-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.americaoutloud.com/blood...ovid-vaccines/
Blood Damage Explains Many Harmful Impacts of COVID “Vaccines”
by Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn | Aug 31, 2022
https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...age-COVID.jpeg
[B]Listen to the article [/B]on America Out Loud.
0:00 / 8:36
BeyondWords
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
WARNING: If you have had a COVID vaccine or booster shot, what this article presents may cause you stress and anxiety.
Two key recent medical research articles, one from Italy and one from Germany, are used to document what may be the most critical research finding during the entire COVID pandemic period.
Blood damage that has been detailed through sophisticated research methods is the “missing link” to explain many negative health conditions ranging from heart problems, cancers, reduced immunity, and death. Blood damage is the key biologic explanation for harmful vaccine impacts. Note that I am using the word “vaccine” but fully recognize that COVID vaccines/boosters are not real vaccines, but a form of genetic treatment that, unlike real vaccines, do not actually and truly prevent or cure COVID.
As to deaths, data from Europe, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada on total excess mortality countrywide in 2022 that are greater than in 2020 and 2021 are best explained by widespread COVID vaccine use in 2022 and not COVID infection deaths.
Please understand that ordinary blood testing you may get from your physician’s laboratory orders is not the same as the research techniques used to document vaccine-induced blood damage. Do not let cognitive dissonance stand in the way of your acceptance of these frightening research results.
In both research publications, you must closely examine the many photographs given to prove blood damage; it is infeasible to reproduce them here. It will take time and patience to closely read these two studies. But there is no alternative if you truly want to understand how blood damage has been proven in a compelling way.
Italian study
The title is Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic PersonsAfter Anti-COVIDmRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna, published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
Here is the abstract:
The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study, we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94%of the total sample) whose blood showed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation. In 12 subjects, blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines” themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.
Here are just a few statements from the conclusions:
With the hematological pictures, we have presented here; it is reasonable to expect reactivation of oncological disease along with blood circulation disorders.
The alterations found after the injection of our patient/cases with mRNA materials (whatever may be in them), we found what we believe is conclusive evidence that the modifications observed, as these persons went from normal blood profiles to very abnormal ones, must be attributed to the proximate mRNA injections.
In conclusion, such abrupt changes, as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients, have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past, according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying hemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented. Such phenomena have never been seen before after any “vaccination” of the past.
In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow, especially at the level of the capillaries. [That last statement is consistent with the research that has found evidence of micro blood clots found after vaccination and in long covid victims.]
German study
The title is German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations. It is available on this site. An abstract and a link to the report can be found on Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea’s Substack HERE (English).
“The German Working Group for Covid-19 Vaccine Analysis has made its ‘Summary of Preliminary Findings’ publicly available. In a wide-ranging report dated 6 July, the Group described the toxic substances found in all Covid-19 “vaccine” samples analysed and the marked changes seen in blood samples taken from vaccinated people. The Group also found that the greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent the vaccine side effects.”
“In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the Covid-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately,” the Group’s report stated.”
The Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel Covid-19 “vaccines.” The group is an internationally networked working group with a core team of more than 60 doctors, physicians, pharmacists, scientists, mathematicians, alternative health practitioners, lawyers, and journalists.
This summary is a preliminary, continuously evolving presentation of our research and findings on the so-called Covid-19 vaccines, as well as the effects we found on the human body and the blood in particular. The summary is intended for the public interest and to encourage further scientific discussion.
The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the Covid-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed.
Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, they determined that artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the Covid-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes.
Crystalline formations were found in all of the blood samples taken from vaccinated people. “We are continuing to analyse these formations,” the authors noted. The Group also observed rouleaux formations of red blood cells in all vaccinated samples and “frequently observed an unusually rapid disintegration of the different types of cells in the vaccinated blood.”
The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, toxic.
The following predominantly metallic elements were unexpectedly detected in the doses from AstraZeneca, BioNTech/Pfizer, and Moderna:
• Alkali metals: caesium (Cs), potassium (K),
• Alkaline earth metals: calcium (Ca), barium (Ba),
• Transition metals: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti),
• Rare earth metals: cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd),
• Mining group/metal: aluminium (Al),
• Carbon group: silicon (Si) (partly support material/slide),
• Oxygen group: sulphur (S)
Conclusion
The blood damage caused by COVID “vaccines” is best seen by the public as the key “missing link” that can explain what I and many others have been reporting on for many months. Namely, the multitude of adverse health impacts and deaths from what the medical and public health establishment, the mainstream media, and government agencies are still pushing on the public.
Eventually, history will show that all the powers forcing COVID “vaccines” on the public do not have the courage and integrity to admit that the “vaccines” were a dangerous and false pandemic solution that ultimately will explain millions of deaths. They can be seen as part of the Bio-War forced upon humanity – a true crime against humanity. And the principal force that created the phony vaccine movement was Anthony Fauci, for home prosecution as a criminal is sorely needed.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/...m_source=email
The Defeat Of COVID
Is Medicare a Slow-Kill Program?
Is this seemingly benevolent reward offered to seniors for a lifetime of work, rather, a guiding hand to the grave?
ColleenHuberNMD
18 min ago September 4, 2022
Excerpts from excellent article
The new “Inflation Reduction Act” (IRA) has a name that is highly questionable, given its profligate and inflation-stimulating government spending, such as one quarter trillion dollars for climate change tax credits for corporations, and for 87,000 additional IRS agents. The falsification of the name of this Act alone rings alarm bells for violation of 18 USC Section 1001, which makes it a felony for any government actor to falsify a material fact in a document related to a federal matter. This crime carries up to five years in prison.
...
Freely breathing creatures of the human variety were criticized and shamed for our unobstructed respiratory practices, through the COVID era, for ‘killing Grandma’ by lack of mask-wearing. But was it us, the relentlessly unmasked, who were killing Grandma?
Scrutiny of Medicare’s mission might have been seen as preposterous before COVID, a respiratory viral disease for which the world went crazy, but actually had no greater mortality than the flu virus. Infection fatality for COVID is 0.15%, and for a typical annual flu is usually about 0.17% (Statista data from 2006 to 2008, back when the counting was more straightforward.) COVID symptoms varied from typical flu, especially loss of smell and reduced oxygenation, but otherwise the death rate remained about the same as most years.
Yet for this typical seasonal viral mortality, hospital protocols, among much else in our world, have transformed to something utterly unrecognizable from the recent past. Ventilators were ordered, distributed and quickly connected to many tracheas, to a worldwide chorus of muffled protests, both from the victims of an over-pressurized tube rammed down the throat, and from their family members who were made to wait outside. More about this bizarre new protocol below.
...
Now let’s go back to how COVID changed hospitalization and particularly “healthcare” and its creeping inclusion of euthanasia, in the case of seniors.
Since COVID came along, the public has had brief, not-well-publicized glimpses into the much-altered lives and health of hospital patient escapees, and we have heard some horrendous stories of how they were treated while there. As a physician, I have heard through the stethoscope radically altered heart rhythms of such escapees who managed to survive a Remdesivir assault. Remdesivir is a drug that is known to be highly toxic to the liver and the kidneys and the lungs. Multiple organ failure was repeatedly observed after use of this drug. Yet it is Anthony Fauci’s drug of choice for treating COVID. Remdesivir has been observed to lead to respiratory failure in 11% of the patients who are on it for 10 days (“commonly reported,”) even to the point of then requiring intubation.
So Remdesivir is clearly contraindicated in COVID patients, yet in the upside-down world of hospital medicine, it is “standard of care.”
Hospital COVID procedures in the US have been revealed in horrifying anecdotes, empirical observations by very rare whisteblower nurses and doctors. For example, in 2020, ER physician Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell blew the whistle on ventilators that had an 80% mortality rate within a couple days of use with COVID patients. He asked why it was expected for him to be blowing patients’ functional lung tissue out with way over-pressurized ventilators, noting the high mortality. Nurses would mention hospital patients who in 2020-2021 were deprived of both food and water, with a story of a hospitalized man who had to crawl on hands and knees to not be seen by the staff, to the toilet bowl, in order to get a drink of water, and others’ similar desperate grasps for survival. This was especially the case with seniors who were positive for COVID, and even more discriminatory for patients with multiple co-morbidities.
With COVID, came the 2020 US CARES Act, a little-mentioned $160 billion, then $178 billion, boondoggle (more than double the cost of the Ukraine boondoggle so far, AND before intense recent inflation). This Act funded some very peculiar hospital protocols – with tens of millions, and hundreds of millions, of dollars going to the biggest hospitals for COVID treatment.
Yet, in the US, we still have little system-wide testimony or evidence of brutality to hospitalized COVID patients revealed in the mass media to the public. Unfortunately, many of the closest witnesses are now dead.
The UK has revealed more of the financial and political involvement in euthanasia decisions in high-risk hospital situations, in publicly available documents.
Journalist Maajid Nawaz spoke with UK medical researcher Stuart Wilkie. https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/Radical-Episode-17:d
Wilkie told Nawaz, “Hundreds of thousands of people are being routinely murdered in the National Health Service.” Where does he get that information? Well, he found in the House of Lords Library and the House of Commons Library some revealing documents.
Chris Whitty, England’s Chief Medical Officer, in a document that he insisted not be released to the public, wrote of “consideration of mass burials and the potential use of population triage by the NHS . . . [which raised questions of] potential responses of the general population upon hearing that such measures were being considered or used.” This document is in the House of Lords Library.
Euthanasia has been openly discussed and openly practiced. Here we see a House of Commons definition: “A good death requires three things: syringe drivers, the medications, and the staff to administer it.” Euthanasia is from the Greek for “good death.” This mass killing was financially incentivized, and lack of cooperation was disincentivized in UK hospitals.
UK patients are also disincentivized from choosing to live. When a hospital patient is pressured to sign a Do Not Resuscitate order, they are told ‘if we try to resuscitate you, we will break your ribs.’ You don’t want painful broken ribs, do you? At every step, from hospital triage and admittance to treatment, seniors suffered by far the worst of any age group.
It is not in dispute that the UK government ordered an inordinately large amount of Midazolam in the COVID era. By the time peak COVID mania had crested, 27 months of drugs were used within 9 months in the UK. Somehow Midazolam was added to treatment for COVID disease protocol. As Nawaz asks, “Why add a drug that makes it harder for you to breathe?” when COVID already impairs oxygenation?
Midazolam should have been the LAST thing a COVID patient would be given.
The amount of Midazolam needed to kill a person within 24 hours is about 9.5 mg, and this was used in UK hospitals, where 83% of those died within 24 hours on that dose, together with 14 mg morphine, which has a highly dangerous synergistic effect, when dosed together with Midazolam, of respiratory depression. It has been known for decades that these drugs used together risk respiratory arrest, which is lethal.
