Geocentrism

I think this movie could actually make a difference. Could you imagine the wake-up call if 100,000,000 people around the world start to understand that the universe appears to be aligned to our little planet? This is being indicated by the evidence, and to their current embarrassment, this is what top scientists are saying in the movie. I think they realize how much they said, and the reason this film came under attack is because people are beginning to realize its potential implications. Things are about to start getting pretty hot in regards to this film. It is not fantasy, and that is why some people somewhere are really really worried about its release. Please spread the word if only as a 1st amendment issue, because I assure their will be attempts to stop this film from ever being aired. Regular people, John Q Public and Joe Sixpack, are going to be told that they cannot understand this stuff, and that they need to be protected from seeing it. We need as much exposure as possible over the next month to be sure that our one big chance to get this film out succeeds. You saw what happened to Expelled and The Passion of Christ. One major "Catholic" apologist even threatened to contact "his friends at the Bnai B'rith" about this film. Robert Sungenis has been accused of anti-semitism and was even honored as one of the Dirty Dozen by the SPLC, and he is the executive producer. Rocky Mountain Pictures released both these films also. We do have the best possible group of people on our side (or really their own side, because they will profit, but that is how capitalism works).

Regardless of what you think of the film (and I assure you your view will change once you see it), pleas help spread the word.

I have seen the final cut, and it is awesome. From a pure entertainment value it is AS GOOD or better than Cosmos. In terms of content, it is infinitely better, firstly because it was not a monologue form one scientist, but a dialog between many top scientists, and also and most importantly, they were asked the right questions.

Is the film pro-God or anti-God?

Why would an Atheist be interested in a film about something that cannot be proven, or that they cannot touch?

It's more likely we are in a computer simulation than a "God" existing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shami-Amourae

It's more likely we are in a computer simulation than a "God" existing.

---

Or we are in a computer simulation with "God" existing.

Anything is possible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EE_

Is the film pro-God or anti-God?

Why would an Atheist be interested in a film about something that cannot be proven, or that they can touch?

---

The implications are so pro-God that the atheists are scared of the film. Some of the interviewees state an explicitly pro-God message (including John Hartnett, George Ellis, Ronald Hatch, Robert Sungenis, Robert Bennett, John Byl and Martin Selbrede). The film will also appeal to some new age types because even if they choose not to interpret the evidence in an explicitly Chrtistian manner, they will understand the significance of the the cosmos at its largest scales pointing back to having a spiritual significance. The atheists will be drawn to the film by its cast of characters (Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku, George Ellis, Max Tegmark, Julian Barbour, Bernard Carr) and the smell of controversy. ALL will come away with a fresh perspective on everything.

To me nothing is what is or what could be till it happens, everything changes second to second... stand or be at the wrong place at the wrong time and you could get a bullet or get wrong over by a car.....the fact that you believe does not means that it is........nothing happens till it happens.

In the Congo the Simbas just to carry a JUJU bag around their neck that was supposed to saved them from bullets, if they did die it then meant that they did not believe in their holy man..........the same way that a Christian carry a cross around their neck for "good" luck and to show their belief.

V

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EE_

Or we are in a computer simulation with "God" existing.

Anything is possible.

---

That's true too. God could be a janitor named Joe wearing a VR set (the Universe) on his lunch break for all we know.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnQPublic

The implications are so pro-God that the atheists are scared of the film. Some of the interviewees state an explicitly pro-God message (including John Hartnett, George Ellis, Ronald Hatch, Robert Sungenis, Robert Bennett, John Byl and Martin Selbrede). The film will also appeal to some new age types because even if they choose not to interpret the evidence in an explicitly Chrtistian manner, they will understand the significance of the the cosmos at its largest scales pointing back to having a spiritual significance. The atheists will be drawn to the film by its cast of characters (Lawrence Krauss, Michio Kaku, George Ellis, Max Tegmark, Julian Barbour, Bernard Carr) and the smell of controversy. ALL will come away with a fresh perspective on everything.

---

Someone has to stop this propaganda! There can be no God!

Please God, don't let Ben Stein be in this movie.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Santa

Please God, don't let Ben Stein be in this movie.

---

Nope. No Ben Stein. See, God does give you what you want. :)