Coronavirus

The COVID-19 Disease - GIGO


Bad data: How three Covid stats traumatized the world

by: WorldTribune.com 06/07/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com

Analysis by WorldTribune Staff, June 7, 2022

Three outrageously unreliable Covid-19 statistics — number of deaths, number of cases, and number of adverse reactions to the vaccines — created major polarization throughout the world, the co-director of Alliance for Health International said.

Rob Verkerk, Ph.D., in a June 3 analysis for The Defender, called out health authorities for an "orchestrated, global deception and broad mismanagement" of the Covid pandemic.

The analysis noted that official figures on Covid deaths, cases, and adverse reactions to the jab, all "tend to be unreliable, spurious or are widely misrepresented or misinterpreted, and cannot be relied upon to understand the real impacts of C19 disease, as distinguished from the impacts of the human response, statistical noise or statistical manipulation."

Covid deaths

Reported Covid-19 deaths "were always conflated with other causes, as, in the majority of countries, they always represented deaths reported from any cause that occurred within specified time frames (e.g. 28 days, 60 days) of a positive C19 antigen (usually Polymerase Chain Reaction, or PCR) test," Verkerk noted.

"Many of these reported deaths were in hospitals where the sickest people tend to go, and hospitals were also among the most likely places to contract an infection, and certainly, the most likely place to test for C19 status using a flawed diagnostic technique, based on the various C19 RT-PCR (real time-PCR) platforms," Verkerk added. "So we’re left with no accurate way of measuring C19 disease impact accurately, just a proxy for C19 disease impact: a comparison of all-cause mortality against the expected average mortality, in other words so-called 'excess mortality.' "

Official data from Our World in Data shows that the countries with the highest excess mortality rates also tended to have among the highest rates of "full vaccination."

"We’ve got to try to unpack why there is increased excess mortality across all 28 EuroMOMO (European mortality monitoring) partner countries in 2021, compared with 2020, in all age groups between 15 and 74," Verkerk wrote. "How much of this was mortality induced by C19, and how much was caused by the breakdown of primary and secondary healthcare services during the 'pandemic'? Could the vaccines have played a part as well? It would be foolish to ignore this possibility given that the excess mortality in progressively younger age groups is delayed, as was the roll-out of C19 'vaccines.' "

In the U.S., data from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) shows that deaths did not decrease following vaccination "despite successive variants losing pathogenic strength and authorities claiming the vaccines were protecting people from severe disease and death," Verkerk noted.

"We’re a long way from authorities withdrawing the intense coercion to force people, especially those who have consistently resisted, into using genetic vaccines that have delivered marginal benefit and extensive, yet greatly under-reported, harms."

Covid cases

The data for reporting Covid cases "are afflicted with several important methodological problems," Verkerk wrote.

The problems include:

1. RT-PCR tests were rolled out globally with no gold standard meaning there was no accurate way of determining the positive predictive value of the many different testing platforms used as the primary diagnostic method.

2. Initial case data were based on PCR tests that were classified as positive sometimes with well over 30 amplification cycles (cycle threshold, CT). Such tests with high CT values (>28) typically measure RNA fragments that are not from a “live” virus that can replicate and cause C19 disease. Different testing authorities and countries imposed limits on CTs at different times so evaluating case data throughout the two-plus years of the “pandemic” period is like comparing apples with oranges. Given CT is inversely proportional to viral load, a much better and more accurate picture of disease status in space and time could have been revealed had CT data also been shared widely where these data were available.

3. PCR and related CT data should never be used in isolation from the clinical picture and history. Yet PCR was used as the primary diagnostic for C19 disease (while often ignoring other respiratory or other diseases) — for the first time in history, in the absence of assessments of clinical disease or pathology. Eliminating the gathering of information that helps the clinician build a picture of an individual’s clinical history and replacing it with genetic sequencing techniques for diagnosis could one day be seen as one of the gravest errors in medicine. It focuses people on a genetic pathogen or risk factor and ignores the importance of the environment, the terrain (“constitution”) and epigenetics, that ultimately controls our genetic expression and phenotypic vehicle we’re gifted with during our lifetimes.

4. Any diagnostic disease yields more false positives when prevalence declines. This is a statistical artifact described by Bayes’ theorem and it is recognized by all health authorities (e.g. World Health Organization), yet it is rarely discussed or publicized. This artifact means that you can effectively have a never-ending pandemic because as the prevalence drops close to zero, false positives increase giving the impression of increased disease prevalence.

Vaccine adverse events

The statistics from the officially reported U.S. adverse event data (VAERS), as they stand currently, "should be enough to make front-page news," Verkerk wrote. "Instead, we continue to hear health authorities parrot the deception that C19 injections are 'safe.' "

https://www.worldtribune.com/wp-cont.../06/vaers2.jpg

"In the recent climate of coercion and brainwashing, many cases go unreported," Verkerk wrote. "This might mean that reporting is even lower, potentially much lower, than the 1% underreporting for vaccines suggested by Harvard researchers investigating the VAERS system."

What the adverse events reports are able to take into account, Verkerk added, "is that adverse reactions triggered by one or chronic exposure to the injections might take months or even years to manifest or be recognized. Such as fertility issues, the triggering of autoimmune conditions, heart tissue scarring, or damage to the brain and other parts of the neurological system."

Verkerk continued: "And rather than castigating those doctors and other health practitioners that are awake to the seriousness of these C19 jab injuries, how about some gratitude, respect and support for this marginalized group who continue to be true to the Hippocratic oath that they’ve committed to. Whilst often facing witch-hunts, risking or losing their previous careers and sometimes even risking their personal safety."

Given what we have all experienced over the past two-plus years, who would trust healthy authorities or the major corporate media to provide accurate scientific or medical reporting?

What has happened, Verkerk noted, is that, when it comes to news, "supply and demand being what it is, is already driving the creation of better, more objective, more balanced new media, with a plethora of actors. A new media that understands that paid-for science and conflicted scientists with vested interests are hardly going to provide a representative picture of what’s really going on or what we should do to protect ourselves and our communities."

Additionally, cheap natural treatments, such as vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc and quercetin, as well as a product originating from a humble soil-dwelling bacterium — ivermectin — "were the clear winners over the billions spent on novel genetic injections," Verkerk wrote.

Most of all, Verkerk concluded, "we’ve learned that many of us will stand shoulder to shoulder and find ways, regardless of the scale of the Goliath we face, to maintain sufficient frequency within our minds and bodies to not onboard approaches being thrust on us by the ruling authoritarians that simply don’t make sense to our own and unique systems of values, principles and beliefs. That’s going to be a prerequisite for what’s in store for us — because if you think we’re now able to stroll through the post-covid plains into the sunset, think again."

ADMIN MAY FIRE THOUSANDS OF BORDER AGENTS

The Biden administration could terminate thousands of Border Patrol agents for not submitting to COVID shots, despite agencies on the border struggling to manage the gravest illegal migration crisis in national history. A court decision that could come as soon as this Friday may allow the Biden administration to begin firing the border officers. One agent told the Washington Examiner that “dozens and dozens” of his colleagues have already applied for early retirement over the threat of the Biden vax mandate.


READ the story here

Thousands of unvaccinated Border Patrol agents fear for their future

by Anna Giaritelli, Homeland Security Reporter |
| June 07, 2022

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/9...-palo-alto?s=r

9 elderly jabbed --> 6 dead at Palo Alto Commons?

I need your help to verify this incredible story. I heard it from a reliable source who knows one of the family members of the deceased. It's not the kind of story you joke about. PAC won't talk.

Steve Kirsch
June 8, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1024x768.jpeg

Common room at Palo Alto Commons elderly living facility

Recently, I heard an incredible story of vaccine injury that is a stunning example of why the vaccine isn’t safe for anyone, no matter how young or old you are:

Nine residents of Palo Alto Commons were given the jab and less than 1 week later, six were dead.

One of the dead was a former Federal Judge: Joan Stevenson Brennan Passell, but there was no obituary I could find. You can call up the public records office and, if you have a name, you can verify the deceased which I will do tomorrow.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...3_150x150.jpeg
Former Federal Judge Joan Stevenson Brennan Passell

Silence from Palo Alto Commons

I reached out to Palo Alto Commons, but nobody would comment. They all referred me to the Palo Alto Commons Executive Director Li Li:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...11_268x389.png

When she didn’t return my call, I visited the facility, saw her going to lunch, walked up and introduced myself as a journalist working on a story, and asked her to verify the information about the jabs and the deaths. She said I would have to send my request in writing.

Here’s what I wrote:

Can you provide me with the number of Palo Alto Commons residents vaccinated each month and the number of residents who were vaccinated who then passed away (or who were no longer a resident) within 4 weeks of the shot? While you are not required to supply this information to me, I would hope that as a human being you would realize that such information can save lives.

After I did that, she promptly responded with the following note:

Due to confidentiality reasons and HIPAA considerations, we are not at liberty to comment one way or another on our resident's current or past status as it relates to their health, COVID situation or vaccination status. While we appreciate your concern and interest, we kindly refer you to the Santa Clara County Public Health Department, who is probably better suited to provide you with the type of information you mentioned below. The SCPHD information is listed below.

The information I requested is not covered by HIPAA or confidentiality since no personally identifiable information was ever requested.

Isn’t it funny that when COVID hits, we have exact numbers of people dying from COVID that are released. But when the vaccines hit the same facilities, the deaths from the vaccine suddenly becomes confidential. Explain that for me please!
Why I think they are hiding something

In my opinion they are hiding this information just like every other nursing home.

The reasons I believe this are:

The source of the info is a family member of one of the deceased

People don’t make up stories like that if they aren’t true. It’s not something you joke about.

The family member now refuses to comment.

None of the people at Palo Alto Commons will talk. They all appear very nervous when I ask the question about the deaths and tell me to talk to the executive director.

The executive director stonewalls my request using excuses that don’t apply.

I’ve heard the local Walgreens comes in and give the shots to the residents there.

Can anyone help me shine some light on what happened?

I would be happy to supply financial incentives as necessary so that we can verify the story.

A civil wrongful death lawsuit brought by a family member of one of the deceased is another way for us to shed some light on what happened here. I’ve heard that these suits can have million dollar settlements.
Private detective

Yes, I already engaged one a week ago.
VAERS reports

There is this VAERS report which is one of a series of 6 deaths reported to VAERS after injection at a elderly care home.

I wonder if the story was relayed incorrectly and that there were 6 deaths within 5 weeks of the vaccine.

The VAERS IDs are:

1373835

1373836

1381213

1381214

1381215

1381218

Here is what 836 says:

Reporter stated that So, he doesnt exactly know. His grandfather was the first phase to get the Pfizer vaccination (Confirmed as Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine) back in March (Further not clarified). He was in a residential home with 5 other elderly residents with him. They all got vaccinated with the first Pfizer shot (Confirmed as Covid 19 vaccine) and they all died within the 5 weeks after their first shot. Honestly the only thing that he can pinpoint with my aunt and other people and loved ones we have talked to come together because only two of the residents were on hospice and the other people were not on hospice. They should not have died they just died. he doesnt know if it was a side effect, he knows if it was a reaction but all of the six residents that got vaccinated died within their first vaccination shot. Within the 5 weeks after the first vaccination. He was not sure other residents got the second vaccination, but his grandfather died 09Feb2021. Reporter stated he only have detail for his grandfather and other residents, and they died in their sleep supposedly. They died in their sleep. Both of them died in their sleep (Further not clarified hence not captured in tab). He just feels, his grandfather was not on hospice he was healthy considering the underlying problem that they had but they were supposed to get vaccinated with the Moderna and the day that we got there they changed the vaccination to Pfizer. So, they had the on-duty nurse there to answer any of the questions that we had. We asked then all the questions we had. We felt ok with it, everybody got vaccinated that day. My grandfather died within a week and a half after his after vaccination. So, he didnt get the second and by the middle of march their resident also died. The only thing I can tie to it is the first dose of Pfizer vaccination.

Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Thousands of paid subscribers

I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.

https://usawatchdog.com/cv19-vax-dea...y-edward-dowd/

CV19 Vax Deadliest Fraud in History – Edward Dowd

https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...ic-300x231.png


embedded video

50:16 video runtime

also on Rumble

https://rumble.com/v17omi3-cv19-vax-deadliest-fraud-in-history-edward-dowd.html

Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he as he goes One-on-One with money manager and investment expert Edward Dowd for 6.7.22.

By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

Wall Street money manager Edward Dowd has made billions of dollars for companies such as Black Rock picking good businesses with good products. He can also spot a fraud, and Dowd says Pfizer simply made up the research that said it’s CV19 vaccine was safe and effective. According to Dowd, it was neither safe or effective. Dowd says, “The data was garbage. As far as I am concerned, they made up the data. It was garbage.” Dowd thinks the CV19 injections will be the deadliest fraud in history. Dowd explains, “This is something we have never seen in the history of our country and the history of the world for that matter. We have a product (CV19 Vax) that is so fraudulent and so deadly from an acute basis and kills you right away, but the long-term implications of this health impact we don’t know yet. It’s looking grim. This is going to be with us for decades. This is going to change the face of the world. We have to try to control the outcome because people are going to try to take advantage of this and spin it and turn it into the ‘great reset.’ We are not going to allow the ‘great reset’ to happen. If it happens, it’s going to happen under our power, and we are going to take control and not some nameless elites that say I am going to own nothing and eat bugs.”

Some people say the perpetrators of the deadly vax fraud are going to get away with it. Dowd says not a chance and explains, “The problem with this fraud is it is a bridge too far. 220 million Americans took the vax (at least one shot). Three million Americans are disabled, and it’s probably higher, and those disabilities are going to continue to grow. The economic impact, the young working age men and women dying in their families and the psychological effects show this is not your run of the mill financial fraud. This is a different kind of fraud, and this is a trust issue. It violated trust on so many levels that the politicians are going to turn on these people at some point. . . . These things don’t end until the elite pay a personal price, and that’s where we are headed. Some of these people are going to pay a very personal price. I don’t wish that on them, and this is why they need to come forward and start whistleblowing so they can be protected in jails. These crimes are so difficult to hide that there will be that kind of action. If you look at the story of Marie Antoinette and the saying “Let them eat cake,” the French Revolution did not end well for the elites. The consciousness is rising in this country at an alarming fast rate. . . .”

How does Dowd know we have passed an inflection point? Dowd says, “In October, November and December of last year, people all over the media, celebrities and people I knew were saying the unvaccinated are the problem and they need to be put in camps. Well, that chatter has disappeared. They have not apologized for that, but doubts are starting to enter people’s minds. . . . It’s like the stages of grief. The first one is denial, then anger, then depression and then acceptance. We are in the denial/anger stage. We are still in the denial part, but we are quickly approaching anger.”

In the economy and what’s coming, Dowd points out, “What’s going on is we are basically at the end of the super bubble. . . . We are going to have to have a new economic system . . . and what’s going on is the collapse of that. The defaults are coming, and they are going to start in other countries first and make their way here. . . .It’s going to be a disaster, and we are going to see a huge amount of defaults, bankruptcies and collapse of the economy. . . .99.9% of the world does not know the social contract has been broken. What does that mean? It means all the entitlements, social security, the pensions, and there are a lot in Europe, they are gone. They are not going to get paid. That’s the bottom line.”


After the Interview:

Follow Edward Dowd on Twitter by clicking here.
https://twitter.com/DowdEdward

______________

Follow Edward Dowd on Gettr by clicking here.
https://gettr.com/user/edwarddowd

A new point about the missing virus

June 8, 2022

by Jon Rappoport


Actually, this is a point I’ve made before, but now I’m boiling it down to the bare essentials.

Here we go:

If you were a) honest and b) the head of a major public health agency, there is something you would do, before declaring COVID a worldwide pandemic requiring extraordinary measures (e.g., lockdowns).

You would carry out a study.

A study to confirm that a newly discovered virus (SARS-CoV-2) really exists and is causing illness and death on a global scale.

After all, that is the claim. So wouldn’t you want to prove it’s true? Wouldn’t you feel compelled to do that—rather than just SAY it’s so?

This study wouldn’t focus on 20 or 30 or 50 patients. Those numbers are far too small. We’re not talking about the assertion of a minor viral outbreak. This is supposedly a titanic disaster.

You would gather together a few thousand people, at minimum.

All these people have been diagnosed with the purported pandemic infection.

You would take tissue samples from these patients and analyze them. You would test them for the presence of the new virus.

How could you NOT?

—And yet, such a study WAS NEVER DONE.

NEVER.

Try making excuses for that omission.

We’re talking about science on such a basic level, a child would understand it. You say X is causing a global pandemic—so test for the presence of X. Test for it in a sufficient number of people. Immediately.

Since you’re claiming more than a billion people could become infected, surely you should test at least a few thousand people, to make sure you’re right.

THIS WAS NEVER DONE as one complete study.

Now, we could certainly argue about the kind of test you should run to see if the virus is present. Is the test accurate? Is it reliable? Is it relevant? Of course. I’ve covered that subject exhaustively. But here I’m putting all that aside. The point is, you WOULD test for the virus.

Even the staunchest most rabid defenders of the existence of SARS-CoV-2 would have to agree, if they were being honest.

In other articles, I’ve offered much proof that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist—but here I’m just making the most basic of points: RUN THE STUDY, DO THE TEST.

So what do I get in the way of replies from the “defenders?” They completely ignore the need for the wide-ranging study I’m demanding; and instead they persist in offering up small studies that focus on three patients, 40 patients—as if that is sufficient for declaring a global pandemic and wreaking massive destruction, by lockdowns and other measures.

They keep insisting these little minor studies are sufficient. Why? Because that’s all they have. So they pretend they’re doing good science.

They’re not.

They’re faking it.

Some of them know they’re faking it.

Here’s an analogy anyone should be able to understand. Putting aside lying and cheating and fabricating in doing studies, when a company wants to gain approval from the FDA for a new drug or a new vaccine, how many people do they enroll in their clinical trials, to prove safety and efficacy?

THOUSANDS.

Not three, or 50.

Pfizer enrolled 30,000 people in their clinical trial of the RNA COVID vaccine.

Why didn’t they just enroll 40?

Because they couldn’t get away with it.

I’m talking about standard research practice here.

So why doesn’t the same standard practice apply to proving the existence of a virus that is supposedly causing widespread illness and death across the world?

The rabid defenders of the virus also try to make this point: since millions and millions of people have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, this proves the virus exists and is causing terrible damage.

This is what I call “after the fact” proof.

By that standard, Pfizer would have been able to market its COVID vaccine without any clinical trials at all.

No. The proof required for a major medical/scientific assertion comes WHEN THE ASSERTION IS FIRST MADE, before all sorts of brutal measures are taken that are based on that assertion.

The rabid defenders of the virus twist and distort science to fit their agenda—and then claim OF COURSE everybody knows the virus exists.

You buy what they’re selling at your own peril. They have their story and they’re telling it over and over.

They’re naked, walking in the rain, pitching you raincoats.

https://www.wanttoknow.info/h/corona...ony-fauci-60pg

free download

60 pages

excerpt

THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI

THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI
Summary of the Summary

Key Points:

• While Tony Fauci has been with NIAID for 50 years, America's health has seriously declined.

• During the pandemic, Fauci fraudulently derailed America's access to hydroxychloroquine as well
as ivermectin, a Nobel Prize winning safe and effective early treatment.

• Remdesevir is significantly more dangerous than either, and 1000x more expensive.

• Covid jabs have caused over 17,000 deaths with hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions.

• Through the AIDS crisis, experiments on children, vaccines mandated in Third World countries
and global epidemics, Dr. Fauci and Pharma associates have rigged virtually all the critical drug
approval panels, approving virtually every new drug, with or without safety studies, receiving
royalty payments on drugs they help develop and usher through the approval process.