In the United States, where states permit execution by lethal injection, Midazolam is one of the major drugs used for that purpose.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...f9_542x528.png
Again, this lethal drug, used on death row to kill by lethal injection, is what UK and US hospitals gave routinely to COVID patients.
Here is what Wilkie found of the extravagant drug purchases made in the UK, divided by the number of UK hospital patients projected here to be killed by it = 549,000. This left a highly lethal 18 mg of Midazolam per patient, nearly twice the known lethal dose being used in UK hospitals. Meanwhile, prior manufacturer protocols for patients over 60 years of age, for alleged therapeutic use, is closer to only one milligram.
Keep in mind that Midazolam has nothing at all to do with treating a respiratory condition; quite the opposite, it is a respiratory depressant. Its use, besides killing those on death row, is in “end-of-life care.” And it interferes with memory and with speech, both of which actions have a well-known inhibitory effect on protest, the reporting of crimes or assertion of one’s choices. How convenient. Worse, the new COVID protocols forced family members and other patient advocates to wait outside, unable to observe the atrocities committed inside.
Worse still, the commonplace withholding of food and water from hospitalized COVID patients in the UK as well as the US was widely reported. Resulting dehydration interferes with liver processing of any drugs given, which heightens risk of toxicity.
As Maajid Nawaz says in the above interview with researcher Stuart Wilkie, “This takes us to Nuremberg level crimes against humanity.”
But the promotion of “palliative,” “end-of-life,” and other compassionate-sounding terms for the killing of sick and hospitalized patients has become more commonplace, since 2011, both in the UK and in the US. Further, the particularly lethal combination of Midazolam and morphine used in UK care homes, was authorized – not just for doctors to carry out, but also nurses and medical assistant staff – and it was authorized by the UK government in this document. And not to worry, because this document says clearly: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.”
Why did this happen?
Number crunchers had apparently decided that seniors were too expensive for a country to support in their senior years. “Savings in pensions, reductions in costs for health care” are motives that journalist Stuart Wilkie attributes to risk-benefit calculations. “Britain is killing our old people on a mass scale.”
The Times of London on July 26 2022 reported a brutal triage system termed “Exercise Cygnus” of scoring patients according to number of co-morbidities and deliberately leaving some to die without food or water, and hastening the deaths of others. All 80 year olds were and most over age 75 were targeted.
Back in the early 2010’s, a program named Liverpool Care Pathway forced a similar regimen of dehydration and starvation on British seniors. Much bad press and uproar among the public led to talk of that program’s being shut down. However, it was not shut down. Instead, it was sold to 22 countries, including the US. The US then re-named it the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, which then took an interest in “end of life care.” Then President Obama noted during his promotion of his signature program that one quarter of all healthcare spending for an individual takes place during the final year of life, and he spoke of end-of-life counseling.
Well, Obamacare was a renamed Liverpool Care Pathway, a notorious program, now acknowledged to be a slow-kill machine for seniors, and is now widely criticized throughout Europe. In the COVID era, this has become a slow-kill weapon against all patients over 60, who find themselves in the extreme misfortune of going to a hospital for any reason, being pronounced as a COVID patient, and then finding themselves on drugs that impair anterograde memory, that is, new memories, memory of anything happening at the time or afterward. Midazolam just so happens to have that known effect. Both hospitalized seniors and those in care homes are in the crosshairs of such programs. Many were not at the end of their lives, nor had life-terminating conditions, but were targeted nevertheless. In the UK, Liverpool Care Pathway was continued, but its essence was renamed to NG-163.
In the US, the killing program of seniors was given the benevolent sounding name of the US CARES Act, the massive boondoggle COVID hospital program that taxpayers would not have heard about, were it not for MN State Senator Scott Jenson, MD, who blew the whistle to the public. No one else talks about the US CARES Act, which funded the genocide of seniors in the US under the pretext of anti-viral efforts. Remdesivir, a drug that causes kidney failure, but for some insane or malevolent reason has been given to hospitalized COVID patients, was offered at first, but then if that drug, nicknamed by hospital personnel, “run, death is near” did not finish the job, then Midazolam and morphine were offered as follow-up.
Let us all now ask: If 1) Medicare has affiliated with risk-benefit experts who decide what another year of life for a random patient is worth, and 2) If the US CARES Act funded such deadly hospital protocols as Remdesivir, Midazolam and ventilators, which were mostly used on seniors (average age of COVID death was 81 in 2020), and 3) Medicare is now mandatory, with penalties for not going along with it, then is Medicare in every senior citizen’s best interest? Should a person be able to opt out of it? Or to have a person’s Medicare funds directed to a form of healthcare of each person’s own choosing?
And by the way, are existing laws and the Constitution ever going to be enforced against the lawbreakers? Or are they too big and too numerous to jail?
Share
-
Re: Coronavirus
Jon Rappoport
https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/...m_source=email
Why Serious Scientific Debates Are Conducted In Writing, Not On-camera
Unless you're pandering to video junkies
Jon Rappoport
18 min ago, September 5, 2022
Last week, I set the record straight on why a proposed debate about the existence of SARS-CoV-2 is not happening.
That was MY position and mine alone.
So is this.
Steve Kirsch insists the debate should be held on-camera.
True scientific debates would never take place in that fashion.
Video flows by. Speakers talk. Viewers build up IMPRESSIONS of what’s going on---there is no meticulous examination of facts and fantasies.
Yes, people are solidly addicted to video as a way of obtaining their news; but that doesn’t mean it’s a proper medium for vital debates about science.
WRITTEN WORD is how you conduct scientific debates, if truth is the objective. Then the reader can FORGET ABOUT tone of voice, charm of delivery, physical appearance of the debaters, and various tricks of that trade.
A reader can focus on every important detail on the page. He can spot gaps in logic, errors of fact, unwarranted assumptions. He can deploy the trait called REASON, which since the time of Aristotle, has been the hallmark of good science.
He isn’t WATCHING people talk. He’s poring over what they claim, every bit of it. “The devil is in the details” isn’t an off-the-cuff maxim. It’s core reality, once you get down to the serious business of deciding what science is and isn’t.
This is why such debates should be carried out on the page.
Of course, people addicted to video are going to argue for video, just as the junkie will argue in every possible way for his next fix. He has a need. He has to satisfy it. When confronted by someone who tells him he’s heading down the wrong path, he’ll lash out. He’ll accuse. He’ll lie.
And if he’s pandering to junkies, he’ll describe the virtues of the drug. In this case, video:
“You see, you sit there and watch, and you can TELL who’s speaking the truth and who isn’t. You can look at their eyes. You can see the way they make gestures. You can hear the hills and valleys in their way of talking…”
Yes, and so perhaps Walter Cronkite would be the ideal man to have on board arguing that SARS-CoV-2 exists. He was everybody’s wise old uncle. Whatever Walter uttered was an automatic slam-dunk.
The lovers of video also tend to favor science as democracy. “Let the people watch and decide who’s right…”
“Well, the debate was very interesting. Dr. Conglomerate really knew his stuff. He was rattling off facts like a pro. And the woman who backed him up, Dr. Pants Suit, looked straight at the camera the whole time. Wow. I was extremely impressed when she said over four hundred virologists were on record agreeing with her. If I recall, she cited Professor Moishe Meshugge, the Bulgarian, whose great grandfather discovered one of the first viruses…”
Whereas, IN WRITING, Dr. Pants Suit penned this: “…We used 50 μL of viral lysate for total nucleic acid extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. We also used 50 μL of virus lysate to inoculate a well of a 90% confluent 24-well plate.”
To which Dr. Andrew Kaufman replied, in writing: “How do you confirm something that was never previously shown to exist? What did you compare the genetic sequences to? How do you know the origin of the genetic material since it came from a cell culture containing material from humans and all their microflora, fetal cows, and monkeys?”
Oops. Wait. What? Now, we’re getting technical. Now we’re digging down into the actual lab procedure by which virologists claim they’re discovering viruses never seen before.
There is where the devil is, in the details. And as you can see, we have a problem. The language of the lab is very dense. It’s going take quite an effort to translate it into terms non-virologists can understand.
The effort is vital. It’s absolutely necessary, because THERE is where the debate actually takes place. Are these lab virologists on the money, or are they leaping from one unwarranted assumption to another?
You decide that on the page, in writing, not on a screen with moving mouths.
“But wait…I don’t want that technical debate. I want to watch people talking on video. I want to see who seems to be right. I want to figure out who the heroes and villains are. I want to sip my coffee and find out how the plot turns out. How the story ends. I want to be watching an episode of Law & Order. Otherwise IT’S NOT FAIR. Keep it simple. When you drop the apple, does it fall to the ground, or does it hover in the air?”
Yes, well, no one said this debate would be easy---except for the people who want video and talking heads and a poll when it’s over.
Share
As I just mentioned, one of the big challenges of a true debate is taking that lab language and making it comprehensible for non-virologists. And if doing that seems somehow distracting or troublesome or irritating or annoying or “an intentional diversion” from an easy walk in the park that winds up, in a few hours, with THE FINAL ANSWER, well, you can’t always ingest the truth like a candy bar or a fast-food cardboard burger.
If you think you can, you’re a misguided child of the culture, and one of the prime convincers of this modern instant culture is VIDEO.
It’s the absolute wrong way to go in this case. It gives you a corn dog on a stick in a mall.
It gives you somebody in your ear telling you the corn dog is all you need to munch, to reach the bottom line.
But hey, if you want to see men and women on a screen talking and arguing in generalities and claiming they have the upper hand, go for it.
You won’t find me there. I’ve got other big game to hunt.
Mr. Steve Kirsch has turned himself into a rank carnival barker, peddling a distorted and deformed product sitting behind a cheap curtain. He knows many people want to see what’s behind the curtain, because whatever it is, it’s video, and that’s what they need.
Does he know what he’s doing, or is he another junkie with the same need?
You’d have to ask him. But I believe in his more sober moments, he understands an on-camera debate on the virus issue solves nothing.
It’s just show business. It’s a crap low-rent carnival in a dried-up field on a slow Saturday afternoon.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.americaoutloud.com/expos...inical-trials/
Exposing Criminal Data Fraud from the Pfizer Clinical Trials
For more info, go to…
To sign on in support of the Grand Jury Petition, go to www.BeyondTheCon.com.
Join The Fight!
by Dr. Henry Ealy | Sep 5, 2022 | Health, Politics
https://www.americaoutloud.com/wp-co...Show-Image.jpg
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
58:52 audio runtime
In this episode of Energetic Health Radio, Dr. H welcomes special guests Brook Jackson, the brave whistleblower, exposing more criminal data fraud from the Pfizer clinical trials, and her powerhouse attorney Warner Mendenhall. Together, they share facts about what happened that will drop your jaw. When wrongdoing became the new normal, the wrongdoers never imagined they’d face someone like Brook Jackson. Listens to what she and Warner have to share that can bring hope to even the most skeptical mind.
