the shooting ranges in that local area. In a video, “No Gun Permit Under Nancy Lanza’s Name in public records, says TIME Magazine”, at 57 sec mark, there is a screen shot from TIME, saying that in a public records search, they could find no firearms or weapons permits under Nancy’s name: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2CJVaYHqBw

Video description: Published on Jan 11, 2013- So gun permit records are public knowledge, and major news outlets are unable to find any for Nancy Lanza. Not even for the AR-15 rifle? The police are saying that those guns were registered to her and she had permits for them, but apparently the public records themselves are not supporting their theories.

Case Three: The FBI’s former Top Shrink

The behavior of several of the key participants in the Sandy Hook event, including especially Gene Rosen, struck me and a number of others as highly inappropriate. Gene Rosen is one of the most prolific of the Sandy Hook media stars but has given animated and conflicting statements to a series of reporters (in English and Spanish). Considered a “good Samaritan” by the mainstream media, he reportedly harbored six children from the school.

I was so struck by the crucial role of Gene Rosen that I asked a friend of mine, Alen Salerian, M.D., who had originally contacted me about JFK research, for his evaluation of Gene Rosen’s testimony as presented in the video interview we included in “Top Ten Reasons”. As the former head of the FBI Rapid Response Psychiatric Unit, I thought his opinions would clarify and illuminate what we have here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgq6SVbIbAI

He wrote back on the basis of his review of the Gene Rosen interview, which we had included in “Top Ten Reasons”:

Gene Rosen was a key witness who corroborated the official story of the Sandy Hook elementary school killings. Rosen reported that, six children after witnessing the murder of their teacher Vicky Soto sought refuge at his home.

Mr. Rosen had already heard gunfire from an automatic weapon.

According to Mr. Rosen, the kids seemed nervous while they drank orange juice and played with stuffed animals. He never called 911. It took 15 minutes or more for the kids to begin talking about the horrific events including the death of their teacher.

Obvious inconsistencies of Gene Rosen’s statement:

A. For six kids for 15 minutes not to say anything about their frightening experience is both unlikely and psychologically impossible. Common response would be a disorganized emotional venting and vivid mental images of the events.

B. It’s unlikely and illogical for an adult not to call 911 under these conditions.

C. It is unlikely and illogical for an adult not to obtain further information from children under very unusual circumstances–an unplanned visit by six kids without an adult. It’s even more unlikely for an adult who had already heard gunfire not to call 911 nor to find out what had occurred.

D. The You Tube video of Rosen contradicts his main claim that for 15 minutes he did not know what had happened. In this video–at 22 seconds–Rosen reports concerns about the dead teacher, Ms. Vicki Soto.

Based upon A, B, C and D, it is reasonable to conclude that Gene Rosen misrepresented the truth of what occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School. It is quite reasonable to consider that Mr. Rosen was intentionally misinforming the public and the movie was filmed even before the alleged school shootings. The key evidence to support this possibility is the error in the movie regarding the death of Vicky Soto. This error is consistent with a signature trait of preplanned crimes. For instance Pres. Kennedy’s death was published in The Christchurch Star in New Zealand before the president was assassinated. Also, BBC announced the collapse of the seventh building on 9/11 some 23 minutes before the actual collapse.

Of importance, engineered complex crimes share a common denominator of evidence of advanced planning as shown by Rosen’s video and actions.

Remarkably, even though this discussion was included in the fourth round of the first debate, Michael Collins Piper appeared to be oblivious and made no response at all to my invitation.

Case Four: The School Security Expert

By the sheerest coincidence, I had come into contact with a nationally recognized expert on school security, Wolfgang Halbig, who is also a former Florida State Trooper and school principal. I was so impressed by his background and credentials that I did an interview with him as promptly as it could be arranged, where he had been attempting to obtain a copy of an FBI investigative report about Sandy Hook, but was repeatedly rebuffed and told it had been classified and that would not be released “in his lifetime”. That interview is now available here: http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2014...l#comment-form

Indeed, after contacting the FBI Field Office in New Haven, CT, seeking the investigative report on the school shooting under the Connecticut and US Freedom of Information Act, Wolfgang Halbig, who is both a former Florida State Trooper and also a former school principal, was informed that it was “classified” and that he would never see it. This report went to Attorney General Eric Holder, President Barack Obama and Robert S. Mueller, former Director of the FBI.

