Coronavirus

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...b-2643f0908fdf

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...id-800x417.jpg


07/18/22

Top doctors and scientists at the leading U.S. public health agencies are “frustrated, exasperated and alarmed” about the direction of the agencies they work for, according to the authors of a Substack post published last week.

They’re also embarrassed — about “bad science.” And many are leaving.

“It’s like a horror movie I’m being forced to watch and I can’t close my eyes,” said one senior official with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). “People are getting bad advice and we can’t say anything.”

The comment was one of many culled from calls and text messages between officials and the article’s co-authors, Marty Makary M.D., M.P.H., and Tracy Beth Høeg M.D., Ph.D.

Makary and Høeg said the officials who spoke to them agreed to be quoted — but only anonymously, for fear of professional repercussions.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are plagued with “low morale” and “high turnover,” officials told Makary and Høeg.

“At the NIH, doctors and scientists complain to us about low morale and lower staffing: The NIH’s Vaccine Research Center has had many of its senior scientists leave over the last year, including the director, deputy director and chief medical officer,” they wrote.

And it’s no better at the CDC, they said:

“The CDC has experienced a similar exodus. ‘There’s been a large amount of turnover. Morale is low,’ one high-level official at the CDC told us. ‘Things have become so political, so what are we there for?’ Another CDC scientist told us: ‘I used to be proud to tell people I work at the CDC. Now I’m embarrassed.’”

Officials complained the heads of their agencies “are using weak or flawed data to make critically important public health decisions, that such decisions are being driven by what’s politically palatable to people in Washington or to the Biden administration and that they have a myopic focus on one virus instead of overall health.”

One CDC scientist told Makary and Høeg about the shame and frustration within the agency over what happened to U.S. children during the pandemic.

The scientist said:

“CDC failed to balance the risks of COVID with other risks that come from closing schools. Learning loss, mental health exacerbations were obvious early on and those worsened as the guidance insisted on keeping schools virtual. CDC guidance worsened racial equity for generations to come. It failed this generation of children.”

The CDC also ignored natural immunity, according to some officials who declined to be named. “The vast majority of children have already had COVID, but this has made no difference in the blanket mandates for childhood vaccines.”

By mandating “vaccines and boosters for young healthy people, with no strong supporting data, these agencies are only further eroding public trust,” they added.

“I can’t tell you how many people at the FDA have told me, ‘I don’t like any of this, but I just need to make it to my retirement,’” one official told Makary and Høeg.

Commenting on the revelations, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense chairman and chief legal counsel, told The Defender, “The 33-year devolution of NIH from the world’s premier bio research agency into Big Pharma’s servile marketing subsidiary has been an excruciating downfall for NIH’s dwindling cohort of researchers and scientists of integrity.”

Kennedy added:

“The COVID-19 catastrophe exposed to the world that NIH no longer does science or public health and confronted remaining employees with the dilemma that working at NIH means living against conscience. The current exodus captures the last remaining NIH officials who still have one.”

Makary and Høeg said it’s statistically impossible for everyone who works inside U.S. health agencies to have 100% agreement about “such a new and knotty subject.”

“The fact that there is no public dissent or debate can only be explained by the fact that they are — or at least feel that they are — being muzzled,” they wrote. “It is an ancient, moral requirement of our profession to speak up when we believe questionable treatments are being proposed. It is also good for the public.”

“The leaders of the CDC, the FDA and the NIH should welcome internal discussion — even dissension — based on the evidence,” they wrote. “Silencing physicians is not ‘following the science.’”

Makary: COVID vaccines for kids at center of controversy

The Daily Mail reported on Makary and Høeg’s substack post — which also caught the attention of “Fox & Friends” and Fox News’ Tucker Carlson.

In a July 17 interview on “Fox & Friends,” Makary said senior officials — including all three leaders of the vaccine research center at the NIH and top experts at the FDA — are leaving because they see problems with the data and are frustrated.

“The top two vaccine experts at the FDA [in September 2021] quit in protest over political interference, and many people at the CDC told me that people are getting bad advice and we can’t say anything,” he said. “They’re not allowed to go to the media, and at the center of it is the treatment of children.”

bombshell embedded video Dr. Makary
must watch it in the article for now. maybe I can get a video url later.
3:50 video runtime
3.50 video runtime

“Fox & Friends” co-host Pete Hegseth brought up an example Makary cited in his article on the treatment of children:

“In the subgroup of children aged six months to two years, the [Pfizer] trial found that the vaccine could result in a 99% lower chance of infection — but that they also could have a 370% increased chance of being infected.

“In other words, Pfizer reported a range of vaccine efficacy so wide that no conclusion could be inferred. No reputable medical journal would accept such sloppy and incomplete results with such a small sample size. More to the point, these results should have given pause to those who are in charge of public health.”

Yet, without that clinical data, they’re still “pushing vaccines for infants and toddlers, for people who already had COVID and boosters for young children,” Hegseth said.

“That’s right. And parents are not falling for it after nearly a month of the government heavily pushing vaccines in kids under 5,” Makary said. “Only 3% of parents have chosen to get their kids under 5 vaccinated. More parents believe in UFOs I think.”

CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said “people are eager to get their kids vaccinated,” but this is not the case, Makary told Hegseth. Because the “vaccine trial in kids under 5 failed” — the “study was done and it showed no benefit.”

Makary said:

“Now why are we even doing clinical trials if when you get a negative result showing it has no benefit, they’re approving it anyway? You’re making a mockery of the process. This is what people within the agencies are very frustrated about. This is why they’re leaving.

“Moderna’s vaccine had a 4% efficacy and Pfizer, the results were so bad with no statistical significance that one of the internal people within the CDC said that you can inject a child with the vaccine or squirt it in their face and you’ll get the same benefit.”

“If the CDC wants to win some respect back, apologize and show some humility and less absolutism,” he added.

In their article, Makary and Høeg said there’s also an issue of how long a COVID-19 vaccine gives protection, as data in adults show that protection wanes in “a matter of months” and there’s “no such data for young children.”

“It seems criminal that we put out the recommendation to give mRNA Covid vaccines to babies without good data,” a CDC physician told Makary. “We really don’t know what the risks are yet. So why push it so hard?”

“The public has no idea how bad this data really is,” a high-level FDA official told Makary and Høeg. “It would not pass muster for any other authorization.”

“And yet, the FDA and the CDC pushed it through,” Makary and Høeg wrote. That “slap in the face of science may explain why only 40% of parents in rural areas say their pediatricians did not recommend the Covid vaccine for their child.”

White House calling the shots

In a July 15 interview with Tucker Carlson, Makary said doctors everywhere in the world, even in the government, should “always be free to speak up about their public health concerns.”

Yet, right now in the government, “doctors are muzzled.”

“I talked to many doctors for this piece, at NIH and CDC, who are extremely frustrated,” Makary told Carlson. “They’re smart people. They know vaccine efficacy of 4% doesn’t warrant authorization. They also know there’s no health emergency right now among kids six months of age.”

Makary said he learned a lot from interviewing anonymous top officials, and they’re being silenced:

“They know the underlying data. They know it’s inappropriate. They’re not allowed to speak to anyone. If a reporter calls, the communications office has to approve the conversation and if they want to ask the scientist whether or not they want to do this. Tell us what you’re going to tell the reporter and then we’ll decide whether or not to approve it.”

“At the CDC, a bunch of scientists actually said ‘look we recognize the insanity of mass testing — trying to take down every case of the virus in the United States,’” Makary told Carlson. “So they came up with a plan to use sampling data like we do with influenza every year to get better numbers from the hospital of those truly in there for COVID, not just everybody with incidental COVID tests.”

Makary said he was told by top officials the plan was “rejected by the White House.”

“I heard from smart people who were just extremely frustrated that not only are they bypassing the normal scientific process, you really can’t say anything because if they do, they know their jobs are at risk and they’ll be treated very differently,” Makary told Carlson.

“One person said there’s no transparency as to how Dr. [Anthony] Fauci makes his decisions, he doesn’t even consult with the real experts.”

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of Medicine at Stanford University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, praised the “blockbuster article” that confirmed scientists are being subject to tremendous political pressure to distort COVID-19 science and vaccine recommendations.

Jay Bhattacharya
@DrJBhattacharya
·
Follow
An absolute blockbuster article by @TracyBethHoeg and @MartyMakary. Insider interviews with @CDCgov and @NIH scientists reveal tremendous political pressure to distort covid science and vax recommendations. Our public health agencies are in disarray. Excellent reporting!
Marty Makary MD, MPH
@MartyMakary
An ancient trait of the medical profession is to speak up when we believe something is not in the best interest of our patients. Less absolutism and more humility by health agencies would go a long way in rebuilding public trust. My piece w/ @TracyBethHoeg https://commonsense.news/p/us-public...utm_medium=web
9:22 AM · Jul 14, 2022
3.6K
See the latest COVID-19 information on Twitter

Responding to Makary’s interview with Carlson, Dr. Peter McCullough said in a tweet that the FDA needs “immediate oversight and ordered to retract EUA approval.”
[/URL][/SIZE]

embedded video in Tweet - go here


Top doctors and scientists at the leading U.S. public health agencies are “frustrated, exasperated and alarmed” about the direction of the agencies they work for, according to the authors of a Substack post. They’re also embarrassed — about “bad science.”
By
Megan Redshaw

Dachsie comment:
I posted this link a few days ago but am posting again with more extensive show notes.
This is extremely important information from Dr. Yeadon.

_____________


https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...b-2643f0908fdf

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...lXsoet5HwA--~D

In early 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former Pfizer vice-president and senior scientist, realized that something wasn’t quite right with what public health officials were saying about the virus, and how lies and exaggeration led the public to embrace experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

The vaccines were unconventional in design, and despite the option to use safer benign proteins, all four drug companies (Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca) chose to use the most pathologically dangerous part of the virus — the spike protein.

“I predicted this would be dangerous,” Yeadon told Brian Hooker, Ph.D., host of CHD.TV’s “Doctors & Scientists.”

“And my peers on the inside knew that and they all did the same thing,” he said. “It’s not an accident.”

We were told, Yeadon said, that this is a new respiratory virus. But we knew early on, whatever it was, it was generally affecting the elderly — usually those with one or more comorbidities — because their immune systems are old, tired and unresponsive to new immunological threats.

But instead of protecting the only people who were really vulnerable, they locked down everyone, Yeadon said.

“And then they told us, ‘We’ll get you out of this,’ with a vaccine.”

“But if their immune system is old and they don’t respond well to normal pathogens, why would you expect them to respond well to vaccines?” Yeadon asked.

The answer is, “You wouldn’t.”

The whole vaccine strategy was wrong, Yeadon said. All we needed to do was isolate and treat the elderly — instead of pushing vaccines on everyone, including children and pregnant women.

“It wasn’t a mistake,” Yeadon said. “These are the same people who make the flu vaccines that don’t work — and they know it.”

The Centers for Disease Control

is promoting many social control ideas that have nothing to do with controlling physical disease for public health.
The Marxist controllers of "the Biden administration" are the political controllers of "health" matters for the USA. No more science and medicine for the good and the care of public health.

The CDC will double down on turning our public schools and public education into "super-spreader" entities.
__________________

Biden Administration’s CDC Encourages Teachers to Use Leftist Gender Curriculum

https://media.breitbart.com/media/20...ty-640x480.jpg

by Spencer Lindquist 18 Jul 2022

The Biden administration’s Center for Disease Control (CDC) is promoting an activist organization that seeks to embed leftist gender theory in the classroom.

The CDC LGBT Youth Resources page, archived here, directs teachers to access educator resources from the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a leftwing organization that seeks to embed gender theory into America’s classrooms.

“Looking for ways to support Ally Week, No Name-Calling Week or the Day of Silence? Interested in finding ways to bring LGBTQ-visibility into your curriculum? You’ve come to the right place!” GLSEN’s website explains.

The organization continues by noting the guides can be used to direct activism and to embed ideological positions into school curriculum when it says “GLSEN’s education team has created educator guides for each of our Days of Action, along with other resources for increasing LGBTQ visibility and affirmation into any curriculum.”

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Breitbart News
@BreitbartNews


At a afterschool meeting in Colorado, a 12-year-old girl was told if she is "not 100% comfortable in her female body, she’s transgender."

https://pbs.twimg.com/card_img/15476...jpg&name=small

Among GLSEN’s educator guides is “Supporting LGBTQ+ Students of Color,” which instructs teachers to “De-center whiteness in LGBTQ+ history, inclusive curriculum, and visual representation,” “Reflect on your own identities, privileges, and power,” and to “Participate and/or advocate for both LGBTQ+ and anti-racist education training at your school.”

GLSEN maintains a list of books that teachers can use in the classroom to encourage “LGBTQ-visibility.” The list, intended for elementary school children, includes “A is for Activist,” as well as “I am Jazz,” which endorses the idea that children can be transgender.

GLSEN also advocates for men to be able to play in women’s sports and to use women’s restrooms and locker rooms. The organization previously partnered with both the YMCA and Nike to bring an OnlyFans performer to teach children a suggestive form of dancing.

(Instagram ad for GLSEN dance classes in public schools.)

Among GLSEN’s educator guides is “Supporting LGBTQ+ Students of Color,” which instructs teachers to “De-center whiteness in LGBTQ+ history, inclusive curriculum, and visual representation,” “Reflect on your own identities, privileges, and power,” and to “Participate and/or advocate for both LGBTQ+ and anti-racist education training at your school.”

GLSEN maintains a list of books that teachers can use in the classroom to encourage “LGBTQ-visibility.” The list, intended for elementary school children, includes “A is for Activist,” as well as “I am Jazz,” which endorses the idea that children can be transgender.

GLSEN also advocates for men to be able to play in women’s sports and to use women’s restrooms and locker rooms. The organization previously partnered with both the YMCA and Nike to bring an OnlyFans performer to teach children a suggestive form of dancing.

Breitbart News previously revealed the CDC directed LGBT Youth to a chat site that was designed to be kept secret and featured discussions on sex change operations, political activism, and the occult.

Spencer Lindquist is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter @SpencerLndqst and reach out at slindquist@breitbart.com

____________________



https://vaticancatholic.com/hhs-sec-...ll-and-winter/

https://vaticancatholic.com/images/h...and-winter.jpg

"HHS Sec" Xavier Becerra: Expect A Virus "Resurgence" In "The Fall And Winter" - 19 second video

July 18, 2022 1 Comment

____________________________

https://vaticancatholic.com/gates-fu...next-pandemic/

Gates-Funded Organization Names 11 Viruses As Potential Candidates For The “Next Pandemic”

thegatewaypundit.com July 18, 2022 1 Comment

original source:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...next-pandemic/

https://vaticancatholic.com/images/g...t-pandemic.jpg


"Had enough of Covid? No worries! According to a Gates-funded international organization, there will be more available in the future.

The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) identified 11 viruses that have the potential to cause the 'next pandemic.'

'The COVID-19 pandemic wasn’t the first to devastate the world and it won’t be the last. In a new series, we round up emerging infectious threats that have the potential to erupt into global pandemics,' the organization wrote on its website."

According to Iffim, GAVI is an international organization created in 2000 – a global Vaccine Alliance, bringing together public and private sectors with the purpose of ‘saving lives and protecting people’s health by increasing the use of vaccines in an equitable and sustainable manner.’

______________

Dachsie comment:

Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are all inextricably connected to the WHO, the USA CDC, NIH, NIAID ,FDA, the "Biden administration" , the CCP Chinese Communist Party and of course, Pfizer and BigPharma.

_____

"Emerging infectious threats" - the gift that keeps on giving.

Expose the truth in love of Christ the King.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...7813685825.jpg

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...next-pandemic/

Below is the list of viruses mentioned on GAVI’s website:

Rift Valley fever – The risk of a pandemic from a disease that affects farm animals may seem low, but the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has classed Rift Valley fever as a category A bioterrorism agent because of its potential to devastate large-scale agricultural economies and cause social disruption.

Hantavirus – The long incubation period combined with the emergence of New World species causing HPS mean that hantaviruses are becoming an increasing concern.

Another coronavirus – Although the development of COVID-19 vaccines may help to end the current COVID-19 pandemic, ongoing high rates of infection in many countries could lead to the emergence of further variants capable of evading vaccine-induced immunity. This could mean people continue to develop COVID-19.

Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever – The wide geographic spread of the hard-bodied Hyalommamarginatum ticks that carry CCHF virus, and its persistent circulation, means the risk of spill-over from animals to humans is high. Factors such as climate change and the movement of livestock or wild animals may further increase its geographic spread.

Lassa fever – The combination of a long incubation time and the fact that four in five people who become infected with Lassa virus have no symptoms means the disease can spread easily through international travel.

Marburg – As Marburg virus can spread from human to human through contact of bodily fluids, much like Ebola. As outbreaks in Europe and the US have already shown, increasing globalisation and international travel mean that the risk for global spread is high, especially when the incubation period could be up to three weeks. This could be disastrous given its high death rate.

Yellow fever – So far, yellow fever has never been reported in Asia or the Western Pacific but, as Aedes aegypti is endemic in these regions, it would only take a few introductions by people travelling from Africa or South America for the virus to spread rapidly.

H5N1 and H7N9 influenza – Since Spanish flu, there have been three pandemics – H2N2 in 1956-7, H3N2 in 1968 and H1N1 in 2009 – and before COVID-19 it was widely assumed that the next pandemic would be caused by influenza. The risk is high particularly with two subtypes, H5N1 and H7N9.

Chikungunya – Chikungunya has already been a pandemic, albeit one that didn’t affect the Global North. In 2004, a large outbreak in Kenya spilled out into the islands of the Indian Ocean and Asia and led to a pandemic that spanned several years and had more than a million cases. This means there is a growing possibility we could see another pandemic.

Ebola – if the virus mutates in ways that allow it to spread via respiratory droplets, as COVID-19 does, that would increase the potential for it to spread more easily and become a pandemic threat.

Nipah virus – The disease is also so deadly that many governments classify it as a bioterrorism threat and limit the laboratories that are allowed to culture and study it.

https://thevaccinecourt.substack.com...m_source=email

Pharmacists now can prescribe Paxlovid.

This might be just another step in the process of usurping the states.
Wayne A Rohde
7 min ago

With the announcement by the FDA right after the 4th of July celebrations, pharmacists in the US will be able to prescribe Paxlovid, the COVID-19 drug from Pfizer.

Paxlovid is an oral anti-viral pill. Pfizer promotes it as a drug that will reduce the risk of severe illness, hospitalization and death from COVID-19. Sound familiar. Same song, different verse.

The drug is classified as an EUA drug, not having been granted full licensed drug approval. The FDA revised the Emergency Use Authorization statutes to authorize state-licensed pharmacists to prescribe the medication to eligible patients.

The specific authorization falls under Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act after a declaration by the Secretary of HHS. This in turn modifies the intent of The PREP Act declaration amendments.

There are some limitations. The patient’s health records provided to the pharmacist cannot be older than 12 months. And the FDA directed pharmacists to go with the most recent reports of laboratory blood work.