• Fauci partnered with the Pentagon to approve taxpayer-funded “gain-of-function” experiments to
breed pandemic superbugs in poorly regulated labs in Wuhan, China and elsewhere, under
conditions that almost certainly guaranteed the escape of weaponized microbes like SARS-CoV-2.

• Simulated Germ Games over the last 20 years have gotten governments, health agencies, and the
media on board a lockstep approach to totalitarianism and mandated vaccines.


SNIP

Source:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wTu9y5u9N34q/

Thanks to Michael Ivey

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fo...er-found-dead/

Founder of vaccine safety website, ex-pharma insider found dead

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fo...er-found-dead/

lifesitenews.comJune 7, 20220 Comments

https://vaticancatholic.com/images/f...found-dead.jpg

'If something were to happen to me,' Brandy Vaughan wrote in late 2019, 'it’s foul play and you know exactly who and why.'

Brandy Vaughan, a former sales executive for the pharmaceutical company Merck and the founder of learntherisk.org, a website dedicated to educating people on the risks associated with vaccines, was apparently found dead by her nine-year-old son on December 8.

According to Children’s Health Defense, Vaughan is reported to have died of “gallbladder complications,” although the source of the report has not been cited, nor has it shared the specific cause of the complications (such as a gallbladder rupture).

Soon after learning of her death, a friend of Vaughn’s, Erin Elizabeth, shared screenshots of a Facebook post Vaughan had written in December of 2019, in which she assured readers that she was not suicidal and did not take any drugs that would cause her to die suddenly.

“The post I wish I didn’t have to write…. But given certain tragedies over the last couple of years, I feel it’s absolutely necessary to post these ten facts… please screenshot this for the record,” wrote Vaughan.

“I have a huge mission in this life. Even when they make it very difficult and scary, I would NEVER take my own life. Period,” she continued.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-cont...1-520x9999.jpg

Referring to her son, Vaughan wrote, “Bastien means everything to me and I would NEVER leave him. Period. She added that she hadn’t taken pharmaceuticals for ten years. “In other words, I’m not on anything that could kill me unexpectedly or suddenly,” she wrote.

“If something were to happen to me, it’s foul play and you know exactly who and why — given my work and mission in this life,” she continued...

Image

https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-cont...2-520x9999.jpg

Vaughan, who used to work as a pharmaceutical sales representative for Merck, explained how she got started as an activist exposing the dangers of vaccines and pharmaceutical industry in a video shared in 2015. She begins by revealing that she used to represent Merck’s drug Vioxx.

“When it came out that Merck had falsified safety data and Vioxx actually had twice the increase in heart attacks and strokes [for] people taking it, it really made me realize that there was a lot of corruption behind the scenes and that just because a drug is on the market doesn't mean it's safe,” Vaughan said in the video.

She explained how later, during a wellness visit for her son, a doctor “stormed out of the room” when she asked to see a vaccine insert.

“That was a huge red flag for me, knowing what I knew from being a pharmaceutical sales rep before. And I started to do my research into vaccines and the ingredients and the flawed safety data.”

Part of what she discovered is that aluminum is a major adjuvant in vaccines, which was another big “red flag” for her. When her grandmother was diagnosed with breast cancer, the doctor found high levels of aluminum in her tissues. He told her that the aluminum found in traditional deodorant was linked to breast cancer.

“The more I dug into this, what I realized was vaccines are not for public health. It’s really about pharmaceutical company profit. It’s basically playing Russian Roulette with our children,” continued Vaughan.

“I really got motivated to get more into this fight when I realized the mandatory vaccination bills that were sweeping the country[.]”

Vaughan went on to found Learn The Risk, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, “in response to one of the nation’s first mandatory vaccination for education laws — SB277 in California,” according to her website. SB277, which was signed into law in 2015, “barred parents from citing their personal beliefs as a reason for not vaccinating their children” for school.

