Sodomize me!!! Please!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/boston-bombs-s...8341--spt.htmlQuote:
"They can give me a cavity search right now and I'd be perfectly happy,"
Sodomize me!!! Please!!!
http://news.yahoo.com/boston-bombs-s...8341--spt.htmlQuote:
"They can give me a cavity search right now and I'd be perfectly happy,"
The copiceman's uniform does not fit right. It's not his uniform, it's way too big for him.Quote:
Originally Posted by General of Darkness
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
I'm with Obama on this one, it should change nothing at all.Quote:
He added: "The American people refuse to be terrorized."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/n...0,318317.story
Only when other people do it to us, it's terrorism. When we do it to other people, it's collateral damage. The hypocrisy is sickening.Quote:
“This was a heinous and cowardly act and given what we now know about what took place, the FBI is investigating it as an act of terrorism,” Obama said in televised comments from the White House. “Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians, it is an act of terror.”
Uniformed soldiers? Possibly a test to see if there would be any resistance to military involvement in controlling domestic disturbances? Remember, posse comitatus was neutered in 2006 for this exact reason.Quote:
Police and uniformed soldiers were allowing guests at nearby hotels -- some still in marathon gear -- to enter the restricted zone to retrieve their belongings from their rooms. Canine units were in the area.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
I thought the bomb squad found a third bomb a mile away and disposed of it.Quote:
Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick said no unexploded bombs were found at the Boston Marathon, contradicting earlier reports. Only the two bombs that exploded were found, he said.
Again, a test to see if there would be any resistance to a stronger police state?Quote:
Police eyed commuters in subways, cordons of security around landmarks were extended and everyone was urged to report suspicious packages and people.
Translation: The American people are starting to grow tired of our military exploits abroad, so we need to scare them into submission.Quote:
“This should be a wake-up call to everyone, that the war against terrorism is far from over.”
hmmmm.....i seem to remember dhs ordering 4,000 lbs of explosives for "training". So, they have the means...were at the scene...and had motivation.
Any DHS purchases of high capacity pressure cookers?Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRock
Pressure cookers will be monitered for sales and you will need to get a license to purchase and use one.
The incident at the JFK library is now just a "fire" I guess.Quote:
Originally Posted by madfranks
Them shutting off all cellphone service was definitely a testQuote:
Originally Posted by madfranks
Will you need a permit for concealed cooking? Is open cooking legal?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cebu_4_2
background checks to be required before purchaseQuote:
Originally Posted by JohnQPublic
Quote:
Originally Posted by General of Darkness
http://tv.yahoo.com/news/seth-macfar...194203016.htmlQuote:
Seth MacFarlane is furious that scenes from his popular FOX animated series, "Family Guy" were edited in such a way as to suggest the show had a plot line where its main character detonates two bombs at the Boston Marathon.
"The edited Family Guy clip currently circulating is abhorrent," MacFarlane Tweeted, before turning his attention to those affected in Boston. "The event was a crime and a tragedy, and my thoughts are with the victims."
[CODE]http://tv.yahoo.com/news/seth-macfarlane-slams-edited-family-guy-marathon-related-194203016.html[/CODE]
Now we got our tainted envelopes...
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau.../picture-5.jpg
Anthrax Scare 2.0: Letter Addressed To US Senator Tests Positive For Ricin Poison
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/16/2013 - 18:30 Yesterday we got a flashback of 9/11, and now the Anthrax scare is back. From @911Buff
- LETTER ADDRESSED TO A U.S. SENATE OFFICE INTERCEPTED AT U.S. CAPITAL, TESTS POSITIVE FOR RICIN POISION.
- POISON LETTER WAS SENT TO SENATOR ROGER WICKER FROM MISSISSIPPI AT THE CAPITOL. FBI INVESTIGATING.
Ricin's toxic history is long and illustrious: starting with the death of Bulgarian dissident journalist Georgi Markov, using the infamous KGB umbrella, and most recently used by Walter White (unsuccessfully) to eliminate the meth dealing competition.
We're Now Being Told Not To Say There Were Unexploded Devices Today
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=mAUSHrh6nUU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mAUSHrh6nUU
@ 4:40 both of them say that there were unexploded bombs "found"
@6:40 she backtracks speech speeds up and stutters too.
Fineswine: No advance intelligence.
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/po...ombs_in_boston
Suuuuuuuuuuuure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight rambler
I have a pretty good idea.Quote:
"What's unusual is that nobody has taken credit for this in the terrorist world, but don't assume anything from that," he said. "We really don't know who the terrorist was or where the terrorist was from."
The Big Sleep
BROUGHT TO YOU BY COPS POSING AS TERRORISTS
By John Kaminski
When are we going to wake up?
Will we ever be able to see how our government deliberately turns our joyous days into tragedies, and now has advanced its criminality into killing innocent people as part of a drill to show us why we have to be frisked, molested or irradiated at every public event we attend?
It’s not exactly new stuff, this Boston Massacre Marathon Drill. For those who still haven’t gotten the message, the Boston Police have admitted and numerous witnesses have observed that before the bombs that killed and maimed hundreds of happy observers of an innocent road race that the authorities were conducting an anti-terror drill during the race.
The bombs that went off on that sunny, happy spring afternoon prove beyond doubt — and once again, for the hundredth time — that it is our government that are the terrorists, and they’re not out to protect us — they’re out to kill us — and rob us and enslave us — while they demonstrate this demented need for security as they themselves create the terror. Read the rest here
Does anyone know if this story is legit?
http://thecount.com/wp-content/uploads/2vblu9f.jpg
http://thecount.com/2013/04/16/sandy...ston-marathon/
And another...
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau.../picture-5.jpg
Obama Receives Ricin Letter - White House Webcast At 11:45 EDT
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/17/2013 - 11:15 Yesterday Sarin for Senators, now suspicious substances sent to Obama? CNN reports:
- LETTER WITH SUSPICIOUS SUBSTANCE WAS SENT TO OBAMA: CNN
- SECRET SERVICE: SUSPICIOUS LETTER TO OBAMA RECEIVED YESTERDAY
- CNN says letter was found at off-site mail-screening facility, substance is unknown, cites unidentified Secret Service officials.
It appears the "suspicious substance" was not a balanced budget, but sarin toxin instead, as the letter received in the Senate yesterday.
Suspicious letter addressed to Obama has tested positive for ricin (as did letter to Sen Roger Wicker (R-MS)
Our take home from all of this is that the USPS appears to still be in business. Amazing.
and to think they were running drills.
i'm wondering if there was a simple explanation. someone phoned in a warning.
the US gov. & the City of Boston decided to go ahead with the Marathon, anticipating a terrorist event that would be good for the War of Terror.
another mini-LIHOP.
should all patriotic Americans now buy a Dremel tool, engrave a serial number on their pressure cookers, and email the number to DHS ?
to make us all more secure, i mean. /sarc
they still haven't said what kind of B-O-M-B it was though.
There were Newton families at the finish line. There should not be fallen victims there, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Son-of-Liberty
SHOCKING BEFORE PICTURE.. BOMB PICTURED ON ROUTE
[Does not look like a backpack to me, but may be nothing (mail?)- JQP]
Looks like they found their perp.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau.../picture-5.jpg
Boston Bombing Suspect Arrested
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/17/2013 - 13:50 More headlines coming out, now from CNN and WCVB TV in Boston, that a suspect is now in custody:
- A suspect has been arrested
- Janet Wu reports it is a man who was arrested.
- The officials says the suspect is to be taken into custody by federal marshals and taken to a courthouse.
- There is no immediate word on where the arrest was made.
- A source tells Newscenter5's WuWCVB that one male suspect delivered both bombs.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau.../picture-5.jpg
Boston Bombing Suspect Identified, Authorities Believe
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/17/2013 - 13:12 It appears the hunt for the so far unidentified Boston nomber may be coming to an end. From Bloomberg:
- OFFICIALS BELIEVE BOMBING SUSPECT IDENTIFIED, CNN SAYS
- ONE SUSPECT CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN VIDEO, CNN'S KING SAYS
- AUTHORITIES HAVE IMAGE OF SUSPECT W/BAG AT 2ND BOMB SITE:GLOBE
- IDENTIFICATION COMING FROM STORE SECURITY CAMERA, CNN SAYS
- Authorities have an image of a suspect carrying, and perhaps dropping, a black bag at the second bombing scene - Globe.com
And the kicker:
- Suspect is a "dark-skinned male" according to CNN. Apparently that is the proper nomenclature.
We will bring readers the picture when it is released.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/defau.../picture-5.jpg
Update: Boston Bombing Suspect HAS NOT BEEN Arrested
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/17/2013 - 13:50 More headlines coming out, now from CNN and WCVB TV in Boston, that a suspect is now in custody:
- Law enforcement official: Boston Marathon bomb suspect in custody, expected in federal court.
- Janet Wu reports it is a man who was arrested.
- The officials says the suspect is to be taken into custody by federal marshals and taken to a courthouse.
- There is no immediate word on where the arrest was made.
- Suspects at Federal Court are brought into an entrance away from public view.
- Jack Harper says the security at the Federal Courthouse is almost unprecedented.
- A source tells Newscenter5's WuWCVB that one male suspect delivered both bombs.
Hey, if Obama had a son, it could be like him!Quote:
Originally Posted by osoab
J6P edited for the correct format.Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnQPublic
This is clearly a racist website. Everyone is programmed to respond "dark skinned" ===> "middle east terrorist" (you know, like an Israeli or something), but instead you jump to blaming it on blacks. Despecable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnqpublic
lol...
What are you saying JQP?
There are plenty of Right Wing extremists from the middle east.
Who the fuck knows these days.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/phot...prayer_500.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by General of Darkness
That's photoshopped. :rolleyes:
Attachment 4729
Sporting navy blue slacks, and matching bullet-proof vest,
and tilted mountie style headwear,
ociffer Larry struts through town with his fully automatic
assault rifle.
More pics here: http://avaxnews.net/sad/Boston_Marathon_Bombing.html
^^ I thought weapons of war didn't belong on the streets! Oh, they must have meant, weapons of war don't belong on the streets, unless it's us who has them.
This guy alleges that a report was to be released Monday:
A nonpartisan, independent review of interrogation and detention programs in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks concludes that “it is indisputable that the United States engaged in the practice of torture” and that the nation’s highest officials bore ultimate responsibility for it.
U.S. Engaged in Torture After 9/11, Review Concludes
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/wo...anted=all&_r=0
Quote:
WASHINGTON — A nonpartisan, independent review of interrogation and detention programs in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks concludes that “it is indisputable that the United States engaged in the practice of torture” and that the nation’s highest officials bore ultimate responsibility for it.
Related in Opinion
- Editorial: Indisputable Torture (April 17, 2013)
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/...mbStandard.jpg
Connect With Us on Twitter
Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.
Twitter List: Reporters and Editors
The sweeping, 577-page report says that while brutality has occurred in every American war, there never before had been “the kind of considered and detailed discussions that occurred after 9/11 directly involving a president and his top advisers on the wisdom, propriety and legality of inflicting pain and torment on some detainees in our custody.” The study, by an 11-member panel convened by the Constitution Project, a legal research and advocacy group, is to be released on Tuesday morning.
Debate over the coercive interrogation methods used by the administration of President George W. Bush has often broken down on largely partisan lines. The Constitution Project’s task force on detainee treatment, led by two former members of Congress with experience in the executive branch — a Republican, Asa Hutchinson, and a Democrat, James R. Jones — seeks to produce a stronger national consensus on the torture question.
While the task force did not have access to classified records, it is the most ambitious independent attempt to date to assess the detention and interrogation programs. A separate 6,000-page report on the Central Intelligence Agency’s record by the Senate Intelligence Committee, based exclusively on agency records, rather than interviews, remains classified.
“As long as the debate continues, so too does the possibility that the United States could again engage in torture,” the report says.
The use of torture, the report concludes, has “no justification” and “damaged the standing of our nation, reduced our capacity to convey moral censure when necessary and potentially increased the danger to U.S. military personnel taken captive.” The task force found “no firm or persuasive evidence” that these interrogation methods produced valuable information that could not have been obtained by other means. While “a person subjected to torture might well divulge useful information,” much of the information obtained by force was not reliable, the report says.
Interrogation and abuse at the C.I.A.’s so-called black sites, the Guantánamo Bay prison in Cuba and war-zone detention centers, have been described in considerable detail by the news media and in declassified documents, though the Constitution Project report adds many new details.
It confirms a report by Human Rights Watch that one or more Libyan militants were waterboarded by the C.I.A., challenging the agency’s longtime assertion that only three Al Qaeda prisoners were subjected to the near-drowning technique. It includes a detailed account by Albert J. Shimkus Jr., then a Navy captain who ran a hospital for detainees at the Guantánamo Bay prison, of his own disillusionment when he discovered what he considered to be the unethical mistreatment of prisoners.
But the report’s main significance may be its attempt to assess what the United States government did in the years after 2001 and how it should be judged. The C.I.A. not only waterboarded prisoners, but slammed them into walls, chained them in uncomfortable positions for hours, stripped them of clothing and kept them awake for days on end.
The question of whether those methods amounted to torture is a historically and legally momentous issue that has been debated for more than a decade inside and outside the government. The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel wrote a series of legal opinions from 2002 to 2005 concluding that the methods were not torture if used under strict rules; all the memos were later withdrawn. News organizations have wrestled with whether to label the brutal methods unequivocally as torture in the face of some government officials’ claims that they were not.
In addition, the United States is a signatory to the international Convention Against Torture, which requires the prompt investigation of allegations of torture and the compensation of its victims.
Like the still-secret Senate interrogation report, the Constitution Project study was initiated after President Obama decided in 2009 not to support a national commission to investigate the post-9/11 counterterrorism programs, as proposed by Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, and others. Mr. Obama said then that he wanted to “look forward, not backward.” Aides have said he feared that his own policy agenda might get sidetracked in a battle over his predecessor’s programs.
The panel studied the treatment of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, in Afghanistan and Iraq, and at the C.I.A’s secret prisons. Staff members, including the executive director, Neil A. Lewis, a former reporter for The New York Times, traveled to multiple detention sites and interviewed dozens of former American and foreign officials, as well as former detainees.
Mr. Hutchinson, who served in the Bush administration as chief of the Drug Enforcement Administration and under secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said he “took convincing” on the torture issue. But after the panel’s nearly two years of research, he said he had no doubts about what the United States did.
“This has not been an easy inquiry for me, because I know many of the players,” Mr. Hutchinson said in an interview. He said he thought everyone involved in decisions, from Mr. Bush down, had acted in good faith, in a desperate effort to try to prevent more attacks.
“But I just think we learn from history,” Mr. Hutchinson said. “It’s incredibly important to have an accurate account not just of what happened but of how decisions were made.”
He added, “The United States has a historic and unique character, and part of that character is that we do not torture.”
The panel found that the United States violated its international legal obligations by engineering “enforced disappearances” and secret detentions. It questions recidivism figures published by the Defense Intelligence Agency for Guantánamo detainees who have been released, saying they conflict with independent reviews.
It describes in detail the ethical compromise of government lawyers who offered “acrobatic” advice to justify brutal interrogations and medical professionals who helped direct and monitor them. And it reveals an internal debate at the International Committee of the Red Cross over whether the organization should speak publicly about American abuses; advocates of going public lost the fight, delaying public exposure for months, the report finds.
Mr. Jones, a former ambassador to Mexico, noted that his panel called for the release of a declassified version of the Senate report and said he believed that the two reports, one based on documents and the other largely on interviews, would complement each other in documenting what he called a grave series of policy errors.
“I had not recognized the depths of torture in some cases,” Mr. Jones said. “We lost our compass.”
While the Constitution Project report covers mainly the Bush years, it is critical of some Obama administration policies, especially what it calls excessive secrecy. It says that keeping the details of rendition and torture from the public “cannot continue to be justified on the basis of national security” and urges the administration to stop citing state secrets to block lawsuits by former detainees.
The report calls for the revision of the Army Field Manual on interrogation to eliminate Appendix M, which it says would permit an interrogation for 40 consecutive hours, and to restore an explicit ban on stress positions and sleep manipulation.
The core of the report, however, may be an appendix: a detailed 22-page legal and historical analysis that explains why the task force concluded that what the United States did was torture. It offers dozens of legal cases in which similar treatment was prosecuted in the United States or denounced as torture by American officials when used by other countries.
The report compares the torture of detainees to the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. “What was once generally taken to be understandable and justifiable behavior,” the report says, “can later become a case of historical regret.”
I think it finally happened to GoD...Quote:
Originally Posted by General of Darkness
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Momqgfs5Teo
This is a must read: http://pieczenik.blogspot.com/
Compliments of outdoorsman
Kenneth Curtis from Tupelo Arrested in Ricin ScareQuote:
“I am KC and I approve this message.”
This could be a Bombshell.....
http://www.prisonplanet.com/navy-sea...backpacks.html
Chris Kyle's Military Contractor Company's connection?
http://www.thecraft.com/AboutUs.html - <-----------This is Chris Kyle's Military Contractor Company called 'The Craft'. Look here!
For comparison, below are a few photos of late Navy SEAL Chris Kyle. Note the skull logo on his baseball cap, his pants and his boots:
http://static.infowars.com/2013/04/i.../chriskyle.jpg
http://static.infowars.com/2013/04/i...al/kylecap.jpg http://static.infowars.com/2013/04/i...l/kylecap2.jpg
Now look at the individuals spotted wearing backpacks, a similar cap, and similar pants (and boots) at the Boston Marathon:
http://i.imgur.com/jCgAf8Y.jpg
http://static.infowars.com/2013/04/i...l/punisher.jpg
SJ, the plot just got thicker.
I noticed that in the pictures, but it was ont clear to me that it was anything special. Tihs is looking more and more like a set-up or FF.
Did anybody see this? Maybe I missed it in the thread already if it was posted, if not, check it out.
WARNING very graphic picture the moment you click on the link (it happens to be the topic of discussion).WARNING
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbi...photo.php&_rdr