Because of his inquiries about Sandy Hook, two Lake County, FL, homicide investigators showed up at Mr. Halbig’s home and, on behalf of the Connecticut State Police, threatened him with prosecution should he continue to ask questions about Sandy Hook. I have spoken with him several times and he, too, is convinced that this was an elaborate hoax. “Why would they classify an FBI report about a school shooting”, he asks, “if it was on the up-and-up?”, which I regard as a very good question.

Wolfgang has observed that, in actual emergencies, such as Sandy Hook has been portrayed to be, med evac helicopters would have been on the scene to transport those little bodies to hospitals, where qualified doctors could determine whether they were dead or alive, which EMTs–apart from extraordinary cases, such as when the head has been separated from the body–are not authorized to do. Beyond the absence of med evac helicopters, a Connecticut State Police chopper was on the scene at 9:15 AM/ET, when the first 911 call would not come in until 9:35:39 AM/ET:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-i2kdmslVOa...e+shooting.jpg

Why Wolfgang Matters

As a school safety expert, Wolfgang’s opinions count in a courtroom, during depositions and in other legal contexts. He has emphasized to me the importance of determining who has lied about Sandy Hook, especially in giving depositions based only on their documented statements. He has offered two examples about officers who made calls about Sandy Hook:

Example: the police officer inside the Sandy Hook Elementary School who during a police transmission at 9:55:27 am on Dec 14, 2012 to the Newtown Police Dispatcher states in his own words that “Please be advised that we have multiple weapons including long weapon and shotgun inside the building”.

The officer who made this transmission has to be held accountable for his actions in this case, since he is reporting facts that are not in evidence and have not been substantiated by subsequent investigation. “Misdirection and Misinformation is what keeps people chasing their tail and creates serous confusion”, he has observed. As another illustration of an officer whose identity needs to be determined to be held accountable:

Example: a police officer during a police transmission at 10:00:45 am on Dec 14, 2012 to the dispatch is requesting “Doctors”–not a doctor, but “Doctors”–inside the school, yet they refused to allow the Paramedics or the EMTs inside the school. If this is was an urgency based on this radio transmission on Dec 14, 2012, then why was there no Trauma Helicopter request?

Wolfgang has observed that one way to get to the truth about Sandy Hook is to hold those who made these official transmissions accountable for their actions, especially when the weight of the evidence supports the conclusion that this was a drill but was presented as though it had been an actual school shooting massacre. The American people appear to have been brought to the edge of hysteria by an elaborate hoax.

Wolfgang under attack

Those who speak out on complex and controversial events like Sandy Hook (JFK, 9/11 or the Boston bombing) are invariably subjected to attacks, typically by exaggerating their positions to make them easier to attack (the “straw man”), by selecting evidence that supports your position and ignoring the rest (“special pleading”) or, especially, by attacking the messenger and hoping the message will be lost (the “ad hominem”).

Wolf has been no exception, where one of the latest attacks has challenged some of his 16 questions as though they had obvious answers or were simply irrelevant. One of the best exchanges with Wolf was conducted by “Tony”, who interviewed him in an exchange found on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QKceet1v2w. Those who have thought through their positions about Wolf are inclined to come to his support, as in the case of “Odinrock” endorsing him here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjiaswvXCw0

Because Wolf is soliciting donations to support his research into Sandy Hook and to initiate legal actions that are intended to reveal the truth, he has been assailed as a “money-grubber” who is acting to promote his own self-interest. But as the first one who interviewed Wolf and who makes frequent contact with him–and as he himself has observed–he is not making a dime from any of this. He deserves all of our support.

My friend who runs the NorthernTruthseeker blog has a new video posted on all the money raised for Sandy Hook. Instead of posting it here, I'm going to recommend that you watch it at his site, and that you check out the other info he's posted. Here's his site: http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot....ey-nearly.html

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/03...date-massacre/

Sandy Hook Shocker: Associated Press stories & photos predate the massacre

Posted on March 10, 2014 by Dr. Eowyn
Remember those heartbreaking RIP, Facebook, donation, and fundraiser webpages that were created several days BEFORE the actual massacre on Dec. 14, 2012, of 20 kids and 6 adults at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT? (See here and here.)
Remember that guide by the Crisis Management Institute on how to talk to children about Sandy Hook which was created four days BEFORE the massacre?
We were told that those pre-dated webpages, websites, and documents were merely due to computer glitches.
But what if I tell you that we have evidence of pre-dated Sandy Hook photos from none other than the venerable Associated Press? And that we’re not talking about one or two, but LOTS of photos? Nor is this about photos predated by a few days, but by MONTHS and YEARS?
Would you still say, “Pfft. It’s just a computer glitch”?
Are you ready?
*****************
Sipa Press is a French photo agency based in Paris and the leading photo agency in the world with 20 million pictures in its archives and 12 million in its digital database. Sipa Press distributes up to 6.000 newspictures every day — on politics, economy, entertainment and sports — to customers in more than 40 countries across the world. Sipa’s most important associates are the Associated Press, Rex Features in the United Kingdom and La Presse in Italy.
A blogger named Timothy Hunter gained access to Sipa Press‘ archives through his school. Hunter’s access ended “last semester,” but not before he was able to discover and record stunning evidence that many of the photos the Associated Press (AP) supposedly had taken on the Sandy Hook massacre had dates-of-creation that predated December 14, 2012.
This is Hunter’s video, presenting and describing his findings. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKLClNlsNCs


Like many people, I prefer a textual instead of a video account because:

• I simply don’t have the time or patience to sit and watch a long video (Hunter’s is 21:27 minutes long); and
• I’m better able to evaluate and retain the information from a textual account.

For those reasons, I’ve taken screenshots from Hunter’s video to re-state his findings as a post (click screenshot to enlarge). You can also read Hunter’s presentation of his findings on his Hunter News & Media blog.
AP stories with predated Google time stamps:

http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=314
Note that:
1. The Google time stamp for the “‘Always smiling’: Portraits of Conn. victims” AP story is November 18, 2012, which was 26 days before the Sandy Hook massacre when those “Conn. victims” actually became victims.
2. The Google time stamp for the “Colorado suspect was brilliant science student” AP story is June 15, 2012, which was 1 month 5 days before“brilliant science student” James Holmes became the “suspect” for the shooting deaths on July 20, 2012, of 14 and the wounding of another 50 people in a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado.
3. The Google time stamp for the “Boston bombing suspect buried in Virginia cemetery” AP story is February 17, 2010, which was a whopping 3 years 1 month and 28 days before Tamerlan Tsarnaev supposedly set off two bombs at the Boston Marathon on April 15, 2013.
Lest you think the Nov. 18, 2012 Google time stamp for the “Always smiling: Portraits of Conn. victims” AP story was a mere computer glitch, that AP story was reposted by Suntimes.com, with a publication date of Nov. 20, 2012 — 24 days before the actual Sandy Hook massacre:
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=193
And here’s another heartbreaking AP story, “Conn. Victims: Lively Youngsters, Devoted Adults,” being picked up by two other news media, abcnews and mysuncoast, with publication dates of Jul 22, 2012 and Nov 30, 2012, respectively — both well before the actual Sandy Hook massacre in which those “lively youngsters” and “devoted adults” had their lives tragically cut short:
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=197
Predated AP photos on Sandy Hook child victims -

with photo creation dates of June 15, 2012; Nov. 23, 2012; and Dec. 12, 2012 — which are, respectively, 6 months; 21 days; and 2 days BEFORE the tragic child “shooting victims” actually became “victims“:
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=216http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=325
Predated AP photos on aftermath of Sandy Hook massacre:

The following are a sample of AP photos of the immediate aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre, which Timothy Hunter had found in Sipa Press’s archives, every one of which has a creation date BEFORE the Dec 14, 2012 date of the massacre.
1. Here’s an AP photo of “a young girl” being “comforted following a shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, about 60 miles northeast of New York City” on Friday, December 14, 2012. Alas, the photo’s creation date is Dec. 13, 2012 — one day BEFORE the shooting:
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=398
2. Here’s a touching photo of first-graders at Devers Elementary School in York, releasing 26 balloons into the sky on Dec 21, 2012 “in memory of those who were killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School.” The only problem is the photo’s creation date was Dec. 12, 2012 — two days BEFORE the school massacre.
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=388


