-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
https://theamericanview.com/blogs/news/what-is-the-solution-to-abortion?_pos=1&_sid=5e3544f4e&_ss=r
What Is the Solution to Abortion?
by Jake and Dominic MacAulay
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...hdb2G5eOpw--~D
https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/z1wHDCK6yfA/sddefault.webp
embedded video
4:45 video runtime
also on YouTube Here
Following the recent series of debates, the issue of child abortion has once again resurfaced. Continuing the usual trend of conservative rhetoric, the Republican party is, in speech and theory, opposed to abortion, promising to bring a swift end to the practice.
Such promises have developed an association between Republicans and pro-life decisions, prompting many people to blindly vote for anyone sporting the Republican title. However, it would appear that these righteous and constitutional promises have all been made without the proper action to support them.
Sure, some minor oppositions to abortion have come from these candidates, but there has really been no concrete change. Abortion is still assumed and carried out under the color of law.
This normalization of a criminal act that directly defies the words, “all men are created equal,” largely began with the Supreme Court opinion in Roe v. Wade which is now confused as law. The decision of the Supreme Court to ignore the written law and pretend to overrule its writing has resulted in the unborn’s right to life being completely disregarded in the public eye.
But does the Supreme Court’s opinion even carry legal weight outside of that particular case?
Well, there are two reasons that it absolutely does not. First, the Supreme Court has a very specific duty: Apply the law. The Constitution specifically designates “All legislative Powers” to be given to Congress leaving no lawmaking authority to the Judicial branch.
The second reason is that any law made in addition to the Constitution cannot exist in contradiction to its basic principles. The 5th amendment to the Constitution states that no person shall “be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” This judicial opinion is an act of direct contradiction to an affirmed right which is given by God and protected by the Government, rendering it void in the legal realm.
So, if this opinion from the courts is not even legal to begin with, why is it still treated as so despite the Republican party holding the majority in the Supreme court for almost the entirety of the past fifty years?
This is because hope cannot be found in a simple political party. Just because a candidate is Republican does not in any way guarantee that they will be active in the direction they should. Voting for a candidate must be a decision based on the principles and actions of each person concerned.
But what type of action should be taken against these corrupt patterns of pretended legislation? Michael Anthony Peroutka gave a precise series of actions the President can do to quickly rid this country of these atrocities:
Prohibit public and federal funding of any and all abortion organizations as well as any organizations that advocate or perform these abortions.
As the President, direct your attorney general to find and prosecute every single abortion clinic in America on the grounds of child slaughter.
And lastly, encourage state and local officials to do the same.
In the end, no political party is the answer. A firm admission of the God-given right to life and action to follow this admission is the only thing that can correctly right this wrong. That is why it is imperative that we demand candidates of Biblical constitutional principals and actions, and stop blindly trusting any particular party or party candidate to fix the atrocities that exist due to our negligence to our Creator and the Constitution.
Sign up for a FREE U.S. Constitution course with Jake MacAulay and the Institute on the Constitution.
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
I am trying to figure out why the fags and lezbos are up in arms over this.
Makes no sense.
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
I am trying to figure out why the COVID jabbed are up in arms over this.
Makes no sense.
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
https://mailchi.mp/txrtl/062722-war-...l?e=174c3a10ed
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...9vEN.wDa4g--~D
Friend,
Satanists hate God. Their hatred of the Creator leads to a hatred of His creation, especially preborn children who each reflect His face.
You've seen for yourself, the two sides in the fight for Life couldn't be more distinct.
When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the Satanic Temple proudly proclaimed they are "the leading beacon of light in the battle for abortion access."
The Satanic Temple
@satanic_temple_
We are the only federally recognized international (non-theistic) religious Satanic organization.
Subject of documentary film "Hail Satan?" (2019)
Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
Pinned Tweet
The Satanic Temple
@satanic_temple_
The Satanic Temple is the leading beacon of light in the battle for abortion access. With Roe v Wade overturned, a religious exemption will be the only available challenge to many restrictions to access.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWCJD93X...png&name=smallImage
12:10 PM · Jun 24, 2022·Sendible
3,044
Retweets
This is a sobering reminder: Our battle is not one of flesh and blood but against wicked powers and principalities.
But we are NOT afraid, and we won’t back down.
https://ecp.yusercontent.com/mail?ur...ISp6gJB2WA--~D
____________
For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.
Ephesians 6:12
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIef4ALAYV4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIef4ALAYV4
5:40 video runtime
Jun 27, 2022
EDIFY
Since Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973, we’ve seen amazing technological advancements in our computers and smartphones and medical advancements have seen parallel growth. How do those technological and medical advances affect the fight for life? Watch this video from EDIFY now.
Sources:
1:46 CDC Vital and Health Statistics. (January 1993). Trends in Infant Mortality by Cause of Death and Other Characteristics, 1960-88. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/...
3:14 Ehrenhaft, Wagner, & Hermand. (September 1989). Changing prognosis for very low birth weight infants. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2668826/
3:55 NICU Awareness. (January 2016). A Brief History of Advances in Neonatal Care. https://www.nicuawareness.org/blog/a-...
4:32 CBS News. (November 2021). Alabama boy born at 21 weeks and 1 day named world’s most premature infant to survive. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alabama-...
4:40 Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. (December 2017). Prenatal Surgery for Spina Bifida: Avery’s Story. https://www.chop.edu/stories/prenatal...
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
I hate to go to Telegram because I do not know how to navigate there and cannot copy images and repost here.
I copies a little text from a conversation on Telegram and got the photo somewhere else.
However there is a Telegram account named Karma Patriot that has some good stuff there about how this change in law about moving abortion matters to the individual state will also move to the states and from the federal government the whole capability of being involved in "organ trafficking." Chopping up aborted babies and selling the parts
https://qagg.news/images/e6b57b5ea87...9a5864e87f.jpg
Image Name: D_IIQN1WkAAgZT-.jpg
Filename: e6b57b5ea87e0065c869f70fdba7590a6b4bf3d8246ed6059c 6b199a5864e87f.jpg
Reality is hard to swallow.
to all sorts of evil enterprises can no longer be done by the federal government.
Of course, the blue states will let it go on.
Organ trafficking is for very weird and evil "research" done by various departments of the federal government as well as BigPharma as well as foreign laboratories doing gain-of-function research paid for by U S taxpayer dollars for them to create "viruses" and make vaccine ingredients. This enterprise was really why Planned Parenthood exists. This is where the money is, in this dark business.
https://t.me/nyflipbucket
Karma Patriot ��
The first Supreme Court decision in ROE V WADE basically opened the door for the Federal Government to move in & take over FETAL RESEARCH REGULATION & LEGISLATION.
Before ROE V WADE, FETAL RESEARCH was banned & regulated in each STATE by the STATE’S abortion laws.
The SCOTUS decision to overturn ROE V WADE will not only return Abortion
_______________
Karma Patriot ��, [6/24/2022 11:41 AM]
[Forwarded from Just Human ️️]
[ Photo ]
"The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey
are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the
people and their elected representatives."
Karma Patriot ��, [6/28/2022 2:16 PM]
[ Photo ]
Someone mentioned “not trusting pharmaceutical companies”.
Another said “their gut said” it was a bad idea.
Who cares if you trust them?!
It means they are using stem cells from a child who LIVED…..
INSTEAD of stem cells from a child who was MURDERED.
Bc you do know what the “other sources” are, right?
Another person said “the baby needs those stem cells & blood so don’t do it”……I’m sorry, but WHAT?!?
It’s blood from the cord AFTER THE BABY IS BORN. The baby is no longer attached to the cord, so it’s no longer even accessible to the baby.
It’s literally thrown in the trash.
If you don’t bank or donate your cord blood, this life saving research alternative to aborted baby stem cells is THROWN AWAY.
And donating it is FREE.
There is ZERO downside to donating or banking your cord blood.
ZERO.
It only means researchers use fewer murdered babies for their stem cell supply.
Not to mention, those stem cells are now saved in case your child DOES, God forbid, need them someday to fight disease or sickness.
_______________
-
Re: Roe is Over 062422
https://www.theepochtimes.com/texas-...mpaign=roundup
Texas Judge Blocks Statewide Ban on Abortions
By Jack Phillips
June 28, 2022 Updated: June 28, 2022
biggersmaller
Print
0:002:53
Abortions can temporarily resume in Texas after a judge on Tuesday blocked officials from enforcing a law that passed nearly 100 years ago that the state attorney general said is now back in effect following the Supreme Court’s decision last week.
Judge Christine Weems in Harris County issued a temporary injunction following a last-ditch lawsuit filed by pro-abortion groups to resume services after the nation’s highest court struck down the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that argued women have the right to obtain abortions.
The order allows clinics to resume services, for now, in a state where abortion was already restricted to only up to six weeks of pregnancy under a Texas law that took effect in September. A later hearing is scheduled for July 12.
Other than Texas, about a dozen other states set trigger laws that either ban abortions entirely or severely restrict when they can be performed. Texas’s trigger law is slated to go into effect later in the summer after the Supreme Court’s judgment is officially released, which is a separate order from the one that was issued on June 24.
After the Supreme Court opinion was handed down, Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued an advisory that “abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions starting today” based on Texas’s “abortion prohibitions predating Roe.”
Trigger Laws
The law Paxton was referring to was issued in 1925, although last year, the Texas Legislature passed a bill—the Texas Heartbeat Act—that was signed into law that authorizes members of the public to file lawsuits against anyone who performs or facilitates an illegal abortion. An abortion can be deemed illegal in the state once embryonic or fetal cardiac activity is detected, which occurs normally after about six weeks.
One of the groups that filed a lawsuit, the Center for Reproductive Rights, issued a statement Tuesday after the judge’s order.
“This decision will allow abortion services to resume at many clinics across the state” because “every hour that abortion is accessible in Texas is a victory,” Marc Hearron, senior counsel with the left-wing group, said in a statement.
Judges in Louisiana and Utah on Monday also temporarily blocked trigger law bans on abortion in those states, respectively.
Orleans Parish Civil District Judge Robin Giarrusso granted the injunction in Louisiana, leading to resumptions of the procedure. Utah Third District Judge Andrew Stone granted a 14-day temporary restraining order that was requested by Planned Parenthood.
Trigger laws are also being challenged in Idaho, Kentucky, Arizona, and Mississippi courts.
Paxton’s office has not responded to a request for comment. The Texas attorney general has not issued a public statement following Weems’s order on Tuesday.
Reuters contributed to this report.
