Did you notice how the ground seems to "lean" when the moon is rising?, it is the earth moon gravity magnetic unipol pulling you... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
Printable View
Did you notice how the ground seems to "lean" when the moon is rising?, it is the earth moon gravity magnetic unipol pulling you... ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
You already derailed it. BarnkleBob came back from the kibbutz and gave you 10 secs of Hollywood "truth". No really Goldie the Matrix isn't a true depiction of reality. Nothing of what you post is even vaguely related to rationality. Your "real scientists" are more akin to voodoo practitioners, and that is what the picture was of.Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
"Gravities strong grasp can hold the sun, planets, stars, galaxies, seas, mountains & specks of sand in place yet its not strong enuff to prevent a wave from cresting, a tree from rising or a bird from flying!"Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
All the gravity nonsense concerning mass, how much mass is in a droplet of water or a mote of dust? Someones got a lot of splaining to do! How then does the Mymaridae fly w/o violating the laws of gravity?
I dont care if anybody is pissed off because s/he wants science to remain rationally explainable forever... it just cannot be.
Talk of a grasp of reality if not grasping this
Neo statement in the matrix clip is undebunkable, I am afraid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
debunk that your brain is not an electric device (that electricity doesnt run between synapses), and you get a point.
Hollywood happens to tell the truth, in this case it surely does. You hate this, I dont give a damn.
Stupidity is raceless/cultureless... and comparing metaphysics of electricity to voodoo is too child-like.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
You really don't get the irony of you posting an a forum that all aspects from electricity to communication to the hardware and software was developed with science do you? Everything you claim to support was because of the results of science and now science is "bad"?
Irony or Hypocrisy?
Electricity discharge doesn't run between synapses, neurotransmitters (chemical molecules) do. An electric potential is running down the axon to the synapse which release the neurotransmitter, but really the electric potential, and its transportation is chemical in origin too. The notion that the nervous system is electrical is a gross oversimplification, and actually wrong in 99 cases of a hundred. So shall we agree on a fail for you? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
I think your interpretation of what I hate is interesting, but really darling, you are way off.
Probably it was your lack of thinking combined with your absurd and hard pressed notion that no-one else apart from you are able to think that drove off the "two dozen thinkers" ;D
How is it going with denouncing satanism?
just ran into an interesting piece
=============
Reluctance = the resistance within a magnetic circuit, usually an iron core. Nature will always take the path of least resistance.
The terms ‘magnetic’, ‘magnetism’, and ‘magnetic circuit’ are used from a conventional perspective and are not used in a way to support a SEPARATE force of magnetism.
MSS = main stream science, the conventional perspective of science
TBP = the Thunderbolts Project, promoters of the electric universe (EU)
LOF = loops of force which are, MIND PRESENT within the physical universe
Gravity = undivided Stillness. It is a direction not a force. Stillness centers (hub) all motion. Motion implies loop motion
Divided gravity = a polarised condition, a +ve/-ve. A Metaphysical Concept appears as two polar aspects within the physical
CRT = cathode ray tube. The properties discovered by man apply to all Physical Creation. The expanse of space acts as a CRT
NT = The genius that is Nikola Tesla
There is no forces of magnetism or gravity in Nature. Magnetism and gravity seem to exist !
They are effects, whose cause is electricity. There is only one type of electricity. Electric current does not flow in a wire, motion is expressed in loops around the wire – skin effect. Those loops surrounding a current carrying wire are Mind Thought-Loops !
Those spinning loops create the illusion of current running in the wire.
Polarity acts like a distillation column separating matter according to their individual electric condition. Centripetal/compressing motion migrates towards the anode, while centrifugal/expanding motion migrates towards the cathode.
Mind appears to be divided because there is an outside rim Mind pushing inwards with centripetal motion AND there is a central hub Mind which is resisting that inward push by centrifugally pushing back from the hub to the rim. It appears as though Mind is fighting with itself. But, in doing so a stable central hole/orifice is maintained at the center of the loop.
http://www.walter-russell.com/electricity/
scientism really rules you... electricity arranges and manages all chemical reactions and mating between molecules. All life depends, on electricity, even water. Atoms only get together or reject one one another depending on their electric components/charges, whether they are compatible or not. Because it is a matter of wavelength, aka vibration, which is an electric component.
you have way to go. You are not ready to merge spirituality and science just yet, it is beyond your own understanding.
