https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXfKwNcUMAAaQWa.jpg
Printable View
https://twitter.com/antischool_ftw/s...16550070145026
‘And award for biggest pedophile goes to…’: Shock Billboards Go Up Around Oscars
‘Name names on stage or shut the hell up!’ another billboard reads
https://fellowshipofminds.files.word...pg?w=499&h=281
https://hw.infowars.com/wp-content/u...-billboard.jpg
https://hw.infowars.com/wp-content/u...illboard12.jpg
mueller and one of the largest kid porn purveyors in history
https://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@li.../msg69094.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheka.
Have not heard from Kris Milligan in many years. His website is Trineday.com
He used to have and may still have a very well known site that sold books on the various kinds of secret societies and conspiracies.
I never have liked the way he has that spinning logo of the 666 symbol but I guess he feels that is consistent with the kinds of materials he sells, not necessarily his agreement with the materials he sells.
This is Isaac Asimov's son who is still around somewhere probably still involved in the same kind of activities.
Mueller has helped cover up, in various ways, several of the crimes of the Clintons and is now impeding the many investigations going forward on several important issues. These investigations, though seeming to be very very slow, are what is pushing the deep state into a corner where they will do anything to not be exposed and legally dealt with, and that includes inciting a worldwide nuclear war. Evil people are megalomaniacal.
I have heard that he is about to resign but that would be too nice for him.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kris Millegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:52 PM
Subject: [CTRL] HOW DAVID ASIMOV, THE BIGGEST CHILD PORN PROCESSOR IN
CALIFORNIA SKATED AWAY FROM FEDERAL PRISON WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM HIS
FRIENDS
>-Caveat Lector-
>
>Click Here: <A
HREF="http://www.newsmakingnews.com/asimov3,29,01.htm";>http</A>
>-----
>HOW DAVID ASIMOV, THE BIGGEST CHILD PORN PROCESSOR IN CALIFORNIA SKATED
AWAY
>FROM FEDERAL PRISON WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM HIS FRIENDS by Kathryn Dixon �
>2000
>David Asimov, of Living Oak Court, Bennett Ridge, Santa Rosa, the son of
the
>late science fiction writer Isaac Asimov, was sentenced on March 28, 2001
to
>six months' home detention with electronic monitoring and three years
federal
>probation for possessing child pornography. U.S. District Court Judge
Maxine
>M. Chesney sentenced Asimov after reviewing a series of sealed psychiatric
>reports, one of which was ordered by the court. Asimov who was charged
with
>four federal counts of possession of child pornography with each count
>carrying a five year sentence, pled guilty to two counts in a plea bargain
>deal. There was no forfeiture of any of Asimov's assets in this case,
>despite his owning a home in Santa Rosa purchased in 1996 for $375,000, and
>despite his receiving $3,000 per month from his father's estate.
>How did Asimov, who possessed one of the largest stashes of pornography in
>California, skate away from federal prison? A look at the players yields
the
>answer.
>Asimov's child porn stash was so big many child victims and perpetrators
>would have taken a fall, had Asimov been zealously prosecuted at trial.
>Asimov would probably have escaped detection, if he had not taken his
>personal computer to a store when its scanner and color printer
>malfunctioned. A technician working on the machine discovered images of
>children engaged in sexual acts with adults. A store supervisor contacted
>the police. Asimov's case is not the only case where tips about child porn
>were generated by store technicians. It seems either child pornographers
are
>stupid about fixing their computers or they are unwitting framed.
>The police raided Asimov's four-bedroom home with a search warrant and
>discovered the largest child porn "processing center" ever discovered in
>California.
>"There were thousands of disks, thousands of videos," said Sonoma County
>Deputy District Attorney Gary Medvigy, who personally referred to Asimov's
>home as a "processing center" for child pornography. "Anything imaginable
>regarding sex between human beings and human beings, or human beings and
>animals, was there. Whatever your imagination can conjure up, he had it. It
>was like walking into a TV studio" Santa Rosa police seized scores of
>computer disks and approximately 4,000 videocassettes from Asimov's home,
and
>approximately 1,000 of those videos contained child pornography.
>Medvigy said he had evidence to show Asimov distributed child pornography
>through the Internet ``on at least a few occasions,'' which would
constitute
>a felony. He said Asimov had 14 video machines arranged for high-speed
>editing and copying, and possessed cases of blank tapes.
>In addition to the videotapes and computer disks recovered, police
reportedly
>found video cameras, several VCRs, and a costly table-top scanner to create
>computer images. "He had a whole lot of editing and mass production
>capabilities," Santa Rosa Police officer Zamudio said. "We were greeted by
>thousands of tapes, disks, periodicals, and commercial videos with covers
>showing child pornography. We spent two days collecting, packaging, and
>transporting all the items."
>The Sonoma County District Attorney J. Michael Mullins covered up the case,
>let the public believe the feds would prosecute it more thoroughly, and
then
>passed the cover up to U.S. Attorney Mueller.
>In March 1998, Asimov was arrested in Sonoma County and charged with two
>counts of felony exploitation of a child and possession of pornography.
>Asimov faced a maximum state penalty of six years. The identity of the
child
>whom Asimov alleged exploited was never revealed to the public. Parents
and
>associates of the child never came forward. Was there a secret settlement
in
>the style of Michael Jackson? Was any effort at all made to identify the
>children in the tapes? In Europe, parents who are looking for their
missing
>children or for evidence of child abuse are allowed to view pictures of
faces
>of children depicted in porno tapes which are seized by the police. No one
>in Sonoma County reported any photo arrays seized from Asimov's home being
>shown by the police to any parents whose children were exploited or
>kidnapped.
>Asimov was arraigned in Sonoma County Municipal Court, with bail set at
>$250,000. Asimov spent a few days in jail. His lawyer Andrian said Asimov
>had the money to post bail, but preferred to attempt to get out on his own
>recognizance. In fact, a few days later, Judge Frank Passalacqua released
>Asimov after having been told no local victims were identified in the porn
>seized from Asimov's home. Thus, within only a few days of his arrest,
>Asimov was released, because the police happened to know no local victims
>were involved. How could they have known so fast? Obviously, the Sonoma
>County Court didn't care that victims who were not "local" may have been
>involved. Someone's child was on those tapes.
>"As far as local victims, we don't know of any. There are some homemade
>tapes,'' Sonoma County Deputy District Attorney Gary Medvigy told the
judge.
>Why was a distinction made by the Sonoma County Judge and District Attorney
>regarding determining if Asimov's tapes involved "local" victims as opposed
>to non-local victims? What did District Attorney Mullins consider to be
>"local"? Within Sonoma County? Within California? Medvigy also
>acknowledged to Judge Passalacqua that the investigation was still in its
>infancy because of the massive amount of material taken from Asimov's
house.
>Despite the investigation being in its "infancy", Judge Passalacqua set
>Asimov loose.
>By releasing Asimov on his own recognizance, the Sonoma County Judge and
>prosecutor made it clear that they considered the case to be light weight.
>There was no pressure on Asimov to turn in any of his confederates or to
>spill the beans, when he was just lounging around his luxurious home,
>unemployed and enjoying Santa Rosa life. Asimov was ordered released on
the
>condition he stay away from children, computers and the Internet. The
public
>was expected to feel safe because Passalacqua sternly told Asimov he would
>have to comply with a list of conditions, including observing a curfew and
>allowing a probation officer to search his house at any time, and would
have
>to take random chemical tests and engage in psychological counseling.
>In July 1998, before a preliminary hearing commenced which would have put
the
>massive amount of evidence before the public, suddenly Sonoma County Deputy
>District Attorney Gary Medvigy announced that U.S. Attorney's Office in
San
>Francisco agreed to prosecute Asimov, 46, thus relieving Sonoma County of
the
>prosecution. Sonoma Superior Court Judge Frank Passalacqua
"conditionally''
>dismissed the two felony charges against Asimov related to distributing
child
>pornography. Passalacqua stated the charges were dismissed only so federal
>authorities could file their case and would be reinstated in 30 days if for
>some reason federal authorities did not proceed.
>Medvigy tried to convince the public that the reason for the dismissal was
>that his office was limited in its ability to investigate the sources and
>possible distribution of the ``enormous'' amount of child pornography found
>in Asimov's home. Medvigy also cited the fact that much of Asimov's porn
came
>from the internet and involved out-of-state and international sources,
which
>made it more appropriate for federal authorities to take over. At this
>point, J. Michael Mullins apparently wanted the public to believe that the
>federal government was going to do a much more extensive prosecution of
>Asimov than Sonoma County authorities were able to do.
>However, Asimov's attorney shed light on the true reason for the dismissal.
>Chris Andrian said he believed Sonoma County prosecutors handed the case to
>the feds because they had weak evidence of any felony being committed.
>Skating away from prison was on Asimov's mind.
>Deputy District Attorney Medvigy stated about the dismissal, "We had hoped
to
>show that it was not just for his personal viewing pleasure.''
>U.S. Attorney Mueller delivered a sweet plea bargain to Asimov.
>After having found thousands of images of child pornography in Asimov's
>"processing center", District Attorney J. Michael Mullins, washed his hands
>of the matter very carefully. Mullins' office and the Santa Rosa police
made
>public statements that they spent "weeks" analyzing the pornography to
>determine whether Asimov was involved in production or merely possessed it
>for personal gratification. "I couldn't tell you if it was for personal
use,
>national use, or international use," Medvigy said. "It's just too early to
>say."
>Asimov was indicted by a federal grand jury in November 1999 on four counts
>of possessing images of child pornography. Because the grand jury
transcript
>has not been released to the public, the public cannot determine whether
>evidence of distribution and sale of pornography was ever presented by the
>U.S. Attorney.
>Did the grand jury see all 1000 videotapes of horrendous child pornography
>found in Asimov's home? If so, why did they only find four instances where
>pornography was possessed by Asimov? Did the grand jury see any evidence
>that Asimov transmitted or received the pornography via the internet on his
>computer, or manufactured it with his cameras, 14 video machines and high
>tech scanner? Who were the little children depicted on the tapes? Was the
>grand jury given any explanation by U.S. Attorney Mueller?
>In December 1999, Asimov pled not guilty in federal court, and was released
>on his own recognizance. Again this type of release put no pressure on
>Asimov. Asimov enjoyed more balmy days at his Santa Rosa home.
>The two previous charges in Sonoma County, included distribution of child
>pornography and felony exploitation of a child. The federal indictment did
>not include these charges, and only included lesser charges that Asimov
>possessed child pornography by downloading images from the Internet into
his
>computer and onto a floppy disk. The federal charges also included the
>possession of one videocassette and one foreign magazine with images of
>children engaged in sex acts. Each of the four federal counts carried a
>potential sentence of five years in prison.
>In the summer of 1999, U.S. Attorney Mueller engaged in plea deal with
>Asimov, by dropping two counts. At this point, Asimov and his attorney
were
>close to obtaining a sentence which would not involve state prison or
>forfeiture of assets.
>Mueller dropped the ball on the Asimov case. Because of the sealed grand
>jury testimony and sealed evidence, the public will never know the details
>about the one thousand of images of child pornography Asimov used and
created
>and stored. The public is expected to believe that Asimov never
distributed
>any of this pornography. From whom did he obtain this pornography. No
>public evidentiary hearings were ever held. Mueller did a good job
>protecting child pornographers in California.
>Judge Maxine Chesney let Asimov skate federal prison by using psychiatric
>evidence as a basis for the sentence.
>Ultimately, U.S. District Judge Maxine Mackler Chesney gave Asimov an
>incredibly light sentence. No prison. The plea bargain limited her
sentencing
>options, yet she still could have sent Asimov to prison for several years.
>Instead, she took the road laid out for her by various psychiatrists.
>Asimov's attorney Andrian hired psychiatrists to examine his client. Then
>Judge Chesney, herself, appointed a psychiatrist to examine Asimov.
>Apparently, the psychiatric reports about Asimov and all his problems were
>somewhat convincing, or at least established a basis in the record for such
a
>light sentence. The public will never know. These reports are sealed.
>Judge Chesney was nominated by Senator Diane Feinstein and is the wife of
>former San Francisco Superior Court Judge Edward Stern. Judge Chesney
served
>on the San Francisco Superior Court Bench prior to her appointment.
>It is clear that Judge Chesney by this sentencing decision has signaled
that
>public that even the biggest pornography processor in California can walk
>free on the streets.
>ASIMOV'S LAWYER CHRIS ANDRIAN PLAYED HIS CARDS WELL FOR HIS CLIENT, AS
DIRTY
>AS THOSE CARDS WERE.
>Early in the case, Asimov's lawyer Chris Andrian, who has represented many
>child molesters in Northern California, promoted the theory that his
client
>was a reclusive man. After his sentencing, Andrian said Asimov's arrest
made
>him "look inside himself and try to figure out how he got there," even
before
>Judge Chesney ordered counseling.
>The following are various statements made by Andrian throughout the Asimov
>case. One can only conclude that Andrian utilized effect mind-control
>techniques on the public and on the District Attorney, U.S. Attorney and
the
>courts by making statements to make his client look less than totally evil
>and by making it as easy as possible for the authorities to let his client
>skate away from serving a federal prison term.
>Andrian said:
>
>* "My take on the guy is that he's a reclusive introvert. If he did any
of
>this it was in the confines of his own home ... It may have been a fantasy
>world.'' (At the time of Asimov's arrest.)
>
>* "There's no evidence he sold or distributed to any third person."
(When
>Judge Passalacqua dismissed the Sonoma County case against Asimov.)
>
>* Andrian said he believes only a fraction of the material seized by
police
>contains child pornography and many of the videos are for classic TV fare
>such as ``I Love Lucy'' and `Leave it to Beaver.'' Andrian said he already
>has hired a local psychologist to evaluate Asimov. He said so far, he has
not
>seen any evidence that his client was involved in distributing or intending
>to distribute child pornography, even though that is one of the two
felonies
>charged against him. (Source: Santa Rosa Press Democrat - when Asimov was
>released on his own recognizance in Santa Rosa.)
>
>* Andrian described David Asimov as a reclusive, introverted man, who has
>never been married and has no children. Asimov is not wealthy, he said, and
>gets a $3,000 monthly stipend from his father's estate. (Source: Santa Rosa
>Press Democrat - when Asimov was arraigned in federal court.)
>
>* Andrian said he has seen limited police reports, but ``he (Asimov)
>doesn't strike me as in the business of proliferating stuff to others.''|
>
>* Andrian said Asimov gets ``a stipend,'' but said he did not know the
>amount.
>
>* "I don't know of any evidence that he's selling it (child pornography)
>anywhere. I don't know that he needs to.''
>
>* "I don't think they ever uncovered any evidence of intent to duplicate
or
>disseminate (child pornography) to any third person. If they had, it would
>have been charged in federal court.''
>
>* "In the worst-case scenario, if they prove their case, the guy is a
>consumer, not a producer.''
>
>* Andrian disputes that the amount of child porn was that high, saying
>Asimov was a collector of all types of videos, including classic TV fare
such
>as ``Ozzie and Harriet'' and ``My Three Sons.'' (Source: Santa Rosa Press
>Democrat.)
>
>* "I want to believe (Asimov) can put this behind him, that he learned
his
>lesson and knows it's not appropriate.''
>
>U.S. Attorney Mueller, District Attorney J. Michael Mullins, the Santa Rosa
>Police, the FBI and U.S. District Court Judge Maxine Chesney all taught Mr.
>Asimov his lesson. They also taught a lesson to the children depicted in
>Asimov's 1000 video tapes, who suffered during the making of these brutal
>sexual exploitation tapes. These children, unlike Asimov, will not be able
>to put this matter behind them. Their fate, if they are still alive, makes
>Asimov's six-month sentence of six months of sitting at his home with an
>electronic monitoring bracelet on his ankle, look like a day at the beach.
>-----
>Aloha, He'Ping,
>Om, Shalom, Salaam.
>Em Hotep, Peace Be,
>All My Relations.
>Omnia Bona Bonis,
>Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
>Amen.
>Roads End
>
><A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
>DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
>==========
>CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
>screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
>sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
>directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
>major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
>That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
>always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
>credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
>
>Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
>================================================= =======================
>Archives Available at:
>http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
> <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
>http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
>================================================= =======================
>To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
>SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
>SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Om
>
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
================================================== ======================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
================================================== ======================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
2 from HoneyBee, related article re the first, https://steemit.com/pedogate/@thehon...r-dirty-money#
- https://i.ytimg.com/vi/R28Dpfgdmwc/h...-JTaqogBMjILcQ 12:32
- Child Sexual Exploitation and Money Laundering in Seychelles: A Haven For Dirty Money
- 1,262 views
- 5 hours ago
- https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vl62XiT_SjI/h...NIhjTm0jOhh23g 3:41
"#PIZZAGATE" BEER AT ROBERTAS PIZZA
- 4,011 views
- 2 days ago
Read the Steemit Honeybee article about the Seychelles. Very interesting.
"A Call For An Uprising"
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q4qsm1FfrDM/h...sXFB5DPM0xSaog 11:07
THERES NOTHING ABNORMAL ABOUT THIS?
- 5,362 views
- 2 hours ago
And several months ago, pope's best pal claimed that he was innocent
=================
Cardinal George Pell, 76, escorted to court by dozens of police as hearing begins to decide if he will stand trial over sexual abuse allegations
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...legations.html
check out this one
http://www.texaspolicenews.com/defau...menugroup=Home
Man freed from 300-year term for child sex assault
Grand Junction, Colo.
GRAND JUNCTION, Colorado -- A Colorado man who was sentenced to more than 300 years in prison for sexually assaulting six children was released after an appeals court determined that his right to a speedy trial had been violated.
The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel reports 46-year-old Michael McFadden was released from prison Tuesday after the Colorado Supreme Court declined to hear the case.
McFadden was convicted in 2015, but his trial was delayed after his attorneys sought to include provisions in the juror questionnaire and the judge granted a continuance. Colorado's appellate court ruled that the delay couldn't be attributed to McFadden, who won't have to register as a sex offender because his convictions were vacated.
District Attorney Dan Rubinstein says he's appalled by the decision, but "we are without remedy."
FACEBOOK is PEDOPHILIA PIMPING
Facebook is sending messages to their subscribers if they would be OK for pedophiles to ask kids for sexual pictures. March 6 2018
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q3oiqWUjiuSf/
First published at 18:30 UTC on March 6th, 2018.
Rebroadcast from STRANGER THAN FICTION NEWS 3-6-2018
www.STFNEWS.com
http://stfnreport.com/
https://www.facebook.com/stfnews/
Magnet links can be accessed via Web Torrent --- https://webtorrent.io/
Category News & Politics
Sensitivity Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 13+
___________________
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/...res/395535002/
Facebook asked users if pedophiles should be able to ask kids for 'sexual pictures'
Jessica Guynn, USA TODAY Published 12:35 p.m. ET March 5, 2018 | Updated 6:59 p.m. ET March 5, 2018
embedded video in article
SAN FRANCISCO — Facebook is under fire for asking users whether pedophiles should be able to proposition underage girls for sexually explicit photographs on the giant social network.
The survey is the latest in a series of missteps by the Silicon Valley company, which has been criticized for allowing content that exploits children.
From violence on its Live streaming service to hate speech to divisive messages sent by Russian operatives trying to to meddle in the U.S. presidential election, toxic content flowing through its platform has heightened scrutiny of Facebook.
Facebook scrapped the survey that posed questions about teens being groomed by older men after it was spotted by media outlets in the United Kingdom. It now says the survey could have been better "designed."
The company routinely uses surveys to get feedback from the social network's more than 2 billion users. More recently, Facebook has been relying on user surveys to take their pulse on everything from the "fake news" epidemic to whether Facebook makes them happy as people have stopped spending as much time there.
But the two questions in Sunday's survey shocked and angered Facebook users.
"In thinking about an ideal world where you could set Facebook’s policies, how would you handle the following: a private message in which an adult man asks a 14-year-old girl for sexual pictures," Facebook asked.
Sexual contact with minors online, part of a "grooming process" in which adults seek to gain trust and lower inhibition, is often a precursor to sexual abuse.
The possible responses Facebook offered to the question ranged from "this content should not be allowed on Facebook, and no one should be able to see it" to "this content should be allowed on Facebook, and I would not mind seeing it."
Another question asked who should decide whether an adult man can ask for sexual pictures on Facebook, with options ranging from "Facebook users decide the rules by voting and tell Facebook" to "Facebook decides the rules on its own."
Jonathan Haynes, digital editor at the Guardian newspaper, tweeted: “I’m like, er wait is making it secret the best Facebook can offer here? Not, y’know, calling the police?"
"That was a mistake," Guy Rosen, a vice president of product at Facebook, responded.
"We run surveys to understand how the community thinks about how we set policies,” he wrote on Twitter. “But this kind of activity is and will always be completely unacceptable on (Facebook). We regularly work with authorities if identified. It shouldn't have been part of this survey."
"It is hard to believe that Facebook could be so utterly tone-deaf when it comes to this issue," said Diana Graber, founder of Cyber Civics and CyberWise which teach digital literacy to kids and parents. "The fact that Facebook would even pose this question theoretically is disgusting."
In a statement, Facebook said the survey referred to "offensive content that is already prohibited on Facebook and that we have no intention of allowing."
Stacey Steinberg, a law professor at the University of Florida and author of Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media, says the Facebook survey sent a "terrible message" and, worse yet, normalizes predatory behavior.
Facebook shouldn't be asking users whether such behavior is acceptable, it should be educating families on the risks posed by online predators, she said.
"Working with law enforcement is an important first step, but Facebook can do even more. Instead of asking questions such as the ones posed in this survey, Facebook can use its reach to help families and victims," Steinberg said.
Digital citizenship expert and technology ethicist David Ryan Polgar chalks up the flap over the survey to "massive growing pains" as Facebook wrestles with its social responsibility.
"The misstep with the survey seems to be a situation of good intentions that did not fully appreciate the rightful anger and frustration the general public feels towards the current online environment," he said.
International attention to how pedophiles use social media to target and prey on children has grown in recent years.
An investigation by the BBC in 2016 uncovered numerous private Facebook groups by and for men with a sexual interest in children to share images, with one run by a convicted pedophile. Photos of children taken from their parents' Facebook accounts have also been found on pedophile sites.
Facebook faced criticism again in 2017 when the BBC flagged dozens of images and pages containing child pornography. Of the 100 reported images,18 were removed by Facebook, according to the BBC. At the time, the BBC said Facebook asked to be sent examples of the images and then reported the broadcaster to the child exploitation unit of Britain’s National Crime Agency.
Verified child sex abuse images are sent to the U.S. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and other organizations that work with law enforcement to find offenders. Facebook also combats the spread of child pornography with technology that detects and blocks content from being uploaded.
"We have prohibited child grooming on Facebook since our earliest days," the company said. "We have no intention of changing this, and we regularly work with the police to ensure that anyone found acting in such a way is brought to justice."
CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 72 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Share your feedback to help improve our site experience!
POPULAR STORIES
Washington state passes its own net neutrality rules
usatoday.com
2 hours ago
Google honors author Gabriel García Márquez
usatoday.com
4 hours ago
Trevor Baylis, inventor of wind-up radio, has died
usatoday.com
4 hours ago
Author of $3 Uber, Lyft profit paper promises revision
usatoday.com
4 hours ago
Amazon expands Whole Foods free delivery to these cities
usatoday.com
5 hours ago
Facebook is apologizing after asking some users whether pedophiles seeking “sexual pictures” of children should be allowed on its site. Nathan Rousseau Smith reports. Buzz60
_________
Dachsie says...
Just introducing this subject under the guise of helping law enforcement is how Satan the snake operates.
They are getting the UNSPEAKABLE part of everyday conversations as if it is something that you can
dialog to consensus about.
FACEBOOK is freakin' evil.
FACEBOOK is PROMOTING pedophilia.
FACEBOOK already has several accounts where people come on showing their children who are for parties.
Can't we just start shooting the evil, sick fucks behind this outrageous perversion?
the problem is that pedophilia and underage sex have always existed, in all cultures... in the middle ages these deranged practices went underground in the western world... what we see is merely the result of century old taboos exploding in our facesQuote:
Originally Posted by old steel
this is a situation that could really take ALL cultures down
No, what we see is the price of tolerance and laziness. Pedos and Satanists will always be a problem, yes. If they're not tolerated it remains underground and limited in scope. Because degeneracy has been allowed to become accepted, little by little, to the point now that they've become much more bold and pervasive, is why we're struggling with them now. The known degenerated need to be rounded up and hung in prime time to demonstrate to the rest of them that they had better tone it the fuck down!Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
"what we see is merely the result of century old taboos exploding in our faces"
No, wrongdoing is not simply "taboo" and it is man's nature after the Fall.
Reminds me how one time in a psychology class the professor asked us what we was so wrong with the "taboo" of incest.
I said " because you get a concentration of recessive genes"
and the whole class almost started clapping for me.
The professor poo poo'd my statement and said "It is still just a taboo."
sorry... I beg to differ... in ancient greece and rome, pedophilia and underage sex was rampant
most cultures have regarded "being raped" as a taboo/shame. And it is now catching up with societies
I dont think all pedos are satanists, but all satanists are pedos.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua01
Sutherland Springs fake church shooting video.
https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=366YB268XXG8
The pastor, the Pomeroys, is into paganism, witchcraft and pedophilia.
Says all the locals got rich from their family members being killed.
Calling Evil Evil is not hate speech.
Sutherland Springs Hates Jesus
Awake Time With Jerry 1 view
0
0
Info
Shared / Embed
Add to
Report
Sutherland Springs Hates Jesus
Category: Uncategorized
Duration: 13:17
Date: 30 minutes ago
Tags:
Sutherland, Springs, Hates, Jesus
Spread this pdf far and wide, the names are here.
We need to put an end to this, these evil monsters in human form even prey on their own children. WTF?
Rage doesn't begin to describe where my mind is right now.
How in God's holy name does this happen in the land of the free and the home of the brave?
https://idraintheswamp.com/wp-conten...ETWORK.pdf.pdf
Suggest posting full text of that document on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by old steel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
Sutherland Springs
https://153news.net/plugins/cb_serve...675&w=900&zc=1
Sandy Hook
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...cDascpUQH7jweA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
I would but this file is massive with many links to documents and photo's of the evil perps, it would have to be broken up in so many pieces to post.
If you have the capability to do so you have my blessing, Dachsie.
This whole thing is starting to get interesting
Human Trafficking in Children.
Could there be anything Satanic lower rated happening on the planet?
Back to the Search
(AP) HAITI PM: US BAPTISTS KNEW REMOVING KIDS WAS WRONG
From: Cheryl Mills To: Hillary Clinton Date: 2010-02-01 03:00 Subject: (AP) HAITI PM: US BAPTISTS KNEW REMOVING KIDS WAS WRONG
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05766648 Date: 08/31/2015 RELEASE IN FULL From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> Monday, February 1, 2010 6:21 PM Sent: To: FW: (AP) Haiti PM: U.S.
Baptists knew removing kids was wrong Subject: fyi From: Deyo, Justin A Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:44 PM To: NEWS-Mahogany Cc: Thompson, Hillary C Subject: (AP) Haiti PM:
U.S. Baptists knew removing kids was wrong PORT-AU-PRINCE (AP) -
Haiti's prime minister says it's clear to him that the 10 U.S. Baptists who tried to take 33 Haitian children out of the quake-ravaged country "knew what they were doing was wrong." Prime Minister Max Bellerive also tells The Associated Press his country is open to having the Americans tried in the United States.
