-
Re: Coronavirus
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/i...m_source=email
Inside the mind of one of my very smart pro-vax friends
Here's how they think. It's 100% based on deference to authority. If you ask them for data to back up their claims, they stop responding.
Steve Kirsch
3 hr ago August 22, 2022
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1200x900.jpeg
I recently talked to a friend of mine at a recent social event. We’ll call him Bob. He’s super smart about most things. But when it comes to the vaccine, he’s blind to the truth.
He was bragging about how he has been vaxxed 6 times with the COVID vax and he’s perfectly healthy. He can’t wait for SB 866 in California to pass so when his kids turn 12, they can decide to get the vaccine over their mother’s objections.
Bob thinks I’m a nut case, cherry picking data. He says I used to be respected, but after turning anti-vax, people have lost all respect for me. He said I have a religious belief about the vaccine and I’m not driven by data.
What he isn’t telling anyone is that he’s been losing his vision ever since he got his first COVID vaccine. He used to have 20/20 vision, but now he wears glasses and can’t drive at night. When I brought up the data showing the connection between the shots and vision loss, he changed the topic.
I showed him two papers showing the more you vaccinate, the sicker you get (see the two papers here). I asked, “Where are the papers that show the opposite?” He ignored my request.
He gets his belief system from the mainstream media. Full stop. He reasons that if I was correct, surely Bill Gates would agree with me and admit they goofed. It’s 100% deference to authority.
Bob will not look at the data himself and he doesn’t want to discuss it. He will not engage. He thinks that if I was right, there would be more than a handful of people speaking out. So he tallies the size of the support base on each side of an issue instead of looking at the data.
I hope this is useful in helping you understand the pro-vaxxers and how they think.
The important thing is you cannot turn these people around. Arguing with them is fruitless because they don’t want to see the data. They will only come around when the people they trust change their position.
This is why we need to focus on protecting doctors who speak out.
Perhaps a state ballot initiative in California providing that doctors cannot be retaliated against when they tell the truth (including having social media accounts taken down, having their license to practice medicine revoked, etc). That would prevent things like this from ever happening again.
_______
Dachsie comment:
One thing that has become very clear to me is that even standard good pre-"pandemic" USA medical practice relies a great deal on data,
and there is good data and bad data and both kinds can get published in good medical journals.
Data comes from research studies.
Studies are paid for, directly or indirectly, through NIH and other governmental entities by BigPharma and then published in journals owned by BigPharma.
Patients with COVID diagnosis codes who are admitted to hospitals are subject to "hospital protocols" treatments, and the hospitals are owned by BigPharma and the doctors who are owned by BigPharma or by state university medical teaching hospitals who are funded by governmental entities who are, directly or indirectly funded by, you guessed it, BigPharma.
Studies can be democratically designed by using the end justifies the means method, which I have been told is not true science.
-
Re: Coronavirus
This speech was epoch! Glad we can replay because live version was a bit glitched.
_________
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3
August 22, 2022
WATCH THE HISTORIC REPLAY
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...0bc1e5ad77.jpg
Now On-Demand: The Nuremberg Code
75th Anniversary Commemoration
On August 20, 2022, a compelling line-up of international speakers traveled to Nuremberg to commemorate the 75th Anniversary of The Nuremberg Code. In its jubilee year, this achievement of mankind faced the greatest hardship since it was written.
Speakers include CHD President Mary Holland, CHD Africa Executive Director Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Martin Michealis, Steffi Bresnik, Rolf Kron + more.
For more information visit the 75th Anniversary website: https://www.xn--75jahre-nrnberger-kodex-kpc.de/
embedded video
Watch Video
6:38:02 video runtime
-
Re: Coronavirus
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-to-tell-who-is-telling-you-the?utm_source=email
How to tell who is telling you the truth
There is a lot of misinformation out there and sometimes it can be hard to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. Here's a handy checklist.
Steve Kirsch Newsletter
3 hr ago August 22, 2022
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...8_600x338.jpeg
As a kid, I used to watch “To Tell the Truth.” The above is a recreation of the original TV series.
Executive summary
In this article, I provide 5 rules to help you figure out who is telling the truth and who is not. Even if just one rule is true, it’s a very strong indicator. If you hit all five, there’s no doubt.
Introduction
I am a misinformation superspreader. MIT admits it (however, it’s interesting that page doesn’t load anymore whereas the rest of the site works fine).
Here’s how that is defined:
There are other misinformation spreaders who are actually spreading real misinformation. They “look” on the surface like misinformation spreaders such as myself, but they are not. They are trying to mislead people into believing things that just aren’t true.
Consider for example Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, Mark Bailey, Stefan Lanka, Andrew Kaufman, Jon Rappaport, and others. Those people all claim, without evidence, that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. They claim an experiment has not been done to their satisfaction. I have challenged them to debate two of my highly qualified colleagues (James Lyons-Weiler and Kevin McKernan) and they simply stop responding to my emails and refuse to accept the challenge. The reason is obvious: they would be exposed as misleading people. In the meantime, they claim to their followers that my colleagues and I are the ones running for cover.
Here are a few generic techniques you can use to sort out who is telling you the truth and who is not. I’ll use the Cowan et al. gang as examples of each method, but the methods apply also to the CDC, FDA, NIH, members of Congress, the mainstream media, and the mainstream medical community:
What do they do when challenged to a livestream debate on a neutral platform? Ducking and running for cover is a sure sign they are afraid of any challenge. So are ad hominem attacks as excuses for not debating. In the case of our antivirus friends, they won’t appear when challenged. They simply stop responding to emails. So they won’t accept our challenge, nor will they offer a public challenge that we can publicly accept. They are simply not interested in a debate because they know they would lose. Badly.
They make false claims that are easily verifiable regarding the other party. In this case, they claim we are the ones running from a debate when the reality is that they are.
What do they do when offered an opportunity to win $200K or more if they are right? Not taking the bet is a sure sign that they are not confident in their position. Believe me, if they offered me that bet as to whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists, I’d accept in a heartbeat. They won’t take my offer and they won’t make a comparable offer to the public for anyone to accept. Why not? It means they have no confidence in their position because they aren’t willing to risk capital on it. Capital at risk is a very objective way to assess strength of conviction in a belief. Cowan et al. score a 0 on this one.
Can they offer an alternative hypothesis that better fits all the existing data? There is over 100 years of evidence that viruses are real. Cowan et al. have a trivial task to prove their hypothesis is more likely. They can simply go through all the evidence of the last 100 years and prove that each observation is better explained by “viruses don’t exist” than “viruses exist.” They haven’t done that. They cannot even explain the most basic observations like how family member A gets sick, then family member B gets sick and tests positive on the same antigen test that they were negative on before. They also cannot explain how different groups working completely independently found the same viral genetic sequence. These are two simple things and they simply can’t explain them. We even have Patrick Gunnels on video admitting the former.
Do they abruptly shut off communication when the questions get uncomfortable? This is the technique used by government agencies. I spoke with Patrick Gunnels who assured me that viruses don’t exist. But he let slip that bacteriophages have been isolated. I pointed out that bacteriophages are viruses. He then said “nobody has seen them reproduce” so they aren’t viruses. I then said, “OK, so if they don’t use the cell’s machinery to reproduce, then how are all the replicas created?” He requested I stop emailing him at that point.
No amount of evidence will make a difference. Koch’s postulates have been satisfied and there are viruses which are large enough to see with an optical microscope (see this article which covers these topics and references the other 9 articles I’ve written on the topic). None of this makes any difference to Cowan et al. They just ignore it and hope their followers do too. None of them read what I wrote. I could write a hundred more articles on this and it wouldn’t make a difference. They seem to not be able to read or understand any of them.
I can probably think of more ways than these five, but this should cover all the cases.
I don’t know of any case where any of these will lead you astray.
There are also rules which are not as reliable and should not be used alone. One such example is being banned from Twitter. This is normally a badge of honor. Based on what I know, most of the people who have been banned with respect to COVID-19 information were telling the truth. I see them up here in Twitter Heaven all the time, joking around at the bar, or at our nightly dinners. As for me, I’ve had two lifetime bans with the same account, a feat rarely achieved (I was reincarnated once). I’m in Twitter heaven, whereas Tom Cowan is still active on Twitter.
When you get all 5 being satisfied, there should be absolutely no doubt in your mind who is telling the truth.
__________________
Dachsie comment:
I'm not smart enough to take sides in this one.
I don't want to tell if someone is telling "the truth."
All I want is THE truth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiG39BbQpOU
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email
Here is the Mark Crispin Miller's latest "died unexpectedly" report.
Five Salvadorans have dropped dead while walking on the street; 92 fresh graves found in a small New Zealand town
Still more evidence that those "vaccines" are REALLY doing to millions what "the virus" NEVER did to anyone—i.e., causing them to "drop dead in the street" (a Big Lie to be probed at Nuremberg 2.0)
Mark Crispin Miller
19 min ago August 22, 1922
Excerpts of the report.
" And that was just the start; for then came the “vaccines”—which, for some 20 months, have actually been doing what “the virus” was alleged to do, but never did. Now (literally) countless people, all throughout the world, are dropping dead while walking on the street (or on the job, or at the wheel, or on the playing-field, or at the store, or home in bed): a stark fact overwhelmingly confirmed by evidence of every kind—and yet those millions cannot see it, even when their “vaccinated” loved ones drop dead, too, or they themselves collapse (because—they think—of “COVID”).
Thus the Big Lie hatched in China, a fiction inescapably affirmed as “fact” by media throughout the world (especially “our free press”), did not just jump-start this second Holocaust, but, in so doing, also launched the current wave of Holocaust denial, that first traumatic specter of “the virus” perfectly pre-blinding millions to the murderous effects of those “vaccines.”
It’s way past time to recognize the evil genius of such propaganda, both because it might help us to wake some others up (before it is too late for them), and to make ready for the day when all those liars are finally in the dock, whatever that may take. (Scroll down for Vera Sharav’s powerful speech marking the 75th anniversary of the first Nuremberg trial.)"
Vera Sharav’s speech, yesterday in Nuremberg:
https://rumble.com/v1gtl0n-vera-sharav-speech-at-nuremberg-75.html
26:48 video runtime
-
Re: Coronavirus
post # 3038
Regarding Univ of Texas Medical Branch - National Laboratory - Galveston, TX
President of Texas health system abruptly resigns after being placed on leave
Molly Gamble (Twitter) - 4 hours ago August 23, 2022
Ben Raimer, MD, submitted his resignation from the role of president of the University of Texas Medical Branch Aug. 22, two weeks after he was placed on administrative leave for undisclosed reasons, the Houston Chronicle reports.
Charles Mouton, MD, executive vice president, provost and dean of the UTMB John Sealy School of Medicine, will serve as interim president. The system will conduct a national search for a new leader.
The academic health system did not disclose the reason for the longtime UTMB leader's departure. When he was placed on administrative leave Aug. 8, the system only said the move was not "in any way connected to the operations at UTMB or the Galveston National Lab." The lab has drawn scrutiny over agreements with three Chinese research labs, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Houston Chronicle reports.
Dr. Raimer has been with UTMB for decades, including his start as a student in the graduate and medical schools. In 1993, he became the senior vice president of health policy and legislative affairs. He was appointed interim president of UTMB in 2019, assuming the role permanently in 2021.
Clinically, much of Dr. Raimer's practice has been devoted to the evaluation and treatment of children and adolescents with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities.
UTMB includes four hospital campuses and more than 90 primary and specialty care clinics in Southeast Texas.
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...ton#post988871
-
Re: Coronavirus
Dave of X22 Report has set out his hypothesis several times recently and I have come to see the wisdom in this idea.
https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/e...out-to-unlock/
Ep 2856b – Fly Eagle Fly, Transparency Brings Accountability, News About To Unlock
August 22, 2022
TRANSCRIPT:
@ 37:23 to 38:22 on this video track
""Just like the truth is now coming out about election fraud. Every single day there's more and more information coming out showing that the elections were stolen. They cheated in the election. And actually the Deep State players, treasonous individuals, with the help of a foreign government, they overthrew the United States government which triggered the military. We're in a state of war right now.
Actually, they attacked us when they released COVID on the United States.
November 3rd -- that was the insurrection where they actually overthrew the government of the United states.
And then. January 6 was the cover-up for their insurrection on November 3rd. "
Dachsie further comment"
I think it is quite possible that the "COVID pandemic", which hit the MSM late 2019,
was just as long-term strategically planned for and coordinated event as was the November 2020 presidential election, and the January 2021 subsequent cover-up event.
It was an all inclusive - Step 1, Step 2, Step 3 strategy.
There was careful coordinated widespread planning of the "COVID release" far ahead of "Event 201" and it was part of the bigger plan.
There were thousands more than 2,000 mules and the foreign entity, China, helping on the Dominion voting machines breach in the planning far ahead of election day.
Let's not get too hung up on words like COVID and virus and their meaning. People were getting very sick with what may have been only a bad case of the flu but it got the people to clamor in fear and panic to be given experimental mandated jabs, lockdowns and masks. That was always the goal.
Whatever may have come out of Wuhan lab and however it may have come out on to the people, it served as a rabbit trail distraction for the enormity of the greatest atrocity and crimes against humanity ever.
The PLANdemic played perfectly into parts 2 and 3 of the 3-part plan to take down the United States of America. Call it part of the "Create the problem" strategy.
Maybe the resignations of top people in various areas of government can best be explained by foreknowledge that there will be greater and greater exposures of exactly what has been perpetrated, and big governmental entities and businesses and scientific and academic entities are on the brink of collapse. They will no longer have their cover come mid-terms. The rats are jumping ship.
Rand Paul
@RandPaul TWITTER
·
[SIZE=3]Follow
US Senate candidate, KY
Fauci’s resignation will not prevent a full-throated investigation into the origins of the pandemic. He will be asked to testify under oath regarding any discussions he participated in concerning the lab leak.
11:25 AM · Aug 22, 2022
73.5K
/SIZE]
-
Re: Coronavirus
Find live links to the following stories at the one link below.
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...93d0fd1062.jpg
Top News of the Day
Exclusive: Dr. Robert Malone on Why He’s Suing the WaPo, Plus the Future of Corporate Media and What’s Next for Fauci
Too Little Too Late: WSJ Tries to Save Face on Failed COVID Policies
‘Nature Is Not for Sale,’ Vandana Shiva Tells RFK Jr.
Company Linked to CIA Now Making mRNA for Moderna’s Reformulated COVID Booster Shots
Toxic PFAS Chemicals in Fracking Wells Detected in Drinking Water
Moderna Rolls Out Untested ‘Bivalent’ Vaccine for COVID Strains No Longer Circulating
Knowles Hits Fauci for ‘History of Lying’ + More
Meta Reaches $37.5 Million Settlement of Facebook Location Tracking Lawsuit + More
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://usawatchdog.com/mass-medical...lizabeth-eads/
Mass Medical Bankruptcy & Collapse Coming – Dr. Elizabeth Eads
By Greg Hunter On August 24, 2022
https://usawatchdog.com/wp-content/u...ic-300x229.png
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com
In May, Dr. Elizabeth Eads revealed the CV19 vax was causing extreme disease. Few doctors were sounding the alarm on the death and carnage from the bioweapon injections, and it’s going to get much worse before it’s over. Dr. Eads says, “Worldwide there are 10,000 deaths from these Covid vaccines daily. That’s a culmination of data . . . collected from Israel, UK, Canada, the U.S. and Brazil. So,10,000 a day and they are estimating we are already up to 12 million deaths worldwide.” Dr. Eads thinks the death and injuries from the CV19 bioweapon will be orders of magnitude higher in the next five years.
Dr. Fauci, Dr. Birx, the FDA and CDC see what is coming. According to Dr. Eads, “They know this. They planned for it. They knew the consequences. They manipulated the vaccines as they went along and what was going into the vaccines . . . to make the booster shots more lethal. . . . Your immune system is absolutely destroyed with these shots. Every time you get a shot, you lose more of your immune system. You lose 30% after the first shot, 60% to 70% after the second shot, 80% or more after the third shot, and you lose 100% of your immune system after the 4th shot. You also have the propensity to develop vaccine induced aids.”
You can also get heart disease, blood clots, strokes, brain disease, extreme shingles and develop fast spreading extreme cancers, just to name a few of the effects of the bioweapon so-called vaccines, according to Dr. Eads.
Dr. Eads goes on to say, “People are waking up and saying, ‘Oh my gosh, what did I do to my immune system,’ and this is irreversible. It’s irreversible because you cannot not turn off the intercellular mechanism. You cannot turn off the nano particle system that is making these long clot-like structures in veins and arteries. . . . There is no such thing as ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. These are side effects of the vaccine. Nobody dies of ‘Sudden Death’ when they are otherwise healthy adults. There is no such thing. . . . Here are the numbers I pulled off Attorney Todd Callender’s site. (He’s suing the U.S. military over the CV19 vax.) The all-cause mortality rate in the military is up 1,100%. . . . The top five life insurance companies are banding together and are going to file a class-action lawsuit against Big Pharma.”
That’s not all, according to Dr. Eads, as she sees not only Big Pharma liable for damages but hospitals, doctors, nurses, drug store chains and all sorts of people who helped make this bioweapon genocide possible. Dr. Eads says, “You are talking about billions of dollars, and they are not going to be able to afford to pay out all these claims. . . .It’s going to bankrupt Big Pharma, and Big Pharma will end up collapsing. Hospitals will also end up collapsing because they were complicit in death by ventilators and remdesivir. Mass medical bankruptcies are coming 100%. This is going to be the collapse of the Rockefeller medical industry.”
Dr Eads says there are treatments that can help both the vaxed and unvaxed with removing harmful spike proteins. Two she named are Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Dr. Eads says there are some other helpful treatments and procedures as well.
There is much more cutting edge, frontline medical information in the nearly 1-hour and 19-minute interview.
Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25-year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads, DO, as she continues to highlight the worsening, and now obvious, effects of the CV19 bioweapon vax.
embedded video
1:19:15 video runtime
Video also on Rumble
https://rumble.com/v1h3to1-mass-medi...beth-eads.html
-
Re: Coronavirus
Robert Yoho MD (ret)
The original with the commentary is HERE on the CHD website. Subscribe to their newsletter and you will get the top information source in your inbox daily.
For those who have not heard RFK speak before, he has a chronic voice condition called spastic dysphonia. To understand him most easily, I recommend a 1.25 or 1.5 listening speed.
This interview brought tears to my eyes.
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...AdzAzH3XdA--~D
https://live.childrenshealthdefense....f-f75506350530
August 23, 2022
Good Morning CHD
‘Good Morning CHD’ Episode 109: Fauci Steps Down — Discussion With Robert F. Kennedy Jr. + More
The tide is turning — will you sit by and watch, or will you take part in this momentous time in history? Special guest Robert F. Kennedy kicks off today’s “Good Morning CHD” will a public statement on Anthony Fauci’s resignation and its significance. Then, two other guests join to share more about their work and how viewers can get involved in the fight for medical freedom. Don’t miss this!
46:30 video runtime -recommend a 1.25 or 1.5 listening speed.RFK Jr comes on at 5:18
Michael Kane is a great host.
References
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Podcast With Jeff Sachs
Fauci Announces Resignation
CHD Legal Victories
Rally - March Over Brooklyn Bridge in NYC
Rally - U.S. Open
‘Families Are Essential’ to Join Rally at U.S. Open
U.S. Marines Win Class Protection in Shot Mandate
Dr. Pierre Kory on Vaxxed Miscarriage Rates - Substack
Speakers for NYC Rally