-
Re: Coronavirus
Florida Surgeon General: 84% increase in cardiac-related deaths in vaxxed men aged 18-39
The Covid mRNA vaccines have caused a massive increase in cardiac-related deaths among men aged 18 to 39, Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo said on Friday.
The evaluation found that “there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination.”
_____
Dachsie comment:
Could it be that they want to kill off our men of military fighting force age?
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-...tm_source=push
The Quarantine of Health Populations
By Aaron Kheriaty October 11, 2022 History, Public Health 14 minute read
A few weeks ago I had the pleasure of speaking at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles alongside my friend and colleague, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. A month prior, we had also lectured together also at a conference in Rome (which, alas, was not recorded). Fortunately, the LA talks were—link below.
When the COVID-19 pandemic began, Dr. Bhattacharya turned his attention to the epidemiology of the virus and the effects of lockdown policies. He was one of three co-authors—along with Martin Kulldorff of Stanford and Sunetra Gupta of Oxford—of the Great Barrington Declaration. Many more lives would have been saved, and much misery avoided, had we followed the time-tested public health principles laid out in this document. Jay is professor of health policy at Stanford and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. He earned his M.D. and Ph.D. in economics at Stanford.
In recognition of his consequential research focusing on the economics of health care around the world with a particular emphasis on the health and well-being of vulnerable populations, Loyola Marymount University presented him with the 16th Doshi Bridgebuilder Award on September. Named for benefactors Navin and Pratima Doshi, the award is given annually to individuals or organizations dedicated to fostering understanding between cultures, peoples and disciplines.
Upon receipt of the award, Jay gave a lecture exploring “The Economic and Human Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Policy Responses.” I was invited to give a twenty-minute commentary following Jay’s lecture. You can find both talks here (after a long introduction, Jay’s lecture starts at 27:50 and my remarks start at 1:18:30):
I don’t have a transcript of Jay’s talk, but for those who prefer to read rather than watch or listen, here is a longer version of my remarks:
From the lepers in the Old Testament to the Plague of Justinian in Ancient Rome to the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic, covid represents the first time ever in the history of managing pandemics that we quarantined healthy populations. While the ancients did not understand the mechanisms of infectious disease—they knew nothing of viruses and bacteria—they nevertheless figured out many ways to mitigate the spread of contagion during epidemics. These time-tested measures ranged from isolating the symptomatic to enlisting those with natural immunity, who had recovered from the illness, to care for the sick.[i]
Lockdowns were never part of conventional public health measures. In 1968, an estimated one to four million people died in the H2N3 influenza pandemic; businesses and schools stayed open and large events were never cancelled. Until 2020 we had not previously locked down entire populations. We did not do this before because it does not work; and it inflicts enormous collateral damage (as we just heard from my colleague Dr. Bhattacharya).
When Drs. Fauci and Birx, leading the U.S. President’s coronavirus task force, decided in February 2020 that lockdowns were the way to go, the New York Timeswas tasked with explaining this approach to Americans. On February 27, the Timespublished a podcast, which began with science reporter Donald McNeil explaining that civil rights had to be suspended if we were going to stop the spread of covid. The following day, the Times published McNeil’s article, “To Take On the Coronavirus, Go Medieval on It.”[ii]
The article did not give enough credit to Medieval society, which sometimes locked the gates of walled cities or closed borders during epidemics, but never ordered people to stay in their homes, never stopped people from plying their trade, and never isolated asymptomatic individuals. No, Mr. McNeil, lockdowns were not a Medieval throwback but a wholly modern invention. In March of 2020, lockdowns were an entirely de novo experiment, untested on human populations.
Alexis De Tocqueville warned us that democracy contains built-in vulnerabilities that can lead democratic nations to deteriorate into despotism. New levels of political irresponsibility in Europe and America came when we took an authoritarian communist state as the model for managing a pandemic. Recall that China was the birthplace of lockdowns. The first state-ordered lockdown occurred in Wuhan and other Chinese cities.
The Chinese Communist Party advertised that they had stamped out the virus in the regions where they had locked down. This was utterly false advertising, but the WHO and most nations bought it. The U.S. and U.K. followed Italy’s lockdown, which had followed China, and all but a handful of countries around the globe followed our lead. Within weeks the whole world was locked down.
It’s hard to overstate the novelty and folly of what happened worldwide in March of 2020. We were introduced not just to a new and previously untested method of infection control. More than this, we embraced a new paradigm for society—one that had been decades in the making, but that would have been impossible just a few years prior. What descended upon us was not just a novel virus but a novel mode of social organization and control—what I call the biomedical security state, the “New Abnormal”
The term “lockdown” originated not in medicine or public health but the penal system. Prisons go into lockdown to restore order and security when prisoners riot. In situations where the most tightly controlled and surveilled environment on the planet erupts into dangerous chaos, order is restored by asserting swift and complete control of the entire prison population by force. Only strictly surveilled confinement can keep the dangerous and unruly population in check. Prisoners cannot be permitted to riot; inmates cannot run the asylum.
Changes ushered during lockdowns were signs of a broader social and political experiment, “in which a new paradigm of governance over people and things is at play,” in the words of Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben.[iii] This new biosecurity paradigm began to emerge twenty years earlier in the wake of the terrorist attacks in the U.S. on September 11, 2001.
Biomedical security was previously a marginal part of political life and international relations but assumed a central place in political strategies and calculations after these attacks. Already in 2005, for example, the WHO grossly over-predicted that the bird flu (avian influenza) would kill two to fifty million people. To prevent this impending disaster, the WHO made recommendations that no nation was prepared to accept at the time, which included the proposal of population-wide lockdowns.
Even earlier, in 2001, Richard Hatchett, a CIA member who served on George W. Bush’s National Security Council, was already recommending obligatory confinement of the entire population in response to biological threats. Dr. Hatchett now directs the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), an influential entity coordinating global vaccine investment in close collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry, the World Economic Forum (WEF), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Like many other public health officials, today Hatchett regards the fight against Covid-19 as a “war,” on the analogy to the war on terror.[iv]
Although lockdowns and other biosecurity proposals were circulating by 2005, mainstream public health did not embrace the biosecurity model until covid. Donald Henderson, who died in 2016, was a giant in the field of epidemiology and public health. He was also a man whose prophetic warnings in 2006 we chose to ignore in 2020. Dr. Henderson directed the ten-year international effort from 1967–1977 that successfully eradicated smallpox, then served 20 years as Dean of Public Health at Johns Hopkins. Toward the end of his career, Henderson worked on national programs for public health preparedness and response following biological attacks and national disasters.
In 2006, Henderson and his colleagues published a landmark paper.[v] This article reviewed what was known about the effectiveness and practical feasibility of a range of actions that might be taken in response to a respiratory virus pandemic. This included a review of proposed biosecurity measures—later utilized for the first time during covid—including “large scale or home quarantine of people believed to have been exposed, travel restrictions, prohibitions of social gatherings, school closures, maintaining personal distance, and the use of masks”. Even assuming an infection fatality rate of 2.5%, roughly equal to the 1918 Spanish flu but far higher than the IFR for covid, Henderson and his colleagues nevertheless concluded that all these mitigation measures would do far more harm than good.
Henderson and his colleagues concluded their review by endorsing this traditional principle of good public health: “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.” Quite obviously, we did not heed any of this advice in March of 2020. We instead forged ahead with lockdowns, masks, school closures, social distancing, and the rest. When faced with covid, we rejected time-tested principles of public health and embraced instead the untested biosecurity model.
According to the biosecurity paradigm, a kind of overbearing medical terror was deemed necessary to deal with worst-case scenarios, whether for naturally occurring pandemics or biological weapons. Drawing on the work of French historian of medicine Patrick Zylberman, we can summarize the characteristics of the emerging biosecurity model, in which the political recommendations had three basic characteristics:
measures were formulated based on possible risk in a hypothetical scenario, with data presented to promote behavior permitting management of an extreme situation;
“worst case” logic was adopted as a key element of political rationality;
a systematic organization of the entire body of citizens was required to reinforce adhesion to the institutions of government as much as possible.
The intended result was a sort of super civic spirit, with imposed obligations presented as demonstrations of altruism. Under such control, citizens no longer have a right to health safety; instead, health is imposed on them as a legal obligation (biosecurity).[vi]
This precisely describes the pandemic strategy we adopted in 2020.
Lockdowns were formulated based on discredited worst-case-scenario modeling from the Imperial College London.
This failed model predicted 2.2 million immediate deaths in the U.S.
Consequently, the entire body of citizens, as a manifestation of civic spirit, gave up freedoms and rights that were not relinquished even by the citizens of London during the bombing of the city in World War II (London adopted curfews but never locked down).
The new imposition of health as a legal obligation—biomedical security—was accepted with little resistance. Even now, for many citizens it seems not to matter that these impositions failed to deliver the public health outcomes that were promised.
The full significance of what transpired in 2020 may have escaped our attention. Perhaps without realizing it, we lived through the design and implementation of not just a novel pandemic strategy but a new political paradigm. This system is far more effective at controlling populations than anything previously attempted by Western nations. Under this novel biosecurity model, “the total cessation of every form of political activity and social relationship [became] the ultimate act of civic participation.”[vii]Quite the contradiction.
Neither the pre-war Fascist government in Italy nor the Communist nations of the Eastern Bloc ever dreamed of implementing such restrictions. Social distancing became a political model, the new paradigm for social interactions, “with a digital matrix replacing human interaction, which by definition from now on will be regarded as fundamentally suspicious and politically ‘contagious’.”[viii]
It is instructive to reflect on the chosen term, social distancing, which is not a medical term but a political one. A medical or scientific paradigm would have deployed a term like physical distancing or personal distancing, but not socialdistancing. The word social communicates that this is a new model for organizing society, one that limits human interactions by six feet of space and masks that cover the face—our locus of interpersonal connection and communication. The six-foot distancing rule was supposedly premised on the spread of covid through respiratory droplets, though the practice continued even after it became clear that it spread through aerosolized mechanisms.
Actual contagion risk depended on the total time spent in a room with an infected person and was mitigated by opening windows and other methods of improved ventilation, not by staying six feet apart. Plastic protective barriers erected everywhere actually increased the risk of viral spread by impeding good ventilation. We had already been psychologically primed for over a decade to accept pseudo-scientific practices of social distancing by using digital devices to limit human interactions.
The myth of asymptomatic viral spread was another key element in our adoption of the biosecurity paradigm. Asymptomatic spread was not a driver of the pandemic, as research confirmed.[ix] Given that no respiratory virus in history has been known to spread asymptomatically, this should not have surprised anyone. But the media ran with the hypothetical asymptomatic threat story. The specter of people with no symptoms being potentially dangerous—which never had any scientific basis—turned every fellow citizen into a possible threat to one’s existence.
Notice the complete reversal that this effected in our thinking about health and illness. In the past, a person was assumed to be healthy until proven sick. If one missed work for a prolonged period, one needed a note from a doctor establishing an illness. During covid, the criteria was turned upside-down: we began to assume that people were sick until proven healthy. One needed a negative covid test to return to work.
It would be hard to devise a better method than the widespread myth of asymptomatic spread, combined with the practice of confining the healthy, to destroy the fabric of society and to divide us. People who are afraid of everyone, who are locked down, who are isolated for months behind screens, are easier to control. A society grounded on “social distancing” is a manifest contradiction—it’s a kind of anti-society.
Consider what happened to us—consider the human and spiritual goods we sacrificed to preserve bare life at all costs: friendships, holidays with family, work, visiting and providing the sacraments to the sick and dying, worshipping God, burying the dead. Physical human presence was confined to the enclosure of domestic walls, and even that was discouraged: in the U.S. state governors and our president attempted to prohibit or at least strongly discouraged family holiday gatherings.
In those dizzying days of 2020, we lived through the swift and sustained abolition of public spaces and the squeezing even of private ones. Ordinary human contact—our most basic human need, was redefined as contagion—a threat to our existence.
We already knew that social isolation could kill. Loneliness and social fragmentation were endemic in the West even prior to the coronavirus pandemic. As Nobel Prize winning Princeton researchers Ann Case and Angus Deaton had demonstrated, these factors were contributing to rising rates of deaths of despair—death by suicide, drugs, and alcohol related illnesses. Deaths of despair rose dramatically during lockdowns, which poured gasoline on that fire.
Since the 1980s, reported loneliness among adults in the U.S. increased from 20 percent to 40 percent even before the pandemic. Loneliness is associated with increased risk of heart disease, stroke, premature death, and violence. It affects health in ways comparable to smoking or obesity, increasing a whole host of health risks and decreasing life expectancy. It is no accident that one of the most severe punishments we inflict on prisoners is solitary confinement—a condition that eventually leads to sensory disintegration and psychosis. As we hear on the first pages of Sacred Scripture, “it is not good for man to be alone.” But with the acquiescence of the Church, during lockdowns we embraced and actively promoted what philosopher Hannah Arendt called “organized loneliness,” a social state she identified as a precondition for totalitarianism in her seminal book, The Origins of Totalitarianism.[x]
Consider for example the “Alone Together” public service announcement produced for the U.S. government in March of 2020.[xi] The ad read, “Staying home saves lives. Whether you have Covid-19 or not, stay home! We’re in this together. #AloneTogether.” The very conjunction of these two words, a manifest contradiction, is enough to demonstrate the absurdity. Besides not actually saving lives, being told that we were fulfilling a social duty by being alone did not mitigate any of the adverse consequences of loneliness. A hashtag where we could be “alone together” on screens was no remedy.
Lockdowns were the first and decisive step in our embrace of the biomedical security state. This continued with forced vaccinations & discriminatory vaccine passports, mandated for novel products with minimal safety and efficacy testing.
The resultant carnage—some of which Dr. Bhattacharya has summarized—was not, as many news reports misleadingly suggested, collateral damage inflicted by coronavirus. No, this was collateral damage inflicted by our policy response to the coronavirus. Unless we learn from these policy failures we will be doomed to repeat them.
[i] Harper, K. The Fate of Rome: Climate, disease, and the End of an Empire. Princeton University Press, 2019.
[ii] McNeil, D. “To Take On the Coronavirus, Go Medieval on It ,” New York Times, February 28, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/s...uarantine.html
[iii] Agamben, G. (2021). “Biosecurity and Politics.” Strategic Culture.
[iv] Escobar, P. (2021). “How Biosecurity Is Enabling Digital Neo-Feudalism.” Strategic Culture.
[v] Inglesby, T; Henderson, D.A.; et al., “Disease Mitigation Measures in the Control of Pandemic Influenza,” Control of Pandemic Influenza,” Biosecurity and Terrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2006;4(4):366-75. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2006.4.366. PMID: 17238820
[vi] Agamben, G. (2021). “Biosecurity and Politics.” Strategic Culture.
[vii] Ibid.
[viii] Escobar, P. (2021). “How Biosecurity Is Enabling Digital Neo-Feudalism.” Strategic Culture.
[ix] Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini IM Jr, Halloran ME, Dean NE. “Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” JAMA Network Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31756. PMID: 33315116; PMCID: PMC7737089.
Cao, S., Gan, Y., Wang, C. et al. “Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China.” Nature Communications 11, 5917 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w
[x] Arendt, H. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New Ed. with Added Prefaces, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1973, p. 478.
[xi] “Covid-19 PSA – Alone Together – Youtube,” May 24, 2020:
Reprinted from the author’s Substack
Author
Aaron Kheriaty
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://brownstone.org/articles/covi...tm_source=push
Covid Fraud: A Staggering $600 Billion
https://brownstone.org/wp-content/up...36-800x469.jpg
By James Bovard October 11, 2022
[SIZE=3]COVID fraud is at this point a redundant phrase. Congress appropriated more than $5 trillion for COVID relief but almost $600 billion may have been lost to fraud — an astounding 12%. Washington’s pandemic pratfalls are the greatest federal boondoggle of this century.
Prosecutors are having a turkey shoot nailing COVID crooks: More than 1,500 have been indicted and almost 500 have been convicted. On September 14, the Justice Department announced the creation of three COVID-19 fraud strike force teams.
