Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
reprinted @ VT, though Faurison wrote the piece 8 months ago:
Extermination camps – When the Khazars Punked the World – Dr. Robert Faurisson
By Jim W. Dean, Managing Editor on August 7, 2015
In 70 years, no forensic study proving the existence and operation of the “Nazi gas chambers”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont...eport_logo.jpgFred Leuchter was destroyed for his testimony on the remains of the fumigation rooms, which every camp had
Robert Faurisson, Ph.D.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-cont...-3-300x188.jpgOften a treatment of researchers who try to get truth out
[ Editor’s note: We have not run much holocaust material, as our VT readers are familiar with all aspects of the story. But we have to remind ourselves that we have new readers who may not be. When the early revisionists first began peeling the onion on this story, it was not against the law to “ask questions” about it.
But Europe, occupied Canada, and Australia have criminalized what they call “denying the holocaust”. This in itself is a hoax because in Germany the courts had to invent a “truth is no defense” new judicial concept to block those charged from being able to submit archival evidence in support of their challenges.
The legal reasoning went like this: “You are charged with having challenged the ‘official truth’ of WWII which the law states cannot not be legally challenged, but even a felony to do so. Therefore all the prosecutor has to prove is that you made statements or published material to that effect to sustain his charges. Whether the material you wish to submit confirms your position has no bearing on defeating the charge because truth is no ‘defense’.”
This concept entered the canons of Western jurisprudence without a whimper from the international judicial community anywhere. When I would ask Americans what they thought about Germany’s “Truth is no defense” laws, no one knew anything about them, plus… they thought I was pulling their leg.
more: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/08...ert-faurisson/
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Fetzer made hay of this recent radio appearance on the show of host Clive Lewis. Fetzer's making the rounds pimping his book, "So I Guess We Didn't Go To The Moon, Either?!" It summarizes about a 1/2 dozen big hoaxes, incl the apollos, holohoax, bin laden, sandy hoax, boston hoaxathon; and maybe one or two others I forgot.
Clyde Lewis' show touts itself as conspiracy-centric, but then when Fetz gets to the holohoax portion of his book, Lewis flips out and it becomes a big cross-talk fest where neither can be heard clearly. Then Lewis hangs up on Fetz during a break, sooner than the remainder of the show when Fetz was supposed to be on. The last portion of the show is Lewis and a couple callers laying on the ad-hom ridicule smears directed at Fetz who wasn't there to defend.... but of course, not touching any of the damning holohoax truth evidence outside of citing the usual BS hearsay accounts of peeps they knew who survived 16/whatever gassings.
If you're curious to listen, I'm only aware of this soundcloud page; no mp3 link.
To listen to the show, click here for the audio recording
Advance the player to about the middle, where you hear Fetzer speaking, coz the first hour or whatever is Lewis babbling solo; talking a lot without saying anything of interest.
Here's the article JF published a couple days after,
Ground Zero with Clyde Lewis: Conspiracy for Republicans
- Aug 02, 2015
http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/...85c0abf_XL.jpg
by Jim Fetzer
Having done thousands of interviews about JFK, 9/11, Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, JADE HELM and the Holocaust, among other matters, it came as no surprise when I was invited to appear on "Ground Zero with Clyde Lewis", which is broadcast over 200 stations across the nation. His producer, Ron Patton, sent me a link to his opening monologue, which I thought was very good. Here's part of our exchange:
more:
http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/...or-republicans
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Promising topic for a ziostream media (BBC) talk show; but as you might guess.... rigged to produce the right impressions. I haven't watched the 1 hour show; just going by B.Martinez' review.
Holocaustianity on the march
Brandon Martinez August 7, 2015 Commentary, Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwRdLCUJ_rg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwRdLCUJ_rg
When perusing YouTube last night, I came across a curious episode of the BBC debate show “The Big Questions.” The topic of this one was “Is it time to lay the Holocaust to rest?” It featured a coterie of Zionist Jews on one end and a dilapidated kosher-opposition on the other who shuddered in fear of the aggressive, hubristic Judeo-Nazis arguing that the “Holocaust” should be memorialized and commemorated until the end of time. To those in-the-know on the Jewish question, this show will inevitably produce one of two effects: it will either make you vomit out of disgust at the insane narcissism of the Jewish participants, or it will cause you to seethe with anger that such obviously demented people are given such a prominent voice in the media to promote their toxic supremacist viewpoints.
The Jewish panelists on the show endeavored to convince everyone that the “Holocaust” is a “unique” and “exceptional” event in history that has no equivalents. This claim is erroneous because all major historical events have some unique elements to them, so the same could be said about the Rwandan genocide, the Armenian genocide, Soviet-Communist atrocities, the Israeli-sponsored slow motion genocide of the Palestinians and other outrages. Despite their protestations to the contrary, those Jews who advance the alleged uniqueness and exceptionality of the Holocaust do so not because it was such in practice, but because they view its victims as unique and exceptional; they are, in essence, Jewish supremacists who believe Jewish casualties carry more weight than others, that Jewish blood has more worth than the blood of non-Jews. They pathetically tried to eschew such allegations on the BBC show, but their ethno-supremacist inferences are plain and obvious to those who can decipher Talmudic doublespeak. The former head of the Zionist-oriented Anti-Defamation League, Abraham Foxman, perfectly encapsulated this Judeo-supremacist notion when he said:
“The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like its direct opposite, which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with the Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation.”
From the Jewish vantage point, it’s obvious why they wish to elevate the Holocaust narrative to sacrosanct, cult-like status, and to keep it there for all eternity. It supremely serves the Jewish-Zionist interest to have the Gentile masses genuflecting at the altar of Jewish victimology. As Norman Finkelstein argues in his book The Holocaust Industry, the Holocaust story serves to bolster Jewish economic and political privilege and works simultaneously to subdue forces opposed to that privilege. In other words, it is a weaponized mechanism of Jewish power and advancement, wielded like a sledgehammer against opponents of Zionism and Jewish ethnic supremacism in our world; it works to shame and stigmatize all criticism of Jews, Israel and their malevolent actions. A former Israeli minister once said that invoking the Holocaust as well as the “anti-Semite” canard are deceptive “tricks” designed to stifle debate about Jewish-Zionist atrocities in Palestine and their disproportionate power in the West. Who in their right mind can disagree?
more: http://nonalignedmedia.com/2015/08/h...-on-the-march/
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
@ fetzer's blog:
Wednesday, August 5, 2015
What about the Holocaust witnesses? The Zundel Trials (1985 and 1988)
by Robert Faurisson
On May 13, 1988, Ernst Zündel was sentenced by Judge Ronald Thomas of the District Court of Ontario, in Toronto, to nine months in prison for having distributed a Revisionist booklet that is now 14 years old: Did Six Million Really Die?
Ernst Zündel lives in Toronto where, up until a few years ago, he worked as a graphic artist and advertising man. He is now 49 years old. A native of Germany, he has kept his German citizenship.
[Editor's note: Images have been added here for republication. I personally interviewed Ernst Zundel on "The Real Deal" (August 3, 2012), which you can listen to here: the Zundel interview.]
His life has known serious upsets from the day when, in about 1981, he began to distribute Did Six Million Really Die?, a Revisionist booklet by Richard Harwood.
The booklet was first published in 1974 in Great Britain where, a year later, it was the focus of a lengthy controversy in the literary journal Books and Bookmen. At the instigation of the Jewish community of South Africa, it was later banned in that country.
In Canada, during an earlier trial in 1985, Zündel had been sentenced to 15 months in prison. That sentence was thrown out in 1987. A new trial began on January 18, 1988. I participated in the preparations for it and in the unfolding of those judicial proceedings. I devoted thousands of hours to the defense of Ernst Zündel.
more: http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015...es-zundel.html
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
first free hour @ Red Ice:
Eric Hunt - Hour 1 - The Shoah: The Biggest Hoax of the 20th Century?
August 12, 2015
Eric Hunt is a filmmaker whose documentaries include “The Last Days of the Big Lie,” “The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax,” and “The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth.” Hunt is with us to talk about the important research and work he has contributed in exposing the “greatest hoax of human history.” He has not only examined the “testimonies” and “evidence” of the so-called extermination program of the National Socialists in Germany during the 1930s/40s, but has also studied the propaganda that has been released to perpetuate this story.
Eric talks about the ever-changing death toll numbers at Treblinka and Majdanek, and he points to other serious holes in the official narrative where gas chambers disguised as shower rooms are credited for the homicide of millions. We get into the specifics of disinfection facilities that were using Zyklon B to deal with the deadly typhoid epidemic that was sweeping through war-torn Europe, and evidence that suggests Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibór were not extermination camps, but rather work camps and transfer stations created to generate manpower and deal with the disease and violence of wartime.
In the members’ hour, Eric touches on the methodology of wartime propaganda and the media monopoly that has existed since pre-WWI. We explore the horrific emotional garbage that is fed through the mainstream to perpetuate rumors of human lampshades and soap, fire pits of babies, and a Hitler that wanted a world of blue-eyed and blond-haired slaves, among other ridiculous atrocities. Later, Eric details his film, “The Treblinka Archaeology Hoax,” which debunks the British Zionist archaeologist Caroline Sturdy Colls’ fraudulent “investigation” of Treblinka. We end with a look at more of the indoctrinated guilt related to past deeds of Europeans that continues to be exploited for the reinforcement of new wars waged on behalf of Israel.
___________________
Also, at JFriend's:
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...oax-90x90.jpeg Dutch Rabbi Demands Official Apology for “Holocaust Complicity”
August 9, 2015 4 comments
http://therealistreport.com/wp-conte...bbi-90x90.jpeg Jewish Man Caught Spray Painting Swastikas & Making “anti-Semitic” Threatening Phone Calls
August 9, 2015 5 comments
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Robbie Martin Stands By Zionist-Shielding Disinfo
Brandon Martinez August 17, 2015 Commentary http://nonalignedmedia.com/wp-conten...ie-martins.jpg
Non-Aligned Media
Brandon Martinez
August 17, 2015
After viewing my exposé of his erroneous assertion that the neocons are not really Zionists, the alternative media gatekeeper Robbie Martin has hardened his stance, calling my rebuttal ‘reverse Hasbara’ without addressing a single point raised.
Likely at the behest of his sister Abby, he also took a shot at “Holocaust deniers.”
He initially challenged me to a debate on the neocon subject, which I accepted, but he then quickly backed out.
Like most left-wing gatekeepers, Martin’s impetus appears to be to try to set up narrow parameters for what constitutes “legitimate criticism of Israel”, and then once these barriers have been established, dismissing anything that goes beyond his watered down analysis as off-limits, heretical and “discrediting”.
Their hypocritical use of the pejorative “Holocaust denial” is a testament to the dishonesty of the Martin siblings. While they label anyone who asks legitimate questions about the victors’ interpretation of the Second World War and the Holocaust narrative “deniers,” they concurrently decry the mainstream media’s use of the term “conspiracy theorist” to discredit dissenters and skeptics of government narratives.
They could easily be labeled “9/11 deniers” by mainstream shills for refusing to adhere to the official mythology surrounding that event, but they would again complain about the mainstream’s wielding of such dishonest language. But they’re allowed to do it against people they disagree with.
The Martins are all about appealing to the quasi-alternative left-wing gatekeeper media spearheaded by Amy Goodman, Noam Chomsky, Max Blumenthal and other Jewish exceptionalists masquerading as dissidents.
On her Russia Today show, Abby would usually bring on anti-Zionist Jews to discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (Max Blumental, Miko Peled, Noam Chomsky, etc.), thereby ensuring that Jews are able to set the parameters of the discourse on an issue of special interest to Jews. While those Jews do some good work and seem respectable, allowing them to lead the charge in dissension against Israel is ultimately a clever game which entails only broadcasting kosher voices who will not cross a number of designated ‘red lines’ that jeopardize certain sacrosanct Zionist narratives. The Holocaust and Israeli involvement in 9/11 top the list of no-go topics. True-to-form, Abby and her brother frantically suppress any discussion of those issues.
The Martins and others on the gate-kept Left exist to enforce those Zionist-designated red lines and villainize anyone brave enough to tackle the ultimate taboos.
On certain issues of the day such as corporate corruption, US military adventurism, the environment, the police state, and even Israel’s crimes against Palestinians, the Martins are clearly superior to the reprobate mainstream media. But on issues relating to Zionism, Jewish power, the Second World War, etc., they are not trustworthy, and indeed have proven deceptive on those critical subjects.
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Jeremy Corbyn Bows to Holocaustianity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_Jaw_pJq50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_Jaw_pJq50
Brandon Martinez August 17, 2015 Commentary, News, Video Non-Aligned Media
Brandon Martinez
August 17, 2015
The Zionists have been running a sustained smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn, the British politician contending for leadership of the Labour Party in that country.
Zionist-controlled media outlets have made a big deal about Corbyn once calling Hezbollah and Hamas ‘friends,’ and now they’ve tried to link him with a Holocaust revisionist (a “denier” in mainstream parlance).
As to be expected, Corbyn has succumbed to the pressure, disavowing any connection to the revisionist Paul Eisen, and denouncing Holocaust revisionism as “vile and wrong.”
Corbyn, in a desperate bid to mitigate the sustained Zionist media attack, has affirmed the exceptionality of the “Holocaust,” calling it the most “vile part of our history.” “The Jewish people that were killed in the Nazi Holocaust were the people who suffered the most in the 20th century,” he added.
Corbyn’s capitulation to Holocaustianity is unsurprising. He is a weak left-winger who could never mount a true revolution against Zionist power. The Zionists dislike him because he doesn’t support the slow-motion genocide of the Palestinains, and that’s enough for them to seek his demise.
Other left-wingers like George Galloway have not only affirmed the false exceptionality of the Holocaust but have called for all skeptics and doubters of the narrative to be thrown in jail. This is a standard compromise that pro-Palestinian politicians like Galloway and Corbyn make – they somewhat challenge Zionist power in far-away Palestine, but not in their home countries. They eschew the Zionist agenda in the Middle East, but uphold many aspects of that agenda on the home-front.
Corbyn and Galloway are better than most of the unrepentant sabbath goys that plague the Western establishment, but they are simply not good enough. Their old-age and weak physical stature make them a poor choice for leadership in the struggle against Zionist totalitarianism. Galloway’s alleged degenerate sexual habits also make him a prime target for blackmail.
Left-wing controlled opposition like Galloway and Corbyn is not the answer.
2 comments http://nonalignedmedia.com/2015/08/j...locaustianity/
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Israeli diplomat: We want Germany to have guilty feelings over the HoloHoax™ so it can help Israel
From Haaretz
http://davidduke.com/wp-content/uplo...l-500x281.jpeg
In off-the-record comment to journalists, embassy spokeswoman Adi Farjon said Israel had no interest in full normalization of relations with Germany.A spokeswoman for the Israeli embassy in Berlin recently told Israeli journalists it was in the country’s interest to maintain German guilt about the Holocaust, and that it isn’t seeking full normalization of relations between the governments.Embassy spokeswoman Adi Farjon made the comments in a closed briefing session with journalists at the embassy.“We were all in shock,” said a female journalist present at the briefing. “The spokeswoman clearly said it was an Israeli interest to maintain German guilt feelings. She even said that without them, we’d be just another country as far as they’re concerned.”Others present at the event confirmed the journalist’s account.Some added that the Israeli ambassador himself, Yakov Hadas-Handelsman, was present for some of the briefing, as were other embassy workers who don’t speak Hebrew. Another journalist commented, “It was so awkward. We couldn’t believe our ears. We’re sitting there eating peanuts, and behind the spokeswoman there are two German women sitting there who don’t understand a word of Hebrew – and the embassy staff is telling us they’re working to preserve the German guilt feelings and that Israel has no interest in normalization of relations between the two countries.”The Israeli foreign ministry denied the allegations and said the diplomat were falsely accused of saying these things.This year is a special one for the German and Israeli governments, with Berlin and Jerusalem marking 50 years since the start of diplomatic relations between the two countries. German support for Israel also appears to be at an all-time high – particularly in light of Israel’s ongoing battles with the European Union over labeling of products from West Bank settlements and its troubled diplomatic standing in the world.
This week, as part of the 50th-anniversary celebrations, Bundestag President Norbert Lammert visited Israel. In his speech to the Knesset on Wednesday, Lammert said that the “intensive friendship between our two countries is a historic miracle.” In his speech, Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein praised the special and extraordinary” relations of the two countries, calling Germany “a true friend of Israel.”
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomac...emium-1.662962
