Jesus Christ, The Way, The Truth, and The Life

https://myemail.constantcontact.com/...id=lzO5ubyJhrs

https://files.constantcontact.com/99...a.png?rdr=true


952 Kelly Rd., Mt. Jackson, VA 22842

Tel: 540-856-8453 E-Mail: director@kolbecenter.org

"For me You have created the skies scattered with stars...and all the beautiful things on earth."

St. Maximilian Kolbe


Dear Friends of the Kolbe Center,

Glory to Jesus Christ!

One of the highlights of our recent leadership retreat was the performance of the play “Wife, Mother and Mystic,” on the life and times of Blessed Anna Maria Taigi. It was during Blessed Anna Maria’s lifetime, that the false philosophy of the Enlightenment began to make serious inroads within Catholic academia. This, in turn, led to a big push within Catholic academia to allow the publication and circulation of heliocentric books without any mention of the authoritative condemnations of 1616 and 1633. As censor librorum of Rome, the heroic Dominican friar Fr. Anfossi resisted the attempts of these “progressive elements” within the Vatican and refused to grant the imprimatur to heliocentric books that did not remind readers of the prior Magisterial condemnations of works which promoted heliocentrism as a description of reality and not just as a scientific hypothesis.
https://files.constantcontact.com/99...4.jpg?rdr=true

In doing the background research for the play, we were amazed to discover how deeply the false uniformitarian naturalism of Descartes and Immanuel Kant had penetrated the thinking of Catholic intellectuals, both clergy and laity by the beginning of the nineteenth century. In a scene that had to be cut from the script for the sake of time, we realistically imagined a conversation between Pope Pius VII and Fr. Anfossi, in which the Pope commented on the kinds of conjectures that were already rife among intellectual priests and laity.
Pius VII

Only yesterday, at the dinner table, I listened to a debate of sorts between a young French priest and an Italian Monsignor. The young French cleric insisted that the chronology derived from the Bible—and from the sacred history of Genesis in particular—has lost all credibility in light of recent discoveries in the field of geology.

Anfossi

May I ask what sort of “discoveries” he mentioned, Your Holiness?

Pius VII

He mentioned three bodies of evidence—the vast layers of sedimentary rock all over the earth; the enormous extent of volcanic rock; and the size of river valleys throughout Europe and all over the Earth. He cited the case of the remote part of Vivarais where he had earlier served as a parish priest. On the floors of some of the valleys there were unmistakable lava flows, which had been eroded into small gorges since their eruption. He claimed that he could ‘calculate the time’ required for this erosion, and hence the age of the eruptions. He estimated that it would take ‘several centuries or thousands of years’ just for angular fragments of the hard volcanic rock to become by attrition the smooth rounded pebbles found in the river-beds further downstream; privately he estimated from this that some six million years must have elapsed since the lavas were erupted. Yet these were some of the most recent of the volcanic rocks in the area.

Fr. Anfossi

I wonder if our esteemed French cleric ever did a real experiment. I mean did he ever even take a piece of that rock and leave it in a fast-moving stream? I doubt it, Your Holiness. These champions of “science” seem to devote much more time and energy to weaving theories than to examining the evidence.
https://files.constantcontact.com/99...2.jpg?rdr=true

Pope Pius VII

Pius VII

In fairness, Fr. Anfossi, this young priest did seem to bring forward some other
observations that would be very difficult to explain in terms of the traditional Biblical chronology. He mentioned many places where tiny rivers flow through enormous valleys so that if one were to calculate the time that it would take for the river to erode the valley at the current rate of flow, it would take millions of years.

Fr. Anfossi

But, Your Holiness, imagine the conditions that existed during the great Deluge when the waters ran off the continents at the end of the Flood. Think of the torrents of water a thousand times greater than the Nile or the Amazon that would have flowed off the continental surfaces into the ocean basins. Think of the channels they must have carved as they rushed into the sea. Those torrents could easily have carved the great valleys that we see all over the Earth in a few weeks!

Pius VII

Fr. Anfossi, your words are a balm to my ears!
It is hard to believe that conversations like this were already taking place 200 years ago, but they were. And it is tragic to realize how easily the “scientific” objections to the truth of the sacred history of Genesis could have been answered—if the majority of Catholic intellectuals had not eventually allowed themselves to be intimidated by the boundless confidence of the progressives and their technological inventions. In the coming months, we hope to produce a series of handouts that address the principal objections to the traditional doctrine of creation succinctly so that any Catholic can defend the traditional reading of Genesis without having a great deal of specialized knowledge.
https://files.constantcontact.com/99...c.jpg?rdr=true

I want to thank all of you—and there were many!—who wrote to Mike Fradd’s secretary asking him to host a debate between two Kolbe speakers and two Catholic Answers speakers. His secretary finally had to write to me and ask me to call off the email bombardment. I promised that I would ask you not to send any more emails, but I told her that if she understood to what extent the traditional doctrine of creation has been censored and suppressed, even within Catholic intellectual circles, she would have compassion on us and ask her employer to accede to our requests.

Let us now concentrate our efforts on bombarding Heaven, asking Our Lady of Good Counsel to intercede for us, so that the true Catholic doctrine of creation can be defended in the public forum, and so that She will obtain for us the grace to be effective champions of her Divine Son’s Genesis Revelation.

Yours in Christ through the Immaculata in union with St. Joseph,

Hugh Owen

Dachsie comment:

Was not sure whether to post this Election Fraud thread or RINO thread.
Decided to post it here here as a Christian act of exposing the SWAMP SKUNKS.

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/...w/original.jpg

_____________________________


https://jobs.certifiedconspiracy.com/?p=5655

“You’re a Weakling” Trump Goes Nuclear at Bill Barr

July 12, 2021 Chidi U.S. Politics
"You’re a Weakling” Trump Goes Nuclear at Bill Barr

Donald Trump called ex-Attorney General Bill Barr a “swamp creature” after Barr turned on his former commander-in-chief and discredited Trump’s false claims about election fraud

“Barr was a ‘swamp creature’ who was devastated when the Radical Left wanted to impeach him. He, and other RINOs (you see it all the time!), always fold. If he becomes ‘less’ for President Trump, maybe they will leave him alone. It takes a very strong and special person to go against the ‘mob,'” Trump said in a Tuesday statement. “Bill Barr was not that person.”

Trump’s remarks come two days after The Atlantic published a new piece from Jonathan Karl, who spoke to Barr about Trump’s claims about the 2020 presidential election.

“We realized from the beginning it was just bulls–t,” Barr was quoted saying.

“My attitude was: It was put-up or shut-up time,” Barr reportedly told Karl. “If there was evidence of fraud, I had no motive to suppress it. But my suspicion all the way along was that there was nothing there. It was all bulls–t.”

Barr also told Karl that then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pressured him to publicly speak out against Trump’s efforts to overturn the election in mid-November, citing the January Senate runoff elections in Georgia.

“Bill, I look around, and you are the only person who can do it,” McConnell allegedly told the former DOJ head.

Shortly after the Atlantic article was published, Barr told a reporter at the Associated Press that his department never found fraud that could have overturned the election.

Trump said Tuesday. “I lost confidence in Bill Barr long before the 2020 Presidential Election Scam. It was when he dismissed and didn’t act on the very powerful Horowitz Report, and instead gave everything over to John Durham, who has seemingly disappeared from the planet.”

______________________

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...eneral/619298/

How Barr Finally Turned on Trump
Jonathan D. Karl
12-16 minutes

Donald Trump is a man consumed with grievance against people he believes have betrayed him, but few betrayals have enraged him more than what his attorney general did to him. To Trump, the unkindest cut of all was when William Barr stepped forward and declared that there had been no widespread fraud in the 2020 election, just as the president was trying to overturn Joe Biden’s victory by claiming that the election had been stolen.

In a series of interviews with me this spring, Barr spoke, for the first time, about the events surrounding his break with Trump. I have also spoken with other senior officials in the Trump White House and Justice Department, who provided additional details about Barr’s actions and the former president’s explosive response. Barr and those close to him have a reason to tell his version of this story. He has been widely seen as a Trump lackey who politicized the Justice Department. But when the big moment came after the election, he defied the president who expected him to do his bidding.

Barr’s betrayal came on December 1, over lunch in the attorney general’s private dining room with Michael Balsamo, a Justice Department beat reporter at the Associated Press. Also in attendance were the DOJ chief of staff, Will Levi, and spokesperson Kerri Kupec. Balsamo was not told the reason for the invitation. When Barr dropped his bombshell between bites of salad, he mumbled, and Balsamo wasn’t sure that he had caught what the attorney general had said.

