Coronavirus

https://beckernews.com/edit-governme...ng-data-46490/

https://beckernews.com/wp-content/up...IH-930x620.jpg

U.S. Government Deleted Covid-19 Data at Behest of Chinese Researchers. Now, a Judge Has Ordered NIH to Turn Over Missing Docs

by Kyle Becker August 19, 2022


The National Institutes of Health (NIH) deleted COVID-19 gene sequences that may have proven valuable to detecting earlier the probability the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated at the Wuhan lab, as was discovered in June 2021.


Now, U.S. district court judge Leonie Brinkema is ordering the NIH to turn over the missing data related to a probe by the group Empower Oversight. The NIH had earlier submitted a motion for summary judgment, which was denied.


“In Empower Oversight’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the Eastern District of Virginia, Empower Oversight has filed its opposition to NIH’s motion for summary judgment. In its motion, the NIH sought to evade accountability for violations of its legal obligations to disclose documents under FOIA,” the group stated in July. “According to Empower Oversight’s filing, NIH improperly withheld information gathered in response to questions from Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.). Last year, the Senators asked about the agency’s decision to delete coronavirus genetic sequence information from an NIH database at the request of Chinese researchers. NIH has already admitted in the lawsuit that it failed to meet deadlines required by FOIA in responding to Empower Oversight’s request.”


“The NIH has flouted deadlines and ignored its legal obligations to be transparent with Congress and the public,” said Jason Foster, Founder and President of Empower Oversight. “The agency gathered answers to the Senators’ specific factual question but did not transmit them, and then it blacked-out entire paragraphs rather than disclose the information pursuant to our FOIA request,.”

https://wethepatriotsusa.org/breakin...ectin-lawsuit/

https://wethepatriotsusa.org/breakin...ectin-lawsuit/


BREAKING: MINNESOTA FEDERAL JUDGE GRANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN BILL SALIER IVERMECTIN LAWSUIT


https://wethepatriotsusa.org/wp-cont...ng-768x509.png

A federal judge in Minnesota today granted the motions to dismiss filed by Walmart and Hy-Vee Supermarkets, in the lawsuit funded by We The Patriots USA on behalf of Bill and Karla Salier. Bill, a retired U.S. Marine who served valiantly in Somalia and at Camp David, attempted to get a prescription for ivermectin filled at both Walmart and Hy-Vee after he and his wife became seriously ill with COVID-19 last year. After pharmacists at both stores denied him, he resorted to using horse paste for treatment. After they recovered, Bill turned to We The Patriots USA for help, which funded the lawsuit that was filed earlier this year.

We are not surprised by this decision, especially given the hostility that has been shown to patients across the country who dare to seek treatment that does not conform to the narrative propagated by the mainstream medical establishment mob. In our view, there are a lot of problems with Judge Patrick Schiltz’s decision, but here are some highlights:

“The Saliers have asserted various tort claims related to Walmart’s and Hy‐Vee’s refusals to fill the Saliers’ prescriptions for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, two drugs that the Saliers wanted to use to treat their COVID‐19 infections, even though virtually every medical and governmental authority to address the issue has said that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine should not be used to treat COVID‐19.”

– Judge Schiltz, Bill Salier et al. v. Walmart et al.

This is a major problem with the American judicial system, one we have highlighted time and again over the years. When the authority of the PERSON is asserted over the authority of the EVIDENCE, the court substitutes lofty titles and educational credentials for actual scientific data. It is irrelevant how many so-called “authorities” have said ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are dangerous or ineffective to treat COVID-19. The evidence shows otherwise. Until we stop elevating public health authorities over the authority of real, scientific evidence, justice will not be served.

“The implications of recognizing the right asserted by the Saliers—not just the right to do whatever you want with your own body, but the right to force others to help you (so much for their right of self‐determination)—would be mind‐boggling, even if it were just limited to medical providers. If a pharmacist at Walmart is legally required to fill a prescription for ivermectin because the patient demands it, then is every doctor in Minnesota legally required to provide an abortion if a patient demands it? Is every nurse legally required to assist a patient in committing suicide?”

– Judge Schiltz, Bill Salier et al. v. Walmart et al.

First of all, the Saliers were not “demanding” or “forcing” the pharmacists to do anything. They were simply requesting that the pharmacist do his job, i.e., fill a prescription ordered for them by a duly licensed physician. Moreover, the fact that the judge would compare a patient requesting that a pharmacist fill his doctor’s prescription to a patient demanding that his doctor commit murder, is utterly reprehensible. A more appropriate comparison would be a doctor refusing to provide medical treatment to a patient bleeding on the ground in front of him. This was a refusal of a pharmacist to provide life-saving treatment, not life-taking treatment. By substituting their judgments for the judgment of the Saliers’ physician, the pharmacists were practicing medicine without a license, a practice apparently endorsed by the court today.

REST ASSURED, WE WILL BE APPEALING THIS DECISION. The medical rights of every individual in this country are at stake, and we will not back down. Please be on the lookout for updates not only here, but on our Telegram channel. Please also consider a donation to our organization, so we can continue to take on many more battles like this from coast to coast. We won’t win every case, and that’s why we need to file as many as possible! Most of all, we ask that you please keep us (and the Saliers) in your prayers.

SUPPORT OUR MISSION

We the Patriots USA, Inc. | 5210 Cleveland Blvd. Bldg. 140, Suite 222, Caldwell, ID 83607

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQBYAjmiLIQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQBYAjmiLIQ

Unvaccinated Workers Win $10 MILLION Settlement In Federal Court Over Mandate


Premiered 3 hours ago August 19, 2022

11:21 video runtime
7.3K

Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov

�� George Soros Buyout of Spanish Media Outlets �� https://ept.ms/RepelingSorosTakeoverRM

Resources:

�� Sekur:

https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul

�� Epoch TV:

https://ept.ms/RepelingSorosTakeoverRM

�� $10M Settlement:

https://ept.ms/3pxvZKa

�� Settlement Details:

https://ept.ms/3K52WXX

�� Air Force Case:

https://ept.ms/3dLaEKI

Irritating, vexing, disgusting and I guess "woke" journalism.

How many "died unexpectedly" news items have we read about when the main important question interested readers want to know is something journalists used to at least say a few words about in an obituary - cause of death, but glaringly omit now? That is the glaring question everyone has. Did this young woman who "died unexpectedly" get the "COVID" "vaccine" recently?

Greg Hunter of USA watchdog commented on this phenomena in a recent weekly news wrap-up he did and that I posted in this thread, and Dachsie has also.

Search in this thread on the name Casten. HERE is the search results.

The U S Congressman and father whose young daughter "died unexpectedly" and the congressman and the obituaries went on and on about what a wonderful beloved family member the deceased person was but not one word about the glaringly omitted cause of death which they are hiding when they ought to be screaming the probable truth from the housetops.

All we want is the TRUTH. These damn Satanically murderous evil and death-dealing "COVID" "Vaccines" need to be halted NOW . All these vaccines do is what Satan specializes in ...

LIE

MURDER

STEAL

DESTROY.

___________________

Here's the article. Read and be made ill.

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2022/the-burial-of-a-young-mother

August 19, 2022

The Burial of a Young Mother

Austin Ruse

(The only thing I know about Crisis magazine is that it is a neocon fake "Catholic" publication that has been rightly lambasted by E. Michael Jones for decades.)

https://www.crisismagazine.com/wp-co...34-660x350.jpg

Audio reading of the article available at site.


______

Here is a brief summary of this news story from

"THE BURIAL OF A YOUNG MOTHER Mary Teller unexpectedly took ill and died just nine months after giving birth to her second child — and only five years after her wedding. She was 26. Austin Ruse attended the funeral Mass and saw things there that he says he will “ponder and ponder,” including a crowd of joyful mourners too great to count, and a miracle. Read Ruse’s beautiful reflection on death, life, family, and faith here. SHARE"

Source: CatholicVote.org Daily email newsletter. August 20, 2022, The Loop

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/p...m_source=email

Podiatrist: Death and devastating injuries linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine in 80% of elderly patients

A podiatrist contacted Wayne Allyn Root to disclose his personal experience. He had to keep his identity confidential because he doesn't want to lose his license. What he said is absolutely stunning.

Steve Kirsch
1 hr ago August 20, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1500x1001.jpeg



Podiatrist: Death and devastating injuries linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine in 80% of elderly patients

A podiatrist contacted Wayne Allyn Root to disclose his personal experience. He had to keep his identity confidential because he doesn't want to lose his license. What he said is absolutely stunning.

Steve Kirsch
Aug 20

Comment

Share

4 Ways To Find The Best Podiatrist - The Pink Velvet Blog


Check out this story: Finally, One Honest Doctor Comes Forward to Report the Death and Devastating Injuries Linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine.

Do I believe the story? Yes.

I’ve asked Wayne for the contact info of the doctor to verify the story, but I have no reason to doubt it at this point. Why would he risk his license to make up a story like this with such detail? The name of the podiatrist isn’t even revealed. It’s not for fame, not for business. Maybe he’s just malicious, but that seems unlikely. But as I said, I’ll reach out to validate it.

According to Wayne, his podiatrist sees about 80 patients a week. That’s more than enough for strong statistical significance over 20 months (over 5,000 patients) especially with such a large effect size. 95% are vaccinated.

Wayne reports that the podiatrist sees unprecedented rates of injury and death since the vaccines rolled out. He estimates that 80% of his vaccinated elderly are worse off and there is no significant change for his unvaccinated patients.

This isn’t “bad luck” because the p-values are too small to be just “bad luck.” I used Julia’s HypothesisTests library to calculate it and the chance of this happening by bad luck is less than 1e-99. That is the power of a single anecdote. But there are likely hundreds of similar anecdotes with extremely strong p-values. Are they all wrong? It’s very unlikely especially when we aren’t able to find a single anecdote showing the opposite.
All these death and injury reports will be treated by the medical community as anecdotes

Until the medical boards allow doctors to speak out without fear of retribution, these stories will never be published in medical journals and will all be just “anecdotes” that the medical community will ignore.

One doctor asked me “if his story is true, why doesn’t he publish it?”

This shows how naïve doctors are. They think if they submit it to a journal, the journal will publish it and the medical boards will praise the doctor. Neither is true.

In fact, it was the medical boards themselves that told the journal to retract the Lyons-Weiler paper.
“Telling the truth” is not protected speech in medicine: it can lead to license revocation in every state in the US

The HHS agencies, the AMA, the medical journals, or the medical community could speak out about this abuse by the medical boards. They could say that doctors who tell the truth should never be retaliated against.

Not a single doctor or mainstream medical association would dare do that.

Maybe Vinay Prasad might call for this, but he hasn’t AFAIK.

The view of all these people is that it is a state matter and if the states want to punish doctors for telling the truth about what they observe, this is 100% OK with them.

The bottom line is this:

telling the truth about what you observe is NOT protected speech in medicine. It can and will get you retaliated against.

The social media companies, HHS agencies, hospitals, lawmakers, and medical boards all believe it is their duty to silence doctors who tell the truth if what they say goes against the popular narrative.
Summary

Paul Thomas and Andrew Wakefield spoke the truth about what they observed: their reputations and careers were destroyed.

That is how science works today: if you find evidence that disagrees with mainstream opinion, if you don’t keep your mouth shut, you will pay the price for the rest of your life.

“Telling the truth” is not an acceptable defense to a medical license revocation proceeding. No doctor has the courage to speak out against the medical boards seeking retribution against doctors who simply report what they observe. Can you find any op-ed anywhere calling for protection of doctors who speak the truth?

People who tell the truth must be silenced.

Why? Because the medical community cannot explain anecdotes like this one. If the podiatrist isn’t lying, something is causing this, and it is 100% correlated with vaccination.

So if it isn’t the vaccine, what is it?

The medical community doesn’t know and they don’t want to know because it would make them look bad for pushing the vaccine.

Is it any wonder why this doctor is afraid to speak publicly?

https://www.creators.com/read/wayne-...vid-19-vaccine


Finally, One Honest Doctor Comes Forward to Report the Death and Devastating Injuries Linked to the COVID-19 Vaccine

By Wayne Allyn Root

August 21, 2022 6 min read

It's really that bad. I believe the COVID-19 vaccine is clearly the worst medical experiment and health care disaster in history. The results are all around us. Just tune in to the news. Or sports. Or TMZ. Celebrities, athletes, even doctors are dropping dead left and right — in numbers never seen in history.

If you don't believe me, why not ask the life insurance executives? They're reporting deaths up anywhere from 20% to 40% since the vaccines debuted. These are non-COVID-19 deaths. This is a number never seen in history. Even during World War II, deaths were not up by 20% to 40% across the USA. Not even close.

Recently, I reported on my personal experience. So many of my friends and even wedding guests (from just this past November) are dead, dying or very sick. It's a cluster of cancer, heart attacks, strokes and serious illness — but only among the vaccinated. No one I know who is unvaccinated is sick. Not one person.

Then just days ago, I reported on seven doctors who died suddenly in Canada in a 14-day period. All not just vaccinated, but based on Canadian mandates, almost certainly quadruple vaccinated. Included in that remarkable list are five dead doctors — all young — who died within just a few days of one another in one city: Toronto.
FEMA

But the real issue is the ones who aren't dead from the COVID-19 vaccine but are injured and/or disabled. They'll be vulnerable to pain, misery and poverty for the rest of their lives.

Based on what a "trusted source" just disclosed to me, we are in for a world of trouble. A credible doctor has come forward. He/she wants to remain anonymous, for fear of losing his/her medical license for telling the truth about vaccine injuries.

Let's call this doctor Dr. Smith. Let's say he practices on the East Coast. As a podiatrist his practice is over 60% older (65 years old and above). Dr. Smith believes about 95% of his patients are vaccinated. The results are devastating.

The unvaccinated patients are fine — no major illness or problems. But Dr. Smith says over 80% of the vaccinated patients are very sick since vaccination.

What is Dr. Smith seeing? First, the vaccinated are dying off. Second, he's seeing heart attacks, strokes and blood clots in incredible numbers. Third, they're getting rare and advanced (stage 4) forms of cancer. Many of his patients were in cancer remission, but suddenly post-vaccine the cancer has come roaring back — except now it's spread everywhere in their bodies. He used to see skin cancer once or twice a month; now he sees it several times a week. Thyroid cancer has skyrocketed — and he reports that it's always diagnosed after they get the booster jab.

They're suffering terrible neurological disease, such as Parkinson's disease. They're experiencing terrible shingles outbreaks. They're suffering serious intestinal issues like colitis and diverticulitis.

Other strange issues he has never seen before: So many of his patients are experiencing terrible eye issues. One patient went suddenly blind in one eye while driving. He's also seeing more elderly patients experiencing falls than ever before.

After hip or knee replacement, Dr. Smith's patients used to recover quickly. Now if they're vaccinated, they often experience terrible postoperative complications and need to be hospitalized.

After seeing or hearing about all these injuries, Dr. Smith always asks, "What's changed? Are you doing anything different? Are you on any new medications?" The answer is always, "Nothing new, but I just got my COVID-19 booster shot."

Then there's the issue of aging. Dr. Smith's older patients have aged horribly, literally overnight — since being vaccinated. They feel it and say it themselves. They say, "I'm falling apart." "I've aged so badly in the past year. I feel like I'm 100 years old." "What's happening? I feel so old. Nothing in my body works anymore." But everything worked fine one year ago. They were aging slowly and beautifully. What changed so radically? They were vaccinated. It's been all downhill since.

