-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
SPLC Hate Center Attacks Trump Supporter, Roger Stone for going to bat for Bundys.
The longtime political strategist, whose illustrious career spans more than four decades may have chosen his newest cause —defending the Bundy family, — to return him to the public eye. Curiously, after all his years in government, this meant aligning himself with men charged with conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States.
Stone’s newest cause célèbre involves Cliven, Ammon and Ryan Bundy who in 2014 famously initiated an armed standoff against the Bureau of Land Management at their Nevada ranch when the agency came to collect overdue grazing fees incurred by the family’s patriarch Cliven Bundy. In 2016, Ammon Bundy perpetrated another standoff when he and his supporters occupied the Malheur Federal Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. Ammon was acquitted for his part in Malheur, but he, Ryan and Cliven are currently facing trial for their roles in the Nevada.
Stone made his support for the Bundys and their followers public when he spoke at a Las Vegas fundraiser on July 15. After stepping up to the stage, his first words, partially drowned out by attendee applause, were, “I am here for one reason: I stand in solidarity with every member of the Bundy Family … ”
He went on to call the FBI agents involved in ending the Malheur occupation “Federal mercenaries,” claiming Lavoy Finicum otherwise known as “Tarpman” — was murdered in cold blood, which brought “death and dishonor to our country.”
According to Stone, the government’s prosecution of the Bundys is the “oppressive hand of a military jack-booted government that has lost all sense of reality, of law, morality or the U.S. constitution.” Further, he denounces Gloria Navarro, the Nevada judge presiding over the “Battle of Bunkerville” trial as “outrageous,” “unconstitutional” and a “disgrace” to the judiciary.
These sentiments are in line with many of the Bundys’ supporters who have disparaged the judge’s reputation and made a number of veiled threats against her, which Stone’s words are more likely to validate than prevent.
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/defa...st_partial.png
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/defa...right_pic2.png
Stone has a plan for getting the Bundys released, which involves his friend and former client, Donald J. Trump. The president, says Stone, needs to “pardon every member of the Bundy family.” Stone is pushing a presidential pardon through a petition created on the Infowars website, which is run by another friend of his, rabid conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.
Stone has also been a frequent guest on a radio network owned by Sam Bushman who has openly supported the Bundys, as has James Edwards, the white nationalist who hosts the show Political Cesspool, which plays on Bushman’s network. They are part of a group called the Freedom Coalition, which includes Judge Andrew Napolitano, who Stone has credited with sending him information on the Bundy’s case.
Up until now, Stone has been known for lobbying and cutthroat political tactics he’s been employing since the days when he worked in the Nixon White House. Richard Nixon, according to Stone’s mother, was like a god to her son, and Stone has a tattoo of Nixon’s face on his back.
Stone bragged in Get Me Roger Stone, a documentary, about his controversial career, that he lives “a pretty Machiavellian life.” He is known within political circles as a brazen rabble rouser who has been “everywhere dark and ugly in our politics” and “peddles garbage conspiracy theories” according to Harry Siegel of the New York Daily News.
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/stone.png
Stone, who crafted a political rule for himself and others that “Hate is a stronger motivator than love,” has interviewed with the anti-Semitic weekly American Free Press, dedicated one of his books to holocaust denier Victor Thorn and used a number of race-based attacks, calling people “stupid Negro,” “House Negro,” Nigga,” “Uncle Tom,” “Arrogant Know-It-All Negro” and more.”
With his show of support for the Bundys, he is attacking the government on behalf of people accused of conspiring against it, while once again making a name for himself on the national stage. As Stone himself put it, “the only thing I can think of that’s worse than being talked about, is not being talked about.”
Photo credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Dr. Angus McIntosh, well educated in western land use explains the Bundy court orders re Public Lands
Also the Supreme Court ruled in Barden v Northern Pacific RR that once rights were granted on the public lands they are no longer public. The case has not been overturned in over 130 years
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...24&oe=59FB99DD
Angus McIntosh18 hrs
Prosecutors say Dan Love and his accomplices were carrying out a Court order to seize Bundy cattle from "public land". However the cattle that the Love gang were rustling were not on "public land". They were on Bundy's "allotment" which together with his Homestead comprised a farm or ranch "unit".
If the cattle weren't on "public land" then the Love Gang were not acting under the court order and could not have been acting in the "lawful performance of their duty".
You can only interfere with, or impede a federal employee if they are acting lawfully.
The reason Bundy's aren't charged with trespassing is because their cattle weren't on "public land", they were on their "allotment".
The Love Gang was not carrying out the Court Order because they were attempting to enforce it on land owned in a split estate by Bundys, not on "public land".
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Bundy Ranch jury instructions from the Supreme Court
http://s19.postimg.org/x5w71zx9f/IMG_2084.jpg
And the Supreme Law for the cheif persecutor
https://s19.postimg.org/hvwbut1r7/IMG_2083.jpg
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
The 'M' Word. . .
3 Percenters Demonized in Federal Court
THESE EVENTS WERE ABOUT GOOD CITIZENS COMING TO THE AID OF THEIR NEIGHBORS
August 2, 2017 BLM, Constitution, Featured, Idaho 5
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u.../3-650x381.jpg
3 Percenters Demonized in Federal Court
by Shari Dovale
Though the defendants are actually Eric Parker, Scott Drexlar, Steven Stewart and Ricky Lovelein, the prosecution has made their association the the group “Idaho 3%” a material part of the case against them. It is enough to believe the government is trying to prosecute the group, as well as the individuals.
3 Percenters
The Three Percenters (also styled “3%ers”) is an American patriot movement which pledges resistance against the United States government regarding any restriction of the United States Constitution. Their primary purpose is to protect constitutional rights and characterized as being ideologically similar to the Oath Keepers.
The group’s name is based on the that the historical American Revolution military’s armed resistance against the British, in the American Revolution, constituted three percent of the population. This number has never been accurately calculated, and estimates vary depending on whether or not slaves are included in the colonial population numbers and women are counted as potential combatants. Wikipedia
The prosecution has claimed that the defendants conspired against the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and, by extension, the US Federal Government. The government has not shown much success with this charge against these defendants.
The previous trial showed the jury in favor of acquittal.
The government needs this charge validated to fully demonize anyone that challenges them on their policies that contradict the US Constitution.
The prosecution is claiming the conspiracy was continued with their association the the Idaho 3% group, between training and recruitment. They also claim a further conspiracy against the federal government by the Idaho 3% involvement in other “operations”, such as “Operation Gold Rush” in Oregon and “Operation Big Sky” in Montana.
These events were about good citizens coming to the aid of their neighbors for support against the land grab of the alphabet agencies within the federal government. However, it should be noted that these events did not take place until months, or years, after the Bunkerville Standoff in April 2014.
Bunkerville was over. These are events “After the Fact” and do not, by themselves, show a state of mind for a time that long in the past.
Judge Gloria Navarro has allowed these events to be brought in as evidence against these defendants over the objections of the defense.
The Idaho 3% was not formed until after the events in Bunkerville. The government seems to want you to believe otherwise. They would like you to believe that anyone in a group like this is a dissident. They would like the public to call them ‘Anti-government’ and lawless. This is simply not true.
Entered into evidence, and played for the jury, is the overview of the Idaho 3%
3
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker, End of Day Update Aug. 7 ~ J Grady
http://youtu.be/WbMh0r6EAJc
https://youtu.be/WbMh0r6EAJc
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
John Lamb, Mid-Day Report Bundy Retrial Aug. 8 ~J Grady
http://youtu.be/-AQzWzihVHc
https://youtu.be/-AQzWzihVHc
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker, The Defense is Denied its Witnesses ~ J Grady
http://youtu.be/fwAVFB-xt1M
https://youtu.be/fwAVFB-xt1M
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker writes about the phone call from her husband last night
https://scontent.fbog2-2.fna.fbcdn.n...dd&oe=5A2BFAA1
Andrea Olson-Parker
7 hrs ·
Tonight when the phone rang from Henderson it was so hard to answer it. I knew he was feeling beat up. I was too. He needed me to be strong for him and I can do that one more time.
He was defeted when I answered. He said "I was so worried about helping my neighbors that I did a huge injustice to my kids." I told him by doing this. By suffering this long hard path you are doing more for your children than you could have ever done. Not just your children but every child.
Today was a hard day tomorrow will be worse. To have to sit and listen to testimony that the jury will not be able to hear that it could exonerate all of these guys. It must still be harder for them so we must push on.
Eric and Scott were talking after the first mistrial. They said to each other " If we have to keep doing this over and over than so be it. It just means we will awaken more people and our change will be more significant."
Today they pulled them out very early for transport. Earlier than normal which is already pretty early.
The rest of the pod had a prayer circle for the jury as soon as they were let out of their cells. They prayed the jury would see what the government doesn't want them to. They would find a way to the truth.
They are changing minds and hearts all over. They are changing the minds and hearts of some marshals, police, guards, inmates and anyone who stumbles upon this trial.
It is a high price but one that is necessary for the survival of our constitutional republic.
We will have the strength to fight again tomorrow.
121 Likes88 Comments158 Shares
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
A video here that was posted on youtube yesterday of an interview with Ammon Bundy. It's a pretty good interview with footage from the confrontation between the patriotic americans and the communist government that has taken over our country.
Ammon speaks until about 20:00 in to the video and then they lose him. The interviewer says he's lost his phone privileges again. In the background they show some pretty good video that was taken the day of the confrontation at the wash.
Starting at about 20:00 in they play Cliven saying they are going to stop traffic and move the cattle back to where they belong. I think the government is trying to make a big deal of that but I've trailed cattle up and down hi ways off an on all my life and it's common practice where I live. It's also common to stop traffic when you are crossing a hi way with cattle from one side to the other.
The interviewer takes a swipe at NS Germany at one point and I don't like that but the rest is pretty good.
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker - Today a mock trial begins ~ J Grady
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
John Lamb Aug. 9 From the Federal Court Building in Las Vegas ~ Witnesses denied
http://youtu.be/M4dFe3CsoR4
https://youtu.be/M4dFe3CsoR4
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
This is an hour long video with Ammon Bundy calling from the jail in Pahrump dated Aug 5. I think it is part 1 of the video Tumblweed posted
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Is The Persecutor's Case Collapsing?
Is the Prosecution Case Collapsing?
NAVARRO IS MAKING EVERY ATTEMPT TO SHUT DOWN THE DEFENSE BEFORE THEY START.
August 8, 2017 BLM, Constitution, Featured 5
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...se-600x381.jpg
Is the Prosecution Case Collapsing?
by Shari Dovale
The Bunkerville retrial in Las Vegas has several interesting updates today.
The prosecution has stated that they have finished presenting their witnesses, however they will not formally rest their case until the next time they see the jury, which is expected at 9am Thursday morning.
The jury questions for the final witness, Special Agent Willis, were very interesting and seemed to show that the jurors are getting a bit annoyed at the behavior of the judge.
Some examples of the jury questions include a juror wanting to know why the FBI was involved in this case at all, since it was a BLM operation. Judge Navarro refused to ask that question in open court and told the jury that it was not relevant for them to know the answer.
Another question referred to whether or not defendants Drexlar and Stewart had had any direct communications with anyone (outside of the current defendants) prior to April 12, 2014.
AUSA Myhre was at a loss when he heard of this question, knowing that he should object but not quite sure how to do it for the jury. After dancing around the answer, it was a clear “No”.
The reason that the jury has been given the day off is that Judge Gloria Navarro wants the defense to ‘proffer’ their witnesses first to her so that she may rule whether or not their testimony is relevant. Navarro wants to know what they have to say, so she can decide if the jury will be allowed to hear the testimony.
Navarro is making every attempt to shut down the defense before they start. This includes the testimony of Dennis Michael Lynch, former FOX News reporter. Lynch was called by the prosecution in the first trial this past spring, though the testimony did not go quite as well as they had hoped.
Lynch had video, as well as personal testimony, that showed the excessive force by the BLM to the protesters. The prosecution has made the decision not to call him during this trial, as expected, so the defense has called him. Navarro seems to be trying to find a way to keep him from testifying.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...bar-300x29.jpg
Rich Tanasi, attorney for Steven Stewart, wants to put witnesses from the wash up to testify. The prosecution has objected, though the defense argument is that the government has brought into question the mood of the crowd. This point was made several times.
During the arguments, the prosecution made the statement that they had never alleged conspiracy of the 410 people in the wash. However, they forgot the fact that they have been threatening everyone as “Unindicted Co-conspirators”.
They have made the claims during this trial, as well as the previous trial. They used these threats to keep witnesses from testifying. These claims were made outside the presence of the jury.
This goes to show that the prosecution wants to eat their cake and have it too. They use the claim that everyone is an “Unindicted Co-conspirator” to get around heresay objections.
We know that Judge Navarro will grant their motions, effectively shutting down the defense.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...bar-300x29.jpg
Another way that Judge Navarro seems to be going out of her way to help the prosecution is through her insistence that the defense can file a 29A motion early.
Rule 29. Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal
(a) Before Submission to the Jury. After the government closes its evidence or after the close of all the evidence, the court on the defendant’s motion must enter a judgment of acquittal of any offense for which the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. The court may on its own consider whether the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. If the court denies a motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s evidence, the defendant may offer evidence without having reserved the right to do so.
Judge Gloria Navarro made every attempt to get the defense to file a “29A” motion today.
A 29A motion is a motion to acquit the defendants on the basis of insufficient evidence. The charges each have several elements, and all elements must be proven before the charge can be sustained.
For example:
COUNT ONE
Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the United States
(Title 18, United States Code, Section 371)
a. Assault on a Federal Officer, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section l ll(a)(l) and (b);
b. Threatening a Federal Law Enforcement Officer, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section l 15(a)(l)(B);
c. Use and Carry of a Firearm In Relation to a Crime of Violence,
in violation of Title 181 United States Code. Section 924(c);
d. Obstruction of the Due Administration of Justice, in violation
of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1503;
e. Interference with Interstate Commerce by Extortion, in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1951; and
f. Interstate Travel in Aid of Extortion, in violation of Title 18,
United States Code, Section 1952
Under (b) it states: Threatening a Federal Law Enforcement Officer. It can be argued that the government did not prove this element as they have multiple videos, Facebook posts, etc that show the defendants desired a non violent resolution. They did not want the altercation with the BLM or FBI.
The government might attempt to argue that the threat was implied. However, it will be up to the defense to argue the point.
The problem with Judge Navarro trying to make the defense file and argue the 29A motion is that the government has not rested it’s case yet. They do not intend to rest it’s case before the jury returns on Thursday.
