new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

I gather P. Klein (joosh name!) was sort of the heavy behind last December's WNTTASH docu. Haven't listened yet but the Klein interviews I've heard have been good. :)


Wednesday, August 5, 2015

The Real Deal w/James Fetzer Ep 86 Peter Klein Co-Producer of We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook

---

Interesting bit around 1h 16m in this interview.

Lesser known Sandy Hook anomalies:
Funds & Charities
Kenneth Feinberg overseeing funds distribution (Sandy Hook, BP Gulf disaster, 9/11, Boston Bombing, Virginia Tech Shooting, Penn State Abuse Scandal, Aurora Shooting)

I knew djoo oversaw the 9/11 bribe-for-silence fund, and BP; but didn't know about all the other FFs...

Thread: BP doesn't pay fisherman/clean-up worker claims; pays stripper $80K

http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/def...h_Feinberg.jpg
Ken Feinberg: Gov.-appointed admin.
of the BP Deepwater Horizon Disaster
Victim Compensation Fund
Photo: Wikipedia

For those interested, here are a couple of recent shows Fetzer did on SH.

This one is w/a guy from Australia who goes through slides from the Lanza home and the school and points out the obvious staging:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-MQUePczdo

And this one is w/the same guy, going over all the fake documents related to SH (second half of show):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwlTnx-ur9U


Here's the latest from Prof Tracy http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/09...ublic-opinion/

Just found the comment below posted in response to yet another Spingola show on SH (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/08/...s-8102015.html). I actually listened to the video and it does sound like there is a voice match between the SH 911 calls supposedly from inside the school and Carlee Soto (fake sister of fake dead teacher Victoria Soto), Jackie Barden (fake mother of fake kid) and Pastor Solomon.

Quote:

---

Andrea Mitchell said...

---

Quote:

---

I'll post this again

So can anyone with a straight face tell me that this is NOT Jackie Barden and Carlee Soto heard on the supposed 911 call?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXXCUtD1308

Can we get some voice recognition experts to examine this evidence, i am willing to bet money
this can be proven forensically to within at least 90% accuracy
that these voices are a match

I tried to contact the Swiss scientist,Professor Hervé Bourlard who analyzed the fakeed Bin Laden tapes released by Rita Katz and her mossad front SITE intel group and determined with a 95% accuracy rate that they were indeed fake but i got no response

http://www.theguardian.com/world/200...aida.terrorism

They said it was proven to within a 95% accuracy rate for the Bin Laden tapes and this was 13 years ago , the quantum leaps in computer technology in the last 13 years means we should be able to get an even more conclusive and accurate result than the 95%

i am sure this could be proven forensically if we could get some help from someone with some technical expertise like the Swiss professor or perhaps someone with access to this software or something similar to it

http://www.agnitio-corp.com/products...gnition-system

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amanda

For those interested, here are a couple of recent shows Fetzer did on SH.

---

I wonder if Fetzer's radio blog isn't being deliberately undermined by the admin? It's been a basket case of extended non updates, & broken MP3 links. It's not rocket science to find a free host for MP3 files. Only place I'm aware of to see JF's latest is:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO9...tK9IdIQ/videos
which leashes you to the puter to watch/listen to YT. :(

Dr. Tracy also posted last week:

August 7, 2015
PayPal Pulls Plug on Wolfgang Halbig ⁴⁹

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

I wonder if Fetzer's radio blog isn't being deliberately undermined by the admin? It's been a basket case of extended non updates, & broken MP3 links. It's not rocket science to find a free host for MP3 files. Only place I'm aware of to see JF's latest is:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO9...tK9IdIQ/videos
which leashes you to the puter to watch/listen to YT. :(

---

Yeah, not sure what's going on with Fetzer's radio site http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/, but if you have suggestions on what he needs to do to get the mp3s posted, just leave a comment over there or email him. I think he's just really into the video presentation and getting to show his slides, and he's kind of lost sight of the fact that lots of people just like to listen.

Also, best place to find the new shows (only his and not all of the MBC shows) is here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...otfX1ELkIBrXZ3

Haven't had a chance to listen to this one yet: http://gunsandbutter.org/blog/2015/0...mass-shootings

Sandy Hook And The Politics Behind Mass Shootings
Posted on August 12th, 2015
http://assets.snappages.com/websites...comment_sm.png0 http://assets.snappages.com/websites...r_share_sm.png 5

Guest: Dr. James F. Tracy
Update on analysis of Sandy Hook Elementary School “shooting” in Newtown, CT with compelling new evidence from independent researchers, including that of NA School Safety Consultant, Wolfgang Halbig. Many anomalies cited: authorities raze school and home of Adam Lanza’s mother; no date stamp on police dashcam video; evidence of a Live Shooter Drill taking place; large fast food orders arriving which can only happen during a Homeland Security and FEMA Capstone Exercise; same child killed at Sandy Hook who is two years later killed at school in Pakistan; agendas for gun control and childhood mental health protocols furthered.


Links and Resources:

• Memory Hole Blog website
• “Lone Wolf” Terror and the PsyWar on American Public Opinion
• PayPal Pulls Plug on Wolfgang Halbig
• Sandy Hook Justice

This is an older show w/Fetzer doing a slide presentation on SH--it's a good summary of all the evidence demonstrating this to be a hoax. Fetzer says that the official CT report on SH was written by St. Attorney Stephen Sedensky---anyone know if Sedensky is a jewish name?? Also, he mentioned how there were no fingerprints on the gun supposedly used to kill Nancy Lanza, and the shell casing had DNA that matched an ex-convict from another state. And at the school, apparently none of the bullet fragments could be matched with the guns supposedly used by Adam Lanza

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPt6UNUAZqM

I just noticed http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com is updated to episode 81 w/Ole Dammegard from 7/25 (almost 3 weeks ago!). MP3s are now hosted at podbean.

Thx Amanda for posting the 8/12 Guns & Butter w/J.Tracy; I wasn't aware of that show (meaning their latest; I've aware of G&B for years). I enjoy hearing JT on the interviewee side of the mic. His unflappably 'professorial' tone & language, emotionally detached, doesn't incite the 'fear' which an AJ or even JFetz often do with their apparent passion, or urgency wrt our imminent DOOM! :o But JT does pretty much have a blind spot for the kosher elephant in the room,, in accordance with western academic taboos!! A communications PhD whose niche is being a critic of mass media simply can't be naive about dajooz question, with their (boastfully) owning/controlling the mass joozmedia. But JT 'doesn't go there', at least that I've heard, and the guests he selects don't either. Nor does JT go there wrt his S.Hoax analysis, the principals of which are joo after joo after joo.

JT also posted this recent show; speaks of FF's in general terms, VG:

Quote:

---

August 12, 2015
Manufactured Terror in the Homeland ⁸

by James Tracy • Interviews • Tags: alternative media, Charleston shooting, false flag terror, Sandy Hook Elementary, social engineering, terrorism



https://checkinitoutdotcom.files.wor...gsen.jpg?w=474

This week’s Real Politik consists of a pre-recorded conversation with RT correspondent and commentator Patrick Henningsen with James Tracy that originally aired on the July 26 edition of Henningsen’s weekly radio broadcast, Sunday Wire.

Mr. Henningsen is also the founder of the exciting alternative news and analysis website 21st Century Wire.

More…

---

and speaking of djoo question, JFetz has a joo-wise guest, John DeNugent, as guest on his latest show,

The Real Deal Ep # 90 Mary Phagan and Leo Frank: Justice with Ironies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5ZqGeoIHS8

@PatColo- Yeah, I totally agree with you on JT. I greatly appreciate his calm and ration approach to things--he's definitely a good contrast to Fetzer, who tends to get a bit riled up. And on the jewish issue, JT does stay away from that, but I'm assuming that's for fear of losing his job (they already tried to get him fired from his university for speaking out on SH). I think he goes as far as he can, and I give him a lot of credit for calling out the false flags and the obvious hoaxes--I highly doubt you're going to find many other professors willing to speak out.

Speaking of JT, the gunsandbutter audio is also posted on his site now: http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/14...ass-shootings/

And there's also this: http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/14...acre-was-real/

August 14, 2015
$25K Reward Offered for “Irrefutable Proof” Sandy Hook Massacre Was REAL ¹²

by James Tracy • News, Videos • Tags: charity industry, public opinion, Sandy Hook Elementary
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...cash.jpg?w=474A man is offering $25,000 to any party who can substantively disprove his claim that the December 14, 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre was staged. YouTube personality “Joe Jones” thinks the tragic incident was carried out with the aid of “crisis actors” at a building “decommissioned several years prior to the day of the event” because of “asbestos and mold.” By late 2012 “the building was just being used for storage,” he says in the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RygOWYQEcXQ

Sandy Hook was fabricated by somebody who decided, “Oh, we’re going to do a school shooting, and all of the fake actors who play out the parts of all of these victims are going to become filthy rich from fools who are sending money to them–millions and millions of dollars.

Jones addresses defenders of the official Sandy Hook narrative, who he derisively refers to as “liberals,” encouraging them to come forward with solid evidence of the shooting’s authenticity and demonstrate the sincerity of their claim by matching his $25K offer. The combined funds would be held in an escrow account while a third party private investigator–paid for by Jones– verifies the submitted evidence. If the document(s) prove valid the individual will then receive the $50,000 account balance.
The extravagant assertion would mean that everyone from Newtown’s First Selectman and Connecticut State Police to the corporate news media and key figures in the Obama administration were involved in a colossal hoax to terrorize the American people into foregoing yet more of their freedoms to the state.
Connecticut Governor Dannell Malloy and the Obama administration have funneled tens of millions to Newtown since December 2012. They should therefore see fit engage Jones in his modest challenge, thereby replenishing precious taxpayer dollars that have freely flowed to Newtown over the past 32 months. In October 2013 the Sandy Hook Elementary School was demolished when Malloy quickly appropriated $50 million for a new school facility. In addition, Obama’s Department of Justice has provided several million in compensation to Connecticut and Newtown civic and law enforcement officials in their efforts to address the tragedy.

^ speaking of JTracy & dajooz; in his recent Perloff Flight 77 post, our own 'dachsielady' wrote a lengthy comment gently indicting dajooz in 911. Zio-Gatekeeping-Whip 'Marzi' replied demanding 'scholarly proof', and waving around his/her scary "anti-Shlomo-ism!!" :o flamethrower.

I replied the following to 'Marzi' more than 24 hours ago now, and guess where my reply still is now?? See bottom line... >:(

zeetip says: August 14, 2015 at 10:07 AM


“Kindly present a scholarly argument in an article with proof of your assertion…”


Kind of you to ask! It’s ironic; not only did Dr. Tracy just finish an interview with P. Henningsen, where JT observed the policing of US/Western dialog since at least the inception of the ADL in 1913; but Doctors KBarrett, JFetzer, NKollerstrom and other Uni Profs also attest to the “invisible/de-facto limits to free speech/thought/publication” in academia.


Anyways these links will have to do, hope they meet your exacting “…scholarly argument in an article” standard.


http://www.911missinglinks.com


https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2013/09/16/resurrecting-israel-did-911-all-the-proof-in-the-world


free book by Chris Bollyn, “Solving 9/11: The Deception That Changed The World”,
http://bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book


search ‘alan sabrosky israel 9/11’ (no quotes), he’s Jewish BTW :)


Your comment is awaiting moderation.

you can check the status of my terminally 'awaiting moderation' reply at its assigned url, http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/13...#comment-94396

^ gsus' little bug problem prohibits me from editing the above reply.

It's been more like 16 hours ago (Fri 8/14 10:07 AM Eastern) now that I submitted that reply.

"Odd", coz I also submitted [zeetip says: August 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM] 15 minutes LATER, and that reply was quickly posted uncensored; meanwhile my 10:07 reply rots away in the approval queue. Maybe JT (or more likely his zio-gatekeeping comment censorer...) will approve it after a few more days, when that comment thread is 'safely' seeing no more eyeballs. :( Meanwhile, Hasbara Agent Marzi's comment/"challenge" will sit there pretty-like, apparently unanswered.... :(

@PatColo- Somewhere in the comments over there at Tracy's site, I read that if you put more than one link in, you end up trapped in moderation. So, I think the strategy is to break up your responses so they only have one link at a time. Another commenter put in an extra link over the limit, but added some extra letters like this xxxhttp://grizzom.blogspot.com/ (and just tell people to get rid of the xxx)

Here's the latest from that guy offering $25K for irrefutable proof SH was real:

http://scoopfeed.net/2015/08/15/joe-...age-and-offer/

Joe Jones: RAW STORY “Irresponsible,” Distorts Message and Offer

August 15, 2015 James Tracy Headlines, Videomedia disinformation, Sandy Hook School Shooting
YouTuber contends popular website’s article misquotes from video

“The website RAWSTORY.COM misquoted me in their article about my video offering a reward. I have been threatened by all manner of Internet TROLLS who are working off of the ASSUMPTION that *I* demanded that Sandy hook parents show up at MY DOOR. That is an absolute LIE.”-Joe Jones

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD6ei_k4EiI

Here's the Raw Story article: http://www.rawstory.com/2015/08/watc...-liberal-scam/ (look at all the brainwashed commenters--I'd bet they'd love SPINgola's show!)

Don't bother posting any comments over there that expose Sandy Hook as a blatant hoax b/c they simply delete all of your comments

@PatColo- Looks like I was wrong about the keep your comments at JT's to one link--I just posted a comment there with one link and it's in moderation. Not sure what's going on over there. Sometimes my comments appear right away, and other times, they just get stuck in moderation.

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/16...ce/#more-18929

August 16, 2015
Joe Jones Responds to Raw Story Hit Piece ⁸

by James Tracy • Home • Tags: journalism, news media analysis, propaganda, Sandy Hook Elementary
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...tory.jpg?w=474Misleading article is emblematic of website’s politically-motivated “journalism”

Kentucky man receiving threats from Sandy Hook gov’t narrative defenders

On August 14 progressive-left website Raw Story posted an article, “WATCH: Sandy Hook Truther Offers $25,000 Reward for ‘Irrefutable’ Proof Shooting Wasn’t a Liberal Scam,” drawing attention to Kentucky resident Joe Jones’ $25,000 YouTube challenge questioning whether the December 14, 2012 Newtown massacre took place as it had been widely reported in major news media.
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...pg?w=300&h=161Raw Story’s frame capture of Jones in a Mussolini-like pose enhances the leftish caricature of a “Sandy Hook skeptic” and “open carry advocate”


Is Jones’ request unreasonable? Raw Story thinks so. And the popular liberal forum proceeded to frame Jones’ assertions in ways that have prompted many of its readers to directly contact and chastise the Kentucky resident for remarks he never made or intended.


First let us consider Raw Story‘s title:

WATCH: Sandy Hook truther offers $25,000 reward for ‘irrefutable’ proof shooting wasn’t a ‘liberal’ scam

This is a clear distortion pitched right over the plate of Raw Story ideologically-motivated readers. In fact, Jones has asked for “irrefutable proof that Sandy Hook was REAL,” as the original title of his August 5, 2015 YouTube video reads.


Nevertheless, the article, written by Raw Story associate editor Tom Boggioni, goes on to incorrectly suggest that Jones is a pistol-wielding crazy who is specifically demanding that “liberals” or even the parents of Sandy Hook School children to visit his residence and provide such “irrefutable proof.” As Boggioni reports,

According to Jones — if his child was killed — “irrefutable proof” would entail parents of a dead Sandy Hook child showing up his door [sic] with the child’s “birth certificate, his death certificate, his medical records, his school, records, the family photo albums, photos, videos, I would bring his clothes, I would bring his toys, I would bring everything to that person’s house and say, ‘here is the proof that my son lived and my son died.’”

Parents of children who died at Sandy Hook can find Jones in Franklin, Kentucky, but should be forewarned that he is an open carry advocate. (emphasis retained)

https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...ega1.jpg?w=474Raw Story Executive Editor Tony Ortega has taken the Church of Scientology to task for “smearing” public figures. Raw Story routinely vilifies individuals such as Jones that don’t share its political views or take issue with the Obama administration as “conspiracy theorists” and “truthers.” [Image Credit: Ad Week]



In Jones’ video response he calls Raw Story‘s actions “irresponsible.” Yet the website’s personnel have never cloaked their political allegiances and affiliations. While many Raw Story readers fancy themselves sophisticated, they oddly embrace the government-sanctioned narrative of Newtown are are thus quick to condemn Jones’ modest proposal out of hand.
If truth be told, Raw Story is run by a pack of semi-journalistic political operatives (e.g. here and here) driven as much by their political ideology as anyone over at FoxNews or The Weekly Standard. Ironically one of Raw Story‘s executive editors, former Village Voice director Tony Ortega with a long career at “alternative” weeklies, has taken the Church of Scientology to task for “smearing” opponents in the press. Yet as its August 14 story on Sandy Hook “truther” Jones suggests, Raw Story has an equal penchant for smearing anyone questioning curious public events or taking issue with Obama administration policies by labeling them “truthers” and “conspiracy theorists” (e.g. here, here, here and here.)


Raw Story‘s misleading attack and its past editorial behavior indicates that there is indeed some substance to Jones’ challenge. What if the presidential administration the site typically shills for is involved in a colossal hoax? A genuine criminal investigation begun in early 2013 would have likely led to the Obama White House and Justice Department long ago.


In January 2013 corporate media outlets similarly attacked and mischaracterized this author for raising simple questions and suggesting that major media failed to nail down exactly what took place at Sandy Hook Elementary. CNN’s Anderson Cooper, who vigorously attacked Memory Hole Blog at the time, won’t answer the author’s invitation to further interrogate the many unanswered questions that still remain and have since emerged. And to date Newtown and Connecticut state officials have failed to adequately address the numerous public records requests filed by school safety expert Wolfgang Halbig since February 2013.


Raw Story couldn’t be further from the journalistic ideal of rooting out corruption and bringing culprits to the court of public opinion. The publication seeks to cheerlead and run cover for its political left partners in crime by taking advantage of its readers own shallow misperceptions and political prejudices.

This is "scoopfeed" site is Prof Tracy's memoryholeblog's newswire.

http://scoopfeed.net/2015/08/16/sand...foia-hearings/

SANDY HOOK – HERE IS WHAT PERJURY LOOKS LIKE IN THE CT FOIA HEARINGS

August 16, 2015 James Tracy VideoSandy Hook School Shooting
Monte E Frank, who has a vested interest in Sandy Hook donations and their foundations, perjures himself from testimony of the previous two related FOIA hearings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuWDoO3ogDE

Looks like this (jewish?) doctor from the Sandy Hook show can't keep his story straight.



In the video, this ER doctor from Danbury Hospital claims he treated 2 of the children from the Sandy Hook fake shooting (he also said, parents of kids taken to the hospital remained at the school and were told the news there--yeah, right, parents would just stay at the school instead of racing to the hospital where their kid supposedly was)



https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=49&v=cvoI4EjjSGI



Yet in this article http://jewishhomela.com/2013/11/01/s...sualty-events/ , he claims everyone died at the scene:

Quote:

---

Dr. William Begg, of Danbury Hospital in Connecticut, began his remarks by explaining that he didn’t enjoy leaving home. “I rarely travel. But I was so inspired by Dr. Applebaum that I felt compelled to come.” He discussed the tragic shooting in Sandy Hook Elementary School, and stressed prevention as part of disaster preparedness. Treatment, no matter how ready and fast, can come too late. In Newtown, “No one made it to the emergency room. They all died at the scene.”

---

Okay, I'm not buying this at all (I just think it's cover to try to make it look like the school was operational), but I'll post it anyway. After going through the video and photographic evidence inside and outside the school, I still believe that school had been out of operation for years.

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/17...assacre-event/

August 17, 2015
Hochsprung Email Suggests Sandy Hook Vacated Months Before Massacre Event ³³

by James Tracy • Documents, Videos • Tags: Sandy Hook Elementary

https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...big1.jpg?w=474Wolfgang Halbig discusses this document and other developments when Real Politik welcomes him back on the Monday, August 17 edition which airs at 3PM EST on Truth Frequency Radio and is archived post-airing here.


On June 2, 2015 Newtown counsel Monte Frank Fed Ex’d Wolfgang Halbig some 200 emails dated 2012 pertinent to Halbig’s FOI requests and one day before the second scheduled hearing before Connecticut’s FOI Commission.


Most were “junk emails,” according to Halbig. Yet one email dated July 19, 2012, between Sandy Hook Elementary principal Dawn Hochsprung and chief custodian Kevin Anzellotti indicates that teachers will be asked to pack up and move, yet they will “still have their jobs” but “mums the word.”

On the morning of July 19 Hochsprung emails Anzollotti:

How does this look? [Apparently referring to an attached pdf excluded from the document disclosure.] NOT set in stone! I have to notify teachers after we meet next Thursday, then we can get moving. Of course, they will need to come in and pack… This is going to be really hard!

That afternoon Anzollotti responds:

I got it and it is what it is it’sbad [sic] for us but I would not what to [sic] be in your shoes as your telling them but all still have jobs I guess that’s a good thing mums the word [sic]

Such communication may help to explain both the internal and external condition of the school and its decrepit condition.


https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...ng?w=300&h=271


In other developments Newtown’s Police Chief and Monte Frank, the bicyclist/gun control advocate and attorney for Newtown leaders, may have perjured himself by confirming before the FOI Commission the authenticity of a Newtown police dash cam video document purportedly taken on 12/14/12 that curiously lacks the customary date and geo-location stamp necessary for its forensic and judicial utility.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuWDoO3ogDE

Also, for those interested, it's sometime worth going through the comments at Prof Tracy's site--some of the people over there dig up some interesting stuff.

Here's a comment I found in response to this post:

Quote:

---

Maryaha says:
August 19, 2015 at 12:26 PM
Has anyone else checked out the SHES web address that is shown in these two e-mails on the Wayback Machine? I did, and if I am reading it correctly, the first time that web page was crawled by the Wayback Machine, was on April 6, 2012. From 1996 to that date, the page had never been crawled, and it was not crawled even once for the rest of 2012. It begins to be on January 11, 2013 and continues to be crawled regularly, the last recorded one on July 8, 2015. There are 56 crawls for the page altogether. So where was that webpage before 2012? Was it created to add legitimacy for the event, taken down until a short time before December 14, 2012, and then put back up in January 2013?

---

Also, on a previous post, someone other there mentioned that this Monte attorney guy got a recent promotion (maybe now head of CT Bar Association--or something like that), and maybe someone who was involved w/the fake funerals (perhaps an embalmer or something) also got a promotion. So, I guess if you do well in helping to pull off these hoaxes, you can get some career advancement out of it.

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/20...ords-requests/

August 20, 2015

Newtown Officials, CT FOI Commission Spurn Records Requests ^Reply

by James Tracy • Interviews • Tags: censorship, charity industry, Sandy Hook Elementary

As another school year is upon us Real Politik welcomes back former Florida State Trooper and school safety expert Wolfgang Halbig for an update on his outstanding Freedom of Information Act requests with the Newtown Connecticut Police Department, Public Schools, and First Selectman.


https://checkinitoutdotcom.files.wor...lbig.jpg?w=474

Halibig has been a tireless critic of the government-mandated version of the Sandy Hook massacre, raising necessary funds for legal representation and traveling to Newtown numerous times over the past year to demand that area officials present the necessary records that the shooting took place as it was presented by corporate news media.


Halbig filed his first FOI request with officials immediately involved in the Sandy Hook massacre back in February 2013 and they have yet to be satisfactorily addressed. Nevertheless, the Connecticut FOI Commission has seen fit to formally conclude that Mr. Halbig’s requests have been settled. Halibig’s next step is to appeal the unfulfilled FOI requests to Connecticut Superior Court.


In other developments Monte Frank, the bicycle-cruising gun control advocate and attorney for Newtown leaders, appears to have perjured himself by confirming before the FOI Commission the authenticity of a Newtown police dash cam video document purportedly taken on 12/14/12 that curiously lacks the customary date and geo-location stamp necessary for its forensic utility.


Most recently PayPal pulled the plug on Halbig’s fundraising account, apparently under pressure from Sandy Hook victims’ organizations. A similar effort was successfully waged against Halbig’s GoFundMe account in October 2014.


Wolfgang Halbig’s website is sandyhookjustice.com.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agyv5mVsIkw

Amanda, as always, you post good stuff. Thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amanda

Also, for those interested, it's sometime worth going through the comments at Prof Tracy's site--some of the people over there dig up some interesting stuff.

Here's a comment I found in response to this post:

Quote:

---

Maryaha says:
August 19, 2015 at 12:26 PM
Has anyone else checked out the SHES web address that is shown in these two e-mails on the Wayback Machine? I did, and if I am reading it correctly, the first time that web page was crawled by the Wayback Machine, was on April 6, 2012. From 1996 to that date, the page had never been crawled, and it was not crawled even once for the rest of 2012. It begins to be on January 11, 2013 and continues to be crawled regularly, the last recorded one on July 8, 2015. There are 56 crawls for the page altogether. So where was that webpage before 2012? Was it created to add legitimacy for the event, taken down until a short time before December 14, 2012, and then put back up in January 2013?

---

Also, on a previous post, someone other there mentioned that this Monte attorney guy got a recent promotion (maybe now head of CT Bar Association--or something like that), and maybe someone who was involved w/the fake funerals (perhaps an embalmer or something) also got a promotion. So, I guess if you do well in helping to pull off these hoaxes, you can get some career advancement out of it.

---

Interesting. I wonder how the wayback machine works. Does it crawl web sites like spiders do? If so it is possible that the site was configured to be not crawl-able. It is possible to set a web site so that it is not crawl-able by things like search engine sites. They use what is euphemistically called spiders or web crawlers to index web sites into their search engines.

1hr interview here, 27:40 through the end JTracy is hit with djooz questions from callers & messagers. JT basically takes the AJ 'diffuse the heat' tact; it's CFR & trilaterals, izzy is a tool of the "Anglo-American Empire" lol, try more like vice versa, JT!

"Oddly," there's no MHB entry pointing to this one! :|~

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

The People Speak with Steve Johnson 2015.08.18


Guest: James Tracy



BBS Radio

64k CF Download

^ can't edit my above reply, but I did just post this to MHB's Free Form Friday comments, and it posted immediately; click date link to check for replies:

zeetip says:

August 23, 2015 at 11:39 AM

Surprised MHB hasn’t pointed to this recent 1 hour JFT inverview,
The People Speak with Steve Johnson 2015.08.18
Guest: James Tracy
grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-people-speak-with-steve-johnson.html

2nd half is good; many questions re zionism.

http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015...-lanza-estate/

Sandy Hook families each gets $94k to settle lawsuits against Lanza estate

Posted on August 21, 2015 by Dr. Eowyn | 23 Comments
Americans are notorious for our litigiousness. One of the many curiosities of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings of December 14, 2012, is that, unlike other school shootings, the families of the alleged victims of alleged killer Adam Lanza had not filed lawsuits. (See my post of March 29, 2014, “Why are there no Sandy Hook lawsuits?”)
Two long years after the alleged massacre, however, some of them finally sued, although each victim family had already received MILLIONS of dollars in donations from individual Facebook sites, organized Sandy Hook charities like United Way, and the $11.6 million Sandy Hook School Support Fund. Some of those Facebook and charity sites, curiously, had been created before the alleged massacre, that is, before the alleged victims actually became victims. See:

• Sandy Hook victims’ funds reap millions of dollars in donation
• Sandy Hook RIP/donation webpages created BEFORE the massacre
• Another Sandy Hook fundraiser that pre-dates the massacre

Three groups of defendants are the targets of lawsuits:

1. The manufacturer, distributor and seller of the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle allegedly wielded by Lanza.
2. The town of Newtown and its board of education.
3. The estate of Nancy Lanza — Adam’s mother whom he allegedly had killed before he allegedly drove to the school — for carelessly allowing her son access to the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle that he allegedly used in the alleged massacre.

For more on the above lawsuits, please see my post “Sandy Hook families sue Lanza estate, as Newtown demolishes the Lanza home”.
Andrew Gorosko reports for The Newtown Bee, August 3, 2015, that the 16 plaintiffs in lawsuits that were filed earlier this year against the estate of Nancy Lanza would receive nearly $94,000 each in a proposed settlement of those legal claims., according to a July 31 letter by Angelo A. Ziotas to Probate Judge Joseph A. Egan, Jr.
Ziotas is the attorney representing one of the litigants, the estate of child victim James Mattioli.
The other plaintiffs are:

• The estates (i.e., families) of child victims Emilie Parker, Grace McDonnell, Jack Pinto, Charlotte Bacon, Jessica Rekos, Daniel Barden, Dylan Hockley, Jesse Lewis, and Benjamin Wheeler.
• The estates of adult teachers Rachel D’Avino, Lauren Rousseau, Mary Sherlach, and Victoria Soto.
• Teachers Natalie Hammond and Deborah Pisani whom Lanza had wounded, not killed.

