-
Re: Coronavirus
https://rumble.com/v18ie08-attorney-...st-pfizer.html
Pfizer admits to fraud in court
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...PNecbKY1aw--~D
stkirsch Published June 15, 2022 2,110 Views
2:43 video runtime
Brook Jackson is the Pfizer whistleblower. Her attorney, Robert Barnes, says that Brook Jackson exposed the fact that the Pfizer clinical trial was riddled with errors and fraudulent and false certifications to the US government.
Pfizer's defense presented in court is that the FDA knew about the fraud and was in on it, therefore, there isn't any fraud.
In short, he basically said that in a court proceeding Pfizer admitted things were fraudulent.
The FDA needs to investigate this admission by Pfizer of fraud, don't you think?
___________
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/p...urce=email&s=r
Open in browser
Pfizer admits to fraud in court
Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn't fraud. Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's attorney, Robert Barnes, isn't buying the argument.
Steve Kirsch
Jun 15
Comment
Share
You really can’t make this stuff up. You gotta watch this video… it’s only 2 minutes. And it will be a key piece of evidence in my next move which you’ll learn about shortly.
In a nutshell, Pfizer admits in court to fraud, but says it isn’t fraud because the government was in on it. I bet you never heard that defense before.
embedded video
2:43 video runtime
also on rumble see above
Pfizer admits to fraud in court
Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn't fraud. Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's attorney, Robert Barnes, isn't buying the argument.
Steve Kirsch
2 hr ago
You really can’t make this stuff up. You gotta watch this video… it’s only 2 minutes. And it will be a key piece of evidence in my next move which you’ll learn about shortly.
In a nutshell, Pfizer admits in court to fraud, but says it isn’t fraud because the government was in on it. I bet you never heard that defense before.
Dachsie comment:
Brooke Jackson versus Pfizer.
Brooke Jackson was the manager of a Ventavia [a Pfizer subcontractor that runs clinical trials] study for Pfizer in a Texas Ventavia facility and observed many irregular practices. She reported these to FDA with the evidence and was promptly fired.
Viva Frei of Canada and Robert Barnes of USA are attorneys discussing this in the video.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://trib247.com/articles/vaers-covid-vax-update-nearly-1-3-million-adverse-vaccine-events-28-000-deaths?utm_source=PMI&utm_medium=deployer&utm_camp aign=Newsletter
VAERS Covid vax update: Nearly 1.3 million adverse vaccine events, 28,000 deaths
by: WorldTribune.com 06/14/2022 Source: WorldTribune.com
https://structurecms-production-psyc...jpg?1655224102
by WorldTribune Staff / 247 Real News June 14, 2022
According to VAERS data released by the CDC on Friday, between Dec. 14, 2020, and June 3, 2022 there have been 1,295,329 reports of adverse events from all age groups following Covid vaccines, including 28,714 deaths and 236,767 serious injuries.
The new data includes an increase of 182 deaths and 1,726 serious injuries compared with the previous week.
Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
Of the 28,714 reported deaths, 18,638 cases are attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 7,524 cases to Moderna, and 2,483 cases to Johnson & Johnson.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 3, 2022, for 6-month-olds to 5-year-olds show:
• 1,658 adverse events, including 63 cases rated as serious and 3 reported deaths.
• 4 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation).
• 13 reports of blood clotting disorders.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 3, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:
• 11,133 adverse events, including 292 rated as serious and 5 reported deaths.
• 22 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis.
• 43 reports of blood clotting disorders.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 3, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
• 32,026 adverse events, including 1,834 rated as serious and 44 reported deaths.
• 62 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 97% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
• 655 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis with 643 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
• 166 reports of blood clotting disorders with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 3, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:
• 20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
• 53% of those who died were male, 42% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.
• The average age of death was 73.
• As of June 3, 5,574 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines, including 1,743 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
• Of the 3,615 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 40% to Moderna and 8% to J&J.
• 884 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome, with 42% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 30% to Moderna and 28% to J&J.
• 2,290 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.
• 1,725 reports of myocardial infarction.
• 14,079 reports of blood-clotting disorders in the U.S. Of those, 6,291 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 5,048 reports to Moderna and 2,701 reports to J&J.
• 4,223 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 2,589 cases attributed to Pfizer, 1,434 cases to Moderna and 186 cases to J&J.
• 10 cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with 4 cases attributed Pfizer, 5 cases to Moderna and 1 case to J&J.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...RC_320x180.jpg
https://www.bitchute.com/video/h9HRcU0mNgRC/
Need to Know News (13 June 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
First published at 14:35 UTC on June 14th, 2022.
Jim Fetzer
11293 subscribers
1:38:33 video runtime
NOTE: 40:22 to 1:04:40 - 25 minute report by Joe Olson
Special report from Joe Olson about the demise of the Crimes Against Humanity tour.
on the Crimes Against Humanity tour, where he attended two of the series of speaking events. (Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Dr. Judy Mikovits and Patrick Wood dropped out of the speaker line-up after first May 21 live presentation at The Woodlands, near Houston.)
https://crimesagainsthumanitytour.com/
https://crimesagainsthumanitytour.co...0022-copy.jpeg
Jennifer Bridges
Guest Speaker - Dallas
https://crimesagainsthumanitytour.co...Stillman-1.jpg
Dr. Leland Stillman
Guest Speaker - Tampa
https://crimesagainsthumanitytour.co...irn-copy-2.jpg
Dr. Kevin W. McCairn
Dallas & Tampa (Virtual from Japan)
https://crimesagainsthumanitytour.co...o-Pic-copy.jpg
Thomas Renz
Dallas (Virtual) ˇ Tampa (On-stage)
https://crimesagainsthumanitytour.co...t-copy-2-1.jpg
Steve Kirsch
Sacramento July 16th
https://crimesagainsthumanitytour.co...RM-Fleming.jpg
Dr. Richard M. Fleming
Live on-stage at all CAHT events!
Dr. Fleming appears to be the director of this event. (last of the series will be in Tampa on June 18)
Dr. Richard M. Fleming
Live on-stage at all CAHT events!
As Alan Dershowitz explains, the J6 Committee is so fraudulent and dishonest that they have even resorted to editing Trump's remarks at the Ellipse, where he advised his followers to be "patriot and peaceful" in their protests about the grand theft of the 2020 election, about which we have a superabundance of proof, including (most recently) Denish D'Sosusa's "2000 Mulies", which he has challenged the committee to play and refute. As Dershowitz adds, were a prosecutor to proceed with edited evidence in a court of law, they would be disbarred. But the Democrats have no shame and are willing to subvert the very principles of the Constitution they proclaim to uphold to maintain their illegitimate grip on power. It's disgusting beyond belief. And what a blunder to let Biden on national television with Jimmy Kimmel! He belongs in a long-term care facility, not on TV. Pathetic! Special report from Joe Olson about the demise of the Crimes Against Humanity tour. And we end with a subtle divergence in views between Joe and me about Naomi Wolf.
-
Re: Coronavirus
-
Re: Coronavirus
Are the COVID vaccines safe for kids?
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...ihDtaWNC0A--~D
If you've been wondering, our new video should help answer that question.
Steve Kirsch
25 min ago
Watch our new 2 minute video:
The FDA votes on June 21st to approve the COVID mRNA vaccines for children under 5. Are they safe for my kids?
No, they are not.
We must stop the FDA’s attack, beginning with a campaign to end unethical and unsubstantiated Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) that will subject younger and our most vulnerable children to the unnecessary risks of COVID shots.
Learn more at https://www.VacSafety.org
https://rumble.com/v17wsq0-is-the-co...r-my-kids.html
-
Re: Coronavirus
Dachsie comment:
"It is in the best interest of all parties to have transparency in these issues in order to restore public trust in the medical community and reduce vaccine hesitancy which are key goals of the CDC and FDA."
In order to restore public trust in the medical community it is in the best interest of almost all parties to have transparency in these issues so as to increase vaccine hesitancy which is the bane of the CDC and FDA.
__________
Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trial fraud allegations that should be immediately investigated by the FDA
There are more than a dozen "smoking guns" that indicate that the Pfizer Phase 3 trial was not properly conducted. The FDA should investigate all these allegations, but they aren't. Why not?
Steve Kirsch
21 min ago
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...8_1200x675.png
It is in the best interest of all parties to have transparency in these issues in order to restore public trust in the medical community and reduce vaccine hesitancy which are key goals of the CDC and FDA.
+
"We do have a problem with vaccine uptake that is very serious in the United States and anything we can do to get people more comfortable to be able to accept these potentially life-saving medical products is something that we feel we are compelled to do," said Dr. Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
There are two things Dr. Marks can do to achieve his goal:
1. He can have an open discussion with the people who he alleges are the main spreaders of “misinformation.”
2. He can open an official FDA investigation into allegations of fraud in the Pfizer trial and produce a written report responding to each allegation.
Dr. Marks refuses to do #1. I understand why he won’t: the data isn’t supportive of the government narrative so he’d lose the debate very badly. This is why nobody at the FDA, CDC, or NIH will talk to any of my colleagues.
But #2 is critically important. If there is fraud/ willful misconduct, liability is removed. If the FDA is truly working for the people, these allegations must be investigated.
In order to help facilitate option #2, I personally am aware of over a dozen fraud allegations that I am aware of that should be investigated. This is not a complete list. There are dozens of articles like this one that highlight irregularities in the data that need to be investigated.
My suggestion is that, in addition to the allegations in this article, the FDA should solicit a list of irregularities via an open public process to ensure that all of the key allegations are considered and investigated in order to restore trust in the system. Why would they not want to do that?
Here is only a partial list:
1. Pfizer admitted in a US court proceeding that there was fraud and the FDA knew about it. An admission in a court like this of fraud is surely grounds for an investigation. Watch this 2 minute video where attorney Robert Barnes describes what happened in his federal court case against Pfizer.
2. 13-year old Maddie de Garay developed paralysis less than 24 hours after she was vaccinated. I know Maddie. I know her parents. Today, Maddie is confined to a wheelchair. She was perfectly healthy before she received the vaccine. Less than 24 hours after her second dose, she couldn’t walk off the school bus. Why were her symptoms reported to the FDA in the 12-15 trial results as “functional abdominal pain”? See FDA Buries Data on Seriously Injured Child in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Clinical Trial. I notified acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock on Friday, June 25, 2021 6:21 AM. She promised me the FDA would investigate the fraud. To this day (Jun 14, 2022), the family was never contacted by anyone. I know the FDA is busy, but why has nobody reached out in the year since Commissioner Woodcock promised to investigate? If one child out of 1,000 ends up paralyzed for life, shouldn’t this be something the FDA should be concerned about?
3. There were 5 times as many exclusions in the treatment arm as in the placebo arm of the trial. It is statistically impossible for such an imbalanced number of exclusions to have happened by chance. It appears to be a deliberate culling of patients with adverse events which is not allowed. If it wasn’t a deliberate culling, then how do you explain such large numbers? The amount of the discrepancy is greater than the entire effect size of the trial. This is from page 18 of the December 10, 2020 VRBPAC meeting document:
Image from December 10, 2020 VRBPAC meeting document
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...0c_781x421.png
Why were the allegations of data integrity documented by the BMJ never investigated by the FDA? This is published in a major medical journal yet there was no follow up from the FDA at all. I just talked to Brook Jackson on the phone. She now has 20 lawyers on his whistleblower case. Pfizer was able to get the judge in her case to stay discovery for 6 months so an FDA investigation is the only way to compel discovery. I asked her if anyone at the FDA ever contacted her about her allegations and she said nobody ever called to talk to her. Instead, on the very same day that she emailed the FDA about what happened, she was fired. She emailed the FDA about the issues at 9am on September 25, 2020 and she was fired from her job at Ventavia at 3pm. This suggests that the FDA tipped off Pfizer who notified Ventavia. There was no other way Pfizer could have known: Brook only contacted the FDA. Period. The FDA needs to find out who at that FDA tipped off Pfizer, and then who at Pfizer told Ventavia to fire Brook instead of investigating the allegations. There has to be a chain of custody here. We deserve to know what actions the FDA is going to take against that employee who notified Pfizer. Or to notify the public that this is the proper behavior by FDA employees receiving whistleblower complaints is to take actions to get the whistleblower fired. We need to understand how the leadership of the FDA feels about what happened and whether they intend to get to the bottom of it or simply ignore it.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...15_762x603.png
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...15_762x603.png
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...15_762x603.png
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...15_762x603.png
BMJ article documenting irregularities in the Pfizer trial. The whistleblower was fired 6 hours after notifying the FDA. Someone at the FDA must have leaked the information for Pfizer. If not, was this just coincidence?
5. Why are there more deaths in the trial report than the document Pfizer submitted to the FDA? Shouldn’t they be the same since they are reporting on the same Pfizer study? Here is another article questioning the numbers.
6. There were more deaths in the treatment arm than in the placebo arm. How does the FDA know for certain that the people who died in the treatment arm did not die as a result of the drug? Did they ever look at the data from Pfizer on this? If so, what convinced them the deaths were not related? Can we see the written report which certified this? Pfizer says the deaths were unrelated, but we are never told how they determined this. Were the same tests done as Dr. Walter Lang did (see this video and also this article) and that Dr. Bhakdi and Dr. Burkhardt did? Dr. Peter Schirmacher also discovered that at least 30% to 40% of the deaths shortly after vaccination were likely caused by the vaccine. Schirmacher’s family’s life was then threatened if Schirmacher said anything more publicly. Did Pfizer use the same methodology as Dr. Schirmacher, Bhakdi, Burkhardt, and Lang? Why did Schirmacher, Bhakdi, Burkhart, and Lang all find a huge rate of causality but Pfizer found nothing. They cannot both be right. How will the FDA resolve the discrepancy and assure the public they found the truth?
A report Pfizer filed with the FDA entitled “Summary Basis for Regulatory Action” contains the following statements which are in conflict with data in the VAERS system which is reporting unprecedented increases in adverse events. There are more adverse and serious adverse events reported for the COVID vaccines than for all vaccines combined over the past 32 years. Therefore, the VAERS data and this report simply cannot both be true. The FDA needs to find out which is giving inaccurate data and correct the problem:
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...13_644x457.png
From Summary Basis for Regulatory Action filed with the FDA
8. Mysterious blood clots are only being found in vaccinated cadavers and have never been investigated by the CDC or FDA. Why are these blood clots only happening in vaccinated people if the vaccines are safe and effective? See also this article: EXCLUSIVE: Shocking microscopy photos of blood clots extracted from those who “suddenly died” – crystalline structures, nanowires, chalky particles and fibrous structures. Will someone at the FDA provide public assurances that they have investigated these clots and can explain them?
9. If the vaccines are safe as represented then why does the blood of vaccinated patients look dramatically different under a darkfield microscope?
10. If the vaccines worked as in the trials, how can double-masked, quadruply vaccinated Tony Fauci get COVID?
11. The Pfizer data shows nobody became disabled, yet we had 1.8M people added to the disability system after the vaccines rolled out. If the trial data is correct, how did this happen? The trial was large enough to detect a signal this large, so how could it have gone undetected?
12. The documents released by Pfizer show a large number of discrepancies that are impossible to explain if the trial was executed as stated. Can you investigate all the discrepancies pointed out in articles such as this and this?
13. Brook Jackson’s whistleblower suit against Pfizer has not been dismissed by the court.
14. The story of patient Augusto Roux needs to be thoroughly investigated. Please see Is Subject #12312982 the Key to Proving Pfizer Vaccine Trial Fraud?
15. Why is Sudden Adult Death Syndrome only affecting people who have been vaccinated with the COVID vaccines? Is there a counter-example?
16. Why are athletes dying at 22X the normal rate? And why is this only happening after the vaccines rolled out?
17. Why are there more deaths reported associated with the COVID vaccines in VAERS than for all vaccines combined in the 32 year history of the VAERS system? It isn’t over-reporting because the deaths for all other vaccines for all years is still completely normal as you can see from this chart:
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...a_1225x626.png
Mortality chart from OpenVAERS shows that the death reports are elevated only for the COVID vaccines and not for any other vaccines in the entire history of the VAERS system
18. Shouldn’t the FDA and CDC call for a protective order to prevent retribution by state medical boards against physicians who are reporting adverse events and death following vaccination on social media? Clearly, the CDC and FDA are extremely safety conscious and would want to know about these incidents? So why not make a statement encouraging licensed MDs to speak out?
19. Why are there so few autopsies? And why are the detailed autopsies showing causality ignored? And why is the CDC not warning people about the risk of death?
20. Why is the public not permitted to see the assessments made of over 12,000 US deaths reported in the VAERS system that were determined to be not linked to the COVID vaccines?
21. Nearly 500 articles in the peer-reviewed medical literature have been written about vaccine adverse events from the mRNA vaccines. That isn’t consistent with a vaccine found to have fewer adverse events than the placebo. Someone is lying. Is it hundreds of authors of peer-reviewed papers? Or was the study flawed?
Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Thousands of paid subscribers
I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...7f7df706d1.jpg
FDA Advisors Unanimously Endorse Pfizer, Moderna COVID Shots for Infants and Young Kids, Ignore Pleas to ‘First Do No Harm’
“All the risks are to the innocent children and all of the billion-dollar rewards go to the government-protected pharmaceuticals,” said Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), after advisors to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration today voted 21-0 to recommend Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for infants and young children.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) vaccine advisory panel today unanimously voted 21-0 to recommend Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for infants and young children, stating the totality of the evidence available shows the benefits of the vaccines outweigh the risks of use.
Pfizer’s three-dose vaccine would cover children 6 months to 5 years old, while Moderna’s two-dose vaccine covers children 6 months to 6 years old.
States have already ordered millions of doses made available prior to FDA authorization by the Biden administration.
Depending on whether the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accept the recommendations of their advisory panels, White House officials have said the administration of vaccines for these age groups could start as early as June 21.
The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) ignored pleas from experts, the vaccine injured and a congressman representing 17 other lawmakers to halt authorization until questions about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for the nation’s youngest children could be properly addressed.
Many of the committee members, including pediatrician Dr. Ofer Levy, said the decision to authorize the shots was about providing a choice to parents who wanted access to COVID-19 vaccines, despite concerns by public commenters the panel was not adhering to the requirements for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and that authorization would eventually lead to mandates — as it did with adult vaccines.
“I know that the death rate from COVID and young children may not be extremely high,” said Dr. Jay Portnoy, professor of pediatrics at Children’s Mercy Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri. “It’s absolutely terrifying to parents to have their child be sick.”
Portnoy said there are “so many parents who are absolutely desperate to get this vaccine” and he thinks the committee “owes it to them to give them the choice.”
Several committee members, including Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, raised concerns about Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for kids and the minimal protection it provided after two doses.
Offit said he still supports authorizing a three-dose regimen for the youngest age groups but expects four doses may be needed.
Moderna’s vaccine for infants and toddlers consists of two 25-microgram shots, while Pfizer’s vaccine is a triple-dose regimen of 3-microgram shots each.
Combining all ages together, Pfizer said its three-dose regimen for children 6 months to 5 years old was 80% effective at preventing illness from the Omicron variant based on preliminary data from its clinical trial.
The 80% number was calculated 30 days after the third dose. As noted by committee members, the efficacy number is likely to go down after 30 days and post-approval monitoring was suggested.
Moderna said its two-shot vaccine was about 51% effective against infection from Omicron in children under 2, and about 37% among kids 2 to 5 years old, citing different efficacy numbers than what was reported by the company in March.
In a March 23 press release, Moderna said its vaccine in the 6-month to 2-year age group was only 43.7% effective. In the older age group, the company said its vaccine was 37.5% effective.
A top official at Moderna has already said a booster will be necessary.
All previously authorized COVID-19 vaccines and boosters for all age groups were required to meet the FDA’s 50% requirement prior to obtaining EUA.
But Dr. Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, last month told the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis the agency would not withhold authorization of a pediatric vaccine if it fails to meet the agency’s 50% efficacy threshold for blocking symptomatic infections.
Congressman calls out FDA for failing to answer lawmakers’ questions
During the public hearing portion of the meeting, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) said there are many unanswered questions regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, especially for babies and young children.
“I’m deeply concerned that the push to vaccinate these children is nothing more than a dystopian experiment with unknown consequences,” Gohmert told the committee. “Some of us have outlined these questions in a letter to VRBPAC but have not received any answers, and I pose some of them here.”
Gohmert said:
“Number 1, why has the FDA refused to release the hundreds of thousands of pages of data from preapproval manufacturer studies, post-approval adverse events data and other post-approval manufacturer data?
“Number 2, what is the cardiac risk factor in administrating these COVID vaccines to children?
“Number 3, world-renowned immunologists have raised concerns about potential antibody-dependent enhancement, or ADE, resulting from COVID vaccines, and since ADE was a problem in prior unrelated respiratory vaccine trials, we need to know what studies, if any, the FDA has that it’s used regarding ADE from COVID vaccines in children 5 and under or any age group. Can the FDA affirm there’s no risk of ADE for vaccinated children?
“Number 4, if widely approved among children 5 and under, how many lives, if any, does FDA estimate will be saved next year? Given the injuries reported in the FDA’s VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] system, how will FDA evaluate serious vaccine injuries versus serious COVID outcomes?
“Number 5, is it possible the proposed COVID vaccines in young children could create increased risk in future novel COVID variants?
“Number 6, why has the FDA recently lowered the efficacy bar for COVID vaccines for youngest children? This change significantly lowers the expected benefits from any COVID vaccination for young children and it’s of particular concern given that over 70% of that age cohort already is seropositive.”
Gohmert said these questions and 13 other questions posed by lawmakers are critical and deserve answers from the FDA and VRBPAC prior to any EUA with the “accompanied protection for liability for all harm done.”
Gohmert added:
“In conclusion, some of us have grave concerns that in balancing the risk to rewards here, all the risks are to the innocent children and all of the billion-dollar rewards go to the government-protected pharmaceuticals, leaving me to wonder if Republicans get a majority I may need to have a bill […] to allow civil and criminal liability to vaccine providers and accessories despite an EUA which would force more sensitivity towards vaccine harm to our young children.”
Vaccine-injured speak out
During the public hearing session of the meeting, numerous individuals discussed the injuries they experienced after being vaccinated with Moderna and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines, pleading with officials to look at what’s occurring with the adult population before they authorize vaccines for kids.
Jasmine King, a 38-year-old lawyer whose law license lapsed after she was injured by her first dose of Moderna, said she has been to more than 50 doctor appointments and has spent more than $20,000 in co-pays, treatments and supplements to heal from her injuries.
King said she is being monitored for Lou Gherig’s disease and developed sensory nerve symptoms, motor nerve problems, heart palpitations and autonomic nervous system issues after being vaccinated.
King asked the advisory panel to look at what’s happening in the adult population to see what could happen in the pediatric population — if authorization is given — and consider vaccine injuries when discussing the risks of COVID-19.
Kathlyn Hinesley pointed out that the FDA is legally prohibited from approving any biological product for emergency use unless there’s an emergency that poses a risk of death to the target group, the product is effective in preventing the disease, it is safe and the benefits must outweigh the risk.
Hinesley stated:
“With regard to the first point, children without comorbidities who acquire COVID-19 have a 99.98% survival rate. There is no emergency. Moving forward to effectiveness, a study […] which includes data analysis of 145 countries found that COVID-19 vaccines were in fact associated with a 38% increase in COVID cases and a 31% increase in deaths. Could these vaccines be negatively affecting immunity?
“The number of severe adverse events affecting children ages 5 to 17 reported to VAERS as of June 3 was 8,811, including 114 deaths and 1,346 cases of myocarditis — a condition that can be fatal.
“We can assume if these vaccines are authorized, some babies will die. The benefits of these vaccines are questionable and the risks are clear.”
Hinesley told the committee if they authorized injections for this age group, they would be participating in the killing of children.
Sam Dodson, an intellectual engineer, called out the FDA for doing “nothing” with the “massive safety signals,” colluding with pharmaceutical companies to suppress trial data for 75 years, ignoring fraudulent data, ignoring adverse events like myocarditis and prion diseases and ignoring issues with infertility.
Dodson also expressed concerns about biodistribution data he accused the agency of “doing nothing” about.
“You turned a once-respected agency into a corrupt vessel for the very corporations you swore to protect the American public from,” Dodson said. “If you have one shred of humanity left you will call for an immediate halt to the shots […].”
Before his time ended, Dodson said the panel might want to figure out how they’re “going to diagnose myocarditis in very young babies who can’t talk.”
Dr. Katarina Lindley, a physician and member of the steering committee for the World Council for Health, said data from the CDC from February showed 74.2% of children have already acquired COVID-19 and expressed concerns over Moderna and Pfizer’s data presented to the FDA.
Lindley stated:
“Over 150 studies show that natural immunity is superior. The infection fatality rate under 5 years of age is 0.1 in 100,000 or 1 in a million. The risk of the shot in the already immune is higher than 1 in a million.
“Both Pfizer and Moderna expressly eliminated those that were naturally immune from their study. They did this to avoid the hyperimmune response and possibly death.
“Vaccinating the already immune puts them at risk of having a hyperimmune response. This means you’ll be voting for some children to have a severe adverse reaction and possibly death if you vaccinate the immune. This is bad medicine.”
FDA advisors fail to discuss vaccine imprinting among infants and toddlers
Immune imprinting was not on the agenda at the VRBPAC meeting, nor was it discussed among experts.
However, the authors of an op-ed published this week in STAT, a pharmaceutical industry publication, raised the issue as justification for calling on the FDA panel to reject Pfizer and Moderna’s EUA for young children.
Steve Brozak, founder of the WBB Research Institute, and Dr. Richard Marfuggi, surgeon and medical director of the WBB Research Institute and member of the New Jersey State Biomedical Ethics Committee, wrote:
“The vote on this vaccine for this vulnerable sector of the population is not inexorable. The availability of a therapy is not a justification for its use when benefits of such use are so poorly justified and no data on future consequences for this population to specifically include imprinting even exists.
“The VRBPAC should say ‘no’ to vaccinating infants and toddlers with the Moderna or Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines. ‘First do no harm’ has never been a more important dictum.”
Immune imprinting, or original antigenic sin (OAS), results from exposure to proteins or other biological structures of viruses, like the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, that allow a virus to penetrate host cells and cause infection.
OAS refers to the preference of the immune system to recall existing memory cells — that recall the same pathogen for antibody production — rather than stimulating a new response when encountering a novel but closely related antigen.
According to Brozak and Marfuggi, imprinting can come directly from an acute infection acquired naturally or indirectly through vaccination.
“It can result in reduced — or enhanced — responses to future variants with unknown clinical consequences,” they wrote. “The former is beneficial, the latter is not.”
Immune system imprinting and the negative effects of imprinting are not new concepts. A team of researchers in a 2013 paper described how infants who survived the 1889 Russian pandemic were more likely to experience excess mortality as adults during the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918.
Infants who survived the 1918 Spanish flu were more likely to experience excess mortality as adults during the Hong Kong flu of 1968 and infants exposed to the swine flu pandemic of 1957 were more likely to experience excess mortality as adults during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Mexico.
According to the Doctrine of Original Antigenic Sin by Dr. Thomas Francis, the initial priming of the immune system (initial exposure to the virus, either in the wild or via a vaccine) gets “fixed” for life.
If the initial priming of the immune system is sub-optimal and biased, then that sub-optimal initial priming can effectively derange and bias the immune response long-term, which would guide all future immunological responses, said Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, a global expert on COVID-19.
According to Brozak and Marfuggi, the immune systems of infants and toddlers — the latest targets of COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and health agencies — are immature and developing.
They wrote:
“If an immature immune system is immunologically imprinted, either by acute infection from the currently circulating viral variant or by a COVID-19 vaccine based on the original, wild-type variant that is no longer in circulation, it may fail to develop appropriate defenses when confronted — even years later — by a Covid variant or another totally different pathogen.”
According to Alexander, “The COVID-19 vaccines being administered in the U.S. only reduce symptoms, thus allowing the host to stay alive (an evolutionary future it did not have) while remaining capable of transmitting. Evidence shows vaccinated persons are indeed susceptible to infection, and as alarmingly, carry as high a viral load as the unvaccinated.”
In addition, vaccinated persons are likely to spread the virus to other members of their household, Alexander said.
“Imperfect, leaky and harmful COVID-19 vaccines could rob children of robust, durable and potent natural innate immunity that has always protected them and helps reduce the infectious pressure while contributing to population herd immunity.”
Some vaccines could drive the evolution of more virulent pathogens, and “Marek’s disease effect and vaccination may well be at play here with COVID vaccines — moderating symptoms while not stopping infection or transmission, thus posing a danger to the unvaccinated and vaccinated,” Alexander added.
As The Defender reported Tuesday, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense chairman and chief legal counsel, sent a letter to VRBPAC members last week warning that the organization is poised to take legal action should the EUAs be granted.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DQ1qoUZciaIc/
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...Ic_320x180.jpg
1:11:08 video runtime
Dr. Christiane Northrup | The Reality of Today's Brave New World
First published at 19:44 UTC on June 15th, 2022.
First published at 19:44 UTC on June 15th, 2022.
FABULOUS STUFF here from Dr. Christiane Northrup!!! Especially strong on the issues of fertility, miscarriages, child-raising, healthy sexuality, effects of being around vaxxed people and how to avoid the demonic propaganda that’s flooding our western, Christian-based culture.
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-ch...OghMjEgFr.html
Original source of this video: https://live.childrenshealthde....fense.org/shows/tea
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...d-the-vaccine/
The Babies and The Vaccine
Protecting your baby from a virus that doesn’t exist, with a killshot
by Jon Rappoport
June 16, 2022
So you’ve had your eight-month-old baby injected with the COVID vaccine.
Of course.
And the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist.
I’ve heard that. But it’s not the issue for us.
What is the issue for you?
Making a fashion statement.
How so?
We need to stay in the forefront of trends.
Why?
Why wouldn’t we?
Have you seen the federal database that records vaccine injury and death reports?
Of course.
So you know your baby could die from the shot.
Yes.
And that doesn’t matter to you.
Not as much as being able to tell our friends we had our baby vaccinated.
You, as parents—
That’s a misunderstood term. We don’t consider ourselves parents. The State is the parent. We’re the monitors.
Monitors?
We observe, and carry out limited functions.
Even if you assume the virus exists, the chances of your baby catching it and becoming ill are incredibly tiny.
That’s right. But this isn’t what we’re about. As I said, we’re keeping pace with fashion.
Are you human?
It depends on how you define the term. Humans are biological machines. Most people believe in something beyond that, but the content of belief is predetermined by a person’s upbringing, genes, conditioning, and so on.
Have you ever questioned vaccine science?
There’s nothing to question. We understand science. I have a PhD in psychology, and my husband is a software engineer. My IQ is 141. My husband’s is 136. We’re equipped to deal with vaccine issues.
If your baby died from the shot, would you mourn?
Yes. We would post photos and statements on our Facebook page.
—No doubt, some people would take offense at this “interview.” How could I?
Here’s how. I wrote it. I wrote it because the government and Pfizer and Moderna—no matter how they interpret COVID and “the virus”—are moving ahead to inject as many babies as possible—which is a crime of mass assault and mass murder. Many parents will go along with it.
-
Re: Coronavirus
Dachsie comment:
Novavax - Another CRAP-SHOOT SHOT
_______________________
https://image.cnbcfm.com/api/v1/imag...=354&ffmt=webp
Understand that that this latest mystery injection does not have FDA Emergency Use Authorization EUA yet.
"https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/09/fda-decision-on-novavaxs-covid-shots-could-be-delayed-.html"
FDA decision on Novavax’s Covid shots could be delayed to review changes in manufacturing
Published Thu, Jun 9 2022 7:00 AM EDTUpdated Thu, Jun 9 20222:57 PM EDT
thumbnail
Spencer Kimball
@spencekimball
______________________________________
You will find a nice article and a link to Dr. Peter McCullough's free audio 6-16-22 podcast.
HERE
https://www.americaoutloud.com/novav...ke-and-q-a-27/
"Novavax Approval, CDC Trust, Vaccine Uptake and Q & A 27
by Dr. Peter McCullough | Jun 16, 2022 | Health, Politics"
