Geocentrism

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

That actually looks very promising after having looked at Part 1. Getting rid of black holes, dark matter and dark energy does it for me.

---

Quote:

---

The search presented in this paper targets mostly very heavy monopoles, which cannot achieve relativistic speeds. “With the null detection, we now close the window on a connection between such hypothetical monopoles and dark matter. The resulting constraints on the flux are so low that monopoles cannot constitute the dominant amount of dark matter in the universe,” says Sebastian Schoenen, an IceCube researcher at RWTH Aachen University. Following these results, only monopoles with a mass larger than the so-called Planck mass could be responsible for a large fraction of dark matter, but this mass is above the scale predicted by GUT theories

---

http://icecube.wisc.edu/news/view/202



Physicists create synthetic magnetic monopole predicted more than 80 years ago


(Phys.org) —Nearly 85 years after pioneering theoretical physicist Paul Dirac predicted the possibility of their existence, an international collaboration led by Amherst College Physics Professor David S. Hall '91 and Aalto University (Finland) Academy Research Fellow Mikko Möttönen has created, identified and photographed synthetic magnetic monopoles in Hall's laboratory on the Amherst campus. The groundbreaking accomplishment paves the way for the detection of the particles in nature, which would be a revolutionary development comparable to the discovery of the electron.

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachme...tid=6832&stc=1
Due to the fact that every whirl carries an artificial magnetic field, their creation or destruction occurs at the point of merging. "This means that an artificial magnetic monopole has to sit on this point," describes Prof. Rosch, "whenever two magnetic whirls merge in the experiment, an artificial magnetic monopole has flown through surface."

http://phys.org/news/2013-05-artific...monopoles.html

Seriously The Primer Field dude, if indeed it is his theory, deserves the Nobel Prize in Physics, but since his breakthrough contradicts many of the previous Nobel prize laureates he will probably never get it. But his work on photones (part 3) is just astonishing in its common sense explanation after more than a century of madness! Damn I haven't been this excited re anything in physics and astrophysics ever before. On to part 4!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuro

Damn I haven't been this excited re anything in physics and astrophysics ever before. On to part 4!

---

Possible he was since compromised by tptb, tranquilized by payments or vanished. Maybe, He was overly excited about it also, and his press to put it into action was harder than imagined?

Nothing has come since as far as i can see. i don't think a 4th part is coming, but oh well someone else will pickup on it.

Apparently some theory was based on a Walter Russells work.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

Possible he was since compromised by tptb, tranquilized by payments or vanished. Maybe, He was overly excited about it also, and his press to put it into action was harder than imagined?

Nothing has come since as far as i can see. i don't think a 4th part is coming, but oh well someone else will pickup on it.

Apparently some theory was based on a Walter Russells work.

---

Yeah I just saw that 4th part was put on hold. I am disappointed about that.

More Primer Field structures...?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rENyyRwxpHo#t=80

I

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horn

More Primer Field structures...?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rENyyRwxpHo#t=80

---

It looks that way! Where is David LaPoint? seems to have disappeared off the end of the Universe in a handbasket... Damn his work on magnetism, galaxies, pulsars, supernova remnants and photones is nothing but groundbreaking, but part 4 was on how matter is held together. Which was announced in the beginning of 2013!

Was following a post of his in a thread of thunderbolts forums.

http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/p...=9221&start=45

I got to about page 7 and my brain suffered electrostatic discharge. :)

Bone for thread topic,

Quote:

---

In 1926 a very ambitious ring interferometry experiment was set up by Albert Michelson and Henry Gale. The aim was to find out whether the rotation of the Earth has an effect on the propagation of light in the vicinity of the Earth. The Michelson–Gale–Pearson experiment was a very large ring interferometer, (a perimeter of 1.9 kilometer), large enough to detect the angular velocity of the Earth. The outcome of the experiment was that the angular velocity of the Earth as measured by astronomy was confirmed to within measuring accuracy. The ring interferometer of the Michelson-Gale experiment was not calibrated by comparison with an outside reference (which was not possible, because the setup was fixed to the Earth). From its design it could be deduced where the central interference fringe ought to be if there would be zero shift. The measured shift was 230 parts in 1000, with an accuracy of 5 parts in 1000. The predicted shift was 237 parts in 1000.

Practical uses

The Sagnac effect is employed in current technology. One use is in inertial guidance systems. Ring laser gyroscopes are extremely sensitive to rotations, which need to be accounted for if an inertial guidance system is to return accurate results. The ring laser also can detect the sidereal day, which can also be termed "mode 1". Global navigation systems, such as GPS, GLONASS, COMPASS or Galileo, need to take the rotation of the Earth into account in the procedures of using radio signals to synchronize clocks.


Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/sagnac-...#ixzz3ExBBRneh

---

Speed of light illusion?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy_9J_c9Kss

Interesting video on magnetism, but am not sure what it really means. As to Sagnac and Michelson-Gale, this is covered quite a bit in Galileo Was Wrong. Both are seen asn challenging reltaivity, and spporting geocentrism.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnQPublic

The movie is not trying to prove geocentrism, only discuss evidence challenging the Copernican Principle.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JohnQPublic

Interesting video on magnetism, but am not sure what it really means. As to Sagnac and Michelson-Gale, this is covered quite a bit in Galileo Was Wrong. Both are seen asn challenging reltaivity, and spporting geocentrism.

---

The observations with Sagnac and Michelson-Gale may work well to challenge Relative Theory,

while basing itself in heliocentrism.