When President Biden recently signed a law to extend the time to prosecute COVID fraud, he declared, “My message to those cheats out there is this: You can’t hide. We’re going to find you.” But the sheer amount of fraud makes it unlikely that the vast majority of thieves will be charged.
Policymakers acted as if waiving standard federal fraud protections would somehow thwart the COVID virus. On September 22, the Labor Department inspector general estimated that COVID-19 unemployment fraud amounted to $45 billion and could exceed $163 billion.
“Overseas organized crime groups flooded state unemployment systems with bogus online claims, overwhelming antiquated computer software benefits in blunt-force attacks that siphoned out millions of dollars,” NBC News reported.
Prison inmates, drug gangs and Nigerian racketeers easily plundered the program. One swindler collected unemployment benefits from 29 different states. In the first year of the pandemic, Maryland detected more than 1.3 million fraudulent unemployment claims — equal to 20% of the state’s population
Beginning in June 2020, the feds distributed $813 billion in Paycheck Protection Program loans to businesses. President Donald Trump’s Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin boasted that PPP is “supporting an estimated 50 million jobs.” But many of those jobs existed solely in the imagination of political appointees.
The Small Business Administration (SBA), which administered the program, effectively told people, “Apply and sign and tell us that you’re really entitled to the money,” according to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz. The SBA camouflaged its “don’t ask, don’t tell” loan standard by claiming to perform economic miracles. The SBA ludicrously boasted that PPP loans saved more jobs than the total number of employees in at least 15 industries.
Yet CBS News found that PPP loans had gone to more than a thousand “ghost businesses” in Markham, Illinois — indicative of a nationwide problem of deluging non-existent companies with federal cash. The feds gave “loans to 342 people who said their name was ‘N/A,’” the New York Times reported.
Fraud permeated relief programs of practically every federal agency that gushered money. On September 20, the feds charged 47 people in Minnesota with looting $250 million from the federal child nutrition programs’ COVID aid. Prosecutors denounced the “brazen scheme of staggering proportions” but federal and state bureaucrats should have stopped the pilfering from the start. “Feeding Our Future,” a nonprofit organization, pocketed $300,000 in subsidies in 2018 and a windfall of almost $200 million in 2021. Fraud snowballed because the US Department of Agriculture issued waivers to “suspend all on-site monitoring of providers” of children’s meals.
Instead of feeding hungry kids, tax dollars were pilfered using a list of phony recipients generated by the website listofrandomnames.com. (No wonder Feeding Our Future wasn’t invited to attend Biden’s White House Summit on Hunger last week.) When the state of Minnesota sought to cut off funding, Feeding Our Future sued, claiming the action “discriminated against a nonprofit that worked with racial minorities,” the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported. Leftist firebrand Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) received thousands of dollars in donations from individuals indicted in the scandal.
Fighting fraud is tricky for federal investigators when some politicians openly used COVID stimulus money to bribe voters. In the January 2021 Georgia runoff race for US Senate, the campaign of Democratic candidate Raphael Warnock distributed fliers declaring, “Want a $2,000 Check? Vote Warnock.” That promise helped Warnock win, sealing Democratic control of the Senate and opening the floodgates for trillions of dollars of additional Biden administration spending.
The single biggest COVID fraud will never show up in triumphal press releases issued by federal prosecutors. On August 24, Biden invoked the COVID-19 emergency to justify canceling $400 billion in student loans. A few weeks ago, Biden told “60 Minutes” that the pandemic was over — thus invalidating his justification for loan forgiveness.
But Team Biden signaled that it was entitled to spend hundreds of billions of tax dollars to purchase Democratic votes in the midterm congressional elections regardless of the president’s admission.
Plenty of scoundrels will be convicted in the coming months for stealing COVID money. But it was the politicians of both parties who unleashed the reckless spending that left us with a soaring national debt, roaring inflation, and a fading mirage of prosperity.
Americans should never permit politicians to absolve themselves by uncorking geysers of tax dollars.
Reposted with author permission from NYPost[/SIZE]
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.americaoutloud.com/big-p...ty-violations/
Big Pharma Insiders Reveal Shocking Insight on Vaccine Safety Violations
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP, GLP, GCP, GDP) standards and pharmacovigilance oversight have been flagrantly ignored by the SARS-CoV-2 injection manufacturers, and FDA, EMA, and MHRA have waved the evil jabs through to the public, which is horrifying. The catastrophic death and disability happening to people around the world after receiving the COVID shots is directly related to US, European, and other countries’ regulators completely abdicating their safety and quality oversight function and duty to the public.
Truth for Health Foundation Whistleblower Report team reveals shocking information from BIG Pharma career insiders that are urgent for the public to understand – the information you take time to read NOW may save your life! The latest publication by Alexandra Latypova on Trial Site News exposes several staggering conclusions about safety violations that apply in particular to the largest scale “production” batches.
> Not a single vial tested had ingredients or doses that conformed to labeling requirements.
> Some vials contained NO mRNA, and others contained massive doses far exceeding stated amounts…is this a cause of “sudden death” soon after vaccination?
> 10,000 % variability in potency.
> Frozen vaccines delivered to vaccination centers in the UNFINISHED state, which means “finishing” procedures had to be carried out on sites that were not equipped to do safely and properly.
Based on documents received from FOIA requests, the implausible scale of Pfizer mRNA manufacturing shows lot size shipments in the United States of up to 12 million doses, which means 900 liters of product per batch! Experts in manufacturing and distribution conclude that Pfizer is either combining batches, diluting to an unprecedented degree, relabeling older products, or something even more fraudulent since there is no way with current production capacity to reach that scale of production and maintain reliable safety or quality.
Whistleblowers conclude that the criminal enterprises involved with these experimental mRNA shots don’t seem to care what people get injected with, and are knowingly and intentionally lying. With these new revelations, it is unsurprising that these COVID shots have been ineffective in preventing COVID illness in those who received them. As one said, “Dose to dose lack of conformity is terrible at any time, but with an experimental product like this, it is at the nastiest end of pharma abuses.”
The even more ominous concern is the severe injuries and skyrocketing deaths seen worldwide in all age groups after the COVID shots. Doctors are still trying to determine how this occurs and why there is such individual variability in how damage occurs in people. Partial explanations may lie in the over 10,000% variability in potency among the vials tested.
And then there is this stunning revelation from pharma insider, Hedley Rees from the UK: “Over a period of 40 years, Big Pharma has outsourced every physical activity it possibly could, until it has lost its ability to develop new drugs—drug development, manufacture, and distribution is now in the hands of third party organisations.”
In his INSIDE PHARMA article, Mr. Rees explains: THE ONE THING BIG PHARMA CAN’T OUTSOURCE—CULPABILITY. This extract is key: “Outsourcing manufacture can work so long as the development process and control are in the hands of the developer and the developer allows detailed instructions and specifications to be handed down to contractors and suppliers.”
Hedley goes on to give examples of the outsourcing of critical phases of drug and vaccine development, manufacturing, research, and distribution:
Contract Development and Manufacturing Organisations (CDMOs). Examples include Lonza, Catalent Pharma Solutions, and Oxford BioMedica (AZ vaccine).
Contract Research Organisations (CROs): Examples include IQVIA, Parexel, and ICON (CRO to Pfizer, appointed Ventavia as site management organisation where whistleblower Brook Jackson worked).
Wholesale distributors. Examples include McKesson, Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen.
Another key point is the frozen vaccines (Pfizer/c) are a gross breach of GMP, see INSIDE PHARMA: DIY FROZEN JABS BROKE PHARMACEUTICAL LAW
Their analysis of the dangerous and potentially life-threatening violations of safety and quality oversight in the development, manufacturing and distribution of these mRNA gene therapy shots, and other pharmaceutical products, is a critical wake up call to ALL Americans that we must hold our tax-payer funded regulatory agencies accountable for their gross failures to protect an unsuspecting public.
Listen to the podcast with the following Whistleblowers below entitled:
FDA’s Catastrophic Safety and Quality Oversight Failures on COVID Vaccines
Adding credibility to the shocking revelations from our Whistleblowers is their extensive backgrounds as Pharma insiders:
Alexandra Latypova has a career in research, toxicology, analysis, and research design. She is a former pharmaceutical research and development executive who co-founded and managed several contract research organizations in pharmaceutical clinical trials. She worked for sixty major pharmaceutical clients, including Pfizer. These pharmaceutical clients were her research and development partner. The area of her focus has been safety assessments, what was done in the Covid shots, especially what Pfizer tried to cover up. She looks at not only the safety assessments but regulatory compliance and has interacted with the FDA and worked on FDA and Industry consortiums who are putting together the approaches proper approaches to clinical trials. Follow her research and publications on www.trialsitenews.com.
Hedley Rees, based in the United Kingdom. Mr. Rees has been providing consultancy on the development, manufacture and distribution of drugs that are fully compliant with the GMP requirements of 21 CFR Title 21, since 2005 through his company, PharmaFlow. Prior to that, he spent 16 years in senior roles in Big Pharma (Bayer) and 10 years in biotech (British Biotech, Vernalis and OSI Pharmaceuticals (now Astellas). Mr. Rees also authored Supply Chain Management in the Drug Industry: Delivering Patient Value for Pharmaceuticals and Biologics for Wiley, NJ in 2011. His expertise is in the area of anything to do with manufacture through the three phases of clinical trials (and preclinical if required) and ongoing distribution of the commercial supply. Follow Hedley Rees on his Substack column, INSIDE PHARMA, where he shares all he can to expose the lies and deceptions that are costing lives and jeopardizing public safety. Watch his interview here.
Janci C. Lindsay, PhD., Toxicologist, Molecular Biologist. Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology, Toxicology Support Services, LLC. Dr. Lindsay is a Toxicologist and Molecular Biologist with over 30 years of scientific research experience. She regularly consults as an expert witness in legal matters relating to the toxicity of chemicals, biologics and particulates as well as consults on biologic mechanism of action pathways in varying cancers and lung disease. She regularly researchers and warns about the potential for acute and long-term reproductive toxicity of these shots and is known for her early and public warnings to the CDC ACIP committee that these shots could “sterilize an entire generation”.
Michael Yeadon, PhD, Former Pfizer Chief Scientist Worldwide, Respiratory Pharmacology and product development. Dr. Mike Yeadon is now one of the few senior pharma executives speaking out about the dangers of the experimental COVID shots. Dr. Yeadon has a thirty-year career in research and development and product development. He has been a courageous Whistleblower since fall of 2020 warning about the damage to pregnancy development with the spike protein similarity to critical placental proteins needed to establish and maintain pregnancy. He is Chief Scientific Advisor to Truth for Health Foundation and has testified as an expert in vaccine damage in international, UK and US courts.
DrLee4America
DrLee4America
Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD is President and CEO of Truth for Health Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public charity (www.TruthForHealth.org) advocating for early COVID home-based treatment
by DrLee4America | Oct 11, 2022
-
Re: Coronavirus
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://planettoday.substack.com/p/u...m_source=email
University Medical Students Must Take Oath To Fight ‘White Supremacy and Gender Binary’
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...2_678x381.jpeg
Planet Today
Oct 10, 2022
Updating daily: Daily updates on UFO sightings, conspiracies, political, geopolitical, medicine and everything crazy and weird. (Planet-Today)
University Medical Students Must Take Oath To Fight ‘White Supremacy and Gender Binary’
Planet Today
Oct 11
SAVE
University Medical Students Must Take Oath To Fight ‘White Supremacy and Gender Binary’
Medical students at the University of Minnesota must now take an oath to “honor all Indigenous ways of healing that have been historically marginalized by Western medicine” and fight “white supremacy, colonialism, [and] the gender binary.”
Share Planet Today
The University of Minnesota Medical School (UMMS) class of 2026 recited an oath during the white coat ceremony that included pledges to dedicate their careers to activist causes including anti-racism, climate advocacy, and the LGBTQ+ agenda.
A handout provided at the ceremony indicated the oath was written by the oath writing committee, which is comprised of 15 medical students enrolled in the class.
Students began the woke oath by chanting, “Our institution is located on Dakota land…We commit to uprooting the legacy and perpetuation of structural violence deeply embedded within the health care system.”
“We recognize the inequities built by past and present traumas rooted in white supremacy, colonialism, the gender binary, ableism, and all other forms of oppression,” the oath continued.
Medical students at the University of Minnesota must now take an oath to "honor all Indigenous ways of healing that have been historically marginalized by Western medicine" and fight "white supremacy, colonialism, [and] the gender binary." pic.twitter.com/DSiQz9BUx8
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 9, 2022
Here’s the program from University of Minnesota’s white coat ceremony for the incoming class. You’ll notice that the closing is from the “Vice Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” Ana Núñez who—wait for it—specializes in “gender medicine.” pic.twitter.com/jwibk6KTiD
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) October 9, 2022
Campus Reform report: UMMS Media Relations Manager Kat Dodge said that “[i]t is a common practice at medical schools in the United States to build upon the intent of the Hippocratic Oath to promote humility, integrity, and beneficence.”
“Each year at the University of Minnesota Medical School, the incoming students work with faculty to write an oath that reflects these core elements, values, and ethics the class aspires to uphold,” Dodge explained.
The medical students pledged “to honor all Indigenous ways of healing” that are “historically marginalized by Western medicine.”
UMMS students also committed to climate advocacy stating, “health is intimately connected to our environment, we commit to healing our planet and communities.”
“In light of [the white coats’ Heal] legacy as a symbol of power, prestige, and dominance, we strive to reclaim their identity as a symbol of responsibility, humility, and loving-kindness,” the oath concluded.
______________
Dachsie comment:
Sorry to veer from the topic a bit, but not much.
SOFT Kill OATH for present and future doctors and present and future hospitals. The state of Oregon abandoned the Hippocratic Oath a long time ago and Oregon doctors and hospitals murder with loving-kindness, aka legal euthanasia or valid informed consent or valid Do Not Resusitate DNR forms)
No state funding to go to any of these medical universities and no federal funding should go to any of these states and universities.
One suggestion for we the people -- nevermind.
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://planettoday.substack.com/p/b...m_source=email
BREAKING: Pfizer Director Admits Vaccine was Never Tested on Preventing Transmission
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/...2560x1393.jpeg
During EU Hearing Contrary to What was Previously Advertised (VIDEO)
Planet Today
1 hr ago
BREAKING: Pfizer Director Admits Vaccine was Never Tested on Preventing Transmission During EU Hearing Contrary to What was Previously Advertised (VIDEO)
During the COVID-19 EU hearing, Pfizer’s president of international developed markets, Janine Small, admitted that the vaccine had never been tested on its ability to prevent transmission, contrary to what was previously advertised.
Share Planet Today
Robert “Rob” Roos, a politician from the Netherlands who is also a member of the European Parliament, exposed the lie that people from all over the world had been led to believe.
“If you don’t get vaccinated, you’re antisocial. This is what the Dutch prime minister and health minister told us. You don’t get vaccinated just for yourself, but also for others. You do it for all of society, that’s what they said. Today, this turned out to be complete nonsense. ” Roos said in his viral bombshell video posted on Twitter.
“In a COVID hearing in the European Parliament, one of the Pfizer directors just admitted to me at the time of introduction, the vaccine had never been tested on stopping the transmission of the virus,” Roos said.
In one of the most atrocious crimes against humanity, all the government officials worked together with big pharma to deceive the general public into taking the COVID shot.
They lied to us. They coerced millions of people into being vaccinated on the lie of preventing transmission.
“This removed the entire legal basis for the covert passport. The COVID passport that led to massive institutional discrimination as people lost access to essential parts of society. I find this to be shocking, even criminal,” Roos added.
During the hearing, when asked by Ross if the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market, Janine Small responded while smiling:
“Regarding the question around did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market? No. We have to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.”
Watch the video below:
�� BREAKING:
In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission.
"Get vaccinated for others" was always a lie.
The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.
The world needs to know. Share this video! ⤵️ pic.twitter.com/su1WqgB4dO
— Rob Roos MEP ���� (@Rob_Roos) October 11, 2022
Remember when the globalists and elites told us to take the vaccine to stop the transmission? This is scandalous.
Watch the video below:
https://youtu.be/hp9xhOYlrEA video url
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ature=emb_logo
-
Re: Coronavirus
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/inje...ystem-1ed1a4cd
Injecting Children with the mRNA COVID Gene Injection or Any of the COVID Injections Can be Very Damaging to Their Developing Innate Immune System
Paul Alexander, PhD
Evidence-based medicine researcher, a professor university at The UNITY Project, C19 collaborator, consultant
Oct. 10, 2022, 8:00 a.m.
Before I unfold this offering, a critical point must be tabled. This is that we have underestimated the evolutionary biology and the dynamics at play between the COVID virus (coronavirus, respiratory virus) and the resulting immune response from the population, either via natural infection or vaccine. Those making decisions have disregarded the evolutionary capacity of the virus to adapt and evolve due to the population immune pressure (mounting). This is especially if the immune response is sub-optimal and immature with immune fixation and priming (prejudice) that has induced vaccinal antibodies that do not neutralize the antigen (in this case, Wuhan vaccine spike antibodies facing omicron BA.5 spike/clade). This interplay and dance between virus and host immune system should have been the cardinal issue on day one, for today, we are faced with infectious variant after infectious variant due to the non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing vaccine (vaccinal antibodies) that do not stop infection or transmission, placing the spike and binding domains under massive Darwinian selection pressure to select for the more ‘fitter’ infectious variants. The danger is that we can drive the emergence of a more virulent lethal sub-variant clade.
The COVID pandemic would have been over, yet it is continuing to expand due to the use of the existing non-neutralizing COVID injections that do not stop infection, replication, or transmission, and in fact, drive emergence of infectious sub-variants (and a potentially virulent/lethal one). The Omicron virus (sub-variants) is largely resistant to the potentially neutralizing and non-neutralizing antigen-specific, vaccine induced antibodies (Abs).
First, this COVID gene injection must be stopped! It has failed and is ineffective and harmful. There is no other way for me to say it other than it must be stopped. The vaccine is driving massive infectious pressure and keeping the virus circulating. Ultimately, vaccinated persons are becoming infected and spreading the virus. It is that simple and ominous. Very early on I wrote a review in Brownstone showing that there was no difference between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated and that the vaccine was failing.
Omicron is the latest variant (and it’s subvariants/clades) since the initial Wuhan legacy strain (some estimates are that the initial emergence could be sometime late 2018 and early to mid-2019) and has evolved into a mild ‘common cold’ sub-variant (BA.4 & BA.5) that one can argue could become (or already is) endemic and circulate seasonally as a common cold like coronavirus (e.g., OC43 and 229E common cold coronaviruses.) However, the high specificity and largely resistant, vaccinal Abs are placing the spike glyco-protein (binding sites such as the receptor binding domain and the N-terminal domain) of the SARS-CoV-2 virus under sub-optimal immune pressure. This pressure on the spike is causing the selection (via Darwinian natural selection) of more infectious (evolutionary fittest) variants that could overcome the pressure with viral immune escape (antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADEI) as well as antibody-dependent enhancement of disease (ADED) and original antigenic sin (whereby there is immune fixation or immune locking or priming or prejudicing based on the initial prime or exposure).
The result is that those who are vaccinated are at enhanced risk of infection (due to infection-enhancing vaccinal antibodies), and those who are not vaccinated have benefitted from infection-mediated training of innate cell-mediated immunity (the training, education, and instructing of the innate immunity and the critical role of the innate antibodies in this training). This training is based on massive infectious pressure. Theoretically, this pandemic can continue for many years if the use of these sub-optimal non-neutralizing gene injections is not stopped. Infectious variant after infection variant will emerge, and a potentially infectious variant that is more virulent and severe will result.
i)Liu et al. “An infectivity-enhancing site on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein targeted by antibodies”
ii)Fantini & Yahi et al. “Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?
While there was some protection of the upper respiratory airways in the pre-Omicron era, with the exiting (dominant) Omicron sub-variants (BA.4 & BA.5) that are largely resistant to vaccinal neutralizing antibodies, the vaccinated persons have become more susceptible to infection, and we are witnessing more virulent variants becoming dominant (Omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5). “Neutralization experiments revealed that the immunity induced by BA.1 and BA.2 infections is less effective against BA.4/5. Cell culture experiments showed that BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/5 replicate more efficiently in human alveolar epithelial cells than BA.2, and particularly, BA.4/5 is more fusogenic than BA.2.” Importantly, virulence-neutralizing antibodies (Abs) (these are the same as those enhancing/facilitating infection at the upper respiratory tract) still protect against severe disease in the vaccinated person (e.g., in the case of BA.1 and BA.2) in the lower respiratory tract. However, it is very likely that with the growing resistance of BA.4 and BA.5 clades to the virulence-neutralizing Abs, then vaccinated persons will quickly become more susceptible to virulence. This is a major concern.
Widespread asymptomatic transmission in highly vaccinated nations and the subsequent rise in infectious pressure (due to circulating virus in the midst of the pandemic) is causing infection-mediated immunity in certain subsets of the population to no longer suffice to prevent productive infection. As a result, we are seeing a rise in the global spread of a number of acute, self-limiting microbial infections (e.g., ‘seasonal’ flu, RSV but also vaccine-preventable viral and bacterial infections in countries that interrupted their childhood vax program due to Covid crisis) and also of some acute, self-limiting viral diseases (e.g., monkeypox, potentially pandemic [avian H5N1] flu). In addition, depletion (and immune exhaustion) of cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells due to repetitive cycles of re-infection has also led to an increased recurrence/reactivation rate of chronic infections (e.g., herpetic diseases, CMV, EBV, CMV, HIV, tuberculosis etc.) and relapse or metastasis of certain cancers in vaccinees.
What are we saying about these COVID injections (mass vaccination) for children?
A rapid mass vaccination campaign that utilizes a sub-optimal, antigen-specific non-neutralizing vaccine (such as the COVID vaccines) across all age groups in the pandemic (in the midst of an active pandemic of a highly mutable and highly infectious respiratory virus with high infectious pressure) can only generate a continued series of dominating new variants that are increasingly infectious, increasingly vaccine-resistant (due to “immune escape”), and inevitably more virulent (potentially lethal). In short, the mass vaccination campaign that has been implemented during the COVID pandemic can potentially keep the pandemic going for many years with the potential of more virulent sub-variants emerging.
Importantly, children bring statistical zero risk of severe illness or death from this COVID virus, and this was the same across near 3 years. The data is stable. In the US, as well as in Sweden and Germany, no healthy child has died from COVID due to being infected, in nearly 3 years. Not one! This is the data the media will not tell you. The immune system of children needs to be educated and trained for life-long optimal functionality. The vaccine implementation will damage and subvert the initiation of education and instruction of the innate immune system in children (the first line of immunological defense). It is critical that you as parents understand this.
Parents must understand that when the COVID injection is given to young children, this (the vaccinal antibodies that are induced due to the vaccine) prevents the child’s innate antibodies from eliminating the virus confronted with now, and prevents the active training and teaching of the innate immune effector cells on how to recognize (glycosylated) viruses and distinguish them from “self” antigens (i.e., distinguish between “self” and “non-self.”). There is a critical window of training for any immune system to learn at an early stage of life (once passive maternal immune protection is no longer available e.g., at about 4 to 6 months post birth) to provide for a healthy and appropriate immune response, immediate and life-long. This interference with the initiating foundational education of a child’s developing innate immune system can cause a COVID-vaccinated child to be less capable of handling glycosylated viruses (and glycosylated pathogens in general, as well as a range of pathogen). This predisposes such children to immune pathology (e.g., autoimmune disease).
I end by appealing to parents that under no condition, do you vaccinate your healthy child with these non-neutralizing COVID injections since your child brings near zero risk to the table, and the vaccine has failed and is ineffective. It also skews to harm. Thus, please do not inject your healthy child with these COVID gene injections. Dr. Francis Collins, Dr. Fauci, Dr. Walensky, no one, no NIH, FDA, CDC or NIAID or PHAC or Health Canada or SAGE official or government official has made the case as to why your healthy child is to be vaccinated with these failed, harmful COVID gene injections. Not one! Do not do it!
__________
Dachsie comment:
Same song, second verse. Nevertheless, a life-or-death important message.
IF these COVID injections being offered for the Coronavirus and the COVID 19 disease are indeed "failed, harmful gene injections", why are they not officially contraindicated or advised against for ALL human beings, young or old, healthy or not healthy?
-
Re: Coronavirus
To read any of the articles listed below, click on HERE to get links to each article.
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...e-52f8708741e3
Exclusive: Healthy Police Officer Contemplated Suicide After Pfizer Booster Injuries
Men Under 40 at High Risk of Cardiac-Related Death After mRNA COVID Vaccines, Florida Analysis Shows
Even Kaiser Admits It — Your Risk of Getting COVID Increases With Each Shot
Government’s ‘Privatized Censorship Regime’ Violates First Amendment, Legal Expert Says
How to Prepare for the Coming Water Wars
GMO Purple Tomatoes Just Moved One Step Closer to Grocery Shelves — Should You Buy Them?
We Can Win This ... But Only If We Step Up Our Game. Donate Today!
Antiviral Purchased by U.K. Government Does Not Lower Risk of Hospital Admission, Trial Shows + More
Amazon ‘Suicide Kits’ Led to Teen Deaths, According to New Lawsuit + More
-
Re: Coronavirus
Dachsie comment:
I posted a few days ago on this but here is the original video on this.
I think the expression is...
This is rich!
_______________________
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TXX0acEIUPcc/
https://static-3.bitchute.com/live/c...cc_320x180.jpg
Pfizer director admits vaccine was untested at time of introduction - FULL RESPONSE
2:27 video runtime
Banned Youtube Videos
specializedtom
38699 subscribers
Here is the full response to the question posed to the Pfizer director. As you will see, it not only doesn't change the context of the answer in the previous video, she also incriminates Dr. Bourla (the CEO of Pfizer) in her statement.
Category Health & Medical
______________
https://markcrispinmiller.substack.c...m_source=email
Oct 12, 2022
So all that blather about "doing it for others," and getting "vaccinated" as "an act of love," was just one more Big Lie. Now, will "our free press" report this, or keep lying?
Mark Crispin Miller
______________________
https://twitter.com/Rob_Roos/status/1579759795225198593
Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Rob Roos MEP ����
@Rob_Roos
�� BREAKING:
In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission.
"Get vaccinated for others" was always a lie.
The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated.
The world needs to know. Share this video!
2:01 embedded video runtime (same as Bitchute vdeo above)
https://twitter.com/i/status/1579759795225198593