If the defense files their motion prior to the government resting their case, then they will be giving the prosecution carte blanche to continue presenting evidence against their clients. The prosecution will know every point that the defense can make against them, therefore it will be malpractice for the defense attorneys to file this motion too soon.
But Judge Gloria Navarro is still showing her bias. It is not inconceivable that she will bully the defense in to filing this motion prior to the prosecution completing their case.
She has to see that the government’s case has taken a severe turn towards the South. That could be why she has doubled down against the defense.
Please pay attention to this travesty of justice. This case is a very important case, not just for the other defendants waiting for their turn in court, but to the citizens of this country. Every citizen of this country will be effected by the outcome of this trial.
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Eric Parker's view through the jersey barrier. The govt. witnesses said they could see him aiming his rifle at them.
The Oath shared a post.
23 hrs ·
#bundyjury. When the prosecution can sense they are losing, they look for a fall guy. When the trial first started, it looked like they were going after Ricky Lovelien. As it is wrapping up, they seem to be making sure Eric is the one. I pray one of the jury members actually gets in their car and drives out to the bridge. I pray they look and see it is not parallel. I pray they see that have been deceived. This jury CANNOT believe they have to find at least one guilty, as if they "owe" the government. These men and their attorneys have not been allowed to present a defense. It may take awhile, but Gloria Navarro will ultimately see the cost of her throwing this case. Teresa
https://scontent.fbog1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...c3&oe=5A368B58
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker does a great job reporting the daily events at these trials despite the burden she is forced to carry.
She posted this message to her supporters
https://scontent.fbog1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...8e&oe=5A35CBA7
Bundy Ranch shared a post.
8 hrs ·
https://scontent.fbog1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...3f&oe=5A3615A5Andrea Olson-Parker8 hrs ·
The last few days I have been in a bad place. Today I figured it out. They are fighting us so hard because we are doing the right thing.
I am sorry I failed you all today.
I promise tomorrow I will pick back up and we will move forward.
I will not let them get me down. They are doing it to silence the truth.
I am so glad for you all because you are what keeps me going.
110 Likes19 Comments
Top Comments
Diana Steward, Wilma Jones, Benz Ross and 107 others like this.
Comments
https://scontent.fbog1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...11&oe=59EBC9B4
John Lee You are fighting a multi-million army of trained chimpanzees. Your opponents are clothed, fed and housed by the criminals of congress who are responsible for this american style Holocost. Rape , Pilate and plunder of the American citizens by the army of chimps who live for the rewards handed out by congress. Be kind to the servants of the criminal class and give them a banana!! Most of the servants to uncle sugar are numb from the neck up.
9 · 7 hrs
https://scontent.fbog1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...b3&oe=5A2AF5B5
Martha Calloway What ever you are feeling is ok...we humans can't always stand strong against such tyranny...at least not without the strength that the Lord our God gives us to carry on in the face of it all. His love and power holds us up and carries us through. All of the patriots who stood at Bunkerville and their families are in my thoughts and prayers every day. May God keep giving each of you strength to carry on and open the eyes and hearts of millions of other Americans who don't know what is happening.
8 · 8 hrs
View 17 more comments
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
There is a lot more corruption in the court today. Several videos have been posted. I will try to post them in the order things have occurred
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Eric Parker Ripped Off Witness Stand
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Wow! The Las Vegas Review-Journal actually printed a small but truthful article on the injustice in Gloria Navarro's court room. Undoubtedly her ancestors migrated to the USA to ger out from under Castro's communism and she has reverted back to what they fled Cuba to avoid.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinio...ille-standoff/
Deck stacked against defendants on trial for role in Bundy Bunkerville standoff
Marilyn Lee North Las Vegas
August 12, 2017 - 9:00 pm
I am convinced U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro is a rogue judge working to achieve a desired outcome
[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.65098)]https://www.reviewjournal.com/wp-con..._judge_web.jpg[/COLOR]
As I read the article by David Ferrara regarding the Bunkerville trial, I am convinced U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro is a rogue judge working to achieve a desired outcome (“Four defense witnesses testify in standoff trial,” Wednesday Review-Journal).
Judge Navarro inserted her bias into the processes by actually choosing several of the jurors herself. She has also prohibited the defendants from exercising their constitutional rights by ordering defense attorneys not to reference the First Amendment’s right to freely assemble and the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms. In addition, she has limited the ability of the defendants to tell their side of the events concerning the misconduct and excessive force by law enforcement officers and mercenaries who were brought in by government officials.
Now, Judge Navarro “allows” defense witnesses to proffer their statements only outside the presence of jurors.
Judge Navarro has set such limited perimeters regarding what the defense can use to tell its side of this story that it becomes obvious to even the casual observer — and, I hope, to the jurors — that this judge is not interested in justice.
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker Afternoon Update (Feed cut short) ~ J Grady
http://youtu.be/JB9CKK15bRA
https://youtu.be/JB9CKK15bRA
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
J Grady put up this video "Through The Looking Glass ~ Jade Helm Presentation Synchronized With Burns, Oregon. How far would the government go to force the Bundy's off their land?
Tumbleweed has pointed out on various occassions our goverment is using the same tactics used against Ukraine. I have always felt the Malhuer Protest in Burns was a trap set up by the feds.
http://youtu.be/qMTB0XcoYQ4
Through the Looking Glass ~ Jade Helm Presentation Synchronized with Burns, Oregon
J Grady 57 views
https://yt3.ggpht.com/-xB-1eH_M5GM/A...ffff/photo.jpg
SUBSCRIBE
3.1K
1
0
Published on Aug 14, 2017 This presentation really just baffled me when i first heard about it in 2015. I thought it was just unheard of to have something at this scale done on our lands. I came across this again a few months ago and VFN and myself had the majority of Through the Looking Glass episodes https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... and had all the research that had pointed to this.
Luckily i have a great team mate that already had all the footage and the clips we needed. Ask yourselves after hearing all the court updates, Just how far would he Federal Government go to make sure the Bundys are locked up?? Would they set up a full blown psyop to get the Bundys off their land and perhaps try to collect data on other Real Patriots in the process of making a case against them??
Jade Helm Presentation to Big Spring Texas City Council https://youtu.be/dLM4-aImMkY
Jade Helm Texas eerily sounds like Burns Oregon (10 Minutes) https://youtu.be/BAJTHcc1dNI
Copyright Disclaimer:Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Ode to the Bundy Trials
The Oath shared a post.
August 12 at 6:17pm ·
Paula Hart has talent. Teresa
https://scontent.fbog1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...cf&oe=59F2957DPaula HartAugust 12 at 6:05pm ·
After flying in on her trusty ol' broom
Navarro enters her federal courtroom
Where she sits on her arse
And oversees a farce
While donned in her black-robed costume
Completely corrupt to her very core
Impartiality went out the door
Prosecutors have their way
While the defense gets no say
Any pretense of justice is no more
The government's low-down,dirty-dealing
Has left jury and witnesses reeling
For their goal to acheive
They must lie and deceive
And all without one guilty feeling
Though innocent men's lives are at stake
To Feds, no difference does it make
It's all about the win
Covering up their own sin
Which is why their narrative is fake
Can't talk about what was done to our men
Even about the First Amendment pen
Or the snipers on the hill
That were all primed to kill
We can't talk about where, why or when.
Yet, agents on the stand said they were in fear
Some even managed to work up a tear
Oh, the lies that they told
So straight-faced and bold
It was, by far, the best show seen all year!
- By Paula Hart
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
monty
J Grady put up this video "Through The Looking Glass ~ Jade Helm Presentation Synchronized With Burns, Oregon. How far would the government go to force the Bundy's off their land?
Tumbleweed has pointed out on various occassions our goverment is using the same tactics used against Ukraine. I have always felt the Malhuer Protest in Burns was a trap set up by the feds.
http://youtu.be/qMTB0XcoYQ4
Through the Looking Glass ~ Jade Helm Presentation Synchronized with Burns, Oregon
J Grady 57 views
https://yt3.ggpht.com/-xB-1eH_M5GM/A...ffff/photo.jpg
SUBSCRIBE
3.1K
1
0
Published on Aug 14, 2017 This presentation really just baffled me when i first heard about it in 2015. I thought it was just unheard of to have something at this scale done on our lands. I came across this again a few months ago and VFN and myself had the majority of Through the Looking Glass episodes https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list... and had all the research that had pointed to this.
Luckily i have a great team mate that already had all the footage and the clips we needed. Ask yourselves after hearing all the court updates, Just how far would he Federal Government go to make sure the Bundys are locked up?? Would they set up a full blown psyop to get the Bundys off their land and perhaps try to collect data on other Real Patriots in the process of making a case against them??
Jade Helm Presentation to Big Spring Texas City Council https://youtu.be/dLM4-aImMkY
Jade Helm Texas eerily sounds like Burns Oregon (10 Minutes) https://youtu.be/BAJTHcc1dNI
Copyright Disclaimer:Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
I believe Jade helm was training and practice for the communists who are planning on taking over this nation. They've been buying off the politicians, military and law enforcement.
They are training to fight and destroy any and all of the american people who will resist a communist take over. That's what they did in Russia and Ukraine (they demonized the farmers in Ukraine by calling them Kulaks to justify taking all their property). At the moment the american people have the power to stop them if they weren't all so brainwashed and naive. The people in Ukraine were mostly unarmed when the communists took over but the americans are pretty well armed I believe.
The Malhuer trial was about setting precedent to demonize anyone who resists the government taking of property away from the people and calling them terrorists. That's what the Bundy trial in Las Vegas is about too, labeling patriotic american people as terrorists so they can destroy them and their families with no consequences. They also want to make sure no one ever resists law enforcement or corrupt government in any way and if they do they want them to know their lives will be destroyed.
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
John Lamb and Andrea Olson-Parker Update 8/15 ~ J Grady
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker, Closing Arguments 8/15 J Grady
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Alert: Defendants have waived their closing arguments, jury has the case
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
What happens at appeal if the defence didn't rest and the case has gone to the jury?
Defense Does NOT Rest – Jury Deliberates
THE GENERAL CONSENSUS OUTSIDE THE COURTHOUSE IS “WE PUSHED THE FEDS BACK ONCE AGAIN!”
August 15, 2017 BLM, Constitution, Featured 2
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...om-678x381.jpg
Defense Does NOT Rest – Jury Deliberates
by Shari Dovale
The Bunkerville Retrial has gone to the jury to begin their deliberations.
The defense case has been wrought with drama. Judge Gloria Navarro began by forcing the defense witnesses to proffer, or preview, their testimony out of the jury’s hearing. After 4 witnesses testified via SKYPE last week, including a witness that previously was called by the prosecution, Navarro ruled that none of them could testify.
Navarro made the ruling based on her belief that the witnesses were only there to bolster a self-defense claim. She ruled previously that this was not a valid defense in this case.
The following day, Eric Parker attempted to testify in his own defense, as is his right to do. After a few questions, Navarro stopped him from testifying, had him removed from the witness stand, and had his testimony completely stricken from the official court record. She instructed the jury to disregard his testimony, as if he had never been on the witness stand.
Monday brought Scott Drexler to the stand, however, she severely limited him in what he was allowed to say while testifying. He was not allowed to tell the jury why he went to Nevada, nor testify to any of the Constitutional violations that he witnessed.
The jury attempted to question Drexler after his testimony, yet Judge Navarro shut them down as well when she only allowed 4 of 12 questions to be asked. She told the jury that their remaining questions were not relevant and they did not need those answers.
Tuesday began the closing arguments. Nadia Ahmed gave the closing arguments for the prosecution. Some of the highlights from her closing included calling the Bundy cattle “property of the BLM” yet later stating the defendants went to Bunkerville to aid Cliven Bundy in “getting hiscattle back”.
Ahmed also accused the defendants of using “travelers to impede officers from eliminating themas a threat.” Well, okay, the defendants did not want to be eliminated, or killed, by the BLM snipers. But the prosecution would have you believe that is the crime.
You are not allowed to defend yourself against BLM snipers?
Several times the defense objected to statements that Ahmed made, and each time Judge Navarro would rule in the favor of the prosecution.
When it came time for the defense to begin their closing arguments, each of the four defense attorneys stood and made the statement, “On behalf of Mr. [Client], we have no closing argument.”
Judge Gloria Navarro never asked the defense to rest their case, and seems to have forgotten the necessity for them to do so. They each sat down and Navarro immediately gave the case to the jury and excused them to begin their deliberations. Now, we have speculation as to the legal issues this brings.
Rich Tanasi, attorney for Steven Stewart, stood after the jury left and requested to make a motion before the official recess, yet Navarro would not allow it. She told him that he needed to file it in writing.
The drama did not end there. It seems that one of the jurors caught the eye of several people, including AUSA Myhre. She was seen ‘blowing a kiss’. She was later brought in front of Judge Navarro, as well as the prosecution and defense attorneys, for questioning.
She claimed that she was blowing a kiss to the alternate jurors, and not any of the participants in the trial. Navarro has allowed her to remain on the jury for the time being.
Speculation is running rampant about the strategy the defense is using by not giving closing arguments. Most believe it was a form of mass protest against Judge Navarro, knowing they would never have gotten through the closings without multiple objections.
Whether or not the jury will understand the protest is yet to be seen. It does seem to resonate throughout the spectators that it was a powerful statement.
The general consensus outside the courthouse is “We pushed the Feds back once again!”
Ahmed included the first half of this video in her closing arguments as evidence against the defendants:
Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews
Share this:
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dachsie
Hardly qualified communistic and made Chief Judge
https://ballotpedia.org/Gloria_M._Navarro
Quote:
district of nevada
navarro was nominated by president obama for a seat on the united states district court for the district of nevada vacated by brian sandoval.[6][7][8]
the american bar association gave her the ratings "substantial majority qualified" and "minority not qualified". Senator harry reid, who recommended her to obama for nomination, said the aba should "get a new life" in it's ratings. He claimed that the association's system places too much emphasis on judicial experience and not enough on "real world" experience.[9]
senate judiciary committee hearing
navarro's public questionnaire available herequestions for the record available herenavarro was scheduled to a hearing before the senate judiciary committee on february 11, 2010. When questioned about her lack of prior judicial experience, navarro replied that her practice as a litigator in state and federal courts has prepared her: {{quote|the experiences have given me the opportunity to appear before many different judges with many different styles. I have also had the opportunity to become familiar with many different rules and procedures in different courts. Having that broad range of experience definitely will build a solid foundation for a successful judicial career.[9] the committee voted to forward her nomination to the full senate on march 4, 2010[10] ]] the senate confirmed her 98 - 0 to the court on may 5, 2010.[11][12]
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Nevada is controlled by Harry Reid and his bevy of latino/a politicians, US Senator Cathrine Cortez-Masto, Mexican born Congressman Ruben Kihuen, Governor Bryan Sandoval and the incompetent corrupt Chief Judge Gloria Navarro
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Brand Thornton, "Did anyone get the license number of that truck?" Brand says the judge and prosecution got to cocky and overplayed their hand. ~ Lo Khttp://youtu.be/E0NMMeT6uR4
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
Andrea Olson-Parker is doing her own personal protest waiting for the jury verdict ~J Grady
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d89MLM3VVbM
REALIST NEWS - WTF! Bundy Ranch Case: Judge issues list of things defendants can’t say
jsnip4
jsnip4
48K
3,020 views
Published on Aug 17, 2017
Articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_...
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/14...
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/1...ase-in-nevada/
Bundy ranch case: Judge issues list of things defendants can’t say
http://www.mercurynews.com/wp-conten...-nev.jpg?w=882
By The Associated Press |
PUBLISHED: August 14, 2017 at 3:30 pm | UPDATED: August 15, 2017 at 7:00 am
http://content.newsinc.com/jpg/1391/...g?t=1501102140
LAS VEGAS — Restrictions placed by a federal judge on what defendants can say about being at Cliven Bundy’s ranch in April 2014 are leading to tense moments in the Las Vegas retrial of four men accused of wielding assault-style weapons to stop federal agents from rounding up cattle belonging to the anti-government figure.
Chief U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro refused Monday to order a mistrial sought by the defense attorney for Eric Parker. Navarro had ordered Parker off the witness stand last week and told the jury to disregard his testimony.
Such a dramatic step involving a defendant in the presence of a jury is unusual and might draw scrutiny from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, said Robert Draskovich, a Las Vegas lawyer who said he had never heard of such a move in more than two decades practicing in federal courts. Draskovich is not involved in the Bundy case.
Outside the presence of the jury on Monday, Navarro said she hadn’t wanted to order Parker to step down.
She told prosecutors, defense attorneys and a crowded court gallery that she thought Parker was trying to invite jury nullification of charges and deliberately “continuing to make a mockery” of court rulings she handed down before the retrial. Those rulings limited the scope of defense presentations to what the men saw and did, not what they felt or why they acted.
A jury in April found two co-defendants guilty of some charges, but it failed to reach verdicts for Parker, Scott Drexler, Steven Stewart and Richard Lovelien.
Bundy, his sons Ammon and Ryan, and two other defendants are due for trial later this year. Six others, including two other Bundy sons, are slated for trial next year.
Navarro ruled that defendants can’t argue this time that they were acting in self-defense or in the defense of other protesters.
They can’t say they were motivated to drive to southern Nevada from Idaho and Montana after hearing about scuffles involving unarmed Bundy family members and Bureau of Land Management agents using dogs and stun guns.
They can’t refer to criticism by Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval of federal agents for creating what the Republican governor called an “atmosphere of intimidation” in the days before the standoff.
They can’t point to so-called “First Amendment zone” corrals set up for protesters well away from the Bundy ranch; they can’t cite claims of infringement on free-speech and Second Amendment rights; and they can’t refer to the decades in prison they might face if they’re convicted.
“Just because law enforcement is pointing a gun doesn’t mean you get to point one back,” Navarro said Monday.
Parker was famously photographed during the April 2014 standoff flat on his stomach on the pavement of an Interstate 15 overpass, looking down an AK-47-style rifle toward heavily armed federal agents in a dry river bed below.
Drexler is seen in a similar photo, and images show Steven Stewart carrying an assault-style rifle, but not aiming it. Richard Lovelien also had a rifle, but his lawyer, Shawn Perez, said there is no photograph in evidence showing him pointing it at anyone.
Defense attorneys say their clients are being unfairly and unconstitutionally denied a chance to explain for jurors what they saw and heard and why they went to the Bundy ranch.
“We need to be able to defend ourselves, to rebut, to impeach against accusations,” Parker’s attorney, Jess Marchese, protested during morning-long arguments held outside the presence of the jury now in a fourth week of testimony. “That’s why we’re here.”
Drexler was expected to take the stand in his defense, but Stewart and Lovelien said they won’t do so.
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
-
Re: Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher
The Elephant in the Room - Pretrial Detention
This Is Mr. Pretrial Detention
ONCE IN PRISON, A DEFENDANT CANNOT GET A FAIR TRIAL BECAUSE THEY ARE SEVERELY HAMPERED IN THEIR ABILITY TO PREPARE THEIR DEFENSE.
August 16, 2017 Constitution
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...Banner-JPG.jpg
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...on-678x381.jpg
“THIS IS MR. PRETRIAL DETENTION”
by Loren Edward Pearce
As I entered the Bundy ranch house, Angie Bundy, wife of Ryan Bundy greeted me and introduced me to the rest of the family as “Mr. Pretrial Detention”. “Yes”, I said, “I have a one track mind and constantly beat the drum that pretrial detention is not getting the attention it deserves.”
I have long held that the pretrial imprisonment of the political prisoners is the elephant in the room. It seems to me that defense attorneys and prisoner supporters are ignoring the elephant in the room which is that we cannot proceed to trial until the issue of pretrial imprisonment is dealt with.
You see, the very act of throwing an innocent person into prison, prior to their chance to a trial before a jury of peers, is so egregiously unjust, so opposite of everything that the American justice system is supposed to safeguard, that the unfair trial began over 18 months ago, and that the root cause of the injustices in Navarro’s court today are made possible by the pretrial imprisonment.
Once in prison, a defendant cannot get a fair trial because they are severely hampered in their ability to prepare their defense. Prisons are, by design, places that restrict freedom, places that make life difficult for you, places of punishment, places that marginalize and demean you. In such an environment, a defendant is at a huge disadvantage trying to prepare a defense against an all powerful government with unlimited budget and resources at their disposal, and unhampered and unrestricted by prison life.
In a recent interview, at the 30:00 minute mark, Ammon Bundy claims that he has not seen his attorney for almost a year. Because of the strip searches and other inconveniences, the ease of meeting with your attorney is totally different than what it is on the outside. Visiting a client in prison is difficult and serves as a inhibitor for frequent visits from the attorney.
Ammon Bundy, August 5, 2017 Interviewed by Jared Green
It has also been reported by Ryan Bundy and other prisoners that digital thumb drives, hard copy documents, and the opportunity to go to the Clerk of the Court for filings, are hampered and restricted by prison rules and prison procedures.
Prisoners have reported that their legal notes and materials are tampered with by prison staff and that as they are moved around from different cells or different prisons, legal material is often lost.
Furthermore, a basic right is for defendants to meet with witnesses and to discuss testimony and evidence prior to trial. Something out of their reach while in prison.
Of the many fundamental, God given, inalienable and unalienable, natural rights is the right to a presumption of innocence until proven guilty before a jury of peers. This right is so primordial (intuitive, inherent) that it prompted William Blackstone to say, “Better that 10 guilty men go free, than that one innocent man suffer.” Franklin took it further and said that, “Better that 100 guilty men go free than one innocent man suffer.”
Today, we are witnessing the stunning behavior of the prosecution in alliance with Navarro wherein they deny Eric Parker to testify in his own defense and strike his testimony from the record. As they push the defendants into a corner with Bill of Rights destroying orders prohibiting their right to rebut and counter the claims made by the prosecution, we tend to think that the denial of a fair trial started when the new round of trials began following the mistrial.
https://redoubtnews.com/wp-content/u...8/innocent.jpg
In reality, the denial of a fair trial began the second that Navarro ruled that the prisoners were denied a right to pretrial freedom, to prepare their defense in an environment free from the harsh restrictions and atrocities of prison walls and razor wire.
But what can be done about it? Navarro has all the power to do what she wants, backed by Marshals and by Attorney General Sessions. The pretrial detention is a done deal, nothing can be done about it, so let’s move on, it is water under the bridge, better to focus on the federal team’s actions now.
But the elephant begs to differ, There are many things that can be done about the unfairness and injustice of the pretrial, pre-conviction imprisonment:
- Challenge the constitutionality of the Bail Reform Act. There is evidence that it was never properly enacted as law. Rather, it was enacted as a resolution and therefore, does not have the force of law.
- Even if properly enacted as law, it is still unconstitutional. The power of the judge to deny bail is a new power that was never granted by the Magna Carta nor the original Judicial Act of 1789 and as enacted in many state constitutions. Judges never had the discretion to deny bail. The only discretion judges had, prior to the Bail Reform Act, was to set the amount of bail and that was restricted by the 8th amendment dealing with excessive bail.
- Defense attorneys should open every session of trial going on record that their clients are prejudiced by being imprisoned prior to a finding of guilt.
- Defense attorneys can file interlocutory appeals, appeals during the course of a trial, asking the higher court to review the constitutionality of the pretrial detention of the prisoners.
- Habeas corpus pleadings have not been fully exhausted.
- Constant submittal of press releases to mainstream media addressing how fundamentally wrong pretrial detention is.
- Constant reminders to elected officials of how unjust and how deviant pretrial imprisonment is.
There is probably more that could be legally done by defense attorneys in opposition to pre-conviction imprisonment. Suffice it to say, the elephant in the room will not go away and as long as the elephant is there, the prisoners will not have a fair trial, regardless of anything else the federal team (prosecution, judge and marshals) do in relation to heaping injustice on top of injustice.
Please support our coverage of your rights. Donate here: paypal.me/RedoubtNews
Share this:
