Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
^ your "efforts" in this row amount to a series of ad-hom fallacies, and straw-man fallacies (see Disinfo Rules #4 & #5), combined with a conspicuous, ongoing refusal to answer a simple & valid question:
...opting instead to try to distract & divert with yet more ad-hom & straw-man fallacies.
And then you try to joobospew: other members have "logic" & "rationality" problems... ;D
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
Ahh I get it.. The joke is on me.
Nice trolling.
I fell for it.
If you are actually serious, and not trolling. I can't even see the point you're trying to make from those two links you keep re posting.
I read them I don't get it. My answer, if you need to see it specifically, is nothing is factual. None of it makes any sense to me. It all amounts to a bunch of lies and nonsense. That is my answer.
What is the point you're trying to make?
Can you sum it up in a few sentences?
Anyone else want to jump in ? ? ? ? ? ?
?????????
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
AI read them I don't get it. My answer, if you need to see it specifically, is nothing is factual. None of it makes any sense to me. It all amounts to a bunch of lies and nonsense. That is my answer.
Let's try this approach: You copy/paste specific line/point(s) made in each of the 2 ZCF blogs which you object to, and respond something like,
"Where ZCF claims [specific line pasted from ZCF/Dawson blogs here] is not factual/ lie/ nonsense/ totally destroys their own credibility...brutally/ Schizoid x 1000/ Deep into moonbat territory BECAUSE _________."
[where you fill in the blank with your specific, sourced explanation for why the given ZCF quote fits your negative description].
Let's see if that ^ approach can help get us through this "row"...\uu\
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
Let's try this approach: You copy/paste a specific line/point made in each of the 2 ZCF blogs, and respond something like,
"[specific line pasted from ZCF/Dawson blogs] is not factual/ lie/ nonsense/ totally destroys their own credibility...brutally/ Schizoid x 1000/ Deep into moonbat territory BECAUSE _________."
[where you fill in the blank with your specific, sourced explanation for why the given ZCF quote fits your negative description].
Let's see it that ^ approach can help get us through this "row"...\uu\
What is your confusion at this point?
I think both articles top to bottom, full stop, are lies.
BECAUSE..........they are both comprised of one outlandish nonsensical lie after another.
BECAUSE.........there is nothing in them that is factual.
BECAUSE........both links are total horseshit made up by paranoid delusional 15 year old's tweaking on mountain dew in their parents basement...which totally destroys ZCF's credibility as a source of anything worth reading by anyone with a sane mind.
Do you need further clarification?
I know I would like some, because you're coming off as one seriously batshit crazy mofo.
Now what would be nice from you is to perhaps stop being such a $%^$ goof, and have an adult conversation by letting ideas flow in both directions.
What is your contention? What is the issue?
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
joboo
I think both articles top to bottom, full stop, are lies.
BECAUSE..........they are both comprised of one outlandish nonsensical lie after another.
BECAUSE.........there is nothing in them that is factual.
BECAUSE........both links are total horseshit made up by paranoid delusional 15 year old's tweaking on mountain dew in their parents basement...which totally destroys ZCF's credibility as a source of anything worth reading by anyone with a sane mind.
Do you need further clarification?
Since you kindly asked joobo; yes, I'm afraid I do. :|~http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/s...20%2824%29.gif
I really can't make this any more STEP BY STEP for you:
Quote:
You copy/paste
specific line/point(s) made in each of the 2 ZCF blogs which you object to, and respond something like,
"Where ZCF claims [specific line pasted from ZCF/Dawson blogs here] is not factual/ lie/ nonsense/ totally destroys their own credibility...brutally/ Schizoid x 1000/ Deep into moonbat territory BECAUSE _________."
[where you fill in the blank with your specific, sourced explanation for why the given ZCF quote fits your negative description].
So, no more broad-brush "top to bottom" generalities... but rather SPECIFIC, copy/pasted lines which you then SPECIFICALLY REFUTE INCLUDING ANY SOURCES SUBSTANTIATING YOUR REFUTATION.
MMMMKAY? OO)~
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
"This Kosher Klown just keeps sinking deeper and deeper into his bowl of rotten gefilte fish."
Idiotic 15yr old nonsensical rhetoric.
In his latest video Dawson actually claims that “nobody” listens to people like me. That’s funny because the website stats tell a different story. According to the data, FAR more people are coming to my site than that of Ryan Dawson.
Sorry my apologies. This could be true. And this lends credibility to what exactly other than ZCF likes to brag about penis stat size. Very impressive.
"Along with the Jew censors who are responsible for shutting this site down twice, Dawson has egg on his face. Dawson wields the term “neo-nazi” like the ADL does, he calls people “anti-Semitic” and “bigots” like the ADL does, yet actually has the nerve to assert that my site is a “front” for the ADL!
Are there broad-brush racist people in the world like Ry claims? Hate to break it to you man, but yes there most definitely is. Welcome to planet earth.
"This is standard schizoid Jew doublethink at its finest."
More 15yr old Baseless accusation. Mere opinion.So compelling. Awards for journalistic excellence forthcoming.
Link #2
"Ryan Dawson purports to be an “anti-neocon” activist. Anyone who has done the necessary research into what “neoconservatism” is all about could tell you that the term “neocon” is nothing more than a euphemism for Jew."
Every neocon is a Jew? Really? More fallacious idiocy.
"Dawson recently had a major chimp-out on his forum which nearly caused him to choke on his crispy fillet of gefilte fish.
Idiotic childish accusation.
"Using classic ADL verbiage, this dedicated servant of Zion screeched, Ry says: “Its you closet anti-semetic chicken shits and outright bigots that feed the zionist system and victimhood status. You’re just as fucking stupid as they are apologizing for nazis”.
This is the truth. You yourself just posted a video of David Cole saying the same thing.
"Dawson later wails about how “anti-Semites” have ‘hijacked’ his 9/11 research, stating: “Mother fuckers hijacked my 911 theory and just add jew jew jew to it. These are the discrediting pukes that push people away from supporting social justice in Palestine in Syria etc.”
And Ry would be right about that, because that is what happened.
snip...
That's as far as I'm going to take this pathetic experience. Being Jewish, and following the Zionist political ideology are two different realities, and they are quickly differentiating.
If you think every Jew is a Zionist perhaps you need to get out of the basement your mind is in, and go meet some real people in the world outside of a computer screen.
If you think otherwise, then it's painfully obvious what you're really about along with these two ZCF fansite articles.
Good luck with your ZCF broad-brush racist nonsense. You'll be spinning your wheels while more intelligent people affect real change in the world by appealing to a broader audience with a far more common sense approach.
I bet you thought Ron Paul could have made it all the way if he only he espoused more blanket joo, and no plane pentagon conspiracy talk.
Good grief. What a waste of time.
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
Not know what you refer to.. my language.
You maybe racist?
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
10 Bears
Not know what you refer to.. my language.
You maybe racist?
Are you still humming along at 10 beers, or have you upgraded to 18?
Teeth floating yet?
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chad
no, i'm referring to the talking like tonto schtick. it's way better than the gold duck. i'm cracking up over here. :D
If I say in my language you are bout to be hit by bus do you move or bust out laughing at accent? Me think I know answer but enlighten me please.
Everyone have online personality. I go with ancestor representation. 10 Bears parents ashamed of family Oklahoma red roots. One should never feel shame for roots. One need only embrace ancestry as big part of who they are.
I see I am not welcome here.
Re: Alex Jones taken behind the Woodshed
The video in the OP really makes some good points about Alex Jones.
Edit:
I do not think that anybody has the right to judge if another is "allowed" to post here. I enjoy speaking with new people and I don't feel like I should have to be here all the time to be nice and reasonable in order to have the privilege of doing so. In other words, it is rude (towards people like me) of the charter members to run new posters off for little or no reason.
People are responding more to your presence and less to your ideas and statements and that is sad.
Quote:
I see I am not welcome here.
You can join me in never having known, in my whole life, if I am fully welcome anywhere.
