Coronavirus

Dachsie comment:

Please go to original substack posting for fully hyperlinked and formatted text.

The scientists and university administrators KNOW the "COVID vaccines" are not safe and are not effective. No human being of any age should take any of these injections. My loose paraphrase here -- I have heard, Dr. Pierre Kory and other doctors say that the booster shots are really the "kill shot." You might get by without injury or illness from the basic 2-shots but the boosters are much more likely to cause injury and illness.

It was so easy for university professors and staff to be forced and coerced at the threat of their job, their livelihood, and their entire professional career, when they know full well the vaccines and boosters are bad and have increased unnecessary risk, to say nothing of constitutional and statutory federal ad state laws that prohibit their distribution and administration at entities that receive state and federal funding or any kind.

(While this Substack posting below specifically references the mRNA vaccines and the AstraZeneca and the Johnson & Johnson "COVID Vaccines" are not mRNA vaccines, this warning also applies to them. Those two use the "viral vector" technology and uses a human adenovirus, or a cold virus to "program" your cells. However, those two vaccines are associated with blood clotting and are also not safe and effective.) All of these "COVID vaccines" are only experimental for "emergency use."

Yet these educational institutions deliberately sell out the students, faculty, staff, and their academic integrity and reputation forever.

Respect and integrity are no longer terms to be associated with these evil and unlawful educational entity policies.

________________

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email

Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Twelve reasons why universities need to drop their COVID mandates now

Many universities are still mandating that students get vaccinated and boosted. The scientific evidence is crystal clear on boosters: they are unethical. The colleges don't care.

Steve Kirsch

9 hr ago October 5, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...44_747x731.png

Harvard requires students to get the new bivalent booster. After all, it was tested on eight mice and all of them got Omicron so it is proven not to work.

All universities should drop their COVID vaccine mandates immediately.

Here are 12 reasons why.

Mandates are unethical because the harms clearly outweigh the benefits; it isn’t even a close call. A new paper by top scientists at Harvard, Johns Hopkins, Oxford, and UCSF show that the risks clearly outweigh the benefits. The paper states unequivocally that university booster mandates are unethical and provides five different reasons, each of which is sufficient on its own to halt the mandates.

The newest booster doesn’t have a single safety study showing a net all-cause mortality or morbidity benefit. The new Pfizer bivalent booster was tested on just 8 mice. It was never tested on humans. We have no idea what the all-cause mortality and morbidity profile of this new combination is. No one at Stanford could possibly know this. This lack of safety vs. efficacy data is why Dr. Paul Offit, one of the most respected vaccinologists in the world, refuses to take the new booster. If Dr. Offit is refusing the booster, why are we forcing Stanford students to take it?

Universities are still claiming that “vaccines help protect our community” when we know this is no longer true. The official narrative has changed to “vaccines will help you avoid hospitalization and death.” That is not a community benefit. It is a personal benefit. It should be a personal choice.

We don’t know the true risk because the CDC has been ignoring the COVID vaccine safety signals since the start of the vaccination program nearly 2 years ago. The CDC isn’t monitoring any of the COVID vaccines for safety signals. For example, the safety signal for “death” was satisfied, but the CDC hasn’t acknowledged this. Why should we trust the CDC if they aren’t doing even the most basic safety monitoring?

The people making the decision to mandate the vaccines refuse to be held accountable. There have not been any public debates on college mandates anywhere. When students and faculty try to question the policy makers, in every instance, the policy makers refuse to provide answers. I believe that the reason for this is that mandating vaccines and boosters is simply indefensible and college administrators do not want to be embarrassed.

The CDC is ignoring credible data showing the vaccines are unsafe. There was very significant safety data discovered by a scientific panel appointed by the Israeli Ministry of Health showing that the COVID vaccines were not nearly as safe as had been claimed by world governments. I asked over 250 people who work in vaccine safety at the CDC and not a single person wanted to see the data. Even Stanford Professor Grace Lee who heads the CDC’s outside vaccine safety committee refused to answer whether she wanted to see the data (she called the police in lieu of answering the question).

Where there is risk, there must be choice. There is no question that the vaccines have risk because there are over 1,200 papers published in the peer-reviewed medical literature on adverse events associated with the COVID vaccines.

The CDC now recognizes natural immunity. Greta Massetti who wrote the most recently updated CDC guidelines stated that 95% of the population has some level of immunity so why are universities still forcing vaccines when new guidelines "represent an increasing focus on individuals making their own decisions about their level of risk and how they want to mitigate that risk”?

The world’s most highly respected doctors are now reversing their position on the vaccine. Doctors Peter McCullough, Paul Marik, and most recently, Aseem Malhotra are all prominent doctors who switched sides to speaking out against the COVID vaccines after carefully studying the data. These top doctors have one thing in common: when they looked at the data directly themselves, they were all appalled at what they found.

University faculty who have expertise in vaccine science are choosing to remain silent when asked for comment. For example, at Stanford, I asked Professors Yvonne Maldonado, David Relman, and Grace Lee to comment on the justification for the Stanford vaccine policy and all declined to respond.

No data transparency. We know for sure that vaccine killed at least one college student. Are colleges disclosing to kids the number of students who died from the vaccine vs. the number of kids who died from COVID? Why is the FDA hiding the autopsy reports on people who died after getting the COVID? Are colleges explaining this lack of transparency to students who they are forcing to take the vaccine?

No transparency about what is in the vaccine vials. It is illegal to get vaccine vials to analyze to assess how intact the mRNA instructions are. This was a major problem during testing and there is no data it was ever solved. We are not permitted to know if the mRNA is degraded because nobody is allowed to analyze the vials. Nobody should be mandated to take an injection of an unknown substance that nobody is allowed to verify.