Bellerive says some of the children have parents who are alive. The government is attempting to locate them. He says a judicial system needs to determine whether the Americans were acting in good faith, as they claim, or are child traffickers. The Americans are mostly from Idaho.
They have been held since being arrested January 29 trying to enter the Dominican Republic with the children. Justin Deyo
https://www.wikileaks.org/clinton-em...2#searchresult
yes scientifically I agree but for centuries, girls molested or abused by an adult male (family) member, wouldnt say a thing because they were afraid of the shame it would cause and were blackmailed. So in a way that very social psychology toward child abuse has been brewing underneath the surface. it is a crime that has benefited from social stigma and taboos... and I believe that the concept of "virginity" has made kids desirable, since paganism.
On a metaphysical level, virginity, has also another and much more important meaning than "purity" , that God fathered the Universe/Matter mentally. That is precisely why virginity is a part of all religious beliefs. Satanists defy God at that level already, hence going after kids and the purity of their emotions.
In india for example, as soon as it was known they have lost their virginity, girls were repudiated or even sold as maids/slaves... in most poor countries, even today, the value of a kid is peanuts. And moral relativism is a major culprit.
This state of affair has many ramifications... is like war, everybody agrees it is legalized crime but watches other countries being bombed on TV. War could be abolished overnight if the majority would understand that wars kill children and that any society that does not respect its kids is doomed. Same about pedophilia of course. Case point. War too is satanic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
Catherine Austin Fitts on Pedophilia in the Senate
5 minute Bitchute video with Greg Hunter
She makes the point that Congress members that have pedophilia on their secret record live in extreme fear and it prevents them from thinking clearly.
She said they each have a "control file" on them and this causes them to act irrationally.
She mentions ,,,
John McCain
Marco Rubio
Lindsey Graham
as acting erradically but says she does not know what it is exactly that is in their background but they do appear to be acting from a huge fear of what can happen to them if they are uncovered.
They know they lose everything. Their career, any way of making livlihood, family will not speak to them, live in isolation and disgrace the rest of their lives, possibly must serve prison term. (What ever became of Denis Hastert, Mark Foley etc...) This gives a picture of what is being held over their heads.
Said Trump really does not want a big pedophilia scandal in the congress because then none of Trump's programs will get done. Nothing will get done, and you never know where that kind of wide open scandal is going to go. Trump has about a year and a half to prove he is getting America back on the right economy track.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/yRbMC5uvUshx/
Pedophilia in the Senate - Catherine Austin Fitts
Get-to-the-Point I think is the BitChute channel name
_________________
Catherine Fitts is giving realistic insights but it is very disheartening because it sends the message, to me anyway, that the bribery / extortion / blackmail grid that appears to hold our congress in suspension so that no one ever appears to act courageously on principle for what is truly for the common good of the people must be maintained. If the only chance of President Trump getting his programs carried out is to not drain the pedophilia and human trafficking swamp in congress, I say that "art of the deal" will not make America great again.
from a few years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=R...&v=eRrSnHTZVDQ
SGT re Trump's reaffirmation Wed in San Diego on (((human trafficking, plus cannibalism normalization push))).
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rFKWWdGy_94/h...07_j9o5DHZek2Q 8:44
TRUMP DROPS BOMB ON TRAFFICKERS
- 28,715 views
- 9 hours ago
Richie From Boston,
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8oxPJDemUwA/h...Ayb3yZZcJYs4-w 5:14
Dawkins pushing Cannibalism
- 29,403 views
- 23 hours ago
I just went to SGTreport.com and sent an online message asking if a video or at least an audio of this report about trafficking can be accessed on any platform other than YouTube, and if so please let me know where.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Doubt if I will hear back because his website does not want to receive messages from people who are not wanting to advertise with his site or YT channel or do not have some sort of business inquiry.
When I submitted the message I got this
403 Forbidden
IOj04I96/Ii2umvOs @ Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:00:45 GMT
BRICK-6
I think reporters who are clinging to YouTube only and not at least simultaneously setting up their work to be presented on other platforms will have to and indeed probably already are quickly altering their words and commentary and video content to the YouTube anti-free speech standards of the day.
Whenever I see "bombshell" or "drops bomb" wording, I wonder if that it is about truly important, game changing information or if that is more click bait where we cannot see any big thing really impacting and hitting on the human trafficking global cabal. We hear about assets being frozen, not seized, but do we really have proof of that.
