new shooting: Newtown, Conn. details breaking

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Is Hoax Fatique in the DSM?

---

@Dachsie--I'm definitely feeling hoax fatigue. I spent a lot of hours on this one and it sickens me to see they have gotten away with it. I give a lot of credit to Fetzer for all he has done to expose this.

I've also been wondering if people are feeling burned out and fatigued from all of these psyops, hoaxes, and staged deceptions. A few weeks ago, I checked in over at Clues Forum and they didn't have anything on any of the recent hoaxes. I remember back in the day of the Sandy Hook hoax and the Boston Marathon bombing hoax, that forum was very active in exposing all of the media fakery. Since they've been doing these every few weeks, maybe people just got sick of them. There have been so many of them--they did a ton of them under the Kenyan and are still doing them under Trump. I guess they are going to keep staging these until they get what they want (guns)

I guess I am a teacher or a preacher at heart, or maybe just a frustrated file clerk, and I wish I could teach a class on 9-11 101 intro, 102 intermediate, 103 advanced.

I get frustrated that Dr. Fetzer has turned himself into basically a news, all national and international news stories of the day, reporter. His Wednesday evening Raw Deal show appears to have been turned in to his reading and commenting on various news items and takes no call-ins.

And few of the forums really discuss any well known hoax event in any depth. People just vent here and there, hit or miss. I feel that we all have a lot in common about what we believe about an event at least at the intro level. Then, with fair objective discussion further beliefs can be examined and some ruled out.

Instead minor little scuffles keep coming up because of different takes on 9-11 or whatever event but I feel what if a discussion could be approached logically from the most universally believed ideas, that would prevent people from getting vexed and dropping out of the discussion.

Speaking of Clues forum.

I tried posting there a couple of times but then went away when I tried to see what their answer was to the question...

"Where does Clues Forum say the Towers went?'

After much digging I came to the conclusion that they believe a big Hollywood type smoke generating machine was set up all round, and then all the buildings were "taken down in the usual "controlled demolition" way, except maybe without the smoke machine for Building 7.

The fact that that was so hidden on their forum told me a lot.

They did a very good video a few years back about how the victims from WTC part of 9-11 were photographically created and faked. It was really outstanding but I could not find that video link anywhere on the forum even though I posted asking for link on the forum.

Clues did so much good work but they went wrong a certain critical junctures and now they have faded into an inactive board.
One thing they would not have a bit of is saying that the Js had anything to do with it. Another thing they did was claim that absolutely no one died or was injured who was in the WTC buildings, I mean zero people.

Sandy Hoax woke me up to the Gladio-2 gun grab psyops in USA, beyond what I'd previously thought plausible. & Aurora/Batman psyop went down only a few mos b4 SH, which I reviewed with new eyes... at the time I just thought the 'anomalies' people noted re that 'event' were... odd, but I hadn't got my head around the whole thing being hoaxed, yet.

Then there was the synthetic "sandy hoax truthers vs re-bunkers rift", which was really demoralizing/fatiguing/enlightening all at once!

Nowdaze I seldom/never put in the kind of 'hours' I did with SH. Standing rule of thumb remains, if (((MSM))) goes wall to wall, + current POTUS tweets, + immediate "victims" & pols/pundits calls for anti-2A/surveillance/BigPharma "solutions" action... then the latest deception of the week was hoax/psyop/ff. :rolleyes:

"Nowdaze I seldom/never put in the kind of 'hours' I did with SH."

I put in the big hours of study beginning on 9-11-01 on that event. Do not know why I was hungry to read and take in anything I could on that subject but that is what I did. Dr. Fetzer started coming on Dr. Stan Monteith's radio shows, of which I was a regular listener, and even though the two were far apart on the Left - Right scale, that is what got me on to Dr. Fetzer.

I gradually spent less time on subsequent false events and just observed all the new fake 9-11 truth groups and people coming on the scene.

Here is one little jewel of enlightenment I came to about 9-11 just a few weeks ago.

Immediately in the days following 9-11, I was taking in Alex Jones and local patriots knowing 9-11 was fake and searching all around for tidbits of new truth info.
Alex and other internet radio had a truther guy on several times and his name was...

Jared Israel. (laughter here appropriate)

We all held on to this guy's every word. He was very serious and intelligent and his theory was that our military did a stand-down.
He had all these impressing facts about all the 4 planes and their take-off times and other FAA specific sounding data. We were all wowed.


Now this guy was a sophisticated early crisis actor in the pay of the 9-11 perps. They gave the guy his name because if a Jewish guy is explaining that 9-11 was a hoax and that our U S military stood down, then that made it doubly sure that he was telling the whole truth because we know Js are the real truther patriots.

The Harley Guy was another early crisis actor of 9-11 chronology.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

"Nowdaze I seldom/never put in the kind of 'hours' I did with SH."

I put in the big hours of study beginning on 9-11-01 on that event.

---

Yeah I didn't mention 911 truth in my previous comment but I was a truther since late '03; & the old members here know I joined the predecessor to this GS.US forum, GoldIsMoney (#one) since '04, banging on 911. Was hip to London 7/7, & the Madrid event a few mos later... basically the whole joo-orchestrated warrenterra hoax... but was used to them framing scary muzzies, all in the name of their Clash of Civilizations - Greater Izzy Plan - JWO agenda.

So it's weird in hindsight that I was still slow on the uptake in 2012/13 when their domestic gun-grab psyops really took off. :(??

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amanda

I guess they will continue to get away with this hoax and all the other hoaxes. Holohoax still running strong...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Is Hoax Fatigue in the DSM?

---

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/46/43...62eb58317a.jpg

I have a degree in (((Psychology))) and am very familiar with DSM. Earlier DSMs once considered, for example, Gender Dysphoria a mental illness and now today actually promote all the recent perverted "Gender" nonsense.

Like PatColo, I was first awakened during the GIM1 days, and logically surmised that all we had to do was inform and alert our fellow goyim to our jews-control-everything Reality to end it. Since then, I meticulously collected over 32GB of authentic evidence over the years from all the usual "conspiracy" and "exposed hoax" websites that have all since been totally disappeared from the internet. Notice that you three very serious very dedicated researchers (also Monty) are at this ghost town GSUS.US containment forum where less than fifty real people actually read what you post? There isn't another real Truther website out there now. Not one. Or you would be there.

For me....4chan and their CLOWN WORLD meme is the only mentally healthy coping stance remaining to us goyim. I regularly re-post this Larson cartoon above that makes my point perfectly....

:(??

Jim Fetzer and Lenny Pozner Testify During Day 2 of Sandy Hook Trial

JURY IS NOW DELIBERATING—WILL SOON BE UPDATED

By

*Kevin Barrett

October 15, 2019

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/10/15/fetzer-pozner/

James Fetzer appears Tuesday with one of his attorneys in Dane County Circuit Court. A jury awarded Leonard Pozner $450,000 in damages after his attorneys argued Fetzer’s writing contributed to his post-traumatic stress disorder.
Yesterday, a jury decided a “conspiracy theorist” must pay the father of a boy killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook shootings $450,000 for falsely claiming the father circulated fabricated copies of his son’s death certificate


moon rock books

https://madison.com/wsj/news/local/c...be9f26592.html

The Raw Deal With Jim Fetzer 2019.10.16
https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2019/10...-20191016.html

Today: Latest political bullshit (He mentioned the SH verdict 20 minutes before the end of the show. He also mentioned 1775 earlier.)

64k CF*Download
https://ln2.sync.com/dl/c6244c1e0/dx...wryg5-4rb6pk6d

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=196498

The Legal Lynching of a Truth-Seeker: Jim Fetzer’s Stalinist-Style Show Trial

By wmw_admin on October 18, 2019
Kevin Barrett – The Unz Review Oct 17, 2019

Part 1: Tuesday at the Trial: Just the Facts

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/word...al-768x477.jpg

Lenny Pozner’s defamation suit against Jim Fetzer concluded Tuesday, October 15, day two of the penalty phase of the trial. (Disclaimer: I have been friends with Jim since 2006, and though I don’t always agree with him, I respect his courage and sincerity. It was an honor to have lunch with him on this, the most critical day of the trial.)
Pozner won the first phase last June when the court determined that four of Fetzer’s statements alleging a fake death certificate for Noah Pozner were defamatory; then on September 13 Fetzer was found in contempt of court for sharing images of Pozner’s deposition. Fetzer argues that he shared the images, which the court had deemed confidential, as part of his legal defense research. Fetzer claims the images show that the Lenny Pozner in the deposition is not the same person depicted in at least some previous publicly circulated images of Lenny Pozner.

Pozner asked for one million dollars in damages from Fetzer. The jury’s job was to determine an award amount, which theoretically could range anywhere between zero and one million dollars. After almost four hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict of $450,000 in damages.

The penalty phase of the trial began Monday with opening arguments and a lengthy videotaped deposition of a forensic psychologist, who asserted that Pozner suffers from PTSD as a result of Fetzer’s four defamatory statements. The forensic psychologist, who was presumably hired by Pozner’s legal team, predictably supported Pozner’s narrative: After suffering the loss of his son Noah at Sandy Hook, Pozner says, he experienced PTSD for more than a year, only to have his recovery cut short, and his symptoms exacerbated, by his discovery that online Sandy Hook skeptics were claiming that the school shooting was a hoax in which nobody died. Since then, Pozner says, he has been waging an online battle against Sandy Hook skeptics (he calls them “hoaxers”) which has kept him mired in PTSD. Much or most of the suffering he has experienced, Pozner suggests, is the fault of Jim Fetzer, whom Pozner and his lawyers are casting as the kingpin and prime inspiration of the Sandy Hook skeptics’ movement.
Fetzer’s legal team questioned the “Fetzer caused my PTSD” claim. While acknowledging that Pozner would have suffered PTSD from the loss of his son in December 2012, they suggested that it was not entirely Fetzer’s fault that Pozner has been re-traumatizing himself by spending much of his time since 2014 combing the internet for material that he says traumatizes him and trying to get it removed. Fetzer’s team’s cross-examination of the psychologist pointed out that normally PTSD sufferers avoid stimuli that reawaken the trauma.

The afternoon session featured back-to-back testimony from Lenny Pozner and Jim Fetzer, both called to the stand and questioned by the plaintiff’s (Pozner’s) lawyers. In front of a huge, adorable Noah Pozner picture projected on the screen, Lenny Pozner recounted dropping off his son Noah at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012. He described seeing his son’s body at the funeral a few days later. He said that in 2014 he encountered the online claims of Sandy Hook skeptics and tried to engage with them in a cordial and transparent way, but soon began to feel harassed and increasingly upset at their claims that his son Noah had never existed. He said he has persistently tried to get such claims removed from the internet as a way of defending his son.

Below are reconstructions from my notes on Pozner’s testimony. The notes were cut short by a bailiff ordering me to shut down my laptop, since I was not one of the two mainstream journalists who had been approved for electronic devices.

Lenny Pozner:

Noah was a twin to my youngest daughter. The last time I saw Noah would have been on the morning of December 14. I dropped my three kids off at the car line.
(At the funeral) his forehead was the only part that was not covered (due to injuries).

I became aware of Mr. Fetzer in mid-2014. (Asked if he had read Jim Fetzer’s edited book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook): No, I haven’t read the book, just the parts about me.
I felt it said a lot of ugly things. I wanted to defend my son. I needed to be his voice. (Answering question): I’m concerned for my safety, my family’s safety. I’m concerned for my children’s future, how they could be treated.

I was concerned someone would do something…something bad.

(Asked why he thought Fetzer’s four defamatory statements had damaged his reputation): It causes people to believe I lied about my son’s death, that my son didn’t die….
(Asked how he has been affected in terms of fearing contact with people):

I’m very cautious about what I reveal…I never know how people might react…people might accuse me of being this villain that Mr. Fetzer portrayed me to be.

(Asked whether he held Jim Fetzer responsible for the criminal acts of Lucy Richards, who left obscene, threatening messages on Pozner’s answering machine):
Lucy Richards was sentenced to prison for making death threats against me. (But why hold Fetzer responsible?) It was the way she said what she said, and the way she talked about Noah, and about me…she accused me of faking my son’s death, hiding my son, that he’s not really dead. Part of her sentence is she’s not supposed to read (Fetzer’s) website.

Jim Fetzer, called to the stand by the plaintiff’s lawyers as a hostile witness, was questioned about his responsibility for the four allegedly defamatory statements, all of which involved claims that the copy of Noah Pozner’s death certificate circulated by Lenny Pozner in 2014 was inauthentic—claims Fetzer still argues were accurate. Fetzer said that he (and in some cases collaborators including co-authors, editors, and publishers) were indeed responsible for publishing those statements, which were not defamatory, but truthful. Dane County Circuit Judge Frank Remington immediately ordered the jury out of the room and admonished Fetzer that the court had already ruled that those statements were defamatory and that no further impugning the findings of the court would be tolerated. When the jury filed back into the courtroom, Judge Remington ordered them to ignore Fetzer’s statement.

Toward late afternoon the defense decided not to call two witnesses, Tony Mead and Kelley Watt, who had traveled from Florida to testify. Both sides offered closing arguments.

Though I missed the closing arguments (I had to pick up my wife after a dental appointment) a friend and colleague who wishes to remain anonymous summarized them for me. What follows is based on what my source, who was present in the courtroom as a spectator, recounted afterward.

Pozner’s attorneys made broad emotional appeals, saying Pozner has experienced pain and suffering due to losing his son and then having the wounds re-opened by his battles with online Sandy Hook skeptics whose ideas, they claim, are derived from Fetzer’s book and web postings.

Fetzer’s attorneys argued more narrowly on two key issues. They asked why the psychologist expert witness who diagnosed Pozner with Fetzer-induced PTSD did not estimate any monetary damages from that PTSD. Nor, in fact, did Pozner or his legal team. No claims were made about the dollar value of any losses in earning ability Pozner may or may not have suffered. There was no claim whatsoever of any loss of income or medical bills.

Fetzer’s team also argued that Pozner’s side had not presented any convincing evidence supporting the claim that Fetzer’s defamatory statements about the death certificate had caused Lucy Richards or any other unstable Sandy Hook skeptic to harass Pozner; no evidence was presented that the harassers even read Fetzer’s defamatory statements, much less acted on them.

Fetzer’s lawyers reminded the jury to set aside their personal feelings and emotions: They shouldn’t decide on the basis of whether they like or dislike Fetzer or agree or disagree with him. Damages are not supposed to be emotional or punitive, Fetzer’s attorneys said, but are only related to actual dollar-value loss (which had not been demonstrated).

The jury retired to consider their verdict. A few hours later, well into the evening, they ordered pizza. A few mainstream journalists, including a New York Times reporter, remained in the courtroom to await the verdict. The jury returned the verdict after about four hours of deliberation:

Jury Awards Sandy Hook Father $450,000 damages for defamation

Part 2: The Opinion Piece (Assuming We Are Still Allowed to Have Opinions)

Tuesday was the final day of Jim Fetzer’ defense against Lenny Pozner’s libel lawsuit. I attended and published a “just the facts” report that evening (republished with minor changes above). At almost the same moment I published my initial report, the jury came back with a verdict awarding close to half a million dollars to Lenny “Jim Fetzer gave me PTSD” Pozner.

Now it’s time for an opinion piece. And as much as I sympathize with Mr. Pozner, assuming his account is accurate, my opinion is that Jim Fetzer got a raw deal…and that the reverberations of this case will be disastrous unless it is overturned.

The whole courtroom drama was carefully scripted and controlled to ensure that the jury, as well as onlookers and reporters, got to hear only one side of the story. Fetzer was never allowed to present his defense.

Jim Fetzer’s defense is simple: Truth is an absolute defense against libel, and Fetzer published statements alleged by Posner to be libelous because he believed them to be true. What’s more, he still believes them to be true. Whether he is right I do not know. But I do know he is sincere in his beliefs.

I watched Jim Fetzer take the stand, swear to tell “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”—and then watched him silenced and admonished, and the jury hurriedly chased out of the room, when he tried to speak the truth as he saw it. Jim merely said he still believed his “libelous” statements were true. Asserting the contrary would be a lie. Not saying anything would be a lie by omission. So he was admonished and threatened by the court for the sin of not lying on the witness stand!

As I understand it, at no point during the two phases of the trial was Jim Fetzer ever allowed to present to a jury the evidence that led him to believe that Sandy Hook was an Operation Gladio style psy-op (which those who have read Daniel Ganser’s NATO’s Secret Armies know is entirely plausible) and that there was no actual school shooting (which does seem farfetched, but stranger things have happened). How could he present a truth defense without showing the evidence that led him to believe his allegedly libelous statements were in fact truthful?

According to the 7th Amendment of the Constitution:

IN SUITS AT COMMON LAW, WHERE THE VALUE IN CONTROVERSY SHALL EXCEED TWENTY DOLLARS, THE RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE PRESERVED…

Yet as I understand it—and perhaps someone can correct me in the comments if I am wrong—Jim Fetzer was never given the right of trial by jury to determine whether he had or had not committed libel. Instead, an obviously biased judge presided over that crucial first phase of the case, denying Jim’s Constitutionally-guaranteed right to a trial by jury. The same judge prevented Jim from presenting his truth defense, which would have entailed giving Jim full scope to present the evidence that led him to believe his statements were truthful and therefore not libelous.

It was only in the second, penalty phase of the trial that a jury was convened. And during that phase, not only was Jim prevented from presenting his truth defense to the jury, he was prohibited from even mentioning it, or from telling the truth about his beliefs.

Meanwhile the Pozner team was allowed to engage in shameless emotional manipulation of the jury. They even projected a huge adorable picture of Noah Pozner on the screen as the backdrop to the crucial back-to-back testimony of Lenny Pozner and Jim Fetzer! (Jim Fetzer, of course, was not allowed to use the big screen to project images that raise questions about the official story of Sandy Hook—images that can be found in Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, but which were, along with all other evidence supporting Fetzer’s truth defense, in essence banned from the courtroom.)

Chilling Effect?

One of the most dangerous repercussions of Pozner-vs.-Fetzer is its potential chilling effect on free speech. The decision awarded more than half a million dollars in “damages” based on the premise that a book presenting an alternative interpretation of a historical event hurt someone’s feelings. There was no tangible connection between the “libelous” statements in the book and any actual damages—loss of income, medical bills, etc. It was all about emotions: “This tearjerking Hollywood-style courtroom spectacle has whipped us into tearful sympathy with Pozner and two minutes of hate for Fetzer. Let’s express our emotions with a damage award.”

Following the court’s logic, if a German-American’s feelings are hurt by a book portraying Germans as villains in World War II, why not sue the author for libel and ban the book? Why not drag the author into court—and refuse to allow him to present the reasons he thinks his anti-German interpretation of World War II is truthful? Of course that would never happen, since popular prejudices are in sync with hatred of Germany’s mythic villainy; the court would find ways to rig the process to support the popular prejudice.
So how about these more plausible examples: African-American plaintiffs sue publishers for hurting their feelings by publishing 19th-century texts that include libelous portrayals of blacks; the grandson of Lyndon Johnson sues authors who have hurt his feelings by arguing that LBJ participated in the JFK assassination coup; a father who lost a son in Iraq sues an antiwar author for hurting his feelings by asserting that the invasion of Iraq was a criminal war based on lies and that his dead son was a war criminal.

One can imagine an almost infinite number of possible “libel” cases along these lines. And while only a few are likely to actually happen, that is a few too many—because the chilling effect of such lawsuits will terrorize authors and publishers into avoiding controversial or unpopular historiography. This is precisely what the Bill of Rights, whose purpose is to protect controversial and disturbing speech about matters of public import, is supposed to prevent.

I have had my differences with Jim Fetzer on many issues, including Sandy Hook. Specifically, I think we should be very careful about asserting or insinuating “nobody died” theories about suspected false flag events, for reasons that should by now be obvious.

But this is bigger than Jim Fetzer and Sandy Hook. This is about saving the Bill of Rights, which is under attack today as never before. Regardless of whether Jim is right or wrong about Sandy Hook, regardless of how mistaken some of his approaches may have been, the outcome of Pozner v. Fetzer presents a clear and present danger to freedom of expression in the United States.

The process of Pozner v. Fetzer appears to have been rigged precisely for the purpose of engineering this controlled demolition of our Constitutional rights. It must be appealed and overturned.

CONTRIBUTE TO JIM FETZER’S LEGAL DEFENSE FUND

https://www.moonrockbooks.com/donate


Source

Posted in Sandy Hook Shooting | 5 Responses
wmw_admin

I am thankful to Dr. Kevin Barrett for this account.

Dr. Barrett says

"(Disclaimer: I have been friends with Jim since 2006, and though I don’t always agree with him, I respect his courage and sincerity. It was an honor to have lunch with him on this, the most critical day of the trial.)"

Yes, Dr. James Fetzer is our shining example of manly American marine courage. And yes, Dr. Fetzer is sincere.

But most importantly, Dr. Fetzer is sincerely right.

He speaks truth based on the absolute most complete data about the Sandy Hook event that is available. He bases is truth findings on facts, reason and logic. That is all we mere humans have, that is those of us who do not have the help of The Holy Spirit.

John 18:38

Pilate saith to him: What is truth? And when he said this, he went out again to the Jews, and saith to them: I find no cause in him.

But it is your custom that I release to you one prisoner at the Passover. So then, do you want me to release to you the King of the Jews?”…

And the Jews replied...

“Not this man,” they shouted, “but Barabbas!” (Now Barabbas was an insurrectionist.)…


Then cried they all again, saying: Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber. John 18:40

Dachsie-

Thanks for the update on this. It's so depressing. They get away with EVERYTHING.

Hoaxes are legal.

The Raw Deal With Jim Fetzer 2019.10.27

Today: Guest, Wolfgang Halbig (callers in hour 2)

64k CF Download

lifted from glp board:

OK I saw a thread that linked Dan Holmes, the guy in this video, to Nancy Lanza so I did some investigating.

A google image search of Nancy Lanza clearly shows a picture of the two cozying up together for a photo selfie.

There were reports that he was her boyfriend.

I also learned that he is a horny litle fucker and was reportedly caught by the police fucking some chick in pucblic. It was reported that he was doing some woman on an elevated platform of some kind in a parking lot on Church Hill road and they fell off and she became paralyzed. You can't make this shit up.

Well now we find the good stuff and the links to Bloomberg and the Sandy Hook role players.

Holmes is a childhood friend of Rob Cox who sold his media company to BLOOMBERG.

Rob Cox seated himself right next to Wolfgang Halbig at the Board of education meeting and was mocking Wolfgang.

Holmes is friends with Francine Wheeler who was the administrative assistant to Maureen White who is married to Steve Ratner the financial advisor to BLOOMBERG.

A kindergarten teacher's son was identified as the shooter. What a coincidence because kindergarten teacher, Janet Vollmer, has a son named Scott Vollmer who was the event manager for BLOOMBERG.

Holmes is friends with ALL YOUR OTHER FAVORITE SANDY HOOK PLAYERS TOO INCLUDING :

MONTE FRANK, the Wheelers, the Bardens. LENNY POZNER, Jeremy Richman, Tom Bittman, Mary Ann Jacob, Po Murray, John Vocket, Shannon Hicks,Lillian Bittman, Abbey Clements,

So this rather quirky dorky aw shucks landscaper who just happened to be interviewed by the media just so happens to be Nancy Lanza's boyfiend and connects many of the Sandy Hook players and Michael Bloomberg.

Hey Dan what did you say about Nancy lanza you lying little fucker?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFtp_xRYam4

Brilliant excavation work, Cheka.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Brilliant excavation work, Cheka.

---

wish i could take credit - but it came from the glp board

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cheka.

A google image search of Nancy Lanza clearly shows a picture of the two cozying up together for a photo selfie.

There were reports that he was her boyfriend.

---

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012...31_634x444.jpg

This is not the same guy as in the video above.

:rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Medical Examiner in Sandy Hook Massacre, Other Crimes Dies

---

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/artic...er-crimes-dies

Dr. Carver probably really did die of "natural causes."

The Raw Deal With Jim Fetzer 2020.02.02

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hebSdThsd...600/fetzer.jpg

Today: Guest, Alison Menard (Email: dinophile@gmail.com). Sandy Hook, Wolfgang Halbig etc.

64k CF Download

Very good show. Attorney Alison (Sonny), but not allowed to practice law because she is too much of a truth seeker, named off every FOIA request and every other of the many efforts Wolfgang Halbig has made to investigate different aspects of Sandy Hook and what became of them. The Florida Lake County sheriff is just as crooked as the Connecticut gang.

Anyone who does not understand what a farce Sandy Hook was after listening to that show is mentally ill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Very good show. Attorney Alison (Sonny), but not allowed to practice law because she is too much of a truth seeker, named off every FOIA request and every other of the many efforts Wolfgang Halbig has made to investigate different aspects of Sandy Hook and what became of them. The Florida Lake County sheriff is just as crooked as the Connecticut gang.

Anyone who does not understand what a farce Sandy Hook was after listening to that show is mentally ill.

---

Yes, Sandy Hook was a giant HOAX!!

Also, I have a lot of respect for that lawyer-definitely a truth-teller!! She's the same person who spoke out on this thread I started:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...h-Dignity-Hoax (Britanny was her niece and she's certain the whole right to death thing was a HOAX!!)

More here: https://therealcolorado.blogspot.com...ead-niece.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Amanda

Yes, Sandy Hook was a giant HOAX!!

Also, I have a lot of respect for that lawyer-definitely a truth-teller!! She's the same person who spoke out on this thread I started:

http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthre...h-Dignity-Hoax (Britanny was her niece and she's certain the whole right to death thing was a HOAX!!)

More here: https://therealcolorado.blogspot.com...ead-niece.html

---

____________

The two photos of her own of her niece, one shown looks Hispanic, second not shown in article

https://app.box.com/s/7lfi5guv8x0ttnbffdsxgx2jluqha6d9

person longing on bench has very white skin and does not look Hispanic to me. In fact that first picture looks like a young Hispanic girl I have seen in other psyops as part of completely different stories.

I pasted the entire story again here minus the photos and videos. Just have a feeling Dr. Tracy's site is in jeopardy of being messed with again and wanted to preserve this story.

Alison Maynard focuses on "mental health" angle of psyops, where she gives less emphasis to the gun control angle as Dr. Fetzer does.

The link to the original story about Brittany took me to https://memoryholeblog.com/

Dr. Tracy's website is https://memoryholeblog.org/

I found the article you reference at

https://memoryholeblog.org/?s=Brittany+Maynard

...https://memoryholeblog.org/2018/09/2...-undead-niece/...

Dr. Tracy changed his url to dot org from dot com in 2018 after being offline for 16 month hiatus when fraudster Leonard Pozner was doing his cabalistic evil on Dr. Tracy.

uest Posts
Brittany Maynard, My Undead Niece
September 20, 2018 MHB Admin 12 Comments
(another Orange County zombie chick)
by Alison Maynard

Editor’s Note: This provocative article, originally published in 2015 on Maynard’s blog, therealcolorado.blogspot.com, examines a potential case of death fraud involving the author’s niece, Brittany Maynard. In 2014 Maynard was caught in an existential struggle with brain cancer and thus opted to move from California to Oregon, where physician-assisted suicide is legal. The research and analysis of her alleged demise are especially significant as they point to a pseudocide that, if valid, is directly related to achievement of a specific ideational (and likely deep state/Globalist) public relations objective: the cultural normalization and acceptance of what is effectively self murder under the auspices of professional medicine and “personal empowerment.”

At present euthanasia is legal in four countries and assisted suicide in four more. In the United States assisted suicide is legal in eight states, with California approving the practice in the wake of Maynard’s purported death. Of course, public acquiescence of such an act comprises a slippery “bioethical” slope. If ending one’s life in the event of terminal disease becomes acceptable practice, can one also opt to kill oneself to “save” the planet from “climate change,” or prevent the extinction of certain exotic species? Will we one day become overwhelmed by despair and be able to “”return to the home of the God” a la “Sol” Roth’s character in Soylent Green? In the end the question becomes, What is human life? The stakes are profound when considered beyond the narrow confines of “individual choice,” which, as demonstrated in the case of Brittany Maynard and subsequent “#IWanttheOption” activists, is clearly how certain interests seek to frame this issue.

In October 2014, a story flooded media outlets everywhere around the world about the tragedy of Brittany Maynard, a 29-year-old with an aggressive brain tumor known as Glioblastoma multiforme, who had decided to commit assisted suicide in Oregon under Oregon’s “Death with Dignity” law.

I learned about it from a post on I read on this very blog–and my jaw dropped. Brittany is my niece, but has been estranged from our family for several years. Her mother, Debbie Ziegler, and my brother divorced in around 1987, when Brittany was three.

I have investigated “Brittany’s suicide,” and have proof that it did not occur and Brittany is not dead. The event was a psy op perpetrated by the CIA-controlled media on the public, to expand availability of assisted suicide. This is the more clear now, seeing Debbie giving press conferences at the California legislature in favor of such a bill, along with Dan Diaz, Brittany’s putative husband. No truly grieving parent or husband would be able to do this.

Something else they wouldn’t do is fail to investigate whether a cure was available before agreeing to a beloved 29-year-old’s plan to kill herself. Turns out a cure is available. On March 27, 2015, 60 Minutes revealed that Duke Medical School researchers have been regularly shrinking Glioblastoma multiformetumors to nothing by injecting them with polio viruses, achieving complete cures. There are hundreds of published papers on the web about similar successes with oncolytic viruses. Oops: looks like Debbie, Brittany, and Dan overlooked that research, in their obsession with ending Brittany’s life.
Faux Photos.

Another clear sign this is a hoax has been the media’s use of photos of women who are NOT Brittany. Here is one of my photos of Brittany. Here’s another. (There are more childhood photos at the bottom.)

Compare these with this bogus photo on People Magazine’s Oct. 27, 2014, cover, of a model they declare is “Brittany Maynard photographed exclusively for People, Oct. 11, 2014.” This same model appears on pages 64, 65, and 69. Anyone can see Brittany has an elfin look which the impostor does not have, and a broader smile, with upturned corners.

Blogger Miles Mathis, who is a portrait painter, agrees the model on the People cover is not Brittany. Same with the photos of “Brittany with her family at the Grand Canyon,” and a very large “Brittany strolling with her husband on a forested path“: none of these are Brittany. While a few real pictures are interspersed, they do not include a full-face close-up as an adult. She is in profile, wearing dark glasses, or photographed from far away. Brittany thus could go anywhere to resume life under an alias, and no one would recognize her.

The video posted Oct. 6 (which shows a woman with a chubby face, which the People cover model does not have as of Oct. 11!) does have some similarity with Brittany, particularly in the voice. However, it is possible to use a model to create facial expressions in a video of someone else, in real time. I believe that is what has been done here.

I need to poke fun at the still shown in the video which has Debbie’s head inclined at a rakish angle towards yet another model, pooching her lips. It’s clear Debbie’s head was simply pasted on. They are both wearing “Love” T-shirts. When I saw that, I said, “How very Sandy Hook” (Sandy Hook being yet another psy op).

***Update Oct. 6, 2015: that bit has been removed from the video!
CIA connection.

One thing that bothered me when I was working this out was how the CIA/media hoax network would know Debbie and Brittany were available to participate in this fraud. I then remembered Debbie’s younger brother, David Q. Ziegler, and found he is in Army intelligence. This connection can fully explain it–along with financial difficulties we know Debbie was having (another thing she has in common with many of the Sandy Hook participants). Another is probably Adrian Diaz, discussed below. One blogger who is suspicious of Brittany’s demise has linked Compassion & Choices, the group which sponsored her suicide, to George Soros.

Absence of records at the funeral home.

There is a death certificate for Brittany. While this may seem like a show-stopper, it is fraudulent.

The most important evidence came from the funeral home, Crown Memorial Center (which runs the Cascade Cremation Center). I went to their website and put the last name “Maynard” into their “Search for Tributes” bar shortly after I received the death certificate, and nothing came up. Same with “Diaz.” So I called Crown to ask whether there was an online memory book for Brittany Maynard, or a service, and the young woman who answered was puzzled. She said, “I don’t have any information. She is not in the system.” I then asked her whether it was customary to cremate a body quickly after death, and she said yes. Note that the death certificate states the date of disposition of the body as “TBD”–“to be determined”–even though it was filled out by the funeral director 17 days after the death.

The employee told me to call back between 12:30 and 1:00 to speak to the director, Tiffany Hubbard. When I called at 12:32, my call was routed to a male at another location, who was verbally abusive. So–get that: I am a family member asking about my tragically deceased niece, and he’s nasty. I asked HIM whether cremation had taken place and he said it WOULD have been, and then corrected himself to say that it DID, “shortly after death.” But, as noted, the death certificate says “TBD” and was signed by Tiffany Hubbard on Nov. 18, when death reportedly occurred Nov. 1. So he was lying. When I asked him whether a service would be held, he babbled, then said, “The family has been very private about this.” I laughed out loud, saying this “family” has been the least private in the history of the world!

The man then said Brittany’s website fulfilled the memory book function (and, indeed, no one who did not have the death certificate would have any idea Crown was the funeral parlor which handled the body. Only I had that information.). I told him that the MAYNARDS were family–that my brother was both Brittany’s legal and biological father, and he had received no notification of her wedding, her cancer, her death, or her funeral (and there was no funeral, anyway). Note another false entry on the death certificate for the phone number of Dan Diaz. It says “not available.” They don’t get to say that. Oregon law requires the funeral home to obtain personal data about the decedent from the next of kin, and the form requires a phone number for that person, stated to be Dan Diaz.

Another problem is that the Social Security Death Index does not have Brittany’s name on it, even though the SSN is listed on the death certificate. ***Update, Nov. 4, 2017: regulations enacted in 2014 (what a coincidence!) restricted the public’s ability to review records in the SSDI for three years after the death. So today, I was finally able to verify that her name was not on it. It isn’t. I even input her actual Social Security number along with her year of birth. That means she has never been reported dead to SSA, and her Social Security number is still in use. Note that I’ve now changed the link to the death certificate, so that anyone can now see her SSN. Formerly, I had redacted it.***

Also, Brittany’s voter registration was cancelled, but that was the result of an email I sent to the Secretary of State Dec. 11, 2014, asking whether it was still active. By law the county health registrar, who receives the report of death, is supposed to give notice within five days to the county clerk to cancel the voter registration. Instead, that notice came from me, through the SOS. That is proof that no report was made to the county health registrar.

The most important thing, however, is the Crown employee’s statement, “She is not in the system.” This means: no online memory book, no funeral, no records of body transport or cremation as required by law, no report to the SSA, no notification to the county health registrar or county voting registrar, and no bills. All these omissions by the funeral director of actions she would routinely take indicate normal procedures were not followed. The reason has to be that there was no body.

Note that the location of death–the residence–on the death certificate (3108 Vista Verde Terrace, Portland, OR) is different from Brittany’s voter registration address (7518 SW Roanoke Dr. N., Wilsonville, OR).
Doctor who signed death certificate did not diagnose or treat her for cancer, and was not an oncologist.

The doctor, Eric Wyatt Walsh, signed the death certificate on Nov. 13, twelve days after death. He should’ve done it within 48 hours. He certified that the cause of death was “Glioblastoma multiforme.”

Walsh gave an address for himself which was not the address associated with his license. Only by asking for an investigation from the State Medical Board did I learn it was the address of Gentiva, a large hospice corporation. Dr. Walsh himself then called me, but, like the funeral parlor guy, would not give me any real information, due to “privacy restrictions,” even though dead people don’t have privacy rights. Their medical records are subject to disclosure, under Oregon law. I asked him when he started treating Brittany, whether he is the one who had prescribed the lethal drug, whether he had seen a body, and other important things. He would not answer any of my questions. He did admit he is not an oncologist–his area of practice is “palliative care.” He also said that, in Oregon, the doctor who signs the death certificate is not required to see a body! So that’s an admission that he didn’t. I had previously learned that, under Oregon’s Death with Dignity law, the death certificate is required to state the cause of death as “natural causes,” even though it was suicide.

Since Dr. Walsh is not an oncologist, how would he have known if Brittany’s condition was terminal, or whether she even had cancer? He wouldn’t, of course.

Which means it was illegal for him to prescribe the drug or sign the death certificate! Under Oregon law, the death certificate may be signed only by the doctor who was in charge of the care of the patient for the illness or condition that resulted in death. The “Death with Dignity Act” similarly defines “attending physician” as “the physician who has primary responsibility for the care of the patient and treatment of thepatient’s terminal disease.” The attending physician must also… “(a) Make the initial determination of whether a patient has a terminal disease,” and take other steps, including referring the patient to a consulting physician.” Clearly, someone who is not an oncologist could not qualify as an attending physician. As a matter of law he is not competent to diagnose cancer, determine the cause of death, or sign the death certificate. It would, moreover, not be legal for Brittany to receive her initial diagnosis in California, as she claimed, and then move to Oregon to die.

In short, Dr. Walsh did not treat Brittany for the illness she reportedly died from, since he did not have the expertise to examine her, read her Xrays, or decide whether her condition was terminal; and the initial diagnosis was not made by him.

So both the doctor and funeral director have made false certificates. Walsh’s conduct was patently illegal. I asked for investigations of both in Oregon. Predictably, they went nowhere.
Brittany’s phone still active.

Brittany’s cellphone is still active as of 2018, so someone is paying the bill. I left a message for her on or around Nov. 4, 2014. (She did not call back.) I have emailed her several times, most recently in June 2017, too, and the email does not bounce.
Bogus date chosen.

When I first watched Brittany’s video, she made an issue out of the date she’d chosen to kill herself, Nov. 1st, because it was the “day after my husband’s birthday,” which she said was October 30th. My notes from the video are here. However, the day after October 30th is October 31st, not November 1st. Worse, Dan Diaz’s birthday, according to ancestry.com, is October 26th. I mentioned all these things in an email to my friend Wendy, at the time. When I reviewed Brittany’s video again sometime later, all the statements about her husband’s birthday had been taken out of it.

So: that whole story was fake. Importantly, Brittany didn’t know her “husband’s” birthday.
MRI/Xrays probably fake.

There are discrepancies in the radiologic images from the University of California San Francisco shown in Brittany’s video. The employee I spoke to in the Radiology department said (1) Brittany had brought her first image to them from another location, which was not a hospital, as she could tell from encryption; (2) Brittany did have appointments at UCSF Radiology, but patients are not required to produce an ID; and (3) Brittany did not retrieve her records from UCSF when she went to get a second opinion. When the employee volunteered this last bit I could tell she found that strange. To recap: Brittany did not take her UCSF records to Oregon, although she said in her video that she had had to “find a new team,” since assisted suicide is not legal in California; and the doctor who prescribed the lethal drug to her in Oregon was not an oncologist. He was not able to make any assessment of whether she had cancer or was terminal, did not have the images, and was not required to see a body. Yet this man stated under oath that she died of Glioblastoma multiforme.

As for the tumor Xray or MRI image with Brittany’s name typed on it, when I was talking over this matter with my Aunt Pat (Brittany’s great-aunt), she said, “Oh, but of course X-rays can be faked.” That possibility had not even occurred to me. Aunt Pat knew this because she reads a lot of mysteries. I investigated and found outfits online which sell fake X-rays as gag gifts.

Brittany was also treated at the UCSF hospital under a name which was not then her legal name. Her marriage certificate, dated Sept. 29, 2012, shows she changed her name to “Brittany Lauren Diaz.” Adrian Diaz, the brother of Dan, who (strangely) officiated at their wedding, holds the position of “Associate Director, State Government Relations” at the University of California Berkeley Chancellor’s Office; has held other positions with UC Berkeley; and interned with the San Francisco Mayor’s Office of Communications. In his UC position he may very well have access to all kinds of records, maybe even UCSF patient records. Adrian Diaz now has been giving interviews as one of the witnesses who attended Brittany in her last moments, although she did not mention he would be by her side, in her video. My guess is that he is a controller of this operation.

New info as of 10-6-15: I have the Brittany X-rays. These are huge files on three CD’s. I cannot make much of them, but will provide copies to anyone on request. I do note that the first X-ray or MRI, taken Jan. 1, 2014, at 7:00 a.m., is of her chest, which does not jibe with the story of headaches and a seizure which brought Brittany to the emergency room on New Year’s Day. A brain X-ray was not taken until Jan. 2, 2014. In addition, the notes on one of the CD’s say, “CT performed at an outside institution on 12/31.” More X-rays were taken by UCSF in August 2014, when Brittany and her “family” (I put that in quotes because it makes me mad) supposedly had been in Oregonfor some time.
Reporter poseurs.

Along with the bogus photos People Magazine published, its interview with Debbie paints her as a struggling single mom who raised Brittany on her own, utterly false. The New York Times parroted that view, listing Brittany’s “survivors” as Debbie Ziegler and her stepfather Gary Holmes. Huh? Mr. Holmes has no legal or biological relationship to Brittany, while Brittany’s real father–who has both–is not mentioned. Nor were her little brother, aunts and uncle, cousins, and more on the Maynard side. We were not involved in this caper and didn’t know anything about it. My brother has observed that this depiction of Debbie as Struggling Single Parent will be followed up by book and movie deals. [AND HE WAS EXACTLY RIGHT: SEE HERE.]

People also says Debbie is 56, when she is 58, and that Brittany and company moved to Oregon in June, when she registered to vote in Oregon in April. Was there an advance team that took care of such things as the voter registration? It appears the left hand did not know what the right hand was doing.

I attempted to correct the Wikipedia entry on Brittany, only to the extent of (1) noting that People Magazinehad faked the photos; (2) Brittany had this whole crowd of Maynard family members out there that were not mentioned; and (3) Debbie and Brittany have a history as scammers, whose principal target in the past has been my brother. My entry was immediately whooshed off Brittany’s page and put onto my OWN “talk page” (which I didn’t even know I had), which was then censored, so none of it is available, even though I volunteered to remove the reference to scamming. I was told to email Wiki’s legal department about my dispute, which I did–and I never got a response. So Wikipedia, far from being the neutral, ethical, independent source of information it represents itself to be, is as much a shill for the governing elite as the rest of the mass media. Even when I am telling it what the situation is, as a source with direct, first-hand knowledge, it prefers fictions published by CNN, The New York Times, Washington Post, Fox News, etc.

Who are these people repackaging press releases as fact, with the imprimatur of respected publications? Thatnot a single person reporting this story either made their own investigation or questioned the party line means there is no “Fourth Estate.” There is only a central monolith churning out lies for public consumption. These “reporters” and theirvaunted publicationsbreach the public trust on an ongoing basis and should be skewered at every opportunity. This event is yet more proof that U.S. media are the real TASS. The Soviet Union is us.

[Make sure to read “Policy Objectives of the Staged Tragedy,” and learn about Compassion & Choices’ involvement in the highly lucrative organ-harvesting industry.]

Connected post: A Very Weird Coincidence. There will soon be a couple more connected posts on therealcolorado.blogspot.com—and maybe also here on Memory Hole blog! Stay tuned!

***

Update: here are a few more photos of Brittany, on a tribute my brother’s family sent out in Christmas 2014, and some more. Here’s a much earlier oneon a Christmas card sent by my brother’s family in 2001, where I frankly think she was photoshopped in, since her head is too big and she is overexposed. However, it is still a family photo: you will not find it online.) My brother believes Brittany must be dead because the media says so. He has refused to read about what I have discovered and even stopped talking to me, because I did not convey my condolences. In case Brittany reads this, he has told me he still loves her, despite the problems. And of course I love her, too.

Update 10-12-15: Have a look at this Facebook screenshot, in which Dan’s cousin Vicky Garcia sympathizes with Brittany and Dan over the courageous decision they have had to make. It is dated Oct. 12, 2012. Brittany’s diagnosis, according to her video, was Jan. 1, 2014.–P.S.: a commenter has told me I misinterpreted the Facebook date, and he or she may be right. I will be publishing a follow-up soon about Vicky and Dan’s mothers, who are sisters from Cuba with a startling history.

Update 4-17-17: Have located a few more childhood pictures of Brittany, which are here,here, and here, as well as a picture of the young Debbie Ziegler with my brother and my dad. (My dad’s nickname for Brittany as a toddler, by the way, was “Miss Sparkle Plenty”!)

* * * * * * * * *

Alison Maynard obtained her A.B. from Cornell University, College of Arts and Sciences, and her J.D. from the University of Denver College of Law. She was admitted to the Colorado Bar in 1987.


error
0

Great 411 on Alison! I knew I liked her... U 2 may want to give her a stroke @ Mami's where I notice she's dropped a TY message
4 comments:

Dachsie your last message is double posted; may want to delete one of them?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatColo

Great 411 on Alison! I knew I liked her... U 2 may want to give her a stroke @ Mami's where I notice she's dropped a TY message
4 comments:

Dachsie your last message is double posted; may want to delete one of them?

---

I have never deleted a post. Please tell me how.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

I have never deleted a post. Please tell me how.

---

"Edit Post" @ bottom-right of post >> Go advanced >> at top u will find Delete Post stuff, incl an optional field to give an explanation

Rebecca Carnes recent advent on the Sandy Hook truthseekers scene via Dr. Fetzer's blog and Raw Deal show and other places, has reawakened my hope in a big breaktrhough for exposing the Sandy Hook 12-14-12 event as this disgusting evil psyop it was on the American public.

I do not like just discussing and remembering with no hope in mind and now I have renewed hope.

The way Sunny named off a "jillion" suspicious non-answers to Wolfgang Halbig many many FOIAs and inquiries, and did so in a brief but professional way covering years of Halbig's efforts in combination with a new perspective of a three-generation Newtown Connecticut resident definitely revives interest and hope now.

All these years of false flag events on U S soil has brought to a head the degree of awareness of our very corrupt government and media.

Veritas always wins.

Mind Control Used for Carrying Out Psychopathic Agendas

February 22, 2020 Russ Winter Articles by Russ Winter, US News, Winter Watch Articles 17
https://i1.wp.com/www.winterwatch.ne...00%2C350&ssl=1

How does one spot the difference between a fraud and a real event? Yes, in the real world — as opposed to the Hollywood cartoon world that America is fed — I do believe there might be real — “not insane” — radicals who use violence. But under such an assumption, my hypothesis is that they would go after high-value targets, not little old church ladies.

However, is it possible that Americans have become so culturally sick and satanic that people are acting out in insane ways, such as randomly killing people? There could also be copycat triggers. A few years ago there was a rash of stabbings involving “carrying out orders” from a pseudo-paranormal character called “Slenderman” [see “Who is Slenderman?“]. This is more cult-of-death, evil, B.S. pushed onto popular culture by the psychopaths running the show.

more https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/02/...state-agendas/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dachsie

Rebecca Carnes recent advent on the Sandy Hook truthseekers scene via Dr. Fetzer's blog and Raw Deal show and other places, has reawakened my hope in a big breaktrhough for exposing the Sandy Hook 12-14-12 event as this disgusting evil psyop it was on the American public.

---

The Raw Deal With Jim Fetzer 2020.03.06

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hebSdThsd...600/fetzer.jpg

Today: Guest, Rebecca Carnes

Volume Variations Adjusted

JamesFetzer.org

64k CF Download

I am extremely disappointed that Rebecca Carnes is not exposing new and stronger proofs, our truth weaponry, that Sandy Hook was a hoax.

I thought she could follow up on some fishing parts of the official story and get more solid information supporting its fishyness because she know who was around and is still around who were the leaders in the Newtown community.

I thought she could at least throw out the NAMES of the people who led the big theatrical play and subsequent cover-up. That would be could use of knowledge.

She seems like a courageous honest person, but she is not pursuing just the very things that offered real hope for our better exposing the truth. She must live there with her family and she has to be careful what she does and say because she is already being treated badly by locals just for her innocuous petition calling for a new investigation on why the police response to the event were so poor.

Dr. Fetzer says his goal now is...

James Fetzer says:
February 11, 2020 at 5:13 pm
The hardest part about discussing Sandy Hook is to open minds just enough to even talk about it. She is doing that. I am not concerned about how much she is able to achieve in relation to a serious investigation, because we know it will never happen. But I am ecstatic that she is getting local folks and Connecticut residents to leave their minds slightly ajar to consider it.

https://jamesfetzer.org/2020/02/rebe...re-truly-safe/

In other words for Dr. Fetzer he is ecstatic just to get the residents of Newtown "to leave their minds slightly ajar to consider it." that is to say the new goal is just have the people of Newtown able to discuss the Sandy Hook openly and freely.

That has never been my goal.

My goal is getting stronger and stronger truth and using truth as a weapon to achieve justice, forcing the truth out there as strongly as we can so that people are not frozen in fear.

The town of Newtown Connecticut is what is called a Potemkin Village. It ia fake rosy nicey nicey nice looking upscale community but the fact is that for many years there have been very weird sophisticated takeover of the whole place.

Quote:

---

Gabby Petito was in 2013 ‘Irreplaceable’ music video for Sandy Hook

---

https://nypost.com/2021/09/27/gabby-...irreplaceable/