Printable View
Electric Universe is most wholly based in observational data. All manner of observable formations in the cosmos have been reproduced in the lab.
This is not so for current Big G. Its theory is contradicted on a daily basis through observation. I could place any number of article links to assert that.
Mainstream science loads them daily. Gravity alone does not guide the Universe.
that's the way it is, there it goes... flaws and inconsistencies are recognized by many, yet the same will stick to the mainstream interpretations.
scientism has ravaged many minds
Your hard data is the light switch on your wall.
And??? Where is the mathematical data to back up the claim that the universe is powering the electric sun?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
It's already been proven that you believe in bullshit fantasies. Yon cannot provide even the simplest explanation of how or why anyone would work for free. When I want to listen to bullshit I'll ask you.Quote:
Originally Posted by singular_me
Which can be measured, 120 volts here in the U.S. How much electricity to power the sun again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
I'll wait for the mathematical equations which will never arrive. I never knew you to believe in fantasies. I know Goldie has her issues of believing in absolute bullshit.
You disappoint me Horn, these are basic fundamental questions and yet not you or the Electronic Universe can even answer them.
For the record I did not call Ares a retard. I said he and mainstream science were retarded.
There is a difference here, no matter how slight. If noticed it could make a difference between Electric Universe theory and their lights coming on.
the equtions are all easily observable and already exist. E.U. theory has the known flash points of plasma charted. Their exact scalular relation to mass has not yet been pinpointed in the field.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ares
Generally speaking they are as standard related to as 110v AC charts wiring diagrams any filamentary type bulb.
And if the theory cannot survive the scientific method then it's junk. The theory has to be able to answer fundamental questions, be measured and have collaborative evidence so that others can see the data for themselves. Not rely on conjecture and assumptions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Electric Universe = Solution looking for a problem to fit the solution.
Until I see hard data (lights turning on can be measured) this theory is total junk science and does not survive even basic scrutiny.
They are not standard as I haven't seen a single equation backing up E.U. theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by Horn
Not one, and I've been looking for most of the day.