For more information on the status of college mandates, see “An Update on College Mandates.”

This is just the short list of reasons for dropping the mandates. There is a 72-page justification described in this article How Data Compelled a Columbia U Researcher to Fight Mandates: A Conversation with Dr. Spiro Pantazatos.
Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Thousands of paid subscribers

I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQDghpktskk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQDghpktskk

TrialSiteNews.com

The FDA Misled the Public About Ivermectin and Should Be Accountable in Court, Argues AAPS


TrialSite News

Join The Conversation! | https://trialsitenews.com/

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its motion and amicus brief Thursday evening with the federal district court in Galveston urging it to allow the lawsuit to proceed against the FDA for its misleading statements against ivermectin. In Apter v. HHS, a group of physicians sued to hold the Food and Drug Administration, a federal agency within the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), accountable for its alleged interference with physicians’ ability to treat Covid-19.

_______________
Here is the article from TrialSiteNews.com site

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/the-...-aaps-5bf42b41

The FDA Misled the Public About Ivermectin and Should Be Accountable in Court, Argues AAPS

TrialSite Staff
Staff at TrialSite | Quality Journalism
Oct. 3, 2022, 6:30 p.m.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) filed its motion and amicus brief Thursday evening with the federal district court in Galveston urging it to allow the lawsuit to proceed against the FDA for its misleading statements against ivermectin. In Apter v. HHS, a group of physicians sued to hold the Food and Drug Administration, a federal agency within the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), accountable for its interference with physicians’ ability to treat Covid-19.

The Age of Politicization of Medicine

The Age of Politicization of Medicine

Branded as a politically conservative organization, mainstream media during the pandemic has alleged that this physician organization (AAPS) has promoted conspiracy theories. Of course, one of the topics of contention is ivermectin itself, which has become a highly politicized drug, whether it works or not. Traditionally, physicians had the right to prescribe off-label regimens if they disclosed the risks to their patients. Those traditional physician rights seem to be thrown out the window.
Ivermectin: A Fact Check

Of course, this all changed with the COVID-19 pandemic. Doctors were no longer free to just work with patients based on what they assessed was best for them. With a major overreach of the federal government and corresponding umbrella licensing board associations such as the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), the federal government has inserted itself, carefully, not directly into the affairs of doctors during the pandemic.

This media suggests that by no means is ivermectin a panacea or some magic bullet cure for COVID-19. It’s not. In fact, where it has been successfully used it’s always been part of a combination regimen. Such as in India and Bangladesh or even in Zimbabwe. Early on, good results surfaced even from America during the ICON study–but this was more an observational study than a randomized controlled study. The latter is required for the establishment of evidence. During the pandemic, TrialSite has chronicled many material studies and significant real-world activity exhibiting some promise. The Uttar Pradesh public health initiative is one that this media tracked closely during the spring of 2021 and was most certainly noteworthy despite mainstream media’s tendency to follow a script influenced by government and advertisers.

While dozens of mostly low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have authorized the use of ivermectin during at least some part of the pandemic, and with 92 human studies involving ivermectin (against mostly in LMICs) some evidence has accumulated that the drug may help in some instances inhibit SARS-CoV-2, particularly when combined with doxycycline and others. But regulators, apex research institutes, and medical establishments in the first world have questioned these studies with positive results (assuming they are badly designed, for example) while focusing on a few high-profile studies with no efficacious results (e.g. TOGETHER, COVID-OUT, Lopez-Medina, and ACTIV-6), even though ACTIV-6 has initiated an ivermectin study with a higher dosage. Critics have argued that among other things studies such as TOGETHER were underdosed.

On the other hand, it appears that ivermectin just doesn't work in some cases, especially as the variants mutated. Is it possible that the drug has worked to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in some instances and not in others? You bet!

We know that physicians had to boost the dosage during the Delta surge and undoubtedly groups such as the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) have had to evolve their off-label protocols.

It’s hard to know with any degree of certainty, but regardless, ivermectin is overall a very safe drug and if a doctor and patient decide that they would like to give it a try under a controlled, physician-prescribed regimen, the federal government shouldn’t be involved in those local transactions. Of course, with mounting pressure, now a doctor can lose their license for discussing the drug since it can fall under the “misinformation” category. This is actually a form of censorship.

The FDA most certainly crossed the line when elements within the agency went on a campaign to classify the drug as only an animal drug. It went to war against the drug when TrialSite reported the prescriptions went from 3,000 per week prior to the pandemic to nearly 90,000 per week during a point in 2021. See that story.

The FDA secures about 40% of its budget from pharma fees and elements within TrialSite’s network, suggesting Merck, Pfizer, and other commercial sponsors sought the lucrative SARS-CoV-2 antiviral market for themselves. Too much money was at stake. Think about it. Pfizer will bring $22 billion in 2022 alone. This represents a staggering amount of money.

Back to ivermectin: the drug led to a Nobel Prize and has helped eradicate parasite-borne diseases via Mectizan and other programs. But this media also notices that conversely, there are ivermectin enthusiasts that are not objective as well. When this media reports on a study that shows no efficacy, TrialSite receives less than enthusiastic responses from multiple channels. We are even accused of becoming industry or government “shills.” Yes, the environment of medicine and health has never been so biased and unobjective.

It most certainly doesn’t boil down to some maniacal right-wing agenda, where those that are anti-vax prefer ivermectin and polite liberal society gets their vaccination and Paxlovid when they need protection and therapy for COVID-19. This false dichotomy–a divide and conquer strategy set up by elements of the U.S. government working with the media and medical establishment—ensures that different factions don’t converse, engage and find common ground.
Back to the Action by AAPS

In this recently announced amicus brief to the court, the conservative group promulgated:

“Defendant FDA has improperly exploited misunderstandings about the legality and prevalence of off-label uses of medication, in order to mislead courts, state medical boards, and the public into thinking there is anything improper about off-label prescribing.” They continued, “Not only is off-label prescribing fully proper, legal, and commonplace, but it is also absolutely necessary in order to give effective care to patients.”

Yet the FDA published multiple statements and sent letters to influential organizations to falsely disparage ivermectin, implying that it was not approved for treating Covid-19. Many, including courts and state medical boards, were misled by the FDA into thinking that its lack of approval for this treatment meant that ivermectin should not be used to treat COVID-19.
Improper and Immoral Interference

“It has never been proper for the FDA to interfere with that essential part of the practice of medicine, and the FDA knows it,” AAPS informed the court. The FDA “insisted and continues to insist on interfering with the prescription of this safe medication by physicians in treating Covid-19,” AAPS added.

AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly pointed out to the court that the FDA “has engaged in a campaign of interference with the proper use by physicians of ivermectin, which has long been approved as fully safe for human use.” He alerted the court that once the FDA approves a medication as safe, then physicians have full authority to prescribe it to treat any illness, particularly a novel virus-like Covid-19.
About AAPS

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943. Its motto is omnia pro aegroto (everything for the patient).

Steve Kirsch's newsletter

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/w...m_source=email

Why did the CDC hide the V-safe data from the American people for almost 2 years?

Because it clearly shows that these vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines we've ever created, that's why.

Steve Kirsch
3 hr ago October 5, 2022

Executive summary

V-safe is a voluntary safety monitoring program put in place by the CDC to monitor adverse reactions after people take a vaccine. The V-safe data shows that 33.1% of the people who got the vaccine suffered from a significant adverse event and 7.7% had to seek professional medical care. These are extraordinary numbers. They clearly show the vaccines are unsafe, that the CDC deliberately hid this information from the American public, and that the drug companies falsified the data in the trials.

But now, thanks to the efforts of an extraordinary attorney, Aaron Siri, the numbers are available to the public for the first time.

This data clearly shows that the CDC is not protecting the American people. They are protecting the manufacturers of the vaccines.

The mainstream media is ignoring this story. So is the mainstream medical community. None of them want the American people to know the truth about how unsafe these vaccines are.

About V-safe

V-safe is a voluntary monitoring system put in place by the CDC to monitor adverse events after vaccination.

When you get a COVID vaccine, you get a card to enroll in the V-safe program. Everyone is encouraged to enroll to let the CDC know how safe (or not) the vaccine is.

Slightly over 10M people chose to participate in the program for the COVID vaccines.

V-safe then reaches out to you on a regular basis to see how things are going.

If you report a serious adverse event, you get a phone call from a CDC contractor encouraging you to file a VAERS report. I know this because when I reported my insulin requirements shot up after the vaccine to unprecedented levels, I got one of these calls.

Unlike the VAERS system, the V-safe data is almost “fully reported” because people sign up at the time they are vaccinated BEFORE they have any symptoms. Thus, we know that the denominator is 10.1M. It is not fully reported because even after people sign up, many people will ignore the subsequent V-safe requests to enter their information. Therefore, the percentages reported in V-safe are likely to under-estimate the severity of any problem.

The events recorded in V-safe are also very generic, with only a few predefined categories.

The CDC stopped pushing this system around May 2021 after it became crystal clear that it was accumulating data that showed the vaccines were unsafe.

V-safe and VAERS vs. Israeli safety monitoring

Both of the US safety monitoring programs (V-safe and VAERS) are not nearly as comprehensive as the monitoring system that the Israeli government put in place in Israel a year after the vaccination program started. The Israeli system monitored far more adverse events and proved the vaccines actually caused serious adverse events that never resolved and were not acknowledged by the drug companies.

Like the CDC did with V-safe, the Israeli government hid all of that safety data from the Israeli people until someone leaked a video of the Israeli officials discussing how disturbing the safety data was. The press (other than Neil Oliver on GB News) refused to cover the story. There was no investigation as to why this important safety data was kept secret and nobody in Israel is calling for an investigation either. They don’t want to know because it would make them look bad for pushing the vaccines on everyone.

The V-safe data has been kept hidden from everyone

The CDC has never released the V-safe data they collected to the American public or anyone else for that matter.

All requests for the data have been ignored by the CDC.

It is never summarized for the American people. Ever.

The V-safe data is never talked about in any of the meetings of the ACIP committee (ACIP the CDC outside safety committee on vaccines) or the VRBPAC

In fact, none of the ACIP committee members has ever asked about this data because they don’t want to know how safe the vaccines are. It’s the same reason that none of them want to see the safety data collected by the Israeli government that shows the vaccines are unsafe. I know this because I’ve emailed members of both the CDC and FDA outside committee members offering to show them this data (which is currently available only via special arrangement), and none of them wanted to see it. I emailed them on Sept 9 and again on Sept 13, 2022, subject line: “Do you want to see the safety data that was concealed by the Israeli Ministry of Health?” There were no replies. I just checked again.

All of the FDA and CDC outside committee members know that their job is to give the appearance of impartial outside oversight. They all know if they asked probing questions that they would be kicked off the committee. So nobody asks. “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is their modus operandi.

The effort to get the V-safe data

Have you ever wondered why the CDC never revealed any of the V-safe data to the American public?

If the vaccines are as safe as they claimed, why has the CDC kept this safety information a secret? Why not reveal it and eliminate vaccine hesitancy?

The short answer is because the data is devastating. That’s why they hid it.

Fortunately for us, we have Del Bigtree and Aaron Siri. Del Bigtree is an American hero and host of The Highwire. Among other things, Del funds the efforts of intrepid lawyer Aaron Siri. Siri is like a dog on a bone on projects to unearth the truth. He will not be stopped. He’s a hero.

Watch this video clip from Fox News which highlights that it took two lawsuits and 463 days after the first request before the CDC was forced to release the V-Safe data which showed that 7.7% had to seek medical care after vaccination. 25% missed work, school, or had bad reactions to the vaccine.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CjUXKmvL2cy/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY%3D

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...8c_751x498.png

Let me repeat that. After this critical safety data was legally requested, the CDC spent 463 days stonewalling attorney Aaron Siri in his efforts to obtain the data and make it public. Why would they do that? This is key safety data that the American people have a right to know since many Americans (including kids) are being forced to get the shot. How does stonewalling this request keep America safe?

Here’s what the data they got from the CDC shows (see the captions):
33.1% of the 10.1M people who participated in the V-safe monitoring program experienced significant adverse health impacts
7.7% of the 10.1M users who voluntarily participated in the US government V-safe program had to seek medical care after the COVID vaccine. That is unprecedented. This is why the CDC has been hiding this data from the American public.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...5_1823x910.png

33.1% of the 10.1M people who participated in the V-safe monitoring program experienced significant adverse health impacts

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...0_1813x852.png

Those are unacceptably high numbers and the CDC knew that. That is precisely why they stonewalled attorney Aaron Siri for so long to keep the data under wraps. They were hoping to win and not produce the data at all.

Think about it… if the data showed the vaccines were safe, why would the CDC not release any summary data at all for V-safe?

Do you think that inspires trust that they hid the data showing the vaccines were so harmful?

See this press release for more detail or you can view the data yourself here just like I did.

If this doesn’t completely shatter your trust in the CDC, please read this article on how the CDC ignored (and continues to ignore) the most important safety signal in history: the death signal from the COVID vaccines.

Response from the CDC: crickets

I just left a voicemail for Martha Sharan at the CDC to explain:

Why did the CDC stonewall Aaron Siri for 463 days before releasing the data?

Why didn’t the CDC voluntarily release the data before now?

I don’t expect any response. She never responds to any of my questions. I pointed out to her (yet again) that I don’t want to spread “misinformation” but that by not responding to my inquiry, I will have to assume that the CDC didn’t release the safety information because they didn’t want anyone to know how unsafe the vaccines are.

If she responds, I’ll post her response here. I left her my personal cell phone number and encouraged her to call, just like I always do.
Response from members of Congress

I’ve brought this article to the attention of John Garamendi, Bill Foster, Ro Khanna, Anna Eshoo, and others for comment. I don’t expect to hear from any of them because they don’t want to make the CDC look bad. I’m sure they would be accused of “being anti-science” by their peers if they criticized the CDC for withholding safety data.

I’m still looking for someone other than Senator Ron Johnson to speak up about this.

Summary

The CDC needs to explain to the American public why they hid the V-safe data for so long, why they refused to voluntarily release it, and why they failed to let the American public know that the COVID vaccines triggered the “death” safety signal.

The mainstream press needs to explain why they aren’t asking these questions and choosing to ignore writing about this.

Members of Congress need to explain to the American people why they are sitting on the sidelines and not calling for an investigation.

The mainstream medical community needs to explain to the American people why they are remaining silent while all this is happening.

Universities need to explain why, in light of these revelations, they are continuing to mandate vaccinations for their students.

Please share this article. Every American needs to know about this.


___________________

Dachsie comment:

This is just more damning evidence on top of cascading damning evidence. "

As Dr. Stan used to say "What did they know and when did they know it?"

"Members of Congress need to explain to the American people why they are sitting on the sidelines and not calling for an investigation."


How many more people have to be maimed or killed waiting for another "Congressional investigation." ?

Fauci has indicated that he accepts as true the official narrative of January 6 event. We saw how dishonest and distorted the investigation of that event was by Congress.

Even if such a congressional investigation of these damning data were to ensue, there is no guarantee that the matter would be issued a criminal referral to the DOJ and of course then the DOJ will do nothing or do something dishonest and distorted to effect a miscarriage of justice.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...7-c2a9529e79d0

hildrenshealthdefense.org
COVID Vaccination Likely Cause of Man’s Acquired Hemophilia A + More
By The Defender Staff
10-13 minutes

The Defender’s COVID NewsWatch provides a roundup of the latest headlines related to the SARS CoV-2 virus, including its origins and COVID vaccines.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.
COVID Vaccination Likely Cause of Man’s Acquired Hemophilia A

Hemophilia News Today reported:

​​COVID-19 vaccines, because they work to stimulate the immune system, may be an emerging cause of autoimmune conditions like acquired hemophilia A, according to a case report. “This report aims to highlight the risk of … [acquired hemophilia A] following an immune stimulus, thus improving our knowledge regarding possible vaccination-related adverse events,” the researchers wrote.

The case, involving a man who developed the bleeding condition after receiving the vaccine and was initially treated improperly, also highlights the importance of educating physicians about this potential side effect. The case report, “Acquired hemophilia A following COVID-19 vaccination — The importance of prompt diagnosis: A case report,” was published in the journal Transfusion and Apheresis Science.

Researchers reported a case of acquired hemophilia A following COVID-19 vaccination in a 71-year-old-man admitted to their hospital in Italy. The man had previously been admitted to another emergency center with symptoms of arm pain and swelling associated with limited movement and petechiae (tiny spots of bleeding under the skin). He sought help eight days after a second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.
_______________

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...002695#fig0005

Acquired hemophilia A following COVID-19 vaccination – The importance of prompt diagnosis: A case report

Excerpts:

"A 71-year-old male patient was admitted to Emergency Department (ED) in another center, reporting right arm pain and swelling associated with limited range of motion, together with a non-traumatic onset of diffuse petechiae, eight days after receiving the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2, Comirnaty, Pfizer/BioNTech). "

I do not know if this "Comirnaty" label means that this is a different formula from the Phizer COVID vaccine that has been maiming and killing people all around the world for almost the last two years.

________________

"Regarding our case, it appears evident that the patient was not appropriately managed initially due to an unrecognized AHA diagnosis and the inappropriate and dangerous use of anticoagulant therapy in the absence of thrombosis on Doppler ultrasound. AHA represents a medical emergency, and given the clinical manifestations, it is frequently managed in an emergency room setting, where due to the physicians’ inexperience, it can lead to delays in diagnosis, aggravating the prognosis, and causing a waste of resources (e.g., useless diagnostic investigations, hold of adequate therapeutic strategies, days of hospitalization). "

Dachsie comment: It appears this patient received a blood thinner in the emergency room and the patient was eventually diagnosed with a serious bleeding disorder of hemophilia.

_____________
Dachsie comment:

More very bad news about the "vaccines." There is absolutely no way a legitimate Informed Consent document can be prepared and then a signature obtained in connection with any of these experimental unknown injections.

This is the first hemophilia diagnosis that I have heard of in connection with the COVID Phizer mRNA vaccine.

I think there is one kind of hemophilia that requires "Factor VIII" aka Factor 8, injection for bleeding episode. This is blood product that comes from human blood plasma.

I do not know if Factor 8 would be the treatment for the kind of hemophelia this patient was diagnosed with. I do not know if the kind of treatment that this patient will need will include a blood product. But I do know that our blood supply is now ruined by the Red Cross not making sure that blood and blood products are not made from blood that was obtained from a person who had the Covid vaccine.
Hemophilia is a very serious and I think incurable condition and I believe it is almost automatically classified as permanently disabling.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/n...m_source=email

___________________

New study: A simple nasal wash reduces the risk of being hospitalized for COVID by >8X

But don't worry. Nobody will find out. However, it does show that the entire pandemic response was unnecessary and harmful. I just wanted to make sure you knew that.
Steve Kirsch
49 min ago
Executive Summary

A simple nasal wash with a saline solution performed within 24 hours of symptoms done twice daily for 14 days can reduce the risk of being hospitalized for COVID by 8X.

This is much better than Paxlovid (only a 2.5X reduction if you believe the trial data).

This is much better than any COVID vaccine performs in practice and it’s much safer too.

Implications:

The entire pandemic response was completely unnecessary

This treatment is still being ignored by every mainstream medical institution

Universities should mandate students do nasal washes after getting COVID instead of taking vaccines.

Introduction

The article.

The paper: Rapid initiation of nasal saline irrigation to reduce severity in high-risk COVID+ outpatients
Summary

All the pandemic mitigations were unnecessary.

Simply telling newly infected people to rinse their nose with a saline rinse if they got sick would have reduced the hospitalization rates to levels comparable to the flu.

The CDC is still not telling people to do this today even though there is no risk to anyone.
Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Thousands of paid subscribers

I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy, corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is being misled by formerly trusted authorities.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...bvPwFtNKdw--~D

Jeff Childers

Excerpt:

Phase 3 Drug Trials Pfizer's new mNRA flu shot.



C&C NEWS ☙ Thursday, October 6, 2022




�� Monday, BusinessWire ran a story headlined, “Pfizer Initiates Phase 3 Study of mRNA-Based Influenza Vaccine.” The U.S. study includes 25,000 adult victims, sorry, I mean ‘volunteers,’ who received their experimental doses this week to “evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity” of the company’s new mRNA flu shot.



You have to hand it to them. They aren’t quitters.

Sometimes you learn more about a topic by what is left out. The BusinessWire article says exactly nothing about how the mRNA shots work. I assume that, like the failed covid shots, the flu shots deliver an mRNA payload to trillions of cells, forcing them all to produce massive amounts of foreign flu virus protein, probably based on a strain prediction made by Pfizer employees. A flu virus strain that recipients might not have even encountered, absent the shot.



"But flu virus doesn’t have spikes. Which part of the flu virus will the mRNA shots force the body to make? The article doesn’t say what part."

But don’t worry! I’ll bet you a real beefsteak dinner that the U.S. government will buy tons of Pfizer’s new flu shots, which, like the covid shots and other vaccines, enjoy broad legal liability protection.

My old economics professor used to say, if you see a distortion in the market, look for the withered hand of government. GOVERNMENT created this runaway market for vaccines with its laws eliminating manufacturer liability. By locking in liability protection, pharma companies can now sell drugs to HEALTHY PEOPLE — the largest market there is. And the government will use taxpayer dollars to help sell those products to the taxpayers.

Actually, government itself can now be the biggest consumer of those products even if taxpayers don’t want them. And, what a market.

A vaccine for flu! Get out of here! It’s the biggest market ever! Every single healthy person “needs” it EVERY SINGLE YEAR OF THEIR LIVES. And the best part is, if it hurts or even kills customers, they can’t sue you! It’s even better than a gold mine, because a gold mine eventually runs out of precious metal.

Before you start typing angry comments, I am not opposed to the development of new technologies to protect AT RISK people from the flu. I am opposed to total liability protection. I am opposed to drugging healthy people. And I am opposed to secrecy. Secrecy plus liability protection is a bad combination. At minimum, to get liability protection, pharma should have to disclose EVERYTHING. They should be subject to public records laws.

Or, we could just fully or partially end the vaccine liability protection gravy train. That would be a good start. Something to think about.

________________
Dachsie comment and another mini-rant.

BigPharma + BigGovernment = Deep State

I remember Dr. Russell Blaylock, retired neuro surgeon, say many years ago on a radio program of Dr. Stan Monteith the following.
The annual "flu vaccine" has never been effective because it is always based on last year's strain of flu that was active on the populace. They have to have several months lead time to formulate and manufacture and distribute the flu vaccine in time for the beginning of the next year's Fall flu season, and that necessitates using the last'year's flu strain that was active last Fall. Every Fall there is a brand new strain or strains of flu that is active on the populace, so as I understand it we will never have an effective flu vaccine.

However the flu vaccine has made some people have to be hospitalized because of neurological damage and left some people critically ill and permanently (lung) paralyzed, like one of my co-workers at a large state university teaching hospital.

Almost every person I know who got the flu shot say they felt very sick for several days after that shot and they will never ever take it again.

Quite a few people have permanent paralysis in one leg and have to walk with a cane the rest of their lives, like our county judge and quite a few medical students and doctors in training. And all these flu vax'd people could catch the flu again next year anyway even though they are said to be "immunized."

Flu vaccines have a miserable reputation so far and now they are going to mix in the cursed mRNA technology to reduce and destroy the health of the populace on a permanent recurring basis.

A vaccine first has to enter the cells and then start working providing immunity and then continue working for a long time.

But the new flu vaccine is supposed to be able to set off some kind of manufacturing process whereby something is made to enter the cells and set off continual immunity process to that particular kind of influenza virus.

We do not know how the new mRNA flu vaccine is supposed to work and perform those two functions. They ain't sayin' and they don't have to. (It is all liability-shielded, experimental and so far not fully licensed and not approved by the FDA.)

Garbage in, Garbage out !

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email

News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller

Pigs are flying! With Pfizer, BlackRock in BIG TROUBLE, Fauci now acting CONTRITE ("No one's perfect"), and Gates insists he did NOT "mastermind some evil plot"


When Pfizer goes, can they be far behind? Those murderers will go down with it—as will the CDC, and FDA, and WHO, and governments worldwide (at every level), AND (please, God) "our free press"

October 6, 2022

SNIP Go to original to see embedded video of Gates and full posting.

RFK, Jr.'s book about Fauci has been made into a movie. Mark your calendar for Tuesday October 18, 2022 to see the free screening.

Dear Dachsie,

I wrote “The Real Anthony Fauci” so that Americans — both Democrat and Republican — can understand Dr. Fauci’s pernicious role in allowing pharmaceutical companies to dictate a COVID-19 response that trampled public health, the global economy, our constitutional rights and all the traditional values of liberalism.

Despite the suppression of media coverage, the book became a bestseller.

Selling over 1,000,000 copies since the release in November 2021.
Spending 17 weeks on the New York Times Best Sellers list.
Soaring to #1 on Amazon, over three months.
Appearing on Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Publisher’s Weekly bestseller lists.

Instead of fostering transparency and respectful debate, and implementing the traditional, well-established public health strategies for countering pandemics, Dr. Fauci promoted a militarized and monetized response including draconian lockdowns, business closures, coercive vaccination with experimental jabs, and a litany of totalitarian controls that transformed our country into a surveillance state and racked up the world's highest COVID-19 body count.

He then worked with Big Pharma, media and social media titans, and Pentagon and intelligence agencies to vilify and marginalize dissent, punish every attempt at questioning, and to gaslight skeptics. Government worked with media and social media titans to ban books, silence physicians and scientists, and condemn artists, writers, poets, and intellectuals who questioned the unscientific orthodoxies of the medical and biosecurity cartels.

CHD has partnered with our friends at Revealed Films to transform my book into a compelling documentary that exposes the corrupt reign of the “nation’s most trusted doctor,” Dr. Fauci and his accomplices in a coup d'etat that almost developed.

The documentary will stream for FREE on October 18, 2022.

We need your support to be able to conquer the censorship and ensure that millions of people are able to view the film. Together we can get the truth to the masses and reveal the story of “The Real Anthony Fauci.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...5434b10efd.jpg

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...1-9dc7b271dd4e

childrenshealthdefense.org

Is the U.S. Blood Supply Tainted?

Despite reports that COVID-19 vaccines cause blood abnormalities, the American Red Cross and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration continue to brush off concerns that the massive vaccine campaign may have contaminated the country’s blood supply.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...re-800x417.jpg

By
Children's Health Defense Team

By Children's Health Defense Team
10-13 minutes
________________________________________
Despite reports that COVID-19 vaccines cause blood abnormalities, the American Red Cross and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration continue to brush off concerns that the massive vaccine campaign may have contaminated the country’s blood supply.
Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender's Top News of the Day. It's free.
After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of COVID-19 vaccines, blood clots were some of the earliest adverse events observed, and abnormal coagulation continues to be one of the most frequent and serious problems reported.
As of mid-September, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — notorious for capturing only a minuscule proportion of adverse events — had received notification of more than 43,000 blood clotting disorders, including acute-onset problems in young children.
Clotting disorders make the blood clot “too easily,” generating clots that can travel through the bloodstream and increase the risk of heart attacks and strokes, among other potential complications.
Funeral directors and embalmers in the U.S. and U.K. have gone public with shocking descriptions of highly unusual blood clots in up to 85% of the bodies coming under their care — a “massive increase” compared to pre-COVID-19 vaccine times when ordinary-looking clots might be found in 5% to 10% of the deceased.
“In all my years of embalming, we would run across clots from time to time,” said Richard Hirschman, an experienced funeral director in Alabama, “but since May last year [2021], something about the blood has changed. It’s not normal. It’s drastic.”
The rampant clotting and the clots’ disturbing sci-fi appearance — “long fibrous entities that can completely block a vein or artery,” which Hirschman likens to calamari, rubber bands, spaghetti, worms or parasites — are just some of the concerns prompting questions about blood supply safety.
No ‘safety risks?’
About 55% of blood is plasma — which, among other functions, supplies proteins “for blood clotting and immunity” — with the remaining 45% consisting of red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets suspended in the plasma.
Depending on their blood type, individuals who give blood can choose to donate whole blood, plasma or platelets, or they can make a “Power Red” donation (a “concentrated dose” of red blood cells).
The American Red Cross says it will not accept blood from someone whose blood “does not clot normally,” but — following guidance from the same branch of the FDA that oversees vaccines — welcomes immediate donations from anyone who received one of the mRNA or other COVID-19 vaccines available in the U.S., as long as the person says he is “symptom-free and feeling well.”
The Red Cross claims to be independent but openly celebrates its “special relationship” with the federal government — a relationship that includes periodic appropriations and contracts.
In a recent tweet directed at potential blood transfusion recipients, the Red Cross clarified:
The tweet generated numerous responses from the public accusing the Red Cross of disseminating “misinformation” and directing the organization’s attention to peer-reviewed publications contradicting its languid attitude.
In one of the most alarming studies, published in August in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, Italian surgeons described atypical clumping of red blood cells and the presence of “extraordinarily anomalous structures and substances” of “various shapes and sizes of unclear origin” in over 94% of symptomatic, COVID-19-vaccinated individuals whose blood they examined.
The 1,006 study participants, ranging in age from 15 to 85, received a first (14%), second (45%) or third (41%) dose of a Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccine about a month before the analysis of their blood.
Pointing to other studies that found foreign materials in the blood of COVID-19 vaccine recipients and in COVID-19 vaccine vials — materials “that the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and the many promoters of the experimental injections claimed were not in them at all” — the Italian authors concluded the vaccine-induced blood alterations were “likely … to be involved in producing the coagulation disorders commonly reported after anti-COVID injections.”
Putting the matter even more plainly, they stated:
“[S]uch abrupt changes as we have documented in the peripheral blood profile of 948 patients have never been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition … from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one … is unprecedented. …
“In our collective experience, and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow especially at the level of the capillaries.”
Another study by Romanian researchers, sent to the Red Cross by the tweeting public, not only reported that Pfizer’s “vaccine-associated synthetic mRNA persists in systemic circulation for at least 2 weeks” but also noted, “extended plasma clearance times compared to estimates presented by mRNA vaccine manufacturers.”
Meanwhile, a case report from Germany presenting autopsy results for a man who died after receiving three “gene-based” COVID-19 vaccine doses (one AstraZeneca, two Pfizer) over a seven-month period conclusively revealed the presence of COVID-19 vaccine spike protein in both brain and heart — and particularly in small blood vessel cells.
These and other studies may be why members of the public like “Mary” incredulously tweeted back to the Red Cross, “Are you kidding? There is proof it enters other body cells like the heart, causing myocarditis; how do you think it gets to the heart from the injection site???”
The FDA has refused to release autopsy results in its possession for people who died following COVID-19 vaccination.
Out, damned clot
As early as May 2021, vaccine researchers were disclosing the “unexpected” entry into the bloodstream of the vaccines’ synthetic spike protein, while other pharmaceutical industry consultants admitted, “Some of the vaccine dose is going to make it into the bloodstream, of course.”
Around the same time, figures like Canadian physician Dr. Charles Hoffe were warning that technologies like CT scans and MRIs, which can identify large blood clots, would not find the “microscopic” clots affecting many of the COVID-19-vaccinated, who might “have no idea they are even having these microscopic blood clots.”
Hoffe was able to ascertain the widespread presence of micro-blood clots in his mRNA-vaccinated patient population using D-dimer tests that look for protein fragments associated with clots.
The Canadian doctor also cautioned that when blood clots damage the brain, spinal cord, heart or lungs, “those tissues … are permanently damaged.”
A year after these admissions, in May 2022, the FDA finally acknowledged the risk of “potentially life-threatening blood clots” in recipients of the Janssen/Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID-19 vaccine.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued similar advisories about AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine.
Other countries such as India and Denmark admitted to blood clot risks while trying to blame them on “faulty injection technique.”
Neither the FDA nor the EMA said a word about the clotting risks of the more widely used Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 shots, even though nearly 7 in 10 (69%) of the clotting disorders reported to VAERS as of mid-September were attributed to Pfizer’s shot, with another 22% linked to Moderna’s and only 9% to the J&J jab.
Although no VAERS reports thus far blame blood clots on the more recently authorized Novavax vaccine, the far-from-traditional nanoparticle concoction not only delivers premade spike proteins — “consistently shown to create clotting issues” — but also residual insect and viral proteins and DNA contaminants.
Large risks from nanoparticles?
Nanoparticle technology is a prominent feature of the two mRNA injections and the Novavax vaccine, and biodistribution of the injected nanoparticles has been a growing cause for concern.
Well before COVID-19, mainstream news outlets alerted the public to nanoparticles’ tendency to “get into the bloodstream and accumulate elsewhere in the body” following oral ingestion — with “unintended effects on cells and organs” — and described how inhaled nanoparticles “work their way through the lungs and into the bloodstream where they can raise the risk of heart attack and stroke.”
On a website for laypeople, the European Commission discloses that nanoparticles “will move with the circulation into all the organs and tissues of the body,” also noting animal model evidence showing “that very small nanoparticles can transfer from a pregnant rat to the fetus.”
In their analysis of vaccinated individuals’ blood, the Italian authors quoted earlier noted their suspicion that some of the foreign materials they detected are “graphene-family particles,” materials that “have been intensively studied by researchers for decades and increasingly so since COVID-19.”
A comprehensive and hardly reassuring 2016 study in Particle and Fibre Toxicology described “toxic side effects” of graphene-family nanomaterials in many biological applications, reporting that they “can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc.”
That study also noted that long-term toxicity data are lacking.
Many unanswered questions
Recently, a Washington State couple, Cornelia Hertzler and Ron Bly came forward to tell the tragic story of their hospitalized infant son’s death-by-blood-clot last February.
The death occurred two weeks after the hospital administered an unauthorized blood transfusion to the baby, despite claims that, “Patients are free to refuse transfusions for any reason.”
According to the parents, who had clearly articulated their wish to use blood from directed blood donors, the hospital pooh-poohed their concerns and used “random blood” instead.
The infant’s eventually fatal blood clot became evident the very next day, with the clot, by his mother’s account, getting “worse and worse and slowly … inching closer to his heart.”
Although there is no way to know the COVID-19 vaccination status of those who donated the blood used in the baby’s transfusion, the fact that “most of the nation’s blood supply is now coming from donors who have been inoculated [against COVID-19]” raises many questions.
Existing blood banks may prefer to dismiss those questions as the fevered imaginings of “COVID skeptics” — arguing that requests for blood from unvaccinated donors “would be an operational can of worms for a medically unjustifiable request” — but farsighted entrepreneurs interested in providing such a service might not have to worry about battling for clients.

_________________

Dachsie comment:

I would hope that there would be a reliable blood test to determine if someone has been vaccinated with a anti-covid vaccine. Of course, that would be a test and testing program administration that would have to be high quality and accurate and up to date. Again, even this ultimately depends on honesty and diligence at every level. That would be a stark departure from the way the entire pandemic response has been administered.

Certainly just taking someone's word that they were vaccinated is not good enough, and relying on some government database that is derived from word-of-mouth answer to vaccination status is also a non-starter.

https://yt3.ggpht.com/df6GLX3dzX0PaS...BUA=s640-nd-v1

https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxP5S...eErVsT3L-S11F_

Judicial Watch
October 6, 2022
NEW: Amid the rampant fraud and corruption in the government’s massive COVID-19 relief cash giveaway, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees have been charged with stealing over a million dollars from pandemic relief programs to buy luxury goods, fancy cars, and travel. READ: http://jwatch.us/c7TU3s

https://www.judicialwatch.org/fraud-...d-relief-cash/

October 06, 2022 | Judicial Watch

More Fraud in COVID Relief Cash Giveaway; IRS Workers Steal $1 Mil to Buy Cars, Jewelry

Amid the rampant fraud and corruption in the government’s massive COVID-19 relief cash giveaway, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees have been charged with stealing over a million dollars from pandemic relief programs to buy luxury goods, fancy cars, and travel. Five current or former employees from the feared tax agency easily withdrew the money by filing several false loan applications with two of the federal stimulus programs— Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL)—launched under the monstrous Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, passed by Congress to provide over $2 trillion in “fast and direct economic aid” to Americans negatively impacted by the pandemic.

Not surprisingly, CARES is rife with fraud and corruption and the IRS employee scandal is simply the latest of countless examples. How bad is the problem? Last year the Department of Justice (DOJ) created a COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force to “enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud.” The special unit has been quite busy prosecuting scams, false statements, and money laundering related to the multi trillion-dollar CARES Act. So far, criminal charges have been filed against more than 1,000 defendants and the loss of public funds exceeds $1.1 billion, according to the DOJ. Of those cases, the task force has prosecuted more than 150 offenders and seized over $75 million derived from fraudulently obtained PPP funds as well as numerous real estate properties and luxury items purchased with the illegally obtained money.

The sting is even greater when presumably trusted employees who work for American taxpayers commit the fraud as is the case with the IRS defendants. The scheme involves five current and former employees of the tax agency in Tennessee and Mississippi. Federal authorities say they used the illegally obtained pandemic relief funds to buy expensive designer clothes (Gucci), a fancy imported car (Mercedes-Benz), jewelry, trips to Las Vegas, manicures, and massages. The leftover cash was deposited into personal investment accounts. Each of the defendants submitted multiple fraudulent applications seeking at least tens of thousands of dollars in relief funds. An IRS Program Evaluation and Risk analyst submitted four fraudulent applications seeking more than half a million dollars. Another who worked as a program assistant in the agency’s information technology department, also submitted multiple applications seeking $338,900 on behalf of a fake fashion business. “These individuals – acting out of pure greed – abused their positions by taking government funds meant for citizens and businesses who desperately needed it,” said U.S. Attorney Kevin G. Ritz for the Western District of Tennessee.

This case is only a snippet of the widespread problem with the government’s insane pandemic cash handout. Just a few days ago, a federal audit revealed that billions of dollars in expanded COVID-19 unemployment insurance benefits funded under CARES have been stolen by fraudsters. The programs are known as Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA), Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC), and Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC) and they have doled out an eye popping $663.8 billion in pandemic-related unemployment benefits as of April 23, 2022. An investigation by the Department of Labor (DOL) Inspector General found that around $45.6 billion was paid to applicants who did not qualify, a huge increase over last year’s $16 billion in fraudulent payments. Criminals used the Social Security numbers of the deceased or other illegal ploys to obtain the money, according to the audit which focused on four states. One of the states scrutinized by investigators improperly paid out $30.4 billion of its total $71.7 billion in unemployment benefits. “We estimated $9.9 billion of that was paid to likely fraudsters (13.8 percent),” the report states, adding that in the four states analyzed, one in five dollars initially paid in PUA benefits likely went to fraudsters. Yet the cash keeps flowing.