Coronavirus

https://truthsocial.com/@DC_Draino/p...52194657914935

DC_Draino@DC_Draino

If this ain’t the realest thing I’ve read

https://static-assets-1.truthsocial....840bfcbde0.jpg

https://www.theepochtimes.com/cdc-ga...w_4711892.html

https://img.theepochtimes.com/assets...33-700x420.jpg

CDC Gave Facebook Misinformation About COVID-19 Vaccines, Emails Show

By Zachary Stieber
September 6, 2022 Updated: September 6, 2022


Summary of article:

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) passed misinformation to Facebook as the partners worked to combat misinformation, according to newly released emails, in the most recent example of CDC officials making false or misleading claims.

In a June 3 message, a Facebook official said the CDC had helped the company “debunk claims about COVID vaccines and children,” and asked for assistance addressing claims about the vaccines for babies and toddlers, including the claim that the vaccines were not effective.

Several weeks later, after U.S. regulators authorized the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines for young children and the CDC recommended them, a CDC official responded by offering unsupported information.

“Claims that COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective for children ages 6 months to 4 years are false and belief in such claims could lead to back vaccine hesitancy,” the CDC official wrote. The names of all of the officials mentioned in this story were redacted in the emails, which were released as part of ongoing litigation against the U.S. government.

“COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States are effective at protecting people, including children ages 6 months to 4 years, from getting seriously ill, being hospitalized, and even dying,” the CDC official added.

There’s no evidence that the vaccines are effective against severe illness and death in young children.

Source: theepochtimes.com

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=131133 the full article

Trump Just Scrooched The Pooch (Updated)

Posted on August 31, 2022 by State of the Nation

State of the Nation

For our many foreign speakers who read SOTN, there’s a quite crude American idiomatic expression — “screwed the pooch” — which translates to a HUGE and EPIC blunder (read: royal eff-up) that absolutely cannot be fixed in any way . You simply cannot undo screwing the pooch, right?!

Well, it appears that that is exactly what President Trump just did!

Alex Jones of InfoWars.com issued an Alt Media ultimatum of sorts (via video format) to Donald Trump in an effort to encourage him to completely and categorically disavow the catastrophic COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, which have seriously injured and killed countless Americans. Listen to that video as follows:
Why did Trump just terminate his political
career—FOREVER?!?! (Video)

If the sequence of events that Alex Jones described is entirely accurate, President Trump contacted Jones and communicated to him via a message — in no uncertain terms — his unequivocal presidential support for and personal backing of the Covid vaccines rolled out across the USA.

Trump’s exact quote regarding what was essentially the military deployment of highly experimental COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ via Operation Warp Speed is as follows:
Donald J. Trump’s Quote:
“No, I Back it. That’s it”
Conclusion

SOTN has also addressed this very same highly consequential issue with President Trump by way of the following “OPEN LETTER”:
President Donald Trump: You had better read this OPEN LETTER
before it’s too late.

In light Donald Trump’s closing his Covid ‘vaccine’ book with such finality, there’s only one reason that could possibly explain his remarkable resolve to commit political suicide.

Particularly in view of the perilous prosecutions that Trump is now facing, as well as the numerous persecutions he will be undergoing for the rest of his lifetime, there’s an untold back story here that must be revealed.

Check back here to read that exposé which should be posted at SOTN in the next few days. New information is now being discreetly disclosed that will validate the critical elements of the upcoming revelations regarding why Trump is so dead set to be forever known as the “Father of the Covid Vaccines”.

State of the Nation
August 31, 2022
Update 9/1/22

Here’s why Trump cannot stop his full support of the Covid vaccines…….
…no matter how many Americans are killed and/or seriously injured by
the extremely dangerous jabs.


This entry was posted in SOTN Special. Bookmark the permalink.

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=131134


SOTN: Alternative News, Analysis & Commentary
Revealing the True State of the Nation

embedded video

11:47 video runtime

This video is also viewable

https://banned.video/watch?id=630d460bee9b41339be42dcf




Why did Trump just terminate his political career—FOREVER?!?! (Video)

Posted on August 31, 2022 by State of the Nation

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=131133 the full article

Trump Just Scrooched The Pooch (Updated)

Posted on August 31, 2022 by State of the Nation

State of the Nation

For our many foreign speakers who read SOTN, there’s a quite crude American idiomatic expression — “screwed the pooch” — which translates to a HUGE and EPIC blunder (read: royal eff-up) that absolutely cannot be fixed in any way . You simply cannot undo screwing the pooch, right?!

Well, it appears that that is exactly what President Trump just did!

Alex Jones of InfoWars.com issued an Alt Media ultimatum of sorts (via video format) to Donald Trump in an effort to encourage him to completely and categorically disavow the catastrophic COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, which have seriously injured and killed countless Americans. Listen to that video as follows:
Why did Trump just terminate his political
career—FOREVER?!?! (Video)

If the sequence of events that Alex Jones described is entirely accurate, President Trump contacted Jones and communicated to him via a message — in no uncertain terms — his unequivocal presidential support for and personal backing of the Covid vaccines rolled out across the USA.

Trump’s exact quote regarding what was essentially the military deployment of highly experimental COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ via Operation Warp Speed is as follows:
Donald J. Trump’s Quote:
“No, I Back it. That’s it”
Conclusion

SOTN has also addressed this very same highly consequential issue with President Trump by way of the following “OPEN LETTER”:
President Donald Trump: You had better read this OPEN LETTER
before it’s too late.

In light Donald Trump’s closing his Covid ‘vaccine’ book with such finality, there’s only one reason that could possibly explain his remarkable resolve to commit political suicide.

Particularly in view of the perilous prosecutions that Trump is now facing, as well as the numerous persecutions he will be undergoing for the rest of his lifetime, there’s an untold back story here that must be revealed.

Check back here to read that exposé which should be posted at SOTN in the next few days. New information is now being discreetly disclosed that will validate the critical elements of the upcoming revelations regarding why Trump is so dead set to be forever known as the “Father of the Covid Vaccines”.

State of the Nation
August 31, 2022
Update 9/1/22

Here’s why Trump cannot stop his full support of the Covid vaccines…….
…no matter how many Americans are killed and/or seriously injured by
the extremely dangerous jabs.


This entry was posted in SOTN Special. Bookmark the permalink.

https://stateofthenation.co/?p=131134


SOTN: Alternative News, Analysis & Commentary
Revealing the True State of the Nation

embedded video

11:47 video runtime

This video is also viewable

https://banned.video/watch?id=630d460bee9b41339be42dcf




Why did Trump just terminate his political career—FOREVER?!?! (Video)

Posted on August 31, 2022 by State of the Nation

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...bvHLUujDaQ--~D

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1567182090403291137?s=20&t=Yu1LO3HfiJBd-9nzXypAlQ&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Disclose.tv


@disclosetv
NOW - Biden COVID advisor Ashish Jha believes "God gave us two arms — one for the flu shot and the other one for the COVID shot."

embedded video

0.05 video runtime

https://twitter.com/i/status/1567182090403291137

From
Jake Schneider
11:05 AM · Sep 6, 2022

https://odysee.com/@ChildrensHealthD...1-e43f60b9a4be

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...kXOyWeBfQA--~D

The CDC Lied to Us at the Sept 1 Meeting — Meryl Nass, M.D.

September 6th, 2022899 views

1:46 video runtime
0
Save
Repost
Children's Health Defense

@ChildrensHealthDefense
13 followers

‘We are at the lowest number of deaths per day since the pandemic started.’ — Meryl Nass, M.D. details the Sept 1st ACIP meeting which 13 members voted yes to authorize a new bivalent omicron booster despite having ZERO human testing data. WATCH THE FULL ‘Friday Roundtable’ on #CHDTV

⏯️ https://live.childrenshealthdefense....ble/xbPMqtMYgQ

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/cof...m_source=email

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1_1650x242.png

�� Finally! I’ve been waiting FOREVER for someone to do a comparative blood study of jabbed versus unjabbed blood, and yesterday, the Epoch Times — which has been tearing the vaccines a new one lately — ran a story headlined, “Study Found ‘Foreign Metal-Like Objects’ in 94 Percent of Sample Group of Symptomatic People Who Took mRNA Vaccines: Italian Doctors.”

The sub-head explains, “Among a study sample of over 1,000 people who developed symptoms, researchers found ‘graphene-family super-structures’.”

The study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research last month, and is titled “Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna.”

Out of 1,006 patients analyzed, researchers found only 58 had a normal blood profile. In other words, 95% of the thousand patients had abnormal blood following the injections. The researchers had access to pre-injection blood samples so were able to accurately compare the patients’ blood before/after.

This is a mild example of what they found in one of the 950 of cases:

Before Injection After Injection

The study explained the visible differences:

The right side image shows the same person’s blood one month after the first dose of Pfizer mRNA ‘vaccine’. Particles can be seen among the red blood cells which are strongly conglobated around the exogenous particles; the agglomeration is believed to reflect a reduction in zeta potential adversely affecting the normal colloidal distribution of erythrocytes as seen at the left. The red blood cells at the right are no longer spherical and are clumping as in coagulation and clotting.

In other words, in the “after” image, the patient’s blood cells look “sticky,” which is exactly what you don’t want. Blood cells should be smooth and easily slide off each other. Sticky blood leads to clumping which leads to clotting. Blood cells should also be nicely disc-shaped, but the “after” photo shows the blood cells assuming a variety of distorted shapes. Discs are designed to easily slide through veins and capillaries. When the cells are oddly and unevenly shaped, they can hook onto each other, blocking veins and capillaries.

There’s also a weird structure visible in the “after” picture. The researchers noted such abnormal structures were common in the samples. They found these aberrant structures in three main types: smooth “butterfly-like” structures, complex crystalline structures, and tubular structures. They also noted the presence of what appear to be graphene particles interacting with blood cells:

None of the structures or particulates were present in the patients’ “before” blood samples.

Here’s the study’s conclusion, which speaks for itself:

In conclusion, such abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection, from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying hemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerate foreign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures, is unprecedented. Such phenomena have never been seen before after any “vaccination” of the past.
In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow especially at the level of the capillaries. As far as we know, such self-aggregation phenomena have only been documented after the COVID-19 mRNA injections were first authorized, then mandated in some countries, and now are still being widely distributed in more than 12.3 billion doses (Bloomberg.com, 2022).
Further studies are needed to determine the precise nature and purposes of the foreign particles found in the blood drops of about 94% of the mRNA recipients we have studied. Where do they come from, and why are they in these injections?

I’d be remiss if I didn’t highlight the fact that the 1,006 study participants were all experiencing symptoms of vaccine injury, so these results aren’t evidence of what anyone is facing who took the injections and feels fine. But it’s very significant anyway, providing evidence of CAUSATION between the jabs and the variety of strange illnesses people are suddenly and unexpectedly experiencing after taking the shots.

In other words, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome might be a little less baffling now. This kind of study is easy to reproduce. If the researchers are wrong, they could be disproven in a few days. If only we had a giant, well-funded health bureaucracy that could follow up on something like this, dangit.

https://brownstone.org/articles/debi...tm_source=push

Debi Does Lockdowns

Debbie Lerman September 7, 2022

https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...743000107.jpeg

Excerpts

In three previous articles, I explored the puzzles of Dr. Deborah Birx’s appointment to the White House Coronavirus Response Task Force, her dubious scientific claims, and the people and groups she may or may not have worked with. In order to make sense of all the inconsistencies and incongruities that emerged, I hypothesized that Birx probably had ties to a group of military/intelligence/biosecurity actors who wanted to cover up a lab leak of an engineered virus – a group I am calling “the lab-leak cabal.”

It is my (as yet unproven) theory that the lab-leak cabal, for which Birx was a primary agent in the US government, wanted to impose strict lockdowns all over the world. Why they wanted lockdowns may include any or all of the following:

The cabal, in tandem with Chinese authorities, wanted to divert attention from their culpability in creating a deadly and highly infectious virus that escaped into the world’s population.

Population exposure to an enhanced pandemic potential pathogen was unprecedented, so they felt it had to be countered with unprecedented containment measures, on an unprecedented scale.

China said their lockdowns were working to stop the virus, and the cabal really wanted to believe China that lockdowns could work if they were strict and long enough.

They saw the pandemic as an opportunity to test their ideas and experiment with tactics for global crisis management, including lockdowns, rapid vaccine manufacture and distribution, real-time surveillance of individuals and entire populations, media manipulation and other novel solutions waiting for a catastrophic problem.

Whatever their motives, the goal seems very clear: Get as many countries as possible to lock down for as long as possible, at least until vaccines became available.

But locking down entire countries full of healthy populations was never an accepted or ethically/medically/scientifically supported pandemic response, and people might object to such draconian measures. So Birx+cabal had to create enough panic to make it happen.

...

CONCLUSION

Dr. Scott Atlas was appalled at what he considered gross errors and unethical behavior on the part of the White House Coronavirus Task Force doctors, led by Dr. Deborah Birx. He could not comprehend how medical professionals, like himself, could impose such disastrous policies.

The questions Atlas raises are ones with which I, too, struggled for much of the pandemic:

Why was the public not told about the steep age gradient of the virus?
Why were parents not reassured that their children were at lower risk from this virus than from the flu?
Why was natural immunity not just dismissed but suddenly considered an immoral “policy?”
Why were we testing and quarantining long after it was clearly useless in terms of slowing the spread?
Why were case counts, based on obviously bogus positive test results, considered a more important metric than hospitalizations and deaths?

I am deeply grateful to Atlas for his insights and inside reporting from the Task Force, because in raising these questions, he also inadvertently helped me come up with an answer: Everything Birx and the Task Force (and the lab-leak cabal I posit behind them) did was meant to foment fear, leading to compliance with unprecedented, untested, and predictably unsuccessful – not to mention enormously destructive – global lockdowns.

Atlas knew that fear was the tool they were using, but he could not understand how they could do so in good conscience. Nor can I.

“Using emotional distress as a tool to ensure greater adherence to government policy is immoral in public health, yet fear was consciously leveraged by those most influencing the citizenry.” (p. 348)

“Of all the cynical ways to manipulate people, fear was their best way to maintain lockdowns, despite the massive destruction from lockdowns that regular people saw before their own eyes.” (p.374)

Only through exposing the real motives behind this egregiously immoral behavior by global “public health” leaders that we can delegitimize their entire panic/lockdown enterprise, thereby hopefully lowering the chances of it happening again.

Author

Debbie Lerman

Debbie Lerman has a degree in English from Harvard. She is a retired science writer and a practicing artist in Philadelphia, PA.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...0-3347c129d9ac


09/07/22

Judge Gives Fauci 21 Days to Turn Over Emails With Social Media Giants

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered Dr. Anthony Fauci and the White House Press Secretary to hand over their communications with five social media giants. The ruling stems from a lawsuit alleging the Biden administration colluded with the companies to censor COVID-19 viewpoints that weren’t aligned with the administration’s official narrative.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered top-ranking Biden administration officials — including Dr. Anthony Fauci and White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre — to hand over their communications with five social media giants within 21 days.

The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed earlier this year by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeffrey Landry alleging the Biden administration colluded with Big Tech firms Twitter, Meta (Facebook’s parent company), Youtube, Instagram and LinkedIn to censor certain viewpoints under the guise of preventing the circulation of “misinformation” or “disinformation.”

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty in July ordered the Biden administration to swiftly produce records requested by the plaintiffs as part of the discovery process.

On Aug. 2, Schmitt and Landry filed discovery requests seeking documents and information from the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and its director, Fauci; White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre; Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy; and former Disinformation Governance Board executive director Nina Jankowicz.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs also sent discovery requests to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and its director, Jen Easterly; the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS); and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The requests resulted in a cache of documents revealing more than 50 Biden administration workers and 12 U.S. agencies had been involved in a censorship push over social media.

However, some government officials — including Fauci — refused to provide records or answer any questions posed by the plaintiffs, claiming the communications were protected under executive privilege.

The government claimed Fauci should not be required to answer the plaintiff’s questions or provide records related to his capacity as NIAID director or related to his capacity as Biden’s chief medical officer. Additionally, the government sought to withhold records and responses from Jean-Pierre.

Judge Doughty on Tuesday broke the stalemate by ruling that both Fauci and Jean-Pierre must comply with the interrogatories and hand over the requested records.

“First,” Judge Doughty said in the ruling, “the requested information is obviously very relevant to Plaintiffs’ claims. Dr. Fauci’s communications would be relevant to Plaintiffs’ allegations in reference to alleged suppression of speech relating to the lab-leak theory of COVID-19’s origin, and to alleged suppression of speech about the efficiency of masks and COVID-19 lockdowns. Jean-Pierre’s communications as White House Press Secretary could be relevant to all of Plaintiffs’ examples.”

According to Judge Doughty:

“Government Defendants are making a blanket assertion of all communications to social media platforms by Dr. Fauci, and Jean-Pierre based upon executive privilege and presidential communications privilege.

“Plaintiffs concede they are not asking for any internal White House communications, but only external communications between Dr. Fauci and/or Jean-Pierre and third-party social media platforms.

“This Court believes Plaintiffs are entitled to external communications by Jean-Pierre and Dr. Fauci in their capacities as White House Press Secretary and Chief Medical Advisor to the President to third-party social media platforms.”

Judge Doughty ordered Fauci and Jean-Pierre to comply within 21 days, and said Fauci must provide complete answers to questions about his role as NIAID director.

In response to the ruling, a Biden administration official defended the administration’s actions, telling Fox News, “As we have said over and over again since the beginning of the administration in our battle against COVID-19, it has been critical for the American people to have access to factual, accurate, science-based information.”

“We believe in and we support freedom of speech, and we also believe it is important for all media platforms, including social media, to represent factual scientific information and combat misinformation and disinformation that can cost lives,” the official concluded.

However, Mary Holland, president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense, told The Defender the ruling is “really good news.”

Holland said:

“Up until now, Dr. Fauci has operated under this cloak of ‘untouchableness,’ thinking he has been above the law. He likely didn’t expect his emails to be made public.

“We can only imagine what this tranche of emails will likely reveal about Dr. Fauci’s bare-knuckled censorship — it won’t be pretty.”

Holland said Judge Doughty’s ruling was “even-handed” because he “granted some of the Plaintiff Attorney Generals’ discovery requests and denied others.”

For instance, Doughty denied the Plaintiffs’ request that the HHS conduct a search for relevant records among its 80,000 employees because it would be “unduly burdensome.” However, he said the HHS employees identified in the documents from Meta needed to respond to the discovery requests.

Holland added:

“Most importantly, the court ordered that Dr. Fauci’s and Karine Jean-Pierre’s external emails to social media platforms must be produced by September 27, within 21 days of the ruling.

“Stay tuned and get the popcorn. Those emails likely will reveal how the censorship has worked — and the path to ending it now.”

Jenin Younes, litigation counsel for the New Civil Liberties Alliance and a lawyer for some of the Plaintiffs, told The Epoch Times:

“We know from the previous round of discovery that efforts to censor the speech of those who disagree with the government on covid policy have come from the top.

“Americans deserve to know Anthony Fauci’s participation in this enterprise, especially since he has publicly demanded that specific individuals, including two of our clients, Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, be censored on social media.”

“It is time for Dr. Fauci to answer for his flagrant disregard for Americans’ constitutional rights and civil liberties,” Younes added.

New Civil Liberties Alliance in August joined the lawsuit, stating in its case summary that the suit also represents epidemiologists and co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, as well as Dr. Aaron Kheriaty and Jill Hines.

Plaintiffs push to interrogate other Biden officials, file amended complaint

As part of Tuesday’s ruling, Judge Doughty also granted the plaintiffs’ request to question additional government officials based on their review of the records obtained from their previous discovery request.

Although Fauci and Jean-Pierre did not comply with the initial discovery request, the government records that were obtained “unveiled an army of federal censorship bureaucrats, including officials arrayed at the White House, HHS, DHS, CISA, the CDC, NIAID, the Office of the Surgeon General, the Census Bureau, the FDA, the FBI, the State Department, the Treasury Department, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission,” the NCLA said in a Sept. 1 press release.

“Communications show these federal officials are fully aware that the pressure they exert is an effective and necessary way to induce social-media platforms to increase censorship. The head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency even griped about the need to overcome social-media companies’ ‘hesitation’ to work with the government,” NCLA said.

The defendants identified 45 officials across five federal agencies as the officials who communicated with social media companies about misinformation and censorship.

However, email and other documents provided by Meta, Twitter and Google showed several other officials — including officials at other federal agencies and the White House — were involved in the effort.

Moreover, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently disclosed that the FBI contacted him about disinformation before the 2020 election — and that Facebook suppressed the circulation of the first Hunder Biden laptop story.

“With each of these new revelations, Plaintiffs have approached Defendants and requested that they supplement their discovery responses to include responsive communications from the newly disclosed federal officials,” the Plaintiffs said in a recent filing.

“Defendants have refused to do so, on the grounds that none of these newly discovered officials have been sued or served with discovery as yet, and that it would be unduly burdensome to identify and produce their communications.”

The plaintiffs asked to file an amended complaint, allowing them to name all the additional officials as defendants to address the issues.

The amended complaint, they said, will allow them to request records and information from each of the officials who were not initially disclosed by the Biden administration.

Judge Doughty on Tuesday gave the plaintiffs 30 days to file an amended complaint with the additional agencies and/or individuals.

CHD awaits decision in similar lawsuit against Facebook

Children’s Health Defense in August 2020 brought a similar case against Meta Platforms Inc., also known as Facebook, its “independent fact-checkers” and Mark Zuckerberg for alleged collusion with the U.S. government in censoring the American public.

The CHD lawsuit alleges Facebook entered into an agreement with the White House to censor an entire category of speech, de-platformed CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and removed CHD’s “donate” button on Facebook, directing traffic instead to a third-party fact-checking organization that solicits donations.

CHD filed an amended complaint in December 2020. The federal district court in the Northern District of California dismissed the case on June 29, 2021.

Judge Susan Illston, in a 45-page decision, said CHD’s allegations — that Facebook is effectively a “state actor” on behalf of the federal government and engaged in false advertising and racketeering — failed to state legal claims.

CHD appealed. After arguing against the motion to dismiss, CHD now awaits a decision.


Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., is a reporter and researcher for The Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa. She holds a Ph.D. in Communication Studies from the University of Texas at Austin (2021), and a master's degree in communication and leadership from Gonzaga University (2015). Her scholarship has been published in Health Communication. She has taught at various academic institutions in the United States and is fluent in Spanish.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...CSVmxgGetg--~D

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...0-3347c129d9ac


09/07/22
•
COVID

55% of Babies, Toddlers Had ‘Systemic Reaction’ After COVID Vaccine, CDC Survey Shows

More than 55% of children ranging in age between 6 months and 2 years had a “systemic reaction” after their first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, according to data released Sept. 1 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

By
The Epoch Times

By Margaret Menge

More than 55% of children ranging in age between 6 months and 2 years had a “systemic reaction” after their first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, according to data released Sept. 1 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

In addition, almost 60% had a reaction to the second dose of the Moderna vaccine, in the CDC survey of more than 13,000 children.

A systemic reaction is a response beyond the injection site.

While the most common systemic reactions were fatigue, fever, irritability and crying, parents of more than 6% of the children in the study said their child was unable to perform normal activities after the second dose of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine.

The CDC collected the data through a program called V-Safe — a smartphone-based monitoring system that operates through an app that parents download to their phones.

Between June 18 and Aug. 21, parents of more than 10,000 young children reported reactions to the CDC through V-Safe in the seven days after their child had received a COVID-19 vaccination.

