Coronavirus

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email

TICKING TIME BOMB: Swedish study presents evidence that mRNA COVID “vaccines” progressively increase hospitalization and death risk over time

Planet Today
4 hr ago

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._1000x563.jpeg

(Planet Today) New research out of Sweden shows that people who get “vaccinated” with messenger RNA (mRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” end up with a severely degraded immune system in the months that follow.

Share Planet Today

Not only are the “fully vaccinated” more prone to catching the so-called “omicron” (aka moronic) variant of the Chinese Virus, the study found that they also suffer an increased risk of hospitalization or death roughly a year after their second dose.

This means that getting jabbed for COVID leaves a person more likely to get sick or die, not less likely like Joe Biden, Tony Fauci and others in government insist. (Related: Spike proteins from mRNA injections accumulate in the heart and brain.)

After about five months post-injection, an mRNA-injected person starts to show serious signs of immune degradation. By nine months, immune capacity plunges to extreme lows, followed by negative efficacy at the one-year mark and beyond.

“This data provides real-world evidence of possible vaccine-caused ‘antibody dependent enhancement,'” wrote Alex Berenson on his Substack. “In ADE, vaccines cause our immune systems to produce antibodies that help a virus or other pathogen to attack us.”
British data confirms that COVID injections have negative efficacy

Berenson noted that the number of actual deaths assessed in the study during the later time periods are admittedly small, which means the findings “should not be viewed as definitive.”

The confidence intervals, he added, “widen hugely after 40 weeks.”

On the other hand, the findings corroborate those put together by Exposé News, which has been reporting on the negative efficacy of COVID injections for quite some time now using data out of England.

By all appearances, COVID injections do little, if anything, to provide protection against any kind of infection. They actually seem to damage the immune system, leaving it more prone to disease.

According to Dr. Yiyi Xi, the paper’s lead author, more data is needed to determine with pinpoint accuracy the true risk severity of post-injection hospitalization and/or death at the one-year mark and beyond.

There is also the matter of which statistical method is best for such calculations. A different one from the one used in the study, described as standard polynomial regression, found the jabs to be moderately effective against hospitalization and death, which skews the results.

“With ‘standard’ (a.k.a. single polynomial) regression … you can fit any data, if you give it enough freedom,” Berenson explained, quoting an independent expert. “The price for that, is that the better it fits the data you give it, the worse it will be at explaining new data, and especially so at the edges.”

“Splines, due to the way they are built, avoid this problem and produce more sensical (hence more useful) predictive models.”

Another independent expert who “happen[s] to believe strongly that these vaccines will have negative efficacy” said that as a statistician, it would be remiss to make that claim with confidence “off the back of a spline like this.”

So, all that to say, the Swedish study may or may not prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Fauci Flu shots degrade immunity and leave a person worse off than if he had simply left his immune system alone. It does, however, add to a growing body of evidence that suggests that very thing.

“Sadly, I suspect for many of the deeply hypnotized, this information (assuming they ever are allowed, or allow themselves, to see it), even though I suspect it overstates any protection offered, will probably just reinforce their conviction that getting a ‘booster’ every three months or so makes sense, and is the way to go,” wrote one of Berenson’s readers.

The latest news about injuries and deaths caused by Chinese Virus shots can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

(Article by Ethan Huff, republished from Citizens.news)

_____________

Dachsie comment:

Always click on title of article posted as it is a link that will take you to the article at the original site of posting and there you will find the fully hyperlinked article that will provide deeper sources of information relating to the article contents.

Apocalypse 6:8
Douay-Rheims Bible

And behold a pale horse, and he that sat upon him, his name was Death, and hell followed him. And power was given to him over the four parts of the earth, to kill with sword, with famine, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.
_____

Revelation 6:8
King James Bible

And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

_______________________
Apocalypse 9:15
Douay-Rheims Bible

And the four angels were loosed, who were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year: for to kill the third part of men.
____
Revelation 9:15
King James Bible

And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.

https://planettoday.substack.com/p/s...m_source=email

Scientific experiments show it is nearly IMPOSSIBLE to transmit a respiratory virus to another person


Planet Today
5 hr ago October 8, 2022

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...4a_550x309.png

(Planet Today) Believe it or not, respiratory viruses like rhinoviridae (the common cold) and coronaviridae (coronaviruses such as covid) do not transmit from person to person as is commonly believed.

Share Planet Today

Back in March, the UK Vaccine Taskforce funded a human challenge study for SARS-CoV-2, published in the journal Nature Medicine, that exposed unvaccinated participants to a “wild-type” version of the alleged covid virus intranasally. Out of 34 participants, only 18 of them, or 53 percent, developed what researchers described as “PCR-confirmed infection” – all with mild-to-moderate symptoms.

PCR testing, just to be clear, is not a valid way to detect viruses. As we reported late last year, PCR testing for the Fauci Flu is inherently fraudulent. So even those who tested “positive” may or may not have actually had COVID.

Whatever was sprayed into the participants’ noses, assuming it was the infamous COVID, clearly did not affect all of them. And even those it did affect made out just fine in the end.

Another study conducted back in 1984 exposed a small group of 14 volunteers, five of which were dubbed “donors” since they had been infected with rhinovirus as the selected “shedding agent.” The other nine were dubbed as “recipients.”

All of the volunteers were confined to a small room with no outside ventilation. They interacted, sang together, and played cards, all activities that based on common knowledge today should have resulted in the nine recipients becoming infected, right? It turns out that not a single one of them became infected.

Other similar experiments as part of the same study were conducted as well, including a 12-day evaluation in a sealed dormitory. Only a couple of recipients in those scenarios developed cold symptoms, however, it is important to note that researchers were never able to isolate any rhinovirus from the air. (Related: The covid “virus” has never been proven to exist.)
Don’t be fearful of other people – their breath can’t make you sick

Prof. Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson conducted their own review into the transmission ability of influenza-like illnesses (ILI) based on these various studies and confirmed that it is next to impossible for someone to “catch” a respiratory illness from someone else – which means face masks and other mitigatory measures are useless.

“If you have followed these experiments and paid attention, just like the authors, you might conclude how difficult it is to transmit ILI experimentally, even in everyday work that includes close contact and touching,” the duo writes.

“These famous experiments are relevant to coronaviridae transmission. Although rhinoviridae and coronaviridae lock on cell membranes using different receptors … the only difference … seems to be the length of incubation and shedding.”

Heneghan, by the way, teaches evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford. He is also the director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) and regularly appears in the media.

Jefferson is a clinical epidemiologist and senior associate tutor at the University of Oxford. He and Heneghan together write articles for the “Trust the Evidence” Substack.

Their article about respiratory virus transmission is one part in a seven-part series entitled “The SARS-CoV-2 transmission riddle,” which unpacks how poor-quality and superficial science was used to basically destroy the world with the covid scamdemic.

“Is anyone really surprised by this research?” asked a reader in response to the revelation. “The whole pandemic was a farce.”

“A cold or ‘ILIs’ have not unequivocally been proven to exist or to be the cause of cold-like symptoms,” said another. “To believe otherwise is to solely rely on germ theory, ignoring all others.”

Interesting in learning more about Chinese Virus injections? Visit ChemicalViolence.com.

(Article by Ethan Huff republished from Citizens.news)

Dachsie update edit:

Dachsie transcript --
video clip that got Dr. Peter McCullough permanently banned from Twitter.
_____

“…When the Republicans come in to power in the House, they’re set to have strong subpoena power, investigation power, …

Senator Ron Johson posted over 40 senatorial letters which are bascially plce-holders for investigations…

And I think the FDA commissioner is in deep trouble, and the NIH division director are in deep trouble, CDC director.. you know..

They’re going to have nowhere to hide to.

The publications make it clear.

It was a government operation that created SARS-CoV-2 and the spike protein.

It’s the U S government that did it.

And they were working on the threat and working on the response, which was various forms of antigens to be injected or monoclonal antibodies.

But it’s clear it was a U S government operation. The work was done in China and there was Chinese collaboration.

You know, Maderna CEO, Stephan Bancel, he was the CEO of was the CEO BioMerieux,
And he built the Wuhan bio-security lab with the Chinese when he was leading that French company. He built that lab. Then he leaves in 2015, and he joins Maderna.
And then Maderna co-writes the patent with the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

You probably heard me say Maderna is suing Pfizer over the patent…
Yes, people ask my opinion …
So people ask my opinion –
I said yes.

You know, this will all come to light. It takes a long time to write a patent. Patent prosecution takes a long time.
Maderna and the U S government wrote the patent on the product a long time ago. And we knew this because when the crisis was announced in the United States three days later, Maderna announces they have a product.

How can they have a product in three days? You can’t invent something in three days.
This was planned.
This was all planned.

And Peter Breggin, who you mentioned, in his Global Predators book*, Breggin says – he puts this in his timeline –

36 pandemic preparedness events since 2012 - --36---, 25 of which generated documents and then…”

*book -- COVID-19 and the Global Predators

By Peter Breggin and Ginger Breggin






____________________


WATCH THIS 2:20 video clip.. Why Dr. Peter McCullough was permanently banned from Twitter.

https://twitter.com/SJWilliams123/st...m_medium=emailhttps://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...i4qpoqg1TA--~D

Sarah Jane ��
@SJWilliams123
This is why they took him down

From
Sophia Dahl
5:37 AM · Oct 7, 2022
·Twitter for iPhone
7,863
Retweets
567

_________

Source

Jeff Childers' Substack
October 8, 2022

In the clip, Dr. McCullough persuasively accused the U.S. government of having created SARS-CoV-2 and the spike protein. No wonder twitter deleted him. This stuff is very dangerous to the narrative.

But the information is getting out anyway, faster than they can pass laws to prevent it.

Go HERE to access links to each of the stories below.

https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3

Recommended Media

Financial Rebellion: One Nation Under Blackmail With Whitney Webb

Friday Roundtable: Remdesivir Lawsuit, Vaccine-related Aluminum Exposure Linked to Asthma

WATCH TODAY:

Good Morning CHD With Paul Marik, M.D. + With Pierre Kory, M.D., M.P.A. — 10am ET // 7am PT

An Informed Life Radio: James Lyons-Weiler Responds to Paul Offit’s Aluminum Misinformation

Good Morning CHD: Can We Talk About It? With Bri Dressen, Cat Parker + Aga Wilson

Tea Time: Unvaxxed Kids Healthier Than Vaxxed With Russell Blaylock, M.D.

The Solution: We Need to Wake Up With Dr. Jason Dean — Watch Today 12pm PT // 3pm ET

Good Morning CHD: Why Homeschool? Hosted by Sarah Kenoyer

TUESDAY: Meryl Nass, M.D. Official Hearing — WATCH LIVE 1pm ET // 10am PT

Dachsie -- IMPORTANT Gracious Update

We can watch the entire Epoch TV show with Jeff Childers this evening, October 8, 2022, at 6:30 pm Central for me.

HERE

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

Coffee & Covid 2022 ��
☕️ C&C NEWS UPDATE ☙ Saturday, October 8, 2022 ☙ FREE LINK FOR EPOCH INTERVIEW ��
A no-subscription-required link to my Epoch Times interview tonight
Jeff Childers
25 min ago

After noticing some questions about access in the comments, I made a few inquiries and was able to obtain a “free” link to my American Thought Leaders interview tonight on Epoch TV. They told me this link does not require a subscription for viewing, and said it was okay to share it with anyone you think might need to, or want to, see it.

PREMIERING 7:30PM ET: Attorney Jeff Childers on How He Won Against Mask and Vaccine Mandates, and Inspired Other Lawyers to Do the Same

https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...n=JeffChilders

Hope it works and is helpful.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/..._2080x1124.png

_______________________


Dachsie request: Sunday, October 8, 2022

It sure would be awful nice if someone who is a paid member of Epoch TV and when they start watching this show this evening to copy and paste the full URL into a reply post in this thread so we all can watch the full live video too.

Hoping and thanking you kind soul in advance.
___________________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...e-btn-copylink

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

 *THE C&C ARMY POST* 

殺 But first! I’ll be appearing on Epoch TV tonight, in a terrific one-on-one interview on “American Thought Leaders.” They did a fantastic job, and you guys will just love the subject matter. It ties in nicely with today’s epic post.

This is a preview clip only.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...e-btn-copylink

I’ll admit that I’m a little self-conscious about it because that was the first interview where they plastered make-up on me. Ugh. I’m pretty enough, at least Michelle thinks so.

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/chan...dures-469a8014

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...r9P1_wzy.g--~D

Changes in Red Cross Blood Screening Procedures

Simay B
Squad Leader at Diverse Articulation | Evidence-based Science Journalism
Oct. 7, 2022, 10:00 a.m.
Journalist Article

Changes in the medical screening practices of the Red Cross for blood donor eligibility have been observed. The questionnaires now include the record of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The medication deferral list includes the experimental vaccines as they may affect a person’s eligibility to donate blood. When the pandemic began in 2020, the Red Cross began testing blood donors for COVID-19 antibodies but they have completely stopped the procedure and now focus on vaccines.

A person who would like to donate blood to the Red Cross needs to read and answer a list of questions to find out if they are eligible. The Red Cross assures the public that donors who received COVID-19 shots can still give blood as long as they are symptom-free and feeling well at the time of donation. However, under the eligibility guidelines applied to vaccine recipients, a donor needs to provide the name of the manufacturer of the vaccine received to determine the deferral time to be implemented.
A Need for a Greater Blood Supply

Challenges in the blood supply were already present even before the emergence of COVID-19. The pandemic brought about a crisis for blood services as the spread of infection caused cancellations of blood drives. In 2022, the number of weekly cases has continued to decrease, and local governments have started to loosen public health restrictions. The worst part of the pandemic appears to have passed, but crises in the blood supply have not ended.

The concern about blood availability is not due to increased demand for transfusion, but because of the decline in supply due to reduced donations. As a result of the unprecedented blood supply shortage, hospitals are forced to delay or reschedule surgeries. To prevent these problems, the Red Cross continues to encourage the public to donate blood.
COVID-19 Vaccine and Blood Donation

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted an emergency use authorization (EUA) to Pfizer-BioNTech on December 11, 2020. Since then, different varieties of vaccines have been developed against COVID-19 such as messenger RNA (mRNA), vector vaccine, and protein subunit vaccine. As of October 1, 2022, about 68% of the world’s population has received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

With the majority of the population receiving jabs, the screening process for blood now includes the donors’ vaccination status. As part of the Red Cross screening process, the blood donor is asked a series of personal questions to ensure that it is safe for patients to receive their blood and that it is safe for the donor to give blood on the appointed day.

On March 17, 2020, Gail McGovern, president and chief executive officer of the American Red Cross reassured the public that “blood donation is a safe process, and that we have put additional precautions in place at our drive drives.”
Eligibility Guidelines Concerning COVID Shots

Ten organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO), FDA, and Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies (AABB), released various recommendations on the deferral periods for blood donors who had received COVID-19 vaccine. The deferral periods range from zero to 28 days, depending on whether the donor received a live or inactivated vaccine.

Among these organizations, the Red Cross follows the eligibility guidelines set by the FDA. Updated information for blood establishments regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and blood donation was released by the FDA on January 11, 2022. It suggests that individuals who received a nonreplicating, inactivated, or mRNA-based vaccine can give blood without a waiting period, and there’s a short waiting period (e.g., 14 days) for donors who received a live-attenuated shot. As a response to these requirements, the Red Cross released the COVID-19 Vaccine & Booster Blood Donation Guide for Donors where the donor is expected to report the name of the vaccine manufacturer during the screening process.
Concerns for the Blood Recipients

There are significant differences in the public’s acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines, and this has also affected the acceptance of blood transfusions from COVID-19 vaccinated donors. Some patients refuse blood transfusions and demand physicians to disclose details of the donor, including whether the donor received a COVID-19 vaccine.

As reported in TrialSite, there are concerns about why vaccinated individuals are allowed to donate blood within two weeks after receiving the shot if the spike proteins circulate in the body for up to a month after mRNA vaccination. A study by the Stanford University Department of Pathology revealed that the blood of Pfizer vaccine recipients contains at least as much spike protein as unvaccinated individuals who were infected by the virus.

The Australian Red Cross advises donors to wait three days after receiving each jab before donating blood, plasma, or platelets regardless of the type of vaccine received because of the possible side effects such as mild fever.
Antibody Testing for Blood Donors

In the early period of the pandemic, the Red Cross tested all blood, platelet, and plasma donations for COVID-19 antibodies. The result helped inform the donors whether they have been exposed to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS Cov-2), the virus that carries COVID-19.

The antibody test was authorized by the FDA and helped indicate if the donor’s immune system had produced antibodies to the coronavirus, regardless of the development of symptoms. It was implemented for a limited time from June 15 – 30, 2020. They discontinued the program when infection rates decreased and new treatment options became available.

A positive result from the antibody test does not confirm infection or immunity, as it only indicates potential exposure to the virus.
Are We Repeating History?

Blood transfusion is one of the most frequently performed medical procedures, yet this practice has historically been mired in controversy such as when African-Americans were banned from donating blood during World War II. This was followed by a lifetime ban on blood donations on men who had sex with men (MSM) during the HIV/AIDS epidemic in the 1980s. During the mid-twentieth century, the U.S. National Blood Program encouraged blood donation and ensured that gender, race, and sexuality would not influence the transfusion process.

Practices in blood donation have improved, but the societal views of it remain controversial. The issues surrounding COVID-19 vaccines have led some patients to get worried about becoming infected with COVID-19 or developing long-term effects from the vaccine itself.

According to the AABB, there is no evidence that donated blood from COVID-19-vaccinated donors may pose a risk to recipients. It recognizes the importance of protecting blood donors and the blood supply by maintaining donor anonymity. Data privacy is also acknowledged by numerous organizations, as they consider it to be crucial in maintaining the relationship between volunteer blood donors and blood transfusion services.
COVID-19
Vaccines


_________

Dachsie comment:

I submitted a comment on this article but it is in review and I am not sure it will be published so I will share it with you here.

dachsie In review
Oct. 8, 2022, 12:16 p.m.

Everything about SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 and any and all of the COVID vaccines has been secret and emergency-use and experimental and liability shielded. We the people wisely no longer trust and have confidence in anything related to blood transfusions of blood donated by anyone based on any of the screening policies revealed in this article.

Anyone can see all the "holes" in these policies, even if there were no inaccuracies or manipulations in the data and no "mistakes" in their implementation.

Revelation 6:8
and
Revelation 9:15

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/c-a...m_source=email

Jeff Childers Substack newsletter October 8, 2022

Excerpt:

Related to lawsuit by Pam Popper's legal team. Dachsie thinks this is the same lawsuit Thomas Renz is involved in and that I posted about a few posts back. I think that posting included a link to the actual legal document, located on Thomas Renz website.

____


�� Yesterday, anti-vaccine activist Pam Popper announced that her lawyers successfully served Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance with a new “mass torts” lawsuit. http://drpampopper.com/about-pam/

Link: https://rumble.com/v1mwcg6-the-big-a...g-to-make.html (The lawsuit news starts at 2:25.)

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...c_1600x666.png

Popper said the lawsuit alleges that Daszak and EcoHealth are responsible for infecting people with an engineered virus, covid-19, and many people died. Imagine that. The lawsuit also sues 100 “John Does,” or as-yet-unidentified co-defendants who can be added later depending on what comes out of discovery.

It’s genius! This is the very first covid liability lawsuit that I am actually excited about. This one has a LOT of potential that previous lawsuits lacked, for several reasons.

First, Daszak and EcoHealth are not protected by the PREP Act or any other covid liability shield. They are alleged to have made a VIRUS, not a vaccine. Haha, there’s no liability protection for making viruses. So this lawsuit won’t have to navigate all legal landmines blocking lawsuits against agencies and pharma companies.

Second, even though I’ve not seen the actual complaint yet, I can easily imagine what it alleges. It will almost certainly survive the initial hurdle of dismissal, which means … discovery. Imagine, for a moment, how little a deep-state cockroach like Daszak will enjoy the excruciating scrutiny of producing under court order records, emails, and text messages that he never in a million years thought would ever see daylight.

Not to mention his deposition. How I long to attend that delightful interview.

Third, Daszak was almost certainly in close contact with top NIH scientists and bureaucrats, maybe intelligence agents, many of whom we do not yet know about. Assuming it plays out like I expect, we’re about to learn some new names, because the discovery will inevitably lead down the rabbit hole of all Daszak’s contacts and connections to government.

I would not be surprised if Daszak suddenly claims he is a paid government employee entitled to various protections, and claims that his communications and documents are classified government secrets. Wouldn’t that be something.

Let us not forget the Chinese. I think we might be on the verge of finally finding out EXACTLY why the NIH was using a Chinese lab to evade Obama-era bans on gain-of-function research. I’ll bet you a beagle puppy that none of the millions of relevant communications with U.S. health officials will include the statement, “Peter, be SURE you aren’t doing any gain of function research over there.”

I’d stake my life on it.

Fourth, and not even finally, the cover-ups will almost certainly be relevant in discovery. So the coordinated effort to bury the “lab leak” hypothesis will also be fair game in the lawsuit. Which means depositions of Fauci, Collins, and the rest of their devil’s gallery. The reason it’s relevant is simple; as I have told you many times, evidence of an attempt to conceal something provides a valid inference of consciousness of guilt.

Which makes the cover-up relevant evidence.

I could go on. But the takeaway for this morning is: this is the most important pandemic lawsuit filed to date, bar none. It probably couldn’t have been successfully filed any earlier than now. But now, the amount of evidence already available in the public record will put Popper’s lawyers on solid ground.

Popper’s team might need a multiplier. I’ll find out.

Dachsie comment:
There are apparently 3 or 4 different videos of Dr. McCullough that he discusses in this video that took place right before and it is speculation as which exact one video is the one that caused his suspension. Any video, is a good candidate and there are different "bombshell" data points mentioned variously among the videos. Naming of a specific video that triggered the suspension action by Twitter is speculation because we do not have that information.

Here is a Substack posting by Seve Kirsh of today, October 8, 2022, that relates to Dr. McCullough important recent videos.

I do not know the exact date of the Twitter suspension action but that would have to determine the "Dr. Peter McCullough's last tweet".

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...m_source=email

Excerpted video from that posting is included below.

This one gives important information, especially beginning around 13:19 onward.

https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...N_4Q70RN6Q--~D

https://rumble.com/v1n1066-the-video...m_medium=email

https://rumble.com/v1n1066-the-video...m_medium=email
Allison Royal
Published October 7, 2022 7,895 Views

21:46 video runtime

_______________

Dachsie comment - Part 2:

What Dr. McCullough stated in my early video of his of today in posting #3933, that I thought was extremely important was the
exact nature of SARS-VoV-2 . He provided important data points that shows that SARS-CoV-2 was CREATED in a laboratory. I believe that is an important contradiction to the official narrative that was provided to the public in late 2019 or early 2020.

"In late 2019, a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was
identified in Wuhan, China. The virus, which causes
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has contributed to
significant morbidity (illness) and mortality (death), as well
as severe public health and economic effects, among other
impacts.
In other words this contradicts the official narrative that SARS-CoV-2.

" In late 2019, a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was
identified in Wuhan, China. The virus, which causes
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has contributed to
significant morbidity (illness) and mortality (death), as well
as severe public health and economic effects, among other
impacts. "
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/if/if11822

https://crsreports.congress.gov
Updated June 11, 2021

_________

The original "official narrative about the pandemic" told us this SARS CoV-2 virus was

"zoonotic." a zoonotic disease (i.e.,
one that originated in animals) that mutated along with other coronaviruses over the hundreds of years.

"Mutation and adaptation have driven the co-evolution of coronaviruses (CoVs) and their hosts, including human beings, for thousands of years."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32226286/

This departure from the official narrative about SARS-CoV-2 meets my definition of "bombshell."
_________________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorn...n=JeffChilders

Am watching attorney Jeff Childers right now and his revelations are so helpful to those of us who want to understand attorneys/ our legal community and government.

Dachsie,
Out of curiosity, just wondering if you have a job? It seems like every time I come on to GIM , there are about 20 post from you. How do you find the time ? I usually don’t read a lot of what you post as most of the articles are from well known paid opposition types, . People like Rick Wiles have been around for a long time. I use to be into him and others like Linsey Williams. I started writing down all their predictions, or in Wiles case “visions” and none of them ever came true. I came to the conclusion that all they are doing is “ look at my left hand “ and getting your attention off of what the right hand is doing.
Have you ever read the book, “Come Out Of Her My People”? Now that is something that will open your eyes!
https://isr-messianic.org/publicatio...my-people.html

They also sell the Scriptures where they have replaced the Father and Sons name with the original Hebrew text writing.
https://isr-messianic.org/publicatio...criptures.html
It’s a lot easier to understand who did what or who was who!