“Just to be crystal clear,” Balsamo asked, “are you saying—”

“Sir, I think you better repeat what you just said,” Kupec interjected.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr repeated. This time Balsamo heard him.

David A. Graham: Trump’s coup attempt didn’t start on January 6

Balsamo’s story appeared on the AP newswire shortly after lunch ended: “Disputing Donald Trump’s persistent baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department had uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election.”

The story blew a hole in the president’s claims. Nobody seriously questioned Barr’s conservative credentials or whether he had been among Trump’s most loyal Cabinet secretaries. His conclusion sent a definitive message that the effort to overturn the election was without merit.

Barr told me that Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell had been urging him to speak out since mid-November. Publicly, McConnell had said nothing to criticize Trump’s allegations, but he told Barr that Trump’s claims were damaging to the country and to the Republican Party. Trump’s refusal to concede was complicating McConnell’s efforts to ensure that the GOP won the two runoff elections in Georgia scheduled for January 5.

To McConnell, the road to maintaining control of the Senate was simple: Republicans needed to make the argument that with Biden soon to be in the White House, it was crucial that they have a majority in the Senate to check his power. But McConnell also believed that if he openly declared Biden the winner, Trump would be enraged and likely act to sabotage the Republican Senate campaigns in Georgia. Barr related his conversations with McConnell to me. McConnell confirms the account.

“Look, we need the president in Georgia,” McConnell told Barr, “and so we cannot be frontally attacking him right now. But you’re in a better position to inject some reality into this situation. You are really the only one who can do it.”

“I understand that,” Barr said. “And I’m going to do it at the appropriate time.”

On another call, McConnell again pleaded with Barr to come out and shoot down the talk of widespread fraud.

“Bill, I look around, and you are the only person who can do it,” McConnell told him.

Levi, the Justice Department chief of staff, had also been urging Barr to contradict Trump’s assertions. But Barr had said nothing publicly to indicate that he disagreed with the president about the election. In fact, the week after the election, he gave prosecutors the green light to investigate “substantial allegations” of vote irregularities that “could potentially impact the outcome” of the election. The move overturned long-standing policy that the Justice Department does not investigate voter fraud until after an election is certified. The theory behind the policy is that the department’s responsibility is to prosecute crimes, not to get involved in election disputes. Barr’s reversal of the policy was interpreted by some as a sign that he might use the department to help Trump overturn the election.

Donald Ayer: Bill Barr’s unconstitutional campaign to reelect the president

But Barr told me he had already concluded that it was highly unlikely that evidence existed that would tip the scales in the election. He had expected Trump to lose and therefore was not surprised by the outcome. He also knew that at some point, Trump was going to confront him about the allegations, and he wanted to be able to say that he had looked into them and that they were unfounded. So, in addition to giving prosecutors approval to open investigations into clear and credible allegations of substantial fraud, Barr began his own, unofficial inquiry into the major claims that the president and his allies were making.

“My attitude was: It was put-up or shut-up time,” Barr told me. “If there was evidence of fraud, I had no motive to suppress it. But my suspicion all the way along was that there was nothing there. It was all bullshit.”

The Department of Justice ended up conducting no formal investigations of voter fraud, but as part of Barr’s informal review, he asked the U.S. Attorney in Michigan about Trump’s claim that mysterious “ballot dumps” in Detroit had secured Biden’s victory in the state.

As proof of fraud, Trump’s allies had pointed to videos showing boxes filled with ballots arriving at the TCF Center, in Detroit, to be counted after the 8 p.m. deadline for votes to be cast. But Barr quickly found that there was a logical explanation. It had to do with how the 662 precincts in Wayne County, home to Detroit, tabulate their votes. “In every other county, they count the ballots at the precinct, but in Wayne County, they bring them into one central counting place. So the boxes are coming in all night. The fact that boxes are coming in—well, that’s what they do.”

Furthermore, Trump performed better against Biden in Detroit than he had against Hillary Clinton in 2016. Biden received 1,000 fewer votes in Detroit than Clinton had, and Trump received 5,000 more votes than he had four years earlier. Trump didn’t lose Michigan because of “illegal” ballots cast in Detroit. He lost Michigan because Biden beat him badly in the suburbs.

Barr also looked into allegations that voting machines across the country were rigged to switch Trump votes to Biden votes. He received two briefings from cybersecurity experts at the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. “We realized from the beginning it was just bullshit,” Barr told me, noting that even if the machines somehow changed the count, it would show up when they were recounted by hand. “It’s a counting machine, and they save everything that was counted. So you just reconcile the two. There had been no discrepancy reported anywhere, and I’m still not aware of any discrepancy.”

After the lunch with Balsamo, Barr and Levi went to the White House for a previously scheduled meeting with Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. After talking briefly with Meadows, they went upstairs to White House Counsel Pat Cipollone’s office. As they were conferring, one of the counsel’s aides knocked on the door and told Cipollone that the president wanted to see him and then, pointing to Barr, the aide said, “And he is looking for you.”

Barr, Levi, and Cipollone walked to the president’s personal dining room near the Oval Office. Trump was sitting at the table. Meadows was sitting next to him with his arms crossed; the White House adviser Eric Herschmann stood off to the side. The details of this meeting were described to me by several people present. One told me that Trump had “the eyes and mannerism of a madman.”

He went off on Barr.

“I think you’ve noticed I haven’t been talking to you much,” Trump said to him. “I’ve been leaving you alone.”

Barr later told others that the comment was reminiscent of a line in the movie Dr. Strangelove, in which the main character, Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper, says, “I do not avoid women, Mandrake, but I do deny them my essence.” Trump, Barr thought, was saying that he had been denying him his essence.

Trump brought up Barr’s AP interview.

“Did you say that?”

“Yes,” Barr responded.

“How the fuck could you do this to me? Why did you say it?”

“Because it’s true.”

The president, livid, responded by referring to himself in the third person: “You must hate Trump. You must hate Trump.”

Read: How Trump could attempt a coup

Barr thought that the president was trying to control himself, but he seemed angrier than he had ever seen him. His face was red. Barr’s AP interview was dominating every cable news channel except the one Trump was watching. The television in the room was tuned to the right-wing, pro-Trump network One America News, which was broadcasting a committee hearing of the Michigan legislature. The hearing featured disproven allegations of massive election fraud, including the testimony of a woman named Melissa Carone, who had worked at the counting location in Detroit and told the committee, “Everything that happened at the TCF Center was fraud. Every single thing.” The next day, Carone would testify again, next to Rudy Giuliani, during which time she slurred her words and appeared to be drunk. (Carone later denied that she had been drunk.)

“They saw the boxes going in!” Trump yelled, referring to the stories about boxes of illegal ballots being counted.
Recommended Reading

“You know, Mr. President, there are 662 precincts in Wayne County,” Barr said. Trump seemed taken aback that he knew the exact number. “It’s the only county with all the boxes going to a central place, and you actually did better there this time around than you did last time. You keep on saying that the Department of Justice is not looking at this stuff, and we are looking at it in a responsible way. But your people keep on shoveling this shit out.”

As Trump ranted about other examples of fraud, Meadows continued to sit silently with his arms crossed, his posture suggesting that he, too, was upset by what Barr had done.

“You know, you only have five weeks, Mr. President, after an election to make legal challenges,” Barr said. “This would have taken a crackerjack team with a really coherent and disciplined strategy. Instead, you have a clown show. No self-respecting lawyer is going anywhere near it. It’s just a joke. That’s why you are where you are.”

Interestingly, Trump didn’t argue when Barr told him that his “clown show” legal team had wasted time. In fact, he said, “You may be right about that.”

After going through his litany of claims—stolen ballots, fake ballots, dead people voting, rigged voting machines—Trump switched to other grievances, shouting at Barr for failing to prosecute Biden’s son Hunter. “If that had been one of my kids, they would have been all over him!” he said. By the end of the meeting, Trump was doing almost all of the talking. Why hadn’t Barr released John Durham’s report on the origins of the Russia investigation before the election? Why hadn’t he prosecuted former FBI Director James Comey? Trump was banging on the table. He said that Barr had been worthless.

As Barr left, he was unsure whether he still had a job. Had Trump just fired him? And if not, shouldn’t he quit? Why remain attorney general after what the president had just said to him? His status had been left up in the air.

The next morning, Barr received a call from Meadows. “I think there’s a way through this,” Meadows told him. He could prevent Trump from firing him, but he wanted an assurance from Barr that he wouldn’t resign. “Are you willing to stay?” Meadows asked.