It was when Vaughan returned from a rally protesting SB277 in Sacramento that she first began to experience acts of intimidation, she explained in a video shared in 2015.

She described how she came home from Sacramento to find a key to her house, which she had previously hidden in her bushes, out on her doorstep. “That day I had my locks changed and I installed a $3,000 alarm system two days later,” said Vaughan.

She was later informed by her alarm company that someone had set off her alarm at 3:45 in the morning and immediately disarmed it with the master code, which Vaughan said no one had but her. Whoever entered proceeded to walk down her hallway, setting off the monitor sensor, and opened and shut her dining room window before leaving the house at 3:49 a.m.

“After the incident I talked to some security experts who have actually done intimidation for corporations, and they said, they were probably tapping your place.”

Vaughan described how only days later, she found her computer moved from its hiding place above her microwave to the middle of her kitchen floor. After leaving town for a couple of weeks, she returned with a friend to find her ladder, which she had kept in her garage, just outside a bedroom window of her house — the only window with the blinds kept open. A neighbor informed her that she hadn’t seen the ladder there the day before.

Only days after that, she found a duck figurine on one of her outdoor tables. “When I talked to the security experts, I said, I don’t understand the duck. And then it came to me that I had been on my phone having a lot of conversations [with] people asking me, are you staying at your house? What are you going to do? And I use the term repeatedly: I’m not staying at my house. I feel like a sitting duck, because they can get in at any time.”

“So that was actually quite disturbing to come home to. It’s just a clear message that, again, they are watching me.”

“It’s quite scary. After all these intimidation tactics it's very hard to feel safe and secure, but I am not gonna go away — I mean I’m not gonna be silenced, because these are important issues, and we need to expose what’s really going on behind the mandatory vaccination bills.”

“I hope that we can continue this fight. We may have lost the battle but we still have a war to win,” Vaughan concluded.

In her 2019 Facebook post, Vaughan wrote, “If something were to happen to me, I have arranged for a close group of my friends to start a GoFundMe to hire a team of private investigators to figure out all the details.”

“There have been many on this mission or a similar one that have been killed and it’s time this b——- stopped. The darkness cannot win.”

_________
Dachsie comment:

This apparently happened 2 years ago.

Tue Dec 15, 2020 - 8:33 pm EST

but Vaticancatholic site posted it

Founder of vaccine safety website, ex-pharma insider found dead
lifesitenews.comJune 7, 2022 0 Comments

December 15, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Brandy Vaughan, a former sales executive for the pharmaceutical company Merck and the founder of learntherisk.org, a website dedicated to educating people on the risks associated with vaccines, was apparently found dead by her nine-year-old son on December 8.[/B]

FDA Set to Authorize Novavax Despite Heart Risk

An FDA advisory board this week recommended Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Novavax’s COVID-19 shot. The FDA’s committee of “independent vaccine experts” voted 21 to 0 with one abstention at the end of an all-day meeting to recommend authorizing the shot for use in the U.S. after an all-day public meeting in which it weighed safety and effectiveness data.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...FgrrQmjQyg--~D

Less than a week ago, the FDA raised concerns about the risk of myocarditis (heart inflammation) associated with the shot. Here’s what the FDA’s own report found: “Multiple events of myocarditis/pericarditis were reported in temporal relationship to NVX-CoV2373 administration, similar to myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and raising concern for a causal relationship to NVX-CoV2373.”


Nevertheless, the advisory committee recommended just a few days later that the FDA award EUA to the Novavax shot. There have been 1,287,593 adverse reactions, 160,701 hospitalizations, and 28,532 deaths associated with the COVID shots reported to VAERS.


How many more have to be injured or killed?


>> GET THE FULL STORY HERE <<

https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/fd...te-heart-risk/

FDA Set to Approve Novavax Despite Heart Risk

By Ty & Charlene Bollinger
June 8, 2022

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...spike-protein/

One more time: where is the spike protein?

June 9 2022

by Jon Rappoport

I was going to recapitulate the evidence that the virus, SARS-CoV-2, doesn’t exist. But I decided to leave it out of this article. I’m just going to focus on the vaccine and what it’s supposed to be doing.

