Police Officers In NC Advised To Divest Property

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beefsteak

Spec...
instead of bragging about not reading, why don't you read...

PMS==You mean, Perturbed Male Sydrome...
Yeah, that's the way I signed my name to my post, joker.
Not surprised you couldn't see it...
I get PMS when I see your name too, come to think of it, Spec....

---

Beef, he hadn't replied in this thread till you posted yesterday. I don't know that the first response he posted was even directed at you. What gives? You've been on edge.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by osoab

Beef, he hadn't replied in this thread till you posted yesterday. I don't know that the first response he posted was even directed at you. What gives? You've been on edge.

---

It's probably just the Dooom gettin' to him. lol
It can eat into ones presence of mind if one lets it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by palani

Turners' state is no more sovereign than my own or yours.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by beefsteak

ticked off BEEFSTEAK

---

I could be way off on this, but I think Palani was just trying to say that each human being is an independant state, and Turner is no more or no less a "State" than any other human being. (Does that even make sense? WTF and I typing? Haha!)

But my Palanese is pretty sub-standard, so I could be wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Awoke

I could be way off on this, but I think Palani was just trying to say that each human being is an independant state, and Turner is no more or no less a "State" than any other human being. (Does that even make sense? WTF and I typing? Haha!)

---

Basically correct but I would not use human being. I would refer to the the class called "man".

States and governments are separate entities. Governments represent states but I doubt if human beings can be states. Man has the elements of both state and government in himself yet if he chooses to be irresponsible then he must be governed externally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by palani

Basically correct but I would not use human being. I would refer to the the class called "man".

---

What about K-os?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Awoke

What about K-os?

---

...........

Quote:

---

Genesis 1:27 KJV

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

---

Male and female are the two varieties of man.

Man is both male and female.

I'm a male man (but I'm not postal).

;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sirgonzo420

...........



Male and female are the two varieties of man.

Man is both male and female.

I'm a male man (but I'm not postal).

;D

---

'Male'/'female' refers to animals.

With God's creation of the image of Himself it is 'man' and 'wo(mb)man'.

Do NOT refer to me as a 'male'.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by midnight rambler

'Male'/'female' refers to animals.

With God's creation of the image of Himself it is 'man' and 'wo(mb)man'.

Do NOT refer to me as a 'male'.

---

Take it up with King James' translators; I was quoting them. In the original hebrew "man" is "ha adam" (האדם). The essence of man/האדם is both "man" and "woman". That is to say, genderless, like the Creator. In other words, a complete man is actually a couple composed of a man and a woman.

In the context of the KJV of Genesis 1:27, I am a male man. Otherwise I am just a man.

If you wish to consider yourself an animal, have at it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sirgonzo420

Take it up with King James' translators; I was quoting them. In the original hebrew "man" is "ha adam" (האדם). The essence of man/האדם is both "man" and "woman". That is to say, genderless, like the Creator. In other words, a complete man is actually a couple composed of a man and a woman.

In the context of the KJV of Genesis 1:27, I am a male man. Otherwise I am just a man.

---

So according to what you say, one has nuts and the other is nut-less as in non gender?