For more info, go to…
To sign on in support of the Grand Jury Petition, go to www.BeyondTheCon.com.
Dr. Henry Ealy
Dr. Henry Ealy (Dr. H) is the Founder of, & Executive Community Director for, the Energetic Health Institute. He holds a Doctorate in Naturopathic Medicine from SCNM, a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from UCLA, is Board Certified in Holistic Nutrition by the NANP and a proud Jackie Robinson Scholarship Alumnus. He has over 20 years of teaching & clinical experience helping people care for their amazing body by unlocking the healing potential of Natural Medicines.
-
Re: Coronavirus
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email
News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller
Oklahoma news anchor has stroke on-air; Ohio high school football player has 6 feet of "blood clots" pulled from legs; Seattle ferry crashes for (apparently) no reason; and so on
Another spate of (what appear to be) NON-fatal post-jab mishaps from all over the US, with one in the UK and three in (where else?) Italy
7 hr ago September 5, 2022
I had not intended to post this next batch until next week, but so many such reports have just come in these last two days that I decided not to wait.
UNITED STATES
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...b_634x367.jpeg
This article includes the video of Julie Chin’s disorientation as she tried to read the teleprompter:
'I'm sorry, something is going on with me this morning': Oklahoma news anchor suffers a STROKE live on air as she stumbles over her words
September 5, 2022
News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Chin appeared bewildered by herself as she was suddenly unable to speak the simple words she was reading off the teleprompter in front of her
Chin appeared bewildered by herself as she was suddenly unable to speak the simple words she was reading off the teleprompter in front of her
Julie Chin, of Tulsa NBC affiliate KJRH suddenly found herself unable to speak the words she was reading off her teleprompter while on air
Bewildered and stuttering, Chin tried to push ahead with the broadcast but soon found herself completely unable to speak what she was reading
Chin finally said she couldn't go on and sent the broadcast over to the weather team
The anchor didn't return once the weather was done, however, as co-workers had called 9-11 and she was sent away to a hospital
On Sunday Chin said doctors told her she had suffered the 'beginnings' of a stroke, and confirmed she was okay and would be returning to work soon
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-live-air.html
'It could've been so much worse' | Wauseon football player's career abruptly ends
Kaden Clymer, a junior lineman, had six feet of blood clots removed from his legs just days before the season kicked off.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1920x1080.jpeg
September 3, 2022
WAUSEON, Ohio — It's difficult to match the level of excitement for high school football players when their season is about to start. Yet, imagine all that build come crashing down on you.
Unfortunately, that turned out to be the reality one Wauseon junior had to tackle.
There was never a doubt, Kaden Clymer would have impact on the field. Yet, to do so without pads on came without warning.
"It started on August 1st," Kaden's mother Maurine Clymer said. "His dad took him to the emergency room after he was having severe pain in his back and legs."
Teammate Tyson Rodriguez added "I was a bit confused because I didn't really know what was happening. He just told me that he wasn't feeling good."
The night before the Wauseon Indians took to the field for their first Fall team practice, Clymer unexpectedly had to be taken to Toledo Children's Hospital.
"His calves were swelled up four inches larger, in circumference, than they are now," Maurine Clymer said. "So, he was very uncomfortable."
Kaden Clymer added "I just wanted to go home honestly. I didn't really care what they did to me, I just wanted to go home."
Full of pain and uncertainty, Clymer received word that he had blood clots in his legs.
"I was really sad. I was crying and upset because I've played football my whole life and I just wanted to play with my friends," the junior lineman said.
Six feet of blood clots were removed and because of the blood thinners he now has to take, Clymer's football career is over.
"Was just getting ready to start practice, we were really looking forward to seeing him on Friday nights," his mother said.
Following nine days in the hospital, Clymer returned to the team despite barely being able to walk.
"I'm really happy to be able to spend time with my friends," Kaden said. "It means a lot to me to be able to be back on the field and have fun with them."
Rodriguez added "It was weird not seeing him, but it's good that he's back. He's our guy, so it's nice seeing him here."
A life-changing experience that has proven the toughness of this young man.
"I'm very strong and well-minded because it took a lot of effort to be able to stay in the hospital for nine days straight," Clymer said. "Eat the hospital food and go through all those procedures, it really sucked."
Unfortunately, Clymer's path to recovery is far from over. Not only are doctors still trying to figure out exactly what happened to Kaden [!], but re-gaining strength into his legs each day comes at a price.
"He gets shots in his stomach every day, twice a day, which is not something fun," Maurine Clymer said. "I don't enjoy giving them to him and I know he doesn't like getting them. Yet, he does it with a smile and we appreciate that. It could've been so much worse."
There is good news to share, Clymer has shown improvement each day and is expected to still play baseball, his favorite sport.
Until then, his role on the team is to continue progressing and inspire.
https://www.wtol.com/article/sports/...6-74079f8c9049
Litchfield motorcyclist suffers head injury in Palmyra crash
Police are investigating the collision of a motorcycle and SUV at the intersection of Routes 2 and 152 which sent two to the hospital, including one by LifeFlight of Maine.
September 4, 2022
Palmyra, Maine - A Litchfield man suffered a serious head injury in a collision with an SUV at the intersection of Routes 2 and 152 Saturday morning.
Kevin Pulk, 59, of Litchfield, was taken from the scene by ambulance to Sebasticook Valley Hospital in Pittsfield, then subsequently taken by LifeFlight helicopter to Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor for treatment of a serious head injury, according to a news release from Somerset County Sheriff’s Office.
Police said the investigation so far indicated Lisa Veazie, 61, of Scarborough, was driving a 2015 Honda CRV SUV heading north on Route 152, which is also known as Ell Hill Road. She stopped at the intersection of Routes 2 and 152 then allegedly pulled out in front of Pulk’s 1988 Honda Goldwing, which was headed east on Route 2.
Veazie was also taken to Sebasticook Valley Hospital, for a possible shoulder injury.
The crash remains under investigation but police said initially it appeared neither alcohol nor speed contributed to the crash.
https://www.centralmaine.com/2022/09...palmyra-crash/
Follow-up on an incident reported on July 24:
New footage shows Washington ferry crash that caused millions of dollars in damages
The state ferry that was damaged during a "hard landing" at the Fauntleroy Ferry Terminal on July 24 could be out of service for the rest of the year.
August 29, 2022
SEATTLE — New footage from Washington State Ferries (WSF) shows the moment of impact when the Cathlamet crashed into a terminal in west Seattle.
The state ferry that was damaged during a “hard landing” at the Fauntleroy Ferry Terminal on July 24 could be out of service for the rest of the year.
According to WSF, the monetary damage to the ferry is "well into the millions" and the damage to the Fauntleroy terminal structure will be "in the hundreds of thousands."
The Cathlamet was docking at the Fauntleroy ferry terminal when it collided with an offshore dolphin - a structure that guides docking ferries. The collision caused significant damage to the vessel.
The dolphin, primarily made from a wood piling with steel and concrete, made a sizeable tear in the ferry’s front right side. In addition to the ferry itself, several vehicles on the ferry were also damaged, with one trapped in the wreckage.
The crash was classified by the US Coast Guard as a "major marine casualty."
Following the crash, the captain of the ferry at the time of the collision resigned.
The entire crew was tested for drugs and alcohol. All tests came back negative, according to WSF.
No injuries were reported.
https://www.king5.com/article/news/l...0-8f6825a1f0aa
UNITED KINGDOM
Schoolboy, 8, saved mum's life when she collapsed and fell down flight of stairs
September 3, 2022
A schoolboy saved his mum’s life after she collapsed at the top of a flight of stairs.
Regan Deeley tumbled to the ground after losing consciousness and awoke with her eight-year-old son checking her vital signs.
Grayson Stewart sprung into action and called 999, helping paramedics to assess her condition by monitoring his mum’s pulse and breathing.
The 30-year-old has no idea why she passed out but knows it could have been very different without the quick actions of her boy.
She said: ‘I just woke up at about three o’clock in the morning and I felt a bit sick and dizzy.
‘I don’t remember anything after that until I woke up and my little boy was on the phone to the ambulance crew.
I was at the bottom of the stairs. I think I had fainted at the top of the stairs and taken a fall.
I had landed head first, so my body was still halfway up the stairs and my arms were trapped under me. I had quite a knock to the head.'
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...80839b5c19939a
ITALY
Illness in the field on his 14th birthday: the doctors save him, but now has guarded prognosis
September 3, 2022
On his fourteenth birthday he was on the pitch playing football with his friends. What was supposed to be an evening of sport and party, has turned into a drama, with the ending still to be written. The unfortunate protagonist is a boy from Verolavecchia who was on the pitch for a game last night. During the game the young man collapsed in a sudden illness. The team's doctors with extreme promptness undertook life-saving maneuvers pending the arrival of the doctors, managing to reanimate the boy. When the air ambulance arrived, the young man was rushed to the Civil of Brescia, where he is hospitalized in serious condition. The doctors' prognosis was guarded.
https://www.bresciatoday.it/cronaca/...lavecchia.html
Accident at Lake Segrino, 22 year old underwater in cardiac arrest
September 2, 2022
Unfortunately, the 22-year-old who remained underwater at Lake Segrino pours in very serious conditions. The terrible accident, yet another of this summer 2022, took place at 3.15 pm today, Friday 2 September 2022 in the municipality of Longone al Segrino. . Some passersby gave the alarm because a 22-year-old boy ended up underwater in the Segrino lake and did not resurface. An ambulance from the Sos di Canzo and a medical car rushed to the scene but the situation immediately appeared very critical: the boy was in fact in cardiac arrest. For this reason the Como helicopter rescue was also alerted. The dynamics of what happened are still to be clarified.
https://primalecco.it/cronaca/incide...esto-cardiaco/
He dives into the water at the lake and almost drowned
September 3, 2022
An afternoon with friends cost a 22-year-old dearly, who fell ill while he was swimming and disappeared underwater. The companions who were observing him from the shore jumped and fished him out, but the young man remained underwater for a few minutes and when he was brought back to shore his heart was no longer beating. To revive him, the doctors of the SOS di Canzo who gave him heart massage, despite his heart having started beating again, his conditions appeared desperate. Unconscious brought by the helicopter rescue to the hospital in Legnano.
https://www.ilgiorno.it/sondrio/cron...gare-1.8040191
-
Re: Coronavirus
Dachsie comment:
This is an important article. I may edit this later to add a few comments.
I notice the final paragraph in this article is ...
"Although all these rights are recognized under the Universal Declaration for Human Rights, the authors and The Lancet consider them insufficiently serious to dwell upon.
Dachsie submits to all thinking persons here that the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights IS "medical fascism" and is Bad Science.
Here's the rub!
https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/043/88/PDF/NR004388.pdf?OpenElement
ARTICLE 8
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy
by the competent national tribunals for acts
violating the fundamental rights granted him by
the constitution or by law.
http://www.jbs.org/artman/publish/article_318.shtml
The UN’s International Bill of Rights — which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights — is a case in point. The UDHR stipulates that "in the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law." Moreover, these rights, the UDHR explains in Article 8, are "granted [to everyone] by the constitution or law." (Emphasis added.) Under the ICCPR, the UN presumes to subject the God-given rights of freedom of religion, of speech, and of assembly — freedoms generally taken for granted by many Americans — to such regulation as the world body sees fit. This is, of course, in stark contrast to our own Bill of Rights, in which Congress is prohibited, without qualification, from infringing on rights such as the right to free speech and the right to keep and bear arms, and in which all powers not expressly delegated to the United States government nor prohibited to the States are presumed to appertain to the several states or to the people.
____________________________
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-...tm_source=push
The Experts Still Pushing Coerced Jabs
https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...51-800x469.jpg
The Experts Still Pushing Coerced Jabs
By David Bell September 6, 2022
Medical ethics is about protecting society from medical malfeasance and the self-interest of the humans whom we trust to manage health. It is therefore disturbing when prominent people, in a prominent journal, tear up the concept of medical ethics and human rights norms. It is worse when they ignore broad swathes of evidence, and misrepresent their own sources to do so.
On July 8th 2022, The Lancet published a ‘Viewpoint’ article online: “Effectiveness of vaccination mandates in improving uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the USA.” The article, which acknowledges the controversial nature of vaccine mandates, primarily concludes that coercing people to take a medical product, and reducing options for refusal, increases product uptake.
It further concludes that the best way to implement such mandates is for employers and educational institutions to threaten job security and the right to education.
The use of coercion goes against the established ethics and morals of Public Health, and could be argued to be anti-health. In this case, the article justifies it by stating that “the current evidence regarding the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in adults is sufficient to support mandates.” However, it offers scant evidence to back this assertion, and ignores all evidence to the contrary. They apparently consider the ability to work and support a family, or gain formal education, as something that is to be granted or taken away, not a human right.
The Lancet was once a credible journal with a rigorous policy of peer review. However, in this article it appears to have dropped its former standards, promoting medical fascism (coercion, threat and division to achieve compliance with authority) without insisting on a rigorous evidence base to justify such an approach. This suggests an attempt to normalize such approaches in mainstream public health.
Past experience has shown us where fascism behind a façade of public health can lead. The sterilization campaigns aimed at coloured and low-income populations of the US Eugenicist era, and the extensions of similar programs under Nazism in 1930s and 1940s Europe, relied heavily on the normalization of such approaches.
Leading public health voices from Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and other institutions championed a public health approach of sanitizing populations rather than environments, encouraging the idea of a tiered society where health ‘experts’ determine the rights and medical management of those deemed less worthy.
Avoiding the discomfort of evidence
The authors of this Lancet paper, ranging from academics and medical consultants to the daughter of a prominent politician, attempt to rewrite human rights in medicine as if precedent never existed. Their argument for coercion in mass vaccination recognizes that ‘vaccine mandates,’ whether issued by governments, employers or schools, all involve a loss of rights. No serious attempt is made to provide a medical justification for mass vaccination with a non-transmission-blocking vaccine.
The paper focuses on the premise that coercion, commonly considered a form of force, makes humans do things they would not otherwise do. Banning fellow humans from making their own health choices on pain of loss of normal participation in society has an impact on increasing vaccine uptake. This is hardly a revelation to any thinking human, but clearly important enough to justify publication in The Lancet.
The article links to evidence of vaccine mandates used for state school entry that show higher compliance when the right of religious and personal belief exemption is removed, or where onerous requirements for exemptions are put in place. Leaving ethical questions aside, the obvious lack of similarity between the authors’ predicate childhood vaccinations that block transmission and COVID-19 vaccines that have minimal impact on transmission, and may even promote it, is ignored. The one mandated adult vaccine predicate referenced in the article, the influenza vaccine, provides only a 2.5% reduction in pneumonia ‘when the (mandated) vaccine was well matched to circulating strains’ in the reference quoted.
When raising the sacking of non-vaccinated workers, the authors seem comfortable with the approach but coy in admitting its consequences. Their admission that “a few large US employers have terminated hundreds of workers for non-compliance references an article in Money magazine which actually paints a bleaker picture, characterizing it as a ‘great resignation.’
The authors will also have been aware of mass layoffs by large employers such as New York City (over 9,000 sacked or placed on leave), the US Department of Defense (DoD, which sacked 3,400), Kaiser Permanente (laid off 2,200), and the tens of thousands of staff lost from the UK care-home sector . Extrapolated across countries and society to actually provide credible data may have been too uncomfortable for the authors and Lancet editors.
High efficacy and safety are an obvious (though on their own, insufficient) prerequisite for any mandated product. This entire area of safety is dealt with by stating; “The current evidence on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in adults is sufficient to support mandates,” supported by a single study comparing vaccinated individuals 1-3 weeks and 3-6 weeks post-vaccination, revealing low levels of myocardial infarction, appendicitis and stroke.
The claim that “widespread administration in adults has quickly generated a large evidence base supporting the vaccines’ safety, including evidence from active surveillance studies” suggests that both the authors and The Lancet are unaware of the VAERS and Eudravigilance databases set up for exactly this purpose. No mention is made of growing data on myocarditis, menstrual irregularities, or the excess all-cause mortality and severe outcomes in vaccinated groups in the Pfizer randomised control trials on which the FDA emergency registration was based. Were The Lancet’s reviewers unaware of these sources?
The sole reference to vaccine efficacy discusses COVID-19 ventilated patient outcomes, It ignores the period to 14 days post-previous dose that Pfizer acknowledges can be associated with immune suppression. Fenton et al. have noted that classing a vaccinated person as unvaccinated in the first 14 days post-injection has profound impacts on vaccine effectiveness data.
Ignoring the awkwardness of reality
Post-infection immunity in the unvaccinated is a threat to arguments for mandates. The authors disingenuously state that “evidence suggests that the immunity produced by natural infection varies by individual, and that people with previous infection benefit from vaccination. New variants further undercut the case for adequacy of previous infection.
Two references are used here: one from a study in Qatar and the other a study from Kentucky. The Qatar study finds that “the protection of previous infection against hospitalization or death caused by reinfection appeared to be robust, regardless of variant,” whilst the Kentucky study found Covid reinfection was reduced by vaccination over a 2-month period in the months soon after vaccination, prior to the waning and then reversal of this protection as demonstrated in studies of longer duration elsewhere.
The vast breadth of evidence on relative effectiveness of post-infection immunity is ignored. Either the authors failed to read their references and are unaware of waning and of the vast literature on post-infection immunity, or they do not consider demonstration of efficacy important for coerced medical treatments.
In a previous era, or in a previously credible medical journal, an argument for coercion to support a medical procedure would have required very high standards of evidence of efficacy and safety. It is arguing for the abrogation of fundamental principles such as informed consent that are at the core of modern medical ethics. Failure to address well-known contrary data should prevent an article from even reaching the peer-review stage.
Degrading public health degrades society
We are left with a paper stating that coercion is a good path to increase compliance for a product that does not reduce community infection risk, and has potentially serious side effects. Ignoring both of these aspects of COVID-19 vaccines is a poor approach to justifying mass vaccination. The sole nod to any human rights concern – “Some objectors argue mandates represent undue encroachment on individual liberty” – is an interesting way to characterize removal of the right to income, education and the ability to socialize with others.
Although all these rights are recognized under the Universal Declaration for Human Rights, the authors and The Lancet consider them insufficiently serious to dwell upon.
Public health has been down this road before. We have seen the path society takes when basic public health principles are subverted to achieve an aim that some perceive as ‘good.’ We have also seen how most health professionals will comply, however horrific the actions involved. There is no reason to believe that this round of medical fascism will end differently.
We rely on medical journals such as The Lancet to apply at least the same standards to the purveyors of such doctrines as they do to others and demand a rational and honest evidence base. Anything less would raise legitimate questions as to the role the journal is taking in promoting these doctrines, and their place in a free, evidence-based and rights-respecting society.
This piece written in cooperation with Domini Gordon who coordinates the Open Science program for PANDA.
_________________________
Author
David Bell
David Bell, Senior Scholar at Brownstone Institute, is a public health physician and biotech consultant in global health. He is the former Program Head for malaria and febrile diseases at the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) in Geneva, Switzerland.
READ MORE
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cof...m_source=email
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/coffee-and-covid-tuesday-september?utm_source=email
Jeff Childers September 6, 2022
So.
You may have seen articles this weekend about a new peer-reviewed study of over 80,000 patients taking Ivermectin in Brazil, published in Cureus, titled “Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects.”
In short, and unsurprisingly, the researchers found a blockbuster NINETY-TWO PERCENT reduction in mortality from covid in the group taking Ivermectin as opposed to the group not taking the drug.
What you may not have heard is that they are now going after the lead researcher on the study, Flavio Cadegiani. Brazilian police indicted the scientist for “crimes against humanity,” for conducting a 2021 study on a chloroquine-like drug in the Amazon. Ironically, they alleged Flavio failed to get full informed consent from his patients.
I know. The irony. You can’t make this stuff up.
The charges are that 200 of Flavio’s 600 study patents died during the study, which sounds pretty awful. But Flavio defends that outcome, pointing out that at the time, hospitals in the Amazon were experiencing 50% covid mortality. So Flavio says his study actually showed a benefit. And he says his study was pre-approved by government agencies before he began.
It can’t possibly be that they are weaponizing law enforcement against the researcher because he wrote about Ivermectin. That would be bonkers. Be serious.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cof...m_source=email
💉 Communist sympathizer and activist Jane Fonda, 84, who famously labeled covid as “the best thing that ever happened to the Left,” and who enthusiastically advocated for vaccine mandates, announced this weekend she has been newly diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and has started chemo treatment.
Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma is a blood cancer, usually in the immune cells, that tends to grow in the lymph nodes. It’s another weird coincidence, given the nature of jab injuries.
Fonda says she remains optimistic and we wish her a speedy recovery.
-
Re: Coronavirus
Pennsylvania Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman
Age 53, Democrat candidate for U S Senator for Pennsylvania
Opponent is Dr. Oz
Date of Birth August 15, 1969
No article will tell us if Mr. Fetterman had the clot shot.
High probability he did get the clot shot.
He had a stroke and that is probably because of mRNA clot shot he got.
"Since suffering a stroke in May, Fetterman is essentially an invalid."
The news stories will not comment on the seriousness of his condition nor, of course, whether he got the clot shot.
I just provide this gossipy news speculation to show how the evil clot shots affect every aspect of our society including elections and politics.
A stroke and some other medical conditions can impair mental function. The people have a right to be represented in congress by someone who is mentally fully functioning. Major issues need to be vigorously argued and debated. This representation cannot happen if represenative's mental function is impaired.