Armed Feds Prepare For Showdown With Nevada Cattle Rancher

More dirt on BLM's agent Dan Love.


https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...849b4c740b836a


The Oath with SSG Moe

1 hr ·

DANIEL P LOVE -- BLM SPECIAL AGENT IN CHARGE @ BUNDY RANCH A VICTIM? REALLY? I DONT THINK THAT'S GOING TO FLY!!

During Pete Santilli's failed bid for a pretrial release this past tuesday, the Prosecution gave away their future narrative concerning Special Agent Daniel P. Love. Prosecutor Steven Myre called Daniel P. Love a suffering victim, a description I am sure Mr. Love's massive ego has a hard time swallowing.

While this article is the best I have seen on the web so far concerning Love, it does not have all the info on him that will definitely be coming out in court by a witness that not only grew up with him, but served on the Salt Lake City Police Force with him --

This article states that Loves character will be important to the prosecution and there is key evidence that Loves character has many flaws.

Did the SLCPD cover up an incident involving Special Agent Daniel P. Love during the Salt Lake City Winter Olympics in which Love was said to have been found drunk, half naked, and having sex in a booth while on duty?

Was Daniel P. Love dismissed from the Salt Lake City Probation Dept. for failing to do his job?

The 2012 Winter Olympic incident was reported by another officer who was working the detail with Love in which it was their job to oversee dignitaries who had traveled to Salt Lake City to enjoy the games. Daniel P. Love had not answered calls from his team for hours, and being concerned for his safety the team went looking for him.

According to the former Law Enforcement Officer and life long acquaintance of the Love family, Special Agent Love was found in the bar with his pants half down, and a drink in his hand. He was also with a female, that wasn't his wife, who had her face buried in his lap.

Mr. Love threatened his team with repercussion if they breathed a word of what they had seen, but the witness tells us that SLCPD was made fully aware of the situation and chose to cover the incident up.

Oh yes Mr. Myre, your Golden Boy will have to answer some questions about his character on that stand -- Questions about his character that go beyond what this article has to say.




https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...fs=1&upscale=1



PUBLIC LANDS: The Bundy witness BLM won't talk about

As federal prosecutors seek to convict Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy for his role in a near-violent 2014 standoff with the Bureau of Land…
WWW.EENEWS.NET


https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...849b4c740b836a


The Oath with SSG Moe

1 hr ·

DANIEL P. LOVE -- WHO IS BOUND TO BE THE GOVERNMENTS KEY WITNESS DURING THE BUNDY TRIALS -- IS NOT A VICTIM!

" I urge you to make Dan Love accountable for his actions that caused the death of Dr. James Redd and fire him immediately —This is the consequence he deserves for his leadership of the BLM law enforcement Agency " ~Quoted - Bruce Adams

Bruce Adams is a county commissioner from San Juan County Utah (Blanding, Monticello). In This video he is speaking to Congressman Jason Chaffetz, Congressman Chris Stewart, Congressman Ron Bishop and a congressman from Arkansas. The first 3 congressman are from Utah and Jason Chaffetz is the head of the oversight committee for congress. It was recorded this past January 22, 2016.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kn4scNZ5W1g&feature=youtu.be
*************************************************
~Chastity

http://youtu.be/kn4scNZ5W1g

https://fbcdn-photos-b-a.akamaihd.ne...12f27ae393dfbb



https://www.facebook.com/TheOathwithSSGMoe/

Liberals petition BLM to attack Bundy Ranch.

http://youtu.be/jLHPUblbEMM

https://youtu.be/jLHPUblbEMM








Note: I had to remove the "s" from https to get it to embed.

Pete Santilli says the governments case in Nevada wil fall apart because Clark County never was federal land. The boundary was changed by an act of Congress on May 4, 1866 to add the territory to Nevada subject to the approval of the Nevada Legislature.

Jan. 17, 1867 Nevada Legislature votes to extend Nevada's border to include Clark County.

http://memory.loc.gov/ll/llsl/014/0000/00750043.tif

http://memory.loc.gov/ll/llsl/014/0000/00750043.tif

Bundy Ranch Political Prisoner Drops Bombshell from Jail: US Government will panic when this comes out

http://thewashingtonstandard.com/wp-...ard-728x90.jpg

Reporter and political prisoner Pete Santilli of The Pete Santilli Show dropped a bombshell from jail earlier this week. He claims that the information below, once it comes out in the open in court, will have the US government in a panic.


In a recorded statement by Deb Jordan, Pete’s co-host, Santilli said that the information comes from the congressional record 1866.



“The dirt at Bundy Ranch is in Clark County,” Santilli began. “Clark County has always been a part of the State of Nevada and is not federal land in any way shape or form, period.”


Take a listen to the entire interview below.

http://youtu.be/5C1Yzili8GM



“It is documented and we have the documentation,” he continued. “We will be going through the court system appropriately, but the entire Bundy Ranch debacle and what Cliven Bundy said on that stage to that Sheriff… unfortunately, these buffoon people that the US government’s US Attorney’s Office actually put on the record that Nevada, part of the Hidalgo Treaty and all this stuff is absolute lunacy that they are lining us all up about an incident that took place in Clark County Nevada that has never been part of federal lands since 1866.”


Santilli is right too. Even according to Clark County Nevada’s website, it was on May 4, 1866 that Nevada extended southern border into Arizona Territory, covering territory to point where Colorado River meets California Border. However, on January 17, 1867, the Nevada State legislature voted to extend southern border, taking in today’s Clark County.


That makes the land of Clark County a legal part of the State of Nevada, not federal land.
Prior to that, according to the website, “10/31/1864 Nevada becomes a state during the Civil War. Area now encompassed by Clark County is not part of original state of Nevada but is part of Arizona Territory.”


Clark County came into existence on July 1, 1909.


In all of the records on the Clark County website, there is no mention of what the Constitution demands for the federal government to acquire land in the state, namely the approval of the State legislature.


Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the US Constitution is clear about federal control of land.

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings– (Emphasis added).

Santilli attempted to convey this message on Monday at his hearing where he left the courtroom saying, “I’m a journalist. This is what they do in Communist China!” Instead of being released till trial, the judge continued to rule against him, as well as the Bundy men. Now, Cliven Bundy has filed suit against Judge Gloria Navarro, Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah, and Harry & Rory Reid for violating a myriad of rights that are to be protected in the Constitution.


Other representatives of the people took issue with the tyranny of the feds during the Bundy Ranch siege.


Republican Senator Dean Heller blasted Harry Reid’s comments about those who supported the Bundy’s as being domestic terrorists, “What Sen. Reid may call domestic terrorists, I call patriots. We have a very different view on this.”


Former Governor Brian Sandoval ripped into the Bureau of Land Management over the issue as well.
“No cow justifies the atmosphere of intimidation which currently exists nor the limitation of constitutional rights that are sacred to all Nevadans,” the Republican governor said. “The BLM needs to reconsider its approach to this matter and act accordingly.”


One can hope that this information would be spread far and wide and educate the people as to what is really taking place with the unconstitutional federal land grab.



If you would like to support Pete’s legal funds and help him in standing for the truth, click here.
If you would like to write to Pete and offer him some encouragement, here’s the address.


Pete Santilli SWIS #795071
Inverness Jail
11540 Inverness Dr.
Portland Oregon 97220

Don't forget to like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.


http://thewashingtonstandard.com/bun...l-panic-comes/

From Bundy Ranch facebook

Bundy Ranch

3 hrs ·







We are not surprised......
Former Bureau of Land Management Director Bob Abbey was "personally and substantially" involved in the sale of federal lands in Nevada that would have earned his future consulting firm $528,000, in violation of an ethics pledge he signed, the Interior Department Office of Inspector General said in a report released today.
The report also concluded that Mike Ford, a consultant and former BLM employee who was Abbey's business partner before and after Abbey's tenure as BLM director, leveraged his connections to agency leadership to gain insider knowledge of the land sale and expedite its approval.


[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.14902)]https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...fs=1&upscale=1[/COLOR]



PUBLIC LANDS: Former BLM chief pushed deal favoring his future firm -- IG
Former Bureau of Land Management Director Bob Abbey was "personally and substantially" involved…
EENEWS.NET

Home › News › Did The FBI Pose As Documentary Filmmakers To Gain Access During Bundy Ranch Standoff?

Did The FBI Pose As Documentary Filmmakers To Gain Access During Bundy Ranch Standoff?

petesantillishow 06/13/2016 News
http://thepetesantillishow.com/wp-co...-operatori.jpgGMN© Staff Writer – Guerrilla Media Network LLC – June 13, 2016“Journalists should not pose as police officers, and police officers should not pose as journalists. The welfare of the republic requires it.”
Rumor has it – much of the evidence gathered by the government for the upcoming trial, United States vs Cliven Bundy et el, will come from footage taken during and after the “Bundy Ranch Standoff” by FBI agents who posed as a film crew gathering information for a documentary being made by a company called Longbow Productions. It is not clear just exactly when the agents would have gained access and who specifically they spoke with. If this information is true then it answers the question as to just one of the ways the FBI infiltrated Bundy Ranch, and almost certainly raises the question of whether or not the persons being filmed and interviewed had their 5th amendment right violated.

We spoke with John Whitehead, founder of the Rutherford Institute, who explained why this type of interrogation if true, would raise serious doubts as to whether or not it was legal and should be allowed to be used in this case.

If the FBI went to Bundy Ranch with the intent to interview possible suspects, and build a case against them while posing as “Press [journalists]” to do it, then yes – it most definitely would be the duty of any defense attorney to vigorously challenge it. If this “documentary film crew” were indeed FBI agents asking specific questions to build a case against the person they were speaking with, then it would be in my opinion, a direct violation of that person’s 5th Amendment right to not incriminate themselves.

In simple terms; if any person being interrogated has not been Mirandized and given the choice to have legal counsel present before the questioning begins it would not be a legal interrogation, and the information they garnered in my opinion, cannot be used against them in this case. ~ John Whitehead

Posing as journalists in and of itself is a serious breech that has been opposed by The Society of Professional Journalists;

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has no business permitting its informants to impersonate journalists, said G. Kelly Hawes, president of the Society of Professional Journalists, after learning that an informant posed as a newspaper reporter during an FBI sting operation.

“The Society of Professional Journalists opposes the practice of police officers or FBI agents or their informants posing as journalists to obtain information,” said Hawes in a letter to Louis J. Freeh, FBI director. “It is imperative that the FBI and other law enforcement agencies be able to do their jobs. The American system of justice depends on it. But it is also imperative that journalists be able to do their jobs, acting as the watchdogs on government and the criminal justice system. Journalists should not pose as police officers, and police officers should not pose as journalists. The welfare of the republic requires it.”

Source
The Press is the only directly protected occupation mentioned in the 1st amendment to the Constitution and should be considered sacred. When someone is speaking with someone whom they perceive is a journalist, they have every reason to believe that the person to whom they are speaking is engaging in a constitutionally protected act.
Is it any wonder why FBI director James Comey made this statement in December of 2014 – after the Bundy Ranch [Operation Longbow] had supposedly taken place;

FBI Director James Comey on Tuesday left open the possibility that an agent might again pose as a journalist as part of an investigation, though he said such a tactic ought to be rare and “done carefully with significant supervision, if it’s going to be done.”

Comey told reporters at a roundtable discussion that he was “not willing to say never” when asked if the FBI would swear off future use of the tactic in response to an Associated Press demand made last month.

The AP sought assurances from the Justice Department and the FBI that impersonation would not be used again following revelations that an agent in Seattle posed as an AP journalist in 2007 during an investigation into bomb threats at a high school.

“I’m not willing to say never,” Comey said. “Just as I wouldn’t say that we would never pose as an educator or a doctor or, I don’t know, a rocket scientist.”

Source

There is no doubt; “if” evidence collected in an FBI operation like this proves to be what happened at Bundy Ranch, defense attorney’s in this case should and probably will oppose it. The government would just as likely argue the interrogations conducted at Bundy Ranch under the alleged FBI operation were legitimate because the persons being interrogated were not yet in legal custody. There would also be a strong argument as to whether or not “documentary filmmaker” is the same thing as “journalist.”

What future implications this has for an already rocky relationship between activist and journalist remains to be seen. If the FBI chose to use the cover of being a journalist to gain access to this historical protest, it will likely have many repercussion for the legitimate media when future events take place.

It’s not like filmmakers at Bundy Ranch were not willing to help the FBI out. Dennis Michael Lynch, a renowned documentarian who filmed at Bundy Ranch and was present at the gate when the standoff ended, has already admitted he turned all of his footage over to the FBI without even putting up a fight.

End Article


http://thepetesantillishow.com/did-t...anch-standoff/

Northwest News interview with Carol Bundy
Again America is Ruled by a King 18 minutes

http://youtu.be/xGmMJ97incU

https://youtu.be/xGmMJ97incU

Another wife's story



https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...90c80d9b308eb4


Andrea Olson-Parker added 2 new photos.

July 14 at 10:03am ·






Today I am going to share with you the truth about my husband. He is not a terrorist. He does not believe are public lands should be sold to private owners. He loves this country.

He went to the Bundy Ranch because of the image below. We have a First Amendment and it's not a Zone in America or at least it didn't used to be. He was not involved in the Oregon wildlife refuge take over. When he got into the defensive position that is shown in the picture of him, he was in fear of his life and the lives of the men woman and children in the wash.

He had BLM snipers aimed at him the entire time. He was also on the bridge with actual police who at any time could have arrested him and did not because he did not break the law.

When the BLM announced over the loud speaker that they were going to use tear gas on the protesters the protesters said a prayer and kept going. The BLM said we have been authorized to use deadly force on the protesters and that is when he took cover and was in fear of his life.

The media will not talk about the truth. After the Bowe Bergdahl situation happened in this town people should know that the media has an agenda and does not tell truth.

My life has been ruined by this situation but if it keeps America the land of the free I am ok with that. People think just because I am around the FBI is going to take them away. People will not look me in the eyes anymore. Everything I have done good in the past is not even a thought anymore.

People say "it must be so hard to be married to a terrorist" outside my kids school.

People tell me I should let him pay for what he did and stop talking to his friends. I have not spoke out because I was in a situation where I could not. I know people say these things because of fear and ignorance.

America is not the country I grew up in and I do not think it is a great place to have children in. If I knew what I know today I would not have brought children into this world. I fear for them after I am gone. I know many will read this and unfriend me but they were never my friends in the first place.

Call me a terrorist if it makes you feel better.


https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.n...64c5f5c4fa1f75
https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...18&oe=5822DDFE





35 Likes33 Comments172 Shares

This communist judge violates her oath of office and makes a stunning ruling in Bundy case.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/jud...sharingbuttons

Judge Makes Stunning Ruling In Bundy Case

"... the government wants to prosecute him in secret ..."
Scott Mason July 19, 2016 at 11:17am

Advertisement - story continues below

The Las Vegas Review Journal reports that without the benefit of a public hearing, U.S. Federal Judge Peggy Leen has issued an order ruling that no transcripts, reports or witness statements of any kind may be disclosed by defense teams for all 19 defendants in the 2014 armed standoff between Cliven Bundy’s camp and the FBI.
Leen made her decision Friday, citing potential death threats against prosecutors as justification.

“The government has made a sufficient threshold showing of actual and potential threats, intimidation and harassment to victims, witnesses and law enforcement officers to show good cause for a protective order restricting dissemination of pretrial discovery,” she wrote.

Advertisement – story continues below

Leen continued saying that a “common law or First Amendment right” for the press and the public to access the government’s pretrial evidence does not exist, though all information obtained through “open sources” such as the internet or social media would be accessible.

Ammon Bundy’s attorney, Dan Hill, was not pleased with the judge’s decision.

“It”s unfortunate that so much information is going to be kept from the public in this case. Ammon Bundy has never hidden anything and now the government wants to prosecute him in secret. I will continue to fight for justice in this case despite the government’s effort to keep information hidden,” he said.

Advertisement – story continues below

Chris Rasmussen, the attorney for defendant Pete Santilli, shared Hill’s opinion and says he plans to file an appeal on behalf of his client.

“He wants this trial to be open to the public, and he wants the public to see all of the evidence so that he can prove his innocence,” he said.

Maggie McLetchie — an attorney who represents the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Battle Born Media and The Associated Press — said she was disappointed with the judge’s decision.

“From the media’s perspective, the order still cloaks much of the information about this case in secrecy despite the heightened need for transparency the judge recognized when allowing the media to intervene,” McLetchie said. “It is deeply troubling that so many documents will be automatically hidden from public view.”
Advertisement – story continues below

The trial is currently set for Feb. 6 in U.S. District Court.

h/t: Las Vegas Review Journal

Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore says FBI has no evidence against Bundys
Watch the video on her facebook page, I am not able to embed it here


https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net...9f8406d60640c2


Assemblywoman Michele Fiore

2 hrs ·

Inside information FBI cover up - NO ACTUAL EVIDENCE. MUST SEE & SHARE.

5.7K Views
https://www.facebook.com/votefiore/

https://www.facebook.com/votefiore/v...type=2&theater