Coronavirus

https://www.bitchute.com/video/hv8StWoIne64/

Are Viruses Even a Scientific Theory? - Dr. Sam Bailey


https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...64_320x180.jpg

19:19 video runtime

Dr. Sam Bailey of New Zealand lays out the logical steps of the recent "Virus Challenge" to the orthodox methodologies of "modern virology!"

Source:
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/ar...tific-theory:2


channel image

Jim Fetzer
August 1, 2022

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/ar...tific-theory:2

and

https://drsambailey.com/resources/vi.../virus-debate/

31st July 2022

The “Settling the Virus Debate” statement has already caused a few shockwaves.

In this video we’ll explore:

What the statement actually says
Why virology is not consistent with the scientific method
Circular reasoning fallacies being presented as “evidence”
Dr Mark Bailey’s response to a virologist’s “irrefutable evidence” of SARS-CoV-2


The “Settling the Virus Debate” statement, 14 Jul 2022

https://drsambailey.com/resources/se...-virus-debate/

Interesting discussion pro and con among Steve Kirsch, Alex Berenson (con) and Dr. Pierre Kory M.D.


https://rumble.com/v1d64vr-full-epis...-america..html

Full Episode #39: The Most Dangerous Journalist in America.

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation Published July 21, 2022 18,899 Views


1:50:15 total video runtime

Subject discussion goes from 43:00 to 1:20:50 - about 38 minutes

_________

Dachsie comment:

I think Alex Berenson's main argument was a bit of a straw-man argument - saying it was claimed "Ivermectin will save you from dying."

Ivermectin was never exaggerated any where near that way in anything I heard. It was always presented as something that must be used early on in illness symptoms and it is cheap and well researched and you can get it and it is something you can do that may help you avoid hospitalization.

People were so panicked from the beginning that they did not know what to do and they stopped thinking when they got some mild cold symptoms. At that early point reason and logic were already out the window.

Maybe some people did go on to get more severe symptoms even after trying Ivermectin at home a few days and then they went into the hospital where the hospital "protocols" killed them.

I would also comment that all three men referred to "COVID" as though it were a scientifically identified and testable illness. I questioned that proposition from the beginning.

Dachsie comment:

Congressman Thomas Masse tells it like it is about the Comirnaty bait-and-switch "vaccine" scam.

"This is a crime in progress. "

People are beginning to see that none of the "COVID" "vaccines" were officially fully APPROVED for administration to our military members as well as to the USA public.
There is a law that, at least for the military, the "vaccines" given must be fuilly licensed and APPROVED. Comirnaty was licensed and full approved but was NEVER available or used in the USA.


___________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHtRpzcm6TI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHtRpzcm6TI

5:05 video runtime

7-27-2022

Congressman Thomas Massie 7/27/2022: "Vaccine Does Not Stop Spread of COVID"
15,792 views
Aug 1, 2022
549


RepThomasMassie

9.54K subscribers

Tweet

Citizen Free Press @CitizenFreePres

the best Pfizer ad we've ever seen

embedded video

https://twitter.com/i/status/1554106589954523136

https://twitter.com/i/status/1554106589954523136

From
Zach Vorhies
9:07 AM · Aug 1, 2022·Twitter Web App

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/-co...m_source=email

Coffee & Covid ☙ Wednesday, August 3, 2022

Jeff Childers



As of July 2022, VAERS now includes 45 post-covid-vaccine deaths in children, 60% of which were previously healthy (no comorbidities), and most of which involved blood clots or cardiac arrests. Before covid, any vaccine would have been pulled from the market after 25 to 50 deaths of people of ALL ages, let alone children. Just saying.

VAERS also includes 1,892 other reports of serious adverse events in children, including ER admissions, hospitalizations, permanent disabilities, birth defects, and other life-threatening events.

Corporate media has been completely silent about the pediatric VAERS reports. It’s SO weird that media can’t WAIT to breathlessly report on every other kind of potential threat, except for this one.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....f-f4b3bea1e17f

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv.svg

‘Good Morning CHD’ Episode 92: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Debuts NEW Book

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...teAoEsE20Q--~D

Good Morning CHD: Exclusive Interview With Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. About His New Book ‘A Letter To Liberals’ — 7am PT // 10am ET

Live now but replay at same link.

37:07 video runtime

video will also be viewable on Rumble

_______________

Here is Marc Crispin Miller's comment about this new book.

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email

Calling all (real) liberals: Please come home! America now needs you more than ever!
In the spirit of his father and his uncle, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s new book calls on liberals to say NO to the totalitarian censorship that has put democracy, and science, at grave risk
Mark Crispin Miller
20 hr ago

My blurb for Bobby Kennedy’s new book:

“Where have all the liberals gone, and how were they replaced by a Bizarro ‘left’ promoting militant obedience to government decree, total state surveillance, universal segregation in the name of ‘public health,’ and—above all—iron censorship of every dissident opinion, every inconvenient fact? However it happened, this vast perversion of ‘the left’ has had a catastrophic impact on both science and democracy, both of which require free speech and free inquiry, as all creatures need to breathe; and so we must make every effort to restore that liberal legacy—as we may start to do by sharing this brave, lucid little book with everyone we know who's still regurgitating bits of COVID propaganda. Whether they might benefit from this essential book (as millions have been wakened by The Real Anthony Fauci) is, finally, up to them; but it is up to us to tell them that it's here (since ‘our free press’ won't do it).”
—Mark Crispin Miller, professor of media studies at New York University; editor, News from Underground


Dachsie comment:

The USA is NOT a democracy. Our elected representatives are referred to as democratically elected.

The USA is a constitutional republic with democratically elected representatives of the people.

All political parties have failed.
We no longer have the rule of law.
We no longer have any semblance of honest fair elections process.

Please watch the film I linked to earlier today from LifeSiteNews titled "Doomed to Repeat It"

It gives first-hand account of how communist Fidel Castro managed to take over Cuba. JFK said in 1960 “splinter the CIA in a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds” and that was said before the 1961 Bay of Pigs CIA treason.

Democracy is "two wolves and a sheep deciding on what's for dinner"

______________________

Dachsie Comment # 2:

You can get a free pdf electronic copy of RFK,Jr.'s new book HERE.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/e...r-to-liberals/

It arrives in your SPAM folder of your email program. You have to move the spam item to your full regular inbox. Then and only then can you click on "Please Download Now" button and have it actually work to do the download. The Spam folder copy is not backed by the full URL but the Inbox folder copy does work.

I could share the full pdf download URL but I do not think it would be right to do that.

Mr. Kennedy seemed to say that his reason for writing this book/letter was that conservatives and liberals could begin to communicate with each other effectively and peacefully and still remain friends. I interpret that to mean just learn listening skills and ask questions at first and do not make any declarative statements / judgements. Just present yourself as trying to understand the reasons for the other person's ideas but withhold stating declaratory sentences until you feel you fully really understand. That is basically what we call "dialoging" or "dialoging to consensus." Dachsie has been there and done that and I still do not understand much of anything. Maybe it would help if I were a true "conservative."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlYdJLj3TLI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlYdJLj3TLI

Kim Iversen: Why I'm No Longer On The Hill's Rising

6:11 video runtime

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pBAZKanoF0GO/

https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...GO_320x180.jpg

Dr Mike Yeadon - Fraud, Fear and How Herd Mentality Has Brought Us to the Edge



First published at 17:44 UTC on August 3rd, 2022.

Jim Fetzer

THIS IS GREAT!!! The great (former Pfizer VP Chief Science Officer) whistleblower, Dr. Mike Yeadon, comes out saying that the people who’ve been saying that are no infectious viruses are CORRECT! Mike Yeadon’s specific statement saying that there are no infectious viruses is at the 14-minute mark of this video:

Source: https://rumble.com/v1ee8yv-dr-mike-y...-the-edge.html

Starting at the 14-minute mark:

“The powers that be — I’ll call them the perpetrators — the people who are running this global crime — it’s a global crime to take over all of humanity — they pretended that there’s a serious new respiratory, viral global health threat. That’s what they did, this virus in Wuhan. In my opinion there never any new health threat whatsoever. Part of the [criminal] beauty of this is that it can’t go wrong because there are no moving parts. The only moving part is the PCR test. So the initial thing was an exaggerated health threat.

“Some people believe that there’s a new virus and if so then it’s not any more serious than any influenza, not really. Because flu vanished at the same time by “sheer coincidence.” Personally, I’ve come to the conclusion — and I will credit [Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman] and their colleagues — I had a really good chat with those guys early in 2020 and it bothered me, bothered me, bothered me. And over time I realized that I could no longer maintain my understanding of respiratory viruses as I thought I knew them. And then I learned a new bit of information recently and it collapsed the possibility that respiratory viruses as described exist at all — THEY DON’T.

“People do get ill. People get exactly the same illnesses as before that horrible Yeadon says viruses don’t exist — they still have “colds” and “flu” but I don’t think we know what causes them, but they’re not [caused by] respiratory viruses.”

~ Dr. Mike Yeadon
________________________________________

"they don't work

they were never needed

and they're dangerous "

53:30

Dachsie comment:

Dr. Michael Yeadon is spending his retirement telling the truth to save lives and expose this massive evil of the "PLANdemic."

He is of high personal character and admits that respiratory viruses as he understood them may not exist. He is not denying that some people are getting sick and some are getting very sick but he honestly tells us that we do not know exactly what is causing this sickness.

I understood Dr. Yeadon to say that the "COVID" illness that people are getting could be thought of a case of the flu that is accompanied by severe symptoms in some people but not in all, and that the cause of the this flu is unknown to him and no pathogen has been scientifically identified to be associated with it.

I remember doctors in training used to refer to the flu as the "the uppers" or "the lowers" meaning upper respiratory symptoms or lower intestinal symptoms. Seems to me that if "the flu" were one scientifically identified pathogen it would not act on the different parts of the body in completely different ways, but I am not a scientist or a doctor and I operate with a simplistic set of unknown unknowns.

https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/...m_source=email

The Steve Kirsch debate about the existence of the virus

Jon Rappoport

August 4, 2022

Let me be clear. I’m speaking for myself here, as a reporter who says SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’m not speaking for Andrew Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowan, Christine Massey, Sam Bailey, or anyone else who has come to the same conclusion.

OK. Steve Kirsch frames the debate (see also here) this way: There are a set of facts about COVID you can lay on the table. Then you decide which hypothesis best explains those facts.

In his case, he chooses: “SARS-CoV-2 exists.”

This approach is an elementary mistake.

I’m not challenging any hypothesis. I’m ATTACKING A STRAIGHT-OUT LABORATORY PROCEDURE.

My attack is on the level of: “You poured the liquid from beaker A into beaker B. Wrong. You should have poured it into beaker C.”

Virologists employ a lab procedure to discover a virus they’ve never seen before. They claim this procedure ISOLATES the virus from all the surrounding material in a soup they create. I say their procedure doesn’t produce that result at all. Period.

I say there is no isolation.

That’s it in a nutshell.

Arguing about hypotheses is entirely beside the point.

But I will write a few words on that subject, just to clear the air.

If a real scientist laid a whole collection of facts on the table, he would then do a hard examination of each one, to make sure it is a true fact. When satisfied, he might sit and think and ask himself, “What hypothesis would explain these facts?”

Let’s say he comes up with one. That’s just the beginning of doing actual science. Why? Because the only scientific value of a hypothesis is its ability to PREDICT.

And by that I mean, MAKE A SPECIFIC AND VERY USEFUL PREDICTION THAT CAN BE VERIFIED OR DENIED BY ACTUAL EXPERIMENT.

Claiming a hypothesis which explains a set of facts as a reason to pop champagne corks signals a gross misconception about what science is.

Forming a debate on that basis would be futile, irrelevant, and a waste of time.

Share

Finally, for now, carrying out a debate on video may impart useful information to viewers, but there is a reason why medical and science journals stubbornly persist in presenting studies as words on the page---as opposed to having the authors dress up and describe their work on camera instead.

Words on the page are much better.

They allow other scientists, journalists, and civilians to go over a study very carefully, phrase by phrase. They allow other scientists to REPLICATE the authors’ work, in order to discover whether the results and conclusions stand up.

Of course, in this “fast moving world, with people on the go, living the active lifestyle,” we should perhaps adopt Easier and Quicker as the mode of scientific decision-making.

“OK, Fred, are the cameras set up, are we ready to roll? Are all the debaters online? Have you got the poll screen in place, so the viewers can vote and decide what’s science and what isn’t when we’re done?”

I’m breathless with anticipation.

On the other hand, if we have “a panel of independent experts” on hand to make that ruling, we can rent them out, in the future, to The New England Journal and The Lancet. Yes, a roving panel making all sorts of judgment calls. They’ll spice up science, which is badly in need of instant melodrama and boffo box office.

Hell, let’s make this debate a game show.

“Great idea, Jim. A couple of tall models in bikinis walking around with big signs, and a host like, oh, Chris Wallace or that guy who keeps talking about laying down a bet for a million dollars. What’s his name? Kirsch. Steve Kirsch.”

Stevie, baby, nobody cares about your money. Nobody cares about your million dollars.

-- Jon Rappoport

(Episode 17 of Rappoport Podcasts -- "Solving the Tanking Economy; Plus: The Current Debate about the Existence of the 'COVID virus'" -- is now posted. It's a blockbuster. To listen, click here. To learn more about This Episode of Rappoport Podcasts, click here.)

Jon also writes at NoMoreFakeNews.com and OutsideTheRealityMachine.com

Follow Jon on Twitter and Gab: @jonrappoport