Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
2 new(ish) Jim Rizolli interviews with prominent revisionists. I really like last month's with Bradley Smith (who's apparently in his last days-- lung cancer, lymphoma, & getting western allopahthic poison/burn "treatment" :rolleyes:); they discuss Smith's former activism in placing holohoax-truth print ads in university newspapers. Smith was also on Donahue show with David Cole, who walked off the set iin the middle of the show.
also check Rizolli's YT channel and (his brother?) Joe Rizolli's channel - also read reviews of Bradberry's book @ The Myth Of German Villainy.
The Defamation Experts™, ADL's action plan re combating Smith's uni campus newspaper ads:
Quote:
Table of Contents
Introduction
.................................................. .................................................. ...........................
......... 5
Anti-Defamation League
.................................................. .................................................. ............ 6
Hillel: The Foundation for Jewish Campus Life
.................................................. ......................... 6
SECTION I: Holocaust Denial
.................................................. .................................................. .... 7
What is Holocaust Denial?
.................................................. .................................................. ........... 7
SECTION II: Holocaust Denial, Campus
Newspapers, and the First Amendment
............. 11
Campus Editors and the First Amendment
.................................................. .................................. 11
Advertising Policies
.................................................. .................................................. .................... 11
Statements from Campus Newspapers on Publishing Holocaust Denial
......................................... 12
SECTION III: Taking Action Against Holoca
ust Denial in Newspaper Advertisements
...... 16
Preventing Holocaust Denial
from Disturbing Your Campus
.................................................. ....... 16
Strategizing a Response When the Ad is Published
.................................................. ...................... 17
Sample Letter to the Editor
.................................................. .................................................. .... 19
Case Studies
.................................................. .................................................. ...........................
.... 21
APPENDIX I: Resources on the Holocaust
.................................................. .............................. 24
Web-based Resources
.................................................. .................................................. ................. 24
Text Resources
.................................................. .................................................. ...........................
25
APPENDIX II: ADL Background on Bradley Smith
.................................................. ................. 26
Bradley Smith: Ideology/Motivations
.................................................. ........................................... 27
Bradley Smith: Extremist Affiliations
.................................................. ........................................... 28
Bradley Smith: Background
.................................................. .................................................. ........ 28
Bradley Smith: In His Own Words
.................................................. ............................................... 33
This following HERETIC had the audacity to write "The Myth Of German Villainy"
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lc-l5AYu6fg/mqdefault.jpg
1:09:34
Ben Bradberry interview by Jim Rizoli
a relative quickie produced by Bradley Smith:
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re this article just reposted at James Tracy's memoryholeblog;
January 17, 2016
Teaching 9/11 to Conspiracy Theorists 12
I commented:
Consider what resulted in SoCal's Rialto School District when a teacher gave his 8th graders a Critical Thinking assignment focused on
The Holocaust™, LOL :D
Startpage search:
Holocaust Rialto school
^ Educators shalt not mess with societies' rulers' malevolent foundational myths!
Jan 16 AFP article with 14 min Gahary/Fetzer interview embedded inside,
http://americanfreepress.net/firing-...k-is-cowardly/
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...ey-768x445.jpg
Turning Tables on Holocaust Hoaxers
January 28, 2016 Mike Walsh 2 Comments
Holocaust hysteria is now reaching shrieking intensity. When reading the latest peculiar claims one feels the need to put one’s hands over one’s ears to keep the din down. Each time we open a newspaper, magazine or turn on the news we expose ourselves to an incessant cascade of increasingly bizarre claims.
Tedious though this is, we remember that every cloud has a silver lining. Clear thinking is never associated with manic anxiety. The fraudulent holocaust narrative is panicking. Promoters of this obscene money-making racket are no longer thinking clearly.
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...1819759995.jpg
Israel held a Miss Holocaust Survivor Beauty Pageant in 2015.
Unhappily for holocaust supporters their hysterical ranting now has the opposite effect to that intended. Mainstream media readership suffers holocaust fatigue. Besides, it was all a long time ago and Malice in Wonderland is losing its credibility and its relevancy. Furthermore, agitated ‘holocaust denial’ claims actually attract the curious and fuel desire to investigate further. Curiosity opens up an internet-based Pandora’s Box which the fraudsters wish to remain closed.
Here then is opportunity for real historians, freethinkers and fraud investigators to ramp up the rhetoric. This is the time for organised collective responsibility that has at its core a strategy and a narrative.
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...p18_Staff3.jpg
Bradley Smith ran essay-length ads in 17 college papers in ’91-’92.
Think of what we can do now.Firstly, the term ‘holocaust denial’ is an expression used by advocates of the holocaust industry. Like the term ‘Nazi’ it should never be part of the freethinker’s narrative. It is like going to the front your only defence being the hope that you’ll catch the enemy’s hand grenades and hurl them back at him. I wish keypads would automatically replace holocaust denier with holocaust investigator.
Secondly, Napoleon Bonaparte taught us that ‘the best form of defence is attack.’ Internet news resources now carry much more weight than does that of mainstream media. We are all columnists now and 65% of the open market is ours to play with. Apart from using the above tactics our response to the fraudulent holocaust should shift to debate on undeniable holocausts. This would turn the tables decisively and put mainstream media on the defensive.
http://renegadetribune.com/wp-conten...204_140814.jpg
We have are told endlessly about the Holocaust, but nothing is said of the Holodomor.
Using the power of the internet a new front should be opened up. This front will expose Jewish and Capitalist responsibility for the enslavement and slaughter of 70 to 100 million mostly European Christians. The blitzkrieg would seriously weaken the case of the holocaust frauds.
Putting them on the defensive it would draw attention to their double-standards and expose their guilt for heinous crimes on a scale that relegates the fanciful 6-million to the side-lines. By taking part in this rapid deployment all freethinkers could soon have the holocaust industry wishing they had never raised the holocaust industry narrative in the first place.
http://renegadetribune.com/turning-t...caust-hoaxers/
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Trailblazing Connecticut course is blueprint for future Holocaust education
2016-02-02 23:42
From: timesofisrael.com
http://www.redicecreations.com/ul_im...holo-large.jpg
As UN discussion seeks best means to connect to future generations, new high school program uses current events to help students better understand horrors of the past
As the Holocaust recedes further into history and as the era of the living witness closes, educators and researchers are grappling with how best to teach it to future generations.
“We need to create a real bond with history, to give it a human story rather than just present a series of frightening pictures of piles of bodies. We must make it relevant. We must constantly engage students, delivering the subject in bite-sized bursts,” said Jane Jacobs-Kimmelman, director of the International Relations Department at the International School for Holocaust Studies at Yad Vashem.
Jacobs-Kimmelman was one of several researchers and educators to participate in a discussion at the United Nations on Thursday about the future of Holocaust research and education. Of concern is how to make the Holocaust, which occurred more than 70 years ago, relevant to today’s students, particularly in places where there are few Jewish students or where perhaps students aren’t aware of their grandparents or great-grandparents’ stories.
Since 2013, laws mandating the inclusion of the Holocaust in curricula have been on the books in Austria, France, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. In the US, individual states decide on curriculum content. To date Holocaust education is mandatory in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.
While Connecticut doesn’t mandate Holocaust education, schools include the Holocaust as part of the unit on World War II. Beyond that, many schools offer a variety of history electives on the subject.
At Weston High School in Connecticut, the course “Facing History and Ourselves” provides a blueprint for the future of Holocaust education. The semester-long history course, for juniors and seniors, uses current events to link students to the past, said Weston Public Schools social studies teacher Jennifer B. Klein.
...
Read the rest: timesofisrael.com
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Re this article just reposted at James Tracy's memoryholeblog;
January 17, 2016
Teaching 9/11 to Conspiracy Theorists 12
I commented:
Consider what resulted in SoCal's Rialto School District when a teacher gave his 8th graders a Critical Thinking assignment focused on
The Holocaust™, LOL :D
Startpage search:
Holocaust Rialto school
^ Educators shalt not mess with societies' rulers' malevolent foundational myths!
Jan 16 AFP article with 14 min Gahary/Fetzer interview embedded inside,
http://americanfreepress.net/firing-...k-is-cowardly/
The above comment which I submitted to Dr. Tracy's memoryholeblog thread approval queue, was rejected. :(
Yesterday in my UC Davis prof teaching students about weaponized PC, NWO thread, I remarked about Dr. Tracy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
[...]
In one interview
(which? http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/s...20%2820%29.gif), DH matter-of-factly mentioned Sandy Hoax as a staged/fake event, with a gun grab & pharma-friendly agenda-- the same avenue of inquiry which recently got "tenured" prof James Tracy run out of Florida Atlantic University
(listen to: James Tracy on Jeff Rense). And Dr. Tracy was also notably silent on dajooz problem too; although it was always interesting when he'd have a podcast guest who was joo-wise & vocal, like John Friend, and Tracy would play the "neutral good listener" without overtly agreeing or disagreeing, only asking questions.
1 hour each:
Dr. Tracy interviews JFriend:
Interview 68: John Friend
Steve Johnson interviews JTracy, 2nd half hour is all callers banging on djoo problem, listen to how Tracy responds:
The People Speak with Steve Johnson 2015.08.18
So a similar thing happened to me today (Sat Feb 6); in JTracy's latest blog entry: Gangstalking is Murder, I submitted to his approval queue a comment pointing to a year old Kevin Barrett interview with guest Steve Johnson of Houston, who told off GHWB in a pizza restaurant: “You murderous Zionist piece of s**t!”... videoed it, and uploaded to YT where it went viral. And he was gangstalked afterwards at his apartment. This interview is inside: "Greg Johnson: Why I cussed out Bush to his face – and don’t like Ron or Rand much either _ on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad Radio"
Perfectly on-topic thing to comment, right? Well, around ~12 hours later now, and it appears this comment was rejected (a couple other new comments did since appear). :( I'm afraid the reason is prolly the same as why my holohoax/Rialto school assignment comment was rejected... it's obvious from the Steve Johnson show description in the link above, that there's blunt talk about dajooz problem in this show, and/or "zoinism" problem (the "which 'joo/zio' language to use?" question is also discussed in the same interview).
So I say, shame on Dr. Tracy... he's already suffered the end of his career now, at least at FAU, but I think he'll find himself blacklisted from virtually all universities, resulting for his Sandy Hoax Truth activism; so that "threat" no longer hangs over him. But yet, he's still censoring comments which, even in roundabout ways, shine light the djooz problem. :(
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
I actually watched this 1h 38m Jim Rizoli interview with Mark Weber within a day or so of its Feb 11 publication;
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0cvCg4_wFD0/mqdefault.jpg
Jim Rizoli Mark Weber Interview Feb 2016
...but notice, I didn't make a bee line to this thread to repost it as normal. Coz Weber showed how sold out, compromised, co-opted he is; and I didn't want to "promote him." Says (he believes...:rolleyes:) there were limited homicidal "gassings" at this and that obscure work/detention/transfer camp. Says he estimates perhaps ~4M jooz died... touts how he agrees with (the new...:rolleyes:) David Irving on this & that, seeking cred-by-association.
Well thing is; Irving changed his public tune on the holohoax, after dajooz uncharacteristically/"mercifully" :rolleyes: early-released him from an Austrian prison term after only 13 months of his 3 year sentence... and whuduyuhknow; Irving's been (publicly) singing from the kosher 6M/gas-chambers song sheet since. And, albeit without such a publicly visible/obvious "deal" as Irving's, Weber cites his "agreement" with the (formerly, pre-"deal") legendary David Irving... anticipating that people will imagine the cred & integrity of the pre-deal Irving, NOT the "New Irving."
What's nice about the above Rizoli interview of Weber is, Rizoli doesn't let him off easy... insists on hearing what physical/forensic evidence Weber has for his proclaimed holohoax beliefs; and Weber squirms... citing this-n-that (fabricated) "diary" and such, and oh yeah, the New David Irving...:rolleyes:
I've seen Carolyn Yeager on the attack against Weber now & again over the past few years; you can search her site for "Weber." Her grievances mainly point to how "ineffective/do-nothing" he's been as director of the Institute for Historical Review (IHR). Yeager just wrote this short opening, as a pointer to a new article by Hadding Scott, published at Commitee for Open Discussion of the Holohoax (CODOH)... well worth your time, as a companion reader to go with the Rizoli/Weber interview above.
Critical review of Jim Rizoli's video interview of Mark Weber published at CODOH
Published by carolyn on Sun, 2016-02-28 12:52
http://carolynyeager.net/sites/defau...?itok=5TgInXWWl
Corrected edition cover of the book
Ernst Zundel was prosecuted for in the
1988 Canadian "False News" trial.
Hadding Scott's critical review is titled:
Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker
An aid to comprehension for viewers of Jim Rizoli's interview of Mark Weber
Scott's opening explains why he thinks his review is necessary.
Anybody who has not taken a particular interest in Historical Revisionism is likely to find little to criticize in Mark Weber's statements to Jim Rizoli in this interview. Such a viewer will likely be impressed that Weber speaks well of Holocaust Revisionists and defends their right to raise "questions."
If Mark Weber were a professor at a university or a mainstream public figure, that would be a net benefit. The problem is that Mark Weber does not occupy any such position but is the director of the Institute for Historical Review. He is supposed to be a leader in Holocaust Revisionism, not a spectator benevolently defending that movement's free-speech rights.
Read Part One here.
Category Holocaust Revisionism
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
I see I forgot to post this Red Ice Radio interview with Jim Rizoli from Jan 29, but just as well coz Henrik only has the 1st hour free. But I noticed at Jim's brother Joe Rizoli's YT channel, there's a YT of the whole ~2hr show. Full desc & first hour (only) MP3 inside this red ice link,
Jim Rizoli - What Really Happened at Auschwitz? - Hour 1
and here's the whole 2 hr show on YT; I reco' the 2nd hour more, if you're already familiar with the basic holes in the kosher holohoax story. But first hour has some interesting introductory stuff about Jim & his brother's story.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/iSE97FmXLyc/mqdefault.jpg
2:06:05
Red Ice Network interview with Jim Rizoli
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
63 min podcast hosted by GSUS member The Ogster. I'm about 3/4 through; heavy on the holohoax story & truther persecution so far. :)
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
2 most recent @ Yeagers; 1st is continuation of my Rizoli/Weber post 3 replies up:
Part 2 of "Mark Weber: Squishy Semi-Revisionist Shirker" now at CODOH
Published by carolyn on Tue, 2016-03-08 17:31
http://carolynyeager.net/sites/defau...?itok=soQ4MmDj
Weber: "My view about the gas-chambers or gassings is the same essentially as David Irving. And I believe that Jews were gassed. Yes."
An aid to comprehension for viewers of Jim Rizoli's interview of Mark Weber (10 February 2016)
In the first part, I showed that Mark Weber, in his interview with Jim Rizoli (10 February 2016), consistently tried to avoid acknowledging any findings of Holocaust Revisionism, and also tried to conceal his past acknowledgment of such findings. In this part, the focus is on Weber's attempts to justify his retreat from Holocaust Revisionism.
Mark Weber gives several arguments to justify his current refusal to support the revisionist findings that he once supported in regard to the Holocaust. I was able to discern the following, somewhat contradictory arguments, listed here in ascending order of absurdity:
1. The question of whether the Holocaust-story is true or false is no longer relevant.
2. Although the truth about the Holocaust is relevant (contradicting the previous point) it should not be relevant!
3. There is no point in disputing the Holocaust because Jews really were gassed.
Please continue reading at CODOH
Tags
Institute for Historical Review,
Gas Chambers,
Aktion Reinhardt Camps,
David Irving
Category
Holocaust Revisionism
______________________
and this one is re Yeager's ongoing irrational anti-Shlomo-ic hate-filt poisekution of this poor innocent Nobel award winning holohoax actor & fiction writer....
Latest post at "Elie Wiesel Cons The World"
Where was tattoo-less Elie Wiesel in 1944 if not at Auschwitz?
http://carolynyeager.net/sites/defau...?itok=wQc8qDYk
IT’S HARD TO BELIEVE, after all I’ve written, that some people are still saying to me, “You shouldn’t say Wiesel has admitted he doesn’t have a tattoo, because what if it turns out he does. Then you’ll look foolish and set back revisionism.”
Turns out? How long do we wait for something to “turn out?”
Wiesel will be 88-years-old on September 30th of this year. Very few human bodies are able to carry on after their 90th year, so, without a consensus opinion from the revisionist community, we are looking at the prospect of an eternal “We’ll never know” pasted over the Elie Wiesel tattoo question. Naturally, this is what Wiesel supporters want, but should revisionists be content with never going beyond that, continuing to fear there will come a time he will dramatically pull up his sleeve for the cameras?
He’s already done so and we have the result in the image at right.
And what don’t people understand about logic? One doesn’t need a University course in logic to use common sense. Two plus two adds up to four – we don’t need a calculator to prove it, our fingers can tell us. What should we think of those who would say “But what if it doesn’t? What if our fingers turn out to be wrong?” Continue reading at Elie Wiesel Cons The World
Newsletter
Carolyn Yeager
Category
Elie Wiesel