Let’s say you’re a vaccine researcher. You develop a new type of shot that deploys RNA.

The RNA, when injected, has one purpose. It induces cells of the body to produce something called the spike protein. That’s it.

According to your theory, the body’s immune system will spring into action and mount a neutralizing attack against this protein.

As result, when the “real thing” comes along—the virus, which contains the spike protein—the vaccinated person will be protected. His immune system will ward off the virus.

Since, again, the whole and only reason you’re injecting the RNA shot is to make the body produce the spike protein…

Aren’t you going to make sure the body is, in fact, producing that protein?

Of course you are.

How will you do that?

In the only way you can.

You’ll line up 10 or 20 thousand vaccinated people and test them.

You’ll test them to make sure you can find that spike protein in their bodies.

So show me the study.

Show me that vaccine researchers and vaccine makers and the FDA actually had that study done.

Where is it?

I’m not talking about looking at three patients in China or Berlin or New York. I’m talking about an extensive test to make sure the vaccine is doing the ONE thing it’s supposed to be doing. Across the population.

I don’t see that study anywhere.

A couple of people have told me, “Well, OF COURSE the vaccine causes the body to make the spike protein. That’s what the RNA technology is all about. We KNOW that. The technology is WELL ESTABLISHED.”

So is the safety of drugs, until the drugs start killing lots of people.

I want something simple. Verification. Across the population. Verification that the vaccine is doing the one thing it’s supposed to be doing.

And I want to know why this verification hasn’t been attempted.

One professor actually told me, “Perhaps you might be able to devise a test that would detect the spike protein directly in the body…but it might be very difficult to do that…”

Really? In other words, a vaccine was developed to do a thing it might be impossible to verify?

And this was understood up front?

A few months ago, someone sent me a study. She said the study showed the spike protein HAD been found in vaccinated people. I read the study. First of all, the authors were reporting on just a few people. No good. Not useful. Second, as far as I could tell, the method of finding the spike protein was suspect. It relied on detecting indirect and unreliable markers that supposedly proved (but didn’t prove) that the protein was present in these few people. No good. Not useful.

Where is the large correctly done study?

I don’t find it anywhere.

Dr. Andrew Kaufman, who has dismantled and exposed the non-scientific process by which virologists’ claimed to have discovered SARS-CoV-2, offers these important comments about the spike protein:

“You can buy a readily available SARS-Cov-2 Spike protein antibody which can be used in a standard western blot or ELISA to test recipients of the injections for the spike protein. This is cheap and easy to do. Why hasn’t it been done?”

I believe the answer is clear. The scientists and bureaucrats in charge don’t want to run the test. They want to avoid finding out whether the one thing the vaccine is supposed to achieve isn’t being achieved. They want to avoid finding out the vaccine, on their own terms, is a total failure.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aE1PJPog8Alz/

https://www.bitchute.com/static/v137...nk_640x360.png

https://www.bitchute.com/static/v137...nk_640x360.png

https://www.bitchute.com/static/v137...nk_640x360.png

https://www.bitchute.com/static/v137...nk_640x360.png


Microbiologist Says Vaccines will Decimate World’s Population

39:12 video runtime

First published at 14:05 UTC on April 22nd, 2021.

channel image

Jim Fetzer

Jim Fetzer

11219 subscribers

AMAZING recent statement from well-known microbiologist, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi. GREAT explanations for why the CV19 "vaccine" is deadly. "I don't want a vaccine that might kill me to protect against a cold." Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, an American-trained microbiologist now living in Germany, says the Covid-19 pandemic is a fraud because it is based on case and death statistics that are 99% false. He also says that mRNA vaccines are, not only loaded with poisons, they alter the natural immune system in such a way that it will greatly overreact when the victims are exposed later to almost any pathogen including the common flu. They will be attacked by their own immune system, a process known as autoimmune disorder. These attacks are more deadly than the disease itself. Dr. Bhakdi begs people not to take the vaccine, especially if they already have taken a first shot. If they do, he says, they will cause a decimation of the world’s population.