3. Another AP photo from the same Devers Elementary School children releasing 26 balloons, blah blah blah, with the same creation date of Dec 12, 2012, two days BEFORE the massacre:
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...pg?w=500&h=315


For the rest of the article and photos: http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/03...date-massacre/

I spoke with David Gahary over the phone (interview with Halbig that went viral)....he said he'll interview Halbig again, and then also cover the trip to Newtown, CT. Looking forward to this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dmhennen

I spoke with David Gahary over the phone (interview with Halbig that went viral)....he said he'll interview Halbig again, and then also cover the trip to Newtown, CT. Looking forward to this.

---

Great to see you finally on the forum!! That's good news about Gahary doing another interview with Halbig and covering the trip to Newtown. I wrote him at AFP and suggested they do some sort of investigative news story on Sandy Hook, by taking the video evidence of the school interior and exterior to a Fire Marshall, and getting his professional opinion as to whether a school in such dreadful condition, with numerous fire code violations would ever be allowed to operate. I never heard back from him, but it seems like something AFP could do.

I've got some notes from the school district budget....It appears the Sandy Hook school was due to be demolished anyway, and several of proposed updates for 2012, were "pushed out" during the budget process. Of all the school in Newtown, only SHES had a budget of $0 for repairs/improvements during the 2012-13 school year. Does that prove foreknowledge? Probably not, but it certainly raises a flag.

I noticed when watching that video of the image dates....
screen shot here:
http://fellowshipofminds.files.wordp...14/03/ap16.jpg

there was a picture just a little bit up the screen. He scrolled past it and I had to try and stop the video a couple times to see it.

It is a picture of Australia's Prime Minister at the time. (Julia Gillard - woman with red hair and a dark blue jacket) giving a press conference about Sandy Hook but the image was taken in September 2012. Thats ~3 months before Sandy Hook. Its posted 3 months before but the title/description says it was about Sandy Hook.

How did you reduce the size of that pic?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dmhennen

I've got some notes from the school district budget....It appears the Sandy Hook school was due to be demolished anyway, and several of proposed updates for 2012, were "pushed out" during the budget process. Of all the school in Newtown, only SHES had a budget of $0 for repairs/improvements during the 2012-13 school year. Does that prove foreknowledge? Probably not, but it certainly raises a flag.

---

Well, I think that info on the budget of $0 for repairs and improvements speaks to the fact that the school was not operational. I'm fairly certain that Wolfgang is going to be using FOIA requests to obtain documents that will go toward proving SHES was not operational, perhaps for many years. Since he's a former school administrator, he's familiar with all the various reports and documents that have to be prepared on an annual basis and available to the public (e.g. annual asbestos inspections, food services contracts), and he's attempting to get them all the way back to 2002.

Also, for those interested, Fetzer just posted a new audio on Sandy Hook with Kelly from Tulsa and KateSlate11 (youtuber): http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2014...l#comment-form

Though they definitely had some problems with the audio, I still thought it was worth listening to, especially the information on the recent New Yorker magazine article, which was full of absurdities.

@Glass, sorry, I don't know how to reduce the size of the photo. When I bring photos over I just copy and paste--I don't know how to adjust the size. Not sure what to make of that Gillard photo, do you have the time in the video?

10:21 on the video. Right most image

The left most image at that same time is of a girl in a blue sweater. When looking into the name of the photographer, it seems this image was take on the date shown on screen 11/18/2012 BUT it was actually taken by her Father and provided to AP. For some reason a 3rd person, who we might suppose is the (or an) photographer was given credit. I didn't find much else for the photographer but it raises questions about the dates on screen and exactly what dates they are.

I thought it could be useful to look at a few of these photographers being credited and see what they have been upto.

Of course this could be some back fill being done to explain away the disparity. Not sure.

It is clear that the Australian Prime Minister image was a stock image and not related to the actual events of Sandy Hook. i.e. not taken during a press conference regarding SH. Even though it is labelled as such.