“I’m not going to sandbag you,” Barr said. “I will give you a warning if I’m going to leave, and No. 2, I’ll stay as long as I’m needed.”

Barr almost immediately began to regret his decision to stay. His statement on election fraud did nothing to deter Trump, who was now listening, almost exclusively, to Giuliani and others outside his administration. They were telling him that he was still going to win the election.

Two weeks later, Barr went down to the White House to tell the president that he planned to resign before the end of the year. It was their first meeting since their confrontation. To defuse the tension, Barr had written an effusive resignation letter, which he handed to the president when he got to the Oval Office. The letter praised Trump’s record and played directly into his complaints about how he had been treated by Democrats, saying his efforts “had been met by a partisan onslaught against you in which no tactic, no matter how abusive and deceitful, was out of bounds.”

Trump read the letter while Barr was sitting across from him. “This is pretty good,” he said.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqB6Dky-yRE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqB6Dky-yRE


The Vortex — Oh, Here We Go Again


7:30 video runtime

Church Militant
286K subscribers
You cause division.

Here's the investigation we shared with the bishop:
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/a.

____________

A TRANSCRIPT may be available tomorrow at
ChurchMilitant.com

Episcopal Sodomy: Gay Seminarian Pipeline
News: Video Reports
https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/episcopal-sodomy-gay-seminarian-pipeline

______________

TRANSCRIPT


A brief personal story to kick things off, if we may.

When Church Militant was in Baltimore last November, where backroom deals between the city and the bishops forced us to have to sue — and win — simply to exercise our First Amendment rights, we had the occasion to talk with a bishop I have known personally for a number of years. I asked him point blank, "Your Excellency, straight up, what exactly is the bishops' problem with Church Militant?" He said, "Honestly? No soft-selling?" I said, "Straight up." He said, "It's because you're divisive; you create division."

Now, for the record, we hear that charge leveled against us all the time by bureaucratic bishops and their sycophants, so it's not like we were appalled. In fact, my only thought was, "Here we go again with the same old deflection." That led to us having a brief discussion on the question of being "divisive." I said, "Your Excellency, how can any of you call us divisive for simply shining a light on the division you all have created by coddling homosexuals within your own ranks, the destruction of the liturgy and so forth?" We don't create it; we just talk about it, while you guys sweep it under the rug.

He said — in a way that actually surprised me — "How do you know all the gay stuff you guys report on is true? Where's the proof?" That is actually a hysterical, uninformed question (or one meant to completely deflect from what he already knew), implying we have no idea of what we report on, don't check the facts (nor double check them) and all that kind of thing.
We don't create it; we just talk about it while you guys sweep it under the rug.
Gab
Tweet

So I proposed to him that once we get back to Detroit, let me go through our archives — thousands of such stories about the sodomite culture in the clergy — and send him one. I then offered to meet with him and any other bishops at a private location without anyone else knowing, totally off the record, to have a frank discussion about all of this.

They could ask whatever they wanted, and I would be happy to answer because, frankly, we know a heck of a lot more than what we say publicly. The only reason we don't broadcast everything is that some of the info we have is so limited in regards to who actually knows it, that if we said it out loud, bishops could easily figure out the source and retaliate against them.

Strange business this is, exposing the vast corruption in the Church while having to protect good men in the Church from being exposed. I never really faced these problems in my secular news career, at least not like this. But then again, our sources were seldom from a man who was under obedience and could be completely screwed over for the rest of his natural life by a vindictive homosexual "queen" wearing a miter. So we returned to Detroit; I filled the staff in on the discussion and asked them, "Which story have we done that you would consider would give the bishop the proof he said he needed about gay clergy?"

Quick aside — I don't believe for one minute the bishops, any bishop, is unaware of this filth, but I told him I would provide it, so I did. Through a mutual acquaintance, we sent him our report on the Church's own internal investigation on the South American gay-seminarian pipeline, a story that Church Militant broke, and the entire Catholic establishment media was absolutely crickets on — not a peep.

Another quick aside — the Catholic establishment media, such as it is, is completely revolting and disgusting, and if they don’t think they will have to answer to Almighty God when they die for their complicity and cooperation in the spiritual victimization of souls they participate in by covering up for and enabling gay bishops and priests, then they have another thought coming.