According to Ziotas, the 16 plaintiffs each would receive equal portions of the $1.5 million value of a home insurance policy that Nancy Lanza had on her house at 36 Yogananda Street. When that amount is divided by 16, each of the plaintiffs would receive $93,750 from the insurance firm.

https://fellowshipofminds.files.word...pg?w=500&h=410The Lanza home at 36 Yogananda St., now demolished

According to the lawsuit filed by the majority of the plaintiffs, Nancy Lanza, at some point before the shooting incident, bought a Bushmaster AR-15-style semiautomatic rifle. The suit states: “The weapon was an assault rifle designed for military use in modern warfare. The Bushmaster was built to spray rapid fire and pierce body armor in order to inflict maximum casualties on the battlefield, but was sold to the general public by its manufacturer and various other business entities, even though it had no practical civilian purpose for self-defense or reasonable sporting activities.”The lawsuit claims that Nancy Lanza carelessly and with negligence kept the gun stored unsecured in her home where Adam Lanza had access to it, which was a “substantial factor” in the deaths and injuries of the plaintiffs. The lawsuit filed on behalf of the Mattioli estate states that Nancy allowed her son access to the weapon although she knew or should have known that “his mental and emotional condition made him a danger to others.”The defendant named in the lawsuits is Samuel Starks, the administrator of Nancy Lanza’s estate, who estimated the family home at 36 Yogananda St., to be worth about $64,000. But the house, in an affluent section of Newtown, was assessed at $523,000 at one point, according to The Hartford Courant .

Vision Government Solutions had the ownership history for 36 Yogananda as:

• Sold to Estate of Nancy J. Lanza on 2/1/2013 for $0
• Sold to Nancy Lanza on 2/8/2011 for $0

Note: When a house changes hands from one family member to another, as in a divorce, the sale of the property is usually listed as $0. See also “The strange purchase date and price of Sandy Hook homes.”
The last time I checked, the ownership of the house had reverted to Ryan Lanza, Adam’s older brother. But The Courant says that “The house was donated to the town [Newtown] by a New Jersey bank that took over the mortgage that Nancy Lanza had on the property.”
In January, the city of Newtown voted to demolish the Lanza home, just as the city had also demolished Sandy Hook Elementary School (SHES), allegedly for asbestos contamination (see “Was Sandy Hook Elementary School already abandoned before the massacre“).
https://fellowshipofminds.files.word...tion.jpg?w=500
The construction workers of Consigli Construction who tore down the school were all sworn to secrecy by signing confidentiality agreements forbidding public discussion of the site, photographs or disclosure of any information about the building. Why the secrecy?
Note: The Italian word consigli means “advice or counsel,” as in consigliere to a mafia don or crime boss.
The family-owned Consigli Construction Construction is also building a new replacement SHES, with a generous grant of $50 million from the State of Connecticut, i.e., Connecticut taxpayers.
According to The Newtown Bee, in 2002, engineering consultants had recommended to the Sandy Hook school district that SHES be merely renovated with upgrades to the school’s ventilation systems to meet indoor air quality codes, at a cost of $5 million. The work was supposed to have begun in 2010, over a 9-month period, which meant Sandy Hook Elementary School likely was already abandoned before the massacre.
So the same construction company has the lucrative contract to both tear down the asbestos-contaminated old school and rebuild a $50 million new one. Pretty neat deal.
In October 2014, Consigli broke ground for the new $50 million 87,000 sq.-ft. state-of-the-art school to replace the old 70,000 sq. ft. building. The new building “will include three classroom wings, two of which are two-stories that overlook central courtyards. Breakout spaces in the form of treehouses will be built to create an alternate learning environment. The new school will incorporate the most current and advanced educational approaches, security and design.”
https://fellowshipofminds.files.word...pg?w=500&h=306
https://fellowshipofminds.files.word...pg?w=500&h=285
For all the posts FOTM has published on Sandy Hook, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.
~Éowyn

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Glass

Interesting. I wonder how the wayback machine works. Does it crawl web sites like spiders do? If so it is possible that the site was configured to be not crawl-able. It is possible to set a web site so that it is not crawl-able by things like search engine sites. They use what is euphemistically called spiders or web crawlers to index web sites into their search engines.

---

don't
It is simple to code a site to not be crawled. I know what affect it would have with the wayback machine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i86Dhb5HCCI

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/08/26...omas-j-obrien/ (this guy Reich got into a whole mess just for questioning Sandy Hook and calling Carver)

August 26, 2015
Jonathan Reich Files Court Corruption Complaint Against CT Assistant State’s Attorney Thomas J. O’Brien ¹⁵

by James Tracy • Documents • Tags: Sandy Hook Elementary
Man charged in 2012 for telephoning Connecticut coroner H. Wayne Carver claims unlawful treatment

“I was singled out because I am located out of state and a researcher of public corruption.”

Paid $37,000 in attorney fees and prevented from creating legal defense fund

Court Date postponed 12 times!

From HartfordCommunityCourt.comhttps://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...ich1.jpg?w=474

The following letter was obtained from several national newspapers currently investigating this story:

To all parties receiving this letter,


This is being sent to you in regards to a follow-up of compliance within the Judicial System of the State of Connecticut, and to be sure that the right eyes are seeing and responding to this letter. There has been an issue of respondence of multiple parties in the past of which FOIA requests and E-mails have not been answered promptly and/or adequately. This letter is to reinforce the structure and chain of command to which the people have a right to speak and be heard.


This letter is addressed to:


August 24, 2015

Gail P. Hardy, State’s Attorney

101 Lafayette Street

Hartford, CT 06106

(860) 566-3190


Dear Ms. Hardy


For the following reasons, I am writing to you regarding the unethical and illegal practices of one of your employees, Senior Assistant State’s Attorney Thomas J. O’Brien. I am seeking an immediate dismissal of my case, and reparations for the time frame of July 2014 – August 2015, during which Mr. O’Brien illegally directed my attorney to remove my legal defense fund. This took place during the court proceedings of Judge Raymond R. Norko at the Hartford Community Court.


Mr. O’Brien has recently indicated to my attorney that he is considering prosecuting charges against me for several Connecticut FOIA requests, which were sent requesting public record information.


Mr. O’Brien also denies ordering the legal defense fund’s removal, despite notations of that fact in O’Brien’s own handwriting on court documents. A Federal Civil Rights complaint has already been filed with the U.S. Department of Justice. Mr. O’Brien engaged in cruel and unusual punishment that caused daily suffering based on illegal orders and violations of defendant’s civil rights at the Hartford Community Court.


A letter from my former attorney indicates that there was an agreement “to take down your Newtown website, which included defense fund information”. There are many other violations of court procedures and the Connecticut Practice Book.


Most Hartford Community Court cases are handled within 3 months, and with few court dates, the defendant speaks to the State’s Attorney and one to two days of community service are mandated, after community service is completed the defendant’s case is dismissed 30 days later.


I am requesting an investigation into these complaints against Thomas J. O’Brien, Assistant State’s Attorney, for obstruction of justice, judicial misconduct and conspiracy; witness intimidation and witness tampering; also, unlawful prohibition and violation of U.S. Federal Civil Rights that I should not be permitted to do any legal fundraising.


From March until May 2013 excessive phone calls from the Avon CT Police Dept. are placed to my home phone, mobile phone, and family members mobile phones. NYPD personnel are dispatched to my home on several occasions, on behalf of the Avon CT Police Dept. I was repeatedly called over 100 times and finally I was told that I was being arrested and had a $250,000 bail unless I drove to CT and would receive a $50,000 reduced bail. I am requesting a full investigation of the corruption in the Hartford Community Court and conspiracy between the Avon CT Police and NYPD.


On 5/17/13, Pullman & Comley, LLC was retained to provide legal representation for an alleged Class C misdemeanor charge that was assigned to Hartford Community Court. A Pullman & Comley employee, Sheathelm, spoke with a Detective in the Avon CT Police Department to schedule a police intake for surrender/arrest. The same day, Alan J. Sobol of Pullman & Comley, spoke with Detective Sergeant Jeffrey Gilbert to discuss extradition. Due to intimidation, I complied. Due to the fact, that I agreed to voluntarily travel from NY to CT, another licensed attorney in CT told me that no bail should have been required.

On 5/20/13, Pullman & Comley failed to instruct an attorney to appear at an authorized appointment for Arrest/Surrender, scheduled by Pullman & Comley, for 5/20/15 at the Avon Police Department. Sergeant Jeffrey Gilbert & Detective Jason Reid of the Avon CT Police Department, who had previously arranged the appointment, were able to intimidate and further threaten the defendant without legal counsel present.


Both Sergeant Jeffrey Gilbert and Detective Jason Reid of Avon CT Police Department threatened to jail me for several days at the intake due to Alan J. Sobol’s failure to appear and the absence of any lawyer from the retained law firm of Pullman & Comley, who had scheduled the appointment. Reid and Gilbert had previously called my home phone, harassing my family members with over 100 calls. Someone in the Avon CT Police Department was able to obtain phone records without a warrant or ex-parte served prior, in violation of Avon CT Police, as well as Metro PCS corporate policy. The Avon CT detectives dispatched NYPD officers to my home in violation of procedure as a means of intimidation, they had inquired and stated that I was not in any trouble and had not done anything wrong. The Avon CT Detective Jason Reid did not even serve a warrant upon the defendant at intake, as required by Connecticut Practice Book, Sec. 36-5. Also, when the Connecticut State Police examined the one of the same items from the police report in March 2013, they had determined that no violation occurred.


