High Ranking US Major General Exposes September 11 High

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

That jet might be going 220mph if that, if it impacted anything at the time there would would be large chunks all about the place. You need 500knots to enable the kind of disintegration you are hoping for.

Give it up joboo, no Boeing can do what your asking, its impossible. It is fully conclusive evidence.

---

You think because your conception of speed = X, then Y is impossible.

I don't think you have the capabilities to definitively say that.

What I do know is they weren't chopping up 180+ people into convincing little bits to withstand meticulous levels of forensic analysis, and hoping nobody would notice anything unusual.

All the passengers magically got into the building from a plane that was headed right there, and suddenly stopped there. Then there's witnesses to this effect who saw the plane coming in, impacting, and nothing flying away.

Big easy button all the way on this. There is nothing that shows a missile did this except for some deceptive loose change pictures compounded with lies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by joboo

You think because your conception of speed = X, then Y is impossible.

I don't think you have the capabilities to definitively say that.

What I do know is they weren't chopping up 180+ people into convincing little bits to withstand meticulous levels of forensic analysis, and hoping nobody would notice anything unusual.

All the passengers magically got into the building from a plane that was headed right there, and suddenly stopped there. Then there's witnesses to this effect who saw the plane coming in, impacting, and nothing flying away.

Big easy button all the way on this. There is nothing that shows a missile did this except for some deceptive loose change pictures compounded with lies.

---

The forensic analysis was to determine/match DNA, not manner of death. Those receiving samples had no idea where they were getting it from, this is stupid to even argue as any basis for the "theoretical".

You are truly beyond any hope of recovery in your physics aptitude if you can't determine that the jetliner shown in your video was traveling nowhere close to the speeds required to disintegrate, which is after all the core & THE ONLY THING which could be determined over the internet looking at photos. As everything else is circumstantial to it. The amount of deviation from course at those speeds in a Boeing is any impossibility to correct even with supercomputing abilities the jetliner is Not physically capable to correct the path in the time and distance required by the evidence that remains.. and as it would be a constant necessity to correct that course to target (The land would eat the course up) at altitude.

There was no plane left there, no wing sections, no bodies, no luggage. not even a stray shoe available outside the building.

Which is where the said "plane" crashed.

THE EASY COURSE WAS THE ROOF!

Again your theorem fails to deliver.

http://ww2.dcmilitary.com/dcmilitary.../12279-1.shtml

^ They knew what they were working on. You can't fake a high impact effect on bone fragments like that with a meat grinder or an axe.

Keep it up jooboo. What with all your evidence and logic, I'm 99% convinced it was a missile.

Why would they go to all that trouble hijacking a 757, doing a huge u-turn that took over an hour lumbering around in US airspace, and smash it into the most strongly defended and secured building on earth when all they had to do was push a button to launch a missile?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Santa

Keep it up jooboo. What with all your evidence and logic, I'm 99% convinced it was a missile.

Why would they go to all that trouble hijacking a 757, doing a huge u-turn that took over an hour lumbering around in US airspace, and smash it into the most strongly defended and secured building on earth when all they had to do was push a button to launch a missile?

---

Joboo is busy trashing another thread and asked me to respond for him:

"But but but, how do you know it was a button? It could have been a toggle switch or a pull chain. If you're not sure of this, then how can you be sure it was a missile? Can't your small brain see the inescapable logic of my argument? I've dumbed this down for you as far as I can. Because, I'm really a nice guy and you should believe me."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Santa

Keep it up jooboo. What with all your evidence and logic, I'm 99% convinced it was a missile.

Why would they go to all that trouble hijacking a 757, doing a huge u-turn that took over an hour lumbering around in US airspace, and smash it into the most strongly defended and secured building on earth when all they had to do was push a button to launch a missile?

---

i'm still digesting what the General said, but i tend to believe his statement about the Pentagon.

so if no airplane hit the Pentagon - what happened to the people on the flight ?

if it was a made-up flight, how do they shut up the airline employees ?

The largest documented forensic analysis project in history, yet nobody knew what they were working on, and thy couldn't tell from the bone fragments the whole thing was faked in some offsite location with hatchets, cleavers, meat grinders etc.

They got all those people off the plane, processed all those the bodies, scooped it all up, drove it all over, and started scattering it all over the place amongst fake debris.

Sounds like a bullet proof plan with no hopes of being found out.

How far fetched does it need to get to uphold the magic missile?

Pretty far it seems.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSqTEkpVzhghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSqTEkpVzhg

Video of Cruise missile hitting Pentagon on 9/11 leaked
Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:22PM
42


5



Download | Embed

Suppressed video released 10 years after 9/11 attacks in the United States clearly shows the Pentagon attack was a Cruise type missile, either a Tomahawk or Russian/Soviet Granit as described by former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence Dimitri Khalezov.

The little explosions which have been circled in the video clearly point out that "there is no huge jet" hammering into the Pentagon, Khalezov explains.

According to the official U.S. government narration, an American Airline Boeing 757 struck the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.

The Boeing 757 is a mid-size, narrow-body twin-engine jet airliner manufactured by Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Its dimension specification include: Wing span 38.05m (124ft 10in), length 47.32m (155ft 3in), height 13.56m (44ft 6in). Wing area 185.3m2 (1994sq ft).

The author of "The third truth about September 11" says every time he uploads such videos on the internet “my YouTube gets deleted or the hits go down.”

He describes a hole that appeared in a Pentagon wall right after the attack. "Look at that little hole. No way a jet [can] fit in there. Where's the wings? Where's the engines?”

The researcher says when the footage is observed frame by frame it shows that "the explosion happens before the 'jet' even appears.”

After 11 September 2001, Khalezov undertook extensive research on the collapse of the three World Trade Center Towers. The research is claimed to demonstrate that the three towers were demolished by three underground thermo-nuclear explosions.

Moreover, Khalezov claims that he knew about the in-built so-called "emergency nuclear demolitions scheme" for the Twin Towers as long ago as the 1980's, while a serviceman in the Soviet Special Control Service.

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/196559.html

Amazing video Serpo! That is definitely a non-winged missile hitting the Pentagon, a cruise missile. Government lied to us on 911 - surprise!