For what it's worth, I already posted Fetzer's latest article on Wolfgang's plans to go to Newtown, but it looks like he's switched a video and now has one posted on the demolition of SHES, and right underneath that demolition video, in the text of the article, he links to a video done by SherrieQuestioningAll on whether SHES was operational, which is worth a look IMO. Anyway, for those interested: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03...ut-sandy-hook/

Also, if anyone has any suggestions or ideas, as far as moving things forward or others areas to look into, I'm sure Fetzer would appreciate hearing them in the comments section.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

Maybe it was a garment, or something? this angle it has more of a 3d relief.

http://tribwpmt.files.wordpress.com/...hook.jpg?w=900

---

Okay, I'm just following up on something I first read about on this blog http://sandyhooktruth.wordpress.com/ (which has been taken down) set up by Sunshine05, who used to post here. Anyway, someone on her blog mentioned that "CBYD" ("Call Before You Dig") was spray-painted on the pavement at SHES, which suggests that the school was already slated for demolition at the time of the event. I've been scrolling through pages of posts here and found the above photo--do you see that white line on the pavement from the school to the woods?? Do those letters below the line say "CBYD"?

Yes that's a marker for utility lines looks like spray paint (call before you dig),

so yeah they were slated to do some type of work back in that area recently, and someone marked it off.

Good catch, not sure it means demolition, or could be just a remodel. From what I can tell of the rest of the school (was working in L.V. on them myself about ten years ago) it was probably being tossed around as not being salvageable at all, or too ancient.

They still wouldn't have allowed any operation in that school without the exit lights you showed in that linked video unless those exits were somehow closed off permanently. Closed off, as not even recognizable as an exit, or entrance.

Attachment 6171

Attachment 6170

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...sell-Ebay.html

see those puddles built up on the roof, once that starts happening you're screwed for big repair bills.

all in all the top photo appears to be a structure that has not been maintained well for a season or more. the courtyard appears almost abandoned of landscaping, and the bottom most wall saturated from roof leakage.

the parking lot appears too well painted for the building its attached to.... and somebody has some dough to put up that temporary cyclone fence with screen all the way around it.

Sandy Hook school custodian linked to Crisis Actors East director

http://youtu.be/xZpxCM-vOto

Hello from Dachsie. Thanks for allowing me in. This is THE place for quality Sandy Hook info.

Hello,

I'm new here and wanted to bounce something off of this group.....It relates back to the "purple van"....this is a topic that has been brushed aside as "dis-info", "mis-info", "distraction", etc.

Police scanner: Purple van…..with two occupants….exit 8 down stony hill…..possible ski mask on….lady involved also….possible nun outfit?
Police scanner: chasing van…into danbury….at a high rate of speed….one in a ski mask….one dressed as a nun.
Police scanner: Use caution….might be a weapon involved…..might be a vehicle from the school shooting
Police scanner: occupants of the purple van are armed and dangerous
Police scanner: “unknown plates….high rate of speed”
Police scanner: “helicopter is following a purple/maroon van into Danbury”
Police scanner: DPD surround maroon van at 33 Crosby Street in Danbury

#1 - to the people saying this is dis-info, this was captured on the police audio on the morning of 12/14/12. It more-than-likely isn't fake.
#2 - if is was real, what HAPPENED to these people? (Has anyone researched the police logs from that day to see who these people were?
#3 - two people in the area (at 33 crosby street in Danbury), say nothing happened on that street at all that morning.

I would like to put this portion of 12/14 behind me, but it keeps creeping into the mix.

Any thoughts?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dmhennen

Hello,

I'm new here and wanted to bounce something off of this group.....It relates back to the "purple van"....this is a topic that has been brushed aside as "dis-info", "mis-info", "distraction", etc.

Police scanner: Purple van…..with two occupants….exit 8 down stony hill…..possible ski mask on….lady involved also….possible nun outfit?
Police scanner: chasing van…into danbury….at a high rate of speed….one in a ski mask….one dressed as a nun.
Police scanner: Use caution….might be a weapon involved…..might be a vehicle from the school shooting
Police scanner: occupants of the purple van are armed and dangerous
Police scanner: “unknown plates….high rate of speed”
Police scanner: “helicopter is following a purple/maroon van into Danbury”
Police scanner: DPD surround maroon van at 33 Crosby Street in Danbury

#1 - to the people saying this is dis-info, this was captured on the police audio on the morning of 12/14/12. It more-than-likely isn't fake.
#2 - if is was real, what HAPPENED to these people? (Has anyone researched the police logs from that day to see who these people were?
#3 - two people in the area (at 33 crosby street in Danbury), say nothing happened on that street at all that morning.

I would like to put this portion of 12/14 behind me, but it keeps creeping into the mix.

Any thoughts?

---

Yeah, I definitely remember that information. Right now, the way I kind of think of it is that that info was all a part of the initial storyline of the drill they were running, but then they suddenly flipped the storyline and changed it to Adam Lanza, killing his mother, a kindergarten teacher, and the other kids. Then, of course they had to fix that kindergarten teacher error.

Also, fwiw, I actually heard someone who claimed to be from that area call into the "From the Trenches" radio show on that day. Now this woman said something like she turned on the police scanner and initially heard info about nuns and a maroon van, and that it was almost kind of comical to listen to. She said that it suddenly seemed to flip and take a dire turn with the announcement of 20 dead. Now, I'll never be able to track this info down, though I posted it somewhere, but I'm a little suspect of this woman b/c from what I understand, weeks later she called into that show, saying that it was real and that she attended funerals.

But your idea on researching the police logs from that day seems like a good way to figure out whether this was real.

There were also all of those radio changes before the event http://wtfrly.com/2013/01/19/33-chan.../#.UzbdhMJOUdU

Okay, turns out I was wrong. I just did a quick search and found an old comment I posted on the caller who said the radio communications went from being almost comical to suddenly 20 dead:

The Word From the Trenches 2012.12.14 Radio show
http://grizzom.blogspot.nl/2013/01/v...manda1-im.html

Also, in the photo of SHES and the parking lot above (^#1271) does anyone see any handicapped parking spots??? Aren't schools supposed to have ADA compliant parking lots?? (The reason I bring that up is that a couple of people have been commenting over at Tracy's blog on how the SHES parking lot was not ADA compliant, which suggests the school may not have been operational for years).

And, fwiw, in response to one of the youtube videos on the interior conditions of SHES, a plumber commented that there was a problem with the bathrooms not being ADA compliant--he said in his area they were not up to code.

I have a question for the new members on this Newtown, CT false flag incident.

With so many events taking place all over the world, why the fixation on this one event?
Do you think there's a chance this will ever be exposed to the general public?

It looks like your beef on this is personal, or hits close to home? Maybe you are from the Newtown area?

Has anyone ever met any of the families of the supposed murdered children?
The only person I've ever seen interviewed, is Adam Lanza's supposed father.

For that matter, I've never seen anyone in the families, or that knew the families from flt 77 and Flt 93 (Pentagon & PA) interviewed either.

Carry on...

Welcome Dachsie and dmhennen! Investigate away.

I'll add to EE_, "...or MH370"?

It's coming "fast and furious", and we try and document it as we can.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dmhennen

I would like to put this portion of 12/14 behind me, but it keeps creeping into the mix.

Any thoughts?

---

decoy distraction to deter certain parts of police department away from the initial scene, or only those parts of the P.D. that were privy were allowed in early to rope it off from the rest. Could also be the reason you saw the groups of officers running thru the forest early on.

Otherwise moving children over to Gene Rosenberg's residence may have been noticed and intercepted also.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EE_

With so many events taking place all over the world, why the fixation on this one event?
Do you think there's a chance this will ever be exposed to the general public?

---

For me, it's a resistance to allowing "them" to create false realities/"news" ala SHoax & boston and presumably some other "tragedies" in recent years, in their push for their totalitarian, 1984ish/Brave-New-Worldish society.

On the 2nd question, don't know. I figure the more people "aware", the better odds of resistance to the society above... & the more instant mass skepticism of their future faked "events", where the ...Reaction...Solution portions don't happen as "they" calculated.

The 'net shills are hard at work; this is re an SHoax thread, good comments too:

Forum Shill gets Busted: ATS and GLP Censor to Cover his Tracks