The maximum financial penalty for a conviction of the alleged charge is $500. I was informed that many people who are alleged to have committed minor infractions (misdemeanors) has to complete several days of community service. I was singled out because I am located out of state and a researcher of public corruption. Even after submitting paperwork that several days of community service had been performed, the case was still not dismissed.


Previously, on 3/10/13, the Connecticut State Police (TFC Michael Downes) filed in their report that they had investigated the elements of this case and found that “no violation occurred.” All of the calls would have been investigated by March 10th as they were obtained from the phone company in February.


Pullman & Comley failed to conduct a Conflict of Interest Check. This conflict of interest check is critical as the legal firm Pullman & Comley also represented at least one of the fundraiser charities related to Sandy Hook, an organizer of one of the Sandy Hook charities was listed as an alternate victim in this case.


I later discovered that the complainant in Avon CT who had filed a police report against me in February 2013 is now under investigation by authorities, including by the District Attorney’s office in southern New York State. The complainant lied under oath in the murder trial involving a young woman who was a home health care worker and whose remains were found in December 2009 near Foxwoods Casino. The complainant has been publicly posting his social security number, home address and family members’ addresses, which have been viewed by thousands of people (despite having told Avon CT Police that he was “in fear for his life”).


It is still unclear whether the reported complainant, Harold Wayne Carver, ever filed an official written complaint form, since the written complaint is in multiple handwritings.


The Avon Police Report is missing several supplemental reports such as the Connecticut State Police Report (Case # 201300000766), including a written complaint from the “Family in Durham, CT”. This family is responsible for illegally repurposing photos of a minor in order to solicit donations from the public. Photos of a minor stolen from a private Flickr account (family photography account), with information disseminated throughout mainstream and social media, starting December 2012, were repurposed and used to collect millions of dollars in donations. The girl’s real identity is Lily Gaubert, however TransAct Technologies of Hamden, CT willfully disseminated the photo and claimed that her legal name was Allison Wyatt. The biological mother of the minor victim had posted on many social media sites that her daughter’s image was stolen from her account and illegally repurposed for use in a fraudulent non-profit scheme based in CT. Due to the theft and subsequent inter-state illegal transmission of a minor’s photograph (private intellectual property), this may qualify for a federal prosecution and financial reparations to the victim and her family in Louisiana.


Lastly, which employee or contingent worker of the Hartford Court System provided information from my file, before arraignment, to Jessica Sawyer of Patch.com (owned by DMEP Corp. d/b/a Hale Global), as well as to Fox CT (owned by News Corp.)?


As a result of the unlawful, patently false, and malicious statements of the press, I was the victim of several horrific attacks against me, including Religious Persecution, Defamation, Libel, and Threats. At the time of my arrest, I was innocent until proven guilty. The reports illegally given to the press, before they were publicly available or even placed into the clerk’s file, and subsequent refusal to provide the defendant with those very same reports, for over 2 years, constitute illegal activity on the part of the Hartford Community Court.


If you are a part of this E-mail/letter, I expect a response within 5 business days of receipt of this letter as to your involvement and/or explanation.

This letter has been sent to the following recipients via E-mail & Certified Mail:

State’s Attorney Gail P. Hardy – gail.hardy@ct.gov

Carl Ajello – carl.ajello@ct.gov

Lori Gayle – lori.gayle@jud.ct.gov

Governor Dannel P. Malloy – Governor.Malloy@ct.gov

Lt. Governor Nancy Wyman – LtGovernor.Wyman@ct.gov

Attorney General George Jepsen – attorney.general@ct.gov

Jessica Sawyer – jessie.l.sawyer@gmail.com


Sincerely,

Jonathan Reich

1. The Hartford Community Court according to guidelines is required to arraign defendants within 48 hours however Reich was arraigned 15 days later in violation of court procedures.
2. Several conversations between the State’s Attorney and Defense Counsel were not with the defendant present as required by guidelines.
3. Refusal to provide photocopies of Law Enforcement Reports, Affidavits and Statements in the possession of Pullman & Comley and the State’s Attorney (Police Report, and Written Complaint Form). The Connecticut Judicial Branch Practice Book states that a prosecutor should provide photocopies of Law Enforcement Reports, Affidavits and Statements within forty-five days. Sec. 40-13A. of the Connecticut Rules of Practice.
4. Court Dates were postponed 12 times (between the dates of 6/5/13, 7/13/13, 9/18/13, 11/21/13, 1/29/14, 3/26/14, 5/20/14, 6/10/14, 7/22/14, 9/30/14, 11/4/14) with the excuse that the Judge was absent due to “sick days”, however there was at the time, documented foreknowledge of these absences.
5. Obvious tampering with the content of the docket information, adding characters in non-cursive handwriting to change the narrative.
6. The Arrest Warrant Affidavit is incomplete given that neither box of type of Affidavit is selected. This item is obligatory for a valid police report.
7. Over 100 incoming phone calls to my family’s home phone, cell phones, and work phones to accomplish extradition from the State of NY to CT, bypassing any NY Judge’s jurisdiction.
8. To date, approximately 15 trips to Hartford CT have been sustained costing lost work time of my family. Approx. 3390 miles has been traveled to these illegal and inappropriate court proceedings. Over a period of 18 months I have to travel to Stamford every 2 weeks affecting my ability obtain a daily work schedule. Over the past 6 months, 1056 miles have been traveled to Probation meetings.
9. To date, approximately $37,000 in legal defense costs has accumulated through the law firm of Pullman & Comley, it was later found out that there was a conflict of interest due to financial distributions of funds to certain complainants in this case, such as the “Family from Durham, CT”, Pullman & Comley’s fund the My Sandy Hook Family Fund has made distributions to the same individuals that have filed a complaint in this case.
10. Pullman & Comley, LLC was retained on 5/17/13, to provide legal defense for an alleged Class C misdemeanor charge that was assigned to Hartford Community Court. Arrest Date– 5/20/13: Pullman & Comley, LLC failed to instruct an attorney to appear at an authorized appointment for Arrest/Surrender, scheduled by on Pullman & Comley, LLC, on 5/20/15 at the Avon Police Department. Sergeant Jeffrey Gilbert & Detective Jason Reid of the Avon Police Department, who had previously arranged the appointment, were able to intimidate and further threaten the defendant without legal counsel present.
11. Illegal leak of the police report to the Press, for means of Libel & Religious Persecution, before defendant’s arraignment, at a time when this report was not considered available to the public. This report was never provided to the defendant, only the press.
12. Thomas J. O’Brien and Pullman & Comley withheld the Police Report from the defendant for over 2 years.
13. A copy of the Arrest Warrant Affidavit was not served to the defendant as required by Connecticut Practice Book, Sec. 36-5.
14. Refusal of Pullman & Comley to turn over any documents to my new attorney, that were provided by the Assistant State’s Attorney to Pullman & Comley, in violation of Rule 1.16 of the Connecticut Rules of Practice.
15. Illegal violation of a defendant’s civil rights to operate a Legal Defense Fund by the Assistant State’s Attorney. Denial of use of Crowd-funding platforms or social media to raise awareness about the case or to raise legal funds.
16. A member of the bail commissioner’s office never conducted the required defendant screening for arraignment
17. No assistance offered by Pullman & Comley from misconduct within the Hartford Community Court which doesn’t even have an adult probation program, upon discussion with a probation officer who has been working there for many years who said that no one was ever sent to her office at the Superior Court from the Community Court.Rules of the Connecticut Practice Book violated by Thomas O’Brien:

Rule 3.4. Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel
A lawyer shall not: (1) Unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy or conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not counsel or assist another person to do any such act; (2) Falsify evidence, counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely, or offer an inducement to a witness that is prohibited by law;
Connecticut Practice Book, Rule 3.8. Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor
The prosecutor in a criminal case shall: (1) Refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause; (2) Make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to, and the procedure for obtaining, counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel; (3) Not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of important pretrial rights, such as the right to a preliminary hearing;
Connecticut Practice Book, Sec. 37-12. Defendant in Custody; Determination of Probable Cause
(d) Unless the judicial authority entered an order limiting disclosure of the affidavits submitted to the judicial authority in support of a finding of probable cause, whether or not probable cause has been found, all such affidavits, including any police reports, shall be made part of the court file and be open to public inspection and copying, and the clerk shall provide copies to any person upon receipt of any applicable fee.
Connecticut Practice Book, Sec. 36-7. Summons; Form of Summons and Complaint
A summons and complaint issued by a prosecuting authority or law enforcement officer shall: (1) Be in writing; (2) Be signed by the person issuing it with the title of such person’s office; (3) State the date of issuance and the municipality where issued; (4) Specify the name of the accused person; (5) Designate a time for appearance not more than fourteen days after issuance; (6) State the offense charged against the accused person; (7) State that if the accused does not appear at a specified time and place, an application may be made for the issuance of a warrant for arrest; (8) Inform the accused that he or she is entitled to be represented by an attorney; (9) Inform any accused charged with an offense punishable by incarceration who is unable to afford an attorney that he or she may be entitled to the services of a public defender.
Connecticut Practice Book, Sec. 36-5. Execution and Return of Warrant
The officer executing an arrest warrant may do so anywhere within the state upon apprehension
of the accused. The officer shall take the accused into custody, serve a copy of the warrant upon him or her and follow the procedure specified in Sections 38-1 or 38-2, whichever is applicable.