I guess this is the way to circumvent the patient’s doctors and to get Paxlovid into the hands of patients. More money for Pfizer and now a much desired revenue stream for pharmacies such as Walgreens and CVS.

On my podcast, The Right on Point podcast, my guest Dr. James Meehan discusses the dangers of Paxlovid and why our government setout to discredit any and all safety reviews of Ivermectin and HCQ. Click here to watch and listen to Dr. Meehan go step by step.

But I am more concerned about what this does for state regulations of vaccine policy and now drug policy.

It is commonly held that the states decide who can prescribe medicines, who can administer vaccinations and who can disburse medications. The states regulate this with the use of state boards and policy.

Currently 43 states allow pharmacists to prescribe medications for minor aliments, cuts, burns, blister treatments, minor joint pain, yeast infections, acid reflux and the very common hemorrhoid problems.

But now, states are loosing their regulation to the federal government.

In August of 2020, the Secretary of HHS issued an amendment to The PREP Act to allow pharmacists to administer the traditional childhood vaccination schedule to kids as young as three years of age.

I wrote about this in a piece “Did the Federal Government Just Secretly Take Over Vaccine Policy Usurping the Authority of the States?”

Now I ask a very similar question. Is the Federal Government usurping the authority of the States with this action?

It is an EUA regulated drug. So this order could disappear when the EUA status expires. Or by then, Paxlovid might have full regulatory approval. Will pharmacists will authority to continue to prescribe? Who knows?

My questions to HRSA regarding The PREP Act authority to administer childhood vaccines remains in effect until The PREP Act expires in 2024. Or it could be extended. Yet HRSA officials are silent, very silent regarding the sun-downing of any amendment.

Donate

I wonder if FDA officials will be the same for this EUA statute?

Stay tuned.

Keep learning, keep challenging yourself and always, always question authority.

Make it a good day.

All FDA regulations place Man into the Animal category. If you feel that you are an animal then you are livestock. These are FOOD as well as DRUG regulations.

FDA is an administrative law agency. As I posted elsewhere administrative law is classified the same as BILLS OF ATTAINDER and are specifically prohibited by constitution.

The fact that there are ADMINISTRATIVE LAW agencies tolerated is one proof that the 14th amendment cancelled the organic constitution.

The other proof of this insurrection against the constitution is that no U.S. government since 1878 has bothered to think about repayment of the civil war debt now standing at $346,681,016.

Ephesians 3:20

Now to Him who is able to [carry out His purpose and] do superabundantly more than all that we dare ask or think [infinitely beyond our greatest prayers, hopes, or dreams], according to His power that is at work within us,


Amplified bible

https://rumble.com/v14ol9b-dr.-james...m_medium=email

Was greatly encouraged by the fight this good Doctor James Meehan M.D. is putting up.

Watch this video and be encouraged too.

Dr. James Meehan - The benefits of Ivermectin

1:04:17 video runtime

Also tune in to

Rumble The Right on Point podcast

https://rumble.com/c/c-1726987



The Right on Point podcast Published May 14, 2022 345 Views

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...93d0fd1062.jpg

July 19, 2022

Get links to any of the stories listed below by clicking on...

Top News of the Day

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsalabs.org/7-19-22defender?wvpId=a64cbeac-eb3d-41f6-974e-52f8708741e3


How CDC Blatantly Uses Weekly Reports to Spread COVID Disinformation: Three Examples

Don’t Let ‘Voodoo Science’ Keep Djokovic From Competing in US Open



42% of Women Report Heavier Menstrual Bleeding After COVID Vaccines



Pfizer Annual Revenue Doubled — to $81.3 Billion — Thanks to COVID Vaccines



GMO Salmon, Pork and Chicken — Coming to Your Dinner Plate Soon?

Policies Designed to Give Money to the Rich Drive Inflation for the Rest of Us

U.S. Cardiologist Defends Novak Djokovic’s Vaccine Stance: Can’t Risk Heart Damage + More



San Diego School Board President Says Students Must Wear Masks or Don’t Bother Returning to School + More