So how did it all end? We sent the video file through a mutual friend, so we knew he received it. We have no idea if he actually watched it; we never heard a peep from the bishop. If we revealed who he was — recently celebrated for his "bravery" — you’d be shocked. That was back in November.

This is how this crowd operates; they are disingenuous as hell — great actors, schemers and plotters, always ready to condemn those who are on to their game. But to the rest of the sleeping Catholic laity, they get to present themselves as the bishop who must be followed and obeyed, never questioned. And when caught red-handed, he can offer some crying-in-his-soup apology and then go straight back to his ways.
We know a heck of a lot more than what we say publicly.
Gab
Tweet

This is precisely why nothing ever changes in the Church of modernism, the Church of Nice, because for a myriad of reasons and rationalizations, the will to change is nonexistent. As circumstances would have it, we bumped into this bishop somewhat recently and exchanged greetings, albeit very briefly. He saw me for an instant, acknowledged me when I said "hello," and then, like a bolt of lightning, tipped his head and scurried away faster than a chariot ride to Heaven. The lesson here — even the ones you think are good, often are not. Just because they are better than Cupich or Tobin or McElroy doesn't mean jack. That’s a pretty low bar.

They are cowards who will not deal with the carnage in the Church in a straightforward manner because they know the personal cost they will have to pay. And like other "leaders" who are morally bankrupt or corrupt, they deflect from their own willful failures and refuse to consider the evidence — more specifically proof — that they themselves have asked for.

It’s a game to these men, not faith. Some of them are truly evil and wicked. Others are cowards, but none of them care enough about souls to do anything serious about it. The "good" ones have a cohort about them, usually wealthy enablers or lay Catholics high up in the Church establishment, who praise them and ignore their misdeeds so as to keep the laity peacefully asleep.

So as a brief mental exercise, knowing all this, which you would not know if Church Militant hadn't revealed it to you, answer the question: Who are the real "dividers"? And in case you are curious about exactly what report we sent to him, we've attached a link down below to Special Report: Episcopal Sodomy. No wonder he either didn't watch it or refused to acknowledge it — coward. Weak men are the bane of the Church and Western civilization.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJdMbgG3Kqs&t=107s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJdMbgG3Kqs&t=107s

Texas doctor arrested for allegedly contaminating IV bags

2:03 video runtime


ABC News
13.6M subscribers
Authorities arrested a doctor in North Dallas, Texas, after surveillance footage showed him tampering with patients’ IV bags, allegedly adding nerve-blocking agents to the contents that left one dead.

_______________

Dachsie comment:

Suspect is Dr. Raynaldo RiveraOrtiz, Jr. M.D.

Baylor Scott & White hospital should screen prospective M.D. and nurse employees for psychopathy. Sounds like the female doctor who took an IV bag home to treat her own dehydration probably was doing something wrong.

The other matter that this anesthesiologist was being investigated for ?

one commenter on YouTube said this...

Asturias Celtic
Asturias Celtic
2 days ago
the man is a psychopath. He is mad because the medical board disciplined him because he had an incident where he shot his neighbor's dog with a pellet and didn't report it to them. Animal abusers are psychopaths and a threat to humans.

_____

Baylor Scott & White it was I think a hospital that has taken away Dr. Peter McCullough's hospital privileges.
Think twice about going to any Baylor Scott & White hospital ever again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQtInhFQYzk&t=112s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQtInhFQYzk&t=112s

2:22 video runtime

Trump warns of ‘problems’ if indicted
21,661 views
Sep 16, 2022
164
Dislike
Share
Save
ABC News
13.6M subscribers
While declaring himself innocent in the Mar-a-Lago documents case, the former president insisted any indictment would “not keep him from running for president.” ABC News’ Andrea Fujii reports.

_______________
Dachsie comment:

I agree with President Trump that people will appear to stand behind Trump if he is indicted, but I say that many of those people primarily would be standing against The DOJ and the FBI in doing so.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZZxKuZ_kSM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZZxKuZ_kSM

Judicial Watch weekly report

Court Slams Biden DOJ in Trump Raid Case, What is Biden Hiding in Delaware? & Much More!

35:56 video runtime

September 18, 2022


Judicial Watch
503K subscribers

Judicial Watch President @TomFitton discusses the latest news relating to the appointment of a special master on the Trump raid by the DOJ, our court battle over Joe Biden's Senate records in Delaware, and much more!

Here is the text weekly report.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/what-i...eekly%20update

September 16, 2022 | Judicial Watch
What is Biden Hiding?!

https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-con...v1-768x401.jpg

Must watch this. Understand that there are many people will do this for money and that there some very rich people who have plenty of money to do this propaganda.


Source: thegatewaypundit.com

Harvard Attorney and TikTok Influencer States Soros Funded Group Offered to Pay $400 For Anti-Trump Propaganda Video About January 6th

Mr. Moore recently disclosed on a video that he was contacted by a person from the Good Information Foundation, a non-profit arm of the Good Information Inc organization. {Direct Rumble Link} Good Information Inc was founded by billionaires Reid Hoffman and George Soros {citation}. Mr Moore recently stated in one of his videos that he was offered $400 by the Good Information group, to spread false and defamatory information about President Trump related to the January 6 investigation.

WATCH: embedded video


https://rumble.com/v1kh8ix-tiktoker-...ropaganda.html

TikToker reveals that he was offered money to make an anti-Trump "propaganda post."
The Post Millennial Clips
Published September 17, 2022 143,048 Views

Lawyer and TikToker @trialbypreston reveals that he was offered money to make an anti-Trump "propaganda post."

Do you see how they are trying to incite a civil war and doing everything they can to push the people to the precipice.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...4.09.37-PM.jpg


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-...4.09.37-PM.jpg






Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Keith Pekau
@KeithPekau
US House candidate, IL-06
The SAFE-T Act:
❌ Abolishes cash bail for almost every offense.
❌ Individuals on electronic monitoring must be in violation for 48 hours before law enforcement can act.
❌ Prohibits officers from removing trespassers from your residence or business.


Watch embedded video on this Tweet.

_____________

In California and now Illinois, anyone can come into your yard and sleep in your shed and you will have to decide what you are going to do to get rid of the person because the police are now prohibited by law from doing anything other than give a ticket.

________________

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...riminals-walk/



INSANITY: Illinois Democrats Eliminate Cash Bail System on Felonies Including Second-Degree Murder, Aggravated Battery, Arson, Kidnapping, Drug-induced Homicide, and Looting — Lets Criminals Walk!

In Illinois, Democrats recently passed a new law that will eliminate the cash bail system starting on January 1, 2023. This is according to the new law aimed at reforming the state’s criminal justice system.

This will result in the release on no bail while awaiting court date of those accused of certain felonies, such as “second-degree murder, aggravated battery, and arson without bail, as well as drug-induced homicide, kidnapping, burglary, robbery, intimidation, aggravated DUI, aggravated fleeing and eluding, drug offenses and threatening a public official.”
Democrat Gov. JB Pritzker signed HB 3653 THE SAFE-T (Safety, Accountability, Fairness, and Equity- Today) ACT into law in February, saying “Transforming the pretrial detention system so low-income people aren’t thrown behind bars while only the wealthy walk free, diverting low-level drug crimes into substance-treatment programs and reducing excessive stays in prison.”
“It denies victims their constitutional rights. And keep this in mind, businesses and homeowners will no longer be able to remove trespassers from your residence or your businesses. Someone could decide to live in your shed, and all we can do is give them a ticket. You have to decide what level of force is required to remove them and whether or not it’s legal.



Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump

I have great lawyers and legal teams, working closely together, to guard against the Greatest Witch Hunt of all times. Many lawyers want to come on board. Prosecutorial misconduct and Weaponization, the likes of which has never been seen before, is taking place at many different Radical left Democrat levels. I don’t know how much more our Country will be willing to withstand? We are living in a very angry and troubled failing Nation. We are, indeed, a Nation in decline!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4EtNmy9HHw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4EtNmy9HHw

14:47 video runtime

Catholic DEMOLISHES John MacArthur on Mary and the Catholic Church
284 views
Sep 18, 2022
49
Dislike
Share
Save
Catholic Truth
44.5K subscribers
Catholic demolishes John MacArthur and his arguments on Mary and the Catholic Church. Pastor John MacArthur knows nothing about Catholicism and misrepresents the Catholic Church in everything he say. We debunk his fallacious claims.