Here's a comment from memoryholeblog:

Quote:

---

Alek says:
August 27, 2015 at 12:51 PM
I hate the comments that detract from the subject. His situation cannot be compared to others who were breaking some stupid or unfair laws. This is something much worse. We are not allowed to question events? I listened to the tape of him calling the coroner’s office and he did nothing wrong and broke no laws. We have a right to question things!

---

Here's the latest from Fetzer on SH. He has that Allan Powell guy from Australia on again to go over more evidence photos. I only partially listened, but at some point they went over the clothes that the fake/non-existent Adam Lanza wore to the fake/never-happened SH shooting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GRAdmQQBIk

J.Tracy's newest podcast; for some reason I notice he conducts these on Tuesdays, but then doesn't post them to MHB until Thursdays! But they're first posted at http://checkinitout.com/ after they're recorded. This is the Aussi who JFetzer has interviewed a couple times already.


Interview 63: Allan Powell

https://checkinitoutdotcom.files.wor...walk.jpg?w=620

On this episode Australia-based independent researcher Allan Powell joins the program to discuss his deep research on the 2012 Sandy Hook massacre. Mr. Powell lays out his analysis of a set of images provided in this post below. He argues that based on their various disclosures concerning the crime scene and evidence, the apparent investigation of the incident carried out by Connecticut state attorney Steven Sedensky defies normal protocols anticipated in such an inquiry.


(more…)




Posted in Interviews, podcast and tagged false flag terror, journalism, news media, Sandy Hook massacre on September 1, 2015.

Found this in the comments over at MHB:

http://www.montefrank.com/

Monte E. Frank of Team 26 and the Connecticut Bar Association

A website dedicated to the disbarment and imprisonment of Monte E. Frank for TREASON

Sandy Hook Researcher Being Suppressed by Police

Published on Sep 13, 2015

You know when you are right on top of them when they threaten to have you arrested. I have struck a nerve and the False Flag is unraveling.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_BtP41IfTE

Also, fyi, pretty sure this guy has some other vids on his channel where he suggests that something called the Fairfield School of Rock (for kids) might have had some involvement in this hoax. I didn't watch all his vids, but there was one where he was suggesting that perhaps the 26 kids who sang at the Superbowl actually came from this school. I first found one of his vids posted on MHB, below his twitter feed in the "no comment" section

New long post over at MHB. Haven't had time to go through it yet. Lots in the comments section too.


http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/09/14...ook-charities/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amanda

New long post over at MHB. Haven't had time to go through it yet. Lots in the comments section too.


http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/09/14...ook-charities/

---

must read imo. great find.

Below is follow up on this post http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/09/14...ook-charities/ which mentions how fake dead Avielle Richman from SH is really Lenie Urbina

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/09/17...ok-researcher/

September 17, 2015
Phantom Party Files Copyright Claim Against Sandy Hook Researcher ¹⁹

by James Tracy • Documents, News • Tags: censorship, Sandy Hook Elementary
Takes issue with posting of Urbina/Richman photo

Updated 9/17/15 2:05PM
A Digital Millenium Copyright Act infringement claim was filed on September 16 against the owner of the “Sandy Hook Hoax” Facebook page concerning photographic images of Lenie Urbina/Avielle Richman. Unsurprisingly, Facebook opted to take the https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...lock.jpg?w=474claim at face value without investigation and remove the image, according to Tony Mead, SHH’s administrator.
Facebook does not disclose what party has filed copyright claims against its users. An appeals, or “counter notification” process leaves the door open to potential litigation by the claimant if ownership of the given image can be produced. Under Facebook’s policy the respondent has no other way of appeal other than and cannot determine who it could be facing in court.
As RT reported, earlier this week fair use advocates were encouraged when a US appellate court in San Francisco ruled that a jury should decide in a case brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation against Universal Music Group on whether Universal adequately considered fair use prior to filing a DMCA complaint against a parent who posted a thirty second recording of their toddler dancing to Prince’s 1984 hit, “Let’s Go Crazy.”
On September 17 “Sandy Hook Hoax” Fb page owner Tony Mead filed a “counter notification” contesting the unknown party’s alleged ownership of the photos.
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...ng?w=474&h=843 https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...ng?w=474&h=843
Share

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/09/22...arity-kingpin/

September 22, 2015
Copyright Infringement Claim Filed By Sandy Hook Charity Kingpin ¹⁹

by James Tracy • Documents, News • Tags: censorship, charity industry, Sandy Hook Elementary
On September 17 MHB reported on a copyright infringement claim filed with Facebook by an anonymous party against the “Sandy Hook Hoax” Fb page alleging ownership of the Lenie Urbina/Avielle Richman photographs. The copyright claimant has been revealed in the emails below as one Thomas Bittman, co-founder of the lucrative “Sandy Hook Promise” charity. The 501(c)3 has been a key proponent of gun control and mental health protocols that it argues will curb mass shootings, while pulling on the heartstrings of America to the tune of tens of millions of dollars in the wake of the December 14, 2012 Sandy Hook massacre event.
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...tman.jpg?w=474Is Sandy Hook Promise co-founder Thomas Bittman filing bogus copyright infringement claims? Source: Jason Rearick, Newstimes.com

What’s significant here is whether Bittman actually holds the copyright to the images in question, and if he’s not just prompting Facebook to abuse the entire DMCA process intended to address legitimate copyright claims. If so, Bittman has likely committed perjury and is subject to being sued for filing a false copyright infringement claim. “If you send a cease-and-desist letter to an infringer,” under DMCA,

there is a risk that the infringer may file a lawsuit in the infringer’s jurisdiction naming you as a defendant and seeking a declaratory judgment that your copyright is invalid. One recent court decision found that the sending of a single cease-and-desist letter into the state was enough to subject the defendant to personal jurisdiction in that state.
If you send a DMCA takedown notice that is both false and meant in bad faith (such as to harass, or doesn’t state a real claim), you have committed perjury. Though unlikely, if the party you sent the takedown notice to decided to pursue this in court, you could face all of the consequences that your state imposes on people who lie in court.

Most MHB readers will likely agree that such legal action against parties that have sought to terrorize the US citizenry and enrich themselves on an entirely dubious incident is richly deserved. We do hope Mr. Anthony Mead pursues this matter to the fullest extent provided by law.

---

From: Facebook <ip+v8jbrna.aeazbsxxduorg@support.facebook.com>
Date: September 21, 2015 at 6:16:46 PM EDT
To: Anthony Mead
Subject: Re: Copyright Counter Complaint: #1631982620387595
Reply-To: Facebook <ip+v8jbrna.aeazbsxxduorg@support.facebook.com>
Hi,
Thank you for your email. As you know, we received a claim of alleged rights infringement regarding the removed content. However, the content in question is outside the scope of the counter-notification provisions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), 17 U.S.C. § 512(g).
If you believe that this content should not have been removed from Facebook, you can contact the complaining party directly to resolve your issue:
Report #: 263811150419388
Contact Information:
Name – Thomas Bittman
Email – tjbittman@
Please keep in mind that the complaining party is not required to respond to you. If an agreement is reached to restore the reported content, please have the complaining party email us at ip@fb.com with their consent and the original report number of their complaint.
Thanks,
Laurel
Intellectual Property Operations
Facebook
—–Original Message—-
From: Anthony Mead
To:
Subject: Copyright Counter Complaint: #1631982620387595
Name: Anthony J Mead
Mailing Address: _______________
Hollywood FL, 33026
USA
Telephone: 954-295—–
Email: Absmover@aol.com
Please provide URL(s)/description leading to where the content appeared on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HoaxAtSandyHook
By submitting this counter-notice, you:consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court for the judicial district in which your address is located, or if your address is outside the United States, for any judicial district in which Facebook, Inc. may be found.agree to accept service of process from the party who reported your content, or that party’s agent.state under penalty of perjury that you have a good faith belief that the material in question was removed or disabled as a result of mistake or misidentification.: I Agree
Electronic Signature: Anthony J Mead
—–End Original Message—–

Here's the latest from Fetzer. Looks like the guy he's interviewing runs the "Crisis Actor" youtube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3e...-8eIaWg/videos). I first found his channel b/c one of his vids was posted on Tracy's MHB. I only listened to a couple of his vids--he seemed to have a connection to some of the key players in the SH hoax (also mentioned something about some connection between SH and the Fairfield School of Rock--maybe that's where those kids singing at the Superbowl came from??) Anyway, I just found this interview w/him and Fetzer, and am posting it here b/c it should be interesting:

The Real Deal Ep # 124 More Light on Dark Recesses of Sandy Hook

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORfYs0YamAE

http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/11/03/the-war-on-nobody-died-at-sandy-hook/

November 3, 2015
The War on “Nobody Died At Sandy Hook” ²⁵

by James Tracy • Home • Tags: alternative media, censorship, propaganda, public opinion, Sandy Hook Elementary
https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...dash.jpg?w=474Flurry of Negative Reviews Attack New Book

Numerous “trolls” and “shills” have harnessed the world’s most popular retailer to attack Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, posting an array of “one star” reviews and derogatory remarks on the book’s Amazon page. The collection of essays was released October 22, edited by Prof. Jim Fetzer and author Mike Palecek, and features in-depth contributions from several academics and independent researchers.


A telling aspect of this controversy is that many of the reviewers admit they have not even read the book before submitting their review. There is the strong probability that this is part of a more elaborate organized campaign led by the well-heeled parties that have directly benefited from the false event.

On the other hand, reviewers who have made the effort to purchase and read the book are unanimously submitting “five star” reviews, often with detailed commentaries.


“A titanic war is taking place on amazon.com over this book,” Fetzer explains to MHB. “Everyone who has read the book has posted a 5-STAR review. A blizzard of 1-STAR reviews is appearing from a legion of phonies, trolls and shills.”

https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...8-am.png?w=474

For example, here is one of several very positive reviews.

https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...8-am.png?w=474


Such reviews are offset by very negative assessments, such as those below, one of which dismisses the volume as “fictitious propaganda.” The second review is submitted by “HONR,”–referencing Lenny Pozner’s “HONR Network,” the dubious organization that has filed bogus copyright claims against the media outlets of independent Sandy Hook researchers.

https://memorygapdotorg.files.wordpr...7-am.png?w=474


The editors and contributors of NDASH are seeking to get the word out against a clearly coordinated program to suppress the evidence and expert analyses encompassed in the book. Here is a recent presentation of the book by Fetzer on his interview program, The Real Deal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEl_1HWFRfo


Fetzer also made an appearance on Susan Lindauer’s Covert Report, broadcast on Truth Frequency Radio.

https://scoopfeeddotnet.files.wordpr...5553.jpg?w=474

Jim Fetzer delivers a shattering analysis of his brand new book, “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook,” which relies on his legendary research into primary sourcing to expose the absolute incongruities of that day. Backed by photos of the crime scene– before the shooting ever took place– Fetzer shows how the psychological operation was planned and executed. Keen observers have noted puzzling omissions of death certificates for the 20 children and 6 adults who allegedly died that day. And the absence of blood saturation from the crime scene.


But Fetzer takes it further, examining ballistic reports that no way did shell slugs at the scene get fired from Adam Lanza’s gun. The ATF report that neither Oto Lanza nor his mother frequented gun ranges in the Connecticut area, and therefore could not be labeled “gun aficianados.” Once again, whether you agree with all of Jim Fetzer’s conclusions, his research is highly provocative and necessary to a complete analysis of whatever events transpired— and did not transpire— on that day. It’s another great interview with a tremendous guest, with a genuine expertise in false flag and psychological operations. He makes a powerful argument that Washington’s playing “Operation Gladio” with unsuspecting American citizens for the sake of ramming gun control over the resistance of America’s untrusting citizens. This interview is Jim Fetzer at his best!

The entire interview is available at Truth Frequency Radio

Latest JTracy podcast. I gather he conducts these interviews on Mondays and posts them to checkinitout.com right away. But for some reason, he then waits until Thursdays to post to MHB, ?!?

Always 1 hour, with a commercials-removed 3 minute silence at the bottom of the hour, ?!?, why not remove the silent period too? Anyways good interview:

Interview 71: Shawn Helton

https://checkinitoutdotcom.files.wor...x115.png?w=620

Associate editor of 21st Century Wire Shawn Helton joins James to discuss his cutting edge media criticism and analysis of the “mass shooter” phenomenon that has become an almost daily subject of corporate news media reportage; one where events including Tucson, Aurora, Newtown have more recently given way to Isla Vista, Charleston, Chattanooga, and countless others.


21st Century Wire is a daring alternative journalistic venture that has in recent years sought to shine a light on such curious events. In this important discussion Helton and Tracy elaborate on their various written accounts of such unusual events. placing them in historical context and reminding listeners of the special caution necessary for news consumers to employ in the police state and “war on terror” era.


Download

Here are a couple of links to info mentioned in Fetzer's latest interview on SH https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORfYs0YamAE

I'm not sure where Fetzer got these photos, though I'm thinking they might be from Allan Powell--he's the Australian guy Fetzer interviewed a couple of times on the photographic evidence on SH. Not sure if all of Powell's photos were from the official evidence site, or whether he might have had some photos sent to him from an insider.

Anyway, the one below seems to show the govt perps in the lobby of SHES before the glass was shot out:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...tid=7903&stc=1

And he says this one shows the govt perps drilling holes into the school (pretend bullet holes):

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...tid=7904&stc=1

And they also mentioned this one, but I'm not sure what the significance is (these images are listed in his latest false flag weekly news, so perhaps he explained it there)

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...tid=7905&stc=1

http://www.badideatshirts.com/Assets..._PEOPLE_DR.jpg

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2015...-3-deanna.html

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Debunking the Sandy Hook Debunkers: #3 Deanna Spingola and C.W. Wade

by Jim Fetzer

The disinformation campaign against NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), like the "active shooter" drills being conducted around the country (where the latest "false flag" attack has occurred in Paris), continues unabated, where there are signs that the enemies of truth are being defeated, one by one, over the course of time, as more and more students of Sandy Hook stand up for truth, where the occurrence of an elaborate hoax in no one died has been demonstrated in this 425-page volume, loaded with photos, documents and records. Here is a video introduction for those who may have missed it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEl_1HWFRfo

A text-book example of disinformation about the book occurred during an interview on RBN by Deanna Spingola of C.D. Wade, Saturday, 14 November 2015, available here. The distinction between "dis-" and "mis-" information is an important one: misinformation only implies that the source has something wrong, while disinformation implies that the source knew what they were asserting was wrong, but asserted it anyway in a deliberate attempt to mislead their audience. It is parallel to saying something that is false (which appears to be an intermittent manifestation of the possession of a mind, as I have else where explained) and lying (which is a practice that is common with devious minds).

Signs of Devious Minds

Having offered courses on logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning for 35-years, it has become second-nature to notice and identify common fallacies when they occur--no matter whether that may be in the context of domestic politics and foreign affairs (which I explore on a regular basis with my co-host, Kevin Barrett, on "False Flag Weekly News") or in the more pedestrian context of internet exchanges and amazon.com reviews. Here are a few of those most widely practiced, which you can test in relation to amazon.com:

(1) The Straw Man: This fallacy is committed by exaggerating the position you attack to make it easier--often, much easier--to debunk. Those who have argued for the existence of a conspiracy in the death of JFK, for example, might be suppose to be claiming that the conspirators--the SPONSORS, the MECHANICS, and the FACILITATORS--all met at the same time (rather like a rally in Washington Stadium), which is absurd. But it was thrown at me by Robert Artwohl, which I dispatched in ASSASSINATION SCIENCE (1998), pp. 85-92.

(2) Special Pleading: This fallacy occurs when you cite only evidence that is favorable to your side and ignore the rest. The new book by David Talbot, THE DEVIL'S CHESSBOARD (2015), for example, attributes the assassination to Allen Dulles, Director of the CIA, in an audacious attempt to distract attention from LBJ, who forced himself on the ticket in LA to ascend to the presidency when JFK was taken out. Lyndon even sent Cliff Carter, his chief administrative assistant, down to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements were in place.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-NzIllAU6FS...2Bresponse.jpg

(3) The Ad Hominum: This "attack on the man" entails attacking the messenger when you cannot cope with the message. A recent example occurs in the review by Dark Shadow on amazon.com (now removed), where she assailed me as a Holocaust denier and someone who does not believe we landed men on the moon. In this case, she is combing the ad hominem with The Appeal to Popular Sentiments, taking for granted that most people believe the "official" Holocaust narrative and that we did go to the moon, hoping they will never consider the proof to the contrary presented in AND I SUPPOSE WE DIDN'T GO TO THE MOON, EITHER? (2015), which demonstrates that neither belief can be sustained.

To test your mastery of these common fallacies, go to 1-STAR reviews of ASSASSINATION SCIENCE (1998) on amazon.com. This book shattered the cover-up by publishing proof that the autopsy X-rays had been altered to conceal a massive fist-sized blow-out at the back of the head (in the case of the lateral cranial X-ray) and by adding a 6.5mm metallic slice to implicate the obscure weapon Oswald was alleged to have used (in the case of the anterior-posterior X-ray) and that another brain had been substituted for that of JFK (because once they patched up the hole, there was nowhere for his brains to have gone).

These were not my findings, either, but those of David W. Mantik, M.D., Ph.D., in the case of the X-ray studies and of Robert Livingston, M.D., a world authority on the human brain, in the case of the latter. But you would not know that from these 1-STAR reviews, which were calculated to bring down the average rating of the book to suppress reader interest. As in the case of the Sandy Hook book, I brought together multiple experts on different aspects of the case to contribute their specific findings. Indeed, one pseudo-critic of THE WARREN REPORT (1964), Josiah Thompson, even called the book "Assassinated Science"!

The Spingola/Wade Interview

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ma_w_BEK68....W.%2BWade.jpg

The opening segment includes discussion of Columbine, where the response teams were very circumspect about entering the building, and Sandy Hook, where C.W. Wade praises their courage in rushing into the school. Wade takes for granted that an active shooter, Adam Lanza, was at Sandy Hook and would have killed more students and staff, but for the heroic actions of the first responders. Taking for granted an issue at stake is known as begging the question. It required no "heroism" to simulate confronting a active shooter, when they knew no active shooter present, which appears to have been the case here.

In passing, Wade mentions that the Paris attack had just taken place and that many were assuming that it had been a staged event and then went about "scouring the internet for evidence". But, from the point of view of logic, it doesn't matter which came first: the theory or the evidence. What matters is the strength of the evidence that supports any alternative theories. Logic is atemporal. But a basic condition of scientific reasoning--the requirement of total evidence--that conclusions must be based on all the available, relevant evidence, which means that special pleading violates the scientific reasoning.

According to Wade, nothing is going to affect "the hard core hoaxer", because their minds are made up and they don't want to be bothered with facts. But for a claim to qualify as a "fact", it has to be both true and verifiable, which means there has to be sufficient evidence to prove that that claim is true. He talks about Adam Lanza having killed so many people in about 15 minutes (with around a 96% kill-to-target ratio), which Wade acknowledges is "incredible". But when you look at the circumstances, he claims, it did not require any special skill, training or expertise to do it, which is quite frankly absurd.

Joyce Riley, "The Power Hour", for example, interviewed firearms expert, Mike Powers, on her show, who explained that this shooting was simply preposterous, even for someone with an extensive background and training. Sofia Smallstorm, in "Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 Dimensions", begins with a monologue by another expert, who similarly explains that this was an incredible--literally, unbelievable--performance, which I can personally confirm on the basis of my experience as a commissioned officer in the Marine Corps. I served as a Series Commander at the Recruit Depot in San Diego (1964-65), where I had 300 recruits and 15 DIs under my command, including marksmanship training.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1yfJDCMU64

Listening to Wade casually dismiss the suggestion that a 112-lb., six-foot-tall young man--said to suffer from Asperger's Syndrome, which entails poor motor coordination--could not possibly have done the shooting provides convincing proof that, if someone has their mind made up and is impervious to facts, it would be C.W. Wade. This is a striking example of the violation of the requirement of total evidence: multiple experts have affirmed that he could not have done it, where Wade substitutes his ignorance for their expertise.

How could he not know?

As it happens, I have engaged in public debates with several of the most notorious apologists for the Sandy Hook hoax, including Keith Johnson. Because he had contended that registration signs and name tags on lanyards were “standard police procedures” at crime scenes, I contacted Jim Rothstein, a Gold Shield Detective from New York City, whom I know from JFK research, and asked him if that was indeed a common practice or if he had ever heard of it being done. His response was plain and simple: “No.” He thought that this was a ridiculous claim to make. And so did I, because of which I make that point in the second round of our debate.

During the third round of the first debate, I also observed that, although the “official narrative” would have you believe that Adam Lanza was a firearms fanatic, ATF Special Assistant Agent Gene Marquez said that his agency “has not been able to uncover any evidence that the mother and the son were actively engaged in going to the gun ranges, practicing marksmanship, or anything of that nature.” I published this in "Wolfgang Halbig heads to Newtown for the truth about Sandy Hook" (originally published on 24 March 2014). Could C.D. Wade have missed it?

During the second hour of her interview with Mike Power, Joyce Riley mentions a Wall Street Journal article that stated they couldn’t find any evidence of Nancy or Adam Lanza going to any of the shooting ranges in that local area. In a video, “No Gun Permit Under Nancy Lanza’s Name in public records, says TIME Magazine”, at 57 sec mark, there is a screen shot from TIME, saying that in a public records search, they could find no firearms or weapons permits under Nancy’s name. Could C.W. Wade, a self-declared Sandy Hook expert, have missed this, too?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2CJVaYHqBw

Video description: Published on Jan 11, 2013- So gun permit records are public knowledge, and major news outlets are unable to find any for Nancy Lanza. Not even for the AR-15 rifle? The police are saying that those guns were registered to her and she had permits for them, but apparently the public records themselves are not supporting their theories.

It is possible that C.W. Wade has remained ignorant of the evidence supporting the conclusion that Adam Lanza could not have performed the feat of shooting attributed to him? Could he have missed Mike Powers on "The Power Hour"? Could he have missed the intro monologue to "Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 Dimensions"? Could have missed my public debate with Keith Johnson, one of his staunchest allies in the battle against "the Sandy Hook hoaxers"? None of that strikes me as remotely plausible, which means that C.W. has to know much better.

The drill and the manual

The most interesting portion of their discussion was about the nature of FEMA drills and whether we have "the FEMA manual" for the event. Wade talks about the difference between a drill and an an actual emergency, where they would not have used emergency vehicles and sirens to rush to the site in the case of a drill, which means (to him) that it had to be real. Spingola talks about the fact that a FEMA drill would not be conducted in an elementary school in the first place. But they are begging the question and ignoring that this was NOT "an ordinary FEMA drill":

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-5znlP_gmEU...Bemergency.jpg

To create the impression of a real emergency, they had to feign that it WAS a real emergency, which seems to be an obvious observation that lies beyond the imagination of the parties to this conversation. But they did not do a good job of it, because the proof that it was not a bona fide emergency was surprisingly apparent from the beginning: no surge of EMTS into the building; no Med-Evac helicopter was called; no string of ambulances to the school; no evacuation of 469 other students; no bodies placed on the triage tarps. The road was so clogged that no emergency vehicles could have reached the school (apart from a token fire truck), had they wanted to:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vcjL8JFxLq...%2Broad%2B.jpg

Paul Preston, a Los Angeles area school safety expert, found the reports from Sandy Hook so peculiar that he reached out to his contacts in the Obama Department of Education, each of whom confirmed that it had been a drill, that no children had died and that it was to promote gun-control, which is found in Chapter 6--but not a peep from Spingola or Wade. The manual explains why we had so many oddities at the time: the sign, "Everyone must check in!", boxes of bottled water and pizza at the Firehouse; Port-a-Potties present from scratch; many present wearing name tags on lanyards; parents bringing children to the scene! It was a two-day drill, with the rehearsal on the 13th and going LIVE on the 14th, which explains otherwise inexplicable oddities like these.

Three Classic Fallacies

During his interview with Deanna Spingola, C.W. Wade committed other fallacies, where the violation of the requirement of total evidence qualifies as special pleading, citing only the evidence favorable to your side and omitting the rest. Here are other examples, where those who review the entire conversation are bound to discover many more:

(1) He and Deanna talked about "the Fetzer/Tracy book", as though James F. Tracy and I were the only authors. But there are a dozen contributors, whose names are listed on the back cover of the book and where the Contributors pages provide fairly nice bio-sketches about each of them. Is that something of which either Spingola or Wade could possibly have been unaware? Anyone can find their names by going to amazon.com and looking at the back cover there:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WdHAXzBqo8...25281%2529.jpg

Or were they concealing the truth because admitting that there were a dozen or more contributors--thirteen, including series editor, Mike Palecek. who is not an expert on Sandy Hook--six of whom are (current or retired college professors) with Ph.D.s--Vivian Lee, Ph.D.; Sterling Harwood, J.D., Ph.D.; Dr. Eowyn, Ph.D.; Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D.; James F. Tracy, Ph.D.; and Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.--would have made them look absurd. So they simply left it out.

(2) They talked about debunking the morning photo, which appears as Exhibit 26 on page 148; but they ignore the proof that this photo was taken before the event had even taken place, which is the point: the windows of Classroom 10 are unbroken in Exhibit 26, which can easily be ascertained by comparing Exhibit 26 with Exhibit 30 on page 149. where they are broken, and with Exhibit 42 on page 154, where they are not. And Wayne Carver, M.E., is already there before the shooting has officially taken place! Q.E.D.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-HZkPMhrp03...hibit%2B26.jpg

Notice they do not discuss the Nancy Lanza bedroom, which shows a red smear (which does not look like blood) on the bed and where (in their haste to furnish the room) they left a moving pad beneath the left-front leg. Their willingness to ignore even the most blatant proof of fraud and fakery reveals therole they are playing in relation to Sandy Hook:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hHoGG9wSMq...%2Bbedroom.jpg

Spingola and Wade make their case against Exhibit 26 because the caption says that it was taken on the morning of 14 December 2012. Allan William Powell, who contributed that chapter, has acknowledged mistaking a sunset for a sunrise, which we will correct in a future printing. But what could be more convincing proof (a) that Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax than to have Dr. Carver and the SWAT team present with crime scene tape already up before the crime has been committed and (b) that Spingola and Wade are not honest brokers but are willing deceive and mislead the public about the truth?

Shannon Hick's "iconic" photograph

(3) Wade also attempted to discount the proof that Shannon Hick's "iconic" photograph of a police woman leading a string of around 15 kids away from the school had been staged, which we have proven based upon at least three considerations:

(a) there was frost on the ground in Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012, when the ground temperature was 28*F; but there is no frost on the ground in Shannon Hick's photograph, which means that it was not taken on 14 December 2012 and is therefore not authentic;

(b) a second photo Shannon has acknowledged having taken shows the kids in a different sequence, where one is led by a little girl in a pink sweater, the other by a (much larger) little boy in a dark shit and blue jeans, which means they arranged the kids to get "the best shot"; and,

(c) there are parents present with their arms folded or hands in their pockets, but how could they possible have been present at the time? Did someone at the school decide to call parents as Adam Lanza was shooting it up and urge them to rush down for photographs?

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-owtcMXToBX...photograph.jpg

Taking a closer look, we find more parents"lounging at the massacre":

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-p6CtztuGHq...2Bmassacre.jpg

Wade trades on an equivocation, claiming that we were basing our conclusions on "fuzzy photographs". But while the photos published in the book, especially in black-and-white, could be claimed to be "fuzzy", the original articles on which this research was based are not "fuzzy" at all. And Spengola knows better, because she has a copy of the pdf of the book, which I send to Dave Gahary and he forwarded to her for a forthcoming debate.

C.W. Wade repeatedly describes us as "liars", as though we had asserted something false while knowing it was false in a deliberate attempt to deceive our intended audience. Allan made a simple mistake about the time of day; but that was an innocuous mistake, which we are going to correct. Exhibit 26 was taken before the shooting had occurred. The case is less simple for Wade and Spingola. Lies are abounding here, but not from us.

Fetzer's book now free pdf; he mentioned to Rense that the hard copy uses black/white photos coz color would've raised the price to ~$60 or so, but this pdf has high quality color pics.

http://rense.com/1.mpicons/nobodydiedfetzer.jpg


edit:

• CENSORSHIP SHOCK: Amazon.com bans investigative book ‘Nobody Died at Sandy Hook’ because it disagrees with government version of what happened November 23, 2015

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

Fetzer's book now free pdf; he mentioned to Rense that the hard copy uses black/white photos coz color would've raised the price to ~$60 or so, but this pdf has high quality color pics.

---

The PDF copy I just downloaded has really lousy resolution in the photos. We have most of the images in this thread at much better resolution.