The heart and the brain are more than any other organs electric amplifiers so to speak. Inner peace and true sense of self reflect on the alignment of their frequencies.
Your brain is electric matter, just electric waves which all matter is. Matter does not think nor does it KNOW. You do not think with your Brain, you think through it by Projecting an Electric Current through it.” ~ Walter Russell
ps: I am a metathinker by the way ;D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
Of course chemistry is essentially the electric bonding of ions, but that is not what you said. You claimed that electricity is running between the synapses. This is plain wrong a neurotransmitter molecule transversing the gap of the synapse isn't an electric charge, it isn't even an ion. You really are out of your league here, but you clearly are to stupid to realize it.Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
The heart and the brain are not electric amplifiers. The heart is there to pump oxygenated blood to your body. The brain... well in your case it probably mostly is an electric amplifier... ;D
I think Neuro likes the producer of that video I posted. Its making him squint lol ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
this guy is definitely out of the box and onto something
Using the law of polarity for healing makes sense because sick cells have lost their original electric balance and cannot mate healthily anymore.
I only watched the 1st vid and will view the 2nd later today
true without a resistance nothing progresses, these long arguments always makes me seek for better answers.
=================
How Electricity Helps The Body To Heal Faster - Stem Cell Activator
Uploaded on Oct 11, 2011
With over 35 years using electrotherapy Bob explains how electricity has been used to heal bones, heal bedsores, stop pain, even create life with sperm and egg in humans and animals (http://www.medfaxxinc.com). He explains what his personal opinion is using electrical positive and negative charges to heal people, plants and why polarity seems to be the most important physical component. The human body can heal itself when fed electrical charges of varying polarities.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXvlAJ0rdfU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPU5iEfFVY
none of them...
I am arguing from the stand point of holistic thinking and contend that science without metaphysics and metathinking will forever remain destructive as a whole (thus bad). That is precisely why, for example, scientists working for big pharma do not see a thing and when they do, they rather choose following the money because they do not possess the knowledge or insight to look at their lab experiments differently. Electricity has 7 laws that cannot be bypass nor bent. And the world is going under because of this very reason.
I am much more interested in the topic of electricity on a metaphilosophical level, because if the mindset does change first (stay caught in a polarity catch 22), let alone trying to improve science and psychology.
Many on here would agree that the nobel cartel is a hoax but when presenting new and challenging theories, people will stick to the old ones regardless. Though the EU is pretty simple in its approach because so obvious , but that how truth often works... hidden in plain sight
the laws of light demonstrates that everything is interconnected, there is no separation between spirituality and materialism. Matter is the result of pure energy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
what was saying arthur c clarke again: that a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic ???
sound/vibration, byproduct of electricity affecting matter. the person who sent me this was musing about the whole universe being levitated by sound... and why not???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrknhRCQdC4
time to wake up guy and smell the coffee. Time to choose between continuing to chase money like apemen or seeing the world completely differently by the acknowledgement of cosmic mysteries that have been with us for about millennia already.
anyone would have shown somebody a cell phone 500 years ago, would have be burned at the stake. And many people still have this mindset today.
to get rid of our chains/NWO.... here is the only way
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=...00x300.jpg&f=1
Scientism and Science are different things. Examples: Climate change is scientism. A political agenda attempting to justify itself by claiming a scientific basis where none exists. Internal combustion engine is engineering with a scientific explanation based on observation, repeatability and falsifiability.
Which one is cosmology?
Goes on to explain phenomena is from solar flare buildup of electrostatic potential. Limited admission?Quote:
The incredible sparking soil on the MOON: NASA reveals solar storms can cause 'miniature lightning strikes'
- Study found sparks occur in frigid, permanently shadowed regions near poles
- May possibly produce 'sparks' that could vaporize and melt the soil
- Could have as much effect on the surface as a meteoroid impact
Powerful solar storms can produce sparks on the moon's surface, NASA has revealed.
A new study has found the sparks occur in the frigid, permanently shadowed regions near the lunar poles, and may possibly produce 'sparks' that could vaporize and melt the soil.
NASA said it could have as much effect on the surface as a meteoroid impact
About 10 percent of this gardened layer has been melted or vaporized by meteoroid impacts,' said Andrew Jordan of the University of New Hampshire, Durham.
'We found that in the moon's permanently shadowed regions, sparks from solar storms could melt or vaporize a similar percentage.'
Much more here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...g-strikes.html
why everybody should be interested in the genius of Walter Russell and co
PS: explosion is RED, implosion is BLUE, these 2 colors are identified as masculine and feminine respectively in ancient knowledge. So what does it mean? It simply means BLUE oriented concepts are NURTURING, positive for the environment.
Cavitation - Sonoluminescence - Implosion Technology - Sacred Sciences
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8HO5DGZcM0
that is an interesting article. Is the mainstream preparing for the EU take over? I dont think so but they will allow bits, here and there, of its theory to infiltrate minds.
In my humble opinion scientism is characterized by a mindset willing to stubbornly apply outdated models to newer data. That is the challenge of the EU for example.
Outdated models are claimed to have passed the test of the scientific method but when you look at the long term, such "beliefs" are eroding and begin to dispel serious problems. Until any new data validated by the academic cartel sets in, scientists will not recognize anything and regard out of the box thinkers as heretics.
We may have sometimes the impression that science achieves wonders but when looking at the whole picture, our environment is on the brink of being completely destroyed and much of the real science is kept secret (occulted) to benefit the *art of killing*. The consequences of scientism... just ask DARPA. Nothing new under the sun, society has always functioned like this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glass
Tesla’s Dynamic Theory of Gravity
http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/...ry-of-gravity/
Good marketing ploy. Calling it Tesla's when it's not...Quote:
Originally Posted by BarnkleBob
Interesting. My entire career is to cavitate joints.Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
there are only two choices: blue vs red types of energies. And I am sure that DARPA is already very advanced in the blue type one. Oil is a "red energy" for cavemen, justifying war.
But I am not expecting from you to endorse the fibonacci model for engines. Too much magic here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
Interesting why you have this propensity to choose positions for your perceived enemies that are contrary to your own. Maybe it makes your discussion more interesting? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
You certainly carry around a huge chip on your shoulder, and you are probably one of the most unbalanced people I know of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
con•trar•i•an (kənˈtrɛər i ən)
n.
1. a person who takes an opposing view, esp. one who rejects the majority opinion, as in economic matters.
adj.
2. disagreeing with or proceeding against current opinion or established practice.
I wonder what it is called when a person is contrarian to him-/her-self?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
Hypocrisy? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
that is your perception... I didnt see anything wise in the line you responded.
But there is progress because now you are starting to use the vocabulary I hold dear. I am influencing your thoughts in a good way it seems
the day you start positing out of the box materials, instead of always going mainstream, and I will give you undivided attention. waiting
Unbalanced... talk of yourself , anything that doesnt fit the rational 3D scientific method is associated with magic. LOL.
you are so mainstream, narrow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
instead, debate the EU, which you claim to be unworkable.
when are you going to acknowledge that newton and einstein theories are about to fall off a cliff.
so be my guess
the theories I am defending have been out there for millennia and I feel bad you never gave them any attention.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
I never claimed it unworkable. I asked to explain the source of neutrinos if the sun is not nuclear. But like anything I've ever asked you, you skirt around and never provide an answer. Why would this be any different?Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
I also want DATA to explain the EU theory. No conjecture. EVIDENCE!! Even Metaphysics can be explained in math, it's how Quantum physics have shown there is a master vibration throughout the universe. I take absolutely nothing anyone says at face value, I want proof. Without proof or evidence all you have is a theory you cannot explain or replicate.
ares, I dont think you are that interested in the EU, if you were your postings would demonstrate that you did watched much of the EU materials available online. Instead you want an evidence presented to you.
The EU may or may not be fully complete at this stage (but all what I heard made sense to me so far) and this is something that should allow you to leave the intellectual door open instead of bashing.
I dont have any particular material in mind right now to answer your question BUT know that anybody following the laws of electricity will always be proven right at some point down the road. Because electricity is the blood of the Universe.
Quantum physics has its detractors too, I think neuro is one of them. But quantum physics depends on computers, while living geometry does not. Something to chew on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
There you go again making contrary positions for me again, for you to discuss against. For along time I actually thought you were intentionally lying about me, when you made up these positions I actually don't hold. But I start to think you are not doing this with the knowledge that they are lies. You probably believe you know me, when you are conversing with the demon inside you.Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
Ares the correct term would be Schizophrenia.
ahahaha... you ran out of arguments, that is all I am seeing here. Yes, you cannot deal with metaphysics, you are ALLERGIC to it. You associate it with nonsensical magic or voodoo. That was all I meant and you know it.
You just speak nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuro
I asked to explain the source of neutrinos if the sun is not nuclear.
RE:
well it occurred to me that I may have the beginning of an answer. Walter Russell,(possibly the main father of the EU theory) contends that Light, replicates, photons do not motion. Light does not travel. He has a chapter explaining this.
SECRET OF LIGHT
Chapter XII. Light cannot be seen, it can only be known. Light is still.
Light Does Not Travel
The speed with which light presumably travels is 186,400 miles per second. The distance between stars is so great that the speed of light is computed as light years, for the distance computed by lesser units of time would yield figures so great that they would be meaningless.
Light only seems to travel. It is but one more of the countless illusions caused by wave motion. Waves of the ocean seem to traverse the ocean but they only appear to do so, for waves are pistons in the universal engines, and pistons operate up and down. Wave pistons of light, or of the ocean, operate radially and spirally inward and outward, toward and away from gravity.
Waves of light do not travel. They reproduce each other from wave field to wave field of space. The planes of zero curvature, which bound all wave fields, act as mirrors to reflect light from one field into another. This sets up an appearance of light as traveling, which is pure illusion...
https://lightspeedzero.wordpress.com...alter-russell/
And I believe he is correct. And that could explain why our atheistic academia would hate this to be known. Light has extremely mysterious properties that eventually end academia itself.
Where are the neutrinos? they replicate and vanish simultaneously...
light cannot be seen but be known.EnLightenment
Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
here is a man who has some knowlege of neutrinos. I only have a high school education, no physics, 2 years of algebra, basic chemistry, introduction to organic chemistry some biology and botany, not qualified to argue in this debateQuote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
http://hitoshi.berkeley.edu/neutrino/PhysicsWorld.pdf
https://s19.postimg.org/r4as9r7oj/IMG_1448.png
https://s19.postimg.org/up6nszc83/IMG_1449.png
https://s19.postimg.org/yzlbokhb7/IMG_1450.png
https://s19.postimg.org/70r5xpfoj/IMG_1451.png
hey thanks for sharing, and please do not be discouraged from posting
but the higgs boson, God's particle, has an interesting % of detractors too, some say that higgs experiment was a hoax. I personally dont know (I do not have a Phd and was studying biology to become a veterinarian for 3 years, until philosophy, metaphysics and writing became my passions) but also know we cannot trust mainstream academia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uy5nMXK9s4k
Quote:
Originally Posted by monty
from naturalphilosophy.org.. without a resistance nothing progresses. well I just found a new site that I am going to promote in my doc. Thanks a lot to you all
==========================
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/sit...ng-768x525.jpg
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/sit...ez-768x524.jpg
http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/sit...er-768x552.jpg
"If I only had a neutrino" is the tinman argument of standard physics.
It ignores all other obligatory requirements of theory, or having themselves a brain...;)
Some physicists say there are no neutrinos. That what is detected in these neutrino detectors in mountains deep is actually ultra-high energy gamma rays...Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
http://www.autodynamics.org/neutrinos-home/
from the walter russell link in my earlier post... and you wonder about his success? One doesnt find this type of knowledge in the mainstream. So let alone expecting the EU to be greenlighted by the mainstream
=================
Man likewise cannot see darkness. The nerves of his eyes, which sense motion, slow down to a rate of vibration that he can no longer “feel.” Man is so accustomed to the idea that he actually sees light in various intensities illuminating various substances to greater or lesser degree that it is difficult for him to realize that his own senses are but acting as mirrors to reflect various intensities of wave motion. But that is all that is happening.
Every electrically conditioned thing in Nature reflects the vibrations of every other thing, to fulfill its desire to synchronize its vibrations with every other thing. All matter is the motion of light. All motion is expressed in waves. All light waves are mirrors that reflect each other’s condition unto the farthermost star.
This is an electrically conditioned wave universe. All wave conditions are forever seeking oneness. For this reason all sensation responds to all other sensation.....
Light is all there is in the spiritual universe of knowing, and simulation of that light in opposite extensions is all there is in the electric wave universe of sensing. The simulation of light in matter is not light. There is no light in matter.
Perhaps the confusion which attends this idea would be lessened if we classify everything concerning the spiritual universe, such as life, intelligence, truth, power, knowledge and balance as being the One Light of Knowing, and everything concerning matter and motion as being the two simulated lights of thinking.
Thinking expresses knowing in matter but matter does not think, nor does it know.
Thinking also expresses life, truth, idea, power and balance by recording the ideas of those qualities in the two lights of matter in motion, but matter does not live, nor is it truth, balance or idea, even though it simulates those spiritual qualities.
Man’s confusion concerning this differentiation lies in his, long assumption of the reality of matter. His assumption that his body is his Self, that his knowledge is in his brain, and that he lives and dies because his body integrates and disintegrates, has been so fundamental a part of his thinking that it is difficult for him to reverse his thinking to the fact that matter is but motion and has no reality beyond simulating reality.
The light which we think we see is but motion. We do not see light. We feel the wave vibrations set up by the motion that simulates light, but the motion of electric waves that simulate light is not that which it simulates.
:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
Asking for EVIDENCE is not mainstream, it's basic human understanding, especially when it comes to something new. Like I have asked previously, SHOW ME THE MATH, as well as the source for the neutrino's. Gamma rays are different as they are ionized radiation while neutrino's are not.
Here is the differences between Gamma Rays and Neutrinos:
Neutrino's:
Types 3 – electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino
Mass ≤ 0.120 eV/c2 (95% confidence level, sum of 3 flavors)[1]
Electric charge 0 e
Spin 1/2
Weak isospin LH: +1/2, RH: 0
Weak hypercharge LH: -1, RH: 0
B − L −1
X −3
Gamma Rays:
Gamma rays, X-rays, visible light, and radio waves are all forms of electromagnetic radiation. The only difference is the frequency and hence the energy of those photons. Gamma rays are generally the most energetic of these, although a broad overlap with X-ray energies occurs. An example of gamma ray production follows:
First 60
Co
decays to excited 60
Ni
by beta decay emission of an electron of 0.31 MeV. Then the excited 60
Ni
decays to the ground state (see nuclear shell model) by emitting gamma rays in succession of 1.17 MeV followed by 1.33 MeV. This path is followed 99.88% of the time:
60
27Co
→ 60
28Ni*
+
e−
+
ν
e +
γ
+ 1.17 MeV
60
28Ni*
→ 60
28Ni
+
γ
+ 1.33 MeV
Another example is the alpha decay of 241
Am
to form 237
Np
; which is followed by gamma emission. In some cases, the gamma emission spectrum of the daughter nucleus is quite simple, (e.g. 60
Co
/60
Ni
) while in other cases, such as with (241
Am
/237
Np
and 192
Ir
/192
Pt
), the gamma emission spectrum is complex, revealing that a series of nuclear energy levels exist.
Or for visual representation of Gamma Ray source:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...Scheme.svg.png
I have asked for evidence to support the E.U. theory and get told to watch a video. I've watch about 15-20 minutes of it (my time for watching these types of videos is limited) but have not seen any evidence presented just theory.
It is of course clear that there is an emission of these particles coming from the sun (as can be seen in the General path they are traveling). However the question is whether the emissions detected is from ultra high energy gamma rays or from low energy neutrino's. Both have very low likelihood of interaction with matter and penetrate deeply. I don't know whether they would have very different behaviors in a fog chamber when interacting. I would imagine so since we are talking multiples of magnitudes difference in energy levels...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares