Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
He says he lost all his immediate family to the holocaust, but as soon as he arrived to America he felt the need to change his family name from Pik to Peck, and he himself survived 9 concentration camps. If I ever went through that ordeal and survived, I would never change my family name to fit in. No honor!
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
http://andrewcarringtonhitchcock.com...-be-the-judge/
Quote:
There were no more than 4 million Jews living in Nazi-occupied territory. As the Nazi army advanced, the Jews fled rather than be captured. On June 30, 1965, the West German government announced that 3,375,000 Jewish “holocaust survivors” had applied for reparations.
http://www.jewwatch.com/jew-holocaus...axarchive.html
The baby-boomer generation lasted from 1946- 1964, so about 20 years is a generation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genera...of_generations
The statistics of 3.375 million jews “holocaust survivors”, after a generation of “holocaust survivors” died, shows that roughly the same number of jews that could be under the Nazi regime, survived the war. Only a marginal high tens of thousands jews died during the war (at the most in the low-mid 100,000s), as the Red Cross statistics also show. The number of jews that died were from natural causes. While the German deaths, war deaths (not from natural causes) and post-war deaths (not from natural causes) was 10-20% of the German population (source Pat Buchanan), conservatively. So these statistics prove the jews practically sat out the war unharmed under the Axis.
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Friday, November 25, 2016
German Holocaust denier Ursula Haverbeck, 88, again sentenced to prison
Ursula Haverbeck, a well-known historical revisionist, was sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison for Holocaust denial by a German court.
Haverbeck, 88, was convicted by a court in Verden on the basis of numerous articles she had published in the local newspaper Stimme des Reiches, or “Voice of the Reich,” in which she denied that the Holocaust occurred. Holocaust denial is illegal in Germany.
According to the German press agency dpa, Haverbeck repeated her theories in her own closing statement in court on Monday, referring to an “Auschwitz lie” and saying that it was not an extermination camp but rather a work camp where no one was gassed to death.
***Read full article here*** http://www.jta.org/2016/11/23/news-o...nced-to-prison
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
^ Weird, I don't recall that barrett/Williamson interview from 2013,
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wXUYfg...ature=youtu.be
Quote:
Bishop Williamson - Holocaustianity - Truth....or Consequences
BishopOfSardis 20,846 views
Subscribe
1,142
202
12
Published on May 24, 2013
Dr. Kevin Barrett interviews Bp. Williamson and Dr. Nick Kollerstrom
Apologies for glitches in audio, but still very worth while to hear
So I'm now listening... weird coz a long time gripe I have with barrett is his perpetual agnosticism re holohoaxianity, where he's a big truther in so many other areas.
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PatColo
...but notice, I didn't make a bee line to this thread to repost it as normal. Coz Weber showed how sold out, compromised, co-opted he is; and I didn't want to "promote him." Says (he believes...:rolleyes:) there were limited homicidal "gassings" at this and that obscure work/detention/transfer camp. Says he estimates perhaps ~4M jooz died... touts how he agrees with (the new...:rolleyes:) David Irving on this & that, seeking cred-by-association.
Well thing is; Irving changed his public tune on the holohoax, after dajooz uncharacteristically/"mercifully" :rolleyes: early-released him from an Austrian prison term after only 13 months of his 3 year sentence... and whuduyuhknow; Irving's been (publicly) singing from the kosher 6M/gas-chambers song sheet since. And, albeit without such a publicly visible/obvious "deal" as Irving's, Weber cites his "agreement" with the (formerly, pre-"deal") legendary David Irving... anticipating that people will imagine the cred & integrity of the pre-deal Irving, NOT the "New Irving."
What's nice about the above Rizoli interview of Weber is, Rizoli doesn't let him off easy... insists on hearing what physical/forensic evidence Weber has for his proclaimed holohoax beliefs; and Weber squirms... citing this-n-that (fabricated) "diary" and such, and oh yeah, the New David Irving...:rolleyes:
I've seen Carolyn Yeager on the attack against Weber now & again over the past few years; you can search her site for "Weber." Her grievances mainly point to how "ineffective/do-nothing" he's been as director of the Institute for Historical Review (IHR). Yeager just wrote this short opening, as a pointer to a new article by Hadding Scott, published at Commitee for Open Discussion of the Holohoax (CODOH)... well worth your time, as a companion reader to go with the Rizoli/Weber interview above.
Latest K.Barrett show; focus on D.Irving; 1 hr MP3 https://ia801504.us.archive.org/18/i...2017.02.08.mp3
Tuesday, February 7, 2017
Matthew Howard on "Revising Holocaust Revisionism"
Does holocaust revisionism need revising? That is the contention of today's guest, Matthew Howard, who says the world's most famous holocaust revisionist, David Irving – the antihero of last year's Hollywood propaganda film Denial – has erred in his recent suggestions that the holocaust happened pretty much the way the mainstream authorities say, except not at Auschwitz using cyanide gas, but at other Polish camps using diesel exhaust. (But is diesel exhaust even toxic?!)
Whatever killing methods the Nazis may have used, they sure didn't work on Chaim Ferster, who died a few days ago at the ripe old age of 94 after "surviving EIGHT Nazi death camps" according to Yahoo News.
Matt Howard wrote to David Irving asking him about some of the questions raised by the documentary film One Third of the Holocaust. Irving did not reply.
Has revisionist David Irving revised his views? Do his new views require further revising? Listen to Matthew Howard's contentions, study the issue for yourself, and make up your own mind.
Along with One Third of the Holocaust, those interested in the subject may wish to consult these sources:
International Military Tribunal for Germany (Yale Law School Archive)
Matthew Howard's first podcast on the holocaust
Thomas Dalton's book Debating the Holocaust
Anti-revisionism books Denying History and Denial
Kollerstrom vs. Myers debate: Should 9/11 truthers avoid holocaust revisionism? _ on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad Radio
The Diesel Gas Chambers by Friedrich Berg
Posted by Kevin Barrett at 7:22 AM
Labels: auschwitz, chaim ferster, David Irving, holocaust revisionism, matthew howard, treblinka
https://ia801504.us.archive.org/18/i...2017.02.08.mp3
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
8 "Death camps". 8...
As said before the only miracle about the holocaust is how anybody can believe in it.
Re: Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax