Yes it makes you wonder where these people get their training doesn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
Printable View
Yes it makes you wonder where these people get their training doesn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
I don't think it is odd, when you are shooting 5 to 10 yr. olds, its easy to get a kill, skill really? no skill involved just hate and metal retardation, what a sick bastard, fine shoot your MOM but why shoot a bunch of little kids?Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
I am glad the shooter is dead. to bad he couldn't have suffered a little bit before he died.
There was the one (and only one as far as I can tell) reported injury where the woman was shot in the leg or foot.Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
I've been trying to wrap my head around the situation despite the lack of info in that area - was those really his mother's guns, or did he use his brother's ID to purchase them? Where did the spare mags come from? Did he purchase those himself? If not, who bought all those evil black guns?? If he made this purchases himself (over $2,000 in cost for just the three guns), where did he get the money to do so? If he did buy all these himself (acquire the guns, spare mags, and ammo), how did a kid growing up in a non-rural area have a clue about what guns to buy? If this 20 y.o. was somehow 'knowledgeable' about guns, did he intentionally purchase the much more deadly personal defense ammo like Golden Sabers, Winchester Ranger, etc. (this would account for no children surviving)?
And most importantly, what was his history of taking meds and what meds had he been taking recently??
So many questions and of course we're going to be left in the dark in order to further a certain agenda.
Anyone want to take a bet that this kid was on anti-depressants?
Just check out this video to see how bad these things are and tell me he didn't display the behavior this doctor talks about.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBJfZ...ature=youtu.be
Link--> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBJfZ...ature=youtu.be
I'm just saying that if he was under mind control (MKUltra) he may have just been a patsy. Someone else may have done the shooting and then shot him.Quote:
Originally Posted by zap
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
?
I'am not sure how to form this into a question, but if someone else could have done ALL THAT, then why not just leave the gun and walk away.
People under their own mind can't carry out this kind of stuff on orders.
Lets not forget there were 2 gunmen.
I'm thinking that (just about) the ONLY way for someone to get to such a dark place in their own mind (that they are willing to kill young children) is via pharmaceuticals. (Kurt Vonnegut referred to this sort of condition as "having bad chemicals in his head" in his work Breakfast of Champions)
Hell's bells, just witness all the Big Pharma ads where the 'side effects' include..."thoughts of suicide" - and OF COURSE if someone is having suicidal thoughts they are ALSO having HOMICIDAL thoughts*. Duh!
*fucking NATURALLY those Big Pharma ads are NEVER, EVER going to mention "side effects include...thoughts of homicide" - but ya know those kind of thoughts just go hand in hand, like peas and carrots
SURELY I'm not the only one thinking of this, however those with the (bully) pulpit are going to keep it to themselves - or get fired.
Tell me, why does the MSM detail the exact nature & names of the guns used?
Because it perfectly suits their agenda of gun control since all three guns are (evil), black, accept hi-cap mags, and are ONLY intended for killing large numbers of people* - which are precisely the ones they want to ban.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
*a revolver is more than sufficient for "self-defense inside your home"
These fuckers are on a roll, they have their spiel down pat this go 'round.
Amazing how some crazed man would take the time to select different calibers.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
How it has any relevance to the case at this point, eludes me.
I have not seen any reference in any accounts as to the calibers of the two pistols he used - have you a link indicating that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Spot on.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
http://www.paxilprogress.org/forums/...ad.php?t=26951
Time to take the guns on a boating trip..........
The entire story doesn't make sense for three different weapons and tactical garb, its full of holes in that aspect.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
The second gunman totally changes the entire story. No longer is it a madman that snapped, it's organized. When something is organized, it doesn't matter if weapons are legal or not.
Not to mention, the fact that two people would agree to kill kindergarteners opens up an entirely different discussion.
The only thing I've found so far ID'ed the Glock as a 9mm, no info on caliber of Sig that I've seen thus far.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
All news reports are saying that all guns including AR were 'registered' (Conn. requires a permit for the purchase of handguns apparently) to Nancy Lanza the shooter's mother. I cannot imagine a mother who teaches/is a teacher's assistant/whatever of kindergarteners purchasing three such evil black guns (ESPECIALLY the AR) - except perhaps to appease her younger son somehow.
9 mm Glock and 9 mm Sig Sauer handguns found at scene. .232 Buckmaster rifle found in car.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
The "facts" are all over the place in these articles. I've seen one article that 4 firearms were found. Another states that his mother was NOT the teacher but possibly volunteered at the school at one point and was shot to death in her home.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
An official with knowledge of the situation said the shooter was armed with a .223-caliber rifle. Four weapons in total were recovered from the scene. The motive is not yet known.
This article has a lot more detail about the family, and insight about the shooter. It indicates the mother as a "former" teacher at the school. Implications from earlier TV stories was that she IS a teacher, and he went to her classroom. You're right, a lot of questionable information.Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...1220752?pgno=1
The level of reporting just insults intelligence, as there is absolutely no investigative interviews of eyewitness at all. Its all how do you feel questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
Its only a review of Connecticut's gun laws.
Any question of off base bias here?
This article says the shooter "then went to nearby Sandy Hook Elementary School where she taught and gunned down her entire class"Quote:
Originally Posted by sunshine05
The NY Post article identifies her as a "former" teacher at the school.
Maybe reporters aren't allowed within 500 meters of the scene? And all witnesses are securely in custody?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Holy shit! The mother was receiving alimony payments from her ex of nearly $300K annually.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky
It appears the mother bought the three guns and allowed her "deeply disturbed" son unfettered access to those guns. Clearly an inexcusable failure to exercise intelligence or sound judgment under the circumstances.
It is also noteworthy that the shooter was a 'gamer'.
Bushmaster .223?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky
that does seem to be a common theme...prozac and video games....so its the guns we need to go after ::)Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
Looks like all gun owners will be given mental evaluations as to their right to own.
Any found to harbor any neglect or animosity towards the collective us.gov will be denied... as that is mental....
Attachment 4186Quote:
Originally Posted by drafter
Important youtube clips can be saved:
http://keepvid.com/
It's fucking hilarious how anti-gunners are saying "shoot gunowners" and shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shami-Amourae
Shoot them with what? Guns?
The ones advocating going to an NRA meeting and shooting everyone are kind of funny when you think about itQuote:
Originally Posted by sirgonzo420
Yes, I'll go back and correct my post. Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Libertarian_Guard
Edit: Damn, it won't let me edit.
You just made a sig-worthy quote... dontcha know!Quote:
Originally Posted by sirgonzo420
You do realize those are all shills working for the folks directly responsible for this tragedy, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by sirgonzo420
It's called follow-up Public Relations.
Now they are saying parents aren't allowed to view their slain children who will lay where they fell till Sunday for the "investigation"
Sounds like some weird kind of three day ritual thing going on to me considering the supposed shooter is dead.
WTF?
8:06 p.m.: Vance, speaking to CNN's Soledad O'Brien, says they'll be processing the crime scene until Sunday and that the bodies of the children and adults killed remain in the school where they fell, and will still be there until Sunday. Parents have not been allowed to see the bodies of their children. "We will leave no stone unturned" in pursuit of answering the questions of how and why this happened, says Vance. At this time he would not confirm the name of the shooter or whether he had "a personality disorder" or "a mental disorder."
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/natio...hooting/59999/
Obviously it wasn't their children, they were just custodians for the state... This is sick!Quote:
Originally Posted by old steel
Totally, incomprehensibly, f*cked up behavior.Quote:
Originally Posted by old steel
To the average person, suggesting this was a false flag makes you look insane. However, if news of what is going on right now is spread, it might just make them realize something is really wrong here.
Now we watch as the M$M largely ignores this demonic activity as it strains at gnats and swallows elephants.Quote:
Originally Posted by old steel