Coronavirus

News of Integrity and Product Safety and Efficacy and Transparency - Pfizer Biontech Style

__________________________

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFOYYpATrBw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFOYYpATrBw

Update to Investigation into the Leaked EMA Emails showing Pfizer Clinical Trial Concerns

20:32 video runtime

Oct 6, 2022

TrialSite News

Join The Conversation! | https://trialsitenews.com/
In June, Trial Site News published a bombshell investigative report on the leaked European Medicine Agency (EMA) emails and other Pfizer-related confidential reports, which exposed concerning facts in the run-up to the authorization of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

https://www.americaoutloud.com/dr-ro...edom-fighters/

Dr. Robert Malone Attacks and Maligns Leading Freedom Fighters - America Out Loud
America's
October 6, 2022 listen to audio reading of this article

Peter Breggin MD & Ginger Breggin

Peter Breggin MD and Ginger Ross Breggin have been married and working together for almost 40 years. Peter is known as "The Conscience of Psychiatry" for his many decades of successful reform work in mental health.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Since he first became involved in the health freedom movement related to COVID-19, I have observed firsthand how Robert W. Malone, MD, has been attacking leaders of the movement in person, in the media, and on his substack. He has made legal threats, and recently his lawyer has sent very threatening formal Demand Letters to at least two health freedom leaders to stop their alleged defamations and to pay him money.1 The Demand Letters will be released later.

Dr. Malone Attacks Physician Scientists Drs. Harvey Risch and Peter A McCullough

Dr. Malone’s attacks on the health freedom leadership massively heated up on May 3, 2022, in his substack titled Power and Strategy of False Narratives (substack.com).2 Dr. Malone angrily tried to discredit and ridicule Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, and Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D. It is no exaggeration to say that these two men are among the most respected, honorable, and important physicians and scientists in the world today. Many consider them the medical leaders of the health freedom movement. Their credentials and their scientific publications are stunning.

Dr. McCullough is a dear friend and a hero to us. I frequently describe him on the air as the most important and most courageous scientist in the health freedom movement and even in the entire worldwide medical community at this critical time in history. McCullough has endured significant hardships that less courageous and less ethical physicians and scientists have avoided by not speaking out. For Malone to add to Dr. McCullough’s burdens, or even to distract him in any way, is a tragic betrayal of a man who initially welcomed him into the movement.

We do not know Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D., as well as Dr. McCullough, but I have had the honor to formally interview Dr. Risch and talk with him privately. He shares with Dr. McCullough a genuineness and a gentleness that is uncommon in very successful physicians and academics. Like nearly everyone in the health freedom movement, we have followed his amazingly insightful and accurate analyses of COVID-19. Dr. Risch is one of the most dignified, honorable, brave, and effective physicians and scientists that most of us have ever known. And like Dr. McCullough, he is an outstanding worldwide health freedom movement leader and an individual who cordially tries to avoid professional conflicts.

Malone’s Excuse for Attacking Drs. McCullough and Risch

Malone generally attacks people whom he sees as in professional competition with him or who have criticized him, especially about his concept of “mass psychosis.” Along with many others, we have been concerned that his personally invented diagnosis of “mass psychosis” will be “weaponized” and used to psychiatrically attack those who reject the establishment narrative about its intentions. We are also concerned that Malone’s rejection of research confirming well-established conspiracies among the wealthiest and most powerful elite and institutions will prevent victims of oppression from identifying and dealing with their oppressors. Overall, many are concerned that the concept “mass psychosis” will blunt the health freedom and the overall freedom movement by blaming “totalitarianism” on the victims rather than on enemies we can identify and defeat.3

Despite the importance of the above controversies and criticisms of Malone, Malone’s attacks on his critics are usually on them personally while ignoring the issues. Here are Malone’s expressed reasons for attacking Drs. McCullough and Risch:

“On a related note, I learned last night that Drs. Peter McCullough and Harvey Risch have joined a company that is promoting overpriced vitamins, nutraceuticals, and telemedicine. The Wellness Company. This firm is headed up by a physician formerly with the Global Covid Summit group, and is now quite antagonistic to us. This firm is controlled by Mr. Foster Colson, head of the Colson group…”

Malone probably learned about the new company because Drs. McCullough and Risch were on journalist Christine Dolan’s show, the night of October 2, 2022, openly discussing their project.4

The Wellness Company is based partly on the now-deceased physician Zev Zelenko, his ideas, and his proven supplements: “This was one of Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s final projects, and something that he strongly believed was necessary to revolutionize the entire landscape of healthcare.” Mission Statement– The Wellness Company (twc.health)

Zev Zelenko, MD, was one of the bravest, most resourceful, and most pioneering members of all the heroes of the freedom movement. He also made among the greatest personal, professional, and financial sacrifices. Along with Dr. McCullough, he was another dear friend of ours—like family to us—and he helped me to reach closer to God.

It is distressing that Malone is now attacking not only a source of income for Drs. McCullough and Risch, but also for Zev Zelenko’s large, bereaved family. The Wellness Company is also a source of valuable, trustworthy services for a public in great need of them.

What also rankles is that Malone’s Deep State connections, which enabled him to gather 10 billion dollars in grants in one five-year period, have almost certainly made him a multi-millionaire.5 Despite his wealth, which in some people produces humility and a desire to help, Malone wants to malign two men who continue to give so much to the freedom health movement and hamper their efforts to participate in an honorable and highly ethical business.

The third Wellness Company member he ridicules, Foster Colson, is a wealthy entrepreneur. He is the Founder and CEO of the company, and the quality of his organization speaks to a substantial investment.

Why is Malone attacking these two men? I suspect it’s because, whatever they thought in the past, they no longer support Malone’s dangerous ideology.

Malone’s History of Attacking Competitors and Critics

In addition to Malone’s recent attacks on Drs. McCullough and Risch, and in addition to attacking me, he has also attacked courageous journalists Stew Peters and pioneering researcher Dr. Jane Ruby, both leaders in the health freedom movement.6 He has also recently attacked Clay Clark,7 developer of the amazing Reawaken America tour. All three have hosted critics of Dr. Malone’s concept of mass psychosis on their shows or venues, and Stew Peters and Jane Ruby have themselves been critical of Malone’s ideology.

According to my recent conversations with Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. and her closest supporters, Malone has attacked the virology researcher. Dr. Mikovits is one the most revered, good-natured, and gentle people in the health freedom movement and star of the documentary film Plandemic, which more than one billion people have seen. She, too has been critical of Malone’s concepts.

Malone has called my relationships with Stew Peters, Dr. Jane Ruby, and Judy Mikovits a conspiracy to attack him. In reality, Dr. Mikovits, who helped orient me to the field of virology in relation to COVID-19, is a longstanding friend; but until Malone recently attacked Judy, we never discussed him. Stew and Dr. Ruby each knew me casually from a few media interviews but never had any serious off-camera discussions until Malone recently attacked the three of us on the same radio show.

Except for Malone’s attack on Drs. Risch and McCullough, I have not discussed the details of his verbal assaults on people. I have cited the sources, but I will not repeat such outlandish slurs.

Malone has also attacked Alex Berenson, hinting that Berenson has a mental disorder, which I will not name.8 It is against the AMA regulations for a physician to diagnose a public figure that the doctor has not evaluated.9 It is even worse for a physician to do it to gain an advantage over the other person in a conflict. Berenson is another leader in the health freedom movement, a former New York Times science writer, and probably the first and most effective mainstream journalist to dare to criticize the prevailing COVID-19 narrative.

At this point, it appears that Dr. Malone is trying to bully the leadership of the movement into stopping any criticism of his ideology.

A Great Journalist—Writer—Historian Was Among the First to Suspect Malone

Malone’s escalating attacks on leaders of the health freedom movement, and the disruption he is causing, are consistent with the early observations and predictions by journalist and researcher Diana West. Diana is the author of American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character (2013), a book that digs deeply into the infiltration of the Roosevelt administration and the West by Communists during World War II and thereafter. It is one of the most important books I have ever read and years ago helped prepare me to research and write COVID-19 and the Global Predators (2021) with my wife, Ginger.

I’m not at all suggesting, and I do not believe that Malone is a Communist. But Malone himself has admitted that many people have feared that his true allegiance is with the establishment, making him “controlled opposition” planted in the group but serving the establishment. Malone occasionally brings up this accusation, and he has tried to defend himself against it.10

On January 28, 2022, Diana published what is still the most ominous and thorough analysis of Malone’s Deep State background and his activities within the health freedom group. She published her report on January 28, 2022, at a time when she and I had lost touch with each other, and we were not aware we were both examining Dr. Malone’s work. She titled her detailed essay “Dr. Robert Malone: A Risk Analysis,” which should be read by all concerned.11 Here is one sequence of her observations:

Did Robert Malone, Mr. mRNA himself, come out and warn the American public against the hasty, unsafe coronavirus mRNA “vaccine”? No. I guess he abandoned his own risk assessment, because he also says he got “jabbed” himself early on and “almost died” of his second Moderna shot.

Did he warn the public about that? No.

I would like to know why not. Listening to that same fall 2021 Malone-Peters interview, I wondered if the reason might be because he did not want to interrupt a sequence of planned events.

Listen to Malone describe what many of us call the “plandemic:”

“Where I’m at now is what we’re observing is a scripted response that has been pioneered in multiple war games by a small cadre of individuals, largely at Johns Hopkins University, largely funded by Bill and Melinda Gates and the World Economic Forum – that’s all true — involving multiple government officials. And as the war games become more sophisticated — and I’ve participated in some of these, too. However, not the Hopkins‘ one, and that’s, that’s why the strategy that Peter [Navarro] and I have advocated (of course, we were labeled right-wing kooks) in the Washington Times is still a very balanced approach: jab the elders and the ones at high risk.”

That’s some pretty jaw-dropping information flowing there, at least right up to a sentence-ending non-sequiturs about his balanced approach to the “jab.”

Diana concludes:

My own “risk assessment”?

Something tells me “the current data” is sure to change, Robert Malone should not be at the helm, and I don’t want to let time go by before mentioning it. [Emphases added]

Malone’s Documented History of Threatening People Who Criticize or Seemingly Compete with Him for Attention

Malone has been attacking and intimidating people who are not even in the freedom movement but who threaten him in some way.

The February 19, 2022, issue of The Scientist summarizes one encounter:12

Malone has also pursued people who have disagreed with him or have not given him what he says is due credit. In mid-2021, biochemist and mRNA-vaccine co-developer Katalin Karikó, who has been featured in multiple news stories about the vaccines, told The Atlantic,13 that Malone had emailed her to accuse her of inflating her accomplishments. “This is not going to end well,” he told her in the email. Malone told the Atlantic that the message was not intended as a threat. [emphases added]

Would you feel threatened if someone who was in angry conflict with you warned you in writing, “This is not going to end well”?

I am not trying to make a personal attack on Malone but to document that he—and not this writer—has been the attacker, not only against me, but against many people in our movement.

We are not motivated by personal animosity. Both my wife Ginger and I have spent many decades standing up for freedom, sometimes at grave risk to ourselves, and we would have burned out if we harbored anger and resentment. I have given more time to my volunteer reform work than to any other single aspect of my life since I began volunteering in a state mental hospital as a Harvard student in 1954.14 And, of course, he only attacked me earlier because my background as a psychiatrist and historian of psychiatry prepared me to see the dangers in his pushing his concept of “mass psychosis” on the world.

Many people are now aware of the dangers in Malone’s concept of “mass psychosis” but did not speak out until we criticized Desmet’s book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, which provided some of the intellectual basis for Malone’s concept of “mass psychosis.” As we document in this report, even Mattias Desmet is critical of Malone’s use of “mass psychosis” (see below).

Desmet’s Reluctance About Malone’s Invented Concept of Mass Psychosis

We have strong evidence that Dr. Malone did invent “mass psychosis”—or at least is promoting it on someone else’s behalf—but Malone has become increasingly adamant, including currently,15 saying that Desmet and other people invented it. Is he turning on his partner Desmet, and if so, why?

At least two videos in 2022 show conversations between Malone and Desmet, which confirm Malone’s authorship of the concept of “mass psychosis.” In the videos, Desmet tries to distance himself from it by citing “ethical” and other differences in meaning from what Malone is trying to say with the word “psychosis.” This is from a European documentary about Desmet and Malone:16

Headwind 2 – The Round Table

Desmet: And then Robert mentioned me at the Joe Rogan’s [famous podcast], and he added the term to the term mass formation. And that was very successful, I think. It made me famous around the world.

[laughter]

Malone: Or infamous—

Desmet: Or infamous, yes.

Desmet: [to Malone] I doubt it a little bit–

Interviewer: The term, the term that he added was? [over laughter] The term that he added was?

Desmet: Psychosis. Psychosis. So, I always use the term mass formation. Just referring actually–simply to the formation of a mass or a crowd in a society and then Robert added the term psychosis to it. Which made it a little more sensational, I think.

Interviewer: [interrupts and laughs] Edgy—

Desmet: And made it spread around the world, but of course, at the same time, it may be added, well, from an ethical, pragmatic, and intellectual point of view ah it makes the term have a different meaning or a different connotation it depends a little bit. But it was a—a very good move to make the theory famous around the world, yeah?

The mood is light-hearted, with frequent and often self-conscious laughs. Both men seem to agree that the fame more than justifies using the term “mass psychosis” despite Desmet’s “ethical, pragmatic and intellectual” concerns.

Here are Desmet and Malone again in a separate video on January 4, 2022:17

Malone: Ah, that’s my summary of my understanding of his [Desmet’s] teaching. Now please, fix me fix what I got wrong.

Desmet: Ah I agree with pretty much everything you said, Robert. I would underline a few small differences such as the fact—and add some things, of course, here and there. For instance, I didn’t use the term mass formation psychosis. I prefer the term mass formation because in my opinion as a psychologist, a clinical psychologist you have to be very careful with using diagnostic terms because they can easily have a stigmatizing meaning and [Malone vigorously holds his hands up as if to say “stop”] they are both an-an unethical—an unethical—from an ethical and also from a pragmatic perspective can they be a little counterproductive, I think. Um, but a—

Malone: If can interduct [sic] to your point I just had that discussion with Brett Weinstein half an hour ago and he made exactly the same comment is that is that the term psychosis is inherently creating a barrier to ah comprehension and acceptance of the theory by those that might be ah threatened by the use of that term for exactly what you’re saying. So thank you for that reprimanding correction–

In these videos, it is taken for granted that Malone invented the concept and then promoted it, but that Desmet has serious concerns about it. Perhaps Malone is trying to deflect the severe criticism of his using the concept, but he shows no signs of retracting it. This is confusing, of course, but what really matters is that Malone by himself is responsible for getting world attention with the clever but dangerous phrase, “mass psychosis.”

Compared to who is pushing it now, it is not nearly as important to know who invented the term “mass psychosis” or who used it first. What matters now is Dr. Malone has been using his medical authority to make the concept famous and is pushing it with all his might in the face, as he admits, of criticism from many people, including Desmet.

Malone’s Friend Calls on Him to Let Go Of “Mass Psychosis”

In the same recent substack, Malone attacked his own “trusted colleague and supporter,” who suggested that Malone give up the concept of mass psychosis because so many people are concerned about it and urged trying to find common ground. Here is Malone’s excerpt from the message from his close unnamed associate:18

“The addition of psychosis to that phrase has caused psychiatrist[s] like Breggin to protect against what they fear is the “weaponization of psychiatry.” I know Mattias (and I assume you) is against the use of the word, but it needs to be made very clear out there. Apparently, in the documentary that featured the both of you, there was something said in jest about the use of “psychosis.” I’ve not seen this moment, but from what I’ve heard, the way this was expressed, with laughter, has raised concerns that it was an intentional ploy to gain attention. Does Mattias say something to the effect of, “it made me famous?” That’s was [sic] one persons interpretation, which might be totally off. I don’t know.”

After quoting this and other advice from his friend, Malone expresses his hurt and anger, and seemingly tries to make his colleague feel guilty for adding to Malone’s suffering (which is a repeated theme in his substacks):

“Well, there it is. The false narrative being promoted by detractors has come back at me stated as truth from a supporter, who (with the best of intent) is offering to mediate a resolution to a bunch of lies. And having read it while on the stage, getting ready to speak, I decided to respond. That was probably the wrong decision, but this text message was like a mind worm—once infected, my mind could not let it rest.” (bold in original)

Malone quotes his unnamed “trusted colleague and supporter” at such length, it was easy for me to identify him. He, too is very important to the health freedom movement and, like others, we have described as under Malone’s attack, is a very gentle soul who was taking an uncharacteristic risk by making suggestions to his friend Malone about his conduct.

A Final Question

Finally, we must ask, “Why would Robert Malone—who has shown no prior interest in the psychological basis of politics, or in either psychology or politics for that matter—seem to invent and then insist on publicizing such an extreme and even bizarre concept? Why would he do so, even to the point of unethically attacking others who are critical of it? How has this concept become so central to his identity, purposes, or goals?

It seems unlikely he is promoting and so vigorously defending mass psychosis out of his own self-interest or personal commitment. As far as we can ascertain, this kind of subject is not a part of his lifestyle or history, and, as documented in this report, he even denies what seems to be his admitted authorship of it.

But as a psychiatrist with decades of expertise in the arena of politicizing and weaponizing psychiatry, I am deeply concerned that the diagnosis of mass psychosis is ideal for weaponizing psychiatry for the diagnosis of dissenters for mass incarceration and abuse. Many of us in the U.S. and Europe suspect that the origin of “mass psychosis” is from within the establishment enemies of individual and political freedom—from the same government and industry connections which Malone himself has thoroughly documented and even boasted about in his resumes and elsewhere.19

It is becoming more apparent that Malone’s agenda goes beyond supporting the dangerous concept of “mass psychosis.” It now appears that he is trying, one by one, to take down the leadership of the health freedom movement. This would fit with the suspicions that others, like Diana West, have had about him—that he is here precisely to undermine the health freedom movement. If so, he is now zeroing in on the goal by attacking the leaders, hoping to demoralize and divide them.

1 “A demand letter is a formal notice sent to request assets, money, or legal action from another person as a last attempt to solve an issue without going to court.” https://www.thedemandletters.com/ I have read one letter.
2 Power and Strategy of False Narratives (substack.com). See the third from last paragraph.
3 For our publications and other resources on Desmet and Malone, go to our special section on our website (www.breggin.com) at https://breggin.com/Threats-from-the...Mass-Psychosis. Unless he’s somehow lost all his money, he is a multi-millionaire based on working for the drug companies and the Deep State, which are crushing America and which the freedom movements are fighting.
4 LIVESTREAM REPLAY: The Globalists In Plain Sight! 10/2/22 – CD Media (creativedestructionmedia.com)
5 Breggin.com | Threats from Mass Formations and Mass Psychosis Entry No. 8 on the page.
6 Two of the recent attacks on many leaders, including Peters and Ruby are (1) Malone’s substack https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/po...lse-narratives (2) his radio interview by John B. Wells. Intellectual Rape – John B Wells LIVE (rumble.com). It also aired on many radio stations: Classic Late Night Talk Radio Archives | Ark Midnight
7 I have seen the emails and talked with Clay Clark.
8 https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/we...g-stoking-rage
9 Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 8.12. https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-...-conduct-media
10 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...arrative-cola/
11 https://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/...-Analysis.aspx
12 https://www.the-scientist.com/news-o...ormation-69719
13 Robert Malone: Vaccine Scientist, Vaccine Skeptic – The Atlantic
14 Here’s are introductions to my reform work on www.breggin.com from the “About” section. My extensive resume: https://z0sqrs-a.akamaihd.net/6905_b...MD-resume.pdf; a short bio: https://breggin.com/article-detail/p...ail/brief-bio; psychiatric reform accomplishments: https://breggin.com/article-detail/p...ter-r-breggin; what people say about Dr. Breggin: https://breggin.com/article-detail/p...out-dr-breggin.
15 Power and Strategy of False Narratives (substack.com)
16 Original full feature with Mattias Desmet, Robert Malone and Geert Vanden Bossche. Headwind 2 – The Round Table on Headwind.TV. 2022 https://www.headwind.tv/headwind2epi...tvandenbossche
17 https://www.bitchute.com/video/yyQw0GsVfCl7/ January 4, 2022.
18 https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/po...lse-narratives
19 Malone’s contacts over his professional lifetime are extremely extensive with institutions unfriendly or hostile to the freedom movement, including Big Pharma, Deep State (including Fauci’s and NIAID), and Big Government (including Department of Defense funding of his personal consulting firm and publically discussed CIA contacts). He says he has been shedding these contacts and when we found his connection to NIH ACTIV (the Great Reset organized within the government), he claimed he has recently given up that one, too. Documentation of his affiliations and sources of income can be found in items 5-8 at https://breggin.com/Threats-from-the...Mass-Psychosis

___________________

Please read Dr. Desmet's side of the story.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-...tm_source=push

The Attempt to Burn Me at the Stake
The Attempt to Burn Me at the Stake

By Mattias Desmet October 7, 2022 Philosophy 18 minute read
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

Shocking Email: Feds Purposefully Made Kids Miserable During Covid Pandemic to Coerce Them Into Getting Vaxxed

An August 2021 email by the U.S. Department of Education’s Anne Hartge, of the Office of Communications and Outreach, following up on a conversation between Eric Hagarty, who is now Pennsylvania’s current Secretary of Education; Tara Piechowicz, Deputy Chief Of Staff for Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf; and Jack Groarke, Deputy Chief of Staff for Federal Affairs for Gov. Wolf, sheds an ugly spotlight on the behind-the-scenes decisionmaking that led to the current crisis in education among America’s schoolchildren.
https://beckernews.com/wp-content/up...g9M-scaled.jpg


“Not sure if you saw yesterday, but President Biden along with [Education] Secretary Cardoina in addition to calling for every school district to host a vaccine clinic, announced next week as a national Back to School Week of Action and introduced a slew of initiatives on youth vaccinations the Administration will be making including high profile trips acrosss the country…” Hartge wrote.

Then comes an absolutely brutal revelation about how the vaccine requirements were used to punish children who did not want the jabs, or whose parents did not want them to have them, and limited many children’s ability to socialize, get sunshine, and exercise.

“Public record emails show the Biden administration wanted to ‘leverage’ school sports and activities to coerce vaccination amongst students,” Megan Eileen noted. “… we have seen leveraging athletics and extracurriculars as a way to boost you vaccination as an effective tactic across the county.”


“They used the threat of students missing games due to Covid-19 exposure and long quarantines,” Eileen added.

“Your federal government purposefully made kids lives more miserable during covid by using official “guidance” to ham-handedly drive people to vaxx their kids “leveraging..extracurriculars..as an effective tactic.”

The truly appalling aspect to the U.S. Department of Education’s childhood ‘vaccination’ drive is that there is now plentiful evidence that the mRNA shots cause known side effects, particularly for young persons.

https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/...m_source=email

The Defeat Of COVID
"A fish can't see the water..."
Jennifer Margulis examines some likely motivations of those who lied to the public about the COVID vaccines.
ColleenHuberNMD
19 min ago

The following is entirely Jennifer Margulis' writing. You can subscribe to her newsletter here:

https://jennifermargulis.net/

By Jennifer Margulis

Some of us are immovable in our beliefs. Others constantly search out new information and change our minds about things.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...3f_600x427.png


Like everyone else, I have strong biases — I'm biased in favor of women being empowered to have their babies where and how they feel most comfortable (home birth anyone?!). I believe that kindness matters and that we should parent children gently and also be gentle with ourselves. And I also believe that medical doctors have an ethical responsibility to tell patients all of their options when it comes to making health decisions. And, I don’t like prejudice, misogyny, or hypocrisy.

I also strive, imperfectly, to be open-minded, and willing to listen to new information on any given subject, and to change my mind or refine my ideas based on new information

But changing a belief is very difficult. When scientists began realizing that the COVID-19 vaccines did not work to prevent COVID or stop its spread, instead of halting the vaccine program—which would have been the most scientific and healthiest choice—they changed the definition of vaccines.

You probably know this already: We’ve been lied to about masking, social distancing, and about the safety, efficacy, and necessity of mRNA vaccines.

But why? Why do people lie?

Before I answer this, I think we need to put aside our feeling that the public health officials and medical doctors who have been lying to us for two and a half years now are evil people doing Satan’s work.

Just for a moment, let’s give them all the benefit of the doubt. Let’s insist on believing that these are well-intentioned people who care as deeply about the nation’s health and any individual’s wellbeing as you and I do.

But, wait. If these aren't evil people perpetuating a depopulation agenda, then why are they lying, censoring science, and shutting down honest and open discussions about vaccine safety? (And if you got the vaccines and you’re feeling sorry you did so, how did you get so duped?)

1. A fish can’t see the water it swims in.

When you spend your life in an echo chamber, speaking only to people who share your beliefs, it doesn’t even cross your mind that you may be wrong. The idea that the human immune system is inherently flawed and that modern science must rescue it is so deeply engrained in the Big Pharma-funded world view that most people in medicine cannot even entertain the idea that there are ways to support healthy immunity that have nothing to do with vaccines.

2. They have too much skin in the game.

Follow the money. When everything you espouse not only resonates with all the people around you but also benefits you financially, professionally, and socially, it’s very hard to see anything else (see #1). The mRNA vaccines have generated mind-boggling amounts of money for the elite. C-section birth is much more lucrative for hospitals and doctors than vaginal birth, so of course that “emergency” C-section your doctor was paid double to perform was absolutely medically necessary. At least that’s what he thinks. Chronically ill people make big money for Big Medicine.

So if you're wondering who to trust and who to believe, I recommend finding out what hands are feeding them. The CDC takes a huge amount of money from Big Pharma. Big Pharma and other Big Industry are also funding most of our legacy media outlets.

Medical doctors also benefit enormously from giving vaccines. Ka-ching! Dissidents, on the other hand, usually have very little to gain and EVERYTHING to lose by speaking out against a broken system.

Sure, there are lots of snake oil salesmen in both camps. But most of the people fighting against forced vaccination have nothing to sell you and nothing to gain. Joshua Coleman came to Maine to speak at Health Choice Maine's Find Your Light conference. He was a regular Joe, happily and unquestioningly going along with the system. Until his son was permanently paralyzed by his toddler vaccinations. Otto, who's almost 13, has been unable to walk ever since. Parents like Joshua have nothing to gain from speaking up about vaccine safety; they get ridiculed, vilified, discriminated against, and shunned. Moderna and Pfizer employees want to buy luxury penthouses in Boston. Parents of children who have brain and immune damage from vaccines want to help other families avoid the unbelievable amounts of suffering they've gone through. THEIR children have already been damaged; now they’re fighting for YOURS. You decide who you want to believe.

3. Their oversized egos won’t let them stop lying.

If you agree with me that most people are trying to do good, then you will understand why it’s so hard for them to stop lying, to the public and to themselves. Admitting you’ve done something wrong, however inadvertently, is really painful. Your ego can’t let you recognize the truth. So in order to save your own face, you continue to perpetuate lies. Until, that is, the evidence against what you’ve been telling people—or a personal disaster—is so overwhelming that even your ego can no longer prevent you from seeing it.

Dr. Gregory Poland, M.D., is now suffering from life-disabling tinnitus, courtesy of the mRNA vaccines.

Dr. Michel Goldman, a Belgian immunologist who has been promoting vaccines his entire career, is having a resurgence of aggressive cancer, courtesy of the mRNA vaccines.

A mom who told me she used to ridicule “anti-vaxxers” on Twitter has a teenage son whose heart has been damaged by the mRNA vaccines.

All of these are insiders, people who have never had a reason to question medicine's cultural assumptions. But now they're facing a crisis of confidence. They may not see that the entire COVID-19 vaccine program needs to be halted, but they're beginning to understand—albeit slowly—that they’ve been horribly duped.

This got long. If you made it this far, thanks for reading. You may have noticed an empty inbox the last two Thursdays. I’ve been having a hard time keeping up with real-life events, article deadlines, editing work, as well as caring for a loved one having some health challenges. I haven’t quite been able to keep up with everything. Forgive me.

❤️ Love,

Jennifer

p.s. If you’re reading closely, you will have noticed that I have nothing to sell you but my thoughts and ideas.

Subscribe to Jennifer Margulis newsletter here:

https://jennifermargulis.net/

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/n...ce-membershtml

National Guard Gives Service Members COVID-19 Vaccine Instead Of Influenza Shot

Planet Today
Oct 6, 2022

Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The National Guard administered the COVID-19 vaccine to multiple service members who were lined up for the influenza vaccine, including a member who objected to the COVID-19 vaccine on religious grounds, according to officials and one of the members.
A COVID-19 vaccine is prepared in a file image.

A COVID-19 vaccine is prepared in a file image. (Stephen Zenner/Getty Images)

The incident took place in late 2021.

Share Planet Today

During a vaccination clinic where both flu and COVID-19 vaccines were being administered, “three service members were accidently given a COVID vaccine,” Maj. Carl Lamb, a spokesman for the Maine National Guard, told The Epoch Times in an email.

Mathew Bouchard, who is no longer with the Guard, has identified himself as one of the members.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...1_500x300.jpeg

Bouchard said he was ordered to receive an annual flu vaccine and went to the clinic to get that vaccine. He verified his name, date of birth, and part of his social security number, and told officials at the clinic he was there for the flu vaccine. But he was injected with a dose of a messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine, officials told him.

“‘You know how you went in for the flu shot? Well, that wasn’t a flu shot. That was a COVID-19 vaccine,'” Bouchard told The Epoch Times, recounting the meeting with superiors.

“I think, in my mind, at that point, it was like, I completely didn’t know if I trusted any people in the military,” he added.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...e_500x625.jpeg

Former Maine National Guardsman Mathew Bouchard.

Former Maine National Guardsman Mathew Bouchard. (Courtesy of Mathew Bouchard)
Religious Objections

Each branch of the military ordered members to get vaccinated, after Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, a Biden appointee, in August of 2021 directed them to do so.

Under federal law, medical and religious exemptions can be sought. The military has been using form letters with striking similarities to deny many religious exemption requests, federal judges have found, and several branches are blocked from taking punitive action against religious objectors.

Bouchard says he was pursuing a religious exemption due to his Christian faith when he was injected with a vaccine against his will. At the time, he only had several months left before his enlistment was over.

Donate Subscriptions

Bouchard believes the vaccine mixup was intentional, noting how the military has aggressively tried to pressure members to get vaccinated. The purpose would be to get members to re-enlist, he thinks.

“I think what they did was they thought soldiers who don’t want it and they accidentally get it are just going to come around and continue their service. So I feel like that was a way to vaccinate people,” Bouchard said.

Read more here...

Thanks for reading Planet Today! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

By clicking on the link below you will find links to the several news stories listed below.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3


U.S. Stockpiles $290 Million in NIH-Funded Radiation Sickness Drug

Hearing on Dr. Nass Suspension Set for Oct. 11 After Maine Medical Board Withdraws ‘Misinformation’ Allegations

FDA, CDC Urge All Adults to Get 5th COVID Shot Despite No Safety or Efficacy Data


The Origins of COVID: All Evidence Points to a Cover-Up


Chemical Found in Common Household Products Linked to Arthritis


Feds Cooked Up Detailed Propaganda Plan to Push COVID Shots, Documents Reveal


CDC Will Stop Issuing Daily Updates of COVID Cases, Deaths + More


BlackRock Invests in Censorship + More

https://www.americaoutloud.com/covid...home-to-roost/

An AI audio reading of this article is available at original site.

americaoutloud.com

COVID-19: The Chickens are Now Coming Home to Roost - America Out Loud
America's
9-11 minutes

by Rogier Fentener van Vlissingen
read about author at end

October 7, 2022

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The chickens are now coming home to roost. Big pharma, as well as the politicians, the doctors, and the regulators who supported the vax campaign, have lost a lot of credibility, even before facing probably two decades of lawsuits and potentially criminal prosecutions (Bill Gates is already up on charges for murder by the vaccine in India).

You said you could not see the elephant in the room? Neither could I! It’s supposed to be a virus, too small to see, but I am also getting a lot of static. Growing dissent among the Covid dissenters is not helping, but it is a fact of life and to be expected. One of the bright lights has been the US/German Corona Investigative Committee, started by Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer. They have produced hundreds of hours of expert testimony relative to the Corona crisis.

They now seem to be having a falling out, resulting in the ouster of Fuellmich. It is questionable how long the committee can remain viable after this, but its work will stand. Meanwhile, it does not sound like Fuellmich will sit still, either. It’ll take some time for the dust to settle, but Fuellmich is now organizing a new entity, ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee). Also, Fuellmich is getting some criticism from other areas as well, with Eric Coppolino questioning why he has avoided the question of the existence of the virus, which seems critical. I previously wrote about the controversy between Breggin and Desmet, with Robert Malone caught in the crossfire. Last but not least, there is the question of lab origins or otherwise, which merely reaffirms the reality of the virus.

Unfortunately, these types of developments always get the headlines, but we are well advised to dig deeper and look into what may be really happening. The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. “One word of truth outweighs the world.” – Aleksander Solzhenitsyn.

We have arrived at the point where statistics from around the world (see a.o. the recent work of Denis Rancourt) show that all of the Corona measures have been grossly counter-productive, from the lockdowns to social distancing and masks to the vaccines. Also, the suppression of viable, cheap, and effective early treatments in favor of expensive, and far riskier drugs, such as Remdesvir, is now beginning to be understood, and the idea of putting all our eggs in one basket with the “warp speed” vaccine seems more deranged by the day. Very few things could be more dramatic than the recent testimony of Army Lt. Col. Theresa Long, MD. She was one such individual who stood up among the consensus culture of the army.

However, all this is much ado about nothing once you realize what is going on, which is our medical model is simply falling apart. One of the more insightful things to surface recently is the work of Denis Rancourt, who analyzed the whole process across all fifty states from the beginning until mid-2022. To put it bluntly, the data (excess mortality) suggests that the virus observed stop signs and political boundaries, given the differences in state-to-state outcomes. Since that was a bit unlikely, Rancourt concludes that the model of how a respiratory virus might spread does not line up with the actual facts on the ground, leading to the conclusion that human interventions are more to blame for the problem than any virus, if ever there was one.

Jonathan Engler over at Panda came to the same conclusions about the initial “spread” in Northern Italy. I.e., careful statistical analysis revealed that the spread was more about differential policies in different communities than a normal viral spread model, which would not make observer political differences, bringing us to the final point, the virus itself. The statistical analysis by Rancourt is based on the data after it was all (mostly) over.

Had the world been more educated about vitamin D (sunshine!), as well as nasal flushes and gargling, there would never have been a pandemic. For high-risk patients, there were early treatment protocols that could have saved millions around the world. The universal fear campaign and the house arrest of the population (lockdowns) did more damage than any virus. Curiously, in the 1918 Spanish flu, NYC developed the infamous steam radiator, which produced enough heat so you could have fresh air and be comfortable at the same time. But we forgot all the lessons of history.

Germ Theory versus Terrain Theory

Before Anthony Fauci, Louis Pasteur had held the world title for scientific fraud, always brown-nosing at the French court and failing upward based on bamboozling his political patrons with false claims that were never fully understood, until the publication of his diaries, long after his death. Still, towards the end of his life, he is reported to have endorsed the ideas of his rival Antoine Béchamp: “The microbe is nothing, the terrain is everything.” Without even getting into the matter of the physical proof of the existence of a virus, the issue was if diseased tissue attracted viruses or viruses caused healthy tissue to be diseased. Or, to put it more crudely: will killing the flies solve your garbage problem? Clearly not. Which is not to say you might not have to kill some flies even if you solve your garbage problem. During this particular go-around, there were perhaps two major issues that entered the discussion, one being vitamin D, and the other some research that was reported in the British Medical Journal into the reduction of the risk of “moderate to severe” Covid outcomes based on diets.

Unsurprisingly, anti-inflammatory diets were the winners, as was explained in a lovely video by Dr. Brooke Goldner: a 73% risk reduction for plant-based diets; a 59% reduction for pescetarian (plants + fish), to a 20% increased risk for the ever popular low carb, high-fat diets (Atkins, Paleo, Keto). The upshot is that if nutrition plays such a huge role, the signs now point to terrain theory, not germ theory. We know that from the mortality from the virus also: the preponderance of deaths in 2020 were older, sicker people, above average life expectancy, and comorbidities (95% with 4+ comorbidities, 67% with 6+ comorbidities). This was evident from the outset, even from the earliest analyses, like the Diamond Princess.

As to the elephant itself, or rather, the virus – you can’t see it, because it is imaginary, that is the message of the growing cadre of doctors and scientists who are favoring terrain theory and the legacy of Béchamp over Pasteur’s brainchild of germ theory, which he ended up doubting himself. This growing groundswell is quickly becoming unstoppable; perhaps this particular round gained strength with Dr. Samantha Bailey from New Zealand joining the German authors for a third edition of the book Virus Mania. Eventually, a formal scientific challenge was developed by a group of doctors who shared these views, such as The Virus Challenge, which is accessible to anybody on the website of Dr. Tom Cowan. More popular material exists in the form of the documentary by Steve Falconer/Spacebusters: The End of Germ Theory, and a longer (7.5 hours) documentary, The Viral Delusion, eminently worth watching.

Lastly, there is Christine Massey, who has obtained records from over 200 institutions in 40+ countries, and nobody, but nobody, has ever isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus anywhere; it is only theoretical in a computer model. Sol Luckman is launching an initiative to Join the terrain train for all of us who would question the germ theory of disease. The longer you think about it, the more ridiculous it gets, there was an absolutely dogmatic determination to see something, and when they did not, they simply decided it must be too small to see. Still, that argument became untenable with electron microscopes. No problem, now we resort to computer simulations to sustain the belief in a singular cause.

The punch line: Pharmageddon

If these things are so obvious, how come most people still don’t know? Changing the paradigm takes time and effort, and there are psychological and economic reasons why the germ theory paradigm is attractive and has a lot of stickiness. Psychologically, it is easier to accept the idea of a single cause, preferably one external to me. Diet and lifestyle mean I am responsible for my health. A virus means I get off scot-free; I get to have my cake and eat it too: live on Coke and potato chips and aim my anti-aircraft fire at the virus.

It gets worse: with the Rockefeller medicine reforms about one hundred years ago, germ theory was raised to the official dogma, and allopathic medicine was the new catechism, with the AMA as the co-conspirator who served their own interest of keeping women, children, and the poor out of medicine while raising doctor’s incomes (see the book Rockefeller’s Medicine Men). More importantly, it would sell more oil, as petrochemical feedstock was the major input to the pharmaceutical industry. Reason enough to like it, at least for Rockefeller, although he preferred to see a homeopathic physician.

The time for a drastic overhaul of healthcare is here, and numerous developments around the country and the world are underway. It is no longer about “drug prices” or “access” but about the fact that the healthcare system post-Covid is itself the first or second leading cause of premature death.

_______________

Rogier Fentener van Vlissingen

Rogier Fentener van Vlissingen is a Dutch native, living in America since 1979, in both Connecticut and New York. He has worked in international shipping and most recently he has mostly been involved in energy efficiency and retrofitting. He is also a co-founder of a biotech, BCM Industries, which develops autologous organ repair tissues, and also a line of revolutionary IT equipment, computers and storage appliances, running on live neurons. He is an eager student of business, literature, history and spiritual traditions. He also teaches whole foods, plant-based nutrition and cooking. He published his first book in Holland in 1973.

In 2007, Rogier published the book Closing the Circle: The Gospel of Thomas and A Course in Miracles. He blogs about energy retrofitting, energy finance, spirituality and whole-foods, plant-based nutrition and healthcare.

________________

Dachsie comment:

I must admit that I was very intrigued by this article and was going along great until I got to the end and saw this about the author: "In 2007, Rogier published the book Closing the Circle: The Gospel of Thomas and A Course in Miracles. "

I am too left brain to appreciate this what I consider to be a foray into woo woo land.

I agree with this statement.

"The time for a drastic overhaul of healthcare is here, and numerous developments around the country and the world are underway. It is no longer about “drug prices” or “access” but about the fact that the healthcare system post-Covid is itself the first or second leading cause of premature death. "

I question every term of the official narrative and I appreciate open discussion and consider it to be a necessary part of science and reason and common sense. It seems to me in our arguing against the official narrative we have fallen into some kind of trap or trick.

The healthcare system was in serious trouble for several decades before "COVID."

All I care about is honest professionals to use their knowledge in a practical way to help people who become very ill from the diseases they call "COVID" or are like "COVID." Whatever forces working for the official "pandemic" narrative are either about to succeed splendidly or fail colossally, and our country and the world will go along that direction.

I know Who is ultimately in charge of everything.

I suspected this was a complete scam the day they announced the first case in the USA arriving in Washington state. I had seen the 'Event 201' video, then Ares posting about the financial debacle in the overnight repo market put the 'icing on the cake' so to speak. It was all about transferring the wealth from the middle class to the billionaire class.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/g...m_source=email

Groundbreaking lawsuit filed against Peter Daszak, Ralph Baric over SARS-CoV-2 gain of function research and hazardous RELEASE

Planet Today
2 hr ago, October 8, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1280x720.jpeg

(Planet Today) A groundbreaking lawsuit has been filed by attorney Thomas Renz, naming EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak and University of North Carolina researcher Ralph Baric as defendants, claiming they are responsible for the deaths of plaintiffs due to their involvement in funding gain-of-function research of the SARS-CoV-2 virus which is believed to be responsible for the “covid pandemic.”

Share Planet Today

According to the lawsuit, a copy of which is posted at Renz-Law.com, Daszak and Baric conspired to circumvent gain-of-function funding restrictions and transfer both money and technology to Dr. Zheng-Li (the so-called “Bat Lady”) at the Wuhan bioweapons research facility in China, where the final work on SARS-CoV-2 was conducted, weaponizing it against humanity. Once completed, the weapon was released upon the world, causing the deaths of plaintiffs.

We welcome responses from both Daszak and Baric if they disagree with these claims and wish to offer their own explanation for the events in which they have involvement.

See a backup copy of the lawsuit papers at this NaturalNews files location (PDF).
CDC engaged in criminal conspiracy cover-up to hide V-safe data

In addition to the bombshell lawsuit against Daszak and Baric, the CDC has been caught red-handed, engaged in what I would classify as a criminal conspiracy cover-up to withhold V-safe data from the public for nearly two years.

This data set from the V-Safe app has just been acquired by ICAN (Del Bigtree and attorney Aaron Siri), and is revealing that 7.7% of people who took covid vaccines suffered so many injuries that they needed medical care, while another 25% had their lives turned upside down as vaccine side effects caused them to miss work or to halt “normal life activities.”

As The Epoch Times reports:

Hundreds of thousands of Americans sought medical care after getting a COVID-19 vaccine, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data released on Oct. 3.

Roughly 782,900 people reported seeking medical attention, emergency room care, and/or hospitalization following COVID-19 vaccination. Another 2.5 million people reported needing to miss school, work, or other normal activities as a result of a health event after getting a COVID-19 vaccine.

You can see the full data set via ICAN’s website at this dashboard link:
https://www.icandecide.org/v-safe-data/

It shows that out of about 10 million vaccine recipients who used the V-safe app, 33% were impacted with injuries or other interruptions, and nearly 6.5 million health impacts were reported.

The CDC fought hard to prevent this information from being released to the public, proving that Walensky and others engaged in a criminal conspiracy cover-up to hide the truth about vaccine injuries from the public, resulting in potentially millions of additional deaths or injuries taking place that would have otherwise been averted if people knew the truth.
The CDC is a corrupt, criminal organization

We now know without any question that the CDC is a crime cartel that promotes Big Pharma’s death shots which are injuring or killing millions of Americans. At every opportunity, the CDC will hide the truth about vaccine injuries and deceive the public, all while promoting more shots for everyone, including children.

CDC director Walensky should be immediately arrested by the DOJ and charged with at least one count of criminal fraud and negligence for each and every American who was injured or killed by these hazardous covid vaccines.

Instead, the White House and a complicit mass media will call for more censorship of anyone who talks about vaccines being dangerous, falsely claiming that such talk is “disinformation” when, in reality, the CDC’s own data now shows that covid vaccines are the most dangerous medical intervention ever administered to the public at large… far more dangerous than Thalidomide, Vioxx, statins or any other drug that has maimed or killed innocent people over the decades.

These deadly, hazardous vaccines must be stopped, and those who dishonestly pushed them must be held accountable through arrest and prosecution for their heinous crimes against children and all of humanity.

Learn more in today’s Situation Update podcast, which contains yet more bombshell information:

– Lawsuit claims Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric are responsible for DEATHS from covid
– Claims they funneled money into gain-of-function research in Wuhan
– Could set legal precedent for massive wave of lawsuits against Fauci, Walensky and others
– CDC (Walensky) conspiracy confirmed: They covered up V-Safe data showing widespread vaccine injuries
– 7.7% of those who took vaccine were injured, 25% couldn’t work
– Bank of England admits it was only HOURS away from total collapse
– European gold and silver mints will CEASE operations due to energy shortage
– Biden pardons marijuana possession (federal) but still criminalizes CBD
– China military drones air lift armed robot dogs into battle zones
– US buys anti-radiation drugs to prepare for nuclear war
– Germany to become “industrial museum” as energy supply collapses
– Interview with Tom Luongo on currency wars, Europe vs. the Fed

Video: https://www.planet-today.com/2022/10...d-against.html

See more stories about vaccines at Vaccines.news

(Article by Mike Adams republished from Citizens.news)

Thanks for reading Planet Today! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/7...m_source=email

700 million people will DIE from COVID injections, says Dr. David Martin

Planet Today
3 hr ago, October 8, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1000x563.jpeg

(Planet Today) It is a chilling thought to think of just how many people in the coming months and years are going to die because of getting “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

Share Planet Today

According to Dr. David Martin, as many as 700 million people worldwide will succumb to an early grave because of the shots, which we know flood a person’s body with deadly, clot-forming spike proteins (Related: Fauci Flu shots are also causing people to go bald).

Martin came up with this number after poring through data from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) “Decade of Vaccines” vision, which was put together in collaboration with billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, who lives to vaccinate.

It was in 2011 when the WHO announced the Decade of Vaccines plan, which aims to depopulate the world by about 15 percent. That figure amounts to about 700 million people.

Back in August 2021, Dr. Robert Young estimated that 500 million people worldwide had already at that time been injured by the jabs, with possibly 35 million deaths.

This past August, Steve Kirsch threw out a more conservative ballpark figure of 12 million deaths from covid jabbing, based on an estimate of one death per 1,000 doses.

“We are killing nearly close to 10,000 people every single day,” Kirsch wrote.
“It’s going to get much worse,” Martin warns

That same month, Peter Halligan pieced together data suggesting that as many as 20 million people have thus far died from the shots, while a whopping 2.2 billion have suffered at least one injury.

All of this suggests that things are only just getting started in terms of the fallout from these mystery injections. Assuming only 20 million people have died, we are only about three percent of the way there to the full death count.

To think that hundreds of millions of people are now the walking dead – meaning they could drop dead at any moment once the clots fully form in just the right spot – is nothing short of disturbing.

“It’s going to get much worse,” warned Martin during an hourlong interview with USA Watchdog back in June, referring to the injections as “bioweapons.”

“It is not a coronavirus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction manual to make the human body produce a toxin.”

“The fact of the matter is the injections are an act of biomicroweapons and bioterrorism. They are not a public health measure. The facts are very simple. This was premeditated … This was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. That is their own words and not my interpretation.”

In the United States, Martin expects up to one-third of the entire population to be dead by the time this is all said and done. Anywhere from 75 million to 100 million people who took the jabs will have passed away by the time these injections run their course around 2028.

“There are a lot of reasons why they hope it will be between now and 2028 because there is this tiny little glitch of the illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs,” Martin says.

“So, the fewer recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better. Not surprisingly, the recommendation was people over the age of 65 were the first ones to get injected.”

Martin also spoke about all the pilots who are suffering microvascular and clotting problems due to all their time up in the air. This is, of course, dangerous for both passengers and folks on the ground who could end up becoming the unlucky ones with an airplane through their roof.

The latest news about Chinese Virus shots can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

(Article by Ethan Huff republished from Citizens.news)