QUESTIONS? Ask us here: https://www.subscribepage.com/e3e8c7

SUPPORT:
Support Monthly via Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/catholictruth
Support Monthly, Yearly or One Time via PayPal: https://thecatholictruth.org/donate/

APOLOGETICS TRAININGS:
Would you like 1-on-1 Apologetics training with Bryan? Or a chance to ask questions or get advice? Contact Catholic Truth: info@theCatholicTruth.org

FOLLOW CATHOLIC TRUTH:
Podcast: https://www.buzzsprout.com/1157177
TikTok: "TheCatholicTruth" - https://www.tiktok.com/@thecatholictr...
Instagram: Catholic_Truth_Official
Our Facebook Page: https://bit.ly/3eDvMO8
Our Facebook Group Page: https://www.facebook.com/groups/catho...
Blog: https://thecatholictruth.org/category...

Need a Speaker or Retreat? https://TheCatholicTruth.org

MERCH: https://thecatholictruth.org/shop/
Like our shirts? Designed by Glorybound Apparel: https://gloryboundco.com/

Online Confirmation Retreat? https://thecatholictruth.org/online-c...

BOOK: Counterfeit Spirituality (Yoga, Reiki, Astrology, Law of Attraction, etc.)
Our Sunday Visitor: https://bit.ly/3vtK63Z
Amazon: https://amzn.to/3e1BqMk
Also see Barnes & Nobles, etc.

BOOK: "WHY Do You Believe In GOD?" https://amzn.to/33iZSk3

Related searches: john macarthur roman catholicism, john macarthur catholicism youtube,

Music Credit: http//www.bensound.comroyalty-free-music

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gcuhDqB0Wk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gcuhDqB0Wk

14:31 video runtime

Development of Doctrine
36 watching now
Premiere in progress. Started 5 minutes ago
25
Dislike
Share
Save
Sensus Fidelium
226K subscribers
Please say 3 Hail Marys for the priest

��������������������������������������
Support Catholic Businesses here - https://sensusfidelium.us/catholicbus...
��������������������������������������

***Donations to Sensus Fidelium is 501(c)3 tax deductible***

����PLEASE HELP OUR CHANNEL GROW ����

▶️ 1. Become a Channel Patron: https://www.patreon.com/SensusFidelium

▶️ 2. Visit the website https://www.sensusfidelium.us for Gueranger, Saint of the Day, Apologetics, Meditation by the Saints, Scripture Study and more.

▶️ 3. Subscribe to Other Video Platforms
�� SensusFidelium.TV - https://sensusfidelium.tv/@SensusFide...
�� BitChute --- https://www.bitchute.com/channel/Sens...
�� Rumble --- https://rumble.com/c/c-298311
�� My Catholic Tube - https://mycatholictube.com/videos/sen...
�� LBRY.tv --- https://lbry.tv/@SensusFidelium:c
�� ODYSEE - https://odysee.com/@SensusFidelium:c
�� UGETube - https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/@S...
�� BrandNewTube - https://brandnewtube.com/@SensusFidelium
�� GabTV - https://tv.gab.com/channel/Sensus_Fid...
�� GloriaTV - https://gloria.tv/Sensus%20Fidelium
�� Brighteon - https://www.brighteon.com/channels/se...

▶️ 4. Paypal, Bitcoin, Anedot, Stripe, Square & PO Box donations - https://sensusfidelium.com/donate-sup...

▶️ 5. YouTube: Click Subscribe, then Click "Notification Bell" = ��
Please "Like" our videos so that Youtube shares it to others by clicking the "Like" thumbs-up under the video = ����

▶️ 6. Please share this video ��, and help others find Christ inside the Catholic Church! Please share this video on Facebook and Twitter using the share button.

▶️ 7. Follow on Social Media:
�� Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SensusFidelium/
�� Twitter: https://https://twitter.com/Sensus_Fidelium
�� YouTube: Click Subscribe, then Click "Notification Bell" = ��
�� Parler: https://parler.com/profile/Sensusfide...
�� SP3RN: https://www.sp3rn.com/community/pages...
�� GAB: https://gab.com/Sensus_Fidelium
�� Bastyon: https://bastyon.com/sensusfidelium
�� GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/sensus_fidelium
�� INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/sensusfidel...
�� Telegram: https//t.me/RealSensusFidelium

▶️ 8. Follow on iTunes:
�� https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...

from the YouTube chat

Dark​Novus Ordo Seclorum ������
Premiere in progress: you're officially one of the first fans to watch this upload. Enjoy this Premiere by watching and chatting with other fans in real-time. Remember to guard your privacy and abide by our community guidelines.