Parents of 8,338 children ages 6 months to 2 years who received the Moderna vaccine reported information through V-Safe, with 55.7% reporting a systemic reaction after the first dose and about 58% after the second dose.

For the Pfizer vaccine, parents of 4,749 children ages 6 months to 2 years submitted reports showing that 55.8% had a systemic reaction after the first dose and about 47% after the second dose of the vaccine.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...n-1024x550.jpg

moderna pfizer omicron babies young children
Credit: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The most frequently reported reactions for children 6 months to 2 years were irritability or crying, sleepiness and fever. The most common reactions for children aged 3 to 5 years were injection site pain, fatigue and fever.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...2-1024x541.jpg

moderna pfizer omicron young children 2
Credit: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Health impacts

The data also showed a more serious reaction category labeled “any health impact.”

About 10% of all children 6 months to 2 years were reported to have a “health impact” after getting their first dose of either the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine.

For the Moderna vaccine, slightly more children had a health impact after the second dose; for the Pfizer vaccine, it was slightly less.

The information was presented to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on Sept. 1 as part of an overview of all data related to the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

In addition to V-Safe, data was presented summarizing reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Data Link (VSD), which includes data from several large health maintenance organizations in the United States.

All three systems look at the safety of vaccines after they’ve already gone to market and have been administered to large numbers of people.

Tom Shimabukuro, the head of the CDC’s vaccine safety team, headed the presentation and told committee members that no “statistical signals” of COVID-19 vaccine reactions were found for young children in the VSD data.

Shimabukuro also said that systemic reactions were “commonly reported” following vaccines.

However, other medical professionals such as Dr. Meryl Nass of Children’s Health Defense have expressed caution over the reported reactions, pointing to the high number of systemic reaction reports among very young children.

She told The Epoch Times on Sept. 2 that she was questioning why the government doesn’t collect and present more information on these cases.

“That stuff is not considered by the CDC to be very important … It’s assumed that all those side effects go away after a few days and leave the people perfectly well,” she said, mentioning the fevers and fatigue.

“Those reactions may, in fact, be harbingers of more serious reactions, but nobody to my knowledge has published anything looking at whether these acute local or systemic reactions are indicators of a later problem.”

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy's New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

The FDA approved the emergency-use authorization of COVID-19 vaccines for children aged 6 months to 5 years on June 17.

According to the CDC, about 599,460 children in that age group have received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and about 440,770 have received the Moderna vaccine.

From June 18 through Aug. 31, about 1 million doses of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were administered to children in this age group.

In a review of the VAERS data on young children from June 18 to Aug. 31, the CDC had 496 reports of adverse events for children aged 6 months to 4 years who received the Pfizer vaccine and 521 for children aged 6 months to 5 years who received the Moderna shot, with an adverse event defined as a possible side effect.

More than 98% of reports were for what the CDC considers non-serious events.

There are 220 reports of persons aged 5 months to 5 years of age being taken to the emergency room following a COVID-19 vaccine.

In one case involving a 2-year-old boy in Arizona, the VAERS report says he was given the Pfizer vaccine on July 29 and on July 30 had a “life-threatening episode.”

The report lists his symptoms as “clammy skin and vomiting leading (8 minutes) to difficulty breathing.” The boy “turned blue,” was “limp” and “non-responsive” and “fully stopped breathing for two minutes,” according to the report.

He was revived after chest compressions.

Reprinted with permission from The Epoch Times.

Margaret Menge is a freelance journalist who has written for the Columbia Journalism Review, New York Observer, Miami Herald and The American Conservative, among other publications.

__________________

Dachsie comment:

"Parents of 8,338 children ages 6 months to 2 years who received the Moderna vaccine "

"in the CDC survey of more than 13,000 children"

What parents would offer their very young child to receive an experimental drug?

Why would parents allow their child that had a "systemic reaction" to the first shot allow the child to be given the second shot?

I honestly would like to understand this better but that information is very controlled and mostly unavailable.

Are these parents paid dollars to offer their child and if so, how much.