Finally, just today one of Dr. Smith's older patients announced his 4-year-old great granddaughter has cancer. He was devastated. Dr. Smith asked, "Was she vaccinated?" The patient replied, "Yes, why do you ask?"

No one gets it. It's as if everyone is brain-dead, clueless, delusional or brainwashed. The signs are everywhere. How many of you know someone who was vaccinated and died or suffered a bad illness soon thereafter?

We all do.

Wake up, America. I believe this COVID-19 vaccine is the worst medical experiment and health care disaster in history.

And here's the really frightening part: This is just the beginning. The vaccines only became widely available about 18 months ago. It surely is only going to get much worse.

_______________________

Wayne Allyn Root is known as "the Conservative Warrior." Wayne's new No. 1 bestselling book is out, "The Great Patriot Protest and Boycott Book." Wayne is now the host of two new TV shows on Real America's Voice and Mike Lindell TV. He is also host of the nationally syndicated "Wayne Allyn Root: Raw & Unfiltered" on USA Radio Network, daily from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. EST. Visit ROOTforAmerica.com for more information.

https://live.childrenshealthdefense....9-d314a30cdd2b

live show about Neurenberg Now Watch

8/20/22 - 6:00 am•Live
The Nuremberg Code: 75th Annual Commemoration

Your right to Informed Consent. WATCH THIS SHOW.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...xrXaYV4BCA--~D

https://www.judicialwatch.org/videos...crt-continues/

JW: ON THE AIR
FARRELL: “Our Military Will Be Destroyed if CRT Continues”



Judicial Watch Director of Investigations and Research Chris Farrell joins @The Victory Channel to discuss a set of documents we received revealing the Critical Race Theory being taught in our military academies. WATCH NOW!

1:02 video clip runtime

also see YouTube

Very frustrating

Cannot locate the FULL interview of Chris Farrell of Judicial Watch. This is supposed to be on
the YT channel The Victory Channel

sent email to Judicial Watch. Will post full video if I get a reply.

STOP THE SHOTS

https://rumble.com/v1ees0f-right-doc...m_medium=email

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...qG55geVe7w--~D

9:59 Video Runtime

Dachsie followup on
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...avirus/page365

Post Number 3642

Regarding

21 USC 360bbb-3a: Emergency use of medical products

TITLE 21 USC 360bbb-3a: Emergency use of medical products

This is Title 21 of the United States Code.

DO NOT TRUNCATEhttps://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=(title:21%20section:360bbb-3a%20edition:prelim)DONOTTRUNCATE

I am still researching this but it appears that this citation is the basis for charging the US military for breaking the law by mandating or forcing or coercing enlisted soldiers to take the experimental EUA COVID "vaccine."

It appears that the wording of this law applies to all people who are USA citizens, not just to military enlisted soldiers.

Why can't we make them

STOP THE SHOTS !
______________

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...dition:prelim)

§360bbb–3a. Emergency use of medical products
(a) Definitions

In this section:
(1) Eligible product

The term "eligible product" means a product that-

(A) is approved or cleared under this subchapter, conditionally approved under section 360ccc of this title, or licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262];

(B)(i) is intended for use to prevent, diagnose, or treat a disease or condition involving a biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents; or

(ii) is intended for use to prevent, diagnose, or treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product described in clause (i); and

(C) is intended for use during the circumstances under which-

(i) a determination described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 360bbb–3(b)(1) of this title has been made by the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, or the Secretary, respectively; or

(ii) the identification of a material threat described in subparagraph (D) of section 360bbb–3(b)(1) of this title has been made pursuant to section 319F–2 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 247d–6b].
(2) Product

The term "product" means a drug, device, or biological product.
(b) Expiration dating
(1) In general

The Secretary may extend the expiration date and authorize the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of an eligible product after the expiration date provided by the manufacturer if-

(A) the expiration date extension is intended to support the United States ability to protect-

(i) the public health; or

(ii) military preparedness and effectiveness; and

(B) the expiration date extension is supported by an appropriate scientific evaluation that is conducted or accepted by the Secretary.
(2) Requirements and conditions

Any extension of an expiration date under paragraph (1) shall, as part of the extension, identify-

(A) each specific lot, batch, or other unit of the product for which extended expiration is authorized;

(B) the duration of the extension; and

(C) any other requirements or conditions as the Secretary may deem appropriate for the protection of the public health, which may include requirements for, or conditions on, product sampling, storage, packaging or repackaging, transport, labeling, notice to product recipients, recordkeeping, periodic testing or retesting, or product disposition.
(3) Effect

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], an eligible product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because, with respect to such product, the Secretary has, under paragraph (1), extended the expiration date and authorized the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of such product after the expiration date provided by the manufacturer.
(4) Expiration date

For purposes of this subsection, the term "expiration date" means the date established through appropriate stability testing required by the regulations issued by the Secretary to ensure that the product meets applicable standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity at the time of use.
(c) Current good manufacturing practice
(1) In general

The Secretary may, when the circumstances of a domestic, military, or public health emergency or material threat described in subsection (a)(1)(C) so warrant, authorize, with respect to an eligible product, deviations from current good manufacturing practice requirements otherwise applicable to the manufacture, processing, packing, or holding of products subject to regulation under this chapter, including requirements under section 351 or 360j(f)(1) of this title or applicable conditions prescribed with respect to the eligible product by an order under section 360j(f)(2) of this title.
(2) Effect

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], an eligible product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because, with respect to such product, the Secretary has authorized deviations from current good manufacturing practices under paragraph (1).
(d) Emergency dispensing

The requirements of subsections (b) and (f) of section 353, section 354, and section 360j(e) of this title shall not apply to an eligible product, and the product shall not be considered an unapproved product (as defined in section 360bbb–3(a)(2)(A) of this title) and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because it is dispensed without an individual prescription, if-

(1) the product is dispensed during the circumstances described in subsection (a)(1)(C); and

(2) such dispensing without an individual prescription occurs-

(A) as permitted under the law of the State in which the product is dispensed; or

(B) in accordance with an order issued by the Secretary, for the purposes and duration of the circumstances described in subsection (a)(1)(C).
(e) Emergency use instructions
(1) In general

The Secretary, acting through an appropriate official within the Department of Health and Human Services, may create and issue emergency use instructions to inform health care providers or individuals to whom an eligible product is to be administered concerning such product's approved, licensed, or cleared conditions of use.
(2) Effect

Notwithstanding any other provisions of this chapter or the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.], a product shall not be considered an unapproved product and shall not be deemed adulterated or misbranded under this chapter because of the issuance of emergency use instructions under paragraph (1) with respect to such product or the introduction or delivery for introduction of such product into interstate commerce accompanied by such instructions-

(A) during an emergency response to an actual emergency that is the basis for a determination described in subsection (a)(1)(C); or

(B) by a government entity (including a Federal, State, local, or tribal government entity), or a person acting on behalf of such a government entity, in preparation for an emergency response.

(June 25, 1938, ch. 675, §564A, as added Pub. L. 113–5, title III, §302(b), Mar. 13, 2013, 127 Stat. 183 ; amended Pub. L. 114–255, div. A, title III, §3088(c), Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1149 ; Pub. L. 116–22, title VII, §705(c), June 24, 2019, 133 Stat. 964 .)

Editorial Notes
References in Text

The Public Health Service Act, referred to in subsecs. (b)(3), (c)(2), and (e)(2), is act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, 58 Stat. 682 , which is classified generally to chapter 6A (§201 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 201 of Title 42 and Tables.
Amendments

2019-Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 116–22 substituted "subsection (a)(1)(C)" for "subsection (a)(1)(C)(i)".

2016-Subsec. (a)(1)(A). Pub. L. 114–255, §3088(c)(1), inserted ", conditionally approved under section 360ccc of this title," after "subchapter".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–255, §3088(c)(2), substituted "subsections (b) and (f) of section 353, section 354, and section 360j(e) of this title" for "sections 353(b) and 360j(e) of this title" in introductory provisions.