Sean/SGT has recently gone the way of Bill Still Report, & Hodges Common Sense Show, in verbalizing a sponsor's ad in the midst of their show! :( SGT is trying his own formula of starting out like he's on topic with the video title, then within < 30 seconds he transitions to his sponsors' ad. Mega turn-off, which has reduced my viewing of these videos to a trickle.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
Bill Still's 'BS' has been esp immoral, in that he sandwiches the vid's actual content between a front & back end ad, then the 'main content' is mostly a several minute long clip which he agreed with, usu from a FOX News host or guest. So 'BS' is using FOX News content, to peddle his own sponsor clicks... :(
I agree with your take on the toxicity of the ad scams with YT videos.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Jake MorphedPhonyO appears to have YouTube related income generation as a main means of his financial income and support.
There has to be a better way to get truthful news and reporting on a new platform that does not rely, at all, on advertiser income. I would not mind paying a reasonable membership fee if it was run in a solid First Amendment way.
I just noticed that the iPhone has added the boy lover symbol as an emoji.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Think the last update is the one that added it.
Fucking creepy.
I was curious & did a joogle image search, iPhone+boy+love+emojiQuote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Salty
https://www.google.com/search?tbm=is...boy+love+emoji
^ joogle played dumb. You have an image?
I wasn't aware you're at odds with something about Jake M https://www.youtube.com/user/endtimesnews333/videos & https://www.blackstoneintel.com -- outside of your differing "religious convictions" (he's Mormon/LDS).Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
Is your conflict over differing Vegas FF beliefs? Namely, you're on board with Fetzer's "LV = full hoax" theory, vs Jake's "LV = FF/hoax-hybrid" theory?
If yes, prolly best to reply below, so not to derail this P*Gate thread. :)
Thread: Mass shooting at Vegas country music festival. AUTOMATIC GUNFIRE!
Agreed! Most of these internet celebrities are either shooting from the hip, speculating like we all are, or simply parroting what others say.
I don't put a whole lot of stock in these folks having the inside track of information that they spew. I'm more of a 'show me' than a 'tell me' kind of guy!
I'm taking some heat from a few Q fanboys for not drinking the Kool Aid and they now accuse me of shilling against Trump, which is absurd!. These are from people who quick to point out that liberals hate and attack anyone who disagrees with them yet they act just like them when they're challenged. The irony of the situation doesn't seem to register with them so I simply keep my trap shut and let them solve the world's problems all by themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dachsie
I was under the idea that SGT report was Jake's channel. Maybe wrong assumption.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
Anyway, assuming that was correct, I have no quarrel one way or another of his positions on any issue and assumed he was a Christian. Mormon is news to me.
As our original exchange here alluded to, it became clear that he was about generating income and staying within the parameters of YouTube rules and still being click baity enough to generate a lot of clicks. I noticed that quite a while back and stopped listening to him earlier in this year.
When someone becomes mainly about selling rather than fact finding and giving intelligent and truthful insights, I stop giving my time and attention.
It's supposed to be a cyclone, but it's not. Here's a link to the emoji as well as what the 'cyclone' looks like on other phones.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatColo
https://emojipedia.org/cyclone/
Facebook's cyclone is even more creepy.
https://www.9news.com.au/world/2018/...lian-taxpayers
A Melbourne man accused of raping and murdering a 12-year-old girl in the Philippines received half a million dollars in Australian taxpayer money to fight the charges.
The Australian reports Peter Scully was given about $500,000 to pay his legal bills by the federal government under a program called the Serious Criminal Matters Scheme.
The program provides legal funding for Australians facing serious charges overseas.
Scully is facing a litany of accusations after allegedly sexually assaulting a girl before strangling her and burying her under his house.
When he was arrested, two teenage girls were allegedly found naked and shackled in another apartment he rented.
He also allegedly made videos showing the torture of babies and toddlers.
Such videos were allegedly sold online for $10,000 each.
Scully's alleged crimes were so sickening that Philippines prosecutors pushed to reinstate the death penalty. Capital punishment has since been restored for serious drug offenders, but Scully will not face execution.
Australian Federal Police officer Paul Hopkins told 60 Minutes in 2015 that Scully was "the most depraved individual I have ever come across in 26 years of police".
"I've worked in nine different countries, I've worked in a lot of different jobs, I've never seen anything like this,” Hopkins said.
Dutch, Australian and Filipino police tracked down Scully in 2015 after recognising an Australian accent in one of his videos, titled Daisy's Destruction.
Police in the Philippines went house by house, matching up the interiors of homes with those seen in the videos.
Podesta get arrested yet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWU92C1Yi_U
Pretty good summarizing PizzaGate 33 minutes
Pizzagate Evidence and what Trafficking Really Looks Like
819 views
29
0
Share
Memory Hold
Published on Mar 12, 2018
Summarizing some Pizzagate infographs.
@memoryhold7707
IG: Memoryhold7
John Pedoesta has not been seen or heard from since either March 5 or 6.
speculation is he is about to board a fast train